Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis of post-aborted depression
From: Global prevalence of post-abortion depression: systematic review and Meta-analysis
Author/year | Country | Setting | Design | Sample size | Prevalence | Measurement scale | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.A Boersma/2014 [34] | Netherland | Institutional | Cohort | 92 | 30% | CES-D | Low-risk |
Akdag Topal/2019 [44] | Turkish | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 60 | 85% | HADS | Low-risk |
Angela J Taft/2008 [30] | Australia | Community | Cohort | 1076 | 30% | CES-D | Low-risk |
Asma Sa’d Basha et.al/2020 [35] | Jordan | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 200 | 22.5% | PHQ-9 | Low-risk |
F.Hanschmidt et.al/2017 [37] | Germany | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 148 | 10.8% | PHQ-9 | Low-risk |
Bujar Obertina et.al/2016 [36] | Kosovo | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 122 | 27.8% | EPDS | Low-risk |
Farnoosh Moafi/2018 [38] | Iran | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 185 | 54% | EPDS | Low-risk |
Kolte et.al/2014 [39] | Danish | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 301 | 8.6% | SDS | Low-risk |
Kukulskiene/ 2016 [40] | Lithuania | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 839 | 59.1% | EPDS | Low-risk |
L.Gao et.al/2019 [32] | China | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 278 | 37% | EPDS | Low-risk |
L.Jacob et.al/2017 [41] | Germany | Institutional | Cohort | 12,158 | 8.9% | NR | Low-risk |
Zhang et.al/2021 [33] | China | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 253 | 22.5% | PHQ-9 | Low-risk |
Wang et.al/2021 [42] | China | Institutional | Case-control | 1132 | 48.6% | SDS | Low-risk |
Azin et.al/2020 [43] | Iran | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 130 | 40.8% | Beck’s scale | Low-risk |
Mutiso et.al/2018 [31] | Kenya | Institutional | Cross-sectional | 182 | 8.6% | EPDS | Low-risk |