Skip to main content
Download PDF

Multiple serum anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels in clozapine-treated/naïve patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

BMC Psychiatry volume 24, Article number: 248 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Glutamatergic function abnormalities have been implicated in the etiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), and the efficacy of clozapine may be attributed to its impact on the glutamate system. Recently, evidence has emerged suggesting the involvement of immune processes and increased prevalence of antineuronal antibodies in TRS. This current study aimed to investigate the levels of multiple anti-glutamate receptor antibodies in TRS and explore the effects of clozapine on these antibody levels.

Methods

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure and compare the levels of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies (NMDAR, AMPAR, mGlur3, mGluR5) in clozapine-treated TRS patients (TRS-C, n = 37), clozapine-naïve TRS patients (TRS-NC, n = 39), and non-TRS patients (nTRS, n = 35). Clinical symptom severity was assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), while cognitive function was evaluated using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).

Result

The levels of all four glutamate receptor antibodies in TRS-NC were significantly higher than those in nTRS (p < 0.001) and in TRS-C (p < 0.001), and the antibody levels in TRS-C were comparable to those in nTRS. However, no significant associations were observed between antibody levels and symptom severity or cognitive function across all three groups after FDR correction.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that TRS may related to increased anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and provide further evidence that glutamatergic dysfunction and immune processes may contribute to the pathogenesis of TRS. The impact of clozapine on anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels may be a pharmacological mechanism underlying its therapeutic effects.

Peer Review reports

Background

Approximately 30% of individuals with schizophrenia do not respond to antipsychotic medications, which is known as treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) [1]. TRS is typically defined as schizophrenia that shows inadequate response to at least two different antipsychotics despite adequate treatment according to various guidelines and clinical trials [2, 3]. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of TRS remain elusive. The categorical hypothesis suggests that the pathophysiology of TRS may differ significantly from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (nTRS), making conventional antipsychotics ineffective [4]. Previous studies have demonstrated that TRS is associated with deficits in glutamatergic function [5, 6]. Among available treatments, clozapine is the only effective option for TRS. While the exact mechanisms of its therapeutic effects are still not fully understood, emerging evidence suggests that clozapine may exert its efficacy through modulation of the glutamatergic system, in contrast to most other antipsychotics that primarily act through dopamine-2 receptor blockade [7, 8]. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies have shown that there are some patients who have limited response to high levels of dopamine receptor blockade, and reduced dopamine levels were not effective for TRS [9, 10]. Furthermore, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) contributes to better observation of glutamatergic systems dysfunction of TRS. Previous studies have shown that glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in TRS are higher than in nTRS, while no group differences were found in striatal dopamine function [11]. Hence, according to the categorical hypothesis, TRS may be a specific subtype of schizophrenia, which is more related to the dysfunction of the glutamatergic system rather than the dopaminergic system.

Additionally, complex interactions between the immune system and the brain have been implicated in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders [12]. In addition to neurotransmitter-based hypotheses such as the glutamatergic hypothesis, there is evidence suggesting immune dysregulation in schizophrenia [7]. Lin’s study in 1998 first linked TRS to activation of the inflammatory response system, showing significantly elevated serum IL-6 levels in TRS compared to controls and nTRS [13]. Subsequent studies have also reported increased levels of SIL-1RA, IL-2, IL-10, STNF-R1, STNF-R2, IL-8, chemokine ligand (CCL)-3, and CCL-2 in TRS [14,15,16,17,18].

Neurotransmitters and the immune system are not isolated and independent, but they interact with each other, and antineuronal antibodies can serve as a bridge connecting these two systems [19]. On one hand, autoimmune diseases have been identified as risk factors for schizophrenia [20]. On one hand, autoimmune diseases have been identified as risk factors for schizophrenia [21]. Bechter proposed the “mild encephalitis hypothesis,” suggesting that certain severe mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, may be attributed to chronic low-level neuroinflammation [22]. In 2007, Dalmau et al. first described autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies against NMDA-type glutamate receptors [23, 24]. Aside from neurological symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive impairment are also common features of autoimmune encephalitides [25]. In some reported cases, patients may initially present with isolated psychiatric episodes [26, 27]. These findings suggest the potential involvement of glutamate receptor antibodies in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Previous studies have demonstrated that blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity is compromised in individuals with schizophrenia, leading to increased permeability [28, 29]. As a result, circulating glutamate receptor antibodies may penetrate the damaged BBB, bind to their corresponding receptors in the central nervous system, disrupt glutamate receptor function, and ultimately contribute to the manifestation of psychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment.

Several studies have investigated the prevalence and serum levels of glutamate receptor antibodies in individuals with schizophrenia. Previous studies primarily focused on NMDA receptor antibodies and utilized immunofluorescence as the detection method [25, 30, 31]. However, the results from these studies are qualitative and have yielded mixed findings. In 2019, Tong et al. conducted the first study to employ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting NMDAR antibody levels in patients with schizophrenia [32]. They observed elevated serum NMDA receptor antibody levels in first-episode schizophrenia patients compared to healthy controls, which were also correlated with symptom severity. Subsequently, ELISA was further utilized in two additional studies by the same group. They revealed significantly higher serum NMDA receptor antibody levels in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia compared to those with non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia, which were also associated with white matter deficits [33]. Another study demonstrated elevated antibody levels in schizophrenic patients with tardive dyskinesia [34].

Autoantibodies targeting glutamate receptors offer a valuable means to connect the two fundamental hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, namely the glutamatergic dysfunction hypothesis and the neuroimmunological hypothesis [19]. Moreover, most current studies investigating the association between glutamate receptors and schizophrenia have primarily focused on the NMDA-type receptor, while the involvement of other types of glutamate receptors in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia has gained increasing attention in recent years. Additionally, a speculation has emerged suggesting that TRS may represent a population enriched for the presence of anti-neuronal antibodies [35]. Furthermore, it has been discovered that clozapine can induce secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) [36, 37]. Consequently, researchers have proposed the possibility that clozapine exerts its therapeutic effects in TRS by reducing anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels [37]. Given the limited number of studies exploring the relationship between TRS, glutamate receptor antibodies, and clozapine, this study aimed to investigate multiple glutamate receptor antibody levels in TRS patients with and without clozapine treatment. We hypothesized that patients with TRS may exhibit elevated antibody levels and that clozapine can ameliorate clinical symptoms and cognitive impairment by reducing these levels and upregulating glutamate receptor function.

Materials and methods

Participants

Participants were recruited from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2020 to 2022. The inclusion criteria required that participants were right-handed, aged between 18 and 50, and met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for schizophrenia. The exclusion criteria for all participants were (1) substance abuse, (2) a history of head trauma resulting in loss of consciousness, or (3) major medical or neurological illness.

We reviewed the medical records of all patients and classified TRS patients versus nTRS patients based on their previous responses to antipsychotics. According to the consensus guidelines published by the Treatment Response and Resistance to Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group in 2017, TRS was defined as schizophrenia that had poor response (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale>60, Global Assessment of Functioning ≤60) to two different adequate doses (dosage equivalence of chlorpromazine ≥600 mg/day) and courses (≥6 weeks) of non-clozapine antipsychotics [3]. To make sure that after adequate treatment patients still had disabling symptoms due to resistance to antipsychotics, we also excluded patients due to intolerance to antipsychotics. Although clozapine is recommended as the gold standard treatment for TRS in all clinical guidelines, its use is frequently declined by patients and their guardians in clinical practice due to its potential side effects. As a result, these patients often continue maintenance treatment with other atypical antipsychotic medications instead of using clozapine as monotherapy. Therefore, we further divided TRS patients into two groups according to whether clozapine was applied (≥ 200 mg/day， ≥ 12-week duration) or not. Ultimately, a total of 111 patients were included and divided into three groups: clozapine-treated patients with TRS (TRS-C), clozapine-naïve patients with TRS (TRS-NC) and clozapine-naïve patients with nTRS (nTRS). This study was approved by the Second Xiangya Hospital Ethics Committee (No. S006, 2018), and all participants fully understood the research procedures and provided written informed consent.

Clinical evaluation

Clinical evaluation was performed independently by two experienced senior psychiatrists. The severity of illness was assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF). Neurocognition assessment instrument was the Chinese version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), which contains a total of seven domains: (1) Speed of processing; (2) Attention/vigilance; (3) Working memory; (4) Verbal learning; (5) Visual learning; (6) Reasoning and problem solving and; (7) Social cognition.

Measurement of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies

On the day of enrollment or the next morning, fasting venous blood was collected and placed in a non-anticoagulant vacuum tube. The blood samples were rested and centrifuged (3000 rpm for 10 minutes), and the serum was extracted and stored in an ultra-low temperature refrigerator (− 80 °C). Serum anti-NMDAR antibody, anti-AMPAR antibody, anti-mGluR3 antibody, and anti-mGluR5 antibody levels were measured by double antigen sandwich ELISA method using commercially available kits (FANKEW, Shanghai, China). Each sample was tested twice, and the final results were averaged from the two assay values. Intra-and inter-assay variation coefficients of anti-NMDAR antibody were < 4.5 and < 6.7%; intra-and inter-assay variation coefficients of anti-AMPAR antibody were < 5.0 and < 7.5%; intra-and inter-assay variation coefficients of anti-mGluR3 antibody were < 4.2 and < 6.4%; intra-and inter-assay variation coefficients of anti-mGluR5 antibody were < 4.4 and < 6.6%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 25 IBM Inc. New York, USA). Means ± standard deviations (X ± S) were used for measurement data. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. After obtaining MCCB row scores, standard score-T score conversion was performed. One-way ANOVA or chi-square test was used to statistically analyze the demographic data such as gender, age, PANSS score, duration of disease, medication dose, and MCCB score among the three groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the levels of various anti-glutamate receptor antibodies in the three groups did not fall into a normal distribution; therefore, Spearman correlations were used to analyze the antibody levels with PANSS scores, MCCB scores, and clozapine dose. Due to the differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and their potential associations with antibody levels, we included years of education, duration of illness, medication, PANSS total scores, MCCB scores as covariates, and the generalized linear model (GLM) was used to compare the differences in antibody levels among the groups. FDR correction was performed for multiple comparisons.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Thirty-seven patients with TRS-C, 39 patients with TRS-NC and 35 patients with nTRS were included in this study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in gender composition and age among the three groups. After post hoc comparison, it was found that the years of education in the nTRS group were higher than those in the TRS-NC (p = 0.014) and TRS-C groups (p = 0.002); the duration of disease in the TRS-C group was longer than that in the nTRS group (p = 0.005); the dose of medication in the TRS-NC group was greater than that in the nTRS group (p = 0.007). Due to the differences in years of education, course of disease, and dosage of medication among the three groups, we further conducted correlation analyses between these indicators and serum glutamate receptor antibody levels in the following.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics and antibody levels of clozapine-treated patients with TRS, clozapine-naïve patients with TRS and clozapine-naïve patients with nTRS
Full size table

The two TRS groups had higher illness severity (i.e. PANSS total and subscale scores, as well as GAF scores) compared to the NTRS group. Compared TRS-NC patients, TRS-C patients had lower total PANSS (p = 0.019) and PANSS positive sub-scores (p = 0.012), and higher GAF scores (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in PANSS-negative sub-scores and general sub-scores between the two TRS groups.

Except for the reasoning and problem-solving domain, significant differences were observed among the three groups in the six sub-items and the total scores of MCCB. Post hoc comparisons revealed that the nTRS group had higher scores than the TRS-NC group in the other six sub-items (all ps < 0.05), as well as in attention/vigilance (p = 0.003) and visual learning (p < 0.001) compared to the TRS-C group. The TRS-C group showed significantly higher scores than the TRS-NC group in speed of processing (p = 0.008), working memory (p = 0.010), and social cognition (p = 0.021). Furthermore, the nTRS group obtained the highest total score, followed by the two TRS groups. The nTRS group had a significantly higher total score than the TRS-C group (p = 0.012), and the TRS-C group had a significantly higher total score than the TRS-NC group (p = 0.007) (Table 1).

Group comparisons of anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels

The levels of the four anti-glutamate receptor antibodies were compared between the three groups using a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) with years of education, duration of illness, medication, PANSS total scores, MCCB scores included as covariates. All the above comparisons were adjusted using FDR correction. There were no main effects of the covariates was reported.

The anti-NMDAR antibody levels were significantly higher in the TRS-NC group than in the TRS-C group (p < 0.001) and the nTRS group (p < 0.001), and there was no significant difference between the TRS-C and nTRS groups (p = 0.638) (Table 1, Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Serum anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels (mean and SD) of TRS-C, TRS-nC and nTRS. Abbreviations: TRS-C, clozapine-naïve patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia; TRS-nC, clozapine-naïve patients with non-treatment resistant schizophrenia; nTRS, clozapine-naïve patients with non-treatment resistant schizophrenia; NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor; AMPAR, Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor; mGluR, Metabotropic glutamate receptor; Ab, antibody. ***p < .001

Full size image

The anti-AMPAR antibody levels were significantly higher in the TRS-NC group than in the other two groups (ps < 0.001). The levels of the TRS-C group were higher than of the nTRS group before the correction (p < 0.032, FDR-corrected q = 0.128 > 0.05) (Table 1, Fig. 1B).

The anti-mGluR3 antibody levels in the TRS-NC group were significantly higher than that in the other two groups (ps < 0.001), and there was no significant difference between the TRS-C and nTRS groups (p = 0.105) (Table 1, Fig. 1C).

Similar to the other antibodies, the TRS-NC group had the highest anti-mGluR5 antibody levels compared with the other two groups (p’s < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the TRS-C and nTRS groups (p = 0.502) (Table 1, Fig. 1D).

Relationship between anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and symptom severity

In the TRS-C group, no significant correlations were found between the anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and PANSS scores (all ps > 0.05); in the TRS-NC group, PANSS-general sub-scores were positively correlated with anti-NMDAR antibody levels (r = 0.414, p = 0.009, FDR-corrected q = 0.072 > 0.05) and anti-mGluR3 antibody levels (r = 0.443, p = 0.005, FDR-corrected q = 0.08 > 0.05); in the In the nTRS group, general symptom scale scores were positively correlated with anti-NMDAR antibody levels (r = 0.438, p = 0.008, FDR-corrected q = 0.128 > 0.05) and anti-mGluR5 antibody levels (r = 0.389, p = 0.021, FDR-corrected q = 0.168 > 0.05) (Fig. 2). However, the above correlations failed to pass the FDR correction.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlations between serum anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and PANSS-G scores in clozapine-naïve patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia. Abbreviations: NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor; mGluR, Metabotropic glutamate receptor; Ab, antibody; PANSS-G, General Psychopathology scale

Full size image

Relationship between anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and cognitive function

In the TRS-C group, no significant correlations were found between the levels of the four anti-glutamate receptor antibodies and MCCB scores (all ps > 0.05); in the TRS-NC group, anti-NMDAR antibody levels showed significant negative correlations with working memory scores (r = − 0.342, p = 0.033, FDR-corrected q = 0.352 > 0.05) and total scores (r = − 0.374, p = 0.019, FDR-corrected q = 0.608 > 0.05), anti-AMPAR antibody levels showed negative correlations with visual learning scores (r = − 0.373, p = 0.019, FDR-corrected q = 0.304 > 0.05) and total scores (r = − 0.320, p = 0.049, FDR-corrected q = 0.314 > 0.05), and anti-mGluR5 antibody levels showed negative correlations with visual learning scores(r = − 0.327, p = 0.042, FDR-corrected q = 0.336 > 0.05); in the NTRS group, anti-NMDAR antibody levels showed negative correlations with reasoning and problem solving scores (r = − 0.360, p = 0.034, FDR-corrected q = 0.544 > 0.05), and anti-mGluR5 antibody levels was negatively correlated with reasoning and problem solving scores(r = − 0.372, p = 0.028, FDR-corrected q = 0.896 > 0.05). However, all of these findings did not pass the FDR correction.

Relationship between anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and clozapine dose

We also explored the relationship between anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and clozapine doses in the TRS-C group. No relationship between anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels and clozapine dose were identified.

Discussion

The aim of our study was to compare serum levels of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies between patients with TRS and nTRS patients, and to investigate the impact of clozapine on antibody levels. Currently, there is limited research on anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels in TRS. Only one study directly measured serum anti-NMDAR antibody concentrations in TRS patients using ELISA, and our study’s results were consistent with that study, indicating that increased anti-NMDAR antibody levels are associated with antipsychotic drug resistance [33]. Additionally, this study measured the concentrations of several other serum anti-glutamate receptor antibodies for the first time, and the results were similar to those of anti-NMDAR antibodies, demonstrating that TRS patients have higher serum anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels compared to nTRS patients. Furthermore, the study found that TRS-C group patients had lower levels of anti-glutamate receptors, milder positive symptoms, and partially improved cognitive function compared to patients in the TRS-nC group. These findings collectively suggest that TRS may be linked to elevated levels of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies, and clozapine may alleviate clinical symptoms and cognitive deficits that are resistant to other antipsychotics by normalizing the levels of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies.

Extensive research has demonstrated the involvement of NMDAR dysfunction in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, which is widely associated with psychotic symptoms and cognitive impairment [38]. Besides, a case has been reported that a female patient who had schizophrenia after remission of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and NMDA receptor antibody was not detected in the episodes, which inferred that NMDA receptor antibody might induce a long-term dysfunction on NMDA receptor and reduce the threshold for the onset of schizophrenia [39]. In addition to NMDAR dysfunction, AMPAR dysfunction mentioned in this study has been associated with selective attention and memory impairment in schizophrenia [40]. Activation of mGluR3 in the prefrontal cortex plays a crucial role in working memory and cognition [41], and genetic variations in GRM3, the gene encoding mGlu3, have been linked to schizophrenia and cognitive deficits [42]. The knockout of mGluR5 in mice has been shown to result in defects in prepulse inhibition, serving as a deficit model for schizophrenia [43]. Agonists targeting mGluRs have emerged as new candidates for antipsychotic drug development. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of both mGluR3 and mGluR5 agonists in schizophrenia, including the improvement of negative symptoms and cognitive deficits that are often unresponsive to current antipsychotics [44, 45]. Consistent with our hypotheses, TRS patients exhibit higher levels of various anti-glutamate receptor antibodies that disrupt glutamate receptor function, resulting in more severe symptoms and cognitive deficits compared to nTRS patients. In contrast, current antipsychotic drugs primarily target dopamine receptors and have limited effects on negative symptoms and cognitive impairment, which are significant contributors to treatment resistance.

However, current studies on the prevalence of anti-NMDAR antibodies in individuals with schizophrenia seem to show controversial results. Most of the studies on anti-NMDAR antibody detection showed negative results. Besides, there have been some researches investigating the prevalence of AMPA-type antibodies, however, no significant difference between patients and healthy controls in the prevalence was found [25, 30, 46]. This might be attributed to that the two main current methods, immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays, were relatively insensitive to human antibodies [47]. Consistent with our study, the previous studies using ELISA have found that higher anti-NMDA antibody levels in patients with TRS and other subtypes of schizophrenia compared with healthy individuals [32,33,34]. Hence, the development of more sensitive methods is urgent. In addition, although autoimmune mechanisms and other glutamate receptor dysfunction are crucial for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, to our knowledge, the current studies on glutamate receptors and schizophrenia have mostly focused on NMDA-type. In this study, we emphasized that the types of anti-glutamate antibodies associated with schizophrenia were not limited to the NMDA-type. Indeed, there have been cases reported that some novel autoantibodies, such as glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) antibodies, were found in patients with schizophrenia [48]. Broadening the types of autoantibodies related to schizophrenia may be essential for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

The results of our study provide further evidence that clozapine may modulate the function of anti-glutamate receptors by reducing antibody levels, which could be one of the therapeutic mechanisms that distinguish clozapine from other antipsychotics. This finding is supported by a previous study that reported significantly lower immunoglobulin levels in the clozapine-treated group compared to the clozapine-naive group [36]. Moreover, this cross-sectional study revealed a significant association between the duration of clozapine treatment and the extent of reduction in serum IgG levels [36]. In recent years, there have been speculations regarding the link between clozapine and systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD), further supporting the possibility of this being a therapeutic mechanism of clozapine [36, 37, 49]. However, there is a limited number of studies, primarily consisting of isolated case reports, that demonstrate reduced autoantibody titers and symptom improvement in TRS patients with serum anti-NMDAR antibodies after clozapine administration [50].

The mechanism by which clozapine reduces anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels is currently unknown. It has been reported that dopamine D1 receptors are the main receptor type expressed by tonsillar B cells [51], and researchers have speculated that the underlying mechanism is related to the antagonistic effect of antipsychotic drugs on dopaminergic signaling in the germinal center [37]. However, this speculation also suggests that other antipsychotics should exhibit a stronger antagonistic effect than clozapine. Despite this, both previous studies and our current study consistently demonstrate lower antibody levels in the clozapine-treated group. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore the exact mechanism by which clozapine affects antibody levels and to investigate the effects of other antipsychotics on antibodies. In our study, no correlation was observed between clozapine dose and any of the anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels. This may be due to most patients in the clozapine-treated group receiving combination treatment with other antipsychotics, thereby limiting the ability to control for the effects of those medications. Additionally, individual variations in factors such as metabolism, smoking, gender, and concomitant use of other drugs can lead to different blood levels of clozapine, resulting in variations in the degree of antibody alteration [52, 53].

After applying the FDR correction, there was no evidence of a correlation between antibody concentrations and symptom severity or cognitive function in any of the three patient groups. This finding may be attributed to the exploratory nature of the study with its small sample size, which may render the multiple comparison correction excessively stringent. A similar study examining serum NMDAR antibodies in patients with TRS, nTRS, and treatment initiation schizophrenia (1. first-episode schizophrenia; 2. total duration of illness ≤3 years; and 3. within 2 weeks of initiation of antipsychotic medication), observed a correlation between antibody levels and symptom severity only in the treatment initiation schizophrenia group [33]. Long-term antipsychotic use also affects neurotransmitter mechanisms beyond glutamate, rendering the correlation between antibody levels and symptoms non-significant [33]. Additionally, generalized deficits in cognitive function in schizophrenia involve numerous possible mechanisms and other neurotransmitters, such as abnormalities in GABA, which may be associated with alterations in gamma oscillatory activity in the prefrontal cortex and subsequent working memory disturbances [54]. In the TRS-C group, no correlation was found between cognitive function, symptom severity, and the levels of the four antibodies. This may be due to the complex mechanism of action of clozapine, which not only affects glutamate antibody levels but also enhances the function of glutamate receptors, including NMDAR, through various mechanisms such as blocking glycine uptake, increasing glycine site occupancy, and interacting with mGluR5 receptors [55,56,57,58]. Furthermore, clozapine can also act on other receptors, including muscarinic, histamine, and serotonin receptors.

This study has certain limitations. Firstly, as a cross-sectional study, it is difficult to establish causal relationships. Due to the specific characteristics of the study population, the sample size is relatively small, and it was challenging to recruit three groups of participants who were matched in terms of illness duration, education level, and medication. Therefore, in data analysis, we employed included covariates rigorously to mitigate their influence. Additionally, the use of clozapine in clinical practice is relatively conservative, with patients being more inclined to choose higher doses of other antipsychotic medications or to add low doses of clozapine. Consequently, it was difficult to recruit patients who received clozapine monotherapy. The initiation of clozapine treatment is often delayed, and the participants had a longer illness duration, leading to several confounding factors that are difficult to exclude. Therefore, future studies should consider including healthy controls and patients with first-episode schizophrenia and conduct longitudinal research to further validate the results of this study.

Conclusions

In summary, our study found a correlation between increased levels of anti-glutamate receptor antibodies and TRS, and the types of antibodies were not limited to the NMDA-type. Furthermore, we discovered that clozapine may have the ability to reduce these antibody levels in TRS patients. These findings provide supporting evidence for both the hypothesis of glutamatergic dysfunction and the neuroimmunological hypothesis. Additionally, our results propose that the superior efficacy of clozapine may be attributed, at least in part, to its effect on anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanism by which clozapine reduces antibody levels, large-scale longitudinal studies and research using animal models are essential. Moreover, schizophrenia researches related to novel antibody types, development of more sensitive methods, and treatment for abnormal antibody levels are urgently needed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mouchlianitis E, McCutcheon R, Howes OD. Brain-imaging studies of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(5):451–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagner E, Kane JM, Correll CU, Howes O, Siskind D, Honer WG, Lee J, Falkai P, Schneider-Axmann T, Hasan A. Clozapine combination and augmentation strategies in patients with schizophrenia -recommendations from an international expert survey among the treatment response and resistance in psychosis (TRRIP) working group. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46(6):1459–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Howes OD, McCutcheon R, Agid O, de Bartolomeis A, van Beveren NJ, Birnbaum ML, Bloomfield MA, Bressan RA, Buchanan RW, Carpenter WT, et al. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia: treatment response and resistance in psychosis (TRRIP) working group consensus guidelines on diagnosis and terminology. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(3):216–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Howes OD, Kapur S. A neurobiological hypothesis for the classification of schizophrenia: type a (hyperdopaminergic) and type B (normodopaminergic). Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(1):1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demjaha A, Egerton A, Murray RM, Kapur S, Howes OD, Stone JM, McGuire PK. Antipsychotic treatment resistance in schizophrenia associated with elevated glutamate levels but normal dopamine function. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(5):e11–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein ME, Anderson VM, Pillai A, Kydd RR, Russell BR. Glutamatergic neurometabolites in clozapine-responsive and -resistant schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18(6).

  7. Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR. Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10(1):40–68 image 45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goff DC, Coyle JT. The emerging role of glutamate in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(9):1367–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Remington G, Kapur S, Foussias G, Agid O, Mann S, Borlido C, Richards S, Javaid N. Tetrabenazine augmentation in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(1):95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demjaha A, Murray RM, McGuire PK, Kapur S, Howes OD. Dopamine synthesis capacity in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(11):1203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Egerton A, Murphy A, Donocik J, Anton A, Barker GJ, Collier T, Deakin B, Drake R, Eliasson E, Emsley R, et al. Dopamine and glutamate in antipsychotic-responsive compared with antipsychotic-nonresponsive psychosis: a multicenter positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy study (STRATA). Schizophr Bull. 2021;47(2):505–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khandaker GM, Cousins L, Deakin J, Lennox BR, Yolken R, Jones PB. Inflammation and immunity in schizophrenia: implications for pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(3):258–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin A, Kenis G, Bignotti S, Tura GJ, De Jong R, Bosmans E, Pioli R, Altamura C, Scharpé S, Maes M. The inflammatory response system in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: increased serum interleukin-6. Schizophr Res. 1998;32(1):9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Noto C, Ota VK, Santoro ML, Ortiz BB, Rizzo LB, Higuchi CH, Cordeiro Q, Belangero SI, Bressan RA, Gadelha A, et al. Effects of depression on the cytokine profile in drug naïve first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2015;164(1–3):53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maes M, Bocchio Chiavetto L, Bignotti S, Battisa Tura GJ, Pioli R, Boin F, Kenis G, Bosmans E, de Jongh R, Altamura CA. Increased serum interleukin-8 and interleukin-10 in schizophrenic patients resistant to treatment with neuroleptics and the stimulatory effects of clozapine on serum leukemia inhibitory factor receptor. Schizophr Res. 2002;54(3):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang XY, Zhou DF, Cao LY, Zhang PY, Wu GY, Shen YC. Changes in serum interleukin-2, −6, and −8 levels before and during treatment with risperidone and haloperidol: relationship to outcome in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(7):940–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boll KM, Noto C, Bonifácio KL, Bortolasci CC, Gadelha A, Bressan RA, Barbosa DS, Maes M, Moreira EG. Oxidative and nitrosative stress biomarkers in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2017;253:43–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maes M, Bocchio Chiavetto L, Bignotti S, Battisa Tura G, Pioli R, Boin F, Kenis G, Bosmans E, de Jongh R, Lin A, et al. Effects of atypical antipsychotics on the inflammatory response system in schizophrenic patients resistant to treatment with typical neuroleptics. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2000;10(2):119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steiner J, Schiltz K, Bernstein HG, Bogerts B. Antineuronal antibodies against neurotransmitter receptors and synaptic proteins in schizophrenia: current knowledge and clinical implications. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(3):197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benros ME, Nielsen PR, Nordentoft M, Eaton WW, Dalton SO, Mortensen PB. Autoimmune diseases and severe infections as risk factors for schizophrenia: a 30-year population-based register study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1303–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ezeoke A, Mellor A, Buckley P, Miller B. A systematic, quantitative review of blood autoantibodies in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013;150(1):245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bechter K. Updating the mild encephalitis hypothesis of schizophrenia. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;42:71–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai M, Hughes EG, Peng X, Zhou L, Gleichman AJ, Shu H, Matà S, Kremens D, Vitaliani R, Geschwind MD, et al. AMPA receptor antibodies in limbic encephalitis alter synaptic receptor location. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(4):424–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Titulaer MJ, Boulos M, Weaver S, Antoine JC, Liebers E, Kornblum C, Bien CG, Honnorat J, et al. Antibodies to metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the Ophelia syndrome. Neurology. 2011;77(18):1698–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lennox BR, Palmer-Cooper EC, Pollak T, Hainsworth J, Marks J, Jacobson L, Lang B, Fox H, Ferry B, Scoriels L, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of serum neuronal cell surface antibodies in first-episode psychosis: a case-control study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(1):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kayser MS, Titulaer MJ, Gresa-Arribas N, Dalmau J. Frequency and characteristics of isolated psychiatric episodes in anti–N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(9):1133–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Graus F, Boronat A, Xifró X, Boix M, Svigelj V, García A, Palomino A, Sabater L, Alberch J, Saiz A. The expanding clinical profile of anti-AMPA receptor encephalitis. Neurology. 2010;74(10):857–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeppesen R, Orlovska-Waast S, Sørensen NV, Christensen RHB, Benros ME. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers of Neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier in psychotic disorders and individually matched healthy controls. Schizophr Bull. 2022;48.

  29. Pollak TA, Drndarski S, Stone JM, David AS, McGuire P, Abbott NJ. The blood-brain barrier in psychosis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):79–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steiner J, Walter M, Glanz W, Sarnyai Z, Bernstein HG, Vielhaber S, Kästner A, Skalej M, Jordan W, Schiltz K, et al. Increased prevalence of diverse N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor antibodies in patients with an initial diagnosis of schizophrenia: specific relevance of IgG NR1a antibodies for distinction from N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor encephalitis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(3):271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haussleiter IS, Emons B, Schaub M, Borowski K, Brüne M, Wandinger KP, Juckel G. Investigation of antibodies against synaptic proteins in a cross-sectional cohort of psychotic patients. Schizophr Res. 2012;140(1–3):258–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tong J, Huang J, Luo X, Chen S, Cui Y, An H, Xiu M, Tan S, Wang Z, Yuan Y, et al. Elevated serum anti-NMDA receptor antibody levels in first-episode patients with schizophrenia. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;81:213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tong J, Zhou Y, Huang J, Zhang P, Fan F, Chen S, Tian B, Cui Y, Tian L, Tan S, et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody and white matter deficits in schizophrenia treatment-resistance. Schizophr Bull. 2021;47(5):1463–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Li N, Huang J, Zhang P, Tong J, Chen S, Cui Y, Tan S, Wang Z, Tian B, Li CR, et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody and the choroid plexus in schizophrenia patients with tardive dyskinesia. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;142:290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Colijn MA, Ismail Z. Clinically relevant anti-neuronal cell surface antibodies in schizophrenia Spectrum disorders. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;78(2):70–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ponsford M, Castle D, Tahir T, Robinson R, Wade W, Steven R, Bramhall K, Moody M, Carne E, Ford C, et al. Clozapine is associated with secondary antibody deficiency. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;214(2):1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ponsford MJ, Pecoraro A, Jolles S. Clozapine-associated secondary antibody deficiency. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;19(6):553–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Uno Y, Coyle JT. Glutamate hypothesis in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73(5):204–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yasuda K, Uenishi S, Sakamoto H, Hori K, Koh J, Takahashi S. Schizophrenia after remission of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Asian J Psychiatr. 2022;70:103027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kilonzo K, Strahnen D, Prex V, Gems J, van der Veen B, Kapanaiah SKT, Murthy BKB, Schulz S, Sprengel R, Bannerman D, et al. Distinct contributions of GluA1-containing AMPA receptors of different hippocampal subfields to salience processing, memory and impulse control. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Walker AG, Wenthur CJ, Xiang Z, Rook JM, Emmitte KA, Niswender CM, Lindsley CW, Conn PJ. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 activation is required for long-term depression in medial prefrontal cortex and fear extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(4):1196–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Egan MF, Straub RE, Goldberg TE, Yakub I, Callicott JH, Hariri AR, Mattay VS, Bertolino A, Hyde TM, Shannon-Weickert C, et al. Variation in GRM3 affects cognition, prefrontal glutamate, and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(34):12604–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Brody SA, Dulawa SC, Conquet F, Geyer MA. Assessment of a prepulse inhibition deficit in a mutant mouse lacking mGlu5 receptors. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9(1):35–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Régio Brambilla C, Veselinović T, Rajkumar R, Mauler J, Orth L, Ruch A, Ramkiran S, Heekeren K, Kawohl W, Wyss C, et al. mGluR5 receptor availability is associated with lower levels of negative symptoms and better cognition in male patients with chronic schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(10):2762–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Moreno JL, Sealfon SC, González-Maeso J. Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors and schizophrenia. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(23):3777–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen CH, Cheng MC, Liu CM, Liu CC, Lin KH, Hwu HG. Seroprevalence survey of selective anti-neuronal autoantibodies in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2017;190:28–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Masdeu JC. Detecting synaptic autoantibodies in psychoses: need for more sensitive methods. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(3):317–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hansen N, Bartels C, Teegen B, Wiltfang J, Malchow B. Catatonic schizophrenia associated with cerebrospinal GAD65 autoantibodies: case report and literature review. Front Immunol. 2022;13:829058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lozano R, Marin R, Santacruz MJ, Pascual A. Selective immunoglobulin M deficiency among clozapine-treated patients: a nested case-control study. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015;17(4).

  50. Beck K, Lally J, Shergill SS, Bloomfield MA, MacCabe JH, Gaughran F, Howes OD. Prevalence of serum N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor autoantibodies in refractory psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206(2):164–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Papa I, Saliba D, Ponzoni M, Bustamante S, Canete PF, Gonzalez-Figueroa P, McNamara HA, Valvo S, Grimbaldeston M, Sweet RA, et al. T(FH)-derived dopamine accelerates productive synapses in germinal centres. Nature. 2017;547(7663):318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Augustin M, Schoretsanitis G, Pfeifer P, Gründer G, Liebe C, Paulzen M. Effect of fluvoxamine augmentation and smoking on clozapine serum concentrations. Schizophr Res. 2019;210:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mayerova M, Ustohal L, Jarkovsky J, Pivnicka J, Kasparek T, Ceskova E. Influence of dose, gender, and cigarette smoking on clozapine plasma concentrations. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:1535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Dienel SJ, Lewis DA. Alterations in cortical interneurons and cognitive function in schizophrenia. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;131:104208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schwieler L, Linderholm KR, Nilsson-Todd LK, Erhardt S, Engberg G. Clozapine interacts with the glycine site of the NMDA receptor: electrophysiological studies of dopamine neurons in the rat ventral tegmental area. Life Sci. 2008;83(5–6):170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Javitt DC, Duncan L, Balla A, Sershen H. Inhibition of system A-mediated glycine transport in cortical synaptosomes by therapeutic concentrations of clozapine: implications for mechanisms of action. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10(3):275–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gray L, van den Buuse M, Scarr E, Dean B, Hannan AJ. Clozapine reverses schizophrenia-related behaviours in the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 knockout mouse: association with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor up-regulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;12(1):45–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Veerman SR, Schulte PF, Begemann MJ, Engelsbel F, de Haan L. Clozapine augmented with glutamate modulators in refractory schizophrenia: a review and metaanalysis. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2014;47(6):185–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National key R & D Program of China to JT (Nos.2022YFE0103700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82171495 and 81871057 to JT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Jingqi He, Zhangyin He, Yanhui Liao & Jinsong Tang

  2. Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China

    Jingqi He, Jinguang Li, Yisen Wei, Junyu Liu, Honghong Ren & Xiaogang Chen

  3. Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Jinguang Li

  4. Department of Psychiatry, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China

    Yisen Wei

  5. School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

    Zhangyin He

  6. Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, China

    Junyu Liu

  7. Hunan Provincial Brain Hospital (The second people’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China

    Ning Yuan & Jinsong Tang

  8. The Ninth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, China

    Risheng Zhou & Xingtao He

  9. Department of Psychiatry, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Honghong Ren

  10. RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan

    Lin Gu

  11. Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Lin Gu

  12. Zigong Mental Health Center, Zigong, China

    Jinsong Tang

Authors
  1. Jingqi He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinguang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yisen Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhangyin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ning Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Risheng Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xingtao He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Honghong Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lin Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yanhui Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Xiaogang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jinsong Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JT and XC designed the study. JH, YW, ZH, NY, JL, RZ, and XH collected the samples and clinical information. JH analyzed and discussed the experimental result, wrote the main manuscript text and prepared Figs. 1-2. LG, JT, and YL performed manuscript revision, reviewed the draft, and contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaogang Chen or Jinsong Tang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Approval was granted by the Second Xiangya Hospital Ethics Committee (No. S006, 2018). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Li, J., Wei, Y. et al. Multiple serum anti-glutamate receptor antibody levels in clozapine-treated/naïve patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 24, 248 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05689-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05689-0

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us