Skip to main content

Table 4 Factor loadings of the competing models using the data at T2

From: Factor structure and measurement invariance of the 8-item CES-D: a national longitudinal sample of Chinese adolescents

Item

Model 1

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

DM

SC

DS

Neg

DS

Pos

NS

DHF

n6

0.74

 

0.27

0.72

0.76

 

0.76

 

n7

 

0.78

0.29

0.70

0.75

 

0.75

 

n11

 

0.61

0.28

0.54

0.61

 

0.61

 

n14

0.77

 

0.34

0.71

0.79

 

0.79

 

n18

0.78

 

0.31

0.74

0.80

 

0.80

 

n20

 

0.75

0.30

0.68

0.74

 

0.74

 

p12

0.59

 

0.80

 

0.32

0.74

 

0.80

p16

0.61

 

0.82

 

0.33

0.74

 

0.82

AVE

0.49

0.51

0.23

0.47

0.44

0.55

0.55

0.66

Variancea

50.15%

58.30%

57.88%

57.95%

  1. aThe content in the last row demonstrated explained percentage of the factor(s) in each model to the total variance
  2. DM Depressed Mood, SC Somatic Complaints, DS Depressive Symptoms, Neg Negative Method, Pos Positive Method, NS Negative Symptoms, DHF Diminished Happiness Feeling, AVE Average variance extracted