Change in level of productivity in the treatment of schizophrenia with olanzapine or other antipsychotics
© Liu-Seifert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 25 June 2010
Accepted: 17 May 2011
Published: 17 May 2011
When treating schizophrenia, improving patients' productivity level is a major goal considering schizophrenia is a leading cause of functional disability. Productivity level has been identified as the most preferred treatment outcome by patients with schizophrenia. However, little has been done to systematically investigate productivity levels in schizophrenia. We set out to better understand the change in productivity level among chronically ill patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine compared with other antipsychotic medications. We also assessed the links between productivity level and other clinical outcomes.
This post hoc analysis used data from 6 randomized, double-blind clinical trials of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with each trial being of approximately 6 months duration. Change in productivity level was compared between olanzapine-treated patients (HGBG, n = 172; HGHJ, n = 277; HGJB, n = 171; HGLB, n = 281; HGGN, n = 159; HGDH, n = 131) and patients treated with other antipsychotic medications (separately vs. haloperidol [HGGN, n = 97; HGDH, n = 132], risperidone [HGBG, n = 167; HGGN, n = 158], quetiapine [HGJB, n = 175], ziprasidone [HGHJ, n = 271] and aripiprazole [HGLB, n = 285]). Productivity was defined as functional activities/work including working for pay, studying, housekeeping and volunteer work. Productivity level in the prior 3 months was assessed on a 5-point scale ranging from no useful functioning to functional activity/work 75% to 100% of the time.
Chronically ill patients treated with olanzapine (OLZ) experienced significantly greater improvement in productivity when compared to patients treated with risperidone (RISP) (OLZ = 0.22 ± 1.19, RISP = -0.03 ± 1.17, p = 0.033) or ziprasidone (ZIP) (OLZ = 0.50 ± 1.38, ZIP = 0.25 ± 1.27, p = 0.026), but did not significantly differ from the quetiapine, aripiprazole or haloperidol treatment groups. Among first episode patients, OLZ therapy was associated with greater improvements in productivity levels compared to haloperidol (HAL), during the acute phase (OLZ = -0.31 ± 1.59, HAL = -0.69 ± 1.56, p = 0.011) and over the long-term (OLZ = 0.10 ± 1.50, HAL = -0.32 ± 1.91, p = 0.008). Significantly more chronically ill and first episode patients treated with olanzapine showed moderately high (>50%-75% of the time) and high levels of productivity (>75%-100% of the time) at endpoint, when compared to risperidone or haloperidol-treated patients (p < .05), respectively. Higher productivity level was associated with significantly higher study completion rates and better scores on the positive, negative, disorganized thoughts, hostility and depression subscales of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS).
Some antipsychotic medications significantly differed in beneficial impact on productivity level in the long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Findings further highlight the link between clinical and functional outcomes, showing significant associations between higher productivity, lower symptom severity and better persistence on therapy.
Schizophrenia is a severe and lifelong mental illness characterized by impairment of most domains of cognitive functioning, often leading to functional disability . Patients with schizophrenia suffer not only from symptoms such as delusions or hallucinations but also impaired occupational functioning and low levels of productivity (e.g., paid employment, being a student, or other useful activity) and high rates of unemployment [2–4].
The poor productivity level among patients with schizophrenia has long been recognized as a core component of the burden of illness and its economic cost [5, 6]. The financial cost of schizophrenia in the United States in 2002 was estimated to be $62.7 billion . In another study of the economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2002, the indirect excess cost due to unemployment was found to be the largest component of the overall excess annual costs .
Improving patients' productivity level is an important goal in the treatment of schizophrenia and was previously identified as the most preferred treatment outcome, more than improvement of symptoms, by clinicians, patients, their families as well as public policy makers . Rosenheck et al. (2005)  evaluated the personal outcome preferences of a large sample of patients treated for schizophrenia and identified work as the 4th preferred outcome among 6 assessed domains including social life, energy, symptoms, work, confusion and treatment-emergent adverse events. Importantly, several clinical guidelines [10–12] cite supported employment programs as one of the most valuable psychosocial treatment interventions for schizophrenia.
Although little is known about predictors of productivity level in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, the link between medication adherence or persistence and functional outcomes has been consistently shown [13–15]. Adherence to antipsychotic treatment is associated with better long-term improvements in outcome measures including decreased risk of psychiatric hospitalizations, detentions, victimizations, substance use, and severity of alcohol-related issues, as well as improvements in mental health and satisfaction with social life in general . In addition, longer treatment duration with antipsychotics (persistence) was found to be associated with improved symptom severity levels  and greater functional outcomes in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia . Recent meta-analyses have shown that antipsychotics significantly differ on their pharmacology, efficacy, safety and tolerability profiles [17, 18]. The choice of antipsychotics may also play a significant role in patients' adherence to or persistence with antipsychotic medications, as adherence and persistence on antipsychotic medication appear to be highly intercorrelated . Olanzapine treatment is associated with better persistence, or lower rates of medication discontinuation for any cause, compared to other antipsychotics [20–24]. Moreover, few studies have suggested that this advantage may be due to the greater efficacy of olanzapine relative to other antipsychotics [21, 22]. However, it is unclear whether these differences have any impact on the patient's productivity level.
Taken together, productivity is a very important area in the treatment of schizophrenia and yet it is largely unstudied. To our knowledge, there has not been any systematic investigation on the comparative productivity among antipsychotic drugs. To address this question, we conducted a post hoc analysis of double-blind, active-controlled trials from Lilly clinical trial database comparing olanzapine with other antipsychotic drugs on change in level of productivity. The links between productivity and symptom severity and between productivity and patients' persistence on therapy were also investigated.
Summary of Baseline Demographics and PANSS Total Scores in Patients with Schizophrenia
PANSS Total Score Mean (SD)
Change from baseline to endpoint in productivity level was compared between olanzapine and other antipsychotic treatment groups (separately versus haloperidol, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole). Productivity was defined as functional activities/work (useful work) including working for pay, being a student, housekeeping, and volunteer work in the past 3 months. Productivity level was assessed by study investigators on a 5-point scale: 1. No useful functioning, 2. > 0 to 25% of the time, 3. > 25% to 50% of the time, 4. > 50% to 75% of the time, 5. > 75% to 100% of the time.
Symptom severity was measured by 5 Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) factor scales: positive, negative, disorganized thoughts, hostility and depression .
Change from baseline to endpoint in productivity level was compared between olanzapine and each of the other antipsychotic medications within the individual study based on an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for baseline productivity score and treatment. Percentage of patients with > 50% to ≤75% ("moderately high") or > 75% ("high") productivity level at endpoint was also compared between treatment groups within each study using Fisher's exact test.
The association between productivity level and treatment persistence was assessed using an ANCOVA model which included terms for baseline productivity score and early treatment discontinuation status (Y/N). In addition, this post hoc analysis used Pearson correlations to assess the relationship between clinical outcomes, measured by the 5 PANSS factors--positive, negative, disorganized thoughts, hostility and depression; and the productivity level at the end of the study.
All statistical tests were based on a 2-tailed significance level of 0.05.
Patient Baseline Characteristics
Table 1 shows baseline clinical and demographic characteristics for patients in each of the 6 studies used in the analysis. The majority of the patients were male and Caucasian. Mean baseline PANSS scores (range = 81.0-101.8) reflected moderate or greater illness severity for most of the patients.
Productivity and chronically ill patients
Change in level of productivity
Level of productivity and symptom severity
Pearson Correlations of Productivity Level with PANSS Factor Scores at Endpoint - Chronically Ill Patients
(n = 307)
(n = 507)
(n = 288)
(n = 516)
(n = 358)
-0.34 [p < .0001]
-0.447 [p < .0001]
-0.31 [p < .0001]
-0.262 [p < .0001]
-0.291 [p < .0001]
-0.37 [p < .0001]
-0.423 [p < .0001]
-0.217 [p < .0002]
-0.306 [p < .0001]
-0.25 [p < .0001]
-0.328 [p < .0001]
-0.471 [p < .0001]
-0.339 [p < .0001]
-0.334 [p < .0001]
-0.363 [p < .0001]
-0.356 [p < .0001]
-0.292 [p < .0001]
-0.099 [p < 0.091]
-0.245 [p < .0001]
-0.159 [p < .0025]
-0.202 [p < .0001]
0.039 [p < 0.502]
-0.185 [p < .0001]
-0.114 [p < .0308]
Pearson Correlations of Productivity Level with PANSS Factor Scores at Endpoint - First Episode Patients
(n = 221)
(n = 221)
-0.347 [p < .0001]
-0.502 [p < .0001]
-0.414 [p < .0001]
-0.493 [p < .0001]
-0.374 [p < .0001]
-0.474 [p < .0001]
-0.22 [p < .0001]
-0.318 [p < .0001]
-0.177 [p < .0001]
-0.296 [p < .0001]
Treatment persistence and productivity level
Productivity and first episode patients
First episode patients change in level of productivity
Level of productivity and symptom severity
Pearson correlations between each of the 5 PANSS factor scale scores and productivity level at the end of the study (Tables 2 and 3) were statistically significant for both the acute phase and the longer-term treatment phases (p < .001) with correlation coefficients ranging between -0.177 (productivity level and depression in the acute phase) and -0.502 (productivity level and negative symptoms in the long-term phase).
Treatment persistence and productivity level
Study completers of the acute and long-term treatment phase had statistically significantly better productivity level scores compared to study dropouts (p < .05) (data not shown).
This is the first study to evaluate improvement in productivity among patients with schizophrenia treated with various antipsychotics. Using data from 6 randomized, double-blind clinical trials of antipsychotic therapy, this post hoc investigation detected significant differences between olanzapine and some of the studied antipsychotics on improvement in level of productivity. Change in level of productivity from baseline was significantly greater in both chronically ill and first episode patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine compared with some of the other antipsychotics. In chronically ill patients, olanzapine treatment was associated with significantly greater improvement in productivity levels compared to risperidone and ziprasidone, but not with quetiapine or aripiprazole. Higher rates of moderately high and high productivity levels at endpoint were also observed with olanzapine- compared to risperidone treatment. For first episode patients treated with olanzapine, significantly higher rates of moderately high and high productivity at endpoint were observed during the acute phase and the long-term treatment phase compared to haloperidol-treated patients.
Current findings are consistent with those reported in a randomized, open label, flexible dose, multi-center study of outpatients with schizophrenia who were assigned to a 1-year treatment with olanzapine or risperidone . In that study, the greatest treatment group difference was found on the occupational/employment outcome measure (p = 0.0024). The present findings are, however, inconsistent with two other schizophrenia studies in which the olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients did not significantly differ on employment outcomes  or job skills learning . This inconsistency may be related to methodological differences and especially to differences in the definition of productivity. For example, we used an ordinal measure of productivity, which encompassed work for pay as well as useful non-paid activity such as volunteer work or being a student, thus possibly being more sensitive to change than the dichotomous measure (i.e., working for pay vs. not working) used previously .
We also found significant associations between productivity level and improvement in symptom severity levels among chronically ill and first episode patients. These findings are consistent with previous schizophrenia research in which symptom improvement and symptom remission were shown to be associated with better functional outcomes [36–39]. While our study found significant associations between productivity level and disorganized thinking, positive symptoms and negative symptoms, previous research has shown that negative symptoms have a more robust link to functional outcomes, with lower PANSS negative symptoms being able to predict functional remission  and paid employment [40–43]. Conversely, poorer employment and occupational functioning were previously found to be strongly predicted by severe negative symptoms [40, 42, 43].
Our analysis also found significant associations between productivity level and persistence on therapy, defined as study completion. In each of the 6 trials, which ranged between 12 (for acute phase) and 28 weeks in duration, the completers had significantly greater improvement in productivity level than patients who dropped out of the study. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that longer duration of antipsychotic treatment is correlated with better functional outcomes, including better occupational functioning, among patients with schizophrenia .
The current study found an advantage for olanzapine therapy on improving productively level compared to treatment with risperidone, ziprasidone, and haloperidol, but not when compared with quetiapine and aripiprazole. Although our post hoc exploratory analysis cannot clarify the underlying drivers of the current results, the findings can be explained using the link previously shown between longer treatment duration and better clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia [21, 22, 44–46]. In meta-analytical studies of antipsychotic therapy for schizophrenia, which incorporated data from numerous randomized clinical trials, olanzapine was found to confer greater efficacy compared to haloperidol  risperidone and ziprasidone . Furthermore, patients treated with olanzapine were consistently found to stay longer on treatment compared to those treated with haloperidol [23, 31, 44–49], risperidone [21, 23, 24, 28, 48–56] and ziprasidone [21, 27, 57–59]. Thus, antipsychotic treatment choice may influence patients' improvement in symptom severity, their treatment duration and their functional outcomes as measured, in this study, by productivity levels.
This study possesses several limitations. First, this is a post hoc analysis of 6 randomized, double-blind clinical trials composed of chronically ill patients with schizophrenia and first episode schizophrenic patients studied over different treatment durations [between 12 (for acute phase) and 28 weeks]. The current findings will require replication in studies assessing these outcomes in an a priori manner. Second, the current analysis was conducted in randomized clinical trials, thus it is unclear if the findings may generalize to schizophrenia patients treated in usual care settings. Lastly, as this research is the first to systematically investigate the productivity levels in treatment of schizophrenia, patients' productivity level was assessed with a single item with 5 response options and the reliability and validity of this productivity measure has not been established yet.
Current findings suggest that antipsychotic medications may significantly differ on beneficial impact on productivity level in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, and highlight the link between clinical and functional outcomes, showing significant associations between higher productivity, lower symptom severity and better persistence on therapy. This post hoc analysis suggests an advantage for olanzapine therapy over several other antipsychotics on improving productivity levels among chronically ill and first episode patients with schizophrenia. This finding will require replication in future research.
We thank Dr Susan Watson for critical review of the manuscript.
- McGurk SR, Lee MA, Jayathilake K, Meltzer HY: Cognitive effects of olanzapine treatment in schizophrenia. MedGenMed. 2004, 6 (2): 27-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Awad AG, Voruganti LN: The burden of schizophrenia on caregivers: a review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008, 26: 149-162. 10.2165/00019053-200826020-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lauriello J, Lenroot R, Bustillo JR: Maximizing the synergy between pharmacotherapy and psychosocial therapies for schizophrenia. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003, 26: 191-211. 10.1016/S0193-953X(02)00017-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lenroot R, Bustillo JR, Lauriello J, Keith SJ: Integrated treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2003, 54: 1499-1507. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.11.1499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goetzel RZ, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S: The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2003, 45: 5-14. 10.1097/00043764-200301000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McEvoy JP: The costs of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007, 68: 4-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu EQ, Birnbaum HG, Shi L, Ball DE, Kessler RC, Moulis M, Aggarwal J: The economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2002. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005, 66: 1122-1129. 10.4088/JCP.v66n0906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shumway M, Saunders T, Shern D, Pines E, Downs A, Burbine T, Beller J: Preferences for schizophrenia treatment outcomes among public policy makers, consumers, families, and providers. Psychiatr Serv. 2003, 54: 1124-1128. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.8.1124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenheck R, Stroup S, Keefe RS, McEvoy J, Swartz M, Perkins D, Hsiao J, Shumway M, Lieberman J: Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2005, 187: 529-536. 10.1192/bjp.187.6.529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline 82. Schizophrenia: Core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in adults in primary and secondary care. [http://www.nice.org.uk/CG082]
- Canadian Psychiatry Association Working Group: Clinical Practice guidelines: treatment of schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry. 2005, 50 (Suppl 1): 1S-56S.Google Scholar
- Dixon LB, Dickerson F, Bellack AS, Bennett M, Dickinson D, Goldberg RW, Lehman A, Tenhula WN, Calmes C, Pasillas RM, Peer J, Kreyenbuhl J, Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull. 2009, 36: 48-70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Weiss KA, Smith TE, Hull JW, Piper AC, Huppert JD: Predictors of risk of nonadherence in outpatients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2002, 28: 341-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ascher-Svanum H, Faries DE, Zhu B, Ernst FR, Swartz MS, Swanson JW: Medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of schizophrenia in usual care. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006, 67: 453-460. 10.4088/JCP.v67n0317.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunayevich E, Ascher-Svanum H, Zhao F, Jacobson JG, Phillips GA, Dellva MA, Green AI: Longer time to antipsychotic treatment discontinuation for any cause is associated with better functional outcomes for patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007, 68: 1163-1171. 10.4088/JCP.v68n0801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu-Seifert H, Adams DH, Kinon BJ: Discontinuation of treatment of schizophrenic patients is driven by poor symptom response: a pooled post-hoc analysis of four atypical antipsychotic drugs. BMC Med. 2005, 3: 21-30. 10.1186/1741-7015-3-21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, Engel RR, Li C, Davis JM: Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009, 373: 31-41. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leucht S, Komossa K, Rummel-Kluge C, Corves C, Hunger H, Schmid F, Asenjo-Lobos C, Schwarz S, Davis JM: A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009, 166: 152-163. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ascher-Svanum H, Zhu B, Faries DE, Lacro JP, Dolder CR, Peng X: Adherence and persistence to typical and atypical antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008, 2: 67-77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kahn RS, Fleischhacker WW, Boter H, Davidson M, Vergouwe Y, Keet IP, Gheorghe MD, Rybakowski JK, Galderisi S, Libiger J, Hummer M, Dollfus S, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Hranov LG, Gaebel W, Peuskens J, Lindefors N, Riecher-Rossler A, Grobbee DE, EUFEST study group: Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2008, 371: 1085-1097. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60486-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, Severe J, Hsiao JK, Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 1209-1223. 10.1056/NEJMoa051688.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinon BJ, Liu-Seifert H, Adams DH, Citrome L: Differential rates of treatment discontinuation in clinical trials as a measure of treatment effectiveness for olanzapine and comparator atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006, 26: 632-637. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000245563.06660.0f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ascher-Svanum H, Zhu B, Faries D, Landbloom R, Swartz M, Swanson J: Time to discontinuation of atypical versus typical antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2006, 6: 8-10.1186/1471-244X-6-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beasley CM, Stauffer VL, Liu-Seifert H, Taylor CC, Dunayevich E, Davis JM: All-cause treatment discontinuation in schizophrenia during treatment with olanzapine relative to other antipsychotics: an integrated analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007, 27: 252-258. 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3180582426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tran PV, Hamilton SH, Kuntz AJ, Potvin JH, Andersen SW, Beasley C, Tollefson GD: Double-blind comparison of olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997, 17: 407-418. 10.1097/00004714-199710000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinon BJ, Noordsy DL, Liu-Seifert H, Gulliver AH, Ascher-Svanum H, Kollack-Walker S: Randomized, double-blind 6-month comparison of olanzapine and quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with prominent negative symptoms and poor functioning. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006, 26: 453-461. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000236658.16286.25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Breier A, Berg PH, Thakore JH, Naber D, Gattaz WF, Cavazzoni P, Walker DJ, Roychowdhury SM, Kane JM: Olanzapine versus ziprasidone: results of a 28-week double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2005, 162: 1879-1887. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kane JM, Osuntokun O, Kryzhanovskaya LA, Xu W, Stauffer VL, Watson SB, Breier A: A 28-week, randomized, double-blind study of olanzapine versus aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009, 70: 572-581. 10.4088/JCP.08m04421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keefe RS, Seidman LJ, Christensen BK, Hamer RM, Sharma T, Sitskoorn MM, Rock SL, Woolson S, Tohen M, Tollefson GD, Sanger TM, Lieberman JA, HGDH Research Group: Long-term neurocognitive effects of olanzapine or low-dose haloperidol in first-episode psychosis. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 59: 97-105. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green AI, Lieberman JA, Hamer RM, Glick ID, Gur RE, Kahn RS, McEvoy JP, Perkins DO, Rothschild AJ, Sharma T, Tohen MF, Woolson S, Zipursky RB, HGDH Study Group: Olanzapine and haloperidol in first episode psychosis: two-year data. Schizophr Res. 2006, 86: 234-243. 10.1016/j.schres.2006.06.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieberman JA, Tollefson G, Tohen M, Green AI, Gur RE, Kahn R, McEvoy J, Perkins D, Sharma T, Zipursky R, Wei H, Hamer RM, HGDH Study Group: Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol. Am J Psychiatry. 2003, 160: 1396-1404. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindenmayer JP, Bernstein-Hyman R, Grochowski S: A new five factor model of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Q. 1994, 65: 299-322. 10.1007/BF02354306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciudad A, Olivares JM, Bousoño M, Gómez JC, Alvarez E: Improvement in social functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia with prominent negative symptoms treated with olanzapine or risperidone in a 1 year randomized, open-label trial. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 30: 1515-1522. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Resnick SG, Rosenheck RA, Canive JM, De Souza C, Stroup TS, McEvoy J, Davis S, Keefe RS, Swartz M, Lieberman JA: Employment outcomes in a randomized trial of second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in the treatment of individuals with schizophrenia. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008, 35: 215-225. 10.1007/s11414-007-9101-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kopelowicz A, Liberman RP, Wallace CJ, Aguirre F, Mintz J: The effects of olanzapine and risperidone on learning and retaining entry-level work skills. Clinical Schizophrenia & related psychoses. 2009, 3: 133-141. 10.3371/CSRP.3.3.2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schennach-Wolff R, Jager M, Seemuller F, Obermeier M, Messer T, Laux G, Pfeiffer H, Naber D, Schmidt LG, Gaebel W, Huff W, Heuser I, Maier W, Lemke MR, Ruther E, Buchkremer G, Gastpar M, Moller HJ, Riedel M: Defining and predicting functional outcome in schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2009, 113: 210-217. 10.1016/j.schres.2009.05.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helldin L, Kane JM, Karilampi U, Norlander T, Archer T: Remission in prognosis of functional outcome: a new dimension in the treatment of patients with psychotic disorders. Schizophr Res. 2007, 93: 160-168. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bodén R, Sundström J, Lindström E, Lindström L: Association between symptomatic remission and functional outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009, 107: 232-237. 10.1016/j.schres.2008.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Hert M, van Winkel R, Wampers M, Kane J, van Os J, Peuskens J: Remission criteria for schizophrenia: evaluation in a large naturalistic cohort. Schizophr Res. 2007, 92: 68-73. 10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marwaha S, Johnson S, Bebbington PE, Angermeyer MC, Brugha TS, Azorin JM, Killian R, Hansen K, Toumi M: Predictors of employment status change over 2 years in people with schizophrenia living in Europe. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2009, 18: 344-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans JD, Bond GR, Meyer PS, Kim HW, Lysaker PH, Gibson PJ, Tunis S: Cognitive and clinical predictors of success in vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004, 70: 331-342. 10.1016/j.schres.2004.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGurk SR, Mueser KT, Harvey PD, LaPuglia R, Marder J: Cognitive and symptom predictors of work outcomes for clients with schizophrenia in supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2003, 54: 1129-1135. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.8.1129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salkever DS, Karakus MC, Slade EP, Harding CM, Hough RL, Rosenheck RA, Swartz MS, Barrio C, Yamada AM: Measures and predictors of community-based employment and earnings of persons with schizophrenia in a multisite study. Psychiatr Serv. 2007, 58: 315-324. 10.1176/appi.ps.58.3.315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Revicki DA, Genduso LA, Hamilton SH, Ganoczy D, Beasley CM: Olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: quality of life and clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Qual Life Res. 1999, 8: 417-426. 10.1023/A:1008958925848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glick ID, Berg PH: Time to study discontinuation, relapse, and compliance with atypical or conventional antipsychotics in schizophrenia and related disorders. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002, 17: 65-68. 10.1097/00004850-200203000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tiihonen J, Wahlbeck K, Lönnqvist J, Klaukka T, Ioannidis JP, Volavka J, Haukka J: Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in a nationwide cohort of patients in community care after first hospitalisation due to schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: observational follow-up study. BMJ. 2006, 333: 224-10.1136/bmj.38881.382755.2F.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ren XS, Kazis LE, Lee AF, Hamed A, Huang YH, Cunningham F, Miller DR: Patient characteristics and prescription patterns of atypical antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002, 27: 441-451. 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00443.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dossenbach M, Erol A, el Mahfoud Kessaci M, Shaheen MO, Sunbol MM, Boland J, Hodge A, O'Halloran RA, Bitter I, IC-SOHO Study Group: Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: interim 6-month analysis from a prospective observational study (IC-SOHO) comparing olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004, 65: 312-321. 10.4088/JCP.v65n0305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tunis SL, Faries DE, Nyhuis AW, Kinon BJ, Ascher-Svanum H, Aquila R: Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine as first-line treatment for schizophrenia: results from a randomized, open-label, 1-year trial. Value Health. 2006, 9: 77-89. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00083.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbody SM, Bagnall AM, Duggan L, Tuunainen A: Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000, 1: CD002306-Google Scholar
- Bagnall AM, Jones L, Ginnelly L, Lewis R, Glanville J, Gilbody S, Davies L, Torgerson D, Kleijnen J: A systematic review of atypical antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia. Health Technol Assessn. 2003, 7: 1-193.Google Scholar
- Leucht S, Barnes TR, Kissling W, Engel RR, Correll C, Kane JM: Relapse prevention in schizophrenia with new-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2003, 160: 1209-1222. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pelagotti F, Santarlasci B, Vacca F, Trippoli S, Messori A: Dropout rates with olanzapine or risperidone: a multi-centre observational study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 59: 905-909. 10.1007/s00228-003-0705-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper D, Moisan J, Grégoire JP: Adherence to atypical antipsychotic treatment among newly treated patients: a population-based study in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007, 68: 818-825. 10.4088/JCP.v68n0601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haro JM, Suarez D, Novick D, Brown J, Usall J, Naber D, SOHO Study Group: Three-year antipsychotic effectiveness in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: observational versus randomized studies results. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007, 17: 235-244. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jayaram MB, Hosalli PM, Stroup TS: Risperidone versus olanzapine for treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007, 33: 1274-1276.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kinon BJ, Lipkovich I, Edwards SB, Adams DH, Ascher-Svanum H, Siris SG: A 24-week randomized study of olanzapine versus ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in patients with prominent depressive symptoms. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006, 26: 157-162. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000204137.82298.06.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soares-Weiser K, Bechard-Evans L, Davis J, Lawson A, Ascher-Svanum H: Meta-analysis of treatment discontinuation for any cause comparing olanzapine and other antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. 15th Biennial Winter Workshop in Psychoses:15-18. 2009, November ; BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- Strom BL, Faich G, Eng E, Reynolds F, D'Agostino RB, Ruskin J, Kane JM: Comparative Mortality Associated with Ziprasidone vs. Olanzapine in Real-World Use: The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC). [Abstract]. European Psychiatry. 2008, 23 (suppl 2): S111-Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/11/87/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.