Skip to main content

Table 2 Fit indices of the original and measurement invariance across gender models in the total sample for the VIS and VIS-SF scales

From: Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the long (12 items) and short (7 items) forms of the Violent Ideations Scale (VIS) in a non-clinical sample of adolescents

MODEL

(12-İTEM)

Robust TLI

Robust CFI

Robust RMSEA (low-UP)

SRMR

SBχ²

df

Model Comparison

ΔRobust CFI

ΔRobust TLI

ΔSBχ²

Δdf

Pr(> Chisq)

Whole sample (N = 577)

0.947

0.957

0.051 (0.040–0.061)

0.034

133.623

66

 

Config-model

0.973

0.974

0.036 (0.022–0.049)

0.048

71.241

130

Configural vs. metric

0.000

0.002

13.905

11

0.238

Metric-model

0.971

0.974

0.038 (0.023–0.050)

0.047

66.560

119

Metric vs. scalar

0.000

0.002

13.905

11

0.238

Scalar-MODEL

0.973

0.974

0.036 (0.022- 0. 049

0.048

71.241

130

MODEL

(7-İTEM)

Robust TLI

Robust CFI

Robust RMSEA (low-UP)

SRMR

SBχ²

df

Model Comparison

ΔRobust CFI

ΔRobust TLI

ΔSBχ²

Δdf

Pr(> Chisq)

Whole sample (N = 577)

0.957

0.972

0.061

(0.041–0.082)

0.030

72.391

40

 

Config-model

0. 962

0.964

0.058 (0. 039 − 0. 077)

0.049

30.245

40

Configural vs. metric

0.003

0.003

10.982

6

0.08895 (Not-sig)

Metric-model

0. 0.959

0. 967

0.060 (00.40-0.081)

0.047

26.481

34

Metric vs. scalar

0.002

0.003

10.982

6

0.08895 (Not-sig)

Scalar-MODEL

0.962

0.964

0.058 (0.039–0.077)

0.049

30.245

40

  1. Note: CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Steiger-Lind Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardised Root Mean Square Residual; SBχ² = Satorra-Bentler Chi-square