Development and initial validation of the cannabis-related psychosis risk literacy scale (CPRL): a multinational psychometric study

Table 3 Measurement Invariance across gender and country in the second subsample

Model	CFI	RMSEA	SRMR	Model Comparison	ΔCFI	ΔRMSEA	ΔSRMR
Model 1: Gender
Males	0.953	0.083	0.039
Females	0.958	0.073	0.036
Configural invariance	0.956	0.053	0.039
Metric invariance	0.955	0.050	0.051	Configural vs. metric	0.001	0.003	0.012
Scalar invariance	0.946	0.051	0.056	Metric vs. scalar	0.009	0.001	0.005
Model 2: Countries
Egypt	0.978	0.056	0.031
Kuwait	0.965	0.073	0.033
Tunisia	0.882	0.085	0.057
Configural invariance	0.959	0.042	0.031
Metric invariance	0.943	0.044	0.035	Configural vs. metric	0.016	0.002	0.004
Scalar invariance	0.899	0.053	0.035	Metric vs. scalar	0.044	0.009	< 0.001

CFI = Comparative fit index; RMSEA = Steiger-Lind root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = Standardised root mean square residual

ISSN: 1471-244X