Main theme 1: Valuing the program because it is useful and benefits patients | |
Subtheme 1 (Psychiatric Residents): | Subtheme 1 (SPC Counselors): |
Valuing the program because of their belief in the potential effectiveness: “An active referral that’s actually going to work” | Valuing the program because it allows them to be a safe “bridge” for patients |
Main theme 2: Having a mutual desire to understand what happens from the ED to discharge to program follow-up | |
Subtheme 2 (Psychiatric Residents): | Subtheme 2 (SPC Counselors): |
More than checking off a “checklist”: Desiring to know “what actually happens in the program” after a referral is made | Fixing the disconnect: Desiring to know “what’s happening on the side of the ED?” |
Main theme 3: Uncertainty about which ED Patients would benefit from program services | |
Subtheme 3 (Psychiatric Residents): | Subtheme 3 (SPC Counselors): |
Struggling to know which patients are “good fits” for the program | Wrestling with uneven realities: “first timers” and those with “many diagnoses” can potentially both benefit |
Main them 4: Brainstorming to improve the referral process | |
Subtheme 4 (Psychiatric Residents): | Subtheme 4 (SPC Counselors): |
Envisioning a more streamlined, efficient referral process | Having a wish list that includes getting key contextual and accurate referral information |