Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistically significant effects for outcomes for which the data provided evidence (proof, indication or hint) of greater or lesser benefit of ST as an add-on to CBT compared with CBT alone (from [9])

From: Systemic therapy in children and adolescents with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Operationalisation

Length of follow-up

Effect measure

Effect esti-mate

95% CI

p-value

Study

Directionof effect

II: Anxietydisorders and obsessive–compulsivedisorders

 No. 6

Overall improvement in clinical condition

CGI-I ≤ 2

Week 14

OR

3.15

[1.10; 8.99]

0.03

Peris et al. [105,106,107,108]

 No. 9

Obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms

CY-BOCS ≤ 14

Week 14

OR

3.81

[1.29; 11.20]

0.01

Peris et al. [105,106,107,108]

 No. 10

Overall functioning

COIS-R

Week 14

Hedges’ g

− 0.75

[− 1.27; − 0.23]

0.004

Peris et al. [105,106,107,108]

  1. ▲ Effect in favour of ST
  2. CI confidence interval, CGI-I Clinical Global Impression – Improvement, COIS-R Child Obsessive Compulsive Impact Scale-Revised, CY-BOCS Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, MD mean difference, No. number, OR odds ratio