Skip to main content

Table 3 Pattern of associations between irritability and Hot and Cool EF measures

From: Investigating the associations between irritability and hot and cool executive functioning in those with ADHD

 

N

Model

Standardised Beta

Unstandardized Beta (95% CI)

p-value

Cool EFs

 WCST Total Errors

N = 173

Unadjusted

B = 0.11

B = 0.64 (− 0.29; 1.57)

p = 0.17

Adjusted

B = 0.09

B = 0.51 (−0.40; 1.41)

p = 0.27

 WCST Perseverative Errors

N = 173

Unadjusted

B = 0.22

B = 0.70 (0.20; 1.20)*

p = 0.01

Adjusted

B = 0.19

B = 0.62 (0.13; 1.11)*

p = 0.01

 GnG RT to go signals

N = 185

Unadjusted

B = 0.05

B = 1.91 (−3.86; 7.67)

p = 0.52

Adjusted

B = 0.03

B = 1.04 (−4.54; 6.62)

p = 0.71

 GnG Probability of inhibition

N = 185

Unadjusted

B = −0.04

B = − 0.68 (−3.23; 1.87)

p = 0.60

Adjusted

B = 0.03

B = 0.55 (−1.74; 2.84)

p = 0.64

Hot EFs

 CPT total number of Cards

N = 208

Unadjusted

B = 0.02

B = 0.49 (−3.36; 4.33)

p = 0.80

Adjusted

B = 0.01

B = 0.14 (−3.77; 4.04)

p = 0.95

 TDT RT (delayed -immediate choice)

N = 176

Unadjusted

B = −0.10

B = −12.6 (−32.0; 6.86)

p = 0.20

Adjusted

B = −0.12

B = −14.4 (−34.0.;5.29)

p = 0.15

 TDT AUC

N = 176

Unadjusted

B = − 0.13

B = − 0.02 (− 0.05; 0.004)

p = 0.10

Adjusted

B = − 0.12

B = − 0.02 (− 0.05; 0.01)

p = 0.14

 UG Moderately Unfair offers accepted

N = 116

Unadjusted

B = − 0.19

B = − 0.05 (− 0.1; − 0.001)

p = 0.05

Adjusted

B = − 0.18

B = − 0.05 (− 0.10; 0.004)

p = 0.70

 CxR propensity to gamble

N = 151

Unadjusted

B = 0.09

B = 0.006 (−.01; .02)

p = 0.30

Adjusted

B = 0.09

B = 0.005 (−.01; .02)

p = 0.34

  1. Adjusted models were corrected for Age, sex, SES, where possible
  2. WCST Wisconsin Card Sorting Test task, GnG Go/no-Go task, CPT Continuous Performance Task, TDT Temporal Discounting Task, UG Ultimatum Game, RT Reaction Time, AUC Area Under the Curve
  3. *Significant p-values