Skip to main content
Download PDF

A clinical trial of cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life with Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy (CPdC)

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 222 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cancer is a common worldwide illness; it evokes psychological distress at different stages, during chemotherapy patient perceives a variety of psychiatric symptoms due to various medication side-effects and psychological distress. Studies have shown a significant impact of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in the management of psychiatric symptoms during chemotherapy. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of CBT for depression, anxiety, stress, death anxiety, satisfaction with life, and self-esteem among cancer patients during chemotherapy (CPdC).

Methods

Place and duration of the study: Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad in collaboration with Department of Oncology, Allied Hospital Faisalabad from November 20, 2020 and July 31, 2021. A total of 90 cancer patients were enrolled. 70 out of 90 met the eligibility criteria and 60 participants fulfilled all requirements. Participants were randomly allocated to four different groups. The pre-assessment screening was started along with the first trial of chemotherapy. The CBT-based treatment plan was formulated and one session per week was given to each patient for 3 to 4 months. Participants’ age range was 18–65 years (M ± SD = 47.51 ± 12.36. Demographic form, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), Death Anxiety Scale (DAS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) were administered. Descriptive, t-test, and repeated measure ANOVA statistics were used to investigate the findings.

Results

Results indicated significant mean difference on the variable of depression, anxiety and stress across four conditions (i.e. F(2, 56) = 39.55, p < .000, η2 = .679; F(2,56) = 73.32, p < .000, η2 = .797; F(2,56) = 119.77, p < .000, η2 = .865 respectively). On death anxiety significant difference across four conditions was found (F(2,56) = 22.71, p < .000, η2 = .549) with large effect size. Furthermore, findings indicated significant mean difference on the variable of satisfaction with life and self-esteem across four conditions was found (F(2,56) = 22.05, p < .000, η2 = .542; F(2,56) = 36.19, p < .000, η2 = .660) with large effect size.

Conclusion

It is concluded that CBT played a very effective role to reduce depression, anxiety, and stress-related psychiatric symptoms. CBT reduces the level of death anxiety and improving the quality of life and level of self-esteem among CPdC.

Trial Registration

The study trial was registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry-TCTR (TCTR20201113002).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cancer is a life-threatening disease and a major leading cause of death globally. The Cancer mortality rate is increasing, approximately7.6 million deaths happened in 2008, and this mortality rate reached 19.3 million in 2020 [1]. In Africa, Asia, Central, and South America, more than 60% of cases and 70% of deaths are reported because of cancer (WHO, 2012). In 2020, a recent estimate said 0.18 million new cases were reported in Pakistan, and approximately 0.12 million deaths happened out of 220 million population (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020). In Pakistan, the breast cancer rate is estimated at 31.5%, comparatively 2.5% higher than in Iran and India [2]. In Pakistan, women are at high risk of breast cancer and men with prostate cancer [3]. Around 50% of women ignore their physical health status, do not get proper health examinations timely, and die due to increased severity (Public Health, 2014).

Cancer comorbidity is common [4] with depressive disorder [5], sleep disorders [6], anxiety-related disorder [7], and other psychiatric disorders [8]. Psychiatric symptoms (i.e., anxiety, fear, worries, restlessness, fatigue, low mood, sleep, and appetite problems) are reported higher in CPdC [9]. Studies have proven that psychological treatment effectively treats emotional and psychiatric problems among CPdC [10]. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is a more promising approach to treat psychiatric problems and emotional vulnerabilities of CPdC [11]. CBT interventions address enormously depressive symptoms in cancer patients during chemotherapy [12]. CBT work starts from psychoeducation and continues until recovery [13]. Further, CBT creates an insight, addresses cognitive and behavioral problems, and provides skills training to CPdC [14].

Studies on the cancer patients related to their psychiatric problems are already rare. No one study is conducted in Pakistan on cancer patients to treat their psychiatric problems, particularly during chemotherapy. The general aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CBT on treating mental health problems, to improve patients’ quality of life and adherence to treatment.

Methodology

Research design

This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IBR), Government College University Faisalabad (Ref.No.GCUF/ERC/1996). Later on, the study protocol was approved by the Thai Clinical Trial Registry-TCTR on November 13, 2020 (TCTR20201113002). After approval from the registry, participants’ enrollment period was from November 20, 2020, to July 31, 2021. In this study, all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. All patients read the consent form and signed it before enrolling in the study.

This experimental study was done using between group research design. After completing all the codal formalities, the, patients were allocated to each group i.e. experimental =35 (stage-I = 17 & stage-II = 18) and waitlist control =35 (Stage-I = 17 & Stage-II = 18) at baselines assessment and at follow up phase, after further attrition, the number of participants in experimental group was 30 (i.e. stage-I = 15 & stage-II = 15) and in waitlist control was also 30 (i.e. stage-I = 15 & stage-II = 15).

The study recruited 90 cancer patients from the Department of Clinical Oncology, Allied Hospital Faisalabad, between November 2020 and July 2021. 70 out of 90 participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants’ attrition rate was 67.78%, and the rest of the 32.23% was excluded. For example, patients who refused to participate in the study were 11.12%, excluded due to comorbidity problems were 6.67%, patients moved to other hospitals were 2.23%, shifted to different cities were 2.23%, missed various follow-up sessions were 5.56%, and not participated in post-assessment were 4.45% (see Fig. 1). Participants’ age range was 25–65 years (M = 47.51, SD ± 12.36). However, as the study progressed and the originally small differences present in terms of gender-ratio, and marital status grew large when many participants left the study (more than 30). Albeit, this attrition of participants that resulted in seemingly disproportionate experimental and control groups was not a threat to internal validity as all other relevant measured variables of concern were balanced in both groups beforehand. Our study has achieved variance minimization in the desired measured variables as opposed to pure randomization across all measured variables which is in line with the recommendations of Sella et al. [15].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy (CPdC)

Full size image

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All the patients were screened and diagnosed by the consultant oncologist. Only cancer patients of stages I and II were included in this study. Participants with other medical comorbidities were excluded from the study. Participants with any apparaently severe physicalinjury, amputation, and/or loss of autonomous mobilitywere not listed in the study. Furthermore, participants with a history of psychotic illness, or other psychiatric disorders were excluded. Additionally, people who had difficulty understanding and reciprocating verbal communication (due to any reason) were also excluded from the study. Those patients who initially met the inclusion criteria but later faced significant health decline were also excluded.

Instruments

Demographic form and history-taking form were used for personal information and history of the problem. Then Urdu version Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), a 42 item self-report measure was used [16, 17]. The DASS is a 4-point Likert scale with a response category ranging from “did not apply to me all=0” to “applies to me most of the time=3”. Further, DASS provides ranges of severity from normal to extremely severe. The internal consistency of depression is 0.91, anxiety is 0.84, and stress is 0.90. Urdu version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) was used [18, 19]. SWLS is a 7 point Likert scale. Each item is scored from “strongly agree =7” to “strongly disagree = 1”. SWLS describes ranges from extremely satisfied to highly dissatisfied. SWLS has a sound internal consistency of 0.74 (Cronbach’s alpha). The Death Anxiety Scale (DAS) developed by Templer [20] and adapted by Saleem et al. [21]. The DAS investigates the level of death anxiety among cancer patients. Each statement is scored with a “yes” or “no” response. A score range of 9–5 indicates-high a level of death anxiety, and a range of 4–8 indicates a medium level. Scale test-retest reliability coefficient is 0.83, with an internal consistency coefficient of 0.76. In addition, an Urdu version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) was used [22, 23]. RSES consists of 10 items which are 4 points Likert scale from “strongly agree = 3” to “strongly disagree = 0”. High scores indicate a high level of self-esteem. The scale has a good reliability estimation of 0.87.

Intervention

CBT is an evidence-based approach to treat psychological problems of cancer patients [24, 25]. Structured treatment plan was formulated with set agendas, and all goals were achieved in therapeutic sessions. The 1st agenda was to “psycho-educate” the patients about the nature of their problem. Through 2nd agenda cognitive restructuring, they were educated on how they can address their cognitive errors and negative beliefs (which are causing an emotional disturbance). The 3rd agenda was to teach the patient about “identification of thoughts and core beliefs” and how patients can identify, evaluate, and respond to automatic thoughts and core beliefs. The 4th agenda was “stress and cancer crisis management”. The therapist trained the patients using various techniques to address stressors and crisis interventions [26]. The 5th agenda based on “motivation/boosters” to sustain during and after treatment to earn positive outcomes and hopes. The 6th agenda is based on “problem-solving skills”, cancer patients usually find themselves unable to manage stress, so it is important to strengthen their positive ways of managing stress [27]. The 7th agenda was to engage the patients in “leisure activities” to maintain a pleasant environment, pleasure activities, family gathering, and frequent social involvement [28]. The 8th agenda of the therapy was to boost up patients’ “coping strategies” to overcome the psychological vulnerabilities. The 9th agenda involved the patients in therapy on regular bases performing various regular “exercises and homework assignments” to process therapy outcomes faster. The 10th agenda of the therapy was “lapse-relapse prevention”.

Statistical analysis

Data was scrutinized and prepared for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation & frequency) were calculated to distribute and make the group comparable at the time of baseline assessment. Furthermore, Chi-square test for categorical variables and independent samples t-test, were used to compare the means between experimental and waitlist control on assessment variables. The P > .05 was used to test the variables that they are comparable and have no differences. To check the normality of the distribution (experimental and control group combined), skewness and kurtosis were used to check the sample normal distribution and S-K values were between +1.96 to – 1.96 which indicates that the sample was normally distributed. Furthermore, repeated measure ANOVA test was used to find out the differences between experimental and control group. An alpha of .05 was used to perform all analyses with p-value <.05 using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 24).

Results

There were no significant differences in pre-trearment measures (baseline assessment) in demographics characteristics and psychological measures between experimental and control groups (age 44.85 ± 10.87 vs. 45.60 ± 13.55 years, total age 47.73 ± 12.53 years, p = . > .05; age at diagnosis 43.99 ± 10.68 vs. 44.73 ± 12.9, total 46.86 ± 12.10 years p = . > .05; years of schooling 10.80 ± 2.29 vs. 10.29 ± 2.38, total 10.54 ± 2.33 years p = . > .05; depression 20.12 ± 5.0 vs. 18.34 ± 5.24, p = . > .05; anxiety 19.94 ± 6.38 vs. 16.14 ± 5.42, p = . > .05; stress 24.97 ± 6.17 vs. 21.94 ± 6.51, p = . > .05; death anxiety 11.20 ± 3.22 vs. 10.40 ± 3.19, p = . > .05; satisfaction with life 13.37 ± 13.52 vs. 13.52 ± 2.97, p = . > .05; self-esteem 14.52 ± 3.49 vs. 16.94 ± 5.32, p = . > .05) respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of participants’ demographic characteristics groups wise and overall
Full size table

Results (Table 2) indicated significant mean difference on the variable of depression, anxiety and stress across four conditions (i.e. F (2, 56) = 39.55, p < .000, η2 = .679; F (2,56) = 73.32, p < .000, η2 = .797; F(2,56) = 119.77, p < .000, η2 = .865 respectively) with large effect size. Results reveal that depression, anxiety, and stress-related symptoms significantly reduced after CBT treatment in stage-I (M ± SD = 5.0 ± 2.91; 5.07 ± 2.97; 6.86 ± 2.18) and stage-II (M ± SD = 6.25 ± 2.29; 4.93 ± 2.91; 8.50 ± 2.25) as compared to the control group in stage-I (M ± SD = 18.40 ± 6.95; 16.67 ± 6.0; 22.20 ± 6.76) and stage-II (M ± SD = 17.74 ± 7.23; 15.34 ± 6.16; 22.47 ± 6.17). The paired wise comparisons indicated significant means differences between experimental and control groups on depression, anxiety, and stress-related symptoms. On death anxiety significant difference across four conditions was found (F (2,56) = 22.71, p < .000, η2 = .549) with large effect size. Result reveals that death anxiety significantly reduced after CBT treatment in stage-I (M ± SD = 3.14 ± 0.87) and stage-II (M ± SD = 4.38 ± 1.93) as compared to the control group in stage-I (M ± SD = 11.00 ± 2.83) and stage-II (M ± SD = 9.34 ± 2.56). The paired wise comparisons indicated significant means differences between experimental and control group on death anxiety. Furthermore, findings indicated significant mean difference on the variable of satisfaction with life and self-esteem across four conditions was found (F(2,56) = 22.05, p < .000, η2 = .542; F(2,56) = 36.19, p < .000, η2 = .660) with large effect size. Results reveal that satisfaction with life and self-esteem significantly improved after CBT treatment in stage-I (M ± SD = 22.15 ± 3.66; 20.0 ± 2.26) and stage-II (M ± SD = 24.06 ± 5.63; 22.31 ± 1.86) as compared to the control group in stage-I (M ± SD = 13.93 ± 2.66; 15.07 ± 2.80) and stage-II (M ± SD = 14.20 ± 3.43; 17.27 ± 4.84). The paired wise comparisons indicated significant means differences between experimental and control groups on the variable of satisfaction with life and self-esteem. Overall, results explain that experimental group was found significant different from control group.

Table 2 Mean (standard deviation) and repeated measure ANOVA was used to investigate the difference between pre- and post-assessment results
Full size table

Graphical presentation of the results reveals that CBT produced substantial improvement on post-testing scores in the experimental group of stage-I and II. Similarly, participants with stage-I and II significantly reduced the level of depression, anxiety, stress, and death anxiety, and significantly improved the level of satisfaction with life and self-esteem scale as compared to the control group of stage-I and II among CPdC (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pre- and post-assessment analysis on the clinical variables between experimental and control groups

Full size image

Discussion

Overall findings appear to be in the same direction as those found in the literature regarding the high efficacy of CBT in treating cancer patients during chemotherapy to manage psychological symptoms [28]. CPdC experienced illness stress which leads to anxiety and depressive symptoms. It was appraised that CBT positively addresses depressive symptoms of low mood, lack of interest, sleeping, and appetite problems in cancer patients. Similarly, patients with cancer stage I and II from the experimental group were found not significantly different, but they were found significantly different from patients with cancer stage I and II of a control group. Furthermore, overall it was found that there were no significant differences across the stages of cancer within both experimental and control groups on all the measured variables; this indicates that the stage of cancer has did not make any significant difference for cancer patients. Herein, CBT interventions reduced the severity of overall clinical symptoms and increased patients’ willpower and confidence to face the illness’ adverse effects and restructure thoughts regardless of the stage of the cancer [29].

In therapy, our emphasis was to train the patients in terms of “psychoeducation, identification of thoughts and core beliefs, cognitive restructuring, inoculation of motivational thoughts/beliefs, and development of new skills; stress and cancer crisis management, problem-solving, coping strategies, leisure activities” [30]. Studies have shown a positive impact of CBT on addressing daily life stressors, identifying cognitive errors and thought restructuring, coping skills, and leisure activities [31]. When a therapist provided psychoeducation and awareness to patients about the nature of the illness, patients started to overcome the emotional problems through coping mechanisms [32]. The outcomes were evidence of a decrease in the level of psychological distress and increased willpower with high motivations, mood stability, and the ability to cope with stress throughout treatment [33].

The cognitive intervention proved beneficial to minimize anxiety symptoms. The CPdC patients, who received CBT interventions, exhibited an ability to manage death-related anxiety [34]. The therapist properly educated the patients using different techniques and skill training; they reduced fear of death anxiety, and psychological distress. It was observed CBT interventions reduced the intensity of anxiety disorders at the early stage of diagnosis as well as the early detection of anxiety-related symptoms, while the undetected symptoms will lead to severe anxiety disorders in later life [24].

CBT treatment significantly improved the level of life satisfaction and self-esteem among CPdC. During chemotherapy, patients usually experience somatic complaints and adverse side effects, which elevate patients’ mood swings cause dissatisfaction with life [13] and other associated extraneous factors increase more negative outcomes [35]. Further, individuals with low self-esteem perceived high scores on depression and low scores on life satisfaction during cancer treatment because of less responsible, lower need for achievement, and poor motivation, while patients with high scores on self-esteem perceived a low degree of depression and anxiety because theyare more stronger to control emotions and encourgment to bear the pain during treatment [12]. Thus, CBT focuses on developing illness acceptance and self-management to improve treatment efficacy and lower psychological disturbance [36]. CBT played a supporting role along with the chemotherapy trial to manage and overcome psychiatric symptoms; psychological distress was reduced, and there were improvements in the patient’s quality of life [37]. To our knowledge, it was the first CBT trial in Pakistan that was applied to cancer patients during chemotherapy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found CBT an evidence-based intervention with statistically significant efficacy and feasibility to treat psychiatric symptoms, reduce fears/apprehensions, improve mood stability, self-image, and satisfaction with life. CBT efficiently addresses maladaptive schemas and beliefs they trigger due to emotional disturbance and affects physical and mental health during chemotherapy.

Limitations and recommendations

This study was the first initiative in Pakistan to develop an evidence-based treatment model of CBT with cancer patients during chemotherapy. This is recommended along with chemotherapy as an additional and supportive treatment to produce better outcomes. Further study should find its efficacy with cancer patients at all stages, focusing on other psychological problems except depression and anxiety. Patients were not familiar with psychological interventions; therefore, the termination rate was high, and some patients did not practice these interventions properly due to a lack of awareness about their efficacy.

Clinical implications

This study provides a rationale background to practitioners that they can apply psychological interventions as supportive treatment modalities along with chemotherapy, increasing treatment adherence of the cancer patients. Psychoeducation, awareness, and psychological interventions are the most relevant treatment strategies that significantly address psychological problems and improve patients’ willpower and support of chemotherapy to produce better outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the present study are not publically available because no permission was taken from the participants and the hospital administration where the study was conducted. The datasets are available from the corresponding authors on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CBT:

Cognitive behavior therapy

CPdC:

Cancer patients during chemotherapy

DASS:

Depression anxiety stress scale

DAS:

Death anxiety scale

SwLS:

Satisfaction with life scale

RSES:

Rosenberg self-esteem scale

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

TCTR:

Thai clinical trial registration

WHO:

World health organization

IBR:

Institutional review board

M/F:

Male/female

M:

Mean

SD:

Standard deviation

DEPS:

Depression scale

ANXS:

Anxiety scale

STSS:

Stress scale

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asif HM, Sultana S, Akhtar N, Rehman JUr, Rehman RUr. Prevalence, risk factors and disease knowledge of breast cancer in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4411–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badar F, Mahmood S. Epidemiology of cancers in Lahore, Pakistan, among children, adolescents and adults, 2010–2012: a cross-sectional study part 2. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e016559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishra A, Meherotra R. Head and Neck Cancer: Global Burden and Regional Trends in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(2):537–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henderson FM, Cross AJ, Baraniak AR. ‘A new normal with chemobrain’: Experiences of the impact of chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits in long-term breast cancer survivors. Health Psychol Open. 2019;6(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang L, Fritzsche K, Leonhart R, Pang Y, Li J, Song L, et al. Emotional distress and dysfunctional illness perception are associated with low mental and physical quality of life in Chinese breast cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallagher J, Parle M, Cairns D. Appraisal and psychological distress six months after diagnosis of breast cancer. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7(3):365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Galiano-Castillo N, Ariza-García A, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Arroyo-Morales M. Depressed mood in breast cancer survivors: Associations with physical activity, cancer-related fatigue, quality of life, and fitness level. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(2):206–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan RJ, McCarthy AL, Devenish J, Sullivan KA, Chan A. Systematic review of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions to manage cognitive alterations after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(4):437–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobeanu O, David D. Alleviation of side effects and distress in breast cancer patients by cognitive-behavioral interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018;25(4):335–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duijts SFA, Faber MM, Oldenburg HSA, M van B, Aaronson NK. Effectiveness of behavioral techniques and physical exercise on psychosocial functioning and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients and survivors—a meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2011;20(2):115–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karyotaki E, Riper H, Twisk J, Hoogendoorn A, Kleiboer A, Mira A, et al. Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bieyabanie MH, Charandabi SMA, Mirghafourvand M. A randomized controlled trial regarding the effectiveness of group counseling on self-efficacy in mastectomized women. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2019;6(1):78–84.

  14. Greer S. CBT for emotional distress of people with cancer: some personal observations. Psychooncology. 2008;17(2):170–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sella F, Raz G, Cohen KR. When randomisation is not good enough: Matching groups in intervention studies. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021;28(6):2085–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aslam N, Tariq N. Psychological disorder and resilience among earthquake affected individuals. [Unpublished Dissertation]. Islamabad: Quaid-i-Azam University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5.

  19. Barki N, Choudhry FR, Munawar K. The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometric properties in Pakistani population. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:159–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Templer DI. The Construction and Validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. J Gen Psychol. 1970;82(2):165–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saleem T, Gul S, Saleem S. Death anxiety scale: translation & validation in patients with cardiovascular disease. Prof Med J. 2015;22:723–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Rizwan M, Malik S, Malik NJ, Siddiqui RS. Urdu Rosenberg self-esteem scale: an analysis of reliability and validity in Pakistan. Sociol Int J. 2017;1(2):56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raj S, Sachdeva SA, Jha R, Sharad S, Singh T, Arya YK, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness based cognitive behavior therapy on life satisfaction, and life orientation of adolescents with depression and suicidal ideation. Asian J Psychiatry. 2019;39:58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sherwood P, Given BA, Given CW, Champion VL, Doorenbos AZ, Azzouz F, et al. A cognitive behavioral intervention for symptom management in patients with advanced cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(6):1190–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shams N, Al-Azri M. The effect of cognitive behavior stress management program on the distress, coping skills, and the social support of omani women with breast cancer: a pilot study. Am Acad Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci. 2019;55(1):170–87.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Şahin S, Uyanık M. The impact of occupation-based problem-solving strategies training in women with breast cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):104–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richard A, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R, Wilhelm FH. Recover your smile: Effects of a beauty care intervention on depressive symptoms, quality of life, and self-esteem in patients with early breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2019;28(2):401–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pranjic N, Bajraktarevic A, Ramic E. Distress and PTSD in Patients with Cancer: Cohort Study Case. Mater Socio-Medica. 2016;28(1):12–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kyota A, Kanda K. How to come to terms with facing death: a qualitative study examining the experiences of patients with terminal Cancer. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18(1):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarenmalm EK, Mårtensson LB, Andersson BA, Karlsson P, Bergh I. Mindfulness and its efficacy for psychological and biological responses in women with breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2017;6(5):1108–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong X, Sun G, Zhan J, Liu F, Ma S, Li P, et al. Telephone-based reminiscence therapy for colorectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy complicated with depression: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(8):2761–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meghani S, Peterson C, Kaiser D, Rhodes J, Rao H, Chittams J, et al. A Pilot Study of a Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy Intervention in Outpatients With Cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2018;35(9):1195–200.

  34. Petricone-Westwood D, Jones G, Mutsaers B, Leclair CS, Tomei C, Trudel G, et al. A Systematic Review of Interventions for Health Anxiety Presentations Across Diverse Chronic Illnesses. Int J Behav Med. 2019;26(1):3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Systematic review of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions to manage cognitive alterations after chemotherapy for breast cancer - ScienceDirect [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804915000064

  36. Mami S, Tahmasebian H, Jahangiri MM. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on Reducing the Severity of Perceived Pain in Women with Breast Cancer. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2019;8(1) [cited 2021 Aug 31]. Available from: https://sites.kowsarpub.com/jcrps/articles/85003.html#abstract.

  37. Bronner MB, Nguyen MH, Smets EMA, van de Ven AWH, van Weert JCM. Anxiety during cancer diagnosis: Examining the influence of monitoring coping style and treatment plan. Psychooncology. 2018;27(2):661–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants who spent some precious time on the study, and they cooperated throughout the study. We also thank the medical and non-medical staff who facilitated the study.

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad, Zakid Block 1st floor, Main Campus, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan

    Qasir Abbas, Nimra Arooj, Muhammad Umar Khan & Mafia Shahzadi

  2. Department of Professional Psychology, Bahria University Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan

    Khawer Bilal Baig

  3. Department of Clinical Oncology, Medical University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan

    Muhammad Khalid

Authors
  1. Qasir Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nimra Arooj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khawer Bilal Baig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Umar Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Khalid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mafia Shahzadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.A. conceptualized the study, designing and applied for ethical approval, assisted in data collection, conducted therapeutic sessions, and drafted the manuscript for publication. N.A. prepared study protocol, collected data, scrutinized the data, and conducted therapeutic sessions. K.B. helped in trial registration, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and did treatment planning. M.U.K. helped in data arrangements, manuscript write-up, and edited the manuscript. M.K. helped in patients’ scrutiny, allocation, care, and supervision of medical treatment. M.S. helped in data collection, data preparation, and therapeutic sessions. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Q.A- Assistant Professor-Clinical Psychology, Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. N.A- Final year MS Clinical Psychology student, Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. K.B- Department of Professional Psychology, Bahria University, Lahore Campus, Punjab, Pakistan. M.U.K- Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. M.K-Department of Clinical Oncology, Medical University Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. M.S- PhD Scholar at Department of Applied Psychology, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qasir Abbas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Government College University Faisalabad, and Allied Hospital Faisalabad (Ref.No.GCUF/ERC/1996). Then study protocol was approved by the Thai Clinical Trial Registry-TCTR (TCTR20201113002). Participants gave written informed consent before the process of enrollment and screening. All procedures including participant enrollment, screening, data collection, data scrutiny and analysis were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, Q., Arooj, N., Baig, K.B. et al. A clinical trial of cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life with Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy (CPdC). BMC Psychiatry 22, 222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03863-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03863-w

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us