Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameter estimates of fixed effects of group × time interaction effect for different Yit between MBCT vs. WC, HQCT vs. WC, and MBCT vs. HQCT

From: A randomized controlled trial on the comparative effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and health qigong-based cognitive therapy among Chinese people with depression and anxiety disorders

 

Initial status (β01)

Linear change (β11)

Quadratic change (β21)

Estimate

t

Estimate

t

Estimate

t

DASS-21

 MBCT vs. WC

−.170

−.143

2.54

2.89***

−.707

−1.67

 HQCT vs. WC

−1.71

−.710

3.84

5.20***

− 3.20

−3.97***

 MBCT vs. HQCT

.683

.311

−.876

−1.10

1.78

1.82

SF12_Phy

 MBCT vs. WC

.027

.118

−.460

−1.03

.156

.811

 HQCT vs. WC

.009

.020

−.786

−3.14**

.159

.402

 MBCT vs. HQCT

−.041

−.090

.504

2.12*

.153

.438

SF12_Men

 MBCT vs. WC

−.285

−.983

−.459

−3.73***

.079

.454

 HQCT vs. WC

−.060

−.104

−.568

−2.10*

−.027

−.066

 MBCT vs. HQCT

−.481

−.788

−.375

−1.31

.185

.463

CPSS

 MBCT vs. WC

1.56

2.93**

.520

2.28*

−.675

−2.61**

 HQCT vs. WC

.017

.016

−.345

−.336

.682

1.48

 MBCT vs. HQCT

3.26

2.86**

−.030

−.073

−2.03

−3.65***

PSQI

 MBCT vs. WC

.224

.589

.281

1.99*

−.170

−.910

 HQCT vs. WC

.690

.936

.490

1.72

−.275

−.695

 MBCT vs. HQCT

−.240

−.378

.079

.337

−.065

−.181

GSE

 MBCT vs. WC

.331

.601

−.196

−1.04

.081

.344

 HQCT vs. WC

−.844

−.802

−.753

− 1.66

.405

.691

 MBCT vs. HQCT

1.39

1.31

.390

.855

−.242

−.428

  1. Note. * < .05; ** < .01; *** < .001; MBCT Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, HQCT Health qigong based cognitive therapy, WC Waitlist control, DASS-21 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, SF12 Short-form 12, Phy Physical health status, Men Mental health status, CPSS Chinese Perceived Stress Scale, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, GSE General Self-efficacy Scale
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us