Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Association between 5-HT2A, TPH1 and GNB3 genotypes and response to typical neuroleptics: a serotonergic approach

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 1, 5
BMC Psychiatry20077:22

  • Received: 08 November 2006
  • Accepted: 23 May 2007
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Schizophrenia is a common psychiatric disease affecting about 1% of population. One major problem in the treatment is finding the right the drug for the right patients. However, pharmacogenetic results in psychiatry can seldom be replicated.


We selected three candidate genes associated with serotonergic neurotransmission for the study: serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) gene, and G-protein beta-3 subunit (GNB3) gene. We recruited 94 schizophrenia patients representing extremes in treatment response to typical neuroleptics: 43 were good responders and 51 were poor responders. The control group consisted of 392 healthy blood donors.


We do, in part, replicate the association between 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism and response to typical neuroleptics. In female patients, C/C genotype was significantly more common in non-responders than in responders [OR = 6.04 (95% Cl 1.67–21.93), p = 0.005] or in the control population [OR = 4.16 (95% CI 1.46–11.84), p = 0.005]. TPH1 A779C C/A genotype was inversely associated with good treatment response when compared with non-responders [OR = 0.59 (95% Cl 0.36–0.98), p = 0.030] or with the controls [OR = 0.44 (95% CI 0.23–0.86, p = 0.016], and GNB3 C825T C/T genotype showed a trend-like positive association among the male patients with a good response compared with non-responders [OR = 3.48 (95% Cl 0.92–13.25), p = 0.061], and a clearer association when compared with the controls [OR = 4.95 (95% CI 1.56–15.70), p = 0.004].


More findings on the consequences of functional polymorphisms for the role of serotonin in the development of brain and serotonergic neurotransmission are needed before more detailed hypotheses regarding susceptibility and outcome in schizophrenia can be formulated. The present results may highlight some of the biological mechanisms in different courses of schizophrenia between men and women.


  • Schizophrenia
  • Clozapine
  • Sibutramine
  • Typical Antipsychotic
  • Conventional Antipsychotic


Schizophrenia is a devastating disease which affects about one percent of people world-wide [1]. Recent studies suggest that the interaction between brain dopaminergic and serotonergic systems is of major significance in the neuropathology and treatment of schizophrenia [2].

The pharmacogenetics of schizophrenia has focused on studying dopamine and serotonin related genes [3]. Several studies have found association between serotonergic genes and response to clozapine [3]. In typical antipsychotics, only few studies were related to dopamine receptor genes and most results were negative for response prediction [3, 4]. Several lines of evidence indicate an important role of serotonergic modulation in the mechanism of action of typical neuroleptics. Although typical neuroleptics act via dopamine-D2 receptor blockade, they all (including haloperidol) affect both dopaminergic and serotonergic receptors [5]. Altered serotonergic response in brain have been reported in treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia [6]. Moreover, haloperidol has been reported to increase 5-HT release in prefrontal cortex [7]. Systemic administration of apomorphine, a dopamine receptor agonist, has been found to both decrease and increase striatal 5-HT release and increase 5-HT release in the hippocampus [7]. Serotonin 5-HT2C receptor affinity is also negatively correlated with the dose of typical neuroleptics. Thus, increasing serotonin 5-HT2C receptor antagonist affinity lowers the potency of typical neuroleptics [8]. It is possible that actions of serotonin receptors in addition to dopamine D2 receptors are relevant to the actions of typical neuroleptics [9].

One study suggests that serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene polymorphism is associated with treatment response to conventional antipsychotics [10]. In meta-analyses 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism has been associated with the risk of schizophrenia [11, 12]. The 5-HT2A T102C C-allele specific methylation has been associated with increased 5-HT2A receptor expression in human temporal cortex [13], and allele-specific methylation has been proposed as a modulator in gene-environment interactions [14].

So far there have been no pharmacogenetic studies of tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) gene polymorphism in schizophrenia. Genetic variation of TPH1 gene has been associated with the risk of schizophrenia in two recently published studies [15, 16]. The TPH 779 A-allele has been connected with lower CSF 5-HIAA concentrations in healthy men [17]. TPH1 is mainly expressed in the pineal gland, and it is responsible for peripheral serotonin response, in contrast to TPH2, which is expressed in the raphe nucleus and directly affects the serotonergic pathways of the brain [18]. The importance of TPH1 comes through possible biological susceptibility through abnormal serotonin levels during the development of brain [19], or through abnormal response to stress [20], which may further indicate mental disorders of several types, and particularly schizophrenia.

The G-protein beta-3 subunit (GNB3) C825T polymorphism (T-allele) results in increased intracellular signal transduction in G-protein coupled receptors [21]. TT genotype or T allele carriers of C825T polymorphism have been associated in three studies with treatment response to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression [2224]. GNB3 C825T polymorphism has been associated with treatment response in various antipsychotic drugs [25] as well as clozapine induced weight gain [26]. In addition, GNB3 polymorphism may predict response of several other serotonergic treatments: triptans [27], sibutramine [28], and electroconvulsive treatment [29]. It is thus suggested that G-protein beta-3 subunit may mediate the serotonergic effect at the second messenger cascade level [30].

We hypothesized that these functional SNPs would alter serotonergic neurotransmission and stress response in the CNS, and might thus be suitable candidate genes for a pharmacogenetic study with typical neuroleptics. The hypothesis was tested in a study design including two groups of schizophrenia patients with a well-documented response, either good or poor to typical neuroleptics, and resembling two different endophenotypes in their course of the disorder and clinical response to treatment. As TPH1 polymorphism is particularly interesting in relation to stress response, which is in part regulated by estrogen [31], we deemed it appropriate to analyse differences in genotype distributions between the men and women in our sample. The genotype distributions were compared between the schizophrenia subgroups and the distributions of control group were also used as a reference.


Patients and controls

The patients were 94 unrelated Finnish patients with schizophrenia. All patients met the criteria for schizophrenia of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV. Group 1 (responders) consisted of patients with schizophrenia who had experienced sufficient and sustained response to treatment with typical antipsychotics. The patients in group 2 (non-responders) had failed to respond to treatment with at least two different typical antipsychotics. Because of poor response to conventional neuroleptics, clozapine was initiated in all patients in the non-responders' group. The control sample consisted of 392 healthy blood donors (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of patient and control groups.


Sex M/F

Age years

Age at onset years

Responders (n = 43)


48.1 ± 11.4

32.2 ± 9.5

Non-responders (n = 51)


44.1 ± 10.5

27.5 ± 10.21



44.4 ± 11.1


1 p = 0.02 compared to responders (chi-square test)

The study was performed in compliance with the code of ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and the standards established by the local ethics committee. The participants gave written informed consent.

The responder group (group I, n = 43; 17 men, 26 women) consisted of patients who had experienced a sufficient and long-lasting response to treatment with conventional antipsychotics. Assessment of response was based on information in hospital and mental health care records and a personal interview with each patient. Before initiation of antipsychotic treatment, the severity of schizophrenia symptoms had to be ≥ 4 according to the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI). The patient records were thoroughly reviewed from the time of the index hospitalization or acute treatment in mental health care to ensure that both the patient's psychotic symptoms had disappeared and the level of functioning had returned to a level corresponding to that prior the psychotic episode. In addition, a clinical interview was conducted with each patient during the time of the study to ascertain that the good response had been sustained. The main conventional antipsychotics used in the index treatment period included chlorpromazine in fifteen, perphenazine, in nine, chlorprothixene in six, zuclopentixole in five, thioridazine in four, haloperidol in three and flupentixole in one of the cases.

The non-responders' group (group II, n = 51; 29 men, 22 women) comprised such patients on clozapine medication who had failed to respond to treatment with two different conventional antipsychotics on at least two different occasions in a hospital setting. In each index treatment period with conventional antipsychotics the lowest accepted daily dose was 400 mg chlorpromazine equivalent for a minimum of four weeks. Prior to the initiation of clozapine treatment the severity of symptoms of schizophrenia had to be ≥ 4 on the CGI Scale, and at least one of the following symptoms had to be present: conceptual disorganization, suspiciousness, hallucinatory behavior, or unusual thought content. The main conventional antipsychotics used in the two index treatment periods included chlorpromazine in 23/8, perphenazine, in 5/2, chlorprothixene in 6/9, zuclopentixole in 6/13, thioridazine in 5/2, haloperidol in 4/13, levomepromazine in 2/2, flupentixole in 0/1 and sulpiride in 0/1 of the cases (the numbers indicating first treatment period/second treatment period).

DNA extraction and genotyping of the TPH1 A218C, A779C, GNB3 C825T and 5-HT2AT102C polymorphisms

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a commercially available kit and BioRobot M48 Workstation according to manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). DNA samples were genotyped by employing the 5' nuclease assay and fluorogenic allele-specific TaqMan MGB probes [32] using the ABI Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The nucleotide sequences of primers and probes used in the PCR were deduced from published sequences deposited in the GenBank and Celera databases and synthesized in conjugation with Applied Biosystems. Validated genotyping assays were used for the TPH1 A779C (rs1799913), 5-HT2A T102C (rs6313) and GNB3 C825T (rs6489738) polymorphisms and custom assay for the TPH1 A218C (rs1800532). PCR reaction containing genomic DNA, 1 × Universal PCR Master Mix, 900 nM of each primer and 200 nM of each probe was performed in 96-well plates using the standard protocol in a total volume of 25 μl. End-point fluorescence was measured and genotype calling carried out by the allelic discrimination analysis module after PCR resulting in clear identification of three genotypes for all polymorphisms studied. All genotyping was performed blind to the clinical formation.

Genotyping of 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism failed in one patient (a non-responder) and in six control subjects.

Statistical analysis

We analysed the distributions of genotypes in both the responders' and the non-responders' group in comparison with the control group, and between both patient groups. The differences of genotype distributions were calculated using Pearson Chi-Square test and odds ratios between groups were calculated from 2 × 2 contingency tables. Differences in age, age at onset and antipsychotic dose between genotype groups were calculated with ANOVA, but no significant differences were found (p > 0.05).

In determining statistical power with the analyses of allele frequencies between schizophrenia subgroups, we assumed 80% of the patients in each group to be correctly classified. With this assumption, the level of statistical power with this analysis was ~0.9. For the analyses in comparisons between patient subgroups and the control group, the odds ratios needed for detecting differences in genotype distributions were calculated with the power level of 0.8. The distributions of different genotypes in the control sample were used as references in these analyses. With a power level of 0.8, the threshold odds ratios between groups in each genotype were 2.5–3.1 for the 5-HT2A polymorphism, 2.5–2.6 for the TPH1 polymorphism, and 2.4–3.4 for the GNB3-825 polymorphism. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS/Win (versions 12.0 and 14.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and PS (version 2.1.31, (Dupont and Plummer 2004)) software. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. The allele frequencies of the genes studied were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.


5-HT2AT102C polymorphism

In female patients, the C/C genotype was more common in non-responders than in responders [OR = 6.04 (95% Cl 1.67–21.93), p = 0.005] or in the control population [OR = 4.16 (95% CI 1.46–11.84), p = 0.005] (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of 5-HT2A, TPH1 and GNB3 gene polymorphisms in the study population.
















responders (n = 43)

17 (39.5)

23 (53.5)

3 (7.0)

14 (32.6)

14 (32.6)2

15 (34.8)

18 (41.9)

20 (46.5)

5 (11.6)



9 (34.6)

14 (53.8)

3 (11.5)

8 (30.8)

9 (34.6)

9 (34.6)

14 (53.9)

7 (26.9)

5 (19.2)



8 (47.1)

9 (52.9)

0 (0.0)

6 (35.3)

5 (29.4)

6 (35.3)

4 (23.5)

13 (76.5)3

0 (0.0)


non-responders (n = 51)

27 (54.0)

19 (38.0)

4 (8.0)

12 (23.5)

28 (54.9)

11 (21.6)

27 (53.0)

22 (43.1)

2 (3.9)



16 (76.2)1

4 (19.0)

1 (4.8)

3 (13.6)

13 (59.1)

6 (27.3)

13 (59.1)

8 (36.4)

1 (4.5)



11 (37.9)

15 (51.7)

3 (10.3)

9 (31.0)

15 (51.7)

5 (17.3)

14 (48.3)

14 (48.3)

1 (3.4)


(n = 392)

166 (43.0)

176 (45.6)

44 (11.4)

106 (27.0)

205 (52.3)

81 (20.7)

218 (55.6)

144 (36.7)

30 (7.7)



77 (43.5)

81 (45.8)

19 (10.7)

42 (23.3)

90 (50.0)

48 (26.7)

107 (59.5)

60 (33.3)

13 (7.2)



89 (42.6)

95 (45.4)

25 (12.0)

64 (30.2)

115 (54.2)

33 (15.6)

111 (52.4)

84 (39.6)

17 (8.0)

Statistics: 1 p = 0.005, OR = 6.04 (95% Cl 1.67–21.93) compared to responders; p = 0.005, OR = 4.16 (95% CI 1.46–11.84) compared to controls

2 p = 0.030, OR = 0.59 (95% Cl 0.36–0.98) compared to non-responders; p = 0.016, OR = 0.44 (95% CI 0.23–0.86) compared to controls

3 p = 0.061, OR = 3.48 (95% Cl 0.92–13.25) compared to non-responders; p = 0.004, OR = 4.95 (95% CI 1.56–15.70) compared to controls

Abbreviations: 5-HT2A: serotonin 2A receptor gene; TPH1: tryptophan hydroxylase 1 gene, GNB3: G-protein beta-3 subunit gene.

TPH1A779C polymorphism

In the total sample, TPH1 C/A genotype was less common in the responders' group compared with non-responders [OR = 0.59 (95% Cl 0.36–0.98), p = 0.030] or with the controls [OR = 0.44 (95% CI 0.23–0.86, p = 0.016] (Table 2).

GNB3C825T polymorphism

In males, there was a trend-like association for C/T genotype to be more common in responders than in non-responders [OR = 3.48 (95% Cl 0.92–13.25), p = 0.061]. In males, C/T genotype was more common in responders than in controls [OR = 4.95 (95% CI 1.56–15.70), p = 0.004] (Table 2).


The study models two endophenotypes of schizophrenia in relation to the response with conventional neuroleptics in comparison with the control subjects. The different allele distributions in patient subgroups compared with controls may indicate some part of the genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia, which has been linked to abnormal stress response, and even more importantly different subgroups of the schizophrenic syndrome. The main problem with the study methodology includes the small patient sample, especially in comparisons between genders, but on the other hand the selection criteria for both subgroups are restricted, resulting in marked differences in the clinical picture between the patient groups, and less variation in the course of the disease within the groups. The selection criteria for these subgroups resulted in more early-onset patients in the non-responder group, as could be expected [33]. There was also a trend for more female patients being selected in the responder group, but this difference was not significant. Different distributions between subgroups could in part be responsible for different treatment effects, although the subgroups were selected according to the response criteria. The comparisons between schizophrenia subgroups and control group were performed in spite of small numbers of patients, and acknowledging that the differences in allele distributions deviated only slightly between the general schizophrenia population and healthy controls, for example with the 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism [11, 12]. These comparisons were necessary due to the strict selection criteria for schizophrenia subgroups, and the distributions of the control group were used as references in these analyses.

5-HT2AT102C polymorphism

We report an association between 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism and response to typical neuroleptics, where C/C genotype was associated with poor response in female patients. Earlier, Joober et al. (1999) reported a similar association in male patients but not in female patients. The study design was very similar in both studies. However, an obvious reason for these different results may be the different gender distribution in these studies. In the study by Joober et al. there were respectively 74.4% and 71.1% males in non-responders and responders. In the present sample, there were 56.9% and 39.5% males in these categories. One explanation for the gender differences detected may be that treatment-resistant women with schizophrenia constitute a severely ill subgroup within schizophrenia [34].

In meta-analysis, 5-HT2A T102C polymorphism has been associated with a small schizophrenia increasing effect [11, 12]. Because of the small sample size in the schizophrenia population, one would predict that such a small contribution could not have been detected in the present sample, and these analyses were therefore excluded from this study.

The occurrence of 5-HT2A T102C C-allele has been found to increase 5-HT2 receptor expression in human temporal cortex [13]. There is evidence that the density of the 5-HT2 receptors is decreased in the prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia, but the results are still contradictory. This phenomenon could reflect the heterogeneity of the disease [35].

TPH1A779C polymorphism

To our knowledge, this is the first report of an association between TPH1 A779C polymorphism and response to typical neuroleptics. We cannot present any conclusive reason why the treatment response was inversely associated with a heterozygous genotype. However, heterosis is a common feature which may occur in up to 50% of all gene associations [36]. So far, the heterozygous C/A genotype has been reported to have a connection with higher degrees of nicotine dependence, a feature strongly associated with schizophrenia [37]. The TPH1 A779C A-genotype has been associated with lowered serotonin metabolite 5-HIAA levels in the CSF [17], and on the other hand the functions of TPH1 are related to stress response, which may be associated with susceptibility to schizophrenia [20]. The role of TPH1 may also be important during maturation of the serotonin neurons in the brain [19].

GNB3C825T polymorphism

Male heterozygous genotype carriers showed a better response to typical neuroleptics. So far heterosis has been reported by only one study, in which Korean male medical students were the more prone to seasonal variation the more often they carried heterozygous genotype of GNB3 polymorphism [38]. It should be noted that several examples suggest that heterosis is gender specific [36]. However, no association between antipsychotic medication response and the occurrence of T-allele, which has been reported to have a GNB3 expression increasing effect [21] was found in this study.


Serotonergic mechanisms may have a greater impact on medication response of schizophrenia than has so far been acknowledged. This approach needs more studies including different endophenotypes of schizophrenia regarding age at onset and medication response. These subgroups are likely to have different susceptibility and treatment response altering factors. The results of this study may give rise to further hypotheses regarding the role of gender in the course and outcome of schizophrenia.



serotonin 2A receptor gene


tryptophan hydroxylase 1 gene


G-protein beta-3 subunit gene



This study was supported by a grant from the Tampere University Hospital Medical Fund. The authors wish to thank Dr. Vesa Lassila, Dr. Markus Roivas, and Dr. Tuula Ristilä for their assistance in patient screening and recruitment, PhD Kari M. Mattila for his contribution in planning the genotypings, Professor Mikko Hurme for recruiting the control subjects, and Ms. Marita Koli, Ms. Nina Kilkku and Ms. Nina Peltonen for their skillful technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Tampere, Medical School, University of Tampere, 33014, Finland
Laboratory of Atherosclerosis Genetics, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, PL 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
Seinäjoki Hospital District, Department of Psychiatry, Hanneksenrinne 7, 60220 Seinäjoki, Finland
Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 13530 Hämeenlinna, Finland
Tampere University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 33380 Pitkäniemi, Finland


  1. Schultz SK, Andreasen NC: Schizophrenia. Lancet. 1999, 353: 1425-1430. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07549-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Werkman TR, Glennon JC, Wadman WJ, McCreary AC: Dopamine receptor pharmacology: interactions with serotonin receptors and significance for the aetiology and treatment of schizophrenia. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targ. 2006, 5: 3-23.Google Scholar
  3. Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, Wong ML, Licinio J, Roots I, Brockmoller J: Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry. 2004, 9: 442-473. 10.1038/ ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanninen K, Katila H, Kampman O, Anttila S, Illi A, Rontu R, Mattila KM, Hietala J, Hurme M, Leinonen E, Lehtimaki T: Association between the C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor gene and schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. 2006, 407: 195-198. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.08.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roth BL, Sheffler DJ, Kroeze WK: Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2004, 3: 353-359. 10.1038/nrd1346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindenmayer JP, Adityanjee , Vital-Herne M, Bark N, Grochowski S, Moynihan N: Heterogeneity of serotonergic response in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1997, 42: 6-12. 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00296-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ichikawa J, Meltzer HY: Relationship between dopaminergic and serotonergic neuronal activity in the frontal cortex and the action of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience. 1999, 249: 90-98. 10.1007/PL00014190.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Richtand NM, Welge JA, Logue AD, Keck PE, Strakowski SM, McNamara RK: Dopamine and Serotonin Receptor Binding and Antipsychotic Efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology.Google Scholar
  9. Ma J, Ye N, Cohen BM: Expression of noradrenergic alpha1, serotoninergic 5HT2a and dopaminergic D2 receptors on neurons activated by typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 30: 647-657. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.11.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Joober R, Benkelfat C, Brisebois K, Toulouse A, Turecki G, Lal S, Bloom D, Labelle A, Lalonde P, Fortin D, Alda M, Palmour R, Rouleau GA: T102C polymorphism in the 5HT2A gene and schizophrenia: relation to phenotype and drug response variability. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1999, 24: 141-146.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Williams J, McGuffin P, Nothen M, Owen MJ: Meta-analysis of association between the 5-HT2a receptor T102C polymorphism and schizophrenia. EMASS Collaborative Group. European Multicentre Association Study of Schizophrenia. Lancet. 1997, 349: 1221-10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62413-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abdolmaleky HM, Faraone SV, Glatt SJ, Tsuang MT: Meta-analysis of association between the T102C polymorphism of the 5HT2a receptor gene and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004, 67: 53-62. 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00183-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Polesskaya OO, Aston C, Sokolov BP: Allele C-specific methylation of the 5-HT2A receptor gene: evidence for correlation with its expression and expression of DNA methylase DNMT1. J Neurosci Res. 2006, 83: 362-373. 10.1002/jnr.20732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdolmaleky HM, Smith CL, Faraone SV, Shafa R, Stone W, Glatt SJ, Tsuang MT: Methylomics in psychiatry: Modulation of gene-environment interactions may be through DNA methylation. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004, 127: 51-59. 10.1002/ajmg.b.20142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li D, He L: Meta-analysis shows association between the tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) gene and schizophrenia. Hum Genet. 2006, 120: 22-30. 10.1007/s00439-006-0190-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zaboli G, Jonsson EG, Gizatullin R, Asberg M, Leopardi R: Tryptophan hydroxylase-1 gene variants associated with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 60: 563-569. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsson EG, Goldman D, Spurlock G, Gustavsson JP, Nielsen DA, Linnoila M, Owen MJ, Sedvall GC: Tryptophan hydroxylase and catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms: relationships to monoamine metabolite concentrations in CSF of healthy volunteers. Eur Arch Psy Clin N. 1997, 247: 297-302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Patel PD, Pontrello C, Burke S: Robust and tissue-specific expression of TPH2 versus TPH1 in rat raphe and pineal gland. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 55: 428-433. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakamura K, Sugawara Y, Sawabe K, Ohashi A, Tsurui H, Xiu Y, Ohtsuji M, Lin QS, Nishimura H, Hasegawa H, Hirose S: Late developmental stage-specific role of tryptophan hydroxylase 1 in brain serotonin levels. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 530-534. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1835-05.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark MS, Russo AF: Tissue-specific glucocorticoid regulation of tryptophan hydroxylase mRNA levels. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1997, 48: 346-354. 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00106-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Siffert W, Rosskopf D, Siffert G, Busch S, Moritz A, Erbel R, Sharma AM, Ritz E, Wichmann HE, Jakobs KH, Horsthemke B: Association of a human G-protein beta3 subunit variant with hypertension. Nat Genet. 1998, 18: 45-48. 10.1038/ng0198-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zill P, Baghai TC, Zwanzger P, Schule C, Minov C, Riedel M, Neumeier K, Rupprecht R, Bondy B: Evidence for an association between a G-protein beta3-gene variant with depression and response to antidepressant treatment. Neuroreport. 2000, 11: 1893-1897. 10.1097/00001756-200006260-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Serretti A, Lorenzi C, Cusin C, Zanardi R, Lattuada E, Rossini D, Lilli R, Pirovano A, Catalano M, Smeraldi E: SSRIs antidepressant activity is influenced by G beta 3 variants. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003, 13: 117-122. 10.1016/S0924-977X(02)00154-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee HJ, Cha JH, Ham BJ, Han CS, Kim YK, Lee SH, Ryu SH, Kang RH, Choi MJ, Lee MS: Association between a G-protein beta 3 subunit gene polymorphism and the symptomatology and treatment responses of major depressive disorders. Pharmacogenomics J. 2004, 4: 29-33. 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Muller DJ, De Luca V, Sicard T, King N, Hwang R, Volavka J, Czobor P, Sheitman BB, Lindenmayer JP, Citrome L, McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Meltzer HY, Kennedy JL: Suggestive association between the C825T polymorphism of the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3) and clinical improvement with antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005, 15: 525-531. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang YC, Bai YM, Chen JY, Lin CC, Lai IC, Liou YJ: C825T polymorphism in the human G protein beta3 subunit gene is associated with long-term clozapine treatment-induced body weight change in the Chinese population. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2005, 15: 743-748.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schurks M, Kurth T, Stude P, Rimmbach C, de Jesus J, Jonjic M, Diener HC, Rosskopf D: G Protein b3 Polymorphism and Triptan Response in Cluster Headache. Clin Pharmacol Ther.Google Scholar
  28. Hauner H, Meier M, Jockel KH, Frey UH, Siffert W: Prediction of successful weight reduction under sibutramine therapy through genotyping of the G-protein beta3 subunit gene (GNB3) C825T polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics. 2003, 13: 453-459. 10.1097/00008571-200308000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Anttila S, Huuhka K, Huuhka M, Rontu R, Hurme M, Leinonen E, Lehtimäki T: Interaction between 5-HT1A and BDNF genotypes increases the risk of treatment-resistant depression. J Neural Transm.Google Scholar
  30. Serretti A, Lorenzi C, Cusin C, Zanardi R, Lattuada E, Rossini D, Lilli R, Pirovano A, Catalano M, Smeraldi E: SSRIs antidepressant activity is influenced by G beta 3 variants. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003, 13: 117-122. 10.1016/S0924-977X(02)00154-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gundlah C, Alves SE, Clark JA, Pai LY, Schaeffer JM, Rohrer SP: Estrogen receptor-beta regulates tryptophan hydroxylase-1 expression in the murine midbrain raphe. Biol Psychiatry. 2005, 57: 938-942. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Livak KJ: Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay. Genet Anal. 1999, 14: 143-149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meltzer HY, Rabinowitz J, Lee MA, Cola PA, Ranjan R, Findling RL, Thompson PA: Age at onset and gender of schizophrenic patients in relation to neuroleptic resistance. Am J Psychiatry. 1997, 154: 475-482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Szymanski S, Lieberman J, Pollack S, Kane JM, Safferman A, Munne R, Umbricht D, Woerner M, Masiar S, Kronig M: Gender differences in neuroleptic nonresponsive clozapine-treated schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry. 1996, 39: 249-254. 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00138-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Abi-Dargham A, Laruelle M, Aghajanian GK, Charney D, Krystal J: The role of serotonin in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia. J Neuropsychiatry Cli Neurosci. 1997, 9: 1-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Comings DE, MacMurray JP: Molecular heterosis: a review. Molecular Genet Metab. 2000, 71: 19-31. 10.1006/mgme.2000.3015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Reuter M, Hennig J: Pleiotropic effect of the TPH A779C polymorphism on nicotine dependence and personality. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005, 134: 20-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee HJ, Sung SM, Han CS, Kim YK, Kim SH, Lee MS, Joe SH, Jung IK, Kim L: G-protein beta3 subunit C825T polymorphism tends to be associated with seasonal variation in young male college students. Neuropsychobiology. 2005, 52: 135-139. 10.1159/000087559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Anttila et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.