Skip to main content

Regulatory, clinical, and educational approaches to eliminating restraint and seclusion

Background

In response to national media attention on restraint and seclusion (R/S), state and national efforts in the USA have organized around the goal of eliminating their use. Several states/organizations have significantly reduced and stopped using these violent procedures. Participants will learn: 1) How some states/organizations changed treatment practice to prevent inpatient violence, 2) Why an understanding of trauma and factors contributing to treatment violence are essential, 3)Why the consumer and family voice is of key importance, 4) What state and national data indicates about the success of these efforts.

Methods

Massachusetts implemented a R/S prevention initiative after a process of data, literature, and better practice reviews. Leadership prioritized the effort and promoted education for staff. Ongoing training, strategic planning, and teaching helped to shift the ownership of the effort. Inpatient providers became equally responsible for the outcome. Effective culture change constructs/strategies were identified, helped to inform a federal initiative (SAMHSA/NASMHPD-NTAC), and were included in an emerging evidence-based curriculum of "Core Strategies" [1] to prevent and reduce treatment violence and coercion.

Results

Massachusetts' child/adolescent hospitals decreased their use of mechanical restraint by 85% and medication restraint by 88%. Some programs stopped using R/S altogether. These changes induced hope and reduced costs [2].

Conclusion

The use of R/S can be prevented and reduced to a level where it occurs rarely. Effective strategies have been identified and are being implemented. Courageous, focused leadership, at all levels of each organization involved in this type of process, is key to the success of this culture change effort.

References

  1. 1.

    National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning: Curriculum for the Reduction of Seclusion and Restraint. 2006, National Executive Training Institute [NETI]. Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    LeBel J, Goldstein R: The economic cost of restraint and the value added by restraint reduction or elimination. Psychiatr Serv. 2005, 56: 1109-1114. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice Lebel.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lebel, J. Regulatory, clinical, and educational approaches to eliminating restraint and seclusion. BMC Psychiatry 7, S133 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-7-S1-S133

Download citation

Keywords

  • Culture Change
  • National Effort
  • Educational Approach
  • Prevention Initiative
  • Ongoing Training