Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic variables and differences in learning burnout (N = 583)

From: Learning burnout and its association with perceived stress, social support, and the Big Five personality traits in Chinese medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

 

N (%)

Emotional exhaustion (Mean ± SD)

F/tc

p

Cynicism (Mean ± SD)

F/tc

p

Low professional efficacy (Mean ± SD)

F/tc

p

Demographic variables

Gender

  

0.70

0.482

 

2.96

0.003*

 

-1.38

0.167

Male

260 (44.6)

13.01 ± 6.51

  

9.73 ± 5.08

  

13.93 ± 7.27

  

Female

323 (55.4)

12.63 ± 6.56

  

8.48 ± 5.10

  

14.76 ± 7.20

  

Place of residence

  

0.22

0.824

 

-1.72

0.086

 

-2.28

0.023*

City

345 (59.2)

12.85 ± 6.81

  

8.73 ± 5.21

  

13.84 ± 7.53

  

Village

238 (40.8)

12.73 ± 6.13

  

9.47 ± 4.97

  

15.20 ± 6.72

  

Only-child

  

1.51

0.132

 

0.80

0.423

 

-1.51

0.129

Yes

325 (55.7)

13.16 ± 6.82

  

9.19 ± 5.34

  

13.99 ± 7.48

  

No

258 (44.3)

12.34 ± 6.15

  

8.85 ± 4.84

  

14.90 ± 6.91

  

Father's education status

  

0.08

0.924

 

1.04

0.354

 

4.82

0.008*

Junior high or lower

226 (38.8)

12.75 ± 6.04

  

9.39 ± 4.99

  

15.54 ± 6.63a

  

Senior high school

108 (18.5)

12.64 ± 6.18

  

9.03 ± 4.71

  

13.95 ± 6.41

  

Junior college or higher

249 (42.7)

12.92 ± 7.12

  

8.71 ± 5.40

  

13.54 ± 7.96b

  

Mother's education status

  

0.71

0.492

 

0.91

0.403

 

4.45

0.016*

Junior high or lower

246 (42.2)

12.80 ± 6.01

  

9.36 ± 4.97

  

15.26 ± 6.62a

  

Senior high school

114 (19.6)

12.20 ± 5.85

  

8.68 ± 4.46

  

14.57 ± 6.65

  

Junior college or higher

223 (38.3)

13.10 ± 7.38

  

8.86 ± 5.59

  

13.35 ± 8.03b

  

Exercise

  

0.27

0.778

 

-0.13

0.898

 

1.96

0.055

No

536 (91.9)

12.82 ± 6.61

  

9.03 ± 5.12

  

14.53 ± 7.35

  

Yes

47 (8.1)

12.55 ± 5.77

  

9.13 ± 5.16

  

12.81 ± 5.63

  
  1. a,bCalculated by Dunnett T3 (unequal variances), mean scores for learning burnout with unequal superscripts differ significantly at the p < 0.05 level
  2. cIndependent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used