Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Effectiveness of an intercultural module added to the treatment guidelines for Moroccan and Turkish patients with depressive and anxiety disorders

  • 1Email author,
  • 1, 4,
  • 2, 3 and
  • 1, 4
BMC Psychiatry201111:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-13

  • Received: 7 December 2010
  • Accepted: 19 January 2011
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Since the sixties of the last century, many people from Morocco and Turkey have migrated into the Netherlands. In the last decade, Moroccan and Turkish patients have found their way to organizations for mental health care. However, they often drop out of treatment. Problems in the communication with therapists and different expectations regarding treatment seem to be causal factors for the early drop-out of therapy. In the Netherlands as in other countries courses have been developed for training cultural competence of therapists. Yet, up to now, the effectiveness of increased cultural competence of therapists in reducing drop-out of treatment has not been studied.

Methods/Design

A randomized clinical trial was started in January 2010. Moroccan and Turkish adult patients who are referred to our outpatient clinics for mood and anxiety disorders are randomly assigned to mental health workers who are trained in a cultural module and to those who are not. The therapists have been trained in the Cultural Formulation and in techniques bridging the (cultural) gap between them and their Moroccan and Turkish patients.

The target number of participants is 150 patients, 75 for each group. Drop-out of treatment is the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are no-show and patients' perspective of care.

Discussion

The study will give an answer to the question whether increasing cultural competence of therapists reduces drop-out of treatment in Moroccan and Turkish outpatients with depressive and anxiety disorders.

Trial Registration

The Dutch Cochrane Centre, NTR1989

Keywords

  • Anxiety Disorder
  • Mental Health Care
  • Cultural Competence
  • Composite International Diagnostic Interview
  • Beck Anxiety Inventory

Background

Since the beginning of the 1960 s, large groups of male labour immigrants from Morocco and Turkey have come to the Netherlands. In the beginning they left their wives and children behind to be cared for by relatives, later they reunited with their families in the Netherlands. They settled down in the large cities such as Amsterdam, because relatively more unskilled labour jobs were available there. After the reunion with the families there was a decrease in immigration of this kind of immigrants around 1985. However, the migration from Morocco and Turkey unexpectedly rose again because children of the immigrants often married men or women from Morocco or Turkey. This contributed to a prolonged migration. As a result there is a first, a second and a third generation although it is hard to strictly separate these generations [1, 2]. In 2010 about 349.000 Moroccans and 384.000 Turkish (first and second generation) reside in The Netherlands [3]. In Amsterdam 9.0% is of Moroccan and 5.2% of the population is of Turkish descent [4]. The Moroccan and Turkish population form the largest group of immigrants in the Netherlands as well as in Amsterdam.

It is known that migration can be a stressful process that can lead to mental illness [5, 5]. Previous studies in Belgium and the Netherlands have found that common mental disorders are more prevalent among Moroccan and Turkish immigrants [6, 7]. Other studies have shown that these groups have found their way to the mental health services [8, 9] but treatment intensity seems to be less favourable [10] and high rates of treatment drop-out were found: 46%, among immigrant patients in specialized mental health service use compared to 24% among Dutch patients [11, 12]. The high drop-out rates can lead to higher risks of chronicity of symptoms and prolonged disabilities.

The high drop-out rates among immigrants may be due to language problems, to different interpretations of symptoms and to different expectations of treatment [13]. Adequate treatment can only be given when a firm and steady working-relation can be established. It is thought that training therapists in cultural competences will bridge the gap between immigrant patients and their therapists. Without this competence health practitioners can easily fall prey to errors of diagnosis, inappropriate and poor treatment [14]. Training modules in intercultural competence courses have been developed for (mental) health workers. Therapists learn about the cultural background of specific immigrant groups. They learn to be aware of different notions of health and illness and they are trained in specific intercultural skills. Although widely applied there is, up to now, no evidence that training in cultural competence reduces drop-out of treatment or improves treatment outcome [15, 16].

The aim of this study is to test whether a cultural competence training for therapists can reduce the treatment drop-out in Moroccan and Turkish patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in specialized mental health care. In order to test the effectiveness of this course we designed a randomized controlled trial. Our research questions are:
  1. 1.

    Does the intercultural competences training of therapists reduce treatment drop-out rates of Moroccan and Turkish patients with depressive and anxiety disorders in specialized mental health care?

     
  2. 2.

    Does the intercultural competences training of therapists reduce no-show rates, enhance the patient-therapist working alliance and patients' trust in care?

     
  3. 3.

    What are determinants of treatment dropout?

     

Method/Design

Study design

This study is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial in which treatment drop-out rates of Moroccan and Turkish immigrants with depressive and anxiety disorders, who are treated by therapists trained in cultural competences, are compared to those who receive regular care. Figure 1 shows the design.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Recruitment and measurement protocol.

Recruitment/Setting and locations

Participants are recruited within two outpatient mood disorder clinics in Amsterdam. All new Moroccan and Turkish registries, mostly referred by their general practitioner, are screened on in- and exclusion criteria. If eligible, the new registries are randomized by a research assistant before the intake procedure starts. Then the patients are given an appointment for an intake interview by a therapist from the matching condition. After this intake interview the patients receive study information and the informed consent form from the therapists. Within two weeks after the intake an interviewer contacts a patient by telephone and asks oral consent to participate in the study. If the patient gives permission, an appointment is made for the basic interview in the clinic. If the patient is willing and eligible to participate, a written informed consent is signed.

Randomization

The patients are randomized by an independent randomization team that uses a computerized random number generator. The patients are randomly assigned for either intake or treatment to therapists who are trained in cultural competence (the intervention group) or to therapists who are not trained in cultural competence (regular care, control group). The research assistant reveals the treatment condition by telephone to the registration staff who plans the intake interview.

Participants

Inclusion criteria

Patients (ages 18 to 65) are eligible to participate if:
  1. 1.

    their main problem is a depressive and/or an anxiety disorder for which they are referred to the participating outpatient mood disorder clinics.

     
  2. 2.

    they are first or second generation Moroccan or Turkish immigrants. The definition for a first generation immigrant is that the patient him- or herself was born in Morocco or Turkey. The definition for the second generation migrant is that at least one of the patient's parents was born in Morocco or Turkey [17].

     

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded from the study if their main problem is one of the following disorders: a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, organic brain syndrome, substance dependence, or a severe borderline, schizotypical, or antisocial personality disorder.

Intervention versus control-group therapists

In both clinics six therapists are selected for the intervention group and six for the control group of this study. In both groups disciplines of the therapists, the average amount of years of general treatment experience and ethnic background are evenly distributed.

Intervention

Therapists of the intervention condition have been trained in cultural competence. The training program is based on existing modules that are widely used in the Netherlands and are based on international and national literature [1823]. The aim of the module is to train the intervention therapists' knowledge, awareness and skills in diagnosing and treating Moroccan and Turkish patients with depression and anxiety disorders.

To improve the cultural knowledge the therapists are familiarized with the Moroccan and Turkish patients' background and learn about:

  • the specific cultural aspect and elements,

  • the impact of migration in first and second generation immigrants,

  • the migration history,

  • the religious background, (health)habits, beliefs, explanations and expectations,

  • traditional health care and health workers.

To improve the cultural awareness therapists are taught to:

  • be aware of their own cultural background, attitudes and values,

  • recognise prejudices and generalizations regarding the cultural background of the patients.

To improve the intercultural skills the therapists are trained:

  • how to give psychoeducation

  • how to make use of an interpreter during treatment,

  • how to make use of the Cultural Formulation [24] during intake and treatment,

  • in intercultural diagnostics [25],

  • how to use the intercultural addenda to the treatment guidelines for depression and anxiety disorders [26, 27].

The module has an interactive character. It contains exercises in becoming aware of the therapists' own cultural background; a discussion about how to deal with traditional health workers; a role play with an actor in using an interpreter and in using the Cultural Formulation during treatment.

The training takes two days. After the training the intervention therapists join a monthly intercultural peer group to keep knowledge, awareness and skills vivid.

Assessments

Data are collected at three points in time: within two weeks after the intake (T0), four weeks after the start of the treatment (T1), 16 weeks after the start of the treatment (T2). Table 1 summarizes the measures that are used at each point. The assessments are partly performed face to face by a trained interviewer and partly self report. Most of the interviewers are bilingual. Besides sufficient command of the Dutch language the Turkish, Moroccan-Arabic and Berber languages are requested respectively. The interviewers participate in a three day training. The interview and self report questionnaires consist of pen and paper versions only.
Table 1

Summary of measures

Primary outcome measure

Measurement instrument

Method

Baseline

Follow-up 1

Follow-up 2

Dropout

Medical Record

Report- therapist

 

X

X

Secondary outcome measure

Measurement instrument

Method

Baseline

Follow-up 1

Follow-up 2

Course of treatment

     

Type of treatment

Medical Record

Report- therapist

 

X

X

Time in treatment

Medical Record

Report- therapist

 

X

X

No-show

Medical Record

Report- therapist

 

X

X

Patients' perspective of treatment

     

Therapeutic relationship

HAQ

Self Report- patient

X

X

X

Patient evaluation of trust in care

NIVEL

Self Report- patient

X

 

X

Determinants

Measurement instrument

Method

Baseline

Follow-up 1

Follow-up 2

Demographics

Standard questions

Interview- patient

   
   

X

  

Public Health consequences

     

Level of functioning

WHO-DAS II

Self Report- patient

X

X

X

Work productivity

TIC-P

Interview- patient

X

X

X

Need of care

PNCQ Meadows

Interview- patient

X

 

X

Anxiety and Depression

     

Diagnosis

CIDI

Interview- patient

X

  

Severity of depression

IDS

Self Report- patient

X

X

X

Severity of anxiety

BAI

Self Report- patient

X

X

X

Physical Conditions

     

Somatic disease

One- question

Interview- patient

X

X

X

Medication use

Medication use Questionnaire

Interview- patient

X

 

X

Pain

Chronic graded pain scale

Interview- patient

X

 

X

Social functioning

     

Acculturation

LAS

Interview- patient

X

  

Discrimination

Part of the National Survey of Midlife Development in US

Interview- patient

X

  

Social functioning

Close Person Inventory

Self Report- patient

X

 

X

Primary outcome measure

The primary outcome measure is drop-out of treatment. Treatment drop-out is defined as: the patient is in need of more therapy in the therapist's opinion but ignores at least two invitations of the therapist and does not continue the sessions. Data will be gathered by interviewing the therapists and analysing the medical records.

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary outcome measures focus on no-show and the patients' perspective of treatment. No-show rates will be collected from the medical records of the participants. The patients' perspective will be measured using the Helping Alliance Questionnaire [28] and the trust in mental health care questionnaire (a part of the NIVEL consumer panel questionnaire will be used [29]).

Dropout determinants

Several possible determinants of drop-out will be explored:

Demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, education); level of functioning (WHO-Disability Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) [30]); loss of productivity at work and health care utilization (Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness (TIC-P) [31]); perceived need for care (Perceived Need for Care questionnaire (PNCQ) [32]); the diagnosis of depression and anxiety disorders (Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) depression and anxiety life time version (WHO version 2.1) ([33, 34, 33, 35]); severity of depressive symptoms (Inventory of Depressive Symptoms self report version (IDS) [36]); severity of generalised anxiety and panic symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory self-report version (BAI)[37]); somatic disease (perceived somatic problems on an analogue scale from 1 to 10); medication use (Medication use questionnaire); pain (Chronic graded pain scale [38]); acculturation (the Lowlands Acculturation Scale (LAS) [39, 40]); social support (Close Person Inventory [41]); discrimination (a part of the national survey of Midlife development in the US); locus of control (Pearlin and Schooler mastery scale [42]).

Translation of the instruments

For this project insufficient command of the Dutch language is not an exclusion criterion. Therefore, we use translated questionnaires if necessary. For respondents who only understand the Turkish language, we use translated and validated Turkish instruments (IDS http://www.ids-qids.org, BAI [43], CIDI (WHO)) and translated instruments used in the Amsterdam Health Monitor (AHM) study [44] (Who-Das II, PNCQ, LAS, discrimination, locus of control, NIVEL trust in care). The other questionnaires were translated at our institute. Bilingual (Dutch and Turkish speaking and writing) mental health professionals translated the Dutch version into Turkish and this Turkish version was translated back into Dutch by other bilingual mental health professionals.

Because the Moroccan language is a collection of dialects no validated and translated versions of the instruments are available. For the respondents who only understand a Moroccan language we use several instruments used in the Amsterdam Health Monitor (AHM) (CIDI, LAS, discrimination, locus of control, PNCQ). These instruments were not completely translated into Moroccan Arabic. The Dutch version is used and only a keyword in each question was translated into Moroccan Arabic. For the other interview instruments (demographic, TIC-P, medication use, somatic disease, pain scale) keywords were translated in our institute by a focus group of bilingual students (Dutch-Moroccan-Arabic). For the self-report a complete translated version into Moroccan Arabic is accomplished. We asked the Dutch public translation centre (Tolk Vertaal centrum Nederland or TVcN) to translate the Dutch instruments into modern standard Moroccan Arabic. A focus group of bilingual students (Dutch-Moroccan-Arabic) translated it back into Dutch and adapted the Moroccan translation where necessary. We knew from the AHM study that most of the Moroccan respondents who did not speak Dutch well enough, speak a mix of Berber, Moroccan Arabic and Dutch. The interviewers are trained to cope with these language problems as much as possible. In all interviews the interviewers will specify in which language the interview has been conducted and how many problems they have encountered (language or verbal expression problems, associative behaviour or reluctancy to answer). Interviewers assess the reliability of the answers given.

Sample size

No comparable intervention studies, aiming to reduce drop-out rates in immigrants, have been found in literature. In an intervention study by Blom et al [11, 12], post hoc analyses showed that the drop-out rate was 46% in immigrant patients compared to 24% in native patients. Based on these data we assume that the drop-out can be reduced from 45% to 30%, an improvement of 33%. To demonstrate this difference 75 patients in each condition (beta 0.01 and alpha 0,05) should be included [45].

Analysis

Basic characteristics will be compared between treatment conditions. Dropout will be analysed by (non) parametric longitudinal analysis techniques (eg GLM model) using multivariate statistics. Determinants are modelled along. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Ethical principles

Participation in this study is voluntary. Participants are informed that they can cancel their participation at any time without disclosing reasons for their cancellation and without negative consequences for their future care. Participants sign a written informed consent.

Vote of the ethics committee

The design and conduct of the study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.

Discussion

This study protocol is presented here to offer researchers the opportunity to consider the methodological quality of this study with a critical view. Therapists can benefit by considering the information regarding the practical implications of the proposed protocol on immigrants with depressive and anxiety disorders in specialized mental health care.

The number of studies examining the effect of intercultural competence in mental health care is small [15, 16]. High drop-out rates among immigrant patients is a serious mental health problem that deserves proper research. As far as we know, this is the first study examining the effect of intercultural competences for therapists on drop-out rates. Our study can make a contribution to the improvement of care for Moroccan and Turkish patients with depression and anxiety disorders in specialized mental health care in the Netherlands. Additionally findings may be generalised to other immigrants groups and to other countries.

This study is innovative in the development of a training module for specialised mental health therapists focusing on a specific treatment group, Moroccan and Turkish patients with depression and anxiety symptoms. We will systematically verify if the implementation of existing knowledge and skills are effective in improving working relationships and treatment. At the end of the study, we expect to define a clear and transferable intervention module, which, if effective, can be implemented in specialised mental health care.

Positive aspect and limitations of the study

In this study we try to reach a study population, which is mostly excluded from clinical trials, as inadequate command of the dominant language is often an exclusion criterion. This is a positive aspect as well as a limitation of this study. Positive because findings can be generalised and are more representative for the whole group of immigrants; a limitation because most questionnaires are not validated.

Another positive aspect of this study is that due to the large overlap in instruments data from this project can be combined with those from the Amsterdam Health Monitor which contains mental health data from Amsterdam immigrants in first-line care [44]. In addition data from this study will be linked to those from the Dutch Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), a large longitudinal study on depression and anxiety [46]. The number of Moroccan and Turkish participants enrolled in this study was small (N = 29). Therefore the findings of the present study provide valuable additional information. The questionnaires we use in the present study are largely consistent with the NESDA applied instruments, and combined data make it possible to explore psychometric properties of the translated instruments.

Other limitations of the study are that therapists will become aware of the intervention, and contamination between intervention and control group therapists can not be completely avoided. For a maximum prevention of contamination control therapists receive minimal information about the intervention. Intervention therapists discuss patients participating in the study in a separate supervision team on cultural competence.

Description of risks

There are no specific risks related to this study.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study is financed by ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health and Development, grant number 100-004-007.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Department, GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(3)
Research Department, Arkin Mental Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(4)
Department of Psychiatry and Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

References

  1. Brocker A: Paving the way to a better future. Turkish in the Netherlands. Immigrant Integration. The Dutch Case. Edited by: Vermeulen H, Penninx R. 2000, Amsterdam: Spinhuis, 153-177.Google Scholar
  2. Nelissen C, Buijs FJ: Between continuity and change. Moroccans in the Netherlands. Immigrant Integration. The Dutch Case. Edited by: Vermeulen H, Penninx R. 2000, Amsterdam: Spinhuis, 178-201.Google Scholar
  3. Dutch Central Statistics Office. 2010, [http://www.cbs.nl]
  4. van Hint P, Vermeulen-Winsant J: Amsterdam in cijfers. Jaarboek 2000 [Amsterdam in Figures] O+S het Amsterdamse Bureau voor onderzoek en statistiek. Edited by: Zee van W, Boer de E, Hylkema C, Slot J. 2009, Amsterdam, O+SGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhugra D, Jones P: Migration and mental illness. Advanced in Psychiatric Treatment. 2001, 7: 216-222. 10.1192/apt.7.3.216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. de Wit MAS, Tuinebreijer WC, Dekker J, Beekman AJ, Gorissen WHM, Schrier AC, et al: Depressive and anxiety disorders in different ethnic groups: a population based study among native Dutch, and Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese migrants in Amsterdam. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008, 43: 905-912. 10.1007/s00127-008-0382-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levecque K, Lodewyckx I, Vranken J: Depression and generalised anxiety in the general population in Belgium: a comparison between native and immigrant groups. J Affect Disord. 2007, 97: 229-239. 10.1016/j.jad.2006.06.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fassaert T, de Wit MAS, Tuinebreijer WC, Verhoeff AP, Beekman ATF, Dekker J: Perceived need for mental health care among non-western labour migrants. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009, 44: 208-216. 10.1007/s00127-008-0418-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schrier A, Theunissen JR, Kempe PT, et al: Migranten in de ambulante ggz maken een inhaalslag. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie. 2010, 47: 771-777.Google Scholar
  10. Fassaert T, Peen J, van Straten A, de Wit M, Schrier A, Heijnen H, et al: Ethnic differences and similarities in outpatient treatment for depression in the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv. 2010, 61: 690-697. 10.1176/appi.ps.61.7.690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blom MMBJ: Combination treatment for depressed outpatients. efficacy and prediction of outcome. PhD theis. 2007, VU universityGoogle Scholar
  12. Struijs AJ, Wennink HJ: Allochtone clienten en geestelijke gezondheidszorg. Achtergrondstudie. 2000, Zoetermeer, Trimbos-Instituut en Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en ZorgGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilderink I, Van't Land H, Smits C: Drop-out onder allochtone GGZ-clienten. Zicht op onderliggende factoren en aanbevelingen om drop-out te verminderen. 2009, Utrecht, Trimbos-instituutGoogle Scholar
  14. Dein S: ABC of mental health. Mental health in a multiethnic society. BMJ. 1997, 315: 473-476.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhui K, Warfa N, Edonya P, McKenzie K, Bhugra D: Cultural competence in mental health care: a review of model evaluations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007, 7: 15-10.1186/1472-6963-7-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Derek Griner, Smith Timothy B: Culturally adapted mental health interventions: a meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2006, 43: 531-548. 10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutch Central Statistics Office: Standaard definitie allochtonen. INDEX 10. 2000Google Scholar
  18. Hinton DE, Pham T, Tran M, Safren SA, Otto MW, Pollack MH: CBT for Vietnamese refugees with treatment-resistant PTSD and panic attacks: a pilot study. J Trauma Stress. 2004, 17: 429-433. 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048956.03529.fa.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleinman A: illness narratives. Suffering, healing, and the human condition. 1988, New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinman A: Culture and psychiatric diagnosis and treatment: What are the necessary skills?. 2005, Utrecht: Trimbos-instituutGoogle Scholar
  21. Kortman F: Transculturele psychiatrie. Van praktijk naar theorie. 2006, Assen: Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
  22. Kramer S: Nieuwsgierig blijven. Implementatie van de interculturele competenties in de GGZ. 2007, MikadoGoogle Scholar
  23. Schraufnagel TJ, Wagner AW, Miranda J, Roy-Byrne PP: Treating minority patients with depression and anxiety: what does the evidence tell us?. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006, 28: 27-36. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis-Fernandez R: Cultural formulation of psychiatric diagnosis. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1996, 20: 133-144. 10.1007/BF00115858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Borra R, Van Dyck R, Rohlof H: Cultuur, classificatie en diagnose. 2002, Houten: Bohn, Stafleu van LoghumView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. de Jong JTVM: Intercultureel addendum angststoornissen. 2008, Rotterdam, MikadoGoogle Scholar
  27. Noordenbos G: Aandacht voor sekse-en cultuurspecifieke aspecten in de behandeling van depressie. Een aanvulling op de Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Depressie. 2007, Utrecht, TransactGoogle Scholar
  28. Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, Johnson SBA, Najavits LM, Frank A, et al: The revised helping alliance questionnare (HAQ-II). Psychometric properties. The Journal of Psychometric Practice and Research. 1996, 5: 260-271.Google Scholar
  29. Friele RD, Verhaak PFM, Andela M: Vertrouwen in de GGZ: meer duidelijkheid gevraagd. MGV. 2000, 55: 122-133.Google Scholar
  30. Chwastiak LA, Von Korff M: Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 507-514. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00051-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hakkaart-Van Roijen L: Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness (TIC-P). 2002, Rotterdam, Institute for Medical Technology AssessmentGoogle Scholar
  32. Meadows G, Harvey C, Fossey E, Burgess P: Assessing perceived need for mental helath care in a community survey: development of the Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ). Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000, 35: 427-435. 10.1007/s001270050260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittchen HU, Robins LN, Cottler LB, Sartorius N, Burke JD, Regier D: Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Multicentre WHO/ADAMHA Field Trials. Br J Psychiatry. 1991, 159: 645-53. 10.1192/bjp.159.5.645. 658View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wacker HR, Battergay R, Mullejans R, Schlosser C: Using the CIDI-C in the general population. Psychiatry: a world perspective. Edited by: Stefanis CN, Rabavilas AD, Soldatos CR. 2006, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 138-143.Google Scholar
  35. Wittchen HU: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO--Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1994, 28: 57-84. 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR, Jarrett RB, Trivedi MH: The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996, 26: 477-486. 10.1017/S0033291700035558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA: An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988, 56: 893-897. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Von Korff M, Moore JC: Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 134: 911-917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamperman AM, Komproe IH, de Jong JTVM: Verklaringen voor verschillen in de Psychiatrische stoornissen in een onderzoek onder migranten. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie. 2007, 15: 315-326.Google Scholar
  40. Mooren TTM, Knipscheer JW, Kamperman AM, Kleber RJ, Komproe IH: The Lowlands Acculturation Scale. Validity of an Adaptation Measure Among Migrants in the Netherlands. The impact of war. Studies on the psychological consequences of war and migration. 2001, Delft: Eburon Publishers, 49-70.Google Scholar
  41. Stansfeld S, Marmot M: Deriving a survey measure of social support: the reliability and validity of the Close Persons Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 1992, 35: 1027-1035. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90242-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearlin LI, Schooler C: The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav. 1978, 19: 2-21. 10.2307/2136319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ulusoy Mustafa, Sahin Nesrin H, Erkmen Husnu: Turkish Version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric Properties., 1998. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 1998, 12: 163-172.Google Scholar
  44. de Wit MAS, Tuinebreijer WC, Beekman ATF, et al: Stemmings-en angststoornissen in Amsterdam: verschillen in voorkomen en zorggebruik naar etniciteit GGD Amsterdam. 2006, Amsterdam, GGD Amsterdam, cluster EDGGoogle Scholar
  45. Bausel RB, Li YI: Power Analysis For Experimental Research. 2002, Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. NESDA: Nederlandse studie naar depressie en angst. [http://www.nesda.nl]
  47. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/13/prepub

Copyright

© van Loon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement