Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Trends in levels of self-reported psychological distress among individuals who seek psychiatric services over eight years: a comparison between age groups in three population surveys in Stockholm County

BMC PsychiatryBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:345

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1499-4

Received: 16 June 2017

Accepted: 2 October 2017

Published: 11 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Psychiatric service use has increased in Sweden and in other developed countries, particularly among young people. Possible explanations include lower threshold for help-seeking among young people, but evidence is scarce.

Methods

We analysed the 2002, 2006 and 2010 Stockholm public health surveys for changes in the mean level of psychological distress among adult users of psychiatric in- and outpatient services in four age groups: 18–24, 25–44, 45–64 and ≥65 years. Psychological distress was measured via the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), using the Likert scoring method 0–1–2-3. In- and out-patient psychiatric service use within 6 months from the surveys was obtained from registers.

Results

The mean level of distress among young adults 18–24 years who utilize psychiatric services decreased between 2002 (mean GHQ-12 score, 95% confidence interval 20.5, 18.1–23.0) and 2010 (16.2, 14.6–17.7), while it remained fairly stable in older age groups. Results were similar in sex-stratified analyses, although the decrease was statistically significant only among young women 18–24 years. At the end of the follow-up, the level of distress among patients was similar for all age-groups.

Conclusions

There were no differences between age groups in the level of distress when seeking care at the end of the follow-up period, supporting that there is no age-specific over- or under-consumption of psychiatric care in later years. However, the lowered threshold for help-seeking among young adults over time might have contributed to increases in psychiatric service use in the young age group. Public health policy and service delivery planning should consider the needs of the widening group of young users of psychiatric services.

Keywords

Trends Psychological distress Psychiatric service use Young adults Help-seeking

Background

The use of mental health services appears to have increased in Sweden and in other developed countries, particularly among young people [18]. In Sweden, mental health service use has increased sharply among children (<18 years) and young adults (≤29 years) while remained stable or showed smaller increases in older age groups since the 1990ies [3, 4]. Studies from USA also report sharper increases in mental health service use among the young (<20 years) compared to older age groups during the past decades [1, 2, 8].

It could be hypothesized that increased prevalence of mental ill-health explains increases in service use. Many studies have, indeed, reported increasing long-term trends in self-reported psychological distress and self-harm among young people in developed countries since the 1980s [3, 5, 913]. However, several population-based studies on the prevalence of clinically significant depression and anxiety indicate stable levels of these disorders during recent years [14, 15].

Although psychiatric morbidity is a strong predictor of mental health service use, factors such as the social acceptability of mental illness, awareness about mental health problems, access to mental health services, increasing adherence to clinical practice standards by mental care providers, as well as a broadening conceptualization of mental illness and the perceived need for care are also important, as discussed by PLOS Medicine editors [16] and supported by several studies [1719]. All of these factors may have increased help-seeking for mental health problems also among less severe cases, which might explain increases in service use. In this regard, the characteristics of the widening group of users of psychiatric services could provide some important insights. For example, reduced symptom severity among individuals who seek mental health care would imply a lower threshold for help-seeking in recent years. Yet, no population-based study has examined levels of psychological distress among users of psychiatric services in different age groups and whether there have been changes over time. Some studies [20, 21] have indicated lower threshold for seeking mental health care among children. There is a need to understand these patterns among adults in order to inform policy makers and service delivery planners about the healthcare needs of the population.

Here we examine whether there are differences between age groups in their levels of distress when seeking care, and if these patterns change over time. We examine levels of self-reported psychological distress in relation to psychiatric in-patient and outpatient service use among young adults as compared to older age groups. We utilize three large population-based representative samples from Stockholm County, Sweden, collected four and eight years apart.

Methods

Study population

We used data from the Stockholm Public Health Surveys in the years 2002 (n = 23,771), 2006 (n = 34,667) and 2010 (n = 30,730) [22]. The sampling frame consisted of residents of Stockholm County who were listed in the Swedish Total Population Register. For each survey, an area-stratified random sample of adults aged 18–84 years (2002, 2006) or 18 years and older (2010) was invited to complete self-administered questionnaires assessing a variety of health, lifestyle and social characteristics. A complete description of the surveys and the available questionnaire-based data has been published elsewhere [22]. In total N = 49,909, N = 56,634, and N = 55,341 individuals were invited to participate in 2002, 2006 and 2010, respectively. Response rates were 62.5% in 2002, 61.5% in 2006 and 55.6% in 2010. Participants in the 2002 survey were followed up with a new questionnaire in 2007 when they were asked for informed consent. The 2002 subsample comprises only those participants in the 2002 survey who provided informed consent in the 2007 follow-up (2002–2007 retention rate 76%). Non-responders were more likely to be men, born outside Sweden, under age 45, single or separated, and unemployed or low-income [22]. The surveys assessed psychological distress using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) [23]. As all Swedish residents receive a unique personal identification number at birth or upon obtaining a residency permit, we were able to link respondents of the Stockholm Public Health Surveys to a range of administrative and health care registers. We were, thus, able to identify survey respondents that had prospectively used psychiatric care within six months following each survey. In total there were 2276 participants in the Stockholm Public Health Surveys who used psychiatric services, including 538 participants from the 2002 survey, 920 from the 2006 survey and 818 from the 2010 survey, who comprise our study population. Individuals with missing data on GHQ-12 (n = 31) were excluded from the final analytical sample (N = 2245).

Psychological distress

Psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) [23], which has been validated for use in the Swedish population [24, 25]. Item scores were coded according to the Likert method (0–1–2-3) [26] and a total GHQ-12 score ranging from 0 to 36 was computed. Internal missing was small, with 1.4% who did not complete the entire GHQ scale.

Psychiatric service use

Data on psychiatric service use was collected from the Information and Statistics Division, Stockholm County Council, which collates a centralized database including all mental health service utilization. From this database, we obtained all inpatient episodes and all out-patient contacts at psychiatric clinics, including visits to private psychiatrists contracted by Stockholm County Council, in Stockholm County within 6 months of participating in each survey.

Covariates

Information on age and sex were obtained from administrative registers. We categorized age as: 18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and 65 years or older. We supplemented the dataset with information from the Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labour Market Studies (Swedish acronym LISA). Potential confounders included country of birth (coded as Sweden or other), level of educational attainment (compulsory, upper secondary, higher education), household disposable income quartiles, and being gainfully employed (Yes/No). Internal missing was small and limited to education (2.9%).

Ethical considerations

Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants and ethical approval for the study was granted by the Stockholm Regional Ethical Review Board.

Data analyses

All analyses were carried out in the statistical software SAS v. 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA). We performed regression analyses using dummy variables. Since the data were collected with area-stratified random samples, we used the SURVEYREG procedure in SAS 9.3 to calculate adjusted least square means and confidence intervals (CIs). We compared mean GHQ-12 scores and 95% CIs for participants in different age groups (18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and 65 years or older) who used psychiatric services. F-tests were used for trend analysis over time. Characteristics such as sex, country of birth, education, household disposable income and having gainful employment were adjusted for. We also examined results in a sex-stratified model. In sensitivity analyses, regression analyses were repeated for psychiatric service use within a shorter follow-up time of two months.

Weights were used to correct for the stratified random sample design as well as systematic non-response. Statistics Sweden provided the non-response calibration weights on the basis of available auxiliary variables from national registries, their association with selected variables from the surveys and association with probability of participating in the survey. The auxiliary variables included sex, age, country of birth, civil status, income, educational level, sickness allowance and area of residence [27].

Results

There was an increase in overall psychiatric service use progressively with each wave of survey, such that the proportion of survey participants using psychiatric services increased from 2.5% in 2002 to 2.9% and 3.2% in 2006 and 2010, respectively (F = 7.58, p = 0.0005) (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of participants in the 2002, 2006 and 2010 Stockholm Public Health Surveys

 

2002 survey

2006 survey

2010 survey

 

% weighted sample

 

% weighted sample

 

% weighted sample

 
 

All, n = 23, 771

Psychiatric service usersa, n = 538 (2.5% of survey n)

All, n = 34,667

Psychiatric service usersa, n = 920 (2.9% of survey n)

All, n = 30,730

Psychiatric service usersa, n = 818 (3,2% of survey n)

Women

51.3

65.3

50.9

65.3

51.2

62.7

Age group

      

 18–24 years

12.1

15.8

10.8

14.2

12.0

21.2

 25–44 years

41.4

54.2

40.0

45.4

36.9

42.6

 45–64 years

32.6

26.2

33.3

33.9

31.3

29.6

 65+ years

13.9

3.9

15.9

6.5

19.8

6.7

Born outside Sweden

23.1

23.2

22.9

26.3

24.6

21.7

Education

      

 Compulsory

20.6

22.8

20.9

21.9

21.9

28.3

 Upper secondary

43.9

42.8

41.4

43.9

39.7

38.5

 Higher

35.5

34.4

37.7

34.2

38.5

33.2

Income

      

 Lower quartile

30.5

44.2

30.4

43.6

30.4

38.4

 2nd quartile

24.3

27.5

23.7

26.2

24.2

33.2

 3d quartile

22.9

17.9

22.8

18.3

23.4

18.5

 Highest quartile

22.3

10.4

23.1

12.00

22.0

10.0

 Being gainfully employed

70.2

54.7

63.2

43.8

62.7

45.9

Mean GHQ-12 Likert score by age group

      

 18–24 years

11.4

19.7

11.0

16.7

10.6

15.2

 25–44 years

11.1

17.2

10.5

16.3

10.1

16.0

 45–64 years

10.4

15.3

10.0

15.3

9.9

16.2

 65+ years

9.5

13.0

9.4

13.5

9.3

12.7

aPsychiatric service use within 6 months from the survey

Table 1 also shows the prevalence of covariates (unweighted and weighted) among all survey participants and the patient subgroup. Women, participants with lower income, and those without gainful employment, were more likely to use psychiatric services. Among the patients, there seemed to be a relative shift in age-groups between the 2000 and 2010 surveys, with 18–24 year olds becoming a proportionately larger group in psychiatric care. There was no increase in mean GHQ scores in the entire survey population across the three surveys. In the patient group, there was a higher mean GHQ score (unadjusted) among the young compared to older age groups in 2002, which declined over time.

Table 2 and fig. 1 show the adjusted mean levels of psychological distress across age groups among psychiatric service users (n = 2245). Adjustment for confounders seemed to slightly increase estimates of mean levels of distress among patients. In 2002, those in the young age group (18–24 years) seeking psychiatric care appeared to have higher levels of distress as compared to age groups older than 44 years (p < 0.001 for comparison to both the 45–64 and the 65+ years age groups). This was true also for those aged 25–44 years (p < 0.05 for comparison to both the 45–64 and the 65+ years age groups). However, mean levels of distress among young patients (18–24 years) decreased significantly between 2002 and 2010. This trend was also discernible among those 25–44 years old, resulting in similar mean levels of distress among those seeking psychiatric care at end of follow-up (year 2010) for those under 65 years. Patients older than 65 years appeared to have a lower mean level of self-reported distress overall years. Formal test of interaction between age groups and surveys found no statistical evidence of an interaction in terms of probability of service use (p = 0.229).
Table 2

Mean level of psychological distress among users of psychiatric services in different age groups (n = 2245)

 

Year of survey

 
 

2002

2006

2010

 
 

Mean GHQ-12 scorea, 95% CI

F-test for trend 2002–2010

Age group

    

 18–24 years

20.5 (18.1–23.0)

17.0 (15.2–18.8)

16.2 (14.6–17.7)

p = 0.005

 25–44 years

17.8 (16.6–19.1)

16.9 (15.9–17.8)

16.5 (15.4–17.7)

p = 0.22

 45–64 years

16.0 (14.7–17.3)

15.5 (14.5–16.5)

16.0 (14.8–17.3)

p = 0.69

 65+ years

12.9 (10.1–15.8)

13.8 (11.3–16.3)

13.1 (11.3–14.8)

p = 0.78

aAdjusted for sex, country of birth, education, household disposable income and being gainfully employed

Fig. 1

Mean levels of psychological distress among participants in the Stockholm Public Health Surveys who use psychiatric services, in 2002, 2006 and 2010

Tables 3 and 4 show results of sex-stratified analyses. There was a decreasing trend in mean levels of distress among male patients up to 44 years of age, however, it was not statistically significant. No clear pattern was found among male patients in older age groups (Table 3). Among female patients, there was a clear downward trend in mean levels of distress in the young age group (18–24 years), while no such trend was found in older age groups (Table 4).
Table 3

Mean level of psychological distress among male users of psychiatric services (n = 690)

 

Year of survey

 
 

2002

2006

2010

 
 

Mean GHQ-12 scorea, 95% CI

F-test for trend 2002–2010

Age group

    

 18–24 years

21.9 (17.7–26.2)

18.0 (15.5–20.5)

17.5 (14.6–20.3)

p = 0.13

 25–44 years

18.6 (16.3–21.0)

16.9 (15.4–18.3)

15.8 (14.0–17.6)

p = 0.12

 45–64 years

15.7 (13.7–17.7)

15.7 (13.8–17.6)

14.2 (12.3–16.2)

p = 0.41

 65+ years

13.8 (11.5–16.0)

14.3 (10.1–18.4)

15.9 (12.4–19.4)

p = 0.49

aAdjusted for country of birth, education, household disposable income and being gainfully employed

Table 4

Mean level of psychological distress among female users of psychiatric services (n = 1586)

 

Year of survey

 
 

2002

2006

2010

 
 

Mean GHQ-12 scorea, 95% CI

F-test for trend 2002–2010

Age group

    

 18–24 years

20.1 (17.4–22.9)

16.8 (14.4–19.1)

15.7 (13.9–17.6)

p = 0.04

 25–44 years

18.1 (16.7–19.4)

17.2 (16.1–18.4)

17.4 (15.9–18.9)

p = 0.65

 45–64 years

16.8 (15.0–18.5)

15.6 (14.5–16.7)

17.6 (16.1–19.1)

p = 0.08

 65+ years

12.6 (8.0–17.2)

13.7 (10.6–16.8)

12.5 (10.6–14.3)

p = 0.69

aAdjusted for country of birth, education, household disposable income and being gainfully employed

In sensitivity analyses, the pattern of changes in mean levels of psychological distress among adults in different age groups who used psychiatric services within two months from the surveys was similar to that for service use up to six months from the surveys (data not shown).

Discussion

This study examines trends in levels of psychological distress among individuals who use psychiatric services in different age groups in the general adult population of Stockholm County, Sweden, over a period of eight years. At the beginning of the study period in 2002, young adults ages 18–24, and to some extent also those 25–44 years old, who utilized psychiatric services, appeared to have higher level of distress as compared to older age groups. However, in contrast to patients in older age groups who underwent little change in mean levels of psychological distress between 2002 and 2010, younger patients had a decrease in mean level of distress during this period, although only significant for the youngest (18–24 years of age). At the end of the study period in 2010, there were no longer differences in mean levels of distress among patients of working age (18–64 years). Mean population levels of psychological distress remained stable or decreased while psychiatric service use increased during the study period, indicating that factors other than increased prevalence of psychiatric morbidity might explain increases in service use. Our findings indicate that this increase in service use might partly be explained by a lowering of threshold for seeking mental health services among young people in Sweden during the first decade of the twenty-first century and that there are no specific patterns of under- or overconsumption in any age-group at the end of follow-up period.

Our finding of a decrease in mean level of psychological distress among young adults who use psychiatric services corroborates findings in previous studies among children and adolescents. A study from USA [1] that examined trends in mental health service use in youth between 1996 and 1998 and 2010–2012 found that youth with less severe or no mental health impairment, measured by parental reports, accounted for most of the absolute increases in service use. A study from Finland found increases in the parental perceived need for mental health care and mental health service utilization among children, but stable levels in children’s mental health problems since the 1990s [18]. Their results indicated decreasing long-term trends in the parental threshold for seeking mental health services for children in Finland. Lastly, a recent study from Great Britain found that while parental and teacher reports of children’s mental health problems decreased during the first decade of the twenty-first century, the teacher- and parental- perceived impact of such problems increased during the same period [19].

One limitation of previous literature is that parental reports have shown to be less valid than self-reports in rating mental health problems in children and adolescents [26, 27]. Our study is the first to assess self-reported psychological distress in relation to service utilization among adult age groups, and adds that average severity of symptoms in young adults utilizing psychiatric services has decreased during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Taken together, these results support the notion that there has been a lowering of threshold for seeking psychiatric services among younger age groups.

A possible explanation for a lower threshold of help seeking is that the perceived need for mental health care has increased among young people in these countries. Young people in developed countries are facing rising educational demands and competitive job markets, as well as an increasing range of potential social roles and opportunities. Such challenging prospects may generate stronger expectations regarding an individual’s level of functioning and increase the perceived need for mental health care. In addition, broader conceptualization of mental illness and increased accessibility of mental health services may have enhanced help-seeking.

Furthermore, increased societal emphasis on young peoples' psychosocial health and awareness of the importance of early recognition and treatment of psychiatric problems might have improved young peoples´ attitude towards use of psychiatric services. Previous studies have shown young people to be reluctant to seek mental health care and efforts have been put to improve mental health and service utilization in the young age group [28, 29]. We found that while young adults who utilized psychiatric services had a higher level of psychological distress at the beginning of the study period, compared to older adults, there was no difference in mean levels of distress among patients in working-age age groups eight years later. These findings support the notion that young people were previously underrepresented within psychiatric care services in relation to their level of mental ill-health, compared to other age groups, and that this has been eliminated during recent years.

It remains to be known how much a previous underrepresentation of young people within psychiatric services, or an increase in the perceived need for care in the young age group, have contributed to our results. Nevertheless, our study clearly shows that there has been a relative shift in age groups among psychiatric patients in Stockholm County, with young adults becoming a relatively larger patient group.

Thus, our results have implications for service planning and policies regarding provision of mental health care. There seems to be a widening group of young users of psychiatric services and the needs as well as mental health and social outcomes in this group merit further research. The use of psychiatric services at a lower threshold in young adults emphasizes the need to improve mental health services for young people outside specialised psychiatric clinics as well as to enhance mental well-being for those in the young age group. This is also, of course, valid for older age groups, who, at the end of our study, had similar levels of distress at care seeking. Lastly, despite increases in service use, still only a proportion of individuals with mental disorders seek mental health treatment, regardless of age group [30]. Thus, health services should continuously seek to improve access to mental health care.

The large population-based samples collected over a period of eight years and the combined use of self-reported and register-based data are some strengths of this study. Attrition is a limitation of the study, albeit accounted for, to some extent, by calibration weights. The GHQ-12 has been shown to measure psychological distress regardless of age [21, 31], but the stability of levels of distress over time has not been tested in different age groups. If chronicity of distress differs between age groups, that may have influenced levels of service use within six months in our study. However, results of sensitivity analyses revealed a similar pattern of change in levels of psychological distress among patients that used psychiatric services up to two months from the surveys as compared to six months, though statistical power was limited. Another limitation is that we measure psychological distress with a self-report questionnaire, which implies imperfect sensitivity and specificity to psychiatric morbidity compared with diagnostic interviews. However, this imprecision is likely to be similar across the surveys and would not affect the trend. Previous studies have shown psychological distress measured by the GHQ to be an adequate index of psychiatric morbidity and predictive of impaired functioning and mental health care utilization [22, 23, 32], Lastly, we did not have information on care for mental health problems in primary care, which is a limitation of our study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found a lowering of mean level of psychological distress among young adults in the population that use psychiatric services during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Thus, a lower threshold for help-seeking among young people might explain the recent increase in psychiatric service use in Sweden and perhaps in other developed countries. Yet, at end of follow-up there were no differences between age-groups in level of distress among those seeking care, supporting that there is no age specific over/under consumption of psychiatric care in later years. The needs of the widening group of young users of psychiatric services merit further research.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Jill Åhs for critical review of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (DNR 2014–1743) and by Stockholm County Council. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. Data are available on request from the Steering Committee for the Stockholm Public Health Cohort since participant privacy needs to be obtained as ensured by the responsible research team, and since Swedish law only permits distribution of register based health data only after ethical vetting of proposals from a Swedish research institution. Contact Cecilia Magnusson on behalf of the Steering Committee for the Stockholm Public Health Cohort for details consult http://folkhalsoguiden.se/halsa-stockholm/halsa-stockholm-%2D-for-forskare/.

Authors’ contributions

CD and KK originated the idea and designed the study. KK wrote the manuscript draft. PF and HD conducted the analyses. All authors interpreted the analyses, critically reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants and ethical approval for the study was granted by the Stockholm Regional Ethical Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council
(2)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet
(3)
Division of Psychiatry, University College London

References

  1. Olfson M, Druss BG, Marcus SC. 2015. Trends in mental health care among children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2029–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Olfson M, Blanco C, Wang S, Laje G, Correll CU. National trends in the mental health care of children, adolescents, and adults by office-based physicians. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:81–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kosidou K, Magnusson C, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Hallqvist J, Hellner Gumpert C, Idrizbegovic S, et al. Recent time trends in levels of self-reported anxiety, mental health service use and suicidal behaviour in Stockholm. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010;122:47–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Center for epidemiology and community medicine (CES). Faktablad: Fortsatt ökning av psykiatrisk vårdkonsumtion bland unga i Stockholms län år 2015. (Further increase in psychiatric service use for the young). Faktablad 2016:3, CES, Stockholm, 2016. Available at: http://folkhalsoguiden.se/amnesomraden/psykisk-halsa/informationsmaterial/fortsatt-okning-av-psykiatrisk-vardkonsumtion-bland-unga-i-stockholms-lan-ar-2015/
  5. Sigfusdottir ID, Asgeirsdottir BB, Sigurdsson JF, Gudjonsson GH. Trends in depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and visits to healthcare specialists: a national study among Icelandic adolescents. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36:361–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith RP, Larkin GL, Southwick SM. Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for anxiety-related mental health conditions, 1992-2001. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69:286–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ma J, Lee KV, Stafford RS. Depression treatment during outpatient visits by U.S. children and adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:434–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blader JC. Acute inpatient care for psychiatric disorders in the United States, 1996 through 2007. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:1276–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collishaw S. Annual research review: secular trends in child and adolescent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56:370–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Collishaw S, Maughan B, Natarajan L, Pickles A. Trends in adolescent emotional problems in England: a comparison of two national cohorts twenty years apart. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51:885–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T, editors. (2016) mental health and wellbeing in England: adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital; 2016.Google Scholar
  12. Fichter MM, Xepapadakos F, Quadflieg N, Georgopoulou E, Fthenakis WEA. Comparative study of psychopathology in Greek adolescents in Germany and in Greece in 1980 and 1998--18 years apart. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;254:27–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sweeting H, Young R, West P. GHQ increases among Scottish 15 year olds 1987-2006. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44:579–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baxter AJ, Scott KM, Ferrari AJ, Norman RE, Vos T, Whiteford HA. Challenging the myth of an "epidemic" of common mental disorders: trends in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression between 1990 and 2010. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31:506–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Graaf R, ten Have M, van Gool C, van Dorsselaer S. Prevalence of mental disorders and trends from 1996 to 2009. Results from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence Study-2. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;47:203–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. The PLOS Medicine Editors. The paradox of mental health: over-treatment and under-recognition. PLoS Med 2013;10(5):e1001456.Google Scholar
  17. Rickwood DJ, Deane FP, Wilson CJ. When and how do young people seek professional help for mental health problems? Med J Aust. 2007;187(Suppl 7):S35–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonabi H, Müller M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Eisele J, Rodgers S, Seifritz E, et al. Mental health literacy, attitudes to help seeking, and perceived need as predictors of mental health service use: a longitudinal study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016;204:321–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Meadows GN, Burgess PM. Perceived need for mental health care: findings from the 2007 Australian survey of mental health and wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43:624–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sourander A, Santalahti P, Haavisto A, Piha J, IkAheimo K, Helenius H. Have there been changes in children's psychiatric symptoms and mental health service use? A 10-year comparison from Finland. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43:1134–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sellers R, Maughan B, Pickles A, Thapar A, Collishaw S. Trends in parent- and teacher-rated emotional, conduct and ADHD problems and their impact in prepubertal children in great Britain: 1999-2008. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56:49–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Svensson AC, Fredlund P, Laflamme L, Hallqvist J, Alfredsson L, Ekbom A, et al. Cohort profile: the Stockholm public health cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1263–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27:191–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundin A, Hallgren M, Theobald H, Hellgren C, Torgén M. Validity of the 12-item version of the general health questionnaire in detecting depression in the general population. Public Health. 2016;136:66–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundin A, Åhs J, Åsbring N, Kosidou K, Dal H, Tinghög P, et al. Discriminant validity of the 12-item version of the general health questionnaire in a Swedish case-control study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:171–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobsen BK, Hasvold T, Høyer G, Hansen V. The general health questionnaire: how many items are really necessary in population surveys? Psychol Med. 1995;25:957–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundström S, Särndal CE. Calibration as a standard method for treatment of nonresponse. J Off Stat. 1999;15:305–27.Google Scholar
  28. Rapoport JL, Inoff-Germain G, Weissman MM, Greenwald S, Narrow WE, Jensen PS, et al. Childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder in the NIMH MECA study: parent versus child identification of cases. Methods for the epidemiology of child and adolescent mental disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2000;14:535–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rothen S, Vandeleur CL, Lustenberger Y, Jeanprêtre N, Ayer E, Gamma F, et al. Parent-child agreement and prevalence estimates of diagnoses in childhood: direct interview versus family history method. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18:96–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliver MI, Pearson N, Coe N, Gunnell D. Help-seeking behaviour in men and women with common mental health problems: cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186:297–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zachrisson HD, Rödje K, Mykletun A. Utilization of health services in relation to mental health problems in adolescents: a population based survey. BMC Public Health 2006;16. 6:34.Google Scholar
  32. Hämäläinen J, Isometsä E, Sihvo S, Pirkola S, Kiviruusu O. Use of health services for major depressive and anxiety disorders in Finland. Depress Anxiety. 2008;25:27–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017