Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction to: Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders

BMC Psychiatry volume 20, Article number: 364 (2020) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 05 June 2020

Correction to: BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:280

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6

Following the publication of the original article [1], multiple errors were identified in the Results Text of the Abstract and the Diagnostic agreement for DSM-5 disorder categories section.

The text has been changed to correspond to the correct results reported in Table 4 and are highlighted in bold typeface.

Abstract - Results:

Kappa values ranged from 0.90 for post-traumatic stress disorder to 0.29 for social anxiety disorder.

Main text - Diagnostic agreement for DSM-5 disorder categories:

The highest JI, 1.00, was found for anorexia nervosa, second highest JI (0.91) was found for ‘any’ DSM-5 disorder. PTSD had a JI of 0.83.

The category of any anxiety disorder (without panic attack) revealed lowest RJI with 0.69, followed by social anxiety disorder with an RJI of 0.79; the RJI for any anxiety disorder (without social anxiety disorder) was 0.76.

Most Cohen’s kappa values ranged between 0.70 – 0.85, with anorexia nervosa displaying the highest kappa (1.00), followed by PTSD (0.90) and cannabis use disorder (0.88). The diagnosis of ‘any’ DSM-5 disorder had a kappa of 0.85.

Reference

  1. Hoyer J, et al. Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Jana Hoyer, Catharina Voss, Jens Strehle, John Venz, Lars Pieper & Katja Beesdo-Baum

  2. Behavioral Epidemiology, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Jana Hoyer, Catharina Voss, John Venz, Lars Pieper & Katja Beesdo-Baum

  3. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Jens Strehle, John Venz, Lars Pieper & Katja Beesdo-Baum

  4. Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

    Hans-Ulrich Wittchen

  5. Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Stefan Ehrlich

  6. Eating Disorders Research and Treatment Center, Deartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Stefan Ehrlich

Authors
  1. Jana Hoyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catharina Voss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Strehle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Venz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lars Pieper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan Ehrlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Katja Beesdo-Baum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Beesdo-Baum.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoyer, J., Voss, C., Strehle, J. et al. Correction to: Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders. BMC Psychiatry 20, 364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02762-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02762-2

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us