Skip to main content

Table 1 Full list and details of the cohort and case–control studies included in the systematic literature review

From: Long-term outcomes of selective mutism: a systematic literature review

Study Country

Study design Treatment provided, if any

Sample size Age at baseline

Length of follow up

Setting and diagnostic methods for mutism

Outcom

Methods used to measure outcomes

Results summary at follow up

Predictors for outcomes

Cohort studies

Arajärvi, 1965 Finland [29]

Clinical cohort Psychosocial, in-patient treatment

n = 12

4–8 years

1–10 years

Clinical

SM symptoms

Questionnaires filled in by parents and one case investigated by clinician. Cognitive assessment, projective tests

11/12 spoke in school after treatment but one still had SM symptoms

 

Dogru, 2023

Turkey [30]

Clinical cohort

Psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy

n = 49

5–13 years

N/A

Duration of SM was 2.22 ± 1.35 years

Clinical data from patient records verified by comparing these to DSM-5 symptoms of SM

SM symptoms

(K-SADS-PL), CGI

Mean duration of SM was 2.2 years. Duration of SM did not differ between males and females

Children with severe SM symptoms had a longer duration

of illness and higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity

Kamani & Monga, 2020

Canada [16]

Clinical cohort

Psychosocial/ pharmacological. 74% received CBT. 45% received medication for anxiety, mainly SSRIs

n = 31

22 with SM and 9 with just social anxiety disorder

4–14 years

2–6 years mean = 

4.2 years

Clinical (from patient records). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV

SM and social anxiety disorder

Clinical, parent interview with ADIS, CGAS, SMQ and SCARED tools

2/31 only had SM, 11/31 only had social anxiety disorder, 9/31 had both and 9/31 had neither

No difference between the types of treatment, not even for CBT

Older age at baseline might predict impairment and higher rate of anxiety at follow up

Lang et al., 2016

Israel [31]

Clinical cohort

SM focused CBT

n = 24

6.40 ± 3.06 years

2.90 ± 3.23 years

Clinical (from patient records)

SM and comorbid psychiatric disorders

Clinical, structured interviews and ADIS-IV-L, CGI and SMQ

The recovery rate for SM was 84.2%. A significant decrease was observed in the levels of social phobias and specific anxiety disorder. No statistically significant improvement in other comorbidities after the follow-up period

 

 Lowenstein, 1979

UK [32]

Clinical cohort

Psychosocial

n = 21

3–8 years

7 years

Clinical

SM symptoms

Not clear

13/21 spoke normally

6/21 had some symptoms left

2/21 had SM

 

Oerbeck et al., 2018

Norway [33]

Clinical cohort

School-based CBT intervention

n = 30

3–9 years

5 years

Clinical

Psychiatric diagnoses

Clinical assessment of the child and structured interviews from parents and teachers. SSQ, SMQ, ADIS-IV, K-SADS-PL, ILC

21/30 in full remission

5/30 in partial remission

4/30 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for SM

7/30 children (23%) fulfilled criteria for social phobia, and 2/30 had separation anxiety disorder, 3/30 had specific phobia and 1/30 had enuresis nocturna

Older age, symptom severity at baseline and familial SM were significant negative predictors for the outcome

Remschmidt et al., 2001

Germany [17]

Clinical cohort

Psychosocial. In-patient treatment, family counselling

n = 41

8.7 ± 3.6 years

12.0 ± 5.2 years

Clinical

SM symptoms, psychopathology symptoms, family psychopathology

From patient records and 31 patients were personally assessed using standardized assessments. Interview included the Marburg Symptom Checklist and MBI or BI

16/41 cases (39%) in remission

12/41 (29%) remarkable improvement. 8/41 (20%) mild improvement. 5/41 symptomatology remained unchanged. 10% had dysphoric mood. 19% had depression. 48% had impulsivity. 42% had severe psychopathological disturbances

Worse outcome was predicted by depressive/dysphoric mood, SM in the family, psychiatric disorders in the family, deviant parenting style were predictors

Sluckin et al., 1991

UK [34]

Clinical cohort

Psychosocial. Individual behavioural therapy or

school based programs

n = 25

4–8 years

2–10 years

Not stated, but study carried out in clinical settings

SM symptoms

Follow-up questionnaires for parents and teachers and Rutter Rating Scale for teachers

9/11 in the behavioural group improved, 5/14 in the standard program improved. (Difference in the groups was significant, p < .05)

Behavioural group treatment for better outcome. Familial psychopathology for worse outcome (p < .05)

 Wergeland, 1979

Norway [35]

Clinical cohort

6 received individual psychotherapy, including 4 who had in-patient treatment

5 did not receive treatment

n = 11

6–12 years

8–16 years

Clinical

SM symptoms and psychopathology

Interviews with parents, patients, and siblings. If needed, information from schools, employers and hospitals were obtained

11/11 in remission from selective mutism. Two of four children, who had received in-patient treatment, were diagnosed with a neurotic disorder and one of those four was diagnosed with a psychotic disorder at follow up

 

Case–control studies

Kolvin & Fundudis, 1981

UK [36]

Case–control

Not specified. Received best treatment available at the time mentioned

n = 24

6–8 years

5–10 years

Clinical

SM symptoms

Not clear

11/24 had improved: 3/24 (12.5%) markedly improved, 8/24 (33%) moderately improved and 13/24 (54%) slightly or not improved

More girls than boys in the improved group. Less parental personality problems in the improved group. No statistical analyses made for these findings due to lack of power

 Steinhausen et al., 2006

Switzerland [18]

Case–control

Not specified

n = 33

8.5 ± 3.1 years

Not reported but the mean age at follow up was 21.6 ± 3.3 years

Clinical

SM symptoms and any DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses

Clinical interview, clinical global improvement scale of SM, and psychiatric assessment by using CAPI version of the Munich-International Diagnostic Interview at follow up

All displayed some improvement. 6/33 (18.2%) were slightly improved, 8/33 (24.2%) were markedly improved and 19/33 (57.6%) were totally improved. Subjects with SM had significantly more phobic disorders (p < 0.001) than healthy controls, but no more than controls with anxiety disorders. 14/33 (42.4%) had phobic disorders. 19/33 (57.6%) had any psychiatric diagnosis. More diagnoses than in healthy controls (p = 0.005)

Severity of SM at outcome was not predicted by any tested factors. Comorbidity at outcome: any psychiatric disorder was significantly predicted by family history of taciturnity (p = .04). Phobic disorders significantly predicted by immigrant status (p = .02)

  1. Abbreviations: SM Selective mutism, CBT Cognitive behavioural therapy, SSRI Selective serotonin receptor inhibitor, CGI The Clinical Global Impression Scale, ADIS Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule, CGAS Children’s Global Assessment Scale, SMQ Selective Mutism Questionnaire, SCARED Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders, SSQ The school speech questionnaire, K-SADS-PL Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (6–18 Years), ILC The inventory of life quality in children and adolescents, MBI The Mannheim Biographic Inventory, BI Biographic Inventory, CAPI The computer-assisted personal interview