Skip to main content
Download PDF

Latent class analysis of depression and anxiety among medical students during COVID-19 epidemic

BMC Psychiatry volume 21, Article number: 498 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global public health emergency that has caused worldwide concern. The mental health of medical students under the COVID-19 epidemic has attracted much attention. This study aims to identify subgroups of medical students based on depression and anxiety and explore the influencing factors during the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

Methods

A total of 29,663 medical students were recruited during the epidemic of COVID-19 in China. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD7) respectively. Latent class analysis was performed based on depression and anxiety symptoms in medical students. The latent class subtypes were compared using the chi-square test. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between identified classes and related factors.

Results

In this study, three distinct subgroups were identified, namely, the poor mental health group, the mild mental health group and the low symptoms group. The number of medical students in each class is 4325, 9321 and 16,017 respectively. The multinomial logistic regression results showed that compared with the low symptoms group, the factors influencing depression and anxiety in the poor mental health group and mild mental health group were sex, educational level, drinking, individual psychiatric disorders, family psychiatric disorders, knowledge of COVID-19, fear of being infected, and participate in mental health education on COVID-19.

Conclusions

Our findings suggested that latent class analysis can be used to categorize different medical students according to their depression and anxiety symptoms during the outbreak of COVID-19. The main factors influencing the poor mental health group and the mild mental health group are basic demographic characteristics, disease history, COVID-19 related factors and behavioural lifestyle. School administrative departments can carry out targeted psychological counseling according to different subgroups to promote the physical and mental health of medical students.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) outbreak has persisted in Wuhan. The World Health Organization declared that the COVID-19 outbreak constitutes a public health emergency of international concern [1]. The outbreak of the COVID-19 has caused public panic and psychological pressure [2, 3]. In January 2020, the Ministry of Education issued a notice requiring colleges to appropriately postpone school opening time. To prevent the escalation of the epidemic, schools have taken measures such as extending holidays to ensure that the majority of students are isolated in their current residences and complete their school-related responsibilities remotely [4]. For college students, extended holidays, long-term stays at home, fewer trips out of the home, and an inability to attend school and participate in social activities, may affect their academic performance and lead to their anxiety and depression [5,6,7].

In a recent study, the research team identified social networking as the strongest protective factor against depression and suggested that reducing sedentary activities, such as watching TV and daytime naps, could also help reduce the risk of depression [8]. This epidemic not only led to a risk of death from infection, but also led to unbearable psychological pressure. College students must reduce the frequency of their outings, resulting in their inability to participate in social activities, which may affect their learning progress and exacerbate their anxiety and depression. Therefore, the mental health status of medical students is of great concern to medical universities [9].

As a special group of future medical workers, medical students’ physical and mental development is not yet fully mature, and the healthy growth of these students can effectively promote the positive development of healthcare in the future [10]. Compared with their normal way of living and learning, staying at home was a major contrast. In fact, the epidemic has affected mental health among those in the medical industry than among those in the general public, and they must be treated correctly to adapt to this change [11]. Mental health problems may continue into adulthood if they are not detected or properly treated. For students in clinically related disciplines, these problems can lead to many undesirable personal and professional consequences [12, 13]. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the mental health of medical students during the epidemic period and take targeted action to intervene with students with different characteristics.

In research on the mental health of medical students, the indirect measurement of the latent mental health can be obtained through observed and measurable behaviour. Previous studies generally used the total scores of the self-assessment scales as the standard for categorizing the mental health of medical students [14, 15]. The categorization standard was too simple to distinguish group characteristics. The application of latent class analysis (LCA) technology can solve this problem and provide more scientific methods for the classification of medical students’ mental health during epidemic. LCA is a more scientific and rigorous statistical method to classify the potential characteristics of a population based on the score probability of each item [16]. Using LCA to group depression and anxiety symptoms of medical students, considering both symptom profile and severity, is helpful to explore the potential mechanism of depression and anxiety, and to develop more targeted intervention measures.

At present, LCA has been widely used in sociology, psychology and disease classification or diagnosis [17, 18]. Current research on COVID-19 has focused on pathogenesis, epidemiology and clinical research [19,20,21,22]. There is no latent category research on mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic. Therefore, this study intends to use LCA to explore the factors influencing medical students’ mental health during the COVID-19 to provide accurate decision-making references for relevant education departments.

Methods

Participants

Participants in our study came from a large cross-sectional survey conducted from March to April 2020 during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. The survey selected three medical universities, and a cluster stratified random sampling method was used. Participants will be included if they are willing to participate and can complete the questionnaire on their own. Considering the severity of the COVID-19 epidemic, we collect questionnaires through the online platform rather than face-to-face interviews. Questionnaires were sent to medical students through the platform of WeChat official account in medical colleges. All the participants were informed of the purpose of this study and signed online informed consent before completing the online questionnaire. The complete questionnaires will be kept confidential and checked for mistakes and completeness through the platform. Ultimately, a total of 29,663 valid questionnaires were collected. This study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Xinxiang Medical University (XYLL-2020235) and Hainan Medical University (HYLL-2020005), complying with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Measures

The survey consists of five parts: basic demographic characteristics, the psychiatric history of individuals and family members, depression, anxiety, and COVID-19 related factors. Depression and anxiety are the most common mental health problems found in Chinese medical students. We focused on symptoms of depression and anxiety for all students using the Chinese versions of the following measurement tools, which have good validity and reliability.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) included 9 items and was adopted to screen for depressive symptoms in our study. Each item was scored from 0 to 3 (0, not at all; 1, several days; 2, more than half of all the days; 3, nearly every day), with the total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicated greater severity of depressive symptoms [23]. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale was a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire that comprised seven items based on seven core symptoms. The participants reported their symptoms using a 4-item rating scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (almost every day), such that the total score ranged from 0 to 21 [24]. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 items were recoded into binary variables for the LCA.

Statistical analysis

LCA models were conducted to identify data-driven subgroups using Version 8.2 of Mplus. The LCA can compensate for the deficiencies of factor analysis and structural equation model, which can only be analyzed with the continuous latent variables [25]. In LCA, classes are identified based on a set of categorical indicators, assuming that the latent categorical variable can explain the association among a set of observed variables [26]. In our study, we fitted one to six latent class models to determine the optimal number of latent classes.

The model fit indices used for the LCA included information criteria, the Lo–Mendell–Rubin (LMR) test, the bootstrap likelihood ratio test (BLRT), and the entropy [27]. In addition, subgroup membership interpretability is another important factor in determining the optimal model. The information criteria include the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the adjusted Bayesian information criterion (aBIC). For these fit indices, the suitable model was based on the highest entropy and the lowest AIC and BIC. The entropy is an indicator of classification accuracy, with values close to 1 indicating greater accuracy [28]. Lower AIC and BIC values indicate that the model provides a better description of the data. The LMR and BLRT are significant tests that compare model fit improvement between models with κ classes and κ-1 classes. Compared to κ-1 classes, significant P values suggest a better model fit with κ classes.

After the appropriate number of latent classes was identified, the medical students were assigned to their most likely subgroup based on their highest posterior class probability. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the distribution of related factors. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to estimate the correlates of related risk factors with subtypes. Statistical significance was taken as a 2-sided P < 0.05.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 29,663 medical students were investigated, including 10,185 males and 19,478 females. The average age of the medical students was 21.46 years (SD = 2.50). The demographic characteristics of medical students are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of medical students
Full size table

Model fit indices of LCA

Model fit indices for various models with different latent classes are listed in Table 2. LCA with 1 to 6 classes was performed. The results showed that the AIC, BIC and aBIC decreased with an increasing classification number. The model with 1 class had the largest AIC, BIC and aBIC, suggesting that this model fit the data the worst among the models. The 2-class model had the highest entropy value, but the LMR test was not significant. AIC, BIC and aBIC leveled off slightly after the 3-class model was assigned. Additionally, entropy values close to 1 are preferred, indicating better class separation [28]. In the 3-class and 4-class models, the LMR and BLRT values reached significance (P < 0.0001), but the entropy value of the 3-class model was higher, indicating that the 3-class model fit the data better than the 4-class model did. After comprehensively considering the above indicators, we selected the 3-class model because it was parsimonious and exhibited better class separation than did the solutions generated by the other classifications (Table 2).

Table 2 Fitness indicators of different latent class models
Full size table

Definition of latent class

The score probability of the first class was high, which showed that the medical students in this category had poor mental health status during the epidemic period and could not be effectively adjusted, so they were labeled the ‘poor mental health group’. This group had the smallest number of medical students (N = 4325; 14.58%). The second class (N = 9321; 31.42%) was defined as the ‘mild mental health group’ because it had a moderate score probability of depression and anxiety, which was lower than that observed in the first class and higher than that observed in the third class. Medical students of this type had a certain self-regulation ability during the epidemic. The third class (N = 16,017; 54.00%) had a low probability of scoring in all categories, indicating that this type of medical students had better mental health status during the epidemic and could effectively regulate their psychological condition, so it was named the ‘low symptoms group’.

Figure 1 illustrates the profiles of mental health subtypes for the 3-class model. In Fig. 1, the y-axis represents the probability of depression and anxiety symptoms, while the x-axis shows indicator variables used for the LCA. The three lines showed symptom patterns for the three mental health subtypes. No crossing was observed among the three lines, suggesting that the modelled subtypes differed in symptom profiles. In particular, for the item regarding suicide or self-harm, a lower probability was shown across the three groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Profiles of latent classes of depression and anxiety in medical students

Full size image

Univariate analysis of latent class of mental health

As shown in Table 3, gender, education level, smoking, drinking, the psychiatric disorders of the individual and family members, knowledge of COVID-19, contact with confirmed or suspected patients with COVID-19, fear of being infected, and participation in mental health education on COVID-19 were significantly different across the three groups (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Univariate analysis of different latent classes of mental health status
Full size table

Multinomial logistic regression analysis of latent classes of mental health

The category classification was used as the dependent variable, the third class (low symptoms group) was used as the reference group, and the significant factors in univariate analysis were used as independent variables for multinomial logistic regression analysis. The results showed that compared with the low symptoms group, medical students in the poor mental health group were more likely to be female (OR = 1.732, P < 0.001), have a postgraduate degree or above (OR = 1.740, P < 0.001), drink (OR = 2.274, P < 0.001), have individual psychiatric disorders (OR = 1.898, P = 0.001), have family psychiatric disorders (OR = 5.030, P < 0.001), have a lack of knowledge about COVID-19 (OR = 1.615, P < 0.001), have a fear of being infected (OR = 3.223, P < 0.001), and be unwilling to participate in mental health education on COVID-19 (OR = 1.397, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, those in the mild mental health group were more likely to be female (OR = 1.534, P < 0.001), have a postgraduate degree or above (OR = 1.348, P = 0.004), drink (OR = 1.869, P < 0.001), have psychiatric disorders of the individual (OR = 1.708, P < 0.001), have psychiatric disorders of the family (OR = 2.861, P < 0.001), have a lack of knowledge about COVID-19 (OR = 1.503, P < 0.001), have a fear of being infected (OR = 1.982, P < 0.001), and be unwilling to participate in mental health education on COVID-19 (OR = 1.284, P < 0.001) than were those in the low symptoms group (Table 4).

Table 4 Multinomial logistic regression analysis of different latent classes of mental health status
Full size table

Discussion

In the current study, LCA was used to classify medical students’ depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 epidemic. LCA is an important research method in social science that assumes that individuals can be grouped into classes with similar patterns of some behaviours according to their response to a set of observed indicators [29]. Three interpretable subtypes of depression and anxiety based on LCA models were detected in the present analysis, and the entropy of the 3-class model (0.88) indicated excellent membership classification. This is consistent with previous reports involving LCA, which classified child mental health at the population level and determined the reliability of identified classes [30,31,32]. Meanwhile, a number of researchers have published papers encouraging the use of LCA in the classification of mental health issues because it is well suited to addressing pertinent questions [33,34,35,36]. For example, Essau CA encouraged the application of LCA for studying complex multidimensional phenomena, such as mental disorders, because multiple aspects of individual functioning can be studied holistically [37]. Other researchers have suggested that LCA is an important analytic tool for studying health risk behaviours in college students [38,39,40,41,42]. Furthermore, it can also be used to examine the clustering of modifiable health risk behaviours and to explore the relationship between these identified clusters and mental health outcomes [43].

This study found that the mental health of medical students had obvious grouping characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the statistical indicators supported three latent classifications, namely, the ‘low symptoms group’, the ‘mild mental health group’ and the ‘poor mental health group’. Most medical students in this study belonged to the ‘low symptoms group’, and they had low probability scores for each factor of depression and anxiety, which showed that most medical students had strong psychological adjustment ability and adaptability in isolation at home during the epidemic period. Through the probability score plot, it can be seen that all the medical students had a lower probability of scoring on suicidal ideation. It is possible that the students were in a sensitive period of youth and had more or fewer psychological problems, but they did not have ideas of self-harm or suicide.

In the poor mental health group, the probability score plot showed that the mental health problems of medical students occur in clusters rather than independently. The poor mental health group had a higher probability of scoring on all other factors except suicidal ideation, which can partly be attributed to the stressful training experience [44], such as the long length of schooling, academic pressure, and the stress of clinical practice [45]. This subtype of students may have multidimensional psychological problems, with long-term consequences on well-being and professional relationships. This is in accordance with previous studies showing that most of the students with depression symptoms were also diagnosed with generalized anxiety symptoms [46, 47]. The cause of co-existence was related to sharing the same risk factors and symptoms [48,49,50]. The symptoms of depression and anxiety in medical students may include slowness of thought, decreased energy, low self-worth, disturbed sleep, and difficulty concentrating, which have been known to jeopardize academic development [51, 52]. To prevent their behaviour from becoming extreme, these students urgently need corresponding psychological treatment measures and should be the focus of prevention and treatment. Computer-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (CCBT), which has become widely used for the growth of the internet and smartphones, can be considered [53, 54].

Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that compared with the ‘low symptoms group’, there were more females in the ‘poor mental health group’ and the ‘mild mental health group’. In particular, the risk of female students entering the ‘poor mental health group’ was 1.732 times higher than that of male students, indicating that the mental health problems of female students were more prominent, which may be due to the different hormones and stressor events. Consistent with previous studies, gender differences have always existed in the mental health of medical students [55,56,57]. In an investigation of the effects of different educational levels, it is found that the higher one’s educational level is, the higher the risk of entering the ‘poor mental health group’ and ‘mild mental health group’. Medical students with many years of education are more likely to have psychological problems, which may be related to the higher pressure from scientific research and work [58]. Similarly, medical students with drinking habits also have a higher risk of psychological problems, which was in accordance with the findings of previous studies [59, 60]. Compared with the low symptoms group, medical students in the high-risk group with individual or family psychiatric disorders had a higher risk of mental health problems than did students without psychiatric disorders. A history of psychiatric disorders was consistently found to be significant correlate of depression and anxiety [61, 62].

Apart from traditional factors, epidemic-related factors were also observed in our study. Compared with the low symptoms group, the higher the awareness of COVID-19, the lower the risk of psychological problems for medical students in the poor mental health group and mild mental health group. This phenomenon elucidated that the better understanding of preventive measures about COVID-19 for medical students, the more active they are in coping with the epidemic situation. Therefore, improving medical students’ cognition of COVID-19 is beneficial to their mental health. Government departments and universities should make use of social platforms, social software and other new media to attract medical students to consciously receive health education on epidemic prevention measures and related knowledge in COVID-19. Similarly, compared to the low symptoms group, the risk of mental health problems in the poor mental health group with fear of being infected with COVID-19 was three times higher than that in students without this fear. These results indicated that the outbreak of COVID-19 might have a significant effect on the risk of mental health in medical students. This was consistent with previous studies conducted in Guangzhou, which suggested that psychological consequences of the COVID-19 could be serious in college students [63]. Under the stress of the COVID-19 epidemic, the mental health status of medical students had clustering characteristics. It is urgent to implement targeted psychological interventions and health education measures according to the latent group.

Nevertheless, the present study had several potential limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study, thereby precluding conclusions on causality and weakening the dynamic analysis of mental health problems in medical students. Second, the instruments measuring the mental health used in our study were all conducted using self-rating scales, which may influence the accuracy of the results. Third, the medical students’ mental health problems included not only depression and anxiety, but also other psychological problems that were not taken into consideration in our study. This may lead to underestimation of medical students’ psychological problems.

In conclusion, this is the first study using LCA to explore mental health subgroups of medical students during the COVID-19 epidemic. LCA is a useful tool for studying and classifying mental health at the population level. It was found that the mental health status of medical students had clustering characteristics. The results will be highly relevant to medical education and could be a very important reminder of the current mental health status of medical students.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Jee Y. WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee for the COVID-19 outbreak. Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020013. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannan S, Shaik Syed Ali P, Sheeza A, Hemalatha K. COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus 2019) - recent trends. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(4):2006–11. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202002_20378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madabhavi I, Sarkar M, Kadakol N. COVID-19: a review. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2020;90(2):248–58. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2020.1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima IAAS, Nunes JVAO, Saraiva JS, de Souza RI, et al. The emotional impact of coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Talevi D, Socci V, Carai M, Carnaghi G, Faleri S, Trebbi E, et al. Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Riv Psichiatr. 2020;55(3):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1708/3382.33569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi KW, Stein MB, Nishimi KM, Ge T, Coleman JRI, Chen CY, et al. An exposure-wide and Mendelian randomization approach to identifying modifiable factors for the prevention of depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177(10):944–54. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Awad F, Awad M, Mattick K, Dieppe P. Mental health in medical students: time to act. Clin Teach. 2019;16(4):312–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mullan F, Chen C, Petterson S, Kolsky G, Spagnola M. The social mission of medical education: ranking the schools. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(12):804–11. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-12-201006150-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duan L, Zhu G. Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(4):300–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lins L, Carvalho FM, Menezes MS, Porto-Silva L, Damasceno H. Health-related quality of life of students from a private medical school in Brazil. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:149–54. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.563a.5dec.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyrbye LN, Harper W, Moutier C, Durning SJ, Power DV, Massie FS, et al. A multi-institutional study exploring the impact of positive mental health on medical students' professionalism in an era of high burnout. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):1024–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825cfa35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng W, Chen R, Wang X, Zhang Q, Deng W. Prevalence of mental health problems among medical students in China: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(18):e15337. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hope V, Henderson M. Medical student depression, anxiety and distress outside North America: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2014;48(10):963–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muthén B, Muthén LK. Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24(6):882–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kongsted A, Nielsen AM. Latent class analysis in health research. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):55–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Zhang Y, Tian L, Sun B, Chang Q, Zhao Y. Application of latent class analysis in assessing the competency of physicians in China. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1039-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ge H, Wang X, Yuan X, Xiao G, Wang C, Deng T, et al. The epidemiology and clinical information about COVID-19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(6):1011–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03874-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, Lee S, Kim HS, Myoung J, et al. Current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;30(3):313–24. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhai P, Ding Y, Wu X, Long J, Zhong Y, Li Y. The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(5):105955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Du N, Yu K, Ye Y, Chen S. Validity study of patient health Questionnaire-9 items for internet screening in depression among Chinese university students. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2017;9(3):10.1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tong X, An D, McGonigal A, Park SP, Zhou D. Validation of the generalized anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among Chinese people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016;120:31–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanza ST. Latent class analysis for developmental research. Child Dev Perspect. 2016;10(1):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuhaus V, Ring DC. Latent class analysis. J Hand Surg AM. 2013;38(5):1018–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling Multidiscip J. 2007;14(4):535–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Celeux G, Soromenho G. An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J Classif. 1996;13(2):195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent class models for classification. Computational Stats and Data Analysis. 2003;41(3–4):531–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00179-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Petersen KJ, Qualter P, Humphrey N. The application of latent class analysis for investigating population child mental health: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. McElroy E, Shevlin M, Murphy J. Internalizing and externalizing disorders in childhood and adolescence: a latent transition analysis using ALSPAC data. Compr Psychiatry. 2017;75:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rose T, Lindsey MA, Xiao Y, Finigan-Carr NM, Joe S. Mental health and educational experiences among black youth: a latent class analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(11):2321–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0723-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Au JS, Martinez de Andino A, Mekawi Y, Silverstein MW, Lamis DA. Latent class analysis of bipolar disorder symptoms and suicidal ideation and behaviors. Bipolar Disord. 2020;00(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Podlogar MC, Rogers ML, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Chiurliza B, Joiner TE. Anxiety, depression, and the suicidal spectrum: a latent class analysis of overlapping and distinctive features. Cogn Emot. 2018;32(7):1464–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1303452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liao L, Wu Z, Mellor D, Peng D, Zhang C, Xu J, et al. Subtypes of treatment-resistant depression determined by a latent class analysis in a Chinese clinical population. J Affect Disord. 2019;249:82–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahman AF, Manatunga A, Guo Y, Peng L, Warnock M, Ressler KJ, et al. A latent class analysis of PTSD symptoms among inner city primary care patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;98:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Essau CA, de la Torre-Luque A. Comorbidity profile of mental disorders among adolescents: a latent class analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2019;278:228–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Evans-Polce R, Lanza S, Maggs J. Heterogeneity of alcohol, tobacco, and other substance use behaviors in U.S. college students: a latent class analysis. Addict Behav. 2016;53:80–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Göbel K, Scheithauer H, Bräker AB, Jonkman H, Soellner R. Substance use patterns among adolescents in Europe: a latent class analysis. Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(9):1130–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2016.1160120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Assanangkornchai S, Li J, McNeil E, Saingam D. Clusters of alcohol and drug use and other health-risk behaviors among Thai secondary school students: a latent class analysis. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6205-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jeon S, Lee J, Anthony JC, Chung H. Latent class analysis for multiple discrete latent variables: a study on the association between violent behavior drug-using behaviors. Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(6):911–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1340844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Nelon JL, De Pedro KT, Gilreath TD, Patterson MS, Holden CB, Esquivel CH. A latent class analysis of the co-occurrence of sexual violence, substance use, and mental health in youth. Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(12):1938–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1618337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kwan MY, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Duku E, Faulkner G. Patterns of multiple health risk-behaviours in university students and their association with mental health: application of latent class analysis. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016;36(8):163–70. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.36.8.03.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bond AR, Mason HF, Lemaster CM, Shaw SE, Mullin CS, Holick EA, et al. Embodied health: the effects of a mind-body course for medical students. Med Educ Online. 2013;18(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.20699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fawzy M, Hamed SA. Prevalence of psychological stress, depression and anxiety among medical students in Egypt. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:186–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mao Y, Zhang N, Liu J, Zhu B, He R, Wang X. A systematic review of depression and anxiety in medical students in China. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1744-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lun KW, Chan CK, Ip PK, Ma SY, Tsai WW, Wong CS, et al. Depression and anxiety among university students in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2018;24(5):466–72. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj176915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mahroon ZA, Borgan SM, Kamel C, Maddison W, Royston M, Donnellan C. Factors associated with depression and anxiety symptoms among medical students in Bahrain. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0733-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Blanco C, Rubio J, Wall M, Wang S, Jiu CJ, Kendler KS. Risk factors for anxiety disorders: common and specific effects in a national sample. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(9):756–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bore M, Kelly B, Nair B. Potential predictors of psychological distress and well-being in medical students: a cross-sectional pilot study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;7:125–35. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S96802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bassols AM, Okabayashi LS, Silva AB, Carneiro BB, Feijó F, Guimarães GC, et al. First- and last-year medical students: is there a difference in the prevalence and intensity of anxiety and depressive symptoms? Braz J Psychiatry. 2014;36(3):233–40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Moreira de Sousa J, Moreira CA, Telles-Correia D. Anxiety, Depression and Academic Performance: A Study Amongst Portuguese Medical Students Versus Non-Medical Students. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(9):454–62. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.9996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rollman BL, Herbeck Belnap B, Abebe KZ, Spring MB, Rotondi AJ, Rothenberger SD, et al. Effectiveness of online collaborative Care for Treating Mood and Anxiety Disorders in primary care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(1):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thase ME, Wright JH, Eells TD, Barrett MS, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani GK, et al. Improving the efficiency of psychotherapy for depression: computer-assisted versus standard CBT. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(3):242–50. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Amr M, Hady El Gilany A, El-Hawary A. Does gender predict medical students’ stress in mansoura, egypt? Med Educ Online. 2008;13:12. https://doi.org/10.3885/meo.2008.Res00273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kunwar D, Risal A, Koirala S. Study of depression, anxiety and stress among the medical students in two medical colleges of Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2016;14(53):22–6. 27892436.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Brenneisen Mayer F, Souza Santos I, Silveira PS, Itaqui Lopes MH, de Souza AR, Campos EP, et al. Factors associated to depression and anxiety in medical students: a multicenter study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):282. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0791-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Azad N, Shahid A, Abbas N, Shaheen A, Munir N. Anxiety and depression in medical students of a private medical college. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(1):123–7. 28712190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Huang R, Ho SY, Wang MP, Lo WS, Lam TH. Reported alcohol drinking and mental health problems in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;164:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Goodin A, Elswick A, Fallin-Bennett A. Mental health disparities and high-risk alcohol use among non-heterosexual high school students. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2019;55(4):570–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Käkelä J, Nordström T, Haapea M, Jääskeläinen E, Miettunen J. Association between family history of mental disorders and outcome in psychotic disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2018;270:616–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Torres C, Otero P, Bustamante B, Blanco V, Díaz O, Vázquez FL. Mental health problems and related factors in Ecuadorian college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050530.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang ZH, Yang HL, Yang YQ, Liu D, Li ZH, Zhang XR, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptom, and the demands for psychological knowledge and interventions in college students during COVID-19 epidemic: a large cross-sectional study. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:188–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants who took part in this study. The support to recruitment by personnel in Xinxiang Medical University and Hainan Medical University is acknowledged.

Funding

Supported by National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81725005 to Fei Wang), Liaoning Education Foundation (Pandeng Scholar to Fei Wang), Innovation Team Support Plan of Higher Education of Liaoning Province (LT2017007 to Fei Wang), Major Special Construction Plan of China Medical University (3110117059 and 3110118055 to Fei Wang).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhuang Liu and Rongxun Liu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

    Zhuang Liu & Yue Zhang

  2. Early Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, People’s Republic of China

    Rongxun Liu, Ran Zhang, Yange Wei, Rongxin Zhu & Fei Wang

  3. School of Medical Engineering, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China

    Rongxun Liu

  4. Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

    Lijuan Liang

  5. Department of Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China

    Lijuan Liang

  6. Psychology Institute, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Huhehaote, Inner Mongolia, China

    Yang Wang

  7. Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, People’s Republic of China

    Fei Wang

  8. Nanjing Functional Brain Imaging Institute of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, People’s Republic of China

    Fei Wang

Authors
  1. Zhuang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rongxun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ran Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lijuan Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yange Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rongxin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Fei Wang conceived and designed the study. Zhuang Liu, Rongxun Liu and Yue Zhang carried out the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. Ran Zhang and Rongxin Zhu extracted the data and assisted with the manuscript. Yang Wang, Yange Wei, Rongxun Liu and Lijuan Liang were responsible for literature review and data collection. All authors have participated in the preparation of the manuscript and have approved the content of the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rongxin Zhu or Fei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Xinxiang Medical University (XYLL-2020235) and Hainan Medical University (HYLL-2020005), complying with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the participants signed online informed consent before completing the online questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflict interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Liu, R., Zhang, Y. et al. Latent class analysis of depression and anxiety among medical students during COVID-19 epidemic. BMC Psychiatry 21, 498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03459-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03459-w

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us