Skip to main content

Table 4 Methodological advances of current trial relative to past sensor-technology intervention trials among patients with communication difficulties

From: Heart rate monitoring to detect acute pain in non-verbal patients: a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

Limitations in literaturea

Current study features

Few controlled trials

Randomized controlled design

Small sample sized/insufficient power/case studies

A sample of 38 patients allowing us to detect an 0.80 effect size

Absence of studies using comparator interventions

Controlling for effect of study participation by including a group with delayed intervention

Exclusion of most vulnerable patients

Inclusion of profoundly disabled patients

Lack of standardized measures and biomarkers

HR, HRV and biochemical biomarkers in blood

No adherence data

Routine signing of protocol by secondary participants to measure adherence

Considerable heterogeneity of participants regarding type and level of communication need

Patients with ID ranging from severe to profound and ranging from ambulant to wheelchair user, loss of eyesight and hearing

  1. aBased on published reviews [29, 96], and review of studies on PubMed and Google Scholar using the phrases “sensor-technology intervention intellectual disability” and “technology intervention communication difficulties”