Skip to main content

Table 2 Main effects of the FKBP5 polymorphisms on depressive symptoms

From: Associations of FKBP5 polymorphisms and methylation and parenting style with depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents

Variable

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

OR (95% CI)

P value

q value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value

q value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value

q value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P value

q value

rs7757037*

 Codominant model

AA vs. GG

2.01 (0.94–4.34)

0.074

0.111

2.17 (0.93–5.01)

0.072

0.108

2.02 (0.86–4.78)

0.109

0.163

1.98 (0.85–4.64)

0.116

0.174

 

AG vs. GG

2.35 (1.13–4.92)

0.023

0.075**

2.56 (1.13–5.78)

0.024

0.062**

2.34 (1.02–5.36)

0.044

0.115

2.02 (0.89–4.63)

0.095

0.174

 Dominant model

AA+AG vs. GG

2.20 (1.10–4.39)

0.025

0.075**

2.38 (1.11–5.12)

0.026

0.062**

2.20 (1.01–4.78)

0.048

0.115

2.00 (0.93–4.33)

0.077

0.174

 Recessive model

AA vs. AG + GG

1.09 (0.63–1.89)

0.748

0.748

1.10 (0.61–2.00)

0.744

0.744

1.10 (0.60–2.02)

0.762

0.762

1.21 (0.66–2.23)

0.543

0.543

rs2817032*

 Codominant model

TT vs. CC

3.01 (1.18–7.70)

0.022

0.075**

3.63 (1.28–10.25)

0.015

0.060**

3.12 (1.09–8.89)

0.034

0.115

2.90 (1.02–8.27)

0.046

0.174

TC vs. CC

2.77 (1.04–7.35)

0.041

0.086**

4.01 (1.35–11.89)

0.012

0.060**

3.16 (1.05–9.55)

0.041

0.115

3.09 (1.03–9.24)

0.044

0.174

 Dominant model

TT + TC vs. CC

2.91 (1.17–7.27)

0.022

0.075**

3.76 (1.36–10.38)

0.011

0.060**

3.13 (1.12–8.74)

0.029

0.115

2.97 (1.07–8.25)

0.037

0.174

 Recessive model

TT vs. TC + CC

1.36 (0.81–2.28)

0.243

0.265

1.24 (0.71–2.15)

0.456

0.497

1.29 (0.73–2.29)

0.385

0.420

1.22 (0.69–2.16)

0.501

0.543

rs2817035*

 Codominant model

GG vs. AA

2.55 (1.03–6.32)

0.043

0.086**

2.93 (1.08–7.96)

0.035

0.069**

2.49 (0.90–6.86)

0.079

0.158

2.37 (0.86–6.54)

0.096

0.174

GA vs. AA

2.07 (0.80–5.37)

0.135

0.180

2.52 (0.88–7.20)

0.085

0.113

2.05 (0.70–5.99)

0.188

0.251

2.03 (0.70–5.90)

0.194

0.259

 Dominant model

GG + GA vs. AA

2.36 (0.98–5.72)

0.056

0.096**

2.78 (1.05–7.36)

0.040

0.069**

2.32 (0.86–6.25)

0.095

0.163

2.24 (0.84–6.02)

0.110

0.174

 Recessive model

GG vs. GA + AA

1.47 (0.87–2.47)

0.151

0.181

1.45 (0.83–2.54)

0.197

0.236

1.44 (0.81–2.57)

0.219

0.263

1.38 (0.77–2.46)

0.275

0.330

Parenting style of the father

 Authoritarian

 

1.00 (reference)

  

1.00 (reference)

        

 Permissive

 

0.26 (0.08–0.82)

0.021

NA

0.19 (0.06–0.66)

0.009

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Authoritative

 

0.24 (0.07–0.83)

0.024

NA

0.22 (0.06–0.82)

0.023

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Neglectful

 

4.62 (0.46–46.67)

0.195

NA

3.15 (0.29–34.59)

0.348

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Parenting style of the mother

 Authoritarian

 

1.00 (reference)

  

1.00 (reference)

        

 Permissive

 

0.13 (0.03–0.60)

0.009

NA

0.11 (0.02–0.53)

0.006

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Authoritative

 

0.25 (0.05–1.27)

0.095

NA

0.22 (0.04–1.21)

0.081

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Neglectful

 

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

  1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not applicable or not available
  2. *: Only the FKBP5 polymorphisms observed with a significant association of depressive symptoms in the unadjusted model were reported here
  3. Model 1: unadjusted models
  4. Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, living arrangement, and morning cortisol level
  5. Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, living arrangement, morning cortisol level, and parenting style of the father
  6. Model 4: adjusted for age, gender, living arrangement, morning cortisol level, and parenting style of the mother
  7. **: “q value” indicates the FDR-adjusted P value, and the results were considered as nominally significant when q < 0.10