Skip to main content

Table 2 Frequencies of specific measures in secluded and nonsecluded suicidal patients

From: Seclusion as a coercive measure in suicidality – daily routine or exception?

Intervention

 

Secluded patients (n = 53)

n (%)

Nonsecluded patients (n = 106)

n (%)

p value

One conversation

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

38 (71.7%)

6 (11.3%)

9 (17.0%)

104 (98.1%)

1 (0.9%)

1 (0.9%)

 < .001

Multiple

conversations

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

2 (3.8%)

2 (3.8%)

49 (92.5%)

32 (30.2%)

1 (0.9%)

73 (68.9%)

 < .001

In visual range of nursing staff

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

1 (1.9%)

1 (1.9%)

51 (96.2%)

4 (3.8%)

0 (0.0%)

102 (96.2%)

.557

Active surveillanceb

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

53 (100%)

46 (43.4%)

0 (0.0%)

60 (56.6%)

 < .001

Passive surveillancec

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

1 (1.9%)

0 (0.0%)

52 (98.1%)

5 (4.7%)

1 (0.9%)

100 (94.3%)

.776

Medication (without coercion)

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

13 (24.5%)

8 (15.1%)

32 (60.4%)

66 (62.3%)

5 (4.7%)

35 (33.0%)

 < .001

One-to-one intensive carea

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

2 (3.8%)

0 (0.0%)

51 (96.2%)

3 (2.9%)

0 (0.0%)

102 (97.1%)

.999

Open seclusion room/voluntarily seclusion

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

53 (100.0%)

9 (8.5%)

0 (0.0%)

97 (91.5%)

.030

Smoking a cigarette

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

2 (3.8%)

0 (0.0%)

51 (96.2%)

2 (1.9%)

0 (0.0%)

104 (98.1%)

.601

Contact family/relatives/reference person

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

53 (100.0%)

11 (10.4%)

0 (0.0%)

95 (89.6%)

.016

Eat/drink something

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

53 (100.0%)

7 (6.6%)

1 (0.9%)

98 (92.5%)

.096

Other interventiond

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

53 (100.0%)

9 (8.5%)

0 (0.0%)

97 (91.5%)

.030

At least one of the aforementioned interventions

Applied

Offered, but refused

Not offered

40 (75.5%)

6 (11.3%)

7 (13.2%)

106 (100.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 < .001

  1. Notes: Group comparisons were performed using Pearson’s chi2 tests, Fisher's exact tests, Mann–Whitney U tests or t tests
  2. aInformation was missing value for one nonsecluded patient
  3. bNurses proactively observe the patient
  4. cPatients are instructed to report to the nursing staff immediately in the case of crisis
  5. dDeveloping skills, going to sleep, receiving an infusion, signing a nonsuicide contract, etc.