Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the meta-analysis

From: The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

FU

k

N1/N2

RR

95% CI

z (p-value)

I2

Q (p-value)

Hospitalised

3–24

5

257/240

0.86

0.66, 1.13

1.1 (0.270)

38%

6.5 (0.170)

Outcome

FU

k

N1/N2

SMD

95% CI

z (p-value)

I2

Q (p-value)

Days in hospital

9–24

5

242/211

−0.10

−0.34, 0.14

0.8 (0.426)

39%

6.6 (0.160)

Overall psychiatric symptoms

6–24

6

440/417

−0.01

− 0.21, 0.20

0.0 (0.961)

53%

10.7 (0.057)

Quality of life

12–24

5

356/332

0.08

−0.11, 0.26

0.8 (0.424)

32%

5.9 (0.206)

Recovery

12–18

3

300/293

0.22

0.01, 0.42

2.0 (0.042

36%

3.1 (0.211)

Empowerment

6–12

4

272/247

0.23

0.04, 0.42

2.3 (0.020)

14%

3.5 (0.323)

Satisfaction with services

12–18

2

140/146

0.19

−0.05, 0.42

1.6 (0.116)

0%

0.0 (0.878)

General and social functioning

6–12

3

100/81

0.01

−0.32, 0.35

0.1 (0.937)

21%

2.5 (0.283)

Social network support

12–24

4

258/254

0.09

−0.25, 0.42

0.5 (0.602)

67%

9.2 (0.027)

Working alliance – client rated

6–24

3

112/101

0.24

−0.03, 0.51

1.7 (0.080)

0%

0.6 (0.736)

Working alliance – staff rated

6–24

2

69/70

0.15

−0.18, 0.48

0.9 (0.379)

0%

0.3 (0.594)

  1. Key: FU follow-up; k – number of trials; N1 – sample size in intervention arm; N2 – sample size in control arm; RR Risk ratio, SMD Standardised mean difference, CI Confidence interval; z(p-value) – test of overall effect; I2 – measure of heterogeneity; Q(p-value) – Bartlett’s test of heterogeneity