Skip to main content
Download PDF

An analysis of views about supported reduction or discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment among people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 185 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Antipsychotic medication can reduce psychotic symptoms and risk of relapse in people with schizophrenia and related disorders, but it is not always effective and adverse effects can be significant. We know little of patients’ views about continuing or discontinuing antipsychotic treatment.

Aims

To explore the views of people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders about continuing their antipsychotic medication or attempting to reduce or discontinue this medication with clinical support.

Methods

We collected quantitative and qualitative data by conducting semi-structured interviews in London, UK. Factors predicting a desire to discontinue medication were explored. Content analysis of qualitative data was undertaken.

Results

We interviewed 269 participants. 33% (95% CI, 27 to 39%) were content with taking long-term antipsychotic medication. Others reported they took it reluctantly (19%), accepted it on a temporary basis (24%) or actively disliked it (18%). 31% (95% CI, 25 to 37%) said they would like to try to stop medication with professional support, and 45% (95% CI, 39 to 51%) wanted the opportunity to reduce medication. People who wanted to discontinue had more negative attitudes towards the medication but were otherwise similar to other participants. Wanting to stop or reduce medication was motivated mainly by adverse effects and health concerns. Professional support was identified as potentially helpful to achieve reduction.

Conclusions

This large study reveals that patients are commonly unhappy about the idea of taking antipsychotics on a continuing or life-long basis. Professional support for people who want to try to reduce or stop medication is valued.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Antipsychotic medication is considered the primary treatment for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and related disorders across the world [1,2,3,4]. It is effective in reducing acute symptoms [5] and long-term antipsychotic medication is recommended for people with recurrent episodes on the basis of evidence that continuous antipsychotic treatment reduces the risk of relapse compared to discontinuation [6, 7]. However, the adverse effects of these drugs are often serious and disabling, including diabetes, tardive dyskinesia, heart disease, sedation, emotional blunting, akathisia and sexual dysfunction [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In addition, the beneficial effects of long-term treatment may have been over-estimated given that most previous studies have compared maintenance antipsychotic treatment to abrupt discontinuation without controlling for the impact of withdrawal effects (which are more likely following abrupt discontinuation) [14,15,16,17].

Studies of the long-term outcomes of naturalistic, non-randomised cohorts give conflicting results about the benefits of maintenance antipsychotic treatment, with some suggesting it improves outcomes [18] and some reporting that people who avoid long-term treatment do better [19,20,21]. Few randomised trials have followed people up for more than a few months, and evidence from such studies suggests that the impact of discontinuation lessens over time [6]. Two randomised trials report results of a long-term follow-up involving people with a first episode of psychosis. One included people in stable remission (remission for 6 months) and found that gradual antipsychotic reduction had beneficial effects on social functioning in the long-term [22]. The other reported that a more abrupt process of discontinuation had detrimental effects [23], with early psychotic relapse linked to poorer outcomes [24]. However, a composite outcome and inclusion of some data from the end of the original trial may have influenced results, and no difference was observed in symptom levels or functioning [25]. Several authors have since discussed reasons for the uncertainty of current evidence on the implications of antipsychotic discontinuation, including a lack of understanding of patients’ perspectives and limitations in study design [26]. There are no data from randomised trials of long-term outcomes following antipsychotic discontinuation among people with recurrent episodes.

The balance between the benefits and harms of long-term antipsychotic treatment requires careful consideration, therefore. Studies that describe people’s experiences of taking antipsychotics, highlight both positive and negative aspects of using medication, and also reveal the complexity of weighing up the pros and cons of drug treatment when making decisions about medication use [11, 13, 27]. Some patients report a lack of involvement in decisions about their treatment and, specifically that requests to reduce or discontinue medication are often not supported [28, 29]. These factors may be related to the low adherence rates amongst patients with schizophrenia [30, 31], which are linked to increased risk of relapse and rehospitalisation [32]. These consequences may result from people stopping medication abruptly without clinical supervision, which may increase withdrawal-related adverse effects including ‘supersensitivity’ psychosis and withdrawal-induced relapse [33, 34]. Despite this, there has been little research that focuses on people’s views about stopping medication. We aimed to explore the views of people with diagnoses of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders towards taking antipsychotics on a long-term basis, and attitudes towards reducing or stopping these drugs with clinical support. We also aimed to explore the characteristics of people who want to discontinue antipsychotic medication compared to those who do not.

Methods

Study design

We conducted face-to-face interviews with people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum condition using a combination of structured and open-ended questions. The study was also designed to elicit people’s views on taking part in an ongoing randomised trial of supported antipsychotic reduction [35].

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was provided by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (Research Ethics Committee reference: 15/ES/0163).

Participants

Inclusion criteria consisted of: 1) a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder or other psychotic disorder (excluding bipolar disorder and psychotic depression) as recorded in participants medical notes; 2) a history of either more than one episode of psychosis or schizophrenia, or a single episode that lasted more than a year, 3) taking antipsychotics; 4) being stable for a period of at least 3 months (e.g. not requiring acute care by the crisis team or inpatient unit). Exclusion criteria consisted of; 1) lack of capacity to consent to the research; 2) being legally compelled to take antipsychotic medication; 3) the potential to present a serious risk of harm to self or others in the view of a treating clinician; 4) inability to speak or comprehend spoken English such that an interpreter is required.

Setting

Participants were recruited from community mental health services and primary care practices across areas of London between April 2016 and August 2017.

In both settings, clinical staff were asked to identify patients meeting eligibility criteria, as far as these could be assessed using clinical records and clinician’s knowledge. Clinical staff then contacted the patients identified either in person or by letter. They explained the study and asked patients if they were willing to be contacted by the research team to receive further information. A researcher then contacted willing participants to arrange a face-to-face interview at a convenient location.

Data collection

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to conducting the interview. Participants were reimbursed for their time and travel expenses. Trained researchers administered a pre-designed interview schedule, including open and closed questions. The interviews were typically between 30 and 60 min in duration. Participants were given the opportunity to respond to an open question first and then presented with a series of fixed-format, mutually exclusive options and asked to decide (in discussion with the researcher if necessary) which one best captured their views (see Additional file 1 for details of questions).

The schedule was developed based on previous literature and in collaboration with a panel of service users and carers. Participants were also asked to complete the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) [36]. The DAI is a 10-item inventory that assesses attitudes towards taking medication for mental health problems and is scored between plus 10 (positive attitude) and − 10 (negative attitude). Parts of the interview including the open questions were audio-recorded with the participant’s consent, and if consent was not given to audio-record, written notes were made.

Analysis

We conducted quantitative analyses using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 25.0) [37]. A pre-planned analysis was conducted to explore factors associated with wanting to stop antipsychotic medication versus not wanting to, or feeling ambivalent. The following plausible explanatory variables were selected and explored using univariate analyses: age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, employment, duration of treatment, antipsychotic dose and form of antipsychotic (depot versus oral). A confirmatory logistic regression analysis was performed.

Qualitative data from open questions were analysed using content analysis in order to identify data that would help clarify responses to quantitative questions, particularly the reasons people gave for their responses. Content analysis is a broad technique that aims to provide ‘a systematic and objective means to make valid inferences from verbal, visual, or written data in order to describe and quantify specific phenomena’ [38]. We used the ‘directed approach’ as set out by Hsieh and Shannon [39] in which knowledge from previous research was used to guide the initial formulation of categories. Data from audio-recordings and written notes were entered into NVivo software (version 11) to facilitate analysis. Initially, seven members of the research team listened to five randomly selected interview recordings to develop an initial set of categories. These were reviewed by the research team, refined, and then a further five interviews were analysed using these refined categories. Categories were subsequently reviewed again and collapsed, divided or further refined in order to produce a set of categories that were conceptually clear, distinct from each other, and were named appropriately to reflect content. These finalized categories were used to analyze the complete data set. Analysis was reviewed for accuracy by two researchers (NC and JT), and the research team met regularly during this process to review uncertainties about how to categorise data, which were resolved by discussion and consensus.

Results

Sample characteristics

People were screened for the study from a total of 29 clinical teams across four mental health organisations. Participants were also recruited from 18 primary care practices. A total of 269 patients consented to take part. Characteristics of the sample are reported in Table 1. The mean age of the sample was 46 years (SD = 11.50), 65% (175/269) were male and 52% (137/266) identified as white British or other white background. Most participants were single (67%; 176/264), living alone (66%; 174/262) and unemployed (70%; 187/266).

Table 1 Participant characteristics
Full size table

Nearly all participants had a diagnosis of either schizophrenia (70%; 188/267) or schizoaffective disorder (18%; 47/267). Most were recruited through secondary mental health services (85%; 228/269), mainly from community mental health teams. Fifteen per cent were recruited through primary care services. The majority of participants had long term involvement with services, with 36% (95/267) of participants reporting being in contact with mental health services for more than 20 years.

The mean length of time taking antipsychotic medications was 16.5 years (SD = 10.31). Most patients (84%; 222/264) were taking only one antipsychotic medication at the time of the interview. In total, 69% (183/265) were taking a second generation antipsychotic (including clozapine), and 50% (133/264) were prescribed a long-acting antipsychotic depot injection.

Views of continuing, discontinuing or reducing antipsychotic medication

Answers to closed questions revealed that one third (87/265; 33%; 95% CI, 27 to 39) were content to take antipsychotic medication on a long-term basis. A further 19 % (51/265; 95% CI, 15 to 25) accepted it reluctantly. Eighteen percent (47/265; 95% CI, 13 to 23) of participants reported that they were not satisfied taking antipsychotic medication long-term and another 24% (64/265; 95% CI, 19 to 30) accepted taking it for the present but not necessarily forever.

When asked their views about the possibility of discontinuing antipsychotic medication with professional support and supervision, almost a third of patients (82/266; 31%, 95% CI, 25 to 37) reported that they would definitely like to do this, with a further 21% (55/266; 95% CI, 16 to 26) reporting that they had some concerns but would be willing to try. Twenty-one percent (57/266; 95% CI, 17 to 27) wanted to try to discontinue medication in the future, but not at the present moment. Twenty-five percent (66/266; 95% CI, 20 to 31) of patients reported that they did not want to stop their antipsychotic medication.

When asked how they would feel about the possibility of reducing antipsychotic medication with professional support, almost half the participants (118/262; 45%; 95% CI, 39 to 51) reported that they would definitely like to reduce their medication and 13% (35/262; 95% CI, 10 to 18) reported that they would be willing to try to reduce. Fourteen per cent (36/262; 95% CI, 10 to 19) wanted to reduce medication in the future but not at present. Twenty one per cent (59/262; 95% CI, 18 to 28) reported that they would not want to reduce their antipsychotic medication now or in the future.

Table 2 shows the analysis of potential predictors of wanting to discontinue antipsychotic medication. Only DAI score showed a statistically significant association (t(237) = − 8.30; p < 0.001), with people with more negative attitudes towards taking medication being more likely to want to discontinue. Notably, no demographic factors, illness or treatment characteristics were associated with wanting to discontinue medication and neither was coming from primary or secondary care services. Multivariable analysis (not shown) confirmed that DAI was the only statistically significant predictor of wanting to discontinue medication.

Table 2 Potential predictors of wanting to discontinue antipsychotic medication
Full size table

Content analysis

In total, interviews from 267 participants were analysed including 204 audio recordings and 63 written notes (no notes were made for two of the unrecorded interviews because they were stopped prematurely by the participant). A total of 132 participants provided reasons why they valued or accepted continuing antipsychotic medication (Table 3). The most common reason was fear of relapse, with 70% of the 132 participants citing this. Other common reasons included the view that antipsychotic medication helps to maintain stability or produce a general improvement, that it reduces positive symptoms, particularly hallucinations, the sedative or calming effects of antipsychotics, and the reduction of other symptoms such as agitation and suicidal thoughts. A total of 24% of the 132 participants said that they took antipsychotics because doctors told them to take it.

Table 3 Content analysis of participant views about taking antipsychotics on a long-term basis, and attitudes towards reducing or stopping
Full size table

A total of 121 participants provided data on reasons for wanting to reduce or discontinue antipsychotics. A total of 90 of the 121 participants (74%) cited concerns about the adverse effects of antipsychotic medication and/or its actual and potential impact on their physical health. The most commonly cited specific adverse effects included sedative effects, weight gain and neurological effects (such as shaking, twitching, stiffness, etc). Impairment of general functioning, cognitive and emotional capacities and sexual functioning were also mentioned. Some respondents felt they no longer needed medication, and others simply disliked the idea of taking medication long-term.

A total of 61 participants provided responses that described what they thought would be helpful if they were to consider reducing or discontinuing antipsychotics. Support from psychiatrists and other professionals was most commonly mentioned. Reducing medication gradually and being in a stable situation or having a ‘healthy lifestyle’ at the time of reduction (e.g. being in employment or having a good diet), were considered important by some participants (40%; 24 of 61). Several people (16%; 10 out of 61) reported that the aspiration to be independent or obtain employment was a significant motivation for trying to reduce or stop antipsychotics and might help them to reduce or discontinue medication successfully. Access to a supply of medication to take ‘as required,’ family support, psychological therapy and alternative therapies were mentioned as being potentially useful by some participants (16%; 10 out of 61).

Discussion

Main findings

When asked about long-term antipsychotic medication, only a third of participants in this large survey said they were satisfied taking it, whilst others reported that they took it reluctantly, accepted it on a temporary basis or actively disliked it. A third said they would like to try to stop medication with professional support, and almost half wanted the opportunity to reduce medication. Many others were more tentative, but still wanted to try and reduce or discontinue medication, or said they would like to do so in the future. Apart from having more negative attitudes towards medication, which mirrors other research on reasons that people discontinue antipsychotic medication [40], no other characteristics distinguished those who wanted to try and stop medication from others who did not or who felt more ambivalent. The fact that a third of participants were unhappy with the idea of continuing treatment indefinitely is consistent with qualitative research, suggesting that long-term antipsychotic use is often accepted ambivalently as ‘the least worst option’ [11, 13, 29], and with quantitative research that found that 27% of patients with schizophrenia felt their medication had done “more harm than good” [12].

The main reason people valued long-term antipsychotic treatment was for preventing relapse. Other reasons included reduction of positive symptoms, but people also valued antipsychotics for their sedating properties, which contrasts with the official purpose of the medication, but reflects first person accounts reported in qualitative studies [11, 13]. Some people reported taking antipsychotics simply because their doctor told them to. Wanting to stop or reduce medication was motivated by concerns about adverse effects, particularly sedative effects, neurological effects and weight gain, and concerns about antipsychotics’ effects on physical health and functioning, consistent with other research on people’s views about antipsychotic medication [11, 13, 41,42,43]. Some people felt they no longer needed medication or were curious to know whether they could manage without it, which has also been found in research on reasons for non-adherence [41, 44]. Support from healthcare professionals was identified as being helpful in attempting to reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication, as was gradual reduction (cited by 25% of patients). This coincides with recent literature on the importance of gradual tapering when reducing or stopping antipsychotic medication to minimise the risk of relapse [45]. Wanting to be independent was regarded as an important motivation for trying to reduce or stop medication.

Strengths and limitations

With 269 participants, the current study is the largest survey of what people think about continuing or discontinuing antipsychotic medication. The sample was recruited from clinical services, but responses are not necessarily generalizable to the general population of patients who fulfil the eligibility criteria. Although we attempted to make selection as systematic as possible by screening clinical caseloads, inevitably clinical staff influenced who was put forward. This is also likely since the study was linked to a future randomised trial of antipsychotic reduction. People who consent to take part in research may be more adherent and accepting of treatment than other patients [46]; on the other hand, the current study may have appealed to people with more negative views about taking antipsychotic medication. Although not all interviewers were connected to the planned trial, some were, and hence were likely to be committed to the principle that antipsychotic reduction is a viable treatment option. This may have influenced the manner in which questions were presented.

People with long histories of medication use and service contact made up the majority of the sample, which may also have biased responses towards more acceptance of medication. This might also account for the relatively high proportion of patients taking first generation antipsychotics within this study. Therefore, we are not able to produce estimates of the overall rates of different attitudes among our target population, and people with shorter histories are particularly under-represented. The analysis of associations with wanting to discontinue medication could potentially have involved many explanatory variables and been subject to false positive findings. However, the negative association between wanting to discontinue and general attitudes towards antipsychotics is highly plausible.

Content analysis allows a large amount of qualitative data to be converted into numerical form, but categorisation of responses inevitably obscures some of the nuances and complexity of the original responses and does not provide the depth of thematic analysis.

Interpretation and implications

Qualitative research shows how people who take antipsychotics engage in a sophisticated process of weighing up the pros and cons of treatment based on a variety of considerations including how the drugs influence symptoms and their impact on quality of life and ability to function [13, 29]. In line with previous studies [29], our results suggest that many people take antipsychotic medication reluctantly either because they fear the consequences of stopping or because they accept what their doctor tells them to do. Although the majority do not actively want to change their treatment, a significant minority would like the opportunity to try and reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication with professional support. They are often motivated by the experience of adverse effects and reasonable concerns about their physical health. Yet, as other research indicates, patients often report that they lack the opportunity to make collaborative decisions about taking antipsychotic medication, and support to try to reduce or discontinue this medication is rarely available [28, 29]. Clinicians can be reluctant to help people reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication because they are focused on risk, and lack training and official guidance on how best to do this [47]. This is a concern since patients may sense this reluctance, and may reduce or stop medication without sharing this with their psychiatrists [28]. If done abruptly, this may increase the risk of relapse and significant withdrawal effects [14, 33].

Mental health services need to support informed decision-making and patient choice, and to this end services should provide support for patients who wish to try to reduce or discontinue antipsychotics. However, there is a need for guidance on the best approach; current evidence suggests any reduction should be gradual and individualised to each patient to minimize risk of relapse [45, 48]. Routine discussions with long-term patients may reveal people who are dissatisfied with their current treatment for a variety of understandable reasons that are important to explore. Some people who stop medication abruptly and potentially dangerously on their own might cooperate with a planned strategy of supervised reduction conducted in collaboration with their psychiatrist. Yet other patients may wish to switch to a different medication to lessen the impact of specific adverse effects [49].

Further research is required to clarify what patients want and how it might best be offered within mental health services. More research is required on people who have a shorter history, and qualitative work could help to explore patient attitudes in more depth including across different sub-groups (e.g. ethnicity). Identifying the best ways to support people who wish to discontinue antipsychotics is important to alleviate the risks involved. Previous studies of services or novel interventions that aim to minimise antipsychotic use, or encourage greater user choice about medication may provide pointers towards interventions that are evidenced-based and helpful when people are reducing and stopping medication [50,51,52].

Conclusion

Many patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or related disorders from community mental health services are unhappy about the idea of taking medication on a continuing or life-long basis, and would like to try reducing or discontinuing their medication at some point. Professional support was identified as important in achieving this. Guidance on how to support people to make informed decisions about long-term antipsychotic treatment, and to reduce or discontinue if they wish, would increase the options that are available to patients who are taking long-term antipsychotics.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to confidentiality reasons and data protection regulations, but are available from the corresponding author, NC, upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DAI:

Drug Attitude Inventory

LEAP:

Lived Experience Advisory Panel

NIHR:

National Institute for Health Research

RADAR:

Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

References

  1. Lehman AF, Lieberman JA, Dixon LB, McGlashan TH, Miller AL, Perkins DO, et al. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, second edition. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2):1-56.

  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: treatment and management. London: NICE; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keepers GA, Fochtmann LJ, Anzia JM, Benjamin S, Lyness JM, Mojtabai R, et al. The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177(9):868–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimomura Y, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki T, Uchida H, Mimura M, Takeuchi H. Antipsychotic treatment in the maintenance phase of schizophrenia: an updated systematic review of the guidelines and algorithms. Schizophr Res. 2020;215:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leucht S, Leucht C, Huhn M, Chaimani A, Mavridis D, Helfer B, et al. Sixty years of placebo-controlled antipsychotic drug trials in acute schizophrenia: systematic review, Bayesian Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of efficacy predictors. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(10):927–42. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leucht S, Tardy M, Komossa K, Heres S, Kissling W, Davis JM. Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;16(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008016.pub2.

  7. Zipursky RB, Odejayi G, Agid O, Remington G. You say “schizophrenia” and I say “psychosis”: just tell me when I can come off this medication. Schizophr Res. 2020;225:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckley NA, Sanders P. Cardiovascular adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs. Drug Saf. 2000;23:215–28. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200023030-00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moncrieff J, Cohen D, Mason JP. The subjective experience of taking antipsychotic medication: a content analysis of internet data. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;120:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01356.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajkumar AP, Horsdal HT, Wimberley T, Cohen D, Mors O, Borglum AD, et al. Endogenous and antipsychotic-related risks for diabetes mellitus in young people with schizophrenia: a Danish population-based cohort study. Am J Psychiatr. 2017;174(7):686–94. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16040442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bjornestad J, Lavik KO, Davidson L, Hjeltnes A, Moltu C, Veseth M. Antipsychotic treatment – a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of qualitative studies. J Ment Health. 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1581352.

  12. Doane MJ, Sajatovic M, Weiden PJ, O’sullivan AK, Maher S, Bjorner JB, et al. Antipsychotic treatment experiences of people with schizophrenia: patient perspectives from an online survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:2043. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s270020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson J, Stansfeld JL, Cooper RE, Morant N, Crellin NE, Moncrieff J. Experiences of taking neuroleptic medication and impacts on symptoms, sense of self and agency: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative data. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(2):151–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01819-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Viguera A, Baldessarini R, Hegarty J, van Kammen D, Tohen M. Clinical risk following abrupt and gradual withdrawal of maintenance neuroleptic treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830130055011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Osborn DPJ, Levy G, Nazareth I, Petersen I, Islam A, King MB. Relative risk of cardiovascular and Cancer mortality in people with severe mental illness from the United Kingdom’s general practice research database. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cerovecki A, Musil R, Klimke A, Seemüller F, Haen E, Schennach R, et al. Withdrawal symptoms and rebound syndromes associated with switching and discontinuing atypical antipsychotics: theoretical background and practical recommendations. CNS Drugs. 2013;27(7):545–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-013-0079-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moncrieff J. Antipsychotic maintenance treatment: time to rethink? PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001861. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiihonen J, Tanskanen A, Taipale H. 20-year Nationwide follow-up study on discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(8):765–73. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17091001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrow M, Jobe TH, Faull RN. Does treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotic medications eliminate or reduce psychosis? A 20-year multi-follow-up study. Psychol Med. 2014;44(14):3007–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moilanen JM, Haapea M, Jääskeläinen E, Veijola JM, Isohanni MK, Koponen HJ, et al. Long-term antipsychotic use and its association with outcomes in schizophrenia – the northern Finland birth cohort 1966. Eur Psychiatry. 2016;36:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wils RS, Gotfredsen DR, Hjorthøj C, Austin SF, Albert N, Secher RG, et al. Antipsychotic medication and remission of psychotic symptoms 10 years after a first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2017;182:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wunderink L, Nieboer RM, Wiersma D, Sytema S, Nienhuis FJ. Recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: long-term follow-up of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:913. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hui CLM, Honer WG, Lee EHM, Chang WC, Chan SKW, Chen ESM, et al. Long-term effects of discontinuation from antipsychotic maintenance following first-episode schizophrenia and related disorders: a 10 year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:432–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30090-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zipursky RB, Agid O, Remington G. Improving outcomes in schizophrenia by preventing early relapses. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(5):384–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30124-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moncrieff J, Steingard S. A critical analysis of recent data on the long-term outcome of antipsychotic treatment. Psychol Med. 2019;19:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718003811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luykx JJ, Tiihonen J. Antipsychotic discontinuation: mind the patient and the real-world evidence. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(7):555–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00159-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Angermeyer MC, Löffler W, Müller P, Schulze B, Priebe S. Patients’ and relatives’ assessment of clozapine treatment. Psychol Med. 2001;31:509–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701003749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Geyt GL, Awenat Y, Tai S, Haddock G. Personal accounts of discontinuing neuroleptic medication for psychosis. Qual Health Res. 2017;27:559–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316634047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morant N, Azam K, Johnson S, Moncrieff J. The least worst option: user experiences of antipsychotic medication and lack of involvement in medication decisions in a UK community sample. J Ment Health. 2018;27:322–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1370637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lacro JP, Dunn LB, Dolder CR, Leckband SG, Jeste DV. Prevalence of and risk factors for medication nonadherence in patients with schizophrenia: a comprehensive review of recent literature. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(10):892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Valenstein M, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Myra Kim H, Lee TA, Blow FC. Antipsychotic adherence over time among patients receiving treatment for schizophrenia: a retrospective review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(10):1542–50. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v67n1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haddad PM, Brain C, Scott J. Nonadherence with antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: challenges and management strategies. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2014;23(5):43–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S42735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moncrieff J. Does antipsychotic withdrawal provoke psychosis? Review of the literature on rapid onset psychosis (supersensitivity psychosis) and withdrawal-related relapse. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00787.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chouinard G, Samaha AN, Chouinard VA, Peretti CS, Kanahara N, Takase M, et al. Antipsychotic-induced dopamine Supersensitivity psychosis: pharmacology, criteria, and therapy. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(4):189–219. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moncrieff J, Lewis G, Freemantle N, Johnson S, Barnes TRE, Morant N, et al. Randomised controlled trial of gradual antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation in people with schizophrenia and related disorders: the RADAR trial (research into antipsychotic discontinuation and reduction). BMJ Open. 2019;9:e030912. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med. 1983;13:177–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700050182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Corp IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Downe-Wambolt B. Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992;13:313–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2015:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

  40. Velligan DI, Roberts DL, Sierra C, Fredrick MM, Roach MJ. What patients with severe mental illness transitioning from hospital to community have to say about care and shared decision-making. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016;37(6):400–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2015.1132289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jónsdóttir H, Friis S, Horne R, Pettersen KI, Reikvam Å, Andreassen OA. Beliefs about medications: measurement and relationship to adherence in patients with severe mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01279.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bessonova L, Velligan DI, Weiden PJ, O’Sullivan AK, Yarlas A, Bayliss M. Antipsychotic treatment experiences of people with bipolar I disorder: patient perspectives from an online survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02767-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Doane MJ, Sajatovic M, Weiden PJ, O’sullivan AK, Maher S, Bjorner JB, et al. Antipsychotic treatment experiences of people with schizophrenia: patient perspectives from an online survey. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:2043. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s270020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Clatworthy J, Bowskill R, Parham R, Rank T, Scott J, Horne R. Understanding medication non-adherence in bipolar disorders using a necessity-concerns framework. J Affect Disord. 2009;116:51–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Horowitz MA, Jauhar S, Natesan S, Murray RM, Taylor D. A method for tapering antipsychotic treatment that may minimize the risk of relapse. Schizophr Bull. 2021;47(4):1116–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbab017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Horne R, Clatworthy J, Hankins M. On behalf of the ASCOT investigators. High adherence and concordance within a clinical trial of antihypertensives. Chronic Illn. 2010;6:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395310369018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cooper RE, Hanratty É, Morant N, Moncrieff J. Mental health professionals’ views and experiences of antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation. PLoS One. 2019a;14:e0218711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wunderink L. Personalizing antipsychotic treatment: evidence and thoughts on individualized tailoring of antipsychotic dosage in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Ther Advanc Psychopharmacol. 2019;9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125319836566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Newcomer JW, Weiden PJ, Buchanan RW. Switching antipsychotic medications to reduce adverse event burden in schizophrenia: establishing evidence-based practice. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(11):1108–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cooper RE, Laxhman N, Crellin N, Moncrieff J, Priebe S. Psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia or psychosis on minimal or no antipsychotic medication: a systematic review. Schizophr Res. 2019b;S0920996419301823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.05.020.

  51. Moncrieff J, Azam K, Johnson S, Marston L, Morant N, Darton K, et al. Results of a pilot cluster randomised trial of the use of a medication review tool for people taking antipsychotic medication. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0921-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ramon S, Morant N, Stead U, Perry B. Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: a mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017;63:763–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017733764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by North East London NHS Foundation Trust. The Research into Antipsychotic Discontinuation and Reduction (RADAR) research team acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, and Priment Clinical Trials Unit. The research team also thank the RADAR Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) for their support. The authors would also like to thank Zoe Haime, Georgina Buswell for their help with some of the analysis, and Éanna Hanratty for his support with data collection.

Funding

This article presents independent research funded by the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (project number: RP-PG-0514-20004). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research & Development Department, Goodmayes Hospital, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, IG3 8XJ, UK

    Nadia E. Crellin, Maria Long, Lisa Gruenwald, Jacki L. Stansfeld & Joanna Moncrieff

  2. Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7NF, UK

    Nadia E. Crellin, Nicola Morant, Glyn Lewis, Sonia Johnson, Maria Long, Lisa Gruenwald, Jacki L. Stansfeld & Joanna Moncrieff

  3. Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK

    Stefan Priebe & Ruth E. Cooper

  4. Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK

    Nick Freemantle

  5. School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK

    Rob Horne

  6. The McPin Foundation, London, SE1 4YR, UK

    Vanessa Pinfold

  7. Independent consultant, London, UK

    Lyn Kent, Ruth Smith & Katherine Darton

  8. University of Greenwich, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, London, SE10 9LS, UK

    Ruth E. Cooper

  9. East London NHS Foundation Trust, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK

    Ruth E. Cooper

  10. Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK

    Jemima Thompson

  11. Barnet Enfield Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK

    Robert Freudenthal

Authors
  1. Nadia E. Crellin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Priebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicola Morant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Glyn Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nick Freemantle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sonia Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rob Horne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vanessa Pinfold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lyn Kent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ruth Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Katherine Darton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ruth E. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Maria Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jemima Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Lisa Gruenwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Robert Freudenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jacki L. Stansfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Joanna Moncrieff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JM and SP developed the original concept for this study and drafted the protocol. All authors contributed to the design and methodology. NC provided study oversight. RC and ML collected the study data. NC, JT, JM, RC, ML, LG, JS and RF were involved with the analysis. NF provided oversight and guidance on the statistical analyses. NC and JM drafted the manuscript, and edited subsequent drafts. All authors reviewed and commented on drafts of the paper and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia E. Crellin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical approval was provided by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (Research Ethics Committee reference: 15/ES/0163).

Consent for publication

Not relevant as no details, images, or videos relating to an individual person were published in this paper.

Competing interests

GL has received funds in the course of acting as an expert witness in a case involving antidepressant withdrawal symptoms. No other authors have anything to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Questionnaire contents.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crellin, N.E., Priebe, S., Morant, N. et al. An analysis of views about supported reduction or discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment among people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. BMC Psychiatry 22, 185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03822-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03822-5

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us