Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Biederman |
| 8 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Goodman |
| 19 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip J Asherson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Biederman |
| 28 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Goodman |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 23 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip J Asherson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip J Asherson |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-10-67 |
You can find further information about peer review here.