Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of longitudinal studies

From: Religiosity and spirituality in the prevention and management of depression and anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author date

Country

Study name

Year of baseline in paper

Follow-up(s) after baseline

Overall study sample

Study sample size at baseline

Study setting

Sampling method

Gender (%F, %M)

Religion

Mean (SD) age, age range at baseline

Attrition (loss to each wave)

Mental Health Outcomes

Quality rating (risk of bias)

Anxiety

Depression

Ahles [19], 2016

Canada

NA

NR

T2-8: 7 consecutive weekly follow-ups

Undergraduate students from a small, private Christian university

320

Tertiary education

Convenience

71%F

NR

19.08 (2.1)

NR

 

CES-D SF

Low risk of bias

Ahmed [20], 2011a

USA

NR

NR

T2: 6—12 months

Homeless adolescents within a metropolitan area

186

Social welfare services

Probability

63%F

NR

16.01 (1.30), 13 to 17

NA

 

BSI

Low risk of bias

Benore [21], 2008

USA

NA

NR

T2: 1 month post hospitalization

Children and adolescents admitted for inpatient treatment of asthma

87

Hospital

Convenience

45%F, 55%M

Christian: 90%

No affiliation: 10%

11.6 (2.45), 8 to 17

T2: 29%

STAIC

CES-D-SF

Moderate risk of bias

Berry & York [22], 2011

USA

NA

2008

T2-6: 5 monthly follow-ups

Religious public mid-western university students

214

Tertiary education

Convenience

70%F

Christian: 74% Islamic: 0.5% Jewish: 0.5% Other: 18% No affiliation: 15%

NR

T2: 5.1%

T3: 7%

T4: 6.5%

T5: 10.7%

T6: 16.8%

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Berry [23], 2012

USA

NA

2010

(Early in autumn term)

T2: Immediately following winter break

T3: Immediately following spring break

T4: Near the end of spring term

Incoming freshmen from colleges and universities

124

Tertiary education

Convenience

66%F

Christian: 29%

Islamic: 26.6%

Jewish: 20.2%

No affiliation: 24.2%

Primarily 18 to 21 (95%)

NR

 

3 items from American College Health Association’s

National College Health Assessment

Moderate risk of bias

Booth [24], 2008

USA

AddHealth

1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

Adolescents in grades 7 to 12

6507

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based, cluster

52%F

NR

15.7 (1.7)

WII: 26.5%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Carpenter [25], 2012

USA

NR

NR

T2-T9: 8 weekly follow-ups

Adolescents in grades 9 to 12 from private religiously affiliated high schools

111

School

Convenience

72%F

Christian: 83.9%

Jewish: 0.9% Hindu: 0.9% No affiliation: 14.3%

16.4 (1.33), 14.1 to 19.3

NR

 

CDI@

Moderate risk of bias

Chan [26], 2014

USA

NA

NA

T2: Two years

T3: Four years

12th grade young adults followed until four years out of public high school

744

School, community

Mixed: Convenience and random

55%F, 45%M

Christian: 44.1%

Jewish: 5.1%

Buddhist: 7.7%

Other: 3.5%

No affiliation: 39.6%

17.9 (0.38)

T2: 29%

T3: 25%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Chen [27], 2018

USA

Growing Up Today Study (GUTS)

1999

T2: 2007

T3: 2010

T4: 2013

Children (transitioning from adolescence to young adulthood) of participants in the Nurses Health Study

5,681 to 7,458

Community

Convenience

42.%M

NR

14.74 (1.66), 8 to 14

NR

Breslau’s 7-item short screening scale for PTSD

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Cotton [28], 2013

USA

NA

NR

T2: 11–14 months

Urban adolescents with asthma

151

Hospital

Convenience

60%F

Christian: 75%

No preference: 23%

Other: 2%

15.8 (1.8)

T2: 12.6%

MASC-10

CDI-S

Low risk of bias

Davis & Kiang [29], 2016

USA

NA

NA

WII-IV: 3 yearly follow ups

Asian American 9th and 8th grade public high school students

180

School

Stratified cluster

60%F

Christian:

33.8%

Shamanism/animism: 25.4%

Hinduism: 9.7%

Jainism: .6%

Islamic: 3.6%

Atheism/agnostic: 1.8%

Not specified: 15.8%

15.03 (0.92), 13 to 18

WII: 9%

WIII: 13%

WIV: 33%

 

CES-D, PANAS

Low risk of bias

Dew, Fuemmeler & Koenig [30], 2020a

USA

AddHealth

1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

WIII: 2001–2002

WIV: 2008–2009

Adolescents with parent interview data from WI

9416

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based, cluster

55%F, 45%M

NR

15.8 (1.6)

NA

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Dew, Kollins & Koenig [31], 2020a

USA

AddHealth

1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

WIII: 2001–2002

WIV: 2008–2009

8142 adolescents with religious data from all four waves and parent interview data from Wave I

8141

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based, cluster

55%F, 45%M

Christian: 83%

Jewish: 0.7%

Muslim: 0.2%

Buddhist: 0.4%

Hindu: 0.1%

Other: 3%

None: 11%

15.8 (1.6)

NA

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Dew [32], 2010

USA,

NA

NR

T2: 6 months

Adolescents from outpatient psychiatric clinics

145

Clinical

Convenience

42%F

Christian: 93%

Other: 5%

No affiliation: 5%

14.3 (1.8), 12 to 18

T2: 28%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Goeke-Morey [33], 2014

Northern Ireland

NA

NR

(WV)

WVI: 12 months

Youth from socially deprived wards in Belfast

667

Community

Stratified random

50%F, 50%M

Christian: 100%

15.75 (1.97)

NR

BSI

BSI, GHQ-12

Moderate risk of bias

Harker [34], 2001a

USA

AddHealth

1994–1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

Adolescents who participants in both WI and WII

13350

Community, school

Multistage, stratified, school-based, cluster

50%M

NR

15.04

NA

 

CES-D, BDI

Low risk of bias

Helms [35], 2015

USA

NA

NR

T2: 12 months

11th grade students from rural, low-income high schools

313

School

Convenience

54%F

Christian: 80%

Jewish: 0.3%

Hindu: 0.6%

Unsure/No affiliation: 14.7%

17.13 (0.48)

T2: 26%

 

MFQ

Low risk of bias

Horowitz & Garber [36], 2003

USA

NA

NR

T2-7: 6 yearly follow ups

6th grade public school students

240

School

Judgmental

52.4%F

NR

11.86 (0.57)

NR

 

K- SADS-E, K-LIFE

Low risk of bias

Kasen [37], 2012

USA

NA

NR

T2: 10 years

T3: 20 years

Offspring of depressed and non-depressed parents

263

Clinical, community

Judgmental

58.9%F

Christian: 79.5%

Other affiliation: 20.5%

NR

T2: 15.6%

T3: 29.4%

 

K- SADS-E, SADS-L,

Low risk of bias

Kent [38], 2020a

USA

AddHealth

1995 (WI)

WIII: 2001–2002

WIV: 2007–2008

Grades 7 to 12 adolescents with complete depressive symptoms measurement data

12248

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

54%F, 46%M

NR

NR

NA

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Kent & Bradshaw [39], 2020a

USA

AddHealth

1995

(WI)

WIII: 2001–2002

WIV: 2007–2008

Grades 7 to 12 adolescents with complete depressive symptom measurement data

12248

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

55%F

NR

13 to 18

NA

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Kim [40], 2002

South Korea

NA

NR

T2: 4 weeks

Undergraduate psychology students

113

Tertiary education

Convenience

35%F, 65%M

Christian: 44%

Buddhist: 5%

Other: 3%

No preference: 48%

20 (Median age), 19 to 33

NR

 

PANAS

Low risk of bias

Lalayants [41], 2020

USA

National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing

2008–2009

(WI)

WII: 2009 – 2011 (18 months)

Youth who underwent Child Protective Services Investigation

5872

Social welfare services

Judgmental

41%F,59%M

NR

11 to 16

WII: 17% weighted attrition

 

CDI@

Moderate risk of bias

Le [42], 2007

USA

AddHealth

1994–1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

Grades 7 to 12 African American, Asian America, European American, Hispanic America or Native American adolescents

13317

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

NR

NR

NR

NR

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Liu [43], 2011

USA

NA

NR

WII: 6 months

7th grade adolescents of Mexican origin

189

School

Convenience

54%F

NR

12.29, 11 to 14

WII: 13.2%

YSR, CBCL

YSR@, CBCL

Low risk of bias

Malooly [44], 2017

USA

Adolescent Adjustment Project

2007

T2: 2008

T3: 2009

10th and 11th grade urban and rural public high school students

485

School

Convenience

54%F

NR

16.10 (0.67)

T2-3: 20%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Miller [45], 2002

USA

NA

1977–1985

T2: 1992—1996

Youths with and without a history of childhood depression followed up into early adulthood

269

Clinical, community

Mixed: Convenience (with childhood depression) and random (without childhood depression)

47%F, 53%M

Christian: 68.4%

Jewish: 10.7%

Other: 12.6%

NR

NR

 

K-SADS-E, SADS-L

Moderate risk of bias

Paunesku [46], 2008

USA

AddHealth

1995

(WI)

WII: 1996 (12 months)

Adolescents in grades 7 to 12

6504

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

48%M

NR

16.1 (1.8)

WII: 26.5%

 

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Perez [47], 2009a

USA

NA

NR

T2: 6 months

T3: 12 months

Public school students from 6th through 9th grades

1096

School

Convenience

50%F

NR

11 to 15

NA

 

CDI, 27-item modification of the BDI

Low risk of bias

Peterman [6], 2014a

USA

National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Study of Early Child Care

1991

T2: 3 years

Early adolescents followed up in mid-adolescence

952

School

Quota

48%F

NR

11 to 12

NA

YSR@

YSR@

Low risk of bias

Petts [48], 2008a

USA

AddHealth

1994–1995

(WI)

WII: 1996

Grade 7 to 12 adolescents who participated in both WI and WII, have information from parents and valid sample weights

13568

School, community

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

NR

NR

NR

NA

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Possel [49], 2011

USA

NA

NR

T2:4 months

High school students

273

School

Convenience

65%F

NR

15.29 (0.68)

NR

 

CDI @

Moderate risk of bias

Ramos-Olazagasti [50], 2013

USA

Boricua Youth Study

2000

WII: NR

WIII: 2004

Puerto Rican youth living in Standard Metropolitan Areas of San Juan and Caguas, Puerto Rico, and in the South Bronx, New York

1271

Community

Multistage probability

50%F, 50%M

NR

11.6

WII: 7.95%

WIII: NR

 

NIMH-DISC-IV

Low risk of bias

Rasic [51], 2013

Canada

Adolescent Health Survey

2000–2001

T2: 2002–2003

10th grade high school students

976

School

Convenience

51%F, 49%M

NR

15.7 (0.6)

T2: 38.1%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Reynolds [52], 2014

USA

NA

2008–2009

T2: 2009–2012 (2 years)

Adolescents with cystic fibroisis or diabetes

128

Hospital

Convenience

53%M

Christian: 86%

Other: 3%

No affiliation: 11%

14.7 (1.8)

T2: 32%

 

Behavioral Assessment System for Children-Second Edition

Low risk of bias

Riley [53], 2016

USA

NA

NR

T2: 3 months

Sexual and gender minority (SGM), and heterosexual first-year urban Jesuit university students transitioning to and across college

2810

Tertiary education

Convenience

SGM: 56%F; heterosexual 71%F

NR

SGM: 18.38, Heterosexual: 18.49

T2: 36.8%

DASS-21

DASS-21

Moderate risk of bias

Sallquist [54], 2010

Indonesia

NR

NR

T2: 7.25 months

T3: 1 year

7th grade Muslim students

959

School

Convenience

53%F, 47%M

NR

13.33 (0.68), 11 to 16.92

NR

Kendall, Henin, Macdonald, and Treadwell's anxiety scale

CDI#

Moderate risk of bias

Smokowski [55], 2014a

USA

Rural Adaptation Project (RAP)

2011

T2: 2012

T3: 2013

Middle school students from rural, disadvantaged counties followed up into high school

4036

School

Mixed: Judgmental and random

52%F, 48%M

NR

12.8

NR

YSR#

YSR#

Moderate risk of bias

Smokowski [56], 2017a

USA

Rural Adaptation Project (RAP)

2011

T2: 2012

T3:2013

T4:2014

Middle school students from rural, disadvantaged counties followed up into high school

3715

School

Mixed: Judgmental and random

52%F, 48%M

NR

12.7 (1.05)

NR

YSR#

YSR#

Moderate risk of bias

Upenieks [57], 2021a

USA

National Study of Youth and Religion (NSYR)

2007–2008

(WIII)

WIV: 2013

Emerging adults

2432

Community

Random sample via telephone digit dialing

49% F

Christian: 84%

Jewish: 5%

Other/indeterminate: 11%

25.42,

20 to 32

NA

 

Modified 8-item version of CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Van der Jagt-Jelsma [58], 2017

Netherlands

TRacking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) clinical cohort

2004

T2-4: 3 follow-ups at 2 to 3 year intervals

Pre-adolescents with psychiatric problems referred to an outpatient psychiatry clinic followed up to young adulthood

543

Clinical

Judgmental

34% F, 66% M

NR

10 to 12

T2: 14.9%

T3: 22.8%

T4: 22.3%

ASEBA-YSR and ASR

ASEBA-YSR and ASR

Moderate risk of bias

Van Voorhees [59], 2008a

USA

AddHealth

1995 (WI)

WII: 1996

Adolescents in grades 7 to 12

6504

Community, school

Multistage, stratified, school-based cluster

NR

NR

NR

WII: 26.4%

Single question “Over the last twelve months, have you had trouble relaxing?”

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Wortman [60], 2012

USA

NA

NR

T2: 2 months

Undergraduate psychology students

140

Tertiary education

Convenience

64% F, 36% M

Christian: 100%

18.7 (0.98)

T2: 3%

Impact of event scale for PTSD

CES-D

Moderate risk of bias

Yang [61], 2017

Taiwan

NA

NR

T2: 6 months

High school students

2239

School

Multistage stratified cluster

47% F, 53% M

Buddhist or Daoist: 86.8%

16 to 18

T2: 12.9%

 

CES-D

Low risk of bias

Yeterian [62], 2015

USA,

NA

2006–2009

T2: 3 months

T3: 6 months

T4: 12 months

(post-intake)

Adolescents who presented for treatment at an outpatient substance use disorder treatment facility

127

Clinical

Convenience

24%F, 76%M

NR

16.7 (1.2), 14 to 19

T2: 8.7%

T3: 15.7%

T4: 87.4%

 

BSI (global severity index)

Low risk of bias

  1. ASEBA-YSR Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment- youth self-report, ASEBA-ASR- ASEBA- Adult self-report, BDI- Beck Depression Inventory, BSI- Brief Symptom Inventory, CBCL- Child Behavior Checklist [63], CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D SF- CES-D Short Form, CDI- Children’s depression inventory, CDI@- CDI [64], CDI#- CDI [65], CDI-S CDI, short version, GHQ-12- General Health Questionnaire, K-SADS-E- Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Epidemiologic version, K-LIFE- Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation for children, MASC-10, Multidimensional anxiety Scale for children-10 item, MFQ- Mood and Feelings Questionnaire PANAS-, NIMH-DISC-IV- National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children IV, SADS-L-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia – Lifetime Version, STAIC-State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, YSR@- Youth self-report [63], YSR#- Youth self-report (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001), NA not available, NR not reported, F female, M male, T2,T3,T4- follow-up timepoints after T1 (considered as baseline), apaper reported sub-sample of a larger study