Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Psychiatry

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Self-ordered pointing and visual conditional associative learning tasks in drug-free schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients

  • Emilio Sacchetti1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Alessandro Galluzzo2, 3,
  • Adelaide Panariello2, 3,
  • Giovanni Parrinello5 and
  • Stefano Francesco Cappa6
BMC Psychiatry20088:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-6

Received: 16 May 2007

Accepted: 23 January 2008

Published: 23 January 2008

Abstract

Background

There is evidence of a link between schizophrenia and a deficit of working memory, but this has been derived from tasks not specifically developed to probe working memory per se. Our aim was to investigate whether working memory deficits may be detected across different paradigms using the self-ordered pointing task (SOPT) and the visual conditional associative learning task (VCALT) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy controls. The current literature suggests deficits in schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients versus healthy controls but these studies frequently involved small samples, broad diagnostic criteria, inclusion of patients on antipsychotic medications, and were not controlled for symptom domains, severity of the disorder, etc. To overcome some of these limitations, we investigated the self-monitoring and conditional associative learning abilities of a numerically representative sample of healthy controls and a group of non-deteriorated, drug-free patients hospitalized for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with florid, mainly positive psychotic symptoms.

Methods

Eighty-five patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 71) or schizophreniform disorder (n = 14)) and 80 healthy controls entered the study. The clinical picture was dominated by positive symptoms. The healthy control group had a negative personal and family history of schizophrenia or mood disorder and satisfied all the inclusion and exclusion criteria other than variables related to schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Results

Compared to controls, patients had worse performances on SOPT, VCALT and higher SOPT/VCALT ratios, not affected by demographic or clinical variables. ROC curves showed that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio had good accuracy in discriminating patients from controls. The SOPT and VCALT scores were inter-correlated in controls but not in patients.

Conclusion

The selection of a clinically homogeneous group of patients, controlled for a number of potential confounding factors, and the high level of significance found in the different analyses confirm the presence of SOPT and VCALT abnormalities in a large preponderance of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder with positive symptoms. SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio showed good accuracy in discriminating patients from healthy controls. These conclusions cannot be extended to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with a different clinical profile from our patient population.

Background

A number of independent lines of evidence support the existence of a link between schizophrenia and a deficit of working memory. Many patients with schizophrenia share impairment of the processes responsible for the on-line maintenance of information necessary to select task-appropriate action [1, 2]. Furthermore, working memory participates in many domains of functioning which are critical in schizophrenia [3, 4]. The study of working memory is a valuable tool to investigate the prefrontal cortex [5], a brain region central to many leading hypotheses of schizophrenia [6].

Because most of the available evidence is derived from tasks not specifically developed to probe working memory per se, we wanted to investigate whether working memory deficits may be detected across different paradigms [1]. Within this perspective, a deeper understanding of the performance of schizophrenia patients on the self-ordered pointing task (SOPT) [79] and the visual conditional associative learning task (VCALT) [912] seems appropriate, given that these two tasks have been less extensively studied than others.

The SOPT, originally devised by Petrides and Milner [7], assesses the capacity to initiate and execute a sequence of responses with self-monitoring of performance and makes considerable demands on working memory as subjects must constantly compare responses already made with those remaining. Self-monitoring is considered an important aspect of executive function [13]. The VCALT [9, 10] is based on the ability to learn associations between a set of stimuli and a set of responses; these fixed associations are acquired through a process of "trial and error learning", consisting of the ability to discriminate between past correct and incorrect responses and using this information to guide response selection. Some PET evidence suggests that the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex, which comprises cytoarchitectonic Brodmann areas 46 and 9, may be associated with the performance of non-spatial self-ordered pointing tasks, while the adjacent area 8 of the posterior-dorsolateral frontal cortex may be activated during conditional associative learning tasks [9, 14].

The current literature on SOPT [1517] and VCALT [1820] consistently supports the presence of deficits in schizophrenia patients versus healthy controls. However, these studies frequently involved small samples, utilized broad diagnostic criteria, included patients taking antipsychotic medications, and did not control for symptom domains, severity of the disorder and other putative sources of variation.

In an attempt to overcome some of these limitations, we investigated the self-monitoring and the conditional associative learning abilities of a numerically representative sample consisting of healthy controls and a group of non-deteriorated, drug-free patients hospitalized for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder with florid, mainly positive psychotic symptoms.

Methods

Subjects

All consenting males and females consecutively and voluntarily admitted over a 2-year period to the Brescia University and Spedali Civili Psychiatric Service were included, provided that they fulfilled predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria at the screening visit.

Inclusion criteria were a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia, paranoid type, or of schizophreniform disorder [21] with prevalent delusional and/or hallucinatory symptoms, a minimum total score of 80 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [22], a score of 4 or more on at least two items of the PANSS positive subscale, a minimum antipsychotic drug-free interval of 4 weeks for oral formulations and 6 weeks for depot formulations, a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) [23] score higher than 24, a total intelligence quotient (IQ) score on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) [24] higher than 75, and a level of understanding, cooperativeness and attention sufficient enough to perform neuropsychological tests and give informed consent after a detailed explanation of the procedures and the nature of the study. Exclusion criteria were older than 75 years, current diagnoses of DSM-IV-TR axis 1 or 2 co-morbid disorders, a history of substance-related disorders in the preceding 6 months, evidence of head trauma or seizures at any time during the lifespan, concomitant medical or neurological disorders presumptively able to affect the neuropsychological performance, and positive qualitative assays for alcohol and/or substance of abuse. Operatively, all participants underwent detailed clinical interviews implemented, when required, by a DSM-IV-TR adjusted version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV) [25]. Predominance of positives symptoms was defined as a PANSS positive/negative subscale score ratio >1. The PANSS, the MMSE, and the WAIS-R were administered on the day following the screening visit and before starting on antipsychotic medication. Patients were also evaluated for age at the onset of schizophrenia. To establish this, the appearance of the first psychotic symptoms represented the pre-identified cut-off; in order to reach as accurate estimates as possible, direct information from patients was systematically retrieved along with data obtained from at least one close relative plus, when possible, previous medical reports.

The control group consisted of doctors, nurses, employees, and attendants of Brescia Spedali Civili, students of Brescia University, or their relatives. For recruitment, the controls had to be unrelated to other prospective participants, be unaware of the nature of the neuropsychological tasks involved in the study, have a negative personal and family history of schizophrenia and mood disorders, and satisfy all the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the patients, with the exception of those schizophrenia-related variables. All controls underwent detailed clinical interviews implemented, when required, by the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies [26] for controls. To exclude a positive family history for psychosis and mood disorders, the controls and, in cases of doubt, their family members were interviewed following an ad hoc questionnaire, which incorporated in-depth information on first-degree relatives and more general data on second-degree relatives.

Patients and controls were also questioned about their school education.

A team of qualified psychiatrists were in charge of data collection, after training and assessment of inter-rater reliability. Reliability was estimated using videotapes played by actors in which 20 cases with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder or a mood disorder with psychotic features were represented (Cohen's Kappa = 0.80, P < 0.001 for schizophrenia diagnosis; Pearson's r = 0.91, P < 0.01 for PANSS score, Pearson's r = 0.92, P < 0.01 for age at disease onset).

DSM-IV-TR related variables were independently evaluated by two physicians and, in the case of discordance, a joint revision of the material took place in the presence of an independent referee who made the final decision after discussion. Rating scales and the remaining variables were rated by only one physician, on rotation.

All the procedures used in this study are an integral part of the routine employed at the Brescia University and Spedali Civili Psychiatric Unit. Therefore patients were requested to provide only a written informed consent for the utilization of data for research purposes, after they received an explanation about the aims of the study and the lack of economic interest. The invited partecipants had also an explicit guarantee of anonymity and the impossibility of identification datails as a unique number linked all the individual data.

Sample key features

The sample consisted of 165 subjects of Italian ancestry: 71 schizophrenia patients, 14 schizophreniform disorder patients, and 80 healthy volunteers. Patients and controls did not differ from each other in age (36 ± 12 vs. 34 ± 10 years, t = 0.82, P = 0.411), sex distribution (49/36 vs. 37/43 male/female ratio, chi squared = 2.1, P = 0.411), and educational level (10.5 ± 3.9 vs. 10.1 ± 2.5 years of school, t = 0.22, P = 0.823). Patients and controls were also comparable as to the MMSE (29.11 ± 0.93 vs 29.29 ± 0.90, t = 1.27, P = 0.204) and the IQ (93.89 ± 4.95 vs 94.85 ± 4.71, t = 1.268, P = 0.207) scores.

Patients had a severe disorder (PANSS total score: mean 98, median 98, 95% CI 86–110) and showed wide inter-individual variability of both age at disease onset (years: mean 27.4, median 25, 95% CI 20–32) and duration of the disorder (years: mean 7.99, median 5, 95% CI 2–12). At the screening visit, 17 and 68 patients were drug-naive and drug-free, respectively. Among the drug-free patients, the last prescription involved second-generation antipsychotics in 85% of the cases.

Neuropsychological tests

Once enrolled, patients and controls were assessed with both the SOPT and the VCALT. The SOPT and the VCALT do not have a pre-defined time limit; they are completed in about 7 and 13 min, respectively. To minimize possible influences on performance played by even subtle differences in the explanation of the two tasks, SOPT and VCALT were described using standardized written texts. The description of the two tests, the control and assistance during their completion, and the recording of the results were carried out by one of the psychiatrists responsible for the recruitment and the collection of all the data.

Briefly, the SOPT is based on four identical series of eight cards. On each card, the same eight black and white abstract designs are represented with a different, casual distribution. After explanation by the examiner on the type of performance required, the first card is disclosed. At this point, the candidate is invited to choose one of the eight designs. Then the second card is presented and the candidate is requested to select one of the seven remaining, unidentified designs. Thereafter, the candidate is invited to choose one design among those previously not selected whenever a new card is shown. The test ends after the same procedure is repeated for the second, third, and fourth card series. The SOPT score is given by the number of wrong answers, that is how many times the candidate selected, within each card series, a previously identified design.

The VCALT is based on eight identical series of four cards. The four cards of a series contain the same four black and white abstract designs but differ from each other in the internal distribution of the designs and the presence of a coloured strip (yellow, blue, green, or red) on the top. Before starting and after the explanation about how the test works, the examiner arbitrarily decides to associate any design with a specific colour. At this point the candidate, completely unaware of the four pre-established design-colour associations, uncovers the first card, links one of the four designs with the colour of the top strip, and receives from the examiner a communication whether the choice corresponds to the pre-established association or not. The same procedure is repeated with the second, the third, and the fourth card, respectively. Once the first card series is completed, the search for the same design-colour associations is renewed for the other seven card series, the initial choices of the examiner remaining valid. The final VCALT score is given by the number of correct answers, that is how many times the candidate correctly identified the pre-established design-colour associations.

During the two tests, the examiner registered the correct and incorrect answers without any comment about the performance.

In order to obtain some information about the independence or the interdependence of the two tasks, the SOPT and VCALT values were also to calculate a supplementary unitary index, the SOPT/VCALT ratio.

Statistical analyses

Rough data, expressed as means (SD) or median (IQR) if continuous and as percentages if categorical, were analysed by the t-test or the chi-squared test. The possible confounding effects of key baseline characteristics on SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT values were studied by multivariate linear regression analyses. Logistic regression analyses were utilized to obtain the SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT adjusted odds ratios relative to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with respect to healthy controls. ROC analyses of the SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT values were performed in order to confirm the ability of the three neuropsychological measures to discriminate patients from controls and to estimate the best cut-offs, that is the values that minimize the absolute difference between sensitivity and specificity. The same ROC cut-offs valid for the VCALT, SOPT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio were then used to evaluate the positive and negative likelihood ratios which provide a direct estimate of how much the three neuropsychological values change the odds of having a schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Inter-rater reliability was estimated using Cohen's kappa or Pearson's r according to the type of variable considered.

All the statistical analyses were performed using the 'R Language' freeware statistical package [27].

P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients differed remarkably from healthy controls in that they had more SOPT wrong answers, less VCALT right answers, and higher SOPT/VCALT ratios (Table 1). Patients with schizophrenia and those with schizophrenia spectrum disorder did not differ in SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT values although a numerical advantage of patients with schizophreniform disorder emerged for the VCALT (Table 2). Furthermore, the SOPT and the VCALT scores were inter-correlated with each other in healthy controls but not in schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Test performance for SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT ratio of schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients and healthy control subjects

 

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders patients (n = 85)

Controls (n = 80)

Test statisticsa

 

Mean (SD)

Median

25–75th percentile

Mean (SD)

Median

25–75th percentile

t

p

SOPT (wrong answers)

6.8 (2.4)

7.0

5.0–8.0

3.4 (1.6)

3

2.0–4.0

11.74

<0.001

VCALT (right answers)

18.5 (5.7)

18

14.5–23.0

23.5 (4.2)

24.0

21.0–26.0

6.40

<0.001

SOPT/VCALT ratio

0.42 (0.23)

0.364

0.25–0.50

0.15 (0.09)

0.125

0.09–0.20

12.32

<0.001

aWilcoxon test.

Table 2

SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT ratio: comparison between schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder patients

 

Schizophrenia patients (71)

Schizophreniform disorder patients (14)

F (1,83)

P

 

Mean ± SD

Median

25–75th percentile

Mean ± SD

Median

25–75th percentile

  

SOPT

6.8 ± 2.3

7.00

5.0–8.0

7.1 ± 2.6

7.0

5.3–8.8

0.22

0.639

VCALT

17.8 ± 5.5

18

14.0–22.0

21.4 ± 6.5

22.0

16.5–26.3

3.80

0.055

SOPT/VCALT

0.43 ± 0.24

0.37

0.27–0.5

0.37 ± 0.19

0.3

0.25–0.45

1.10

0.292

aWilcoxon test.

Figure 1

Correlations between the performances on SOPT and VCALT in healthy controls and schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients.

Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT values were not significantly affected by age, gender, and educational level in both the patient and the control groups and by duration of the disorder, age at the disease onset, and PANSS total score in the patient group (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariate linear regression analyses of variables potentially affecting SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT values in patients and healthy controls

 

SOPT

VCALT

SOPT/VCALT

 

Beta

SE

P

Beta

SE

P

Beta

SE

P

Patients ( n = 85)

         

Intercept

7.7415

1.956

0.0002

16.534

4.798

0.0009

0.54

0.195

0.0071

Age

0.0399

0.087

0.6485

0.107

0.214

0.6167

-0.0000

0.009

0.9982

Gender (f)

1.1765

0.627

0.0644

0.606

1.538

0.6945

0.039

0.062

0.5345

Educational level

-0.0443

0.066

0.5042

0.255

0.162

0.1188

-0.0089

0.007

0.1805

Duration of the disorder

-0.0282

0.087

0.7471

-0.227

0.214

0.2907

0.0046

0.009

0.5950

Age at onset

-0.0694

0.081

0.3952

-0.065

0.199

0.7441

-0.0032

0.008

0.6947

PANSS total

-0.0025

0.016

0.8763

-0.013

0.039

0.7395

0.0001

0.002

0.9463

Controls ( n = 80)

         

Intercept

1.6488

0.161

0.0000

4.7161

0.208

0.0000

0.3710

0.052

0.0000

Age

0.0041

0.003

0.1990

-0.003

0.004

0.4390

0.0011

0.001

0.2830

Gender (f)

0.0635

0.072

0.3840

0.0860

0.094

0.3620

0.0043

0.023

0.8540

Educational level

-0.0026

0.010

0.8060

0.0173

0.014

0.2110

-0.0032

0.003

0.3530

Case vs control

0.7756

0.0713

0.0000

-0.5809

0.0921

0.0000

0.2479

0.023

0.0000

Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT adjusted for age, gender, and educational level discriminate schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients from controls (Table 4).
Table 4

Logistic regression including the performances on SOPT, VCALT, age and educational level

 

Odds-ratioa

Lower

Upper

P

SOPT

39.63

13

120

<0.001

VCALT

0.18

0.09

0.34

<0.001

SOPT/VCALT

35.91

12

108

<0.001

aAdjusted for age, gender and educational level.

The ROC analyses confirmed a valuable patient-control separation as the SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT areas under the curve exceeded 0.5 (Fig. 2), and demonstrated that a SOPT score >5, a VCALT score <21, and a SOPT/VCALT ratio >0.24 gave the best discriminatory accuracy (Fig. 2 and Table 5). Moreover, ROC positive and negative likelihood ratios for the three neuropsychological measures indicated numerically lower, though not statistically significant, odds for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder utilizing the VCALT rather than the SOPT or the SOPT/VCALT ratio cut-off (Table 6).
Figure 2

Areas under the ROC curves of SOPT, VCALT and SOPT/VCALT ratio.

Table 5

ROC areas under the curves (AUC) and cut-off values

 

AUC

SE

z value

Lower 0.95

Upper 0.95

Cut-offsa

SOPT

0.89

0.025

15.7

0.84

0.94

5.00

VCALT

0.76

0.038

6.8

0.69

0.83

21.00

SOPT/VCALT

0.90

0.025

16.3

0.85

0.95

0.24

a"Abnormal" performance: SOPT ≥ 5; VCALT ≤ 21; SOPT/VCALT ≥ 0.24.

Table 6

ROC positive and negative likelihood ratiosa

 

Positive likelihood

Lower 0.95

Upper 0.95

Negative likelihood

Lower 0.95

Upper 0.95

SOPT

5.1

3.0

10.3

0.34

0.23

0.47

VCALT

3.6

2.2

6.6

0.49

0.36

0.65

SOPT/VCALT

6.0

3.6

11.4

0.20

0.12

0.32

aThe likelihood ratio incorporates both the sensitivity and specificity of the test and provides a direct estimate of how much a test result will change the odds of having a disease.

Discussion and conclusion

Three key points best summarize the results of our study. First, acute patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder performed worse in SOPT and VCALT and had higher SOPT/VCALT ratios versus a group of healthy controls matched for age, sex, and educational level. Second, the cut-offs derived from the ROC curves showed that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio had good accuracy in discriminating patients from controls. Third, the SOPT and the VCALT performances were inter-correlated with each other in the healthy controls but not in the patient group.

These results are not likely due to chance. Indeed, the sample of patients and controls was sizeable; the selection criteria limited the recruitment a priori to a rather clinically homogeneous group of patients, and a discrete number of possible demographic and clinical confounders had been statistically controlled. Given that important limitations inherent in many pre-existing studies on the same tasks [1520] have been bypassed, the conclusion that a large preponderance of intellectually normal, non-deteriorated, antipsychotic drug-free schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with a florid phase of psychosis dominated by positive symptoms have evident SOPT and VCALT deficits seems therefore fully supported.

However, the adoption of stringent criteria for the selection of the patients is both a strength and a weakness of the study because it prevents generalization of the results to schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients with different clinical features and/or currently exposed to antipsychotic medications.

Within these definite boundaries, some further comments can be made. As far as the timing of appearance of SOPT and VCALT abnormalities is concerned, the lack of any correlation with the duration of the disorder in a sample of patients that included a significant minority of subjects with schizophreniform disorder suggests that the observed defects are likely to be phenotypic expressions of underlying processes which have been structured and operant at least since the beginning of the illness. However, this conclusion does not exclude the possibility that, in the long-term, the progress of the psychosis and/or the inevitable associated pharmacological manipulation could exert supplementary effects on the two tasks. The observed trend for a worse VCALT performance of schizophrenia patients versus those with a schizophreniform disorder could fit with this last possibility.

The result that SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT ratio abnormalities were frequently but not systematically associated in patients with otherwise largely common clinical features could be compatible with the hypothesis that two tasks are sustained by only partially coincident mechanisms.

The ROC likelihood ratios suggest more frequent dysfunction of the SOPT and agree with the proposal [28, 29] that deficits in self-monitoring play a principal role when positive symptoms dominate the clinical picture.

Since self-monitoring ability and conditional associative learning also involve the participation of other relevant cognitive processes such as attention, active memory, and inhibition, it seems acceptable to place our results within the general scenario of the "context processing" theory of cognitive dysfunctions of schizophrenia [3033]. The involvement of multiple cognitive processes in the generation of SOPT and VCALT performance makes the search for a restricted anatomic specificity of the two tasks overtly hard and naive, even though neuroimaging [9, 34] and lesion [7, 10, 12] studies suggest different roles for the Brodmann areas 46 and 9 and Brodmann area 8 in the spatial self-ordered pointing tasks and conditional associative learning, respectively.

The loss of correlation between SOPT and VCALT moving from healthy controls to patients may infer that a structural and/or functional disruption of the normally cooperative action between the networks involved should also exist in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Within this proposal, a relative redundancy of the impairment of one network with respect to the other and/or a pathology of circuits crucial for their connection could be advocated. While we wait for direct investigations with neuroimaging techniques and multiple neuropsychological tasks, it is of interest to remember that functional disconnectivity has been proposed as crucial in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia [35] and that abnormal cortical functional connectivity has been demonstrated during impaired working-memory tasks [3642].

In conclusion, further research seems warranted in order to firmly establish how much the SOPT and the VCALT paradigms may represent a valid tool to evaluate working memory in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders. The issues that merit priority are: whether and to what degree the individual SOPT, VCALT, and SOPT/VCALT values are stable over time, are affected by various treatments with antipsychotics, and are influenced by symptom clusters outside those of the positive domain.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was partially supported by a grant (project 153) from the Health Authority of the Lombardia Region, Italy.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Brescia University School of Medicine
(2)
University Psychiatric Unit, Brescia University School of Medicine and Brescia Spedali Civili
(3)
Department of Mental Health, Brescia Spedali Civili
(4)
Center on Behavioural and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Brescia University and EULO
(5)
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies Section of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Brescia University School of Medicine
(6)
Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Vita e Salute San Raffaele University

References

  1. Lee J, Park S: Working memory impairment in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005, 114: 599-611. 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barch DM: What can research on schizophrenia tell us about the cognitive neuroscience of working memory?. Neuroscience. 2006, 139: 73-84. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldman-Rakic PS: Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. J Neuropsychiatry. 1994, 6: 348-357.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Weinberger DR, Berman KF: Prefrontal function in schizophrenia: confounds and controversies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1996, 351: 1495-1503. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Keefe RSE: The contribution of neuropsychology to psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1995, 152: 6-15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Honey GD, Fletcher PC: Investigating principles of human brain function underlying working memory: what insights from schizophrenia?. Neuroscience. 2006, 139: 59-71. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Petrides M, Milner B: Deficits on subject-ordered tasks after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia. 1982, 20: 249-262. 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90100-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shimamura A, Jurica P: Memory interference effects and aging: Findings from a test of frontal lobe function. Neuropsychology. 1994, 8: 408-412. 10.1037/0894-4105.8.3.408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Petrides M, Alivisatos B, Evans AC, Meyer E: Dissociation of human mid-dorsolateral from posterior dorsolateral frontal cortex in memory processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 873-877. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.873.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Petrides M: Deficits on conditional associative-learning after frontal and temporal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia. 1985, 23: 601-614. 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90062-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Petrides M: Nonspatial conditional learning impaired in patients with unilateral frontal but not unilateral temporal lobe excisions. Neuropsychologia. 1990, 28: 137-149. 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90096-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Petrides M: Visuo-motor conditional associative learning after frontal and temporal lobe lesions in the human brain. Neuropsychologia. 1997, 35: 989-997. 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00026-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tranel D, Anderson SW, Benton A: Development of the concept of "executive function" and its relationship to the frontal lobes. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Edited by: Boller F, Grafman J. 1994, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 9: 125-148.Google Scholar
  14. Petrides M, Pandya DN: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection patterns. Eur J Neurosci. 1999, 11: 1011-1036. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00518.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganzevles PG, Hoenen MA: A preliminary study of externally and self-ordered task performance in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1995, 16: 67-71. 10.1016/0920-9964(94)00061-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stone M, Gabrieli JD, Stebbings GT, Sullivan EV: Working memory and strategic memory deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology. 1998, 12: 278-288. 10.1037/0894-4105.12.2.278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chey J, Lee J, Kim YS, Kwon SM, Shin YM: Spatial working memory span, delayed response and executive function in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2002, 110: 259-271. 10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00105-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gold JM, Bish JA, Viannone VN, Hobart MP, Queern CA, Buchanan RW: Effects of contextual processing on visual conditional associative learning in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2000, 48: 406-414. 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00930-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemali D, Maj M, Galderisi S, Monteleone P, Mucci A: Conditional associative learning in drug-free schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychobiology. 1987, 17: 30-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rushe TM, Woodruff PWR, Murray RM, Morris RG: Episodic memory and learning in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1999, 35: 85-96. 10.1016/S0920-9964(98)00117-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2000, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 4Google Scholar
  22. Kay SR, Opler LA, Fiszbein A: The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987, 13: 261-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: "Mini Mental State". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975, 12: 189-198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wechsler D: WAIS-R Manual. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised. 1981, New York: The Psychological CorporationGoogle Scholar
  25. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structural clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders, clinician version (SCID-CV). 1996, Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, IncGoogle Scholar
  26. Nurnberger JI, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J, Severe JB, Malaspina D, Reich T: Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994, NIMH Genetics Initiative, 5: 849-859.Google Scholar
  27. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2005, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
  28. Frith CD, Done DJ: Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1989, 153: 437-443.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Frith CD, Friston KJ, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS: PET imaging and cognition in schizophrenia. J R Soc Med. 1992, 85: 222-224.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D: Context, cortex and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev. 1992, 99: 45-77. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Servan-Schreiber D, Cohen JD, Steingard S: Schizophrenia deficits in the processing of context. A test of a theoretical model. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996, 53: 1105-1112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Braver TS, Barch DM, Cohen JD: Cognition and control in schizophrenia: A computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function. Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 46: 312-328. 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00116-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cohen JD, Barch DM, Carter C, Servan-Schreiber D: Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999, 108: 120-133. 10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Frith CD, Friston KJ, Herold S, Silbersweig D, Fletcher P, Cahill C, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS, Liddle PF: Regional brain activity in chronic schizophrenia patients during performance of verbal fluency task. Br J Psychiatry. 1995, 167: 343-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bertolino A, Esposito G, Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Van Horn JD, Frank JA, Berman KF, Weinberger DR: Specific relationship between prefrontal neuronal N-acetylaspartate and activation of the working memory cortical network in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2000, 157: 26-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fuster JM: Synopsis of function and dysfunction of the frontal lobe. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999, 51-57. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb05983.x. Suppl 395Google Scholar
  37. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Poline JB, Kohn PD, Holt JL, Egan MF, Weinberger DR, Berman KF: Evidence for abnormal cortical functional connectivity during working memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1809-1817. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Olsen RK, Kohn PD, Brown T, Egan MF, Weinberger DR, Berman KF: Regionally specific disturbance of dorsolateral prefrontal-hippocampal functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005, 62: 379-386. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pantelis C, Barnes TRE, Nelson HE, Tanner S, Weatherley L, Owen AM, Robbins TW: Frontal-Striatal cognitive deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Brain. 1997, 120: 1823-1843. 10.1093/brain/120.10.1823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Peled A, Geva AB, Kremen WS, Blankfeld HM, Esfandiarfard R, Nordahl TE: Functional connectivity and working memory in schizophrenia: an EEG study. Int J Neurosci. 2001, 106: 47-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlosser R, Gesierich T, Kaufmann B, Vucurevic G, Stoeter P: Altered effective connectivity in drug-free schizophrenic patients. Neuroreport. 2003, 14: 2233-2237. 10.1097/00001756-200312020-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlosser R, Gesierich T, Kaufmann B, Vucurevic G, Hunsche S, Gaewehn J, Stoeter P: Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling. Neuroimage. 2003, 19: 751-763. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00106-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/6/prepub

Copyright

© Sacchetti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement