Skip to main content

Table 2 Sample Sizes of Subgroups

From: Impact of family functioning on mental health problems of college students in China during COVID-19 pandemic and moderating role of coping style: a longitudinal study

 

T1

T2

T3

T4

 

N

%a

N

%a

N

%a

N

%a

HF

6493

48.23

6493

48.23

5474

40.66

6219

46.20

Active coping

2085

15.49

(32.11)

2085

15.49

(32.11)

1797

13.35

(32.83)

1949

14.48

(31.34)

Negative coping

795

5.91

(12.24)

795

5.91

(12.24)

629

4.67

(11.49)

782

5.81

(12.57)

Strong response coping

1998

14.84

(30.77)

1998

14.84

(30.77)

1714

12.73

(31.31)

1951

14.49

(31.37)

Weak response coping

1615

12.00

(24.87)

1615

12.00

(24.87)

1334

9.91

(24.37)

1537

11.42

(24.71)

MdF

5911

43.91

5911

43.91

6674

49.58

6096

45.28

Active coping

1021

7.58

(17.27)

1021

7.58

(17.27)

1255

9.32

(18.80)

1128

8.38

(18.50)

Negative coping

1220

9.06

(20.64)

1220

9.06

(20.64)

1352

10.04

(20.26)

1242

9.23

(20.37)

Strong response coping

1419

10.54

(24.01)

1419

10.54

(24.01)

1625

12.07

(24.35)

1439

10.69

(23.61)

Weak response coping

2251

16.72

(38.08)

2251

16.72

(38.08)

2442

18.14

(36.59)

2287

16.99

(37.52)

SdF

1058

7.86

1058

7.86

1314

9.76

1147

8.52

Active coping

118

0.88

(11.15)

118

0.88

(11.15)

172

1.28

(13.09)

147

1.09

(12.82)

Negative coping

327

2.43

(30.91)

327

2.43

(30.91)

361

2.68

(27.47)

318

2.36

(27.72)

Strong response coping

211

1.57

(19.94)

211

1.57

(19.94)

289

2.15

(21.99)

238

1.77

(20.75)

Weak response coping

402

2.99

(38.00)

402

2.99

(38.00)

492

3.65

(37.44)

444

3.30

(38.71)

  1. HF Highly functional family, MdF Moderately functional family, SdF Severely dysfunctional family
  2. aValues within parentheses indicate within-group percentage