Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Neuroimmunological investigations of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with recent onset depression – a study protocol

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 35 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A proinflammatory response has been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of depression in a subgroup of patients. However, comprehensive largescale studies on neuroimmunological investigations of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are lacking and no largescale longitudinal CSF studies comparing patients with depression to healthy controls currently exist.

Methods

A longitudinal case-control study including at least 100 patients with first time depression (ICD-10: F32) within the past year with ongoing symptoms and at least 100 sex and age matched healthy controls with collection of CSF, blood, and fecal samples. All individuals will be evaluated by neurological examination including neurological soft signs, interviewed for psychopathology assessment and have symptomatology evaluated by relevant rating scales. Level of functioning and quality of life will be evaluated by a panel of interview questions and rating scales, and cognitive function assessed by a relevant test battery. In addition, a large number of potential confounders will be registered (BMI, smoking status, current medication etc.). Primary outcomes: CSF white cell count, CSF/serum albumin ratio, CSF total protein levels, IgG index, CSF levels of IL-6 and IL-8, and the prevalence of any CNS-reactive autoantibody in CSF and/or blood. Secondary outcomes: exploratory analyses of a wide range of neuroimmunological markers and specific autoantibodies. Power calculations are computed for all primary outcomes based on previous CSF studies including patients with depression and healthy controls.

Discussion

This study will represent the hitherto largest investigation of CSF in patients with recent onset depression compared to healthy controls. We expect to elucidate neuroimmunological alterations in individuals with depression and characterize an immunological profile paving the way for the development of effective treatments based on biomarkers.

Trial registration

The study is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics (Capital Region, j.no: H-16030985) and The Danish Data Protection Agency (j.no: RHP-2016-020, I-Suite no.: 04945).

Peer Review reports

Background

The underlying pathophysiology of depression is heterogeneous and yet not fully understood. In this study we hypothesize that the pathophysiology in a subgroup of patients is caused by altered immunological activation and/or function, as it has been suggested by several authors [1,2,3]. This hypothesis is based on a magnitude of associations and findings from many diverse studies. Epidemiological studies have revealed that immune-related diseases, such as severe infections and autoimmune disorders, are associated with an increased risk of depression [4, 5], while a genome-wide meta-analysis of depression studies has revealed 102 independent gene variants related to depression including genes related to the immune system [6]. A recent meta-analysis investigating immunological differences in blood samples from patients with depression compared to controls have amongst others found interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 to be elevated in patients with depression [7]. The most pronounced inflammatory response in blood is seen in the acute phase of illness, and a decrease in e.g. IL-6 levels is observed following treatment [8]. Blood C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have additionally been associated with symptom severity in women [9], and meta-analyses of placebo controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with anti-inflammatory treatment have shown beneficial effects on depression and depressive symptoms [10, 11]. Together, these findings indicate that a proinflammatory or dysfunctional immunological activation can contribute to the development of depression in a subgroup of patients.

However, the blood is separated from the brain by the blood-brain-barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-barrier - that we hereafter refer to commonly as the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) as this expression is more commonly used in the literature. Measuring of immunological markers in the CSF, the material closest to the brain obtainable from living patients, is the gold standard when conducting studies of neuroinflammation. White cell count (WCC) in CSF is one of the most direct measures of increased immune cell activity within the brain, but is an unspecific indicator of pathological changes, since it can be caused by a variety of disorders [12]. Cytokines are also markers of immune cell activity and a meta-analysis of CSF samples comparing patients with depression to controls found increased levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 in CSF [13]. These cytokines are produced by a variety of cells and are of particular interest when investigating the pathophysiology of depression due to their pro-inflammatory properties [14]. Another marker of increased inflammatory activity is an impaired BBB, since inflammation can increase BBB permeability [15]. A meta-analysis of patients with affective disorders compared to healthy controls showed increased levels of CSF/serum albumin ratio and CSF total protein in patients [16], indicating a more permeable BBB [17, 18] among patients. The most reliable marker of BBB impairment is the CSF/serum albumin ratio [17], but studies on CSF from patients with depression compared to healthy controls are few and small with conflicting results [19, 20]. Intrathecal synthesis of IgG is observed in a variety of inflammatory diseases [21], some of them, e.g. multiple sclerosis [22], with substantial symptom overlap/co-morbidity with depression, but one of the most reliable markers of intrathecal IgG synthesis, the IgG index [21], is only investigated in one small previous study [19]. Autoimmune encephalitis [23] can also cause depression or depressive symptoms; however, no previous studies have compared CNS-reactive autoantibodies in CSF between patients with depression and healthy controls [24]. Furthermore, as a relatively recent hypothesis, the gut microbiota – all the microbes in the gut – has been suggested as a potential contributor to depression pathophysiology [25] mediated by the immune system [26]. The largest study until date included 156 patients with depression and 155 healthy controls and revealed disturbances of the gut microbiota to be related to depression [27]; however, large longitudinal studies are warranted [25] and investigations related to CSF biomarkers of immune system alterations are missing.

Overall previous CSF biomarker studies of patients with depression compared to healthy controls vary in sample size with markers like IL-8 and CSF total protein measured in large cohorts of patients (n = 104 [28] and n = 90 [29], respectively), while other important markers like IL-6 and IgG index are measured only in rather small cohorts of patients (n = 30 [30] and n = 29 [19], respectively). Most of the current CSF studies on inflammatory biomarkers in depression do not have healthy comparison groups, making the interpretation of the results difficult, and no largescale longitudinal studies have investigated neuroimmunological markers related to depression.

In the present study, the most promising biomarkers of neuroinflammation related to depression will be investigated including total CSF WCC, CSF/serum albumin ratio, CSF total protein, IgG index, CSF levels of IL-6 and IL-8, and any CNS-reactive autoantibody in CSF and/or blood. Additionally, exploratory analyses of a broad panel of neuroimmunological markers and specific analyses of CNS-reactive autoantibodies will be carried out. This will be the hitherto most extensive investigation of immune-related changes in CSF, blood and gut microbiota from a large cohort of patients with a recent onset first time depression diagnosis compared to healthy controls and the first study to assess this longitudinally, hereby paving the way for a more precise understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of depression.

Methods/design

An overview of the study process is provided in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Recruitment, inclusion and follow-up. Patients will mainly be recruited from the Referral and Diagnostic Department and healthy volunteers from internet advertisement. Before any examination, the participant will sign the informed consent formula. A variety of potential confounders will be registered by questioning or questionnaires (including body-mass index (BMI), smoking status, current psychotropic and other medication, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), alcohol, eating and exercise habits and more). Contraindications to lumbar puncture will be evaluated. Prior to lumbar puncture a neurological examination including neurological evaluation scale to assess neurological soft signs will be performed and blood samples drawn. After the lumbar puncture the WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview will be conducted (SCAN interview will be conducted prior to lumbar puncture for healthy participants to rule out prior and current psychiatric symptoms). Cognitive testing includes Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B. Questionnaires with self-rating of depressive symptoms (Major Depression Inventory (MDI)), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), diet and exercise will be filled in by the participant. After the visit the following rating scales will be evaluated by the research assistant: Symptom rating (depressive symptoms: Hamilton depression rating scale – 17 items (HAMD-17)/−6 items (HAMD-6) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale - 10 items (MADRS-10)/− 6 items (MADRS-6), manic symptoms: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), anxiety symptoms: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and psychotic symptoms: Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and Scale for Assessment of Positive/Negative Symptoms (SAPS/SANS)) and functioning by Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) and Global Assessment of Functioning. Fecal samples will be collected at home. The participant will be followed up the day after the intervention for the registration of possible side effects. All biological samples will be stored in a biobank for later laboratory analyses. The participant will be followed up after one-two years with repetition of all measurements

Full size image

Study design

A prospective case-control study of a minimum of 100 patients with first time depression (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10): F32) and a minimum of 100 age and sex matched healthy controls.

Study aims

The aim of this study is to identify neuroinflammatory alterations that contribute to the development of depression by longitudinal examinations of CSF, blood and gut microbiota together with thorough psychopathological and neurological examination leading to a more detailed understanding of the interplay between the immune system and the brain.

Primary outcomes

The publication plan with elaboration on primary outcomes is given in Table 1. In the neuroinflammation study the four co-primary outcomes are CSF total WCC, CSF/serum albumin ratio, CSF total protein, and IgG index. In the cytokine study the two co-primary outcomes are CSF levels of IL-6 and IL-8, and in the CNS-reactive autoantibody study the two co-primary outcomes are 1) the presence of any one of seven (see Table 1) CNS-reactive autoantibodies in CSF and 2) CNS-reactive autoantibodies in CSF or blood.

Table 1 Publication plan
Full size table

Secondary outcomes

To exploratively search for differences between patients and healthy controls in a broad variety of neuroimmunological markers, CSF cytokines and chemokines, and specific analyses of CNS-reactive autoantibodies in CSF and/or blood. The secondary outcomes are specified in Table 1.

Setting of study

The study intervention will be conducted at the facility of Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark or where the patient is hospitalized. The study intervention will always take place in an undisturbed room. Patients will be offered transport if needed.

Participant eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria for cases

  1. 1.

    Patients with a first-time diagnosis of a depressive disorder (according to ICD-10: F32) diagnosed within the past year.

  2. 2.

    Ongoing depressive symptoms.

  3. 3.

    Age between 18 and 50 years.

  4. 4.

    Obtainment of written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria for healthy controls

  1. 1.

    Healthy individual.

  2. 2.

    Age between 18 and 50 years.

  3. 3.

    Obtainment of written informed consent.

The healthy controls will preferably be matched with patients in accordance to sex and age.

The exclusion criteria are described and explained in Table 2.

Table 2 Exclusion criteria
Full size table

Sample recruitment

Patients are recruited from the in- and outpatient facilities at The Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark, and a majority of the patients will be recruited from the Referral- and Diagnostic Department (RDD). For a more detailed description see eSupplementary paragraph 1.

Healthy controls will mainly be recruited via a Danish web portal used to find participants for clinical studies (www.forsøgsperson.dk) and will thus represent community controls originating from the same geographic area as the patients in accordance to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for case control studies (NOS) [39].

Study procedure

Information and screening assessment

All participants are screened according to the eligibility criteria prior to the date of enrolment. They are all informed both orally and in writing prior to the enrolment with sufficient time to consider participation. For a detailed description of this procedure see eSupplementary paragraph 2.

Sampling and data recording

For each participant, we aim to perform all clinical measurements and biological samples on the same day. The inclusion starts approximately at 9:00 a.m., but due to feasibility the starting time can fluctuate between 8:00-10:00 a.m. The study program is scheduled to last 3-5 h and will vary depending on symptom severity and the participant’s need for breaks. For a detailed description of the study time schedule see eSupplementary Paragraph 3 and eTable 1.

Consent

Before any examination is carried out, informed written consent for participation is obtained (for more details, see eSupplementary Paragraph 2).

Clinical measures

All participants will undergo an interview using WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) [40], including chapters 4 (anxiety symptoms), 6, 7, 8 (depressive symptoms), 10 (manic symptoms), 16, 17, 18 and 19 (psychotic symptoms), since these chapters cover the most severe psychiatric symptoms with the highest relevance to our study. The purposes of the SCAN-interview will be two: 1) for patients to confirm the depression diagnosis given by the clinician and to characterize symptomatology, 2) for healthy controls to exclude present or prior psychiatric illness. All interviewers are certified in performing SCAN interviews. Healthy controls will be interviewed prior to blood sampling and lumbar puncture, to ensure that no psychiatric disorders are present. All participants will undergo a thorough neurological examination including Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) for evaluation of Neurological Soft Signs (NSS) as described by Dazzan et al. [41] prior to lumbar puncture.

Some questions have been added to the interview of the participants in order for the interviewers to afterwards be able to rate the participant on the following psychopathology rating scales; 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) [42], 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-6) [43], 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-10) [44] and 6-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-6) [45], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) [46], Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) [47], Scale for Assessment of Positive/Negative Symptoms (SAPS/SANS) [48], and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [49]. Functioning will be assessed using Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) [50] and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) [51].

During the visit, all participants will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires including Major Depression Inventory (MDI) [52], and quality of life by EQ-5D-5L and visual analogue scale of Quality of Life (VAS QL) [53].

Cognitive testing will be done using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) [54], Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [55], Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [56] and Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B [57]. All testers are certified in using BACS.

Other self-reported measures

The following self-reported data is collected; height, weight, smoking status, alcohol intake, use of recreational drugs, allergies, somatic illnesses, prior and concurrent psychiatric disorders, current medication (both psychotropic and non-psychotropic), intake of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and antihistamines in the prior 2 weeks, use of antibiotics in the prior six months, information on participants menstrual cycle, time for last intake of food and years of education. Information on prior and concurrent psychiatric disorders and medication status/duration is confirmed by the medical record as well. Information on current diet and exercise habits will be provided from a modified version of a questionnaire [58] used for evaluation of national health in Denmark by the Danish Health Authority [59] (eSupplementary paragraph 6).

Quality control

To minimize interrater variability, we will regularly conduct co-evaluation of patients with main focus on rating scales. Two research assistants will participate in a full participant inclusion and will individually be diagnosing and rating the participant. Any discrepancies will be noted and discussed with a specialist in psychiatry.

Validation of diagnosis – case definition

In accordance with the NOS, the gold standard for an adequate case definition is independent validation. All patients will be evaluated by SCAN interview. Additionally, patients who require hospital-based treatment (in- or outpatients) are evaluated by the treating psychiatrist in the clinic before referral to the study. Patients who are not treated at in- or outpatient facilities of the psychiatric hospitals (e.g. followed by a private psychiatrist) will be either independently evaluated by an experienced psychiatrist who will watch the video recording of the SCAN interview or by consensus diagnosis with an experienced specialist in psychiatry. The SCAN interviewer will not be blinded to patient status or diagnosis.

Follow-up

The patients will be invited to a follow-up visit after one to two years after enrolment. This follow-up visit is planned to include all the same measurements (including blood and CSF measurements) as for the primary visit and a Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) will be added [60]. By the follow-up assessment we expect to collect data that can enhance the understanding of the association between neuroinflammation and depression/depressive symptoms. Furthermore, trajectories of neuroinflammatory markers will be addressed by follow-up of later psychiatric diagnoses in the well validated Danish registers, also for participants who do not attend follow-up visit, in order to search for predictors of disorder progression. We will in detail conduct an analysis plan for the analyses of the follow-up assessments before the end of follow-up inclusion and prior to data analyses.

Biological samples and measures

To minimize the impact of diurnal variation all samples are to be collected between 8.30 a.m. and 01.00 p.m.

Blood samples

Venous blood samples will be collected prior to lumbar puncture and we aim to have ≥90% of blood samples collected between 9.30 and 11.30 a.m. Prior to the blood sample, a skin swab is performed and stored at −80°C for quality control analyses. A maximum of 44 mL of blood will be sampled; 8 mL used for initial analyses and 36 mL stored for later use. For a detailed description of blood sample drawing and equipment, see eSupplementary Paragraph 4.1.

Cerebrospinal fluid samples

The lumbar puncture will be carried out according to current consensus [61], and we aim to have ≥90% of CSF samples collected between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 p.m. We furthermore aim for the time from collection of blood samples to collection of CSF samples to not exceed 35 min for ≥90% of participants. In brief, the participant will preferably be placed in a lateral decubitus position. The L3/L4 or L4/5 space will be identified, and local anesthesia will be given in the form of a sufficient amount of lidocaine (depending on the size of the participant). Prior to the lumbar puncture, a skin swab will be performed and stored at −80°C for quality control analyses. The lumbar puncture will be carried out preferably using an atraumatic 22G needle. Two mL will be taken for routine examination and 14 mL will be stored in the biobank for later analysis. The samples are to be analyzed as fast as possible and within 1 h from the first droplet of CSF. For details regarding the lumbar puncture, procedure and equipment see eSupplementary Paragraph 4.2.

Procedures for biobank storage

Thirty-six mL of blood and 14 mL of CSF will be used for biobank storage and will be stored both on filter papers and portioned in 0.5 ul aliquots after centrifuging at 1145 G for 10 min. For further details of blood and CSF storage procedures, see eSupplementary Paragraph 4.3.

Measures of safety regarding lumbar puncture

In order to assess the risk of adverse events associated with lumbar puncture, participants are contacted on the day after the intervention. All symptoms that could be due to the procedure are noted with specific focus on possible post lumbar headache and infections.

Fecal samples

Each participant is asked to provide a fecal sample, either during the inclusion, or afterwards from home. Fecal samples are collected in two ways, both in a Sarstedt tube (Sarstedt, Bording, Denmark) and by using the OMNIgene•GUT OMR-200 Sample Collection Kit (DNAgenotek™, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). If collected at home, the fecal samples will be sent by mail, and then stored in the freezer at − 80 degrees Celsius. Samples done during the visit will be frozen immediately. A score on the Bristol Stool Scale [62], time and date of sampling, as well as time and date of freezing is to be noted. Freeze/thaw cycles are avoided. Since gut microbiota research is fast developing, a detailed analysis plan for the gut microbiota samples is planned to be conducted later on before finishing the longitudinal collection of samples prior to analyses.

Other biological measures

Blood pressure and pulse will be measured prior to the neurological examination.

Registry data

We will use the Danish registers to obtain information on socioeconomic factors and prior, current and future medical history, such as prior infections treated in the primary care sector, comorbidities, treatment outcome (e.g., psychiatric readmissions and change in medication) and later psychiatric diagnoses.

Data storage

All data will be kept in secured folders and in the database RedCap [63, 64] in accordance with approval from The Danish Data Protection Agency. Written consent formulas will be kept in a locked locker in a locked office, and additionally stored electronically in secured folders. For more detailed information on data storage and pseudonymization see eSupplementary Paragraph 4.4.

Biological sample storage

All cryo vials will be placed at − 80 degrees Celsius as soon as possible, and time for freezing will be noted. The filter papers will be left to dry overnight at room temperature and placed at − 80 degrees Celsius on the next day. For details see eSupplementary Paragraph 4.3. Fecal samples will be stored at − 80 degrees.

Laboratory analyses

All analyses will be run blinded by pseudonymization. Laboratory analyses will be performed according to a statistically designed experimental schedule based on a randomized block design or similar, to minimize the risk of confounding by time of analysis, batch and other factors.

Immediate analyses

Eight mL of blood and two mL of CSF will be analyzed immediately at Rigshospitalet. Initial blood analyses include; white blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, platelets (Sysmex XN9000, Sysmex), high sensitivity CRP, IgG (cobas® 8000 modul c502, Roche), albumin, glucose (cobas® 8000 modul c702, Roche) and HbA1c (Tosoh G8, Sysmex). Initial CSF analyses include; WCC (Sysmex XN9000, Sysmex), differential count (DM96, CellaVision), albumin, IgG, total protein (cobas® 8000 modul c502, Roche), erythrocytes (Sysmex XN9000, Sysmex), glucose and lactate (ABL800 FLEX, Radiometer).

Primary outcome analyses

CSF total WCC, CSF/serum albumin ratio, CSF total protein and IgG index will be analyzed immediately as described above. IgG index is calculated by the following formula:

$$\frac{CSF_{IgG}/{Blood}_{IgG}}{CSF_{Albumin}/{Blood}_{Albumin}}$$

CSF Cytokines are planned to be analyzed using the V-plex Neuroinflammation Panel 1 Human Kit from Meso Scale Diagnostics. CSF and blood CNS-reactive autoantibodies are planned to be analyzed by Autoimmune Encephalitis Mosaic 1 and GAD65 panels from Euroimmun.

Primary and secondary outcomes for gut microbiota analysis are yet to be defined due to the fast development of gut microbiota research. However, a detailed analysis plan including well defined primary and secondary outcomes for gut microbiota samples will be conducted prior to finishing the longitudinal collection of samples.

Statistical analysis plan

Power and sample size calculations are based on two-sample t-tests using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and based on not yet published results from a meta-analysis from our group comparing patients with unipolar depression to healthy controls. If all values are observed above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), we expect the power for CSF/serum albumin ratio and CSF total protein to be high (95% or higher), whereas the power for IgG index and CSF total WCC are expected to be low (< 50%) though effect sizes in previous studies are heterogenic. For IL-6 we expect good power (> 80%), but low power for IL-8 (< 50%).

Based on previous studies we expect a proportion of biomarker measurements to be lower than LLOQ, most pronounced in the control group. By simulation, we found that given an effect size leading to a power of 80% without censoring, 33% censoring will only reduce power with a maximum of 5%, while 50% censoring will only reduce power with a maximum of 10%, when using the censored Gaussian model (see eSupplementary for further details).

Regarding CNS-reactive autoantibodies the current evidence of expected findings in CSF from healthy controls is very limited. We expect no positive CNS-reactive autoantibodies in the CSF among control subjects [24] and a previous study found no CNS-reactive autoantibodies in CSF from patients either [65]. However, 0.23% of healthy controls [24] and 0.4% of patients with affective syndromes [65] had measurable CNS-reactive autoantibodies in blood.

Linear models will be applied for comparison of all continuous primary outcomes adjusting for sex and age. All continuous outcomes being measured as concentrations or ratios will be log-transformed before analysis (if zeroes are present, a small value, estimated by profile maximum likelihood, will be added to all observations prior to analysis [66]). If values of an outcome are observed below LLOQ, we will use the censored Gaussian model instead of the linear model.

Pearson chi-square test without adjustment for continuity will be applied for analyses of CNS-reactive antibodies. All results of primary and secondary analyses will be reported with the effect size, 95% confidence intervals and p-values. Two-sided tests with p < 0.05 will be considered significant. All analyses will be done in the program R version 4.0.5 [67] or later using the package “survival” [68] to fit the censored Gaussian model.

Discussion

Selection of primary and secondary outcomes

The most recent meta-analyses in this field indicate that large-scale CSF studies of depression are needed [13, 16]. As primary outcomes, total CSF WCC reflects differences in the overall amount of immune cells, while impaired BBB will be explored by CSF/serum albumin ratio and CSF total protein. IL-6 and IL-8 reflecting low grade inflammation are the most relevant cytokines, since activation of the innate immune system in depression pathophysiology seems to be one of the most promising theories [3]. Intrathecal IgG production will be assessed by IgG index and possible autoimmune etiologies will be explored by autoantibody analyses of CSF and blood. These co-primary outcomes have been selected based on the reflections presented in Table 1.

The secondary outcomes will consist of broader and more exploratory analyses of neuroimmunological markers (including CSF differential cell count, lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio, CSF/serum IgG and a broad panel of cytokines and chemokines) and autoantibody profiles hereby providing information for a more thorough biological understanding of the etiology/pathophysiology of depression.

Selection of study population

We intend to study patients with a first-time diagnosis of depression within the past year, since we expect immunological differences to be more pronounced in the early stages and at acute onset of depression. Additionally, this approach enhances our possibilities of evaluating the CSF neuroimmunological biomarkers as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the participants’ trajectories will be assessed by clinical follow-up and follow-up in the nationwide Danish registers.

Case definition

All patients will be interviewed following the SCAN manual and in accordance to NOS we will strive for an independent diagnostic evaluation of > 95% of the patients. SCAN is a well validated and widely used instrument in assessing, measuring and classifying the psychopathology and behavior associated with the major psychiatric syndromes in adult life [40].

Symptom rating scales

We evaluate the severity of depression by interviewer-rated scales (HAMD-17/6 and MADRS-10/6) and by the self-rating scale MDI. A detailed description of symptom rating scales is provided in eSupplementary paragraph 5.

Risk of bias

We expect some eligible patients to decline participation solely due to the lumbar puncture. This is partly overcome by increasing knowledge of the procedure among patients and hospital staff, since lack of knowledge seems to contribute the most to unwillingness towards lumbar puncture [69].

The intervention has a time frame of approximately 3-5 h introducing the risk of the most severely depressed patients rejecting participation due to the duration of the intervention. This is overcome by breaking the inclusion down in smaller parts performed in different days and offering breaks whenever needed, and it is accepted that the most severely ill patients do not fulfill questionnaires or cognitive testing.

Furthermore, it is essential to exclude patients treated with electroshock therapy (ECT), because ECT leads to a substantial proinflammatory response and there is some evidence of induced short-term neuroinflammation [37]. Patients who receive ECT will be invited to participate three months after their last ECT session, if they still fulfill the eligibility criteria, even though this can potentially result in inclusion of patients with less severe depression.

Risk of recall bias

Several measures in this study are self-reported, introducing a risk of inaccuracy in data (e.g., reported weight and alcohol consumption); however, we do not expect this to differ between the groups. Additionally, we expect most of the self-reported data to be more reliable (e.g., reports of actual intake of medication) and more extensive (e.g., well-being, eating habits and exercise) than the available register data.

Strengths and limitations

CSF is the obtainable material closest to the brain and the gold standard when conducting studies investigating immunological biomarkers of depression, and the collection of CSF samples is a substantial strength of this study. Previous studies of e.g. CSF IL-6 in depression have included far smaller sample sizes compared to this present study and the large sample size of this study is an important strength. Additionally, the thorough psychopathological evaluation and case definition by SCAN and broad symptom evaluation (discussed earlier and in eSupplementary paragraph 5) are considerable strengths due to the strong case definition and the availability of data for subgroup analyses based on symptoms. The interrater quality control of the SCAN interviews improves the quality of data. The broad variety in data collection (biological samples, thorough psychopathological evaluation, cognitive testing, level of function, quality of life and self-reported data) is also a strength as the exploratory analyses can evaluate diverse types of biomarkers for depression.

This study is to some extent limited by a potential selection bias due to willingness towards the lumbar puncture procedure (discussed previously). Furthermore, we expect the most severely ill patients to be less likely to participate (discussed previously). By including only patients with a recent onset depression and, as close to symptom debut as possible, it is aimed to minimize the proportion of included patients treated with antidepressant medication at the time of assessment. However, it is a limitation of this study that some participants are expected to be treated by antidepressants, since antidepressants have been suggested to yield immunomodulatory effects [70].

Risks and side effects

Lumbar puncture is a commonly used procedure for diagnostics of CNS disorders and serious complications are very rare with the most common side effects being backache, nerve root irritation and headache, while infections are described only in case reports [32]. By using the atraumatic needle, the risk of inducing post lumbar puncture headache is reduced to approximately 4% [71]. We consider the procedure to be safe when carried out by a trained physician after a comprehensive neurological evaluation and screening for contra-indications. The day after the lumbar puncture, the participant will receive a phone call and any side effects will be registered. If the participant experiences severe post lumbar puncture headache, the participant will be admitted to the nearest neurological department in accordance with current practice in the Capital Region of Denmark.

Ethical considerations

The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (64thWMA general assembly; Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013), and other applicable laws and regulations. Participants will always be informed of the risks listed under "Risks and side effects" in accordance to the paragraph "Information and screening assessment". It is emphasized that the participant has the right to retract the consent at any time and, for patients, that this will have no influence on future treatment in the psychiatric department/clinic. All individuals will be pseudoanonymized when analyzing the data. The identity of participants will only be used for merging of the data and retrieving biological samples. Data will only be published in a manner where no individuals can be identified.

Unexpected findings

Lumbar puncture is routinely used for diagnosing a variety of disorders, e.g. multiple sclerosis and dementia, associated with depression [72, 73], and CSF analysis of patients initially diagnosed with depression have been reported to lead to re-diagnosis in rare cases [74]. Based on this, we expect that some of the examinations and/or samples could lead to unexpected findings regarding the health status of patients (or healthy controls). If a consent here fore has been given, the participant will be contacted and referred to further relevant investigations (e.g., a neurological department). If the findings are life threatening, the participant will be contacted regardless of consent.

Depression in a larger perspective – the PSYCH-FLAME study

The project described in this protocol paper is part of the larger PSYCH-FLAME project investigating the immune system’s involvement in psychotic [75] and affective disorders, from a nationwide angle with large-scale register-based studies, immunogenetic studies, CSF and blood biobank studies to a thorough characterization of a cohort including 100 adults with first depressive episode and 100 adults with debut of non-affective psychotic disorders compared to at least 100 age and sex matched healthy controls. This comprehensive investigation of the associations between the immune system and mental health illnesses will hopefully pave the way for better and more precise treatment in the future.

Perspectives and clinical implications

Large, well-conducted CSF studies are lacking and will have the potential to improve diagnostics and treatment of individuals currently diagnosed with depression, and to identify new biomarkers associated with the disorders. This study represents the largest, most comprehensive study to date investigating immunological and neurological biomarkers of patients with recent onset first time depression compared to healthy controls, and it will be the first study to investigate these biomarkers longitudinally with the potential to gain new insight into the correlations between symptoms of depression and neuroinflammation.

We expect the currently defined group of patients with depression to be divided into subgroups that are more homogenous than the current broad classification of depression. Stratification based initially on CSF biomarkers will subsequently be sought extended to blood-based biomarkers for easier clinical management. This could contribute to a paradigmatic change and pave the way for development of more effective treatments based on biomarkers in some cases, as opposed to only being based on clinical observations.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting findings from the study will be presented within the manuscripts and/or additional supporting files of the given publication. Person identifiable data can due to Danish legislation only be shared after approval from the Danish Data Protection Agency through a reasonable request to the study PI Professor Michael Eriksen Benros.

Abbreviations

BACS:

Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia

BBB:

Blood-brain-barrier

BDI:

Beck Depression Inventory

BMI:

Bodymass index

CNS:

Central nervous system

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ECT:

Electroshock therapy

GAF:

Global Assessment of Functioning

HAM-A:

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

HAMD-6:

6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

HAMD-17:

17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IL-6/− 8:

Interleukin-6/− 8

LLOQ:

Lower limit of quantification

MADRS-6:

6-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

MADRS-10:

10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

MDI:

Major Depression Inventory

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

MoCA:

Montreal Cognitive Assessment

NES:

Neurological Evaluation Scale

NOS:

Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for case control studies

NSS:

Neurological Soft Signs

PANSS:

Positive and Negative Symptom Scale

PSP:

Personal and Social Performance Scale

QPR:

Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery

RDD:

Referral- and Diagnostic Department

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SAPS/SANS:

Scale for Assessment of Positive/Negative Symptoms

SCAN:

WHO Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry

SMDs:

Standardized mean differences

TMT:

Trail Making Test

WBC:

White blood cell

WCC:

White cell count

YMRS:

Young Mania Rating Scale

References

  1. Yang C, Tiemessen KM, Bosker FJ, Wardenaar KJ, Lie J, Schoevers RA. Interleukin, tumor necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein profiles in melancholic and non-melancholic depression: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2018;111:58–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rantala MJ, Luoto S, Krams I, Karlsson H. Depression subtyping based on evolutionary psychiatry: proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;69:603–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mac Giollabhui N, Ng TH, Ellman LM, Alloy LB. The longitudinal associations of inflammatory biomarkers and depression revisited: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(7):3302-3314. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00867-4.

  4. Benros ME, Waltoft BL, Nordentoft M, Ostergaard SD, Eaton WW, Krogh J, et al. Autoimmune diseases and severe infections as risk factors for mood disorders: a nationwide study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(8):812–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodwin RD. Association between infection early in life and mental disorders among youth in the community: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard DM, Adams MJ, Clarke T-K, Hafferty JD, Gibson J, Shirali M, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Osimo EF, Pillinger T, Rodriguez IM, Khandaker GM, Pariante CM, Howes OD. Inflammatory markers in depression: a meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:901–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldsmith DR, Rapaport MH, Miller BJ. A meta-analysis of blood cytokine network alterations in psychiatric patients: comparisons between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(12):1696–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Köhler-Forsberg O, Buttenschøn HN, Tansey KE, Maier W, Hauser J, Dernovsek MZ, et al. Association between C-reactive protein (CRP) with depression symptom severity and specific depressive symptoms in major depression. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;62:344–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Husain MI, Strawbridge R, Stokes PR, Young AH. Anti-inflammatory treatments for mood disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31(9):1137–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohler-Forsberg O, Lydholm N, C, Hjorthoj C, Nordentoft M, Mors O, Benros ME. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment on major depressive disorder or depressive symptoms: meta-analysis of clinical trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019;139(5):404–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Østergaard AA, Sydenham TV, Nybo M, Andersen ÅB. Cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis level as a diagnostic predictor? A cross-sectional study. BMC Clin Pathol. 2017;17:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Enache D, Pariante CM, Mondelli V. Markers of central inflammation in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining cerebrospinal fluid, positron emission tomography and post-mortem brain tissue. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;81:24–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Troubat R, Barone P, Leman S, Desmidt T, Cressant A, Atanasova B, et al. Neuroinflammation and depression: a review. Eur J Neurosci. 2021;53(1):151–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolp HB, Dziegielewska KM. Review: role of developmental inflammation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35(2):132–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orlovska-waast S, Köhler-forsberg O, Wiben S, Merete B, Kondziella D, Krogh J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers of inflammation and infections in schizophrenia and affective disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:869–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tumani H, Hegen H. CSF albumin: albumin CSF/serum ratio (marker for blood-CSF barrier function). In: Deisenhammer F, Sellebjerg F, Teunissen CE, Tumani H, editors. Cerebrospinal fluid in clinical neurology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 111–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson M, Alvarez-Cermeño J, Bernardi G, Cogato I, Fredman P, Frederiksen J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(8):897–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hampel H, Kotter HU, Padberg F, Korschenhausen DA, Moller HJ. Oligoclonal bands and blood--cerebrospinal-fluid barrier dysfunction in a subset of patients with Alzheimer disease: comparison with vascular dementia, major depression, and multiple sclerosis. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999;13(1):9–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gudmundsson P, Skoog I, Waern M, Blennow K, Palsson S, Rosengren L, et al. The relationship between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and depression in elderly women. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;15(10):832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sellebjerg F. Immunoglobulins in Cerebrospinal Fluid. In: Deisenhammer F, Sellebjerg F, Teunissen CE, Tumani H, editors. Cerebrospinal Fluid in Clinical Neurology. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 116–26.

  22. Magyari M, Sorensen PS. Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2020;11:851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Herken J, Prüss H. Red flags: clinical signs for identifying autoimmune encephalitis in psychiatric patients. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lang K, Prüss H. Frequencies of neuronal autoantibodies in healthy controls: estimation of disease specificity. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. 2017;4(5):e386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simpson CA, Diaz-Arteche C, Eliby D, Schwartz OS, Simmons JG, Cowan CSM. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression - a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;83:101943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Foster JA, Baker GB, Dursun SM. The relationship between the gut microbiome-immune system-brain Axis and major depressive disorder. Front Neurol. 2021;12:721126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang J, Zheng P, Li Y, Wu J, Tan X, Zhou J, et al. Landscapes of bacterial and metabolic signatures and their interaction in major depressive disorders. Sci Adv. 2020;6(49):eaba8555. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8555.

  28. Hidese S, Hattori K, Sasayama D, Tsumagari T, Miyakawa T, Matsumura R, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with major psychiatric disorders: a multiplex immunoassay study. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:594394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Omori W, Hattori K, Kajitani N, Tsuchioka MO, Boku S, Kunugi H, et al. Increased matrix metalloproteinases in cerebrospinal fluids of patients with major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;23(11):713–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sasayama D, Hattori K, Wakabayashi C, Teraishi T, Hori H, Ota M, et al. Increased cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 levels in patients with schizophrenia and those with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(3):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strik H, Nagel I. Cell Count and Staining. In: Deisenhammer FF, Sellebjerg F, Teunissen CE, Tumani H, editors. Cerebrospinal Fluid in Clinical Neurology. Cham; 2015. p. 82–100.

  32. Costerus JM, Brouwer MC, van de Beek D. Technological advances and changing indications for lumbar puncture in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(3):268–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hegen H, Auer M, Zeileis A, Deisenhammer F. Upper reference limits for cerebrospinal fluid total protein and albumin quotient based on a large cohort of control patients: implications for increased clinical specificity. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(2):285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mazza MG, Lucchi S, Tringali AGM, Rossetti A, Botti ER, Clerici M. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in mood disorders: a meta-analysis. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baggiolini M, Walz A, Kunkel SL. Neutrophil-activating peptide-1/interleukin 8, a novel cytokine that activates neutrophils. J Clin Invest. 1989;84(4):1045–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Engelborghs S, Niemantsverdriet E, Struyfs H, Blennow K, Brouns R, Comabella M, et al. Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. Alzheimers Dement (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2017;8:111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yrondi A, Sporer M, Péran P, Schmitt L, Arbus C, Sauvaget A. Electroconvulsive therapy, depression, the immune system and inflammation: a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(1):29–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yip L, McCluskey J, Sinclair R. Immunological aspects of pregnancy. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(2):84–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. GA Wells, B Shea, D O’Connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos PT. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2021. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 22 Nov 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wing JK, Babor T, Brugha T, Burke J, Cooper JE, Giel R, et al. SCAN. Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(6):589–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dazzan P, Lloyd T, Morgan KD, Zanelli J, Morgan C, Orr K, et al. Neurological abnormalities and cognitive ability in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(3):197–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23(1):56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Timmerby N, Andersen JH, Søndergaard S, Østergaard SD, Bech P. A systematic review of the Clinimetric properties of the 6-item version of the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D6). Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(3):141–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bech P, Tanghøj P, Cialdella P, Andersen HF, Pedersen AG. Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;7(3):283–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Andreasen NC, Olsen S. Negative v positive schizophrenia. Definition and validation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(7):789–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133(5):429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV social and occupational functioning assessment scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;101(4):323–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Startup M, Jackson MC, Bendix S. The concurrent validity of the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol. 2002;41(Pt 4):417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bech P. Quality of life instruments in depression. Eur Psychiatry. 1997;12(4):194–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Keefe RSE, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Gold JM, Poe MP, Coughenour L. The brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr Res. 2004;68(2–3):283–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-mental state examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(7):812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Danskernes Sundhed - Tal fra Den Nationale Sundhedsprofil. Spørgeskema 2017. 2014. https://www.danskernessundhed.dk/Spoergeskema.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2021.

  59. Jensen HAR, Davidsen M, Ekholm O, Christensen AI. Danskernes Sundhed - Den Nationale Sundhedsprofil 2017. 2018. https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2018/~/media/73EADC242CDB46BD8ABF9DE895A6132C.ashx . Accessed 22 Nov 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Law H, Neil ST, Dunn G, Morrison AP. Psychometric properties of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR). Schizophr Res. 2014;156(2–3):184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Teunissen CE, Petzold A, Bennett JL, Berven FS, Brundin L, Comabella M, et al. A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking. Neurology. 2009;73(22):1914–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. O’Donnell LJ, Virjee J, Heaton KW. Detection of pseudodiarrhoea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate. BMJ. 1990;300(6722):439–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Endres D, Meixensberger S, Dersch R, Feige B, Stich O, Venhoff N, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid, antineuronal autoantibody, EEG, and MRI findings from 992 patients with schizophreniform and affective psychosis. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. fourth Edi. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. R CORE Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. https://www.r-project.org/.

  68. Therneau TM, Lumley T, Atkinson E, Crowson C. Package “Survival” - Survival Analysis. 2021. https://github.com/therneau/survival

    Google Scholar 

  69. Witbracht MG, Bernstein OM, Lin V, Salazar CR, Sajjadi SA, Hoang D, et al. Education and message framing increase willingness to undergo research lumbar puncture: a randomized controlled trial. Front Med. 2020;7:493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gałecki P, Mossakowska-Wójcik J, Talarowska M. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of antidepressants - SSRIs, SNRIs. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;80(Pt C):291–4.

  71. Nath S, Koziarz A, Badhiwala JH, Alhazzani W, Jaeschke R, Sharma S, et al. Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10126):1197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dafsari FS, Jessen F. Depression-an underrecognized target for prevention of dementia in Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Bruno A, Dolcetti E, Rizzo FR, Fresegna D, Musella A, Gentile A, et al. Inflammation-associated synaptic alterations as shared threads in depression and multiple sclerosis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Bechter K, Reiber H, Herzog S, Fuchs D, Tumani H, Maxeiner HG. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in affective and schizophrenic spectrum disorders: Identification of subgroups with immune responses and blood–CSF barrier dysfunction. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(5):321–30 [cited 2018 Aug 2]. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022395609001848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Jeppesen R, Orlovska-Waast S, Vindegaard Sørensen N, Christensen RHB, Benros ME. Immunological investigations of the cerebrospinal fluid in patients with recent onset psychotic disorders: a study protocol. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Gunnar Houen for his assistance on the lab technical part of this project, and all others who helped directly or indirectly, particularly the clinicians in the recruiting centers whom are to help of us with recruitment of patients and in particular the Referral- and Diagnostic Department.

Funding

The present study was funded by an unrestricted grant from The Lundbeck Foundation (grant number R268-2016-3925). The funders had no role in the acquisition of the data, interpretation of the results or the decision to publish the findings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 15, 4. sal, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark

    Nina Vindegaard Sørensen, Sonja Orlovska-Waast, Rose Jeppesen, Rune Haubo Christensen & Michael Eriksen Benros

  2. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Nina Vindegaard Sørensen, Sonja Orlovska-Waast, Rose Jeppesen & Michael Eriksen Benros

Authors
  1. Nina Vindegaard Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonja Orlovska-Waast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rose Jeppesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rune Haubo Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Eriksen Benros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MEB planned the study, received the funding, is the Principal Investigator, and supervisor of the project. The detailed practical planning of the study has been by NVS, RJ and SOW supervised by MEB. NVS drafted this protocol manuscript. NVS and RHC drafted the statistics paragraph. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eriksen Benros.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics in the Capital Region of Copenhagen (j.no: H-16030985) and The Danish Data Protection Agency (j.no: RHP-2016-020, I-Suite no.: 04945). Written informed content is obtained before enrolment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sørensen, N.V., Orlovska-Waast, S., Jeppesen, R. et al. Neuroimmunological investigations of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with recent onset depression – a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 22, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03633-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03633-0

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us