Barriers to integrating routine depression screening into community low vision rehabilitation services: a mixed methods study

Table 3 Mean scores for questionnaire scales & linear regression to determine difference in score over time

Scale	Timepoint	Mean	SD	Linear Regression
Scale	Timepoint	Mean	SD	Difference in means	95% CI	p-value
Action taken	Pre-training	−1.382	2.3073	Reference category
Action taken	Follow-up	1.386	2.3030	2.768	1.925 to 3.611	< 0.001
Log likelihood = − 177.608; Wald χ² = 41.42, p < 0.001
Perceived barriers	Pre-training	−0.474	1.3793	Reference category
	Post-training	−1.121	1.4637	−0.647	−1.012 to − 0.282	0.001
	Follow-up	−1.424	1.6457	−0.950	−1.315 to − 0.585	< 0.001
Log likelihood = − 188.596; Wald χ² = 27.15, p < 0.001

ISSN: 1471-244X