Skip to main content

Anxiety symptoms and burnout among Chinese medical staff of intensive care unit: the moderating effect of social support

Abstract

Background

Social support can be a critical resource to help medical staff cope with stressful events; however, the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms has not yet been explored.

Methods

The final sample was comprised of 514 intensive care unit physicians and nurses in this cross-sectional study. Questionnaires were used to collect data. A moderated model was used to test the effect of social support.

Results

The moderating effect of social support was found to be significant (b = − 0.06, p = 0.04, 95%CI [− 0.12, − 0.01]). The Johnson-Neyman technique indicated that when social support scores were above 4.26 among intensive care unit medical staff, burnout was not related to anxiety symptoms.

Conclusions

This is the first study to test the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms among intensive care unit staff.

Peer Review reports

Background

Burnout syndrome is defined as “a psychological syndrome emerging as a prolonged response to chronic interpersonal stressors on the job” [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies burnout as an “occupational phenomenon” in International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (ICD-11) [2]. This syndrome is characterized by three domains: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Burnout is attributed to demanding and highly stressful work environments (e.g., longer work hours, insufficient community support in the workplace, and a heavy workload) [3]. Evidence shows that burnout among medical staff is a public health crisis that requires urgent action [4]. Not only can burnout negatively affect the ability of medical professionals to properly care for their patients, such as medical errors, but it may be detrimental to their mental wellbeing (e.g., anxiety and depression) [4]. A systematic review has shown that one of the most important outcomes is psychological problems for employees suffering burnout and burnout is associated with an increased prevalence of anxiety among male and female employees [5].

Due to the elevated levels of workplace tension, physicians and nurses are consistently subjected to mental health issues, such as anxiety, which is defined as “a psychological state typically correlated with uneasiness, fear, or worry” [6]. The economic burden of anxiety is huge and anxiety is considered to be the sixth leading cause of disability [7, 8]. In China, healthcare professionals are placed under great pressure due to poor working conditions, highly stressful relationships between caregivers and patients, and severe medical staff shortages [9, 10]. This also makes Chinese medical staff vulnerable to developing anxiety symptoms. Studies found that the prevalence of anxiety among medical professionals in China was between 25.67–41.1% [10,11,12]. Poor mental health can have a negative impact on physical health. Evidence shows that mental health problems are responsible for chronic diseases, like cardiovascular disease [13]. Anxiety can also lead to physical symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep problems, and muscle spasms [14]. Medical staff with anxiety have difficulty in concentrating on their clinical practice, resulting in inappropriate medical treatments, thus causing potential gaps in patient care and safety [15].

Social support is defined as “those social interactions or relationships that provide individuals with actual assistance or that embed individuals within a social system believed to provide love, care, or sense of attachment to a valued social group or dyad” [16]. Social support includes both received social support and perceived social support. Received support refers to an individual obtaining actual help from others, whereas perceived support refers to the belief that such helping behaviors will be available when needed [17]. These supports are commonly provided by colleagues, family, and friends [18]. There are many psychological resources that medical professionals can adopt to improve psychological stress and mental health. This study focuses specifically on received and perceived social supports due to their role in protecting against mental health issues [19, 20]. Social support is theorized to impact mental health through two main effects: a direct effect and a buffering effect [18]. The existing empirical literature proposes that social support directly influences the wellbeing of medical staff [21, 22]. Additionally, it is now well supported from a variety of studies that social support has moderating effects. Researchers have found that social support can moderate the effects of stress on mental health [23, 24]. According to Dir et al., (2019) social support has a moderating effect on the relationship between burnout and mental health stigma [25]. The implications of this are that the effects of stressors on mental health can be moderated by the magnitude of social support.

From the empirical evidence, it can be inferred that burnout has a positive relationship with anxiety symptoms. Moreover, social support may moderate the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms. However, the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms has not been explored yet. To fill this gap, this study sought to test the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms among staff working in the intensive care unit (ICU). These highly specialized and well-trained professionals work in an especially stressful care setting, where they are constantly exposed to high patient morbidity and mortality, difficult ethical decision-making, and end-of-life issues [26]. These staff are also expected to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary care to critically ill patients despite limited resources [27]. Consequently, critical care staff have one of the highest rates of burnout (> 50%), and are more likely to develop high levels of anxiety or depression [28, 29].

Theoretical background

According to the Job Demand-Resources Model (JD-R Model), job demands are ‘negative factors’, such as a heavy workload and demanding interactions with clients. In contrast, job resources are ‘positive factors’, such as advanced job skills and enough leisure time [30]. When job demands are chronically high and job resources are limited, burnout can happen [30]. Schaufeli (2017) has proposed an integrative conceptual framework on the basis of the JD-R model [31]. This framework contains two basic processes. The first being the motivational process whereby large amounts of job resources predict work engagement, ultimately leading to positive organizational outcomes, such as organizational commitment. The second process is the stress process, which means that excessive job demands and limited job resources can result in burnout, leading to mental health problems [31]. On the basis of this stress process, anxiety symptoms may be one of the mental health problems occurring in response to burnout. Research has supported the direct effects of burnout on anxiety among Chinese physicians [32]. According to the buffering model of social support, individuals who receive social support are less impaired when they face stressful events [18]. In line with the buffering model of social support, high burnout may be associated with high frequent anxiety symptoms if social support is limited. Therefore, the effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms can be moderated by social support, due to its buffering effects. The moderating effect of social support have been found in the literature [23, 24].

These theories were integrated to investigate the buffering effect of social support on mitigating the stress process of JD-R Model. This means that social support can moderate the relationships between burnout and anxiety symptoms. Figure 1 shows the conceptual model where burnout is the main predictor, social support is the moderator, and anxiety symptoms are the outcome.

Fig. 1
figure1

The conceptual model of this research

Methods

Study units and participants

A convenience sampling method was used to select participants. From November 2018 to March 2019, data collection was done by three trained researchers using anonymous, self-administered questionnaires. ICU nurses and physicians were recruited from Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, the affiliated hospital of Guizhou Medical University, and Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. We contacted all ICU directors and head nurses via email to participate in this study. Once ICU directors or head nurses agreed to the study, they provided the number of physicians and nurses working in their ICU. The researchers explained the aims of the study to ICU medical staff and informed them that the data would be kept confidential. After they made their decisions to participate in this study, the informed consent was obtained. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles set forth in the Helsinki Declaration. Each hospital obtained ethics approval from their respective ethics committee.

Measures

Anxiety symptoms

Anxiety symptoms were measured on a 4-point Likert scale with 20 items from the Chinese version of the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) [33]. Example items include “I feel afraid for no reason at all”, “I feel more nervous and anxious than usual”, and “I feel like I’m falling apart and going to pieces”. An original total score is multiplied by 1.25 to get the standard score. The present study defined anxiety symptoms as a standard score ≥ 50 [34]. A previous study showed that the reliability of SAS was 0.88 [34].

Social support

The Chinese questionnaire of the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) was applied to assess social support in this study [35]; it comprises three dimensions: objective support, subjective support, and the usage of support. Example items include “In the past, when you encounter difficulties, what is the source that you ever received either economic support or practical problem-solving help?”, “How many intimate friends do you have, from whom you can receive support and help?”, and “What is the way of seeking help when you are in trouble?”. Participants were asked to score on 4-point Likert scales. The social support scores range from 12 to 66, indicating that higher scores receive more social support. A Chinese study has also suggested SSRS has acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71) [36].

Burnout

The Chinese Burnout Inventory is designed to screen for burnout; it consists of three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. Example items include “I feel emotionally drained from my work”, “I have become more callous toward people since I took this job”, and “I have accomplished many worthwhile things in this job” [37]. Respondents rated their level of agreement with each item on a scale of 0 to 6. The cut-off values for the three dimensions are > 25, 11, and 16, respectively. According to these dimensions, burnout is defined as being at or above the cut-off score in at least one of the three dimensions. A previous study showed that Cronbach’s alpha was 0.816 among Chinese physicians [32].

Statistical analysis

Pearson correlational analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed for the three variables (anxiety symptoms, social support, and burnout) using IBM® SPSS® Statistics (Version 24, IBM Corporation, New York, NY). After exploratory factor analysis, the mean values of those variables were used to conduct a PROCESS analysis. To show the prevalence of burnout and anxiety symptoms, these variables were regarded as categorical variables. However, in the PROCESS analysis, social support, burnout, and anxiety symptoms were considered to be continuous variables. PROCESS macro was used in this study, and it was based on ordinary least-squares regression [38]. We adopted the model 1 of PROCESS macro to test the significance of the moderated model. The Johnson–Neyman (J-N) technique was applied for probing interactions [39]. The J-N technique can identify regions in the range of the moderator variable where the effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms is statistically significant or not significant.

Results

Preliminary analyses

A total of 615 ICU physicians and nurses from 3 hospitals were invited. Eleven ICU medical staff refused to participate in the study and 604 consented to participate. Five hundred fifty-eight questionnaires were returned, representing a 92.4% response rate. The final sample was comprised of 514 participants, because they completed questionnaires. In total, 56.03% of participants experienced burnout, and 48.25% participants developed anxiety symptoms (Table 1). The descriptive statistics, correlation matrix, Cronbach’s alphas, and average variance extracted (AVE) are shown in Table 2. Acceptable convergent validity was found due to each AVE exceeding 0.50. Because the square root of AVE values for social support (0.74), burnout (0.73), and anxiety (0.85) exceeded the construct correlation values (− 0.26–0.38), the discriminant validity is satisfactory in our study [40].

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of study participants (N = 514)
Table 2 The correlation coefficient, mean, standard deviation, Cronbach’s alphas, and AVE (N = 514)

Moderation analyses

As shown in Table 3, the direct effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms was found to be significant (b = 0.36, p < 0.001, 95%CI [0.21, 0.51]), and the moderating effect of social support was also found to be significant (b = − 0.06, p = 0.04, 95%CI [− 0.12, − 0.01]). The Johnson-Neyman technique indicated that the score of 4.26 on the social support can be regarded as a point of transition between a statistically significant and a nonsignificant effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Moderation analyses
Fig. 2
figure2

Effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms at different levels of social support. ULCI = Upper Limit of Confidence Interval, LLCI = Lower Limit of Confidence Interval; Effect = the effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms. The horizontal line represents the unstandardized effect of zero, and the vertical line represents the transition value of the moderator

Discussion

This study was designed to determine the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms. The results support the hypothesis that social support moderates the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms among ICU staff.

A high level of burnout was directly related to high levels of anxiety symptoms as shown in this study. The findings align with the stress process described in the JD-R model outlining burnout can lead to mental health issues. There is a clear link between burnout and psychological strain (e.g., anxiety). In response to burnout, individuals are likely to suffer from anxiety symptoms, which can be regarded as negative outcomes in the stress process [31]. Studies have also found similar results, including Zhou et al. (2018) who found the same relationships between burnout and anxiety symptoms among Chinese nurses [10]. Furthermore, a systematic review by Bakker et al. (2014) confirmed that one of the most important negative consequences of burnout is psychological problems [5]. ICU staff often need to face the life-and-death struggle in a very demanding profession, so they are more likely to be emotionally and physically drained. Under this situation, burnout can pose a threat to psychological problems. It is vital for policy makers to raise awareness about the problems that the directly negative effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms among ICU professionals.

The findings from this study highlight social support can play a key role in mitigating the detrimental effect of burnout on anxiety symptoms among ICU professionals. It has been previously observed that the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between stress and depression exists among medical staff [41]. Furthermore, social support has a moderating effect on the relationship between burnout and mental health stigma [25]. However, for the first time, the mechanism underlying the association between social support, burnout, and anxiety symptoms in this population was analyzed in this study. The results show that social support can moderate the stress process due to the buffering effects. Social support may play a vital role at two different points in the process linking burnout to anxiety symptoms [18]. First, individuals experiencing burnout may have the perception that others will offer important resources, so this can help individuals redefine the potential for harm posed by burnout. Resources from social networks can enable individuals to have a sense of predictability and stability in their lives, as well as a recognition of self-worth, personal control, and mastery. Therefore, they are less likely to be affected by burnout [18]. Second, social support has the potential to reduce the likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms in the stress process, since support resources can mitigate the impact of burnout by providing problem solving strategies such as material support and intangible resources [18]. These strategies can reduce the intensity of the relationship between burnout and anxiety. Although the moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout and anxiety symptoms was statistically significant, the effect size was quite small limiting practical significance of data. Therefore, the buffering capabilities of social support should not be overestimated.

In this study, 56.03% of participants experienced burnout, which was higher than the findings from a Singapore study (11%) [42]. Additionally, this study suggested that 48.25% of participants experienced anxiety symptoms. In contrast, another Chinese study showed that the prevalence of anxiety symptoms among ICU medical staff was 35.2% [43]. Our study found that the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and burnout are common in ICU. One possible explanation may be that critically ill patients require medical staff to effectively assess, monitor, and respond to their needs by adopting specialized knowledge and advanced skills [44]. Another reason may be that although Chinese ICU medical staff must deal with the demanding workload, they always receive criticism and dissatisfaction about their professional performance. These negative attitudes often result in workplace violence, which may cause mental health issues among medical staff [45].

Implications

According to the “Healthy China 2030” program, institute executives should give top priority to screening and prevent burnout and mental health problems among certain professional groups. Therefore, improving mental wellbeing among ICU professionals should be a matter of utmost concern to healthcare policy makers.

The higher ICU staff assess their social support, the lower is the detrimental impact of burnout on anxiety symptoms. Social support can be regarded as an effective and low-cost way to improve mental health among ICU staff with burnout. Therefore, we suggest that a multifaceted social support program based on the Chinese cultural values should be developed to promote mental health among Chinese ICU medical professionals.

In traditional Chinese culture, family is a core value that can be leveraged to promote social support. ICU physicians and nurses should be encouraged to enhance bonds with family members, so these professionals can gain various support resources through seeking intangible resources (e.g., love, reassurance, and safety) and material resources (e.g., financial support). Additionally, ICU departments can increase greater understanding and support between staff and family members through hosting a “visiting day”. In this way, family members can gain first-hand experience of the workplace environment in the ICU, and better understand the duties of the healthcare professionals on the unit.

Another core value in Chinese culture is “harmony” which means mutual aid [46]. Positive interpersonal relationships with colleagues and supervisors are always encouraged in Chinese traditional culture. Therefore, this harmonious relationship should be promoted and fostered in the workplace, as it can be another important source of social support [47]. ICU professionals should offer each other emotional and practical support in challenging circumstances to prevent anxiety symptoms. For example, in the ICU setting, staff can share resources and problem-solving skills with their colleagues who find it difficult to cope with a critical patient due to limited resources. To facilitate this, ward managers or unit leaders can initiate a wide range of team development training to help ICU physicians and nurses create a culture of harmony in the workplace.

Study limitations

Due to the cross-sectional design of the study, the results should not be interpreted with causal directionality. Although we confirmed the relationships between anxiety symptoms and burnout based on a theory-driven hypothesis and studies show the directionality between anxiety symptoms and burnout [10, 32], we cannot rule out the possibility that anxiety symptoms may predispose an individual for burnout [48]. In some cases, they may play different roles based on different theories. For example, Nauman et al., (2018) found that anxiety was a moderator whereas emotional exhaustion was a mediator [49]. In the future, studies should use a two-wave or three-wave longitudinal design to explore reciprocal relationships between these variables. Second, self-reported questionnaires were adopted in this study, so participant responses may have been influenced by social desirability bias. Third, as the cross-sectional sample was recruited from tertiary hospitals, the findings cannot be generalized in China. Future studies should include other types of hospitals. Lastly, given that there are many potential personal and social resources (e.g., self- efficacy, coping) that could buffer relationships between burnout and anxiety symptoms, we encourage future studies to investigate other moderators in such relationships.

Conclusion

This study identifies the relationships between social support, burnout and anxiety among ICU professionals and provides a better understanding of the factors that may improve their anxiety symptoms. These findings highlight the importance of various forms of social support to help ICU professionals with burnout avoid suffering anxiety symptoms.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SAS:

Self-Rating Anxiety scale

ULCI:

Upper Limit of Confidence Interval

LLCI:

Lower Limit of Confidence Interval

AVE:

Average variance extracted

DV:

Dependent variable

IV:

Independent variable

References

  1. 1.

    Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organisation, 2019. Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: international classification of Diseases. https://wwwwhoint/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/ Accessed 10 Feb 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jha AK, Iliff A, Chaoui AA, Defossez S, Bombaugh M, Miller Y. A crisis in health care: a call to action on physician burnout. Waltham: Massachusetts Medical Society MHaHA, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Global Health Institute; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. Burnout and work engagement: the JD–R approach. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    American Psychological Association. https://wwwapaorg/topics/anxiety/. Accessed 30 July 2019.

  7. 7.

    Baxter A, Vos T, Scott K, Ferrari A, Whiteford H. The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychol Med. 2014;44(11):2363–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kessler RC, Greenberg PE. The economic burden of anxiety and stress disorders. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;67:982–92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tang N, Thomson LE. Workplace violence in Chinese hospitals: the effects of healthcare disturbance on the psychological well-being of Chinese healthcare workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3687.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhou J, Yang Y, Qiu X, Yang X, Pan H, Ban B, Qiao Z, Wang L, Wang W. Serial multiple mediation of organizational commitment and job burnout in the relationship between psychological capital and anxiety in Chinese female nurses: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018:75–82.

  11. 11.

    Gao YQ, Pan BC, Sun W, Wu H, Wang JN, Wang L. Anxiety symptoms among Chinese nurses and the associated factors: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang H, Qing X, Li L, et al. Depression and Anxiety in Healthcare Staffs in A Tertiary University Hospital in Luoyang, Henan Province: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study[J]. BioRxiv. 2019:516153. [Preprint]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/516153.

  13. 13.

    Rioli G, Tassi S, Mattei G, Ferrari S, Galeazzi GM, Mancini S, Alboni S, Roncucci L. The association between symptoms of anxiety, depression, and cardiovascular risk factors: results from an Italian cross-sectional study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019;207(5):340–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    National Institute of Mental Health. http://wwwnimhnihgov/health/topics/anxiety-disorders/indexshtml, Accessed 30 July 2019.

  15. 15.

    Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Burdick E, Katz JT, Lilly CM, Stone PH, Lockley SW, Bates DW. Effect of reducing interns' work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(18):1838–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hobfoll S. The ecology of stress. Washington DC: Hemisphere; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Barrera M Jr. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. Am J Community Psychol. 1986;14(4):413–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shang F, Kaniasty K, Cowlishaw S, Wade D, Ma H, Forbes D. The Impact of Received Social Support on Posttraumatic Growth After Disaster: The Importance of Both Support Quantity and Quality. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000541.

  20. 20.

    Wilson JM, Weiss A, Shook N. Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savoring: factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being. Person Individ Diff. 2020;152:109568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Barnett MD, Martin KJ, Garza CJ. Satisfaction with work–family balance mediates the relationship between workplace social support and depression among hospice nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019;51(2):187–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Berthelsen M, Pallesen S, Mageroy N, Tyssen R, Bjorvatn B, Moen BE, Knardahl S. Effects of psychological and social factors in shiftwork on symptoms of anxiety and depression in nurses: a 1-year follow-up. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(10):1127–37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Escalera C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Nápoles AM. Social support as a moderator in the relationship between intrusive thoughts and anxiety among Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2019;28(9):1819–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee J-S, Koeske GF, Sales E. Social support buffering of acculturative stress: a study of mental health symptoms among Korean international students. Int J Intercult Relat. 2004;28(5):399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dir AL, Saldana L, Chapman JE, Aalsma MC. Burnout and mental health stigma among juvenile probation officers: the moderating effect of participatory atmosphere. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(2):167–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Van Mol MM, Kompanje EJ, Benoit DD, Bakker J, Nijkamp MD. The prevalence of compassion fatigue and burnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136955.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jasper S, Stephan M, Al-Khalaf H, Rennekampff H-O, Vogt PM, Mirastschijski U. Too little appreciation for great expenditure? Workload and resources in ICUs. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(7):753–61.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Garrouste-Orgeas M, Perrin M, Soufir L, Vesin A, Blot F, Maxime V, Beuret P, Troché G, Klouche K, Argaud L, et al. The Iatroref study: medical errors are associated with symptoms of depression in ICU staff but not burnout or safety culture. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(2):273–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Moss M, Good VS, Gozal D, Kleinpell R, Sessler CN. An official critical care societies collaborative statement-burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals: a call for action. Chest. 2016;150(1):17–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resource model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499–512.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schaufeli W. The job demands-resources model: a ‘how to’guide to increase work engagement and prevent burnout. Organ Dyn. 2017;46:120–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhou J, Yang Y, Qiu X, Yang X, Pan H, Ban B, Qiao Z, Wang L, Wang W. Relationship between anxiety and burnout among Chinese physicians: a moderated mediation model. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0157013.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gong Y, Han T, Chen W, Dib HH, Yang G, Zhuang R, Chen Y, Tong X, Yin X, Lu Z. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and related risk factors among physicians in China: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103242.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Xiao S. The theoretical basis and application of social support questionnaire. J Clin Psychol Med. 1994;4:98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lau Y, Wong DFK, Wang Y, Kwong DHK, Wang Y. The roles of social support in helping Chinese women with antenatal depressive and anxiety symptoms cope with perceived stress. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014;28(5):305–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li Y, Wu M: Developing the job burnout inventory psychological science. 2005;28(2):454–457.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hayes AF, Rockwood NJ. Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behav Res Ther. 2016;98:39.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hayes AF, Montoya AK. A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing an interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Commun Methods Measures. 2016;11(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. International Edition. 5th ed. Delhi: Pearson Education; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lin HS, Probst JC, Hsu YC. Depression among female psychiatric nurses in southern Taiwan: main and moderating effects of job stress, coping behaviour and social support. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(15–16):2342–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ong YZ, Siddiqui S, John S, Chen Z, Chang S. The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in intensive care unit staff and the common coping strategies used. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2016;45(5):215–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lu F, Xu Y, Yu Y, Li P, Wu T, Wang T, Xie J, Liu B, Xu S, Li M. Moderating effect of mindfulness on the relationships between perceived stress and mental health outcomes among Chinese intensive care nurses. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    El Khamali R, Mouaci A, Valera S, Cano-Chervel M, Pinglis C, Sanz C, Allal A, Attard V, Malardier J, Delfino M, et al. Effects of a multimodal program including simulation on job strain among nurses working in intensive care units: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(19):1988–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Fang H, Zhao X, Yang H, Sun P, Li Y, Jiang K, Li P, Jiao M, Liu M, Hong Q. Depressive symptoms and workplace-violence-related risk factors among otorhinolaryngology nurses and physicians in northern China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e019514.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hao S. Harmonious world: the conceived international order in framework of China’s foreign affairs. Foreign Affairs. 2008;87(1):29–55.

  47. 47.

    Willemse BM, Jonge JD, Smit D, Depla MFIA, Pot AM. The moderating role of decision authority and coworker- and supervisor support on the impact of job demands in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(7):822–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lesener T, Gusy B, Wolter C. The job demands-resources model: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress. 2019;33(1):76–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nauman S, Fatima T, Haq IU. Does despotic leadership harm employee family life: exploring the effects of emotional exhaustion and anxiety. Front Psychol. 2018;9:601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am particularly grateful for the assistance given by Liangyuan Li, Qi Zhang, Weifang Li, Yunping Bi, and Ni Luo.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HZ and ZHY designed the study, analyzed the data, and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. LWT, CXD, JS, DDC, GJQ and XYW helped collect and manage data. SYM participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. PZ and HZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ZhiHong Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (20181129–2); The affiliated hospital of Guizhou Medical University (2019001-K); Guizhou provincial people’s hospital ([2019]-32). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Ye, Z., Tang, L. et al. Anxiety symptoms and burnout among Chinese medical staff of intensive care unit: the moderating effect of social support. BMC Psychiatry 20, 197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02603-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Social support
  • Burnout
  • Intensive care unit
  • Moderating effects