Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Psychiatry

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The influence of psychiatric screening in healthy populations selection: a new study and meta-analysis of functional 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 polymorphisms and anxiety-related personality traits

  • Alessandra Minelli1,
  • Cristian Bonvicini1,
  • Catia Scassellati1,
  • Riccardo Sartori2 and
  • Massimo Gennarelli1, 3Email author
BMC Psychiatry201111:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-50

Received: 4 August 2010

Accepted: 31 March 2011

Published: 31 March 2011

Abstract

Background

A genetic liability for anxiety-related personality traits in healthy subjects has been associated with the functional serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR), although the data are somewhat conflicting. Moreover, only one study has investigated the functional significance of the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 haplotypes in relation to anxiety traits in healthy subjects. We tested whether the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 haplotypes are linked to Harm Avoidance (HA) using an association study (STUDY I) and a meta-analytic approach (STUDY II).

Methods

STUDY I: A total of 287 unrelated Italian volunteers were screened for DSM-IV Axis I disorders and genotyped for the 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 (A/G) polymorphisms. Different functional haplotype combinations were also analyzed. STUDY II: A total of 44 studies were chosen for a meta-analysis of the putative association between 5-HTTLPR and anxiety-related personality traits.

Results

STUDY I: In the whole sample of 287 volunteers, we found that the SS genotype and S'S' haplotypes were associated with higher scores on HA. However, because the screening assessed by Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) showed the presence of 55 volunteers affected by depression or anxiety disorders, we analyzed the two groups ("disordered" and "healthy") separately. The data obtained did indeed confirm that in the "healthy" group, the significant effects of the SS genotype and S'S' haplotypes were lost, but they remained in the "disordered" group. STUDY II: The results of the 5-HTTLPR meta-analysis with anxiety-related traits in the whole sample confirmed the association of the SS genotype with higher anxiety-related traits scores in Caucasoids; however, when we analyzed only those studies that used structured psychiatric screening, no association was found.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the relevance to perform analyses on personality traits only in DSM-IV axis I disorder-free subjects. Furthermore, we did not find an association between functional serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms and anxiety traits in healthy subjects screened through a structured psychiatric interview.

Keywords

NeuroticismHarm Avoidance5-HTTLPRrs25531meta-analysis

Background

Personality traits can be defined as individual qualities or characteristics that influence cognitions, emotions, and behaviors and lead to adaptive or maladaptive responses. Human personality is a multidimensional structure that is affected by both environmental and genetic factors. According to the literature, individual variation of the heritable component is estimated to account for 30-40% of the variance in personality traits [1]. To date, the most frequently studied candidate gene for personality traits has been the functional polymorphism 5-HTTLPR in the promoter region of the SLC6A4 gene, which encodes the serotonin transporter. This polymorphism results in a short (S) and a long (L) variant [2, 3].

Functional studies of the activity of the SLC6A4 promoter in transfected cell lines, postmortem human brains, and lymphoblasts have confirmed that the L allele is associated with higher levels of transcriptional activity and influences the rate of serotonin uptake more than the S variant [4]. According to recent findings, the S allele is associated with a less favorable response/resistance to pharmacological treatment [58] but also with central stress regulation [911].

Recently it has been critically discussed that the analysis of 5-HTTLPR is incomplete, because other polymorphisms have been found in the proximity of the Ins/Del locus, such as rs25531, rs25532, rs2020933, and a 17-bp variable tandem repeat in the second intron (STin2) [4, 12, 13]. In particular, rs25531, the polymorphism nearest 5-HTTLPR, results in an A to G substitution and has been shown to modulate the effect of 5-HTTLPR on transcriptional efficacy. Our recent work [8] reported evidence that the rs25531 polymorphism is located immediately outside of the 5-HTTLPR segment, resulting in the status of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 as two independent polymorphisms. It has been reported that the G allele of rs25531 is in phase with the 5-HTTLPR long allele and mitigates transcriptional efficacy more than does the 5-HTTLPR short allele. Therefore, the modulation of 5-HTTLPR by rs25531 results in haplotypes with a high (LA) or low (LG, SA or SG) transcriptional efficacy [4, 14].

The inventories mostly used in biological studies of personality are the NEO-Personality Inventory [15] and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) [16]. Although NEO and TCI have relevant differences, they appear similar when evaluating anxiety traits such as Neuroticism (N) and Harm Avoidance (HA). Several studies have shown that N is highly related to HA [17, 18], but there is evidence that N and HA may not be equivalent [19].

Since the first paper of Lesch [3] was published, a large number of studies have sought evidence of an association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and anxiety-related personality traits. Despite these investigations, the strength and nature of any association is still uncertain. Controvertible results were obtained using both the TCI and NEO scales. In addition, five meta-analyses [2024] provided conflicting results. In 2003, Munafò [20] reported an association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and avoidance traits, but this effect was no longer being significant when data from studies reporting allele frequencies not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and unpublished data were excluded. Two successive meta-analyses [23, 24] found an association between N and 5-HTTLPR, although no link with HA was observed. However, opposing data were reported in a different meta-analysis in 2005 [21]. Munafò et al. [21] concluded that the effect, if present, is small. More recently, the same authors [22] presented a more complete meta-analysis, which evidenced no association of 5-HTTLPR with HA and a significant association with N; however, the association was lost due to high between-study heterogeneity in analyses conducted using the random effects model.

It is important to emphasize that these contrasting results may be explained by the inclusion of studies that recruited participants from psychiatric populations. Both Schinka and Sen's meta-analyses [23, 24] included data from healthy and patients whereas the different Munafò's meta-analyses [2022] explicitly excluded studies that recruited from psychiatric populations and, when both psychiatric and control samples were recruited, data from healthy controls only were included. Indeed, the personality traits of pathological people could be confounding factors. It has long been known that depression and anxiety disorders are associated with higher scores for anxiety-related traits [2528]. In addition, a higher frequency of the S allele was observed in depressed and anxious disorders patients [29]. Another relevant bias could be the inclusion of data from presumably healthy subjects without any psychological screening to exclude any DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorders.

On the basis of these conflicting evidences we performed the following analyses: 1) STUDY I: an association study between the 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 and the relative estimated/phased haplotypes with anxiety personality traits measured using the self-rated TCI scale. The analyses were carried out in the whole sample of controls as well as in subjects without any DSM-IV axis I disorders screened by structured interviews; 2) STUDY II: meta-analyses of 5-HTTLPR and HA or N in controls and in screened samples.

STUDY 1: A new association study of 5-HTTLPR and 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 with HA

Methods

Participants

A total of 287 unrelated volunteers (age: 50.05 ± 15.94 years [mean ± SD]; range: 22 to 87 years; 117 males and 170 females) were recruited through a variety of sources, such as universities, newspaper advertisements, and elderly associations. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fatebenefratelli Hospital (San Giovanni di Dio, Brescia, Italy), and written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. The subjects were screened for DSM-IV Axis I disorders through the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) [30] and screened for any history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence by expert psychologists. Personality traits were assessed by the Italian version of TCI, a 240-item true-false self-report questionnaire [31]. Subjects who scored less than 27/30 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (M.M.S.E.) [32] were excluded from the study to avoid biases in the completion of the TCI.

Genotyping analyses of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531

Isolation of DNA, genotyping of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531, as well as the classification of estimated phased haplotypes (SASA, SGSG, LGSA, and LGLG as S'S'; LA SA and LALG as L'S'; and LALA as L'L') were described in a study by Bonvicini [8]. We did not detect the LGLG or SGSG haplotypes in the genotyping analyses.

Statistical analysis

The association between TCI scores and 5-HTTLPR or 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 was analyzed by analysis of variance, using the HA score as the dependent variable, genotypes and sex as independent variables, and age as a covariate (ANCOVA). The p-values have been corrected for multiple comparisons. All analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

The association study showed a power > 80% by using the Quanto program version 1.2.4 with the following parameters: 5-HTTLPR S and S'S' minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of 15% and 21%, respectively, in a population of European origin; p ≤ 0.05; OR ≥ 1.6; log additive mode of inheritance; and population risk ≥ 10%.

Results

In the whole sample of 287 volunteers, the minor S allele frequency of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism was 0.39; the genotype frequencies and HA (mean score +/- SD) of LL, LS, and SS were 0.37 (43.42 +/- 17.14), 0.48 (42.55 +/- 17.96) and 0.15 (48.57 +/- 20.18), respectively (Table 1). The genotype distributions were in HWE (χ2 = 0.05; p = 0.82). The results indicated a trend toward an association between 5-HTTLPR and anxiety-related scale for genotypes (p = 0.06), and a significant effect was found when we considered the L allele as dominant (p = 0.02). Concerning the analysis of the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 the ANCOVA results showed an effect using a dominant L model (L'L' + L'S' vs. S'S' p = 0.05, Table 1).
Table 1

HA scores (Mean ± Standard Deviation) of all participants, including screened healthy subjects and people excluded for depression and anxiety disorders, stratified according to the 5-HTTLPR and the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 estimated/phased haplotypes

 

All subjects (287)

Healthy subjects (229)

Disordered subjects b(55)

Genotype 5-HTTLPR

N (freq. %)

HA (mean ± SD)

p (ANCOVA) a

N (freq. %)

HA (mean ± SD)

p (ANCOVA) a

N (freq. %)

HA (mean ± SD)

p (ANCOVA) a

LL

107 (0.37)

43.42 ± 17.14

F = 2.84

93 (0.41)

41.63 ± 15.66

F = 0.34

13 (0.24)

57.14 ± 21.73

F = 1.85

LS

138 (0.48)

42.55 ± 17.96

p = 0.06

109 (0.48)

39.08 ± 16.72

p = 0.71

27 (0.49)

56.19 ± 16.88

p = 0.17

SS

42 (0.15)

48.57 ± 20.18

 

27 (0.11)

37.25 ± 12.11

 

15 (0.27)

68.95 ± 15.11

 

Carriers

         

Carriers L

245 (0.85)

42.93 ± 17.57

F = 5.73

202 (0.89)

40.25 ± 16.25

F = 0.18

40 (0.73)

56.50 ± 18.32

F = 3.86

vs SS

  

p = 0.02

  

p = 0.67

  

p = 0.05

Carriers S

180 (0.63)

43.95 ± 18.62

F = 0.37

136 (0.59)

38.72 ± 15.89

F = 0.70

42 (0.76)

60.75 ± 17.24

F = 0.60

vs LL

  

p = 0.54

  

p = 0.40

  

p = 0.44

Phased Haplotype frequencies

LALA

93 (0.32)

42.27 ± 16.60

F = 2.00

82 (0.36)

40.70 ± 14.97

F = 0.59

10 (0.18)

56.29 ± 23.41

F = 1.14

LALG

14 (0.05)

51.02 ± 19.28

p = 0.09

11 (0.05)

48.57 ± 19.55

p = 0.67

3 (0.05)

60.00 ± 18.73

p = 0.35

LASA

120 (0.42)

42.41 ± 17.58

 

94 (0.41)

38.85 ± 16.14

 

25 (0.46)

55.20 ± 17.16

 

LGSA

18 (0.06)

43.49 ± 20.82

 

15 (0.07)

40.57 ± 20.58

 

2 (0.04)

68.57 ± 4.04

 

SASA

42 (0.15)

48.57 ± 20.18

 

27 (0.11)

37.25 ± 12.11

 

15 (0.27)

68.95 ± 15.11

 

Clustered Phased Haplotype frequencies

L'L'

93 (0.32)

42.27 ± 16.60

F = 2.12

82 (0.36)

40.70 ± 14.97

F = 0.04

10 (0.18)

56.29 ± 23.41

F = 2.50

L'S'

134 (0.47)

43.30 ± 17.88

p = 0.12

105 (0.46)

39.86 ± 16.69

p = 0.96

28 (0.51)

55.71 ± 17.03

p = 0.09

S'S'

60 (0.21)

47.05 ± 20.34

 

42 (0.18)

38.43 ± 15.50

 

17 (0.31)

68.91 ± 14.17

 

Carriers of Phased haplotypes

(L'L' + L'S')

227 (0.79)

47.05 ± 20.34

F = 3.92

187 (0.82)

38.43 ± 15.50

F = 0.08

38 (0.69)

68.91 ± 14.17

F = 5.15

vs (S'S')

  

p = 0.05

  

p = 0.77

  

p = 0.03

(L'S' + S'S')

194 (0.68)

44.46 ± 18.70

F = 1.47

147 (0.64)

39.45 ± 16.32

F = 0.04

45 (0.82)

60.70 ± 17.11

F = 0.81

vs L'L'

  

p = 0.23

  

p = 0.85

  

p = 0.37

The ANCOVA results for the genotypes, clustered genotype, and carriers are included.

a HA score as the dependent variable, genotype or clustered genotype and sex as independent variables, and age as a covariate.

b Disordered group consisted of subjects with depression and anxiety disorders.

Based on the assessment performed using M.I.N.I., the sample consisted of 229 (80%) subjects without lifetime DSM-IV Axis I disorders (the "healthy" group) and 58 subjects (20%) with these disorders (the "disordered" group). In the "disordered" group, 38 subjects had MDD, 2 had Panic Disorder, 22 had Generalized Anxiety Disorder, 6 had Dysthymia, 1 had Bipolar Disorder, 1 experienced alcohol abuse and 1 experienced substance abuse (the total number exceeds the number of subjects due to the presence of comorbidity). Because the literature has largely shown that people affected by unipolar major depression and anxiety disorders present homogeneous patterns of personality traits compared to other subjects [2528, 3336], the 55 participants with depression and/or anxiety lifetime diagnosis were regrouped. The three subjects affected by Bipolar Disorder, experienced alcohol and substance abuse were consequently excluded.

Thus, to evaluate whether the results from the participants excluded by M.I.N.I. had influenced the previous analyses, we performed ANCOVA using the HA score as the dependent variable, groups ("healthy" N = 229, "disordered" N = 55), genotypes, and sex as independent variables, and age as a covariate for both 5-HTTLPR and estimated/phased haplotypes. The results indicated that, the disordered group showed significantly higher HA scores than healthy subjects (F = 46.72, p < 0.0001). No association was found between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and anxiety traits (F = 1.34, p = 0.26), whereas a significant interaction was observed between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and groups (F = 4.52, p = 0.03). The same pattern was obtained when the SS genotype was compared to allele L carriers (F = 4.41, p = 0.04). Concerning the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531, a significant interaction was detected with the dominant L model (L'L' + L'S' vs. S'S'; p = 0.02). In all analyses, no significant gender effect or interaction was obtained.

In the sample of subjects with no DSM-IV axis I disorders (healthy group), we performed an ANCOVA analysis to test the possible association between polymorphisms and HA. There was no significant association between HA and either the 5-HTTLPR or the 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 haplotypes (Table 1). Despite its small size, the disordered group revealed an association between HA and SS or S'S' homozygosity (p = 0.05 and p = 0.03, respectively).

STUDY 2: Meta-analyses of 5-HTTLPR with anxiety traits

Methods

Literature search

To identify eligible studies for the meta-analysis, we performed a search through PubMed (at the National Library of Medicine) for all the available studies of the association between the serotonin transporter and anxiety personality traits conducted in healthy adults, using the following search terms: serotonin transporter polymorphism, serotonin transporter gene, 5-HTTLPR, Neuroticism, Harm Avoidance, anxiety, and personality. Once articles had been collected, bibliographies were manually searched for additional eligible studies.

Inclusion criteria

All association studies that have measured anxiety traits using any version of NEO (NEO-PI, NEO-PI-R, or NEO-FFI) or the TCI (or TPQ) in male and/or female participants of any ethnic origin were included. Only data from controls were included from studies in which psychiatric patients and control data were compared. Data that appeared in more than one published study were included only once in the analyses. Papers not written in English [37] were excluded.

Data extraction

We recorded the number of participants, the mean of N and/or HA trait scores, and the standard deviation for each of the three genotype groups (LL, LS, SS) in each study included in our analysis. Furthermore, we extracted data regarding the male/female ratio, the mean age, the ethnic compositions of the sample, and the structured clinical interview used for screening. Genotype frequencies were used to calculate the HWE (program http://www.genemapping.cn). In cases where all or part of this information was not available in the publication, the authors were contacted by email.

Statistical analyses

The Review Manager was used to analyze data (RevMan Version 5.0.16; Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008).

Firstly, data were analyzed with the fixed effects model in order to combine individual study effect sizes (Cohen's ds) using inverse variance methods to generate a summary d and 95% confidence interval (CI). We analyzed a possible association by both comparing LL genotype versus carriers of the S allele and SS genotype versus carriers of the L allele. The significance of the pooled effect sizes was determined by the Z-test and the between-study heterogeneity was assessed using a χ2 test of goodness of fit and I2 statistic [38]. The significant p value was set at 0.05. In a fixed effects model, the fundamental assumption is that a single true effect size underlies all study results and that observed estimates vary only as a function of chance. The error term in a fixed effects model represents only within-study variation, and between-study variation is ignored. Where the results showed a significant effect in the presence of significant between-study heterogeneity, a random effects model was utilized, with ds pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird methods [39]. In contrast, a random effects model assumes that each study estimates different, yet related, true effects and that the distribution of the various effects is normally distributed around a mean effect size value. This model takes both within- and between-study variation into account. When there is little heterogeneity, both models yield essentially identical results. When heterogeneity is extensive, however, the analyses will yield different estimates of the mean effect size, and the confidence intervals around the estimates will be different sizes. When there is heterogeneity across studies, the random effects model yields wider confidence intervals than the fixed effects model and is thus usually more conservative.

Results

A total of 50 studies [3, 22, 4088] met our inclusion criteria; their features are shown in Table 2. Six studies were excluded from our analyses for significant deviation from HWE (p ≤ 0.05) [46, 52, 60, 65, 74, 81], and one was excluded for excessive ethnic heterogeneity [56]. Furthermore, nine other studies [50, 62, 63, 67, 68, 71, 76, 78, 86] were not included because the data regarding anxiety traits for each genotype and/or the data to test HWE were insufficient, and we were unable to obtain this kind of information from the authors.
Table 2

Characteristics of association studies eligible for inclusion

Study

Year

Inventorya

N

% Male

Mean Age

Ethnicity

HW equilibrium

HW χ2

HW p

Exclusion

Lesch

1996

NEO

505

92

37.6

94% Caucasian

YES

0.01

0.93

 

Ebstein

1997

TCI

121

55

29.7

74% Caucasian

YES

1.14

0.29

 

Nakamura

1997

Both

186

0

19.6

Asian

YES

1.15

0.28

 

Mazzanti

1998

TCI

215

85

35.5

Caucasian

YES

0.01

0.98

 

Ricketts

1998

TCI

37

nd

nd

Caucasian

YES

2.10

0.15

 

Flory

1999

NEO

225

50

45.7

84% Caucasian

YES

0.16

0.69

 

Hamer

1999

TCI

634

43

31.3

79% Caucasian

NO

3.85

0.04

Excludedb

Katsuragi

1999

TCI

101

61

25.0

Asian

YES

0.02

0.88

 

Kumakiri

1999

Both

144

42

24.4

Asian

YES

1.28

0.26

 

Benjamin

2000

TCI

455

40

nd

Caucasian

N/A

  

Excludedd

Comings

2000

TCI

81

100

32.9

Caucasian

YES

0.10

0.75

 

Du

2000

NEO

186

41

36.3

Caucasian

YES

0.77

0.38

 

Greenberg

2000

NEO

397

16

28.6

Caucasian

NO

4.75

0.03

Excludedb

Herbst

2000

TCI

425

51

43.8

67% Caucasian

YES

0.79

0.38

 

Hu

2000

NEO

759

62

29.2

81% Caucasian

YES

1.57

0.21

 

Osher

2000

Both

148

34

30.7

Caucasian

YES

0.11

0.75

 

Schmidt

2000

NEO

72

48

27.0

54% Caucasian

YES

0.06

0.80

Excludedc

Samochowiec

2001

TCI

126

30

23.8

Caucasian

YES

1.26

0.26

 

Cohen

2002

TCI

559

0

nd

Caucasian

NO

9.51

0.01

Excludedb

Tsai

2002

TCI

192

49

29.3

Asian

YES

2.30

0.13

 

Brummett

2003

NEO

99

32

70.3

87% Caucasian

YES

0.70

0.40

 

Umekage

2003

NEO

244

8

37.7

Asian

YES

2.08

0.15

 

Ham

2004

TCI

146

32

31.9

Asian

YES

0.01

0.98

 

Jacob

2004

Both

281

25

22.4

Caucasian

YES

0.59

0.44

 

Lang

2004

NEO

228

50

38.6

Caucasian

YES

1.14

0.29

 

Park

2004

TCI

100

0

48.3

Asian

YES

2.41

0.12

Excludedd

Samochowiec

2004

Both

100

47

41.0

Caucasian

YES

0.04

0.85

 

Szekely

2004

TCI

151

43

22.2

Caucasian

YES

0.59

0.44

 

Thierry

2004

TCI

76

0

32.8

Caucasian

YES

0.01

0.96

Excludedd

Sen

2004

NEO

415

33

43.8

Caucasian

NO

3.76

0.05

Excludedb

Bachner-Melman

2005

TCI

872

nd

21.4

N/A

N/A

  

Excludedc,d

Hariri

2005

TCI

92

49

30.5

Caucasian

N/A

  

Excludedd

Kim

2005

TCI

211

51

26.5

Asian

YES

0.06

0.81

Excludedd

Kremer

2005

TCI

730

nd

nd

N/A

N/A

  

Excludedc,d

Dragan

2006

NEO

196

0

21.7

Caucasian

YES

2.07

0.15

 

Lazagorta

2006

TCI

57

nd

45

Other

YES

3.70

0.05

Excludedb,c

Monteleone

2006

TCI

94

0

nd

Caucasian

YES

2.37

0.12

 

Serretti

2006

TCI

132

nd

nd

Caucasian

YES

0.02

0.90

 

Vorfelde

2006

Both

195

50

nd

Caucasian

YES

0.48

0.49

 

Hunnerkopf

2007

NEO

272

25

21.9

Caucasian

N/A

  

Excludedd

Joo

2007

TCI

158

44

23.8

Asian

YES

0.13

0.72

 

Nilsson

2007

TCI

196

60

17

Caucasian

YES

1.07

0.30

 

Schmitz

2007

Both

410

36

24

Caucasian

YES

0.07

0.78

 

Stein

2008

NEO

247

31

18.8

61% Caucasian

NO

3.88

0.05

Excludedb

Lee

2008

TCI

75

100

16.1

Asian

YES

2.97

0.08

Excludedd

Kazantseva

2008

TCI

301

20

19.8

Caucasian

YES

1.24

0.26

 

Suzuki

2008

TCI

575

51

28.7

Asian

YES

0.14

0.71

 

Munafò

2009

TCI

3872

44

42

Caucasian

YES

0.26

0.61

 

Gonda

2009

TCI

169

0

nd

Caucasian

YES

0.20

0.65

 

Terraccianoe

2009

NEO

3972

43

42.5

Caucasian

YES

1.33

0.25

 

Terraccianof

2009

NEO

1182

52

57.3

71% Caucasian

YES

0.87

0.35

 

Saiz

2010

TCI

404

50

40.5

Caucasian

YES

0.76

0.38

 

Present Study

 

TCI

229

45

49.2

Caucasian

YES

0.33

0.56

 

HW = Hardy-Weinberg; HW χ2 = Hardy-Weinberg chi square; HW p = Hardy-Weinberg p value; nd = not determined; N/A = not applicable.

a The term NEO referred to all versions (i.e. NEO-PI, NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI); the term TCI referred to all versions (TPQ).

b Excluded because genotype frequencies showed deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

c Excluded due to the ethnic heterogeneity or lack of data about ethnic origin.

d Excluded because of unavailable data.

e Data referred to SardiNIA sample.

f Data referred to BLSA (Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging) sample.

Therefore, the meta-analysis used the results of 35 studies, including 7 [41, 49, 55, 59, 69, 84, 85] that reported data for both inventories, 1 [83] that generated data on NEO on 2 different independent samples, and the data of present work; in total, 44 samples were available for analysis.

Because of ethnic differences in the 5-HTTLPR genotype distribution, the studies on Asian and Caucasoid populations were independently analyzed. When we conducted a comparison analysis between the LL genotype and S allele carriers in the Caucasoid population (Figure 1), no association was observed between 5-HTTLPR and HA (p = 0.94), and no evidence of between-study heterogeneity was apparent. A significant association with N (p < 0.01), indicating a higher anxiety trait score, and evidence of highly significant between-study heterogeneity (p < 0.0001, I2 = 74%) were found in the S allele carriers group. When the analysis was run again using the random effects method, the significant effect just described was no longer significant. No evidence for an association between the 5-HTTLPR genotype and N (p = 0.09) as well as no overall effect (p = 0.11) was shown.
Figure 1

Meta-analysis of 5-HTTLPR LL versus carriers S allele. Meta-analysis of association studies of serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits measured by NEO and TCI in Caucasoid population. It was used fixed effects model testing the comparison between LL genotype versus carriers S allele. Bars represent individual study 95% CI, with a central block proportional to study effect size, while summary diamond bar represents the pooled effect size estimate and 95% CI.

When we tested the L allele carriers versus the SS genotype in the same ethnic population (Figure 2), no association was found between 5-HTTLPR and HA or N, and there was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity. Instead, a significant overall effect was obtained (p = 0.03), and the two subgroups did not show significant differences (χ2 [1] = 0.01, p = 0.95, I2 = 0%).
Figure 2

Meta-analysis of 5-HTTLPR SS versus carriers L allele. Meta-analysis of association studies of serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits measured by NEO and TCI in Caucasoid population. It was used fixed effects model testing the comparison between carriers L allele versus SS genotype. Bars represent individual study 95% CI, with a central block proportional to study effect size, while summary diamond bar represents the pooled effect size estimate and 95% CI.

In the Asian population, no association was observed between the LL genotype and carriers of the S allele, using either TCI (d = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.24, 0.22, Z = 0.10, p = 0.92) or NEO (d = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.54, 0.24, Z = 0.75, p = 0.46). After clustering of the L allele carriers versus the SS genotype, there was no significant evidence of an association between 5-HTTLPR and either HA or N (d = -0.06, 95% CI = -0.16, 0.04, Z = 1.13, p = 0.26; and d = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.29, 0.05, Z = 1.38, p = 0.17; respectively). We did not find between-study heterogeneity in any groups.

Because of the bias inherent in a mix of healthy subjects with depressed or anxious people, we carried out a meta-analysis including only the studies with structured psychiatric interview screening [42, 43, 59, 66, 73, 75, 88]. No significant result was found when we considered an L dominant model (TCI: d = 0.00, 95% CI -0.12, 0.12, Z = 0.01, p = 1.00; NEO: d = -0.02, 95% CI -0.22, 0.18, Z = 0.19, p = 0.85; Overall effect p = 0.92) or a recessive model (TCI: d = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.25, 0.04, Z = 1.40, p = 0.16; NEO: d = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.39, 0.14, Z = 0.93, p = 0.35; Overall effect p = 0.09).

Discussion

The present study demonstrates the relevance of employing more stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria in association studies on healthy subjects. Our results show the influence of mistakes in the selection of subjects, underscoring the importance of the use of a structured psychiatric interview when people are enrolled as control subjects for this type of study. When we performed analyses on the whole sample of 287 volunteers, effects on the susceptibility to HA were found for both the SS genotype and the S'S' haplotypes. However, because the screening performed by M.I.N.I. revealed the presence of depression or anxiety disorders in 55 volunteers (the "disordered" group), we verified the possible influence of the variable "groups" ("healthy" and "disordered") on the genotypes. The results evidenced a significant interaction between genotypes and groups (5-HTTLPR; p = 0.03 and 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 L'L' + L'S' vs. S'S'; p = 0.02); thus, we conducted the analyses separately for these groups. The data confirmed that in the "healthy" group, the effects of the SS genotype and the S'S' haplotypes were lost, but they remained in the "disordered" group. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis involving approximately 18,000 controls of Caucasoid and Asian descent and considering anxiety traits measured by TPQ/TCI or NEO. Similarly, an association was observed between S allele in homozygosity and higher scores for anxiety-related traits, but when we analyzed only the studies that used structured psychiatric screening, no association was found.

Moreover, another important finding from both STUDY I and STUDY II is the absence of a role of the serotonin transporter gene in anxiety personality traits in healthy subjects.

To date, five meta-analyses have been conducted on the involvement of the functional 5-HTTLPR polymorphism with anxiety personality traits [2024]. Schinka's and Sen's meta-analyses [23, 24] found a strong association of 5-HTTLPR with N and no link to HA, whereas Munafò [2022] reported contrasting data; in particular no strong effect was detected [20, 22] and, when present, it was small [21]. As discussed in the 2005 study by Munafò [21], the association found in Schinka and Sen's meta-analyses [23, 24] may have been biased by the inclusion of studies that recruited participants from psychiatric populations. However, there is another bias that the Munafò meta-analyses [2022] did not take in consideration: the presence of studies in which structured psychiatric screening was not performed, producing a lack of information about the patients' lifetime history of psychiatric disorders. On this basis, we tried to verify whether the absence of a psychiatric screening interview might represent an important confounding variable in studies regarding the biological basis of personality traits in healthy populations. Indeed, STUDY I indicated an association between the SS genotype and S'S' haplotypes in 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 and anxiety traits in the whole sample of volunteers, but these effects were probably found due to the presence of subjects with depression and anxiety disorders. In fact, as reported in Table 1, these subjects have higher scores for HA and a higher frequency of homozygous SS or S'S'. More importantly, the results of STUDY II lead to the same direction.

It is well known that anxiety traits are strongly linked to depression and anxiety disorders [2528, 3336, 89] and indeed, the premorbid depressive personality represents an emotional vulnerability that increases the likelihood of developing these disorders during stressful life events. Furthermore, the literature supports the hypothesis that 5-HTTLPR S allele could be a risk factor for major depression/anxiety spectrum disorders [29]. Taking together the two issues, our findings seem to be contradictory. However, recently it has been proposed the hypothesis about a role of the SLC6A4 gene not directly in the MDD susceptibility but rather in the some features of the pathology such as the response/resistance to antidepressant treatment [58], or the interaction with the stressful life events, given the robust correlation between these events and risk of developing depressive symptoms [911, 90].

In our recent paper [8], we have supported the evidence about the modulation of 5-HTTLPR by rs25531 showing that LG haplotype has lower transcriptional efficacy as well as the S allele. Therefore, in STUDY I we conducted association analyses for 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 to investigate the influence of rs25531. The results showed the association with HA in the "disordered group". In light of these data, we speculate that the genotyping of both the functional polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR and rs25531) and the haplotypes analysis should be taken into account in relation to anxiety-related personality traits.

Finally, in STUDY II, because the S allele is much more prevalent in Asians than in Caucasians [41, 49, 58], suggesting that ethnic differences may be a confounding factor in association studies of the 5-HTTLPR genotype, we conducted separate analyses for both populations to avoid biased conclusions. No significant association was found between 5-HTTLPR and either N or HA.

Conclusions

This study supports the following conclusions: 1. A lack of structured psychiatric screening of subjects may produce an important bias in genetic association studies on personality traits using controls. The symptomatology of depressive and anxiety disorders might interfere with anxiety-related traits in possible associations with the serotonin transporter and the higher frequency of the S allele observed in depressed and anxiety disorder patients; 2. The SLC6A4 gene is not involved in anxiety-related traits measured by TCI and NEO in psychiatrically healthy subjects.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health and the CARIPLO Foundation. We thank Luisa Boventi and Francesco Roversi for laboratory support. Furthermore, the authors would like to express sincere gratitude to all the people who participated in the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Genetic Unit, I.R.C.C.S. "San Giovanni di Dio" - Fatebenefratelli
(2)
Department of Philosophy, Pedagogy, Psychology, University of Verona
(3)
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Biology and Genetic Division, University School of Medicine

References

  1. Bouchard TJ, Loehlin JC: Genes, evolution, and personality. Behav Genet. 2001, 31 (3): 243-273. 10.1023/A:1012294324713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Stober G, Riederer P, Bengel D, Lesch KP: Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem. 1996, 66 (6): 2621-2624. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66062621.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Muller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL: Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science. 1996, 274 (5292): 1527-1531. 10.1126/science.274.5292.1527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu XZ, Lipsky RH, Zhu G, Akhtar LA, Taubman J, Greenberg BD, Xu K, Arnold PD, Richter MA, Kennedy JL, et al: Serotonin transporter promoter gain-of-function genotypes are linked to obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78 (5): 815-826. 10.1086/503850.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Zandi PP, Judy JT: The promise and reality of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry. Clin Lab Med. 30 (4): 931-974. 10.1016/j.cll.2010.07.004.Google Scholar
  6. Serretti A, Kato M, De Ronchi D, Kinoshita T: Meta-analysis of serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor efficacy in depressed patients. Mol Psychiatry. 2007, 12 (3): 247-257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Horstmann S, Binder EB: Pharmacogenomics of antidepressant drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 124 (1): 57-73. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.06.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonvicini C, Minelli A, Scassellati C, Bortolomasi M, Segala M, Sartori R, Giacopuzzi M, Gennarelli M: Serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms and treatment-resistant depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 34 (6): 934-939. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.04.020.Google Scholar
  9. Uher R, McGuffin P: The moderation by the serotonin transporter gene of environmental adversity in the etiology of depression: 2009 update. Mol Psychiatry. 15 (1): 18-22. 10.1038/mp.2009.123.Google Scholar
  10. Wankerl M, Wust S, Otte C: Current developments and controversies: does the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) modulate the association between stress and depression?. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 23 (6): 582-587. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833f0e3a.Google Scholar
  11. Caspi A, Hariri AR, Holmes A, Uher R, Moffitt TE: Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. Am J Psychiatry. 167 (5): 509-527. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101452.Google Scholar
  12. Lipsky RH, Hu XZ, Goldman D: Additional functional variation at the SLC6A4 gene. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009, 150B (1): 153-10.1002/ajmg.b.30766.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Wendland JR, Moya PR, Kruse MR, Ren-Patterson RF, Jensen CL, Timpano KR, Murphy DL: A novel, putative gain-of-function haplotype at SLC6A4 associates with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17 (5): 717-723. 10.1093/hmg/ddm343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin J, Cleak J, Willis-Owen SA, Flint J, Shifman S: Mapping regulatory variants for the serotonin transporter gene based on allelic expression imbalance. Mol Psychiatry. 2007, 12 (5): 421-422. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa PT, McCrae RR: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. 1992, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  16. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR: A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993, 50 (12): 975-990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zuckerman M, Cloninger CR: Relationships between Cloninger's, Zuckerman's, and Eysenck's dimension of personality. Pers Individ Differ. 1996, 21 (2): 283-285. 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00042-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sher KJ, Bartholow BD, Wood MD: Personality and substance use disorders: a prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000, 68 (5): 818-829. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. De Fruyt F, De Clercq BJ, van de Wiele L, Van Heeringen K: The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: domain facet and residualized facet descriptions. J Pers. 2006, 74 (2): 479-510. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Munafo MR, Clark TG, Moore LR, Payne E, Walton R, Flint J: Genetic polymorphisms and personality in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2003, 8 (5): 471-484. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Munafo MR, Clark T, Flint J: Does measurement instrument moderate the association between the serotonin transporter gene and anxiety-related personality traits? A meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2005, 10 (4): 415-419. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Munafo MR, Freimer NB, Ng W, Ophoff R, Veijola J, Miettunen J, Jarvelin MR, Taanila A, Flint J: 5-HTTLPR genotype and anxiety-related personality traits: a meta-analysis and new data. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009, 150B (2): 271-281. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30808.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Schinka JA, Busch RM, Robichaux-Keene N: A meta-analysis of the association between the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and trait anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2004, 9 (2): 197-202. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sen S, Burmeister M, Ghosh D: Meta-analysis of the association between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and anxiety-related personality traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004, 127B (1): 85-89. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith DJ, Duffy L, Stewart ME, Muir WJ, Blackwood DH: High harm avoidance and low self-directedness in euthymic young adults with recurrent, early-onset depression. J Affect Disord. 2005, 87 (1): 83-89. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsudaira T, Kitamura T: Personality traits as risk factors of depression and anxiety among Japanese students. J Clin Psychol. 2006, 62 (1): 97-109. 10.1002/jclp.20215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jylha P, Isometsa E: Temperament, character and symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Eur Psychiatry. 2006, 21 (6): 389-395. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.09.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. de Winter RF, Wolterbeek R, Spinhoven P, Zitman FG, Goekoop JG: Character and temperament in major depressive disorder and a highly anxious-retarded subtype derived from melancholia. Compr Psychiatry. 2007, 48 (5): 426-435. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Holsboer F: How can we realize the promise of personalized antidepressant medicines?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008, 9 (8): 638-646. 10.1038/nrn2453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC: The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998, 59 (Suppl 20): 22-33. quiz 34-57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinotti G, Mandelli L, Di Nicola M, Serretti A, Fossati A, Borroni S, Cloninger CR, Janiri L: Psychometric characteristic of the Italian version of the Temperament and Character Inventory--revised, personality, psychopathology, and attachment styles. Compr Psychiatry. 2008, 49 (5): 514-522. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12 (3): 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirano S, Sato T, Narita T, Kusunoki K, Ozaki N, Kimura S, Takahashi T, Sakado K, Uehara T: Evaluating the state dependency of the Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions in patients with major depression: a methodological contribution. J Affect Disord. 2002, 69 (1-3): 31-38. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00329-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marijnissen G, Tuinier S, Sijben AE, Verhoeven WM: The temperament and character inventory in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2002, 70 (2): 219-223. 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00364-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Farmer A, Mahmood A, Redman K, Harris T, Sadler S, McGuffin P: A sib-pair study of the Temperament and Character Inventory scales in major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003, 60 (5): 490-496. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Abrams KY, Yune SK, Kim SJ, Jeon HJ, Han SJ, Hwang J, Sung YH, Lee KJ, Lyoo IK: Trait and state aspects of harm avoidance and its implication for treatment in major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, and depressive personality disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004, 58 (3): 240-248. 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2004.01226.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Strobel A, Brocke B, Ebstein RP: Interektionseffekte monoaminrelevanter genetischer polymorphismen mit traits des TPQ [Interaction effects of monoamine-relevant genetic polymorphisms with traits of the TPQ]. Z Different Diagnost Psychol. 2000, 21: 194-199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003, 327 (7414): 557-560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7 (3): 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ebstein RP, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Frisch A, Osher Y, Belmaker RH: No association between the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region polymorphism and the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) temperament of harm avoidance. Mol Psychiatry. 1997, 2 (3): 224-226. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakamura T, Muramatsu T, Ono Y, Matsushita S, Higuchi S, Mizushima H, Yoshimura K, Kanba S, Asai M: Serotonin transporter gene regulatory region polymorphism and anxiety-related traits in the Japanese. Am J Med Genet. 1997, 74 (5): 544-545. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970919)74:5<544::AID-AJMG18>3.0.CO;2-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazzanti CM, Lappalainen J, Long JC, Bengel D, Naukkarinen H, Eggert M, Virkkunen M, Linnoila M, Goldman D: Role of the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism in anxiety-related traits. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998, 55 (10): 936-940. 10.1001/archpsyc.55.10.936.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Monteleone P, Santonastaso P, Mauri M, Bellodi L, Erzegovesi S, Fuschino A, Favaro A, Rotondo A, Castaldo E, Maj M: Investigation of the serotonin transporter regulatory region polymorphism in bulimia nervosa: relationships to harm avoidance, nutritional parameters, and psychiatric comorbidity. Psychosom Med. 2006, 68 (1): 99-103. 10.1097/01.psy.0000195746.52074.63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ricketts MH, Hamer RM, Sage JI, Manowitz P, Feng F, Menza MA: Association of a serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism with harm avoidance behaviour in an elderly population. Psychiatr Genet. 1998, 8 (2): 41-44. 10.1097/00041444-199800820-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Flory JD, Manuck SB, Ferrell RE, Dent KM, Peters DG, Muldoon MF: Neuroticism is not associated with the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism. Mol Psychiatry. 1999, 4 (1): 93-96. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamer DH, Greenberg BD, Sabol SZ, Murphy DL: Role of the serotonin transporter gene in temperament and character. J Pers Disord. 1999, 13 (4): 312-327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Katsuragi S, Kunugi H, Sano A, Tsutsumi T, Isogawa K, Nanko S, Akiyoshi J: Association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and anxiety-related traits. Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 45 (3): 368-370. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00090-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kazantseva AV, Gaysina DA, Faskhutdinova GG, Noskova T, Malykh SB, Khusnutdinova EK: Polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR, A/G SNP in 5-HTTLPR, and STin2 VNTR) and their relation to personality traits in healthy individuals from Russia. Psychiatr Genet. 2008, 18 (4): 167-176. 10.1097/YPG.0b013e328304deb8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kumakiri C, Kodama K, Shimizu E, Yamanouchi N, Okada S, Noda S, Okamoto H, Sato T, Shirasawa H: Study of the association between the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region polymorphism and personality traits in a Japanese population. Neurosci Lett. 1999, 263 (2-3): 205-207. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00098-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Benjamin J, Osher Y, Kotler M, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Belmaker RH, Ebstein RP: Association between tridimensional personality questionnaire (TPQ) traits and three functional polymorphisms: dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4), serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTTLPR) and catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT). Mol Psychiatry. 2000, 5 (1): 96-100. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000640.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Du L, Bakish D, Hrdina PD: Gender differences in association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and personality traits. Psychiatr Genet. 2000, 10 (4): 159-164. 10.1097/00041444-200010040-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Greenberg BD, Li Q, Lucas FR, Hu S, Sirota LA, Benjamin J, Lesch KP, Hamer D, Murphy DL: Association between the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism and personality traits in a primarily female population sample. Am J Med Genet. 2000, 96 (2): 202-216. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000403)96:2<202::AID-AJMG16>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Herbst JH, Zonderman AB, McCrae RR, Costa PT: Do the dimensions of the temperament and character inventory map a simple genetic architecture? Evidence from molecular genetics and factor analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2000, 157 (8): 1285-1290. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hu S, Brody CL, Fisher C, Gunzerath L, Nelson ML, Sabol SZ, Sirota LA, Marcus SE, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, et al: Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene and neuroticism in cigarette smoking behavior. Mol Psychiatry. 2000, 5 (2): 181-188. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Osher Y, Hamer D, Benjamin J: Association and linkage of anxiety-related traits with a functional polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region in Israeli sibling pairs. Mol Psychiatry. 2000, 5 (2): 216-219. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000660.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmidt NB, Storey J, Greenberg BD, Santiago HT, Li Q, Murphy DL: Evaluating gene × psychological risk factor effects in the pathogenesis of anxiety: a new model approach. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000, 109 (2): 308-320. 10.1037/0021-843X.109.2.308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Samochowiec J, Rybakowski F, Czerski P, Zakrzewska M, Stepien G, Pelka-Wysiecka J, Horodnicki J, Rybakowski JK, Hauser J: Polymorphisms in the dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine transporter genes and their relationship to temperamental dimensions measured by the Temperament and Character Inventory in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychobiology. 2001, 43 (4): 248-253. 10.1159/000054898.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsai SJ, Hong CJ, Cheng CY: Serotonin transporter genetic polymorphisms and harm avoidance in the Chinese. Psychiatr Genet. 2002, 12 (3): 165-168. 10.1097/00041444-200209000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Samochowiec J, Syrek S, Michal P, Ryzewska-Wodecka A, Samochowiec A, Horodnicki J, Zakrzewska M, Kucharska-Mazur J: Polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter and monoamine oxidase A genes and their relationship to personality traits measured by the Temperament and Character Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychobiology. 2004, 50 (2): 174-181. 10.1159/000079111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sen S, Villafuerte S, Nesse R, Stoltenberg SF, Hopcian J, Gleiberman L, Weder A, Burmeister M: Serotonin transporter and GABAA alpha 6 receptor variants are associated with neuroticism. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 55 (3): 244-249. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Szekely A, Ronai Z, Nemoda Z, Kolmann G, Gervai J, Sasvari-Szekely M: Human personality dimensions of persistence and harm avoidance associated with DRD4 and 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004, 126B (1): 106-110. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Thierry N, Willeit M, Praschak-Rieder N, Zill P, Hornik K, Neumeister A, Lenzinger E, Stastny J, Hilger E, Konstantinidis A, et al: Serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) and personality in female patients with seasonal affective disorder and in healthy controls. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004, 14 (1): 53-58. 10.1016/S0924-977X(03)00064-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Park JW, Kim JS, Lee HK, Kim YI, Lee KS: Serotonin transporter polymorphism and harm avoidance personality in chronic tension-type headache. Headache. 2004, 44 (10): 1005-1009. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04194.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Umekage T, Tochigi M, Marui T, Kato C, Hibino H, Otani T, Kohda K, Kato N, Sasaki T: Serotonin transporter-linked promoter region polymorphism and personality traits in a Japanese population. Neurosci Lett. 2003, 337 (1): 13-16. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01291-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lanzagorta N, Alexanderson-Rosas E, Ricalde A, Gomez Caudillo L, Sosa A, Camarena B, Aguilar A, Fresan A, Apiquian R, Nicolini H: [Effect to the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) on personality dimensions in individuals without psychopathology]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006, 34 (5): 303-308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lang UE, Bajbouj M, Wernicke C, Rommelspacher H, Danker-Hopfe H, Gallinat J: No association of a functional polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene promoter and anxiety-related personality traits. Neuropsychobiology. 2004, 49 (4): 182-184. 10.1159/000077363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kim SJ, Kim YS, Choi NK, Hong HJ, Lee HS, Kim CH: Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and personality traits in a Korean population. Neuropsychobiology. 2005, 51 (4): 243-247. 10.1159/000085819.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kremer I, Bachner-Melman R, Reshef A, Broude L, Nemanov L, Gritsenko I, Heresco-Levy U, Elizur Y, Ebstein RP: Association of the serotonin transporter gene with smoking behavior. Am J Psychiatry. 2005, 162 (5): 924-930. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.924.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Jacob CP, Strobel A, Hohenberger K, Ringel T, Gutknecht L, Reif A, Brocke B, Lesch KP: Association between allelic variation of serotonin transporter function and neuroticism in anxious cluster C personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004, 161 (3): 569-572. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ham BJ, Kim YH, Choi MJ, Cha JH, Choi YK, Lee MS: Serotonergic genes and personality traits in the Korean population. Neurosci Lett. 2004, 354 (1): 2-5. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00753-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Hariri AR, Drabant EM, Munoz KE, Kolachana BS, Mattay VS, Egan MF, Weinberger DR: A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62 (2): 146-152. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.2.146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Dragan WL, Oniszczenko W: Association of a functional polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene with personality traits in females in a Polish population. Neuropsychobiology. 2006, 54 (1): 45-50. 10.1159/000095741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Brummett BH, Siegler IC, McQuoid DR, Svenson IK, Marchuk DA, Steffens DC: Associations among the NEO Personality Inventory, Revised and the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region in elders: effects of depression and gender. Psychiatr Genet. 2003, 13 (1): 13-18. 10.1097/00041444-200303000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Cohen H, Buskila D, Neumann L, Ebstein RP: Confirmation of an association between fibromyalgia and serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism, and relationship to anxiety-related personality traits. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46 (3): 845-847. 10.1002/art.10103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Gonda X, Fountoulakis KN, Juhasz G, Rihmer Z, Lazary J, Laszik A, Akiskal HS, Bagdy G: Association of the s allele of the 5-HTTLPR with neuroticism-related traits and temperaments in a psychiatrically healthy population. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009, 259 (2): 106-113. 10.1007/s00406-008-0842-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Lee YS, Han DH, Yang KC, Daniels MA, Na C, Kee BS, Renshaw PF: Depression like characteristics of 5HTTLPR polymorphism and temperament in excessive internet users. J Affect Disord. 2008, 109 (1-2): 165-169. 10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Joo YH, Oh HB, Kim B, Jung SH, Chung JK, Hong JP, Kim CY: No association between 5-HTTLPR and harm avoidance in Korean college students. J Korean Med Sci. 2007, 22 (1): 138-141. 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Hunnerkopf R, Strobel A, Gutknecht L, Brocke B, Lesch KP: Interaction between BDNF Val66Met and dopamine transporter gene variation influences anxiety-related traits. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007, 32 (12): 2552-2560. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Nilsson KW, Damberg M, Ohrvik J, Leppert J, Lindstrom L, Anckarsater H, Oreland L: Genes encoding for AP-2beta and the Serotonin Transporter are associated with the Personality Character Spiritual Acceptance. Neurosci Lett. 2007, 411 (3): 233-237. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Serretti A, Mandelli L, Lorenzi C, Landoni S, Calati R, Insacco C, Cloninger CR: Temperament and character in mood disorders: influence of DRD4, SERTPR, TPH and MAO-A polymorphisms. Neuropsychobiology. 2006, 53 (1): 9-16. 10.1159/000089916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Stein MB, Schork NJ, Gelernter J: Gene-by-environment (serotonin transporter and childhood maltreatment) interaction for anxiety sensitivity, an intermediate phenotype for anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008, 33 (2): 312-319. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Suzuki A, Matsumoto Y, Oshino S, Kamata M, Goto K, Otani K: Combination of the serotonin transporter and norepinephrine transporter gene promoter polymorphisms might influence harm avoidance and novelty seeking in healthy females. Neurosci Lett. 2008, 439 (1): 52-55. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Terracciano A, Balaci L, Thayer J, Scally M, Kokinos S, Ferrucci L, Tanaka T, Zonderman AB, Sanna S, Olla N, et al: Variants of the serotonin transporter gene and NEO-PI-R Neuroticism: No association in the BLSA and SardiNIA samples. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009Google Scholar
  84. Vormfelde SV, Hoell I, Tzvetkov M, Jamrozinski K, Sehrt D, Brockmoller J, Leibing E: Anxiety- and novelty seeking-related personality traits and serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms. J Psychiatr Res. 2006, 40 (6): 568-576. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Schmitz A, Hennig J, Kuepper Y, Reuter M: The association between neuroticism and the serotonin tranporter polymorphism depends on structural differences between personality measures. Pers Individ Differ. 2007, 42 (4): 789-799. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Bachner-Melman R, Dina C, Zohar AH, Constantini N, Lerer E, Hoch S, Sella S, Nemanov L, Gritsenko I, Lichtenberg P, et al: AVPR1a and SLC6A4 gene polymorphisms are associated with creative dance performance. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1 (3): e42-10.1371/journal.pgen.0010042.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Comings DE, Gade-Andavolu R, Gonzalez N, Wu S, Muhleman D, Blake H, Mann MB, Dietz G, Saucier G, MacMurray JP: A multivariate analysis of 59 candidate genes in personality traits: the temperament and character inventory. Clin Genet. 2000, 58 (5): 375-385. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580508.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Saiz PA, Garcia-Portilla MP, Herrero R, Arango C, Corcoran P, Morales B, Bascaran MT, Alvarez V, Coto E, Paredes B, et al: Interactions between functional serotonergic polymorphisms and demographic factors influence personality traits in healthy Spanish Caucasians. Psychiatr Genet.Google Scholar
  89. Minelli A, Pedrini L, Magni LR, Rotondo A: Personality traits in an italian sample: relationship with anxiety and depression. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2009, 5: 26-30. 10.2174/1745017900905010026.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Goldman N, Glei DA, Lin YH, Weinstein M: The serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR): allelic variation and links with depressive symptoms. Depress Anxiety. 27 (3): 260-269. 10.1002/da.20660.Google Scholar
  91. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/50/prepub

Copyright

© Minelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement