Skip to main content

Table 1 Themes and subcategories

From: The use of borderline personality disorder severity index-iv feedback in adjusting borderline personality disorder treatment: therapists and patients perspectives

A. Experiences of therapists with the BPDSI

B. Experiences of patients with the BPDSI

C. Experiences of therapists with ROM in general

D. Experiences of patients with ROM in general

 

E. Importance of emphasizing ROM culture in organization

A1.1 BPDSI as advise for other healthcare organizations

A1.2 Only using BPDSI in ROM feedback

A1.3 BPDSI as important instrument in treatment

A1.4 Familiar with the BPDSI

A1.5 Disadvantages of the BPDSI

A1.6 Advantages of the BPDSI

A1.7 Information meetings about the BPDSI

B1. Benefits and disadvantages of the BPDSI

B1.1 BPDSI as advise for other healthcare organizations

B1.2 BPDSI as standard part of treatment

B1.3 BPDSI as important rom instrument

B1.4 BPDSI duration

B1.5 Insight because of BPDSI

B1.6 Disadvantages of BPDSI

B1.7 Advantages of BPDSI

B1.8 Recommended changes for BPDSI

B1.9 Opinions about questions in the BPDSI

C1. Benefits and disadvantages of ROM

C1.1 Factors to consider

C1.2 Increase in ROM outcomes at start treatment

C1.3 ROM is alienating

C1.4 ROM as valuable

C1.5 Disadvantages of ROM

C1.6 Advantages of ROM

C2. ROM gives insight

C2.1 Insight because of ROM in combination with clinical view

C2.2 ROM insight

C2.3 ROM insightful lists

C3. Using ROM in adjusting therapy

C3.1 Using ROM in adjusting therapy

C.3.2 Examples of adjusting therapy

C3.3 Used lists in adjusting therapy

C4. ROM in evaluation

D1. General experiences with ROM

D1.1 General impression

D1.2 Recommending the computer ROM lists

D1.3 Experiences of computer ROM lists

D1.4 point of improvements computer ROM lists

D1.5 Experiences with ROM feedback

D1.6 Insight because of ROM feedback

D1.7 Insightful ROM lists

D1.8 Disadvantages of ROM

D1.9 Advantages of ROM

D1.10 Recommended changes for ROM

D1.11 Important for therapist/organization

D2. Effect on therapeutic

relationship

D2.1 Understanding of therapist

D2.2 Experiences with understanding of therapist

D3. ROM use in evaluation

D3.1 Involvement

D3.2 Experiences with ROM feedback

D3.3 Insight because of ROM feedback

D3.4 Insightful ROM lists

D3.5 Linking ROM to evaluation moment

D3.6 Linking ROM to choices in adjusting treatment

D3.7 Possibilities to ask questions during ROM feedback

D3.8 Examples of questions about ROM during ROM feedback

D3.9 ROM feedback

D3.10 ROM feedback in individual session

D3.11 Enough time for ROM feedback

E1.1 Lack of ROM knowledge

E1.2 ROM information meetings

E1.3 Changing information facilities about ROM

E1.4 ROM in science

E1.5 Points of improvement for de Viersprong