Skip to main content

Evaluating family knowledge about sexual health in patients with severe mental illness: a qualitative study in Iran



Although paying more attention to sex education in patients with severe mental illness is recommended in the literature, the role of families has not been specifically clarified. 


This study aims to explore family knowledge about sexual health in patients with severe mental illness in Iran.


We conducted a total number of 21 interviews with 4 patients, 5 families, 7 psychiatrists, 1 general practitioner, 2 nurses, and 2 psychologists through purposive sampling. The text was analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis.


The family knowledge about patients’ sexual health is described in three subcategories: ‘informal sources for knowledge acquisition’, ‘common myths, and ‘inappropriate reaction to the patients’ needs”.


Family sex education should be integrated into a comprehensive rehabilitation program to promote sexual health in patients with severe mental illness. Family members should be aware of the necessity of accurate information about patients’ sexual concerns.

Peer Review reports


The Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) believe that sex education is an inalienable right for all human beings [14]. Sex education has sometimes been neglected in patients with severe mental illness (SMI) [4, 28, 30, 33, 34, 40].

According to the literature, paying more attention to sex education in patients with severe mental illness is recommended. Risky behaviours and substance uses are some risk factors that make these patients prone to sexually transmitted diseases (STD) [4, 8, 23, 24, 31, 32, 35, 43]. A recent study in Ethiopia presents some predictors for risky behaviours in these patients including, male gender, illiteracy, bipolarity, history of hospitalization, perceived internal stigma and poor social support [10].

These at-risk patients do not have sufficient knowledge about HIV-related issues [18]. A recent meta-analysis proposed that sexual health need assessment should be integrated into the routine practice [16, 18, 24]. Therefore, health care providers; and nurses should be trained to educate patients and their families [18].

Family involvement in SMI

Family members are providing informal care to these patients [6, 36]. A study suggests that 50–80% of patients with schizophrenia are in close contact with their relatives in western countries [6]. We should note that there are some differences between some western countries. Northern and southern European countries display this distinction. The family plays a smaller importance in Finland, a northern European country, than it does in Spain, a southern European country [37]. In Iran, as a developing country, most of the patients live with their relatives. Therefore, the role of the family is critical in this context [29]. Another crucial point is that in Iranian culture, sexual concerns appear to be a taboo subject that families are typically hesitant to discuss [1], and this is likely to be exacerbated in families with a patient with serious mental illness.

Gaps in current family intervention/psychoeducation

The implementation of family involvement in mental health care, particularly for persons with severe mental illness has been emphasized based on convincing reasons. Review of the literature indicates that family interventions may improve social function, self-experienced health and adherence with medication. Moreover, it decreases the frequency of relapse, hospital admissions in patients with severe mental illness [15].

Despite of the fact that many individuals with SMI are intermittently sexually active, and those who are sexually active tend to engage in risky sexual practices, role of the family intervention in this area has not been noted. While, some of these patients have cognitive processing difficulties or are unable to articulate their thoughts, which may interfere with their ability to attend to, understand, or process information in sexual risk reduction interventions [38]. In such a cases of patients with SMI, active role of the family in sex education program cannot be ignored.

Sexual health needs and risks

Sexuality education and healthcare should be available to everyone. A sexual rights-based approach appears to be especially relevant for potentially vulnerable populations such as those with severe mental illness [21]. Women and young people with mental illnesses have unique demands in terms of sexuality and sexual health education. They could also be more vulnerable towards sexual abuse and exploitation as a result of unequal power balances in relationships and/or early experiences of sexual abuse, increased rates of re-victimization in adulthood [39]. Gordon et al., reported that sexual activity in severe mental illness patients was frequently unplanned, ending in unprotected sex, and that risk perceptions were frequently erroneous, leading in a lack of willingness to reduce sexual risk behaviors [12]. Individuals with severe mental illness are frequently unable to work, results in homelessness and poverty. As a consequence, they cannot afford condoms, lack the privacy to discuss safer sex with partners, and may live in regions where STDs and HIV are prevalent [38]. In general, people with SMIs appear to engage in behaviors that put them at higher risk for HIV and other STDs.

Patients with severe mental illness, as a vulnerable population that engages in high-risk behaviors, should have access to sexual health program education. Family engagement and psychoeducation should include not only general information about the health service, the disease process, relapse symptoms, and medication, but also information regarding the patient’s sexual life. This study aims to explore the knowledge of family members about sexual health in patients with SMI in Iran.

Material & method


This qualitative study is part of a research project on designing an educational package about sexual health for patients with SMI.


The interviews with the patients or family members were made in a private location in the rehabilitation center of one of the main referral psychiatric hospitals in Tehran, which mostly provide mental health services to consumers with a low socioeconomic status. In addition, the interviews with the health care providers were conducted in their offices or clinic.


We used purposive sampling to select the participants. We conducted 21 face-to-face, deep and semi-structured interviews with 4 patients, 5 families, 7 psychiatrists, 1 general practitioner, 2 nurses, and 2 psychologists. The mean age of patients and family members was 33 (17–49) and 50 (29–60) years old, respectively. The mean age of clinicians was 59 (42–70). All of them were Iranian, sexual orientation of all patients were heterosexual, they were in middle social level. Two of patients and 3 family members were diploma, and others had academic education. All of the health care providers were experts in their field. The eligible criteria for patient participants were being over 18 years old and having the diagnosis of SMI in the remission phase. The eligible criteria for family members were being over 18 years old and having a relative with SMI. Patients with the diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective or bipolar disorder were considered as having a severe mental illness.

Two psychiatrists and a provider with a doctorate in reproductive health care conducted the interviews. The duration of each interview was 60–90 min. An expert psychiatrist in the psychosexual field supervised all the qualitative interviews.


We explained the aim of the research to all of the participants and audio recorded all of the interviews. Nobody refused to participate, and nobody dropped out.

In the interviews, the healthcare provider participants were asked about their general experience regarding sexuality in patients with severe mental illness. Then, the interviewer tried to address experiences that were more related to the study, such as sexual needs in patients with SMI and the role of the family. The patients and family members were asked their opinion about patients’ sexual issues and the necessity to access educational content. Then experiencing any challenges in sexual issues due to the illness, sexual concerns and some more specific domains were addressed (please see the topic guide).

According to the answers, the interviewer used probing and reflective expressions to encourage experiential specificity [25].

The authors suggested a guideline for the interviews. This guideline was used in the first two pilot interviews and corrected according to the team members’ feedback.


After the interview sessions, the collected data were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative conventional content analysis [19]. Coding was used from the first interviews and tested and revised through analysis of succeeding interviews.

Data analysis was inductive. Repeated reading of the extracted codes helped us identify the similarities and differences of textual data, and classify and organize them. Through careful inspection and continuous and advanced data comparison, categories emerged by inductive reasoning [17, 45]. Extracted codes were managed via MAXQDA 10 software.

The researchers were committed to Lincoln and Guba’s four main criteria in a qualitative approach [22].

Two researchers coded the interviews independently. Only one member of the research team did data analysis to enhance interviewer consistency and reliability. The codes were reviewed and discussed in several sessions by all researchers. The researchers tried to obtain an overall sense of the implication of each interview. The results were member checked, and participants confirmed the codes. The results were discussed, and the research team agreed upon all revisions.

The interviews continued until no new information was gained, and then two interviews were done. At this time, the data were considered to be saturated.

Ethical consideration

This study was performed under the Declaration of Helsinki. Written and oral consent was obtained from all participants, and the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the study (Ethic’s Code: IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1395.914).


Evaluating family members’ knowledge about patients’ sexual health is reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Evaluating family members’ knowledge about patients’ sexual health

We found three subcategories:

  1. a

    Informal sources for knowledge acquisition

The findings represent the family members’ resources to obtain information about sexual issues in patients with mental illness are usually informal The codes are: ‘acquaintances’, ‘family members of another patient’, ‘the media’, and ‘informal social activists’ networks’.

Some of the statements are:

'I was talking to other families. There was a mother who was worried about the future of her son. She asked me to introduce someone to take care of her son (she looking for a wife for her son)' (A 49-year-old sister).

'We should mention the role of the media and the internet. Sometimes, families get information about sexual issues through searches on websites or virtual networks' (A 49-year-old clinician).

'Patients may have virtual friends. Family members should be aware of it. They should help the patients in making decisions in their relationships. Furthermore, patients can search for everything by using the internet. Some of this information is incorrect, and some may be exaggerated. Family members should transfer this information to the clinicians. Clinicians can correct the incorrect beliefs' (A 55-year-old GP).

  1. b

    Common myths

This subcategory reflects some common incorrect beliefs of families which are actually exist in general population in our society The codes are:

‘The lack of sexual needs in patients’, ‘feasibility of lifelong abstinence’, ‘restriction the only way of sexual health’, and ‘marriage as a treatment for mental illness’.

Some of the statements are:

The attitude of parents has a major role. They may ignore the patients’ sexual need’ (A 42-year-old psychiatrist). Moreover, a father told although my son is a patient but he is really pious so could control his sexual needs (A 51-year-old father).

Sometimes family members believe that marriage is a treatment for mental illness’ (A 45-year-old nurse). One of the participants told us, marriage could improve her son’s disorder, especially with satisfying his sexual needs. (A 49-year-old sister).

‘Some families believe that the only solution for maintaining sexual health in their relatives is to restrict them, (A 65-year-old psychiatrist). Additionally, a mother told us that she knows her daughter has sexual needs but she must learn control herself completely (A 50-year-old mother). Moreover, some families are worried about giving sex education to the patients. For example, a mother told us that her daughter knows nothing about sexual issues and talking with her causes sexual concern (A 50-year-old mother).

  1. iii

    Inappropriate reaction to the patients’ needs

This subcategory suggests that some family members may present some inappropriate reactions when faced with a patient’s sexual issues. The codes are:

Considering the patient as incompetent’, and ‘need to over-involvement and overprotection’. ‘Not considering transient sexual relationship as a risky behavior’.

Following, one of the clinician’s statements is presented:

In the remission phase, patients can manage their sexual needs. Patients need to be equipped with appropriate skills. Skills training should be provided in a persistent manner’ although, most of the families think that the patients are completely incompetent to manage their sexual behaviors (A 55-year-old GP).

'In the remission phase, we should provide services such as booster educational sessions and address sexual issues' (A 65-year-old psychologist).

'Family members are worried about their loved one. So, they may become more controlling or overprotective. This approach may build a high emotional expression environment' (A 37-year-old patient).

'My Mother had an inappropriate reaction when I mentioned my sexual problems, she overprotects me and it is not acceptable' (A 37-year-old patient).

Also, 'Some family members believe that having transient sexual relationship especially in male patients could be considered as a solution for patients' sexual needs. They do not consider it as a risky behavior' (A 55-year-old GP).

Finally, sometimes patients want to talk with one of the family members about their sexual concerns so the families should be educated in this regard. For example, they might become frustrated because of sexual dysfunction and they need to be assured that they can share their emotions with family members’ (A 65-year-old psychologist).


In this qualitative study that aimed to explain the knowledge of SMI’s family about sexual health, three main categories were emerged. “Selecting an informal source for knowledge acquisition” explain that SMI’s family does not refer to reliable scientific sources for obtaining sexual information or these sources are not readily available to them. “Believing in common myths” explains that there are common misconceptions in SMI’s families, such as they do not have sexual needs, they should abstain completely over the life, marriage is a treatment for psychiatric illness or transient sexual relation is not risky. “Inappropriate reaction to the patients’ needs” explains that when patients’ families encounter the patient’s sexual issues, they react emotionally and irrationally, such as blaming them or trying to over-care or control them.

Although most studies have emphasized the importance of sex education in SMI, the role of families should be clarified in more details. This study has conducted in Iran, a developing country which is located in Middle East with a collectivistic and Islamic culture, and relatively poor social welfare and weak systematic social support. Therefore, it is obvious that in this society how prominent the role of SMI’s families could be in managing the patients. Family members usually experience a high amount of burden [9] and stigma according to caring for the patients [2, 44].

Families may feel ashamed to talk about patients’ sexual issues with clinicians. On the other hand, clinicians also may feel uncomfortable and unequipped in sexual history taking. These feelings in families and clinicians may lead to ignore the sexual issues in patients [5, 30]. Therefore, education about clinicians and SMIs’ families role in improving patient’s sexual health is necessary (Eddie [26]; Edward [27, 28, 30]).

In societies that families are mostly accountable for SMIs’ care, the impact of their attitudes and actions on patients’ sexual health is very high [29, 37]. In one hand, there is no systematic sexual health education even for general population in most Islamic country including Iran, and on the other hand general knowledge of SMIs’ family for taking care of patients and themselves is negligible in middle east [2]. This fact is in line with our findings that SMIs’ family get necessary information from unreliable and informal sources. Therefore, a two way movement should take place to change the condition. Up down attitude about the necessity of sexual health education should be upgraded and bottom up request for such education should be stimulated. This bidirectional movement is highly important for SMIs’ families [2, 41]. In addition of receiving information and advice from health care providers, SMIs’ families need more support from other resources to reduce the burden [42].

Therefore, family education is recommended to improve sexual health outcomes in patients with SMI [13]. Clinicians should correct common myths in family education sessions. Although SMI patients need to be supported, family members should be aware of the possibility of lapse in over-controlling and negative consequence of high emotional expression [3]. In the family members view, the patient may consider incompetent. This attitude may create overprotection and create a negative emotional atmosphere [3]. As a result, these patients may experience stigma and discrimination [11]. Family members are in close contact with the patients. They should accept the mental illness in their loved ones, but being a psychiatric patient is not synonymous with incompetence. These patients are interested to learn about sexual health [20]. Although they may lose some of their skills and capabilities, they should be educated about sexual issues [7] (Edward [27]). They can manage sexual issues in remission periods.

Family members should be aware of the risk of STDs, AIDS, and unwanted pregnancies. Although some patients should be supervised by families, it is necessary to be aware of the negative consequence of high emotional expression. Authors suggest that a good relationship between the patient and families and a sense of trust can reduce family concerns. An atmosphere in which the patient feels secure and comfortable to talk about sexual concerns; and find his/her family member, a good listener.

Implications in the practice

Mental health care providers, including nurses, General Practitioners, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists should be trained to assess the sexual health needs of these patients alongside asking family members about their concerns. Family education about patients’ sexuality, should be integrated into a comprehensive rehabilitation program.

The authors suggest that according to cultural issues in, family engagement is helpful to assess patients’ sexual health. The results highlighted the importance of sex education for families and the necessary topics. The authors recommend planning for adding a sex education component to the whole package of family psycho-education for SMI patients. Therefore, family education is recommended to improve sexual health outcomes in patients with SMI [13]. Clinicians should correct common myths and misbeliefs in family education sessions.

Family members should be aware of the risk of STDs, AIDS, and unwanted pregnancies. Although some patients should be supervised by families, it is necessary to be aware of the negative consequence of high emotional expression.

Authors suggest that a good relationship between the patient and families and a sense of trust can reduce family concerns. An atmosphere in which the patient feels secure and comfortable to talk about sexual concerns; and find his/her family member, a good listener.


The patients and family members were selected from the clients of Roozbeh Day Centre using purposive sampling. Roozbeh Hospital is a tertiary center located in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, and the patients and families referred to this center might not representative of all peers. Although we emphasized confidentiality before starting the interviews, it is probable that some participants have not feel comfortable disclosing their experiences according to the sensitivity of the topic.

Recommendation for future research

Evaluation of the effect of family sexual health education in reducing family burden, promoting communication with the patients and reducing sexual risk behaviors is recommended for future research.


Clinicians should be aware of the sexual needs of these patients. They should ask about sexual health concerns from the patients and their families. They should correct the incorrect beliefs of family members, and recommend accessible resources to learn about the sexual issues in these patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality of the patients and their interviews but are available from the corresponding author on request.


  1. Ahari SB, Moghadam ZB, Azin SA, Maasoumi R. Concerns and educational needs of Iranian parents regarding the sexual health of their male adolescents: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alyafei AH, Alqunaibet T, Mansour H, Ali A, Billings J. The experiences of family caregivers of people with severe mental illness in the Middle East: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Amaresha AC, Venkatasubramanian G. Expressed emotion in schizophrenia: an overview. Indian J Psychol Med. 2012;34(1):12–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonfils KA, Firmin RL, Salyers MP, Wright ER. Sexuality and intimacy among people living with serious mental illnesses: factors contributing to sexual activity. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015;38(3):249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown B. Essays and Debates in Mental Health. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23:338–43.

  6. Caqueo-Urízar A, Rus-Calafell M, Urzúa A, Escudero J, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J. The role of family therapy in the management of schizophrenia: challenges and solutions. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:145.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Correa AMP, Carrillo RAA, Vega DCS, Cano SG, Arango LGA, Builes LFT, et al. Sexual and reproductive health in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Rev Colomb Psiquiatría (English ed). 2020;49(1):15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Hert M, Correll CU, Bobes J, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Cohen D, Asai I, et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(1):52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebrahimi H, Seyedfatemi N, Namdar Areshtanab H, Ranjbar F, Thornicroft G, Whitehead B, et al. Barriers to family caregivers’ coping with patients with severe mental illness in Iran. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(6):987–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gebeyehu DA, Mulatie M. Risky sexual behavior and its associated factors among patients with severe mental disorder in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2018. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. González-Torres MA, Oraa R, Arístegui M, Fernández-Rivas A, Guimon J. Stigma and discrimination towards people with schizophrenia and their family members. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(1):14–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon CM, Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA, Weinhardt LS. Understanding HIV-related risk among persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: insights from qualitative inquiry. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999;187(4):208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gowen, L. K. (2011). How mental health challenges impact the sexual and relational health of young adults. Focal point: youth, young adults, & mental health. Healthy Relationships.

  14. Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education. In: Banner P, Johnson B, editors. Kindergarten-12th Grade. 3rd ed. Fulton Press; 2004.

  15. Hestmark L, Romøren M, Heiervang KS, Weimand B, Ruud T, Norvoll R, et al. Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins A, Barker P, Begley C. Sexual health education for people with mental health problems: what can we learn from the literature? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006;13(6):687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holley RP. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Portal Libr Acad. 2009;9(4):517–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hortal-Mas R, Moreno-Poyato AR, Granel-Giménez N, Roviralta-Vilella M, Watson-Badia C, Gómez-Ibáñez R, Aguayo-González MP, Giménez-Díez D, Bernabeu-Tamayo MD, Leyva-Moral JM. Sexuality in people living with a serious mental illness: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022;29(1):130–46. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

  19. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes E, Mitchell N, Gascoyne S, Moe-Byrne T, Edmondson A, Coleman E, et al. The RESPECT study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a sexual health promotion intervention for people with serious mental illness in community mental health services in the UK. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kismödi E, Corona E, Maticka-Tyndale E, Rubio-Aurioles E, Coleman E. Sexual rights as human rights: a guide for the WAS declaration of sexual rights. Int J Sex Health. 2017;29(sup1):1–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lietz CA, Langer CL, Furman R. Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qual Soc Work. 2006;5(4):441–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundberg P, Johansson E, Okello E, Allebeck P, Thorson A. Sexual risk behaviours and sexual abuse in persons with severe mental illness in Uganda: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Matevosyan NR. Reproductive health in women with serious mental illnesses: a review. Sex Disabil. 2009;27(2):109–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattelmaki T. Design probes, Publication Series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki A 69. 2006.

  26. McCann E. Exploring sexual and relationship possibilities for people with psychosis–a review of the literature. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003;10(6):640–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McCann E, Donohue G, de Jager J, Nugter A, Stewart J, Eustace-Cook J. Sexuality and intimacy among people with serious mental illness: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Evid Synthes. 2019;17(1):74–125.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McClure L. Where is the sex in mental health practice? A discussion of sexuality care needs of mental health clients. J Ethics Mental Health. 2012;7:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mottaghipour Y, Pourmand D, Maleki H, Davidian L. Expressed emotion and the course of schizophrenia in Iran. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001;36(4):195–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Osborne M. HCAs' views on sexual health in people with severe mental illness. Nurs Times. 2019;115(1):25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pandor A, Kaltenthaler E, Higgins A, Lorimer K, Smith S, Wylie K, et al. Sexual health risk reduction interventions for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perry BL, Wright ER. The sexual partnerships of people with serious mental illness. J Sex Res. 2006;43(2):174–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Persson TJ, Drury KM, Gluch E, Wiviott G. Sex education groups in a psychiatric day hospital: clinical observations. J Sex Marit Ther. 2016;42(1):18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Raisi F, Yahyavi S, Mirsepassi Z, Firoozikhojastefar R, Shahvari Z. Neglected sexual needs: a qualitative study in Iranian patients with severe mental illness. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2018;54(4):488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Randolph ME, Pinkerton SD, Somlai AM, Kelly JA, McAuliffe TL, Gibson RH, et al. Seriously mentally ill women’s safer sex behaviors and the theory of reasoned action. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36(5):948–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson E, Rodgers B, Butterworth P. Family relationships and mental illness: impacts and service responses; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sadeniemi M, Almeda N, Salinas-Pérez JA. A Comparison of Mental Health Care Systems in Northern and Southern Europe: a service mapping study. 2018;15(6).

  38. Senn TE, Carey MP. HIV, STD, and sexual risk reduction for individuals with a severe mental illness: review of the intervention literature. Curr Psychiatr Rev. 2008;4(2):87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shahvari Z, Raisi F, Firoozi Khojastefar R, Yahyavi S, Mirsepassi Z. Memos on sexuality education effectiveness; a qualitative study in severe mental illness in Iran. Int J Sex Health. 2020;32(3):254–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sjöström N, Waern M, Johansson A, Weimand B, Johansson O, Ewertzon M. Relatives’ experiences of mental health care, family burden and family stigma: does participation in patient-appointed resource group assertive community treatment (RACT) make a difference? Issues Mental Health Nurs. 2021:1–10.

  41. Verity F, Turiho A, Mutamba B, Cappo D. Family care for persons with severe mental illness: experiences and perspectives of caregivers in Uganda. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2021;15(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vermeulen B, Lauwers H, Spruytte N, Van Audenhove C. Experiences of family caregivers for persons with severe mental illness: an international exploration; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wright ER, Gayman M. Sexual networks and HIV risk of people with severe mental illness in institutional and community-based care. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(3):341–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yin M, Li Z, Zhou C. Experience of stigma among family members of people with severe mental illness: a qualitative systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020;29(2):141–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Y, Wildemuth BM. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2009;35:159–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the participants of this study who generously shared their private issues with us.


This project is supported by a grant from the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Project’s Code: 95–01–30-30697).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All Authors conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. FR and ZS designed the study. ZM, FR, STY and ZS derived the research questions and conducted the qualitative analysis. ZM and FR author wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firoozeh Raisi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1395.914). All Interviews were performed according to Lincoln and Guba’s four main criteria in a qualitative approach.

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before inclusion into the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirsepassi, Z., Raisi, F., Shahvari, Z. et al. Evaluating family knowledge about sexual health in patients with severe mental illness: a qualitative study in Iran. BMC Psychiatry 22, 174 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: