Skip to main content
Download PDF

Internalizing symptoms in adolescence are modestly affected by symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 233 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Internalizing disorders, such as anxiety and depressive disorders, are common mental disorders in young people, but a detailed understanding of the symptom continuity from childhood to adolescence that additionally includes a variety of neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) symptoms is lacking. We therefore aimed to assess the extent to which parent-reported anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms in childhood predict parent-reported internalizing symptoms in adolescence.

Methods

We used the nation-wide population-based Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden, comprising 4492 twins born in Sweden between 1998 and 2003 that were assessed at age 9, and then again at age 15. Linear regression in a structural equation modelling framework was used to analyze the data.

Results

Overall, our results indicate that 15.9% of the variance in internalizing symptoms at age 15 can be predicted by anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms at age 9. Anxiety and NDD symptoms in childhood predicted the largest amount of internalizing symptoms in adolescence.

Conclusions

Adolescent internalizing symptoms are modestly affected by childhood symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs, suggesting that they may represent different constructs across age. Future studies should further empirically investigate differences in etiology and trajectories of childhood versus adolescent internalizing symptoms.

Peer Review reports

Background

Internalizing disorders, such as anxiety and depressive disorders, are common mental disorders in children and adolescents and constitute an increasing burden by means of impairment in daily life [1,2,3]. Anxiety disorders affect between 9 and 32% of children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years, while the rate of youth depressive disorders is estimated between 3 and 14% [4, 5].

While internalizing disorders and symptoms have been reported to increase in frequency from childhood to adolescence [6, 7], studies have identified different trajectories over time. For example, trajectories from childhood to adolescent anxiety and depression have been reported to be of homotypic [8, 9] and heterotypic nature [9]. Homotypic continuity refers to the continuity of the same construct over time (e.g., childhood anxiety predicts adolescent anxiety). Heterotypic continuity refers to a construct developing into another construct over time (e.g., childhood anxiety predicts adolescent depression). Considering that anxiety and depression symptoms have both distinct features (e.g., physiological hyperarousal in anxiety, low positive affect in depression) and common features such as negative affect [10], both homotypic and heterotypic trajectories are likely to occur. In an effort to examine the clustering of anxiety and depression symptoms in a community sample of children and adolescents, Cannon and Weems [11] reported a group with high levels of anxiety symptoms in 6 to 11-year-old children but with low levels of depression symptoms. However, the opposite was the case in 12 to 17-year-old adolescents, suggesting that internalizing symptoms may present themselves differently across age. In support of this notion, twin studies describe an increase of anxiety and depression symptoms during adolescence as well as high symptomatic stability in this age period, opposed to only moderate symptomatic stability in childhood. This change is also mirrored by differences in etiology: the heritability of anxiety and depression symptoms was found to be highest in childhood and then declined from adolescence and onwards [12].

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs, e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), developmental coordination disorder, tic disorder, and learning disorder) have their onset in the developmental period [13]. This group of disorders is believed to be present from birth, or at least at a very young age (with the exception of tic disorder), typically precedes the onset of internalizing disorders [14, 15], have been found to share etiology with internalizing disorders [16], and can be partly expressed through symptoms shared with anxiety and depressive disorders in children (e.g. [17,18,19,20]). For example, ADHD may be expressed through excessive crying, experiencing strong distress when separated from a caregiver, or disturbance of sleep [17, 18]. Children with ASD exhibit impairments in socio-communication manifested by avoidance or reluctance to social situations as well as restricted speech [17, 19, 20]. Taken together, it is possible that internalizing symptoms in childhood may be a partly distinct phenotype from internalizing symptoms in adolescence, with childhood internalizing symptoms potentially being more closely related to NDDs than adolescent internalizing symptoms. Today, there is a paucity of studies that have examined underlying differences in childhood and adolescent internalizing symptoms while simultaneously including a variety of NDDs.

The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the relationship between childhood and adolescent internalizing symptoms by analyzing data from 4,492 Swedish twins aged 9 and 15 years. Specifically, the aim was to assess the extent to which parent-reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs in childhood predict parent-reported internalizing symptoms in adolescence.

Methods

Participants

The study is based on data from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS). CATSS is an ongoing, longitudinal, population-based study on somatic and mental health problems in children and adolescents (for details, see Anckarsäter et al. [21]). In short, since 2004, parents of all Swedish twins born from July 1992 and onwards are contacted in connection with the twins’ 9th or 12th birthday (CATSS-9/12, note that the first three years of the study also included 12-year-olds, however, these are not included in the present study) and asked to participate in a telephone interview, which includes measures of NDDs and mood disorder symptoms. The relevant measures for anxiety and depression at age 9 were included in CATSS from the 1998 cohort and onwards. When the twins reach the age of 15, families are contacted again and asked to fill out a web-based questionnaire, targeting various mental health problems (CATSS-15). CATSS-15 includes twins born from the 1st of January 1994 and onwards. The overall response rate in CATSS-9/12 is approximately 70%. The overall response in CATSS-15 is 50% (parent report). In the present study, we included 12,644 individuals born between 1998 and 2003, out of which 11,437 had complete data on the NDD symptoms measure, 10,429 had complete data on the depression measure, and 9,016 individuals had complete data on the anxiety measure. A total of 8,949 individuals had complete data on all three measures at age 9 (i.e., no missing values on any of the three measures). Out of these 8,949 individuals, 4,492 individuals had complete data on all measures at both age 9 and age 15, which was the final number of individuals in the study sample. All measures (i.e., at age 9 and 15) were parent-reported.

Measures at age 9

Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)

The Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ [22]) is a 13-item subscale from the longer 33-item Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, measuring core depressive symptoms in children and adolescents aged 6 – 17 years old. We used the parent report version. Parents are asked about their child’s feelings and actions over the timeframe of the previous two weeks. Items are scored as 0 (no), 1 (yes, to a certain degree) and 2 (yes). Total SMFQ scores range between 0 and 26. A total score of 12 or higher may indicate depression [23]. The SMFQ has been found to distinguish well between individuals with clinical depression and non-depressed individuals in a community sample [24] and has shown to correctly identify episodes of depression in youth [25]. In our sample, the scale has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.83).

Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)

The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED [26]) is a 41-item inventory designed to measure five child and adolescent anxiety symptom dimensions (i.e., panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, and school anxiety/refusal). Items are scored as 0 (no), 1 (yes, to a certain degree) or 2 (yes), yielding a total score between 0 and 82. A total score greater than, or equal to, 25 may indicate an anxiety disorder [27]. The parent-reported version was used in this study. The SCARED was found reliable in terms of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, shows significant correlations with other measures for childhood anxiety disorders, and has been found to have good discriminant validity between anxiety and other mental disorders, as well as within anxiety disorders [26,27,28,29]. In our sample, the scale has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.88).

The Autism-Tics, ADHD and other Comorbidities inventory (A-TAC)

The Autism-Tics, ADHD and other Comorbidities inventory (A-TAC [30, 31]) is a fully structured 96-item parent-report telephone interview designed for large-scale epidemiological purposes. The A-TAC is based on symptom criteria and common clinical features of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders, including NDDs, as well as common other problem areas in child and adolescent psychiatry. Items are scored as 0 (no), 0.5 (yes, to some extent), and 1 (yes), and are divided into modules corresponding to diagnostic domains (e.g., Concentration & attention, Impulsiveness & activity, Social interaction, Language). Distributions, Cronbach’s α and heritability estimates are reported elsewhere [21]. Cross-sectional and longitudinal validation studies show good to excellent cross-sectional and predictive validity for, amongst others, ADHD, ASD, developmental motor coordination disorder, tic disorder, and learning disorder [31, 32]. A study by Pettersson et al. [33] described a broad general NDD factor accounting for a large proportion of the covariation among neurodevelopmental problems. To cover NDD symptoms, including their extensive phenotypic overlap both above and below diagnostic thresholds, a factor analysis of the 53 items on the A-TAC targeting ADHD, ASD, developmental coordination disorder, tic disorder and learning disorder was performed to examine their latent structure. Next, we fitted a one-factor model and created a single factor score for all individuals. To increase power, the NDD factor was created on all individuals (i.e., birth years 1992 and onwards), whereas statistical analyses are based on birth years 1998 and onwards (for descriptive statistics, see Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for sample variables and scales
Full size table

Measures at age 15

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

CATSS-15 contains the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ [34]). The SDQ is a brief, 25-item behavioral screening questionnaire for children and adolescents between 3 and 16 years and was developed to assess externalizing and internalizing symptoms. It consists of five subscales (i.e., conduct problems, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, peer problems, and prosocial behavior) with five items in each subscale. In the present study, the emotional problems scale (parent report) was used as an indicator of internalizing symptoms in adolescence. The scale has 5 items with 3 response options: 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), and 2 (certainly true), yielding a total score between 0 and 10. The SDQ is widely used to screen for internalizing symptoms both in community and clinical settings [35, 36]. Studies of the Swedish version of the SDQ symptom scales have confirmed the factor structure of the original English SDQ [37]. Results from a validation study of the Swedish SDQ revealed that the parent version discriminates well between psychiatric and non-psychiatric individuals [38]. In our sample, the SDQ emotional symptoms scale has shown acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.71).

Statistical analyses

To examine the relationship between anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms in childhood (i.e., at age 9), and internalizing symptoms in adolescence (i.e., at age 15), Cholesky decomposition models were employed. The model is comparable to a linear regression model within a structural equation modelling framework with regards to explained variance and covariance between the predictors and outcomes, but with the additional benefit that explained variance in the outcome can be partitioned into unique and shared contributions from the predictors. Thus, we aimed to estimate unique and shared explained variance of the three predictors (anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms in childhood) on a fourth outcome variable (internalizing symptoms in adolescence). Next, we portioned the explained variance in the outcome into a part that was uniquely explained by each included predictor, and a part that was explained by the predictors but cannot be uniquely attributed to any one of the predictors – we refer to this part as ‘shared’. Each model has a focus on how much variance in the outcome (i.e., adolescent internalizing symptoms) is explained by the various predictors (i.e., anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms in childhood). In total, we fitted four models to examine unique associations, including different combinations of childhood predictors: (1) anxiety symptoms, (2) anxiety and NDD symptoms, (3) anxiety and depression symptoms, and (4) all predictors. Since dependencies between twins can affect the precision of estimates (i.e., small standard errors and tight confidence intervals), we furthermore included an unstructured covariance matrix between twins in pairs for all variables (different covariance matrices for monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs). All analyses were controlled for sex and birth year and were conducted in R 4.0.2 [39] using the R package ‘OpenMx’ [40].

Results

Table 1 shows descriptive statistics for the anxiety, depression, and NDD symptom measures in childhood, and the adolescent internalizing symptoms measure. Overall, adolescent internalizing symptoms were neither explained by anxiety, depression, nor NDD symptoms to a substantial degree (Table 2). Childhood anxiety symptoms, and childhood anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively, explained approximately 12% of the variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms, with childhood depression symptoms having little unique effect. Childhood anxiety and NDD symptoms, and all childhood symptoms, respectively explained approximately 16% of the variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms. In the latter model, childhood anxiety symptoms explained 5.4% (95% CI 4.1% – 6.6%), and NDD symptoms explained 1.9% (95% CI 1.3% – 2.5%) of the variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms, while childhood depression symptoms did not uniquely explain any variance. Eight-point-six percent (95% CI 7.4% – 9.8%) of the explained variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms was shared between the childhood predictors.

Table 2 Unique and shared explained variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms by childhood anxiety, depression, and NDD symptoms
Full size table

Discussion

The present study examined the relationship between symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs in childhood and internalizing symptoms in adolescence in a longitudinal, population-based study of 4,492 Swedish twins. Overall, our results indicate that only a small amount of internalizing symptoms at age 15 can be explained by symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs at age 9.

In line with previously reported patterns of continuity [8, 9] and findings from twin studies [12], we found that internalizing symptoms in adolescence can be partially demarcated from symptoms of anxiety and depression in childhood. In our sample, anxiety symptoms at age 9 predicted most of the variance while depression symptoms at age 9 predicted virtually none of the variance in internalizing symptoms at age 15, further supporting the idea that the expression of internalizing symptoms may be age-dependent [11]. That is, anxiety may be more dominantly expressed in childhood internalizing symptoms, while depression may be more characteristic of adolescent internalizing symptoms. It has been suggested that childhood depression is often overlooked, as its clinical presentation in children differs from that of adults [41]. Symptoms are expressed with less verbality and may resemble those of anxiety and several NDDs (e.g., crying, irritability, somatic complaints, behavioral problems). Studies have indicated that the trajectories of depression are dependent on whether symptoms first manifest in childhood or adolescence. For example, Rice et al. [42] compared one group whose depression symptoms emerged in early adolescence with a group whose symptoms emerged later in adolescence. The early-onset group was associated with an elevated genetic risk for childhood ADHD and other neurodevelopmental symptoms. Similarly, externalizing symptoms in childhood, but not in early adolescence, were found to be predictive of depression symptoms in adolescence [43], suggesting that childhood/early-onset forms of depression may be more closely associated with neurodevelopmental symptomatology. In the present study, childhood NDD symptoms explained negligible variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms, and although NDDs are common in both children and adolescents with anxiety disorders [44,45,46,47], it has been suggested that they may be more common in childhood anxiety disorders than in adolescent anxiety disorders [48]. Future studies have yet to investigate if different constellations of NDDs can be discerned in individuals with anxiety and depression in childhood vis-à-vis adolescence.

From an intervention or prediction perspective, our findings highlight the need to take age into account. It is possible that anxiety and depression in childhood require different intervention approaches than adolescent anxiety and depression. For example, Creswell et al. [49] note in a recent review on the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents that there is surprisingly little known about age-specific interventions of anxiety disorders, even though clinical characteristics for children and adolescents vary. The authors point out, however, that a major difference in the treatment of child versus adolescent anxiety lies in a greater focus on parental involvement in children. For depression, research generally shows that serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to be less effective in young people than in adults when treating depressive disorders [50], while for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders, these medications generally work well in reducing the severity of anxiety [51], even more so in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy [52]. Although treating NDDs and childhood anxiety/depression indeed have positive effects on the child’s functioning, our results suggest that at least a large share of adolescent internalizing symptoms may be explained by factors unrelated to NDDs, anxiety and/or depression in childhood; likely due to an influx of genetic innovation in these age groups [12]. Nonetheless, childhood anxiety symptoms and NDD symptoms together explained roughly 16% of the variance in adolescent internalizing symptoms. Interventions towards childhood NDD symptoms and/or anxiety symptoms probably act in an interactive – rather than additive – fashion, which is why treatment of NDDs and/or anxiety symptoms may affect the development of adolescent internalizing symptoms.

The present study has several strengths, including the usage of a large sample size, the use of validated assessment instruments, and finally, utilization of a longitudinal population-based sample.

The findings also have to be interpreted in the light of some limitations. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs in childhood, and internalizing symptoms in adolescence were assessed via parent report, which may have caused differences in response rates regarding parents who responded at age 9 and 15, and who did not. That is, a parent may not have answered because their child has a more profound NDD and/or anxiety/depression symptomatology. Alternatively, parents may have been more inclined to participate in the study and exaggerate on the questionnaires because they wanted their child to get help. Thus, results should be interpreted with caution regarding generalizability. Related to this, it was not examined which children in CATSS were treated for their childhood NDD and/or anxiety/depression symptoms, which may have theoretically masked an association in the present study. Roughly half of the parents who responded in CATSS-9/12 answered in CATSS-15, and, as reflected in the attrition analyses (see Additional file 1, Supplementary Table S1) those who responded in both waves had a significantly lower NDD score, but a much less pronounced difference was found in SCARED and SMFQ. This is in line with other studies that have reported that non-responders have a higher degree of psychopathology [53, 54]. With parent reports in general, parents may not be fully aware of their child’s anxiety/depression symptomatology, as they are often internalized [55] and displayed symptoms may occur outside of the parents’ visibility (e.g., in school or during interaction with peers). The use of self-reports may have therefore delivered different results. It has been suggested that self-reports tend to become a more reliable source of information the older the child becomes [56]. With internalizing disorders specifically, adolescent self-reports were found to predict internalizing disorders beyond information offered by parent reports [57]. Although the use of parent reports at age 15 can thus be viewed as a limitation in our study, it has been suggested that the SDQ is able to accurately capture internalizing symptoms in both self- and parent reports [58, 59]. We used different measures to capture symptoms of anxiety, depression, and NDDs in childhood, and internalizing symptoms in adolescence, which has likely influenced the ability of these measures to capture the “same” underlying construct of internalizing symptoms at the two time points. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether using the same scale and source of report across age will deliver perfect construct validity, as the meaning of any reported measure will likely change over time. For example, depression at age 9 and 15 may be conceptualized differently – certainly on a phenotypical level – and is thus unlikely captured by the same items across age. Finally, given that our outcome was internalizing symptoms in adolescence measured on a continuous scale, we very well may have picked up ‘common’ teenage anxiety, as this is a time coupled with identity shaping and worrying [60]. Hence, stricter definitions and/or categorical diagnostic criteria defined as such in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 may have yielded different results with regards to shared explained variance.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that adolescent internalizing symptoms are modestly affected by symptoms of childhood anxiety, depression, and NDDs, indicating that they may represent different constructs across age. Future studies should further empirically investigate differences in etiology and trajectories of childhood versus adolescent internalizing symptoms.

Abbreviations

ADHD:

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

ASD:

Autism spectrum disorder

A-TAC:

Autism-Tics, ADHD, and other Comorbidities inventory

CATSS:

Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden

NDD:

Neurodevelopmental disorder

SCARED:

Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders

SDQ:

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

SMFQ:

Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire

References

  1. Essau CA, Conradt J, Petermann F. Frequency, comorbidity, and psychosocial impairment of anxiety disorders in German adolescents. J Anxiety Disord. 2000;14(3):263–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(99)00039-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezpeleta L, Keeler G, Erkanli A, Costello EJ, Angold A. Epidemiology of psychiatric disability in childhood and adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42(7):901–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strauss CC, Frame CL, Forehand R. Psychosocial Impairment Associated with Anxiety in Children. J Clin Child Psychol. 1987;16(3):235–9. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1603_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghandour RM, Sherman LJ, Vladutiu CJ, Ali MM, Lynch SE, Bitsko RH, Blumberg SJ. Prevalence and Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in US Children. J Pediatr. 2019;206:256–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, Benjet C, Georgiades K, Swendsen J. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(10):980–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Perou R, Bitsko RH, Blumberg SJ, et al. Mental Health Surveillance Among Children – United States, 2005–2011. Mmwr-Morbid Mortal W. 2013;62(2):1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costello EJ, Copeland W, Angold A. Trends in psychopathology across the adolescent years: what changes when children become adolescents, and when adolescents become adults? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(10):1015–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02446.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bittner A, Egger HL, Erkanli A, Costello EJ, Foley DL, Angold A. What do childhood anxiety disorders predict? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(12):1174–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01812.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen JR, Andrews AR, Davis MM, Rudolph KD. Anxiety and Depression During Childhood and Adolescence: Testing Theoretical Models of Continuity and Discontinuity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018;46(6):1295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0370-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991;100:316–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannon MF, Weems CF. Do anxiety and depression cluster into distinct groups? A test of tripartite model predictions in a community sample of youth. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23:453–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nivard MG, Dolan CV, Kendler KS, Kan KJ, Willemsen G, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Lindauer RJ, van Beek JH, Geels LM, Bartels M, Middeldorp CM, Boomsma DI. Stability in symptoms of anxiety and depression as a function of genotype and environment: a longitudinal twin study from ages 3 to 63 years. Psychol Med. 2015;45(5):1039–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171400213x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

  14. Beesdo K, Knappe S, Pine DS. Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: Developmental Issues and Implications for DSM-V. Psychiat Clin N Am. 2009;32(3):483–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2009.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luby JL. Preschool Depression: The Importance of Identification of Depression Early in Development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19(2):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410364493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Doering S, Lichtenstein P, Gillberg C, Kuja-Halkola R, Lundström S. Internalizing and neurodevelopmental problems in young people: Educational outcomes in a large population-based cohort of twins. Psychiatry Res. 2021;298: 113794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartley SL, Sikora DM. Which DSM-IV-TR criteria best differentiate high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from ADHD and anxiety disorders in older children? Autism. 2009;13(5):485–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309335717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Luteijn EF, Serra M, Jackson S, Steenbuis MP, Althaus M, Volkmar R, Minderaa R. How Unspecified Are Disorders of Children with a Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified? A Study of Social Problems in Children with PDD-NOS and ADHD. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;9:168–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007870070040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart ME, Barnard L, Pearson J, Hasan R, O’Brien G. Presentation of depression in autism and Asperger syndrome: A review. Autism. 2006;10(1):103–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361306062013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood JJ, Gadow KD. Exploring the Nature and Function of Anxiety in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2010;17(4):281–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anckarsäter H, Lundström S, Kollberg L, Kerekes N, Palm C, Carlström E, et al. The Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS). Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14(6):495–508. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.14.6.495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Angold A, Costello EJ, Messer SC, Pickles A, Winder F, Silver D. Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1995;5(4):237–49.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wood A, Kroll L, Moore A, Harrington R. Properties of the Mood & Feelings Questionnaire in adolescent psychiatric outpatients: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995;36(2):327–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thapar A, McGuffin P. Validity of the shortened mood and feelings questionnaire in a community sample of children and adolescents: a preliminary research note. Psychiatry Res. 1998;81(2):259–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(98)00073-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Daviss WB, Birmaher B, Melhem NA, Axelson DA, Michaels SM, Brent DA. Criterion validity of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire for depressive episodes in clinic and non-clinic subjects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(9):927–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01646.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, Neer SM. The screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(4):545–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38(10):1230–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hale WW, Raaijmakers Q, Muris P, Meeus W. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in the general adolescent population. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(3):283–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200503000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muris P, Merckelbach H, Mayer B, van Brakel A, Thissen S, Moulaert V, Gadet B. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) and traditional childhood anxiety measures. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1998;29(4):327–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(98)00023-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hansson SL, SvanstromRojvall A, Rastam M, Gillberg C, Gillberg C, Anckarsater H. Psychiatric telephone interview with parents for screening of childhood autism - tics, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and other comorbidities (A-TAC): preliminary reliability and validity. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:262–7. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.3.262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larson T, Anckarsäter H, Gillberg C, Ståhlberg O, Carlström E, Kadesjö B, Råstam M, Lichtenstein P, Gillberg C. The Autism-Tics, AD/HD and other Comorbidities inventory (A-TAC) further validation of a telephone interview for epidemiological research. Bmc Psychiatry. 2010;10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-10-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mårland C, Lichtenstein P, Degl’Innocenti A, Larson T, Råstam M, Anckarsäter H, Gillberg C, Nilsson T, Lundström S. The Autism-Tics, ADHD and other Comorbidities inventory (A-TAC) previous and predictive validity. Bmc Psychiatry. 2017;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1563-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pettersson E, Anckarsäter H, Gillberg C, Lichtenstein P. Different neurodevelopmental symptoms have a common genetic etiology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(12):1356–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gustafsson BM, Proczkowska-Bjorklund M, Gustafsson PA. Emotional and behavioural problems in Swedish preschool children rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0864-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;12(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smedje H, Broman JE, Hetta J, von Knorring AL. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.” Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;8(2):63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Malmberg M, Rydell AM, Smedje H. Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(5):357–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480310002697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.

  40. Neale MC, Hunter MD, Pritikin JN, Zahery M, Brick TR, Kirkpatrick RM, Estabrook R, Bates TC, Maes HH, Boker SM. OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling. Psychometrika. 2016;81(2):535–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mullen S. Major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. Ment Health Clin. 2018;8(6):275–83. https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2018.11.275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rice F, Riglin L, Thapar AK, Heron J, Anney R, O’Donovan MC, Thapar A. Characterizing developmental trajectories and the role of neuropsychiatric genetic risk variants in early-onset depression. JAMA Psychiat. 2019;76:306–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nilsen W, Gustavson K, Røysamb E, Kjeldsen A, Karevold E. Pathways from maternal distress and child problem behavior to adolescent depressive symptoms: a prospective examination from early childhood to adolescence. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(5):303–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e318293ab05 (PMID: 23751885).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bowen R, Chavira DA, Bailey K, Stein MT, Stein MB. Nature of anxiety comorbid with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children from a pediatric primary care setting. Psychiatry Res. 2008;157(1–3):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.12.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pine DS, Guyer AE, Goldwin M, Towbin KA, Leibenluft E. Autism spectrum disorder scale scores in pediatric mood and anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(6):652–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816bffa5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Towbin KE, Pradella A, Gorrindo T, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Autism spectrum traits in children with mood and anxiety disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005;15(3):452–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2005.15.452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van Steensel FJ, Bogels SM, Wood JJ. Autism spectrum traits in children with anxiety disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(2):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1575-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Masi G, Millepiedi S, Mucci M, Poli P, Bertini N, Milantoni L. Generalized anxiety disorder in referred children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43(6):752–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000121065.29744.d3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Creswell C, Waite P, Hudson J. Practitioner Review: Anxiety disorders in children and young people – assessment and treatment. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2020;61:628–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression in children and young people: identification and management. NICE guideline [NG134]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2019.

  51. Creswell C, Waite P, Cooper PJ. Assessment and management of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(7):674–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, Ginsburg GS, Rynn MA, McCracken J, Waslick B, Iyengar S, March JS, Kendall PC. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sertraline, or a Combination in Childhood Anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheung KL, Ten Klooster PM, Smit C, de Vries H, Pieterse ME. The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Kessler RC, Little RJ, Groves RM. Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):192–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Comer JS, Kendall PC. A symptom-level examination of parent-child agreement in the diagnosis of anxious youths. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43(7):878–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000125092.35109.c5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Edelbrock C, Costello AJ, Dulcan MK, Kalas R, Conover NC. Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child. Child Dev. 1985;56(1):265–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Contributions Toward Diagnosis of Adolescent Psychopathology. Hope TL, Adams C, Reynolds L, et al. Parent vs. Self-Report. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 1999;21:349–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022124900328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Brit J Psychiat. 2000;177(6):534–9. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.6.534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Laugesen N, Dugas MJ, Bukowski WM. Understanding adolescent worry: the application of a cognitive model. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003;31(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021721332181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg. This work has been supported by the CAPICE project, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 721567. The Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden is supported by Swedish Research Council (Medicine, Humanities and Social Science, and SIMSAM) Grant number: 2017–02552, Funds under the ALF agreement, grant number ALFGBG-776031 and Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE), grant number 2015‐00075.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health (CELAM), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Sabrina Doering & Sebastian Lundström

  2. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Henrik Larsson, Linda Halldner & Ralf Kuja-Halkola

  3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Linda Halldner

  4. Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Christopher Gillberg & Sebastian Lundström

Authors
  1. Sabrina Doering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henrik Larsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Halldner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher Gillberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ralf Kuja-Halkola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sebastian Lundström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RKH, SL and SD designed the study. SD performed all statistical analyses. SD and SL wrote the manuscript. RKH, HL, LH, and CG critically read and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Doering.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The parents were informed about the study in connection with their twins’ 9th and 15th birthday. Participating in interviews, after being informed about the study, is regarded as verbal informed consent (age 9) and, at age 15 the parents agreed to participate via a web-questionnaire and digitally consented after being informed about the study. Both the CATSS-9 and 15 have ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (DNR: 2010/597–31/1; 2016/2135–31;2009/739–31-5) in which the procedures above were described and approved. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doering, S., Larsson, H., Halldner, L. et al. Internalizing symptoms in adolescence are modestly affected by symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. BMC Psychiatry 22, 233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03875-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03875-6

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us