Skip to main content

Participants’ experiences of AVATAR therapy for distressing voices: a thematic qualitative evaluation



AVATAR therapy is an innovative therapy designed to support people with distressing voices. Voice hearers co-create a digital representation of their voice and engage in dialogue with it. Although it has been successfully tested in a powered randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN65314790), the participants’ experience of this therapy has not been yet evaluated. We aimed to explore enablers and barriers to engagement with the therapy and potential for real-world impact on distressing voices.


Thirty per cent of those who completed AVATAR therapy (15 people in total) and 5 who dropped out from therapy within the main AVATAR RCT were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview, which was audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed.


Fourteen therapy completers (28% of the full sample) and one person who dropped out of therapy after 1 active session, were interviewed. Thematic analysis was used to explore the interviews. A total of 1276 references were coded, and five overarching themes identified: AVATAR therapy set-up; voice embodiment and associated emotions; working in a safe space (supported by the therapist); learning new ways of relating to the voices; impact of therapy on everyday life. Overall, the therapy set-up, with its digital components and its distinctive features as compared with common face-to-face talking therapies, was satisfactory. The inclusion of technology was well accepted as both a means to deliver the therapy and a tool to create a digital representation of the person’s distressing voice. The co-creation of the avatar and the enactment of the relationship between the person and the voice were perceived as a very helpful process to promote the therapeutical dialogue. Participants reported engaging well with the therapist and feeling supported and identified specific learnt strategies to deal with the voices and how they have had an impact on everyday life.


AVATAR therapy is acceptable and provides benefit for participants with psychosis. Our results highlighted the enablers and challenges of working dialogically with distressing voices using a digital representation and dealing with highly demanding emotional, cognitive, and relational processes linked to the experience. Our analysis also identified the core strategies learnt by participants and how these were generalised to their daily life resulting into a positive change in different domains, and in particular broader social relationships.

Peer Review reports


Emerging psychological therapies for distressing voices in psychosis target the relationship between the person and their voice in order to reduce the impact and distress that negative voices can have on people [1,2,3]. AVATAR therapy is an innovative therapy approach designed to support voices hearers to develop an increased sense of power and control over their voices by promoting a dialogue between the person and a digital representation of the voice (or avatar) [4]. Two therapy phases are involved: Phase 1 (sessions 1 to 3) focuses on exposure and assertive responding; Phase 2 (sessions 4 to last) focuses on relational, emotional, and developmental processes [4, 5]. Preliminary encouraging evidence for the efficacy of the therapy has been reported in two independent pilot studies [6, 7] and further supported by the findings of a large fully-powered randomised controlled trial comparing AVATAR therapy and Supportive Counselling [8], which showed a post-therapy effect size of d = 0.8 on the primary outcome (total score on the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales, auditory hallucinations subscale (PSYRATS–AH, [9]). AVATAR therapy is now being further examined for optimal delivery, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in a new multi-centre randomised controlled trial ISRCTN55682735 [10].

While AVATAR therapy shares a common theoretical rationale with other cognitive and relational therapies for voices it also involves a number of distinctive elements. Firstly, it requires the person to create a digital visual representation of their voice, matching physical and voice characteristics, using bespoke computer software. This unique process of virtual voice embodiment and real-time communication involves direct exposure to the anxiety-provoking fear stimuli and the experience of sense of voice presence (i.e., the degree to which the avatar dialogue matched the everyday voice experience [11]) during sessions. Secondly, the therapy set-up requires that the person and the therapist move to separate rooms during therapy dialogues (as the therapist is in control of voicing the avatar). Thirdly, all sessions are audio recorded and a copy of the avatar dialogue is provided on an MP3 player to the participant with instructions to listen to the recording at home, especially when they hear the voice(s).

These distinctive aspects are linked to the blending of digital technology within this face-to-face relational therapy. Some studies on digital interventions have highlighted the importance of exploring the effects of digital technology on therapeutic alliance [12]. One of the key aspects is the role of the human professional support when delivering digital interventions [13]. In AVATAR therapy, two essential delivery processes are directly linked to the role of the therapist: 1) voicing the avatar (which includes use of derogatory verbatim content in early sessions) and 2) providing continuous support and encouragement to the voice hearer to stand up and talk back to the avatar using assertive responding [5].

Different aspects of AVATAR therapy have been examined, including its efficacy [8], key therapy targets [5], reduction of subjective in-session anxiety levels and role of sense of voice presence [11],and changes in dialogue dynamics and content [14]. However, a qualitative exploration of the person’s experience of AVATAR therapy is crucial to better understand the intervention’s perceived helpfulness and impact, and to optimise its delivery. The present study is the first to explore the personal experience of taking part in AVATAR therapy within a full powered randomised trial, to further understand the impact and experience of this therapy directly from people having this therapy.


The present study was part of the AVATAR trial (ISRCTN65314790), a randomised clinical trial based in London (UK) which commenced in November 2013 and was reported in Craig et al., 2018, and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki. The additional research ethics approval for the study reported here was granted in February 2015 (London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee, reference 13/Lo/0482).


Stratified sampling: thirty per cent of those who completed AVATAR therapy (15 people in total) within the AVATAR RCT [8] were invited to take part in the study. To achieve full representativeness of sample characteristics and therapy delivery, the following purposive sampling variables were applied when identifying participants: gender, ethnicity, number of voices and therapists delivering AVATAR therapy (six in total). Additionally, 5 participants who dropped out from therapy were also invited to complete the qualitative interview to explore reasons for dropping out and potential negative aspects of the therapy. All participants met inclusion and exclusion criteria for the AVATAR RCT The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) aged over 18 years; 2) have experienced troubling auditory hallucinations for at least 12 months, and 3) primary diagnosis of non-organic psychosis (including ICD-10 categories F20-29 and F30-39, subcategories with psychotic symptoms). Criteria for exclusion were as follows: 1) CBT for psychosis or attending a group specific to hearing voices; 3) unable to identify a single dominant voice to work on; 4) refusing all medication; 5) a diagnosis of organic brain disease; 6) a primary substance dependency; 7) auditory hallucinations not in English; 8) not having sufficient English language abilities to engage in therapy and assessments, and 9) inability to tolerate the assessment process.


Interview guide

The semi-structured topic guide interview was developed in collaboration with the trial’s patient and public involvement (PPI) representative, who was also involved in the first pilot study of AVATAR therapy [6], and an independent lived experience mental health researcher. Consensus meetings with the research and therapy team facilitated the development of the interview guide.

The final interview consisted of 10 subsections including 48 questions. The subsections were as follows: reason to participate in the study (introductory question), experience of creating the “avatar”, the experience of dialoguing with the avatar, reflections on therapy sessions, use of the MP3 player, impact of the therapy on voices and everyday life, the therapist, post therapy experiences, overall experience, and software improvement.

Interview process

Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted by a clinical psychologist and the lived experience mental health researcher. The interviewers were not involved in therapy delivery to the present study participants. The interviews were open-ended with duration ranging from 29.11 to 58.07 min. Participants were informed that anything disclosed during the interview would not be shared with the trial therapists, and only information about significant risk would be shared with their routine care teams. Participants were paid £20 for their participation in this study. All interviews were transcribed, anonymised, and checked for accuracy.

Analysis methods

Thematic analysis [15] was used to explore the interviews: themes and subthemes emerged after coding, categorisation and analytic reflection, in which relationships between these themes were also identified [16]. NVivo v.12 was used to support the coding, structuring, organisation, and analysis of the data. IBM SPSS 27.0 package was used to calculate the frequencies, mean and standard deviations of the demographic and clinical variables.

All transcribed data were read twice and re-read to ensure familiarity with it. Two randomly selected transcripts were preliminarily coded by two members of the research team (MRC and NE, one of whom was also involved in conducting the interviews) who independently recorded initial codes before discussing. Suggested codes were further discussed with a third team member (TW), who also reviewed the two selected interviews. As a result, a preliminary coding frame incorporating multiple perspectives on the collected data was agreed. This preliminary framework incorporated main overarching topics, mainly corresponding to the interview guide, but evolved with subsequent analysis of further interviews. When half of the interviews were coded, a reliability check was performed by an additional member of the research team (CE), which resulted in no additional codes to the previous coding frame. The resulting iteration of the coding frame was reviewed by the rest of the research team. All the research team members who contributed to the final iteration of the coding frame have a clinical psychology or psychiatry background and, with the exception of NE, they all have been trained and have delivered AVATAR therapy and have participated in data analyses of various studies of trial data (MRC, TW, CE, PAG and TC). Two independent completers of AVATAR therapy (current members of the PPI group for the new multi-centre randomised controlled trial of AVATAR therapy ISRCTN55682735, [10]) reviewed and contributed to the refinement of wording of themes and subthemes separately.



From the fifteen completers invited to the interview, 14 consented to participate and completed the interview (n = 14, 28% of completers). One person declined to take part. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are depicted in Table 1. One person who dropped out from therapy (after session 1) consented and completed the interview for the present study; the other four declined because of not being interested (3) or feeling unwell (1). Voice characteristics and reasons to take part in the AVATAR RCT are summarised in Table 2.

Table 1 Demographics and clinical descriptives of completers (N = 14)
Table 2 Reasons for taking part in the AVATAR RCT and information about the voice selected for therapy purposes

Thematic analysis

A total of 1276 references were coded. The thematic analysis identified five overarching themes: 1) AVATAR therapy set-up; 2) voice embodiment and associated emotions; 3) working in a safe space (supported by the therapist); 4) learning new ways of relating to the voices; and 5) impact of therapy on everyday life. Within these 5 themes, several sub-themes were identified by the thematic analysis (please see Fig. 1). Quotes which represent examples of each subtheme are given in Table 3.

  • 1. AVATAR therapy set up

    This theme involved digital aspects of AVATAR therapy linked to engagement. Satisfaction with the software was identified as a subtheme: of those who talked about it (79%), all expressed satisfaction with the result of creating and interacting with the avatar. Concerns about technology was identified as another subtheme, with one of seven participants expressing some worries about data security or the possibility of his avatar being something found on the internet by others. The rest expressed not having concerns about using technology during sessions. Finally, all the participants shared their experience of using the MP3 with the avatar’s dialogue recordings: about half (n = 6) of them reported having used the MP3 1 to 4 times while being in therapy but having stopped using it at the end of it, five people reported having used it during the therapy and still “using it when necessary”, “when I feel down”, “before going to bed”, “any time that I feel like it” or “to top up” after they finished. Two people reported not having used it between sessions (only when they were with their therapist in session) but having used it after the therapy had ended. One person did not listen to the recordings at all because he was “troubled enough with his voices and did not like the sound of his own voice". Main reasons for not using it after therapy (when shared with the interviewer) were: being busy looking for a job, voice in the recording not sounding like their own voice, carrying the mp3 with them in case they need it but not having done it since end of therapy, and not needing it because “my voices hardly bother me”. All those who reported having used it either during or during and after the therapy, considered the recordings a positive resource.

  • 2. Voice embodiment and associated emotions

    This theme reflects the participants views related to the process of voice embodiment and potential reactions and emotions trigged by this process. Four main subthemes emerged. Strong, and often unexpected, emotional reactions to the experience of talking back to a visual and auditory representation of the voice were shared by the majority of the participants (64%). Participants talked about feeling anxious, frightened or embarrassed at times. Similarly, some participants (43%) described how at times past memories emerged while conversing with the avatar; in all of these cases the memories were related to traumatic experiences (including the experience of becoming unwell with psychosis). Subjective experiences of high realism, sense of voice presence, emotional and behavioural reactions to having the avatar in front of them and interacting with it also emerged within this theme (79%). Interestingly, one participant presenting a comorbid diagnosis of Autism, expressed that for him talking to the avatar was more like talking to a computer only: “I was satisfied, but it would have been nice if I was talking not to a computer, but to a person himself. Because I’m autistic, that’s what I was doing: talking to a computer”. Understanding of working “with only one voice” emerged as a subtheme, with participants (43%) agreeing that it is a good approach to work initially with only one.

  • 3. Safe space facilitated by therapist support

    The relationship with the therapist was highlighted by all the participants (100%), indicating that it is an essential component of AVATAR therapy. All reported feeling very supported and understood by their therapist along the sessions, and how that helped them to confront the avatar. The majority of the participants (93%) reported that talking to the avatar was challenging particularly during the first sessions: they felt anxious or uncomfortable when talking to the avatar, and even “not capable of talking back” or “forgetting what I talked to the therapist about what I would say to the avatar”. When asked about therapy expectations, one person stated that they expected that the voices “would go away permanently”, another one expressed being “sceptical” and the rest reported no specific expectations.

  • 4. Learning new ways of relating to the voices

    Participants described how they acquired new strategies and confidence to talk back to their voices. Standing up to the voice, increased feelings of self-confidence when conversing with the avatar and greater sense of control over their own behaviour (i.e., choosing to engage or disengage from the voice) were three of the identified strategies. The theme also captured how participants (around 50%) explained the reduction of their distress during the course of the therapy: from high levels of anxiety at the beginning of the therapy to significantly lower levels at the end. This theme also depicted how, with the help of the therapist, AVATAR therapy helped them to make sense of their voices and how their emotions and behaviours could influence them.

  • 5. Impact of therapy on everyday life

    Participants shared their experience of how their learning with AVATAR therapy affected their everyday life. Several participants (43%) highlighted how they could now engage in social situations and feel more confident around other people. The majority (80%) reported a clear reduction of the frequency of voices during their daily life and almost half of the participants talked about how the therapy impacted other voices (if multiple voices were present). All of them, except one person, reported that the other voices also became “quieter” or occurred with reduced frequency following AVATAR therapy. All completers agreed that they would recommend AVATAR therapy to other people experiencing negative distressing voice, with some of them (n = 3) highlighting the advantage of having a personalised image of their voice or “other” to talk to during therapy in order to gain control over the voices. Participants were also asked whether they had perceived or suffered harmful effects during or after AVATAR therapy (e.g., increase of frequency and distress of voices, agitation, low mood or hospitalisation). All those who spoke about it (86%), expressed no perception of any adverse effects or a worsening of their voices, or negative consequences in their everyday life during or after AVATAR therapy. Short term emotional reactions during therapy were captured when asked about in-session experiences (see theme voice embodiment and associated emotions above).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Thematic network illustrating intersection between themes

Table 3 Emerging themes and sub-themes of the thematic analysis

Drop-out interview

One interview was conducted with a participant who dropped out from therapy after session 1. Ray reported hearing three voices and was experiencing psychosis for more than 29 years at the time of the interview. He also reported having had psychological therapy several times (mainly CBT) and, from his point of view, all psychological therapies that he had “helped to reduce any symptoms associated with psychosis”. His main motivation for participating was helping others, especially researchers.

During the qualitative interview, he reported not liking “being analysed” and also not liking “being watched” in general. Consequently, during his therapy session, Ray “felt an increase in paranoia, suspiciousness and anxiety”. His main reason for dropping out was the travelling to the neighbourhood where the main clinic delivering AVATAR therapy was located, to attend sessions with his therapist. He explained to the interviewer that he had previously lived in that neighbourhood and it was associated “with negative experiences” for him. The travelling to and from therapy triggered high levels of anxiety and he could only think of going back home.

Ray reported that the avatar looked “very similar to my dominant voice” and “he was very anxious about talking to it”, which he did not like. He considered that the technology was “good enough” and that he barely had to make any changes to the avatar for it to look like his voice. However, he decided that the therapy would not be good for him especially because he did not want to be in the clinic and did not want to be “analysed by the therapist or the computer”. Ray suggested that AVATAR therapy would be a good option for young people starting to suffer from psychosis.


The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to report the impact and personal experiences of those who have experienced AVATAR therapy. The therapy set-up, with its digital components and distinctive features in comparison with common face-to-face talking therapies, was satisfactory. The inclusion of technology was well accepted as both a means to deliver the therapy and a tool to create a digital representation of the entity behind the person’s distressing voice. The creation of the avatar and the enactment of the relationship between the person and the voice were perceived as a very helpful process to promote an engaging therapeutical dialogue. In line with Rus-Calafell et al. (2020) [11], participants reported high levels of sense of voice presence and high perceived realism of the avatar, which are proposed to contribute to the implicit activation of structures related to fear and support in vivo cognitive and emotional work. This sense of voice presence and real-time dialogue raised certain challenges identified by participants, such as emergence of strong emotional reactions and, in some cases, re-activation of trauma-related memories. However, crucially none of the participants identified any long-term negative impact related to these in-session responses consistent with the finding of no therapy-related Serious Adverse Events during the large-scale clinical trial (Craig et al. 2018) [8] . These responses are also commonly observed in trauma-focused CBT approaches [17] and potentially reflect anticipated responses to the emotional processing and rescripting of meanings associated with developmental trauma, which are central to many AVATAR therapy dialogues [5]. This finding does however underscore the importance of establishing fully informed consent with sensitive pacing and regular therapist check-ins crucial during phase 1 dialogues. The only individual factor that appeared to hinder delivery of the therapy, in terms of the avatar’s realism and on-line dialogue, was the comorbidity of autism and psychosis. The person with this comorbidity expressed clear difficulties with engaging in the dialogue with the avatar and feeling more like “talking to a computer”. Although this result must be interpreted with caution, it remains unclear whether this difficulty is best explained by the difficulties in representational and abstract thinking associated with autism, or by the inclusion of computerised social characters (the avatar) or a combination of both. Despite the fact that some studies show promising results of digital interventions for autism spectrum disorders [18], understanding the rationale of creating and dialoguing with the avatar as a representation of a social entity (‘as if’ the voice), is likely to be crucial in order for AVATAR therapy to have beneficial effects.

Participants’ views on acquisition of new strategies to deal with their distressing voices were also in line with previously identified therapeutic targets [5] and changes in relational behaviours with the avatar [14]. Improving self-confidence, (re) building sense of power and control over the voices by standing up to them, and improving their understanding (e.g., voices part of oneself, internal thoughts, association with mood) were the strategies commonly endorsed by participants. Participants’ perceived impact of AVATAR therapy on everyday life was also consistent with the RCT results [8], with most participants reporting a significant decrease of frequency of their voices. Furthermore, half of participants reported a positive impact of the therapy on how they engage with other people, suggesting generalisation of new modes of relating into daily social relationships. This converges with other relational therapies for voices (see Relating Therapy for voices [19] and Talking with Voices [2], in which the principles of assertive responding are learnt through the experience of standing up to the voices. These principles can then be generalised to difficult relationships, with the goal of voice hearers experiencing more connection to others [20].

All participants reported engaging well with the therapist and feeling supported, which helped them to confront the avatar despite, at times, feeling anxious with the experience (especially during early sessions). This positive engagement goes some way to addressing concerns about the possible negative impact on alliance of the therapist voicing the avatar (through voice transformation software). Both the consistent dialogue support and personalised positive feedback cultivated the therapeutic alliance through encouraging the person to try “new things” within a safe space. In essence the AVATAR dialogue can be understood as behavioural experiment, supported by the therapist to deliver a powerful context for new learning. Importantly a good therapeutic alliance was maintained even though the active dialogue was delivered through a digital platform whereby the participant and therapist are situated in separate rooms. This finding becomes especially relevant during covid-impacted times, suggesting the potential for AVATAR therapy to be delivered online (i.e., remotely, using video call software). This possibility would reduce the costs and practicalities of the clinic delivery while it adapts to current policies and needs of telehealth due to COVID 19 [21]. In the future, the combination of improved IT literacy and the normalisation of interacting with a computer could support greater acceptance of digital interventions, such as AVATAR therapy, and facilitate their integration into users’ daily lives.

The inclusion of the MP3 player as part of the between session activities was accepted and considered a positive resource among participants. Only one person was not able to listen to it due to the interaction with their distressing voices. Ongoing use of the MP3 following therapy completion varied across participants, with half of participants continuing to listen to recordings. The requirement to use or carry an additional device was identified as a key barrier to ongoing use, which could be mitigated in the future by access to dialogues through personal smartphones (where available) [10]. Encryption and safety related issues should be considered carefully.

One interview with a person who dropped-out from therapy was conducted. The main finding deriving from this interview was that there might had been some implications of the confluence of other psychotic experiences when delivering AVATAR therapy (e.g., persecutory delusions or difficulties with getting out of the house). Ray’s experience of “being watched and analysed during therapy” by the therapist, along with a personal history of traumatic experiences in the same neighbourhood where the mental health service was located, triggered suspicious thoughts that did not allow him to continue with the therapy. He was satisfied with the technology and managed to create his avatar, although he was not willing to have a conversation with it. These challenges appeared to be idiosyncratic as clinical characteristics of those taking part in the AVATAR RCT showed that participants presented with complex affective and non-affective psychosis (i.e., multiple voices, presence of delusions, depression and anxiety symptoms), with an average length of the illness > 20 years and common presence of trauma (see Tables 1 and 2 in [8]), and yet the majority were able to complete AVATAR therapy (71%). Further qualitative research into the experience of receiving AVATAR therapy should aim to develop a better understanding of therapy-related processes that increase the risk of drop-out.

There are some limitations of our study. Firstly, the group of therapy non-completers is clearly underrepresented. A total of 22 people dropped out from AVATAR therapy (with only 8 giving a reason for withdrawing explicitly related to therapy [5]), therefore only 5% of those who dropped out are represented in the present study (vs. the 20% of completers represented). Future qualitative evaluations of AVATAR therapy should put in place more specific procedures to keep people who dropped out of therapy engaged with the research team in the hope of learning more about their reasons for abandoning the therapy. Secondly, despite having a PPI representation in the process of creating the interview, conducting interviews, reviewing, and commenting on the coding frame, this was not a consistent group that had input into all the research procedures linked to the RCT. This limitation is being addressed in the new AVATAR multi-centre randomised controlled trial by establishing local PPI groups which contribute in a more integrated manner to the delivery of the trial in a range of ways, including the planned qualitative interview study [10]. Lastly, although there was a balance between interviewers in relation to their role in the study (a member of the research team and an external researcher who joined only to conduct interviews), socially desirable responding may have occurred to an unknown extent.


This study provides important participant feedback that AVATAR therapy is acceptable and benefits participants with psychosis. All participants felt supported by their therapist, and all would recommend AVATAR therapy to others struggling with distressing voices. The thematic analysis highlighted the enablers and challenges of working dialogically with distressing voices using a digital representation, dealing with high demanding emotional, cognitive, and relational processes linked to the experience. Our analysis also identified the core strategies learnt by participants and how these were generalised to their daily life resulting into a positive change in different domains, and in particular broader social relationships.

The insights from this qualitative study together with analysis of the therapy process [5, 14] are informing the ongoing evolution of AVATAR therapy. Following the success of the first fully-powered randomised trial [8] a multi-site trial is currently underway focussing on optimisation and implementation of the approach, which includes training a cohort therapists to deliver therapy in frontline services. Future qualitative work should aim to understand factors relating to potential therapy drop-out including the opportunities and challenges of early direct work with verbatim voice content. With respect to implementation, it will also be important to explore the experiences of therapists who are being trained to deliver AVATAR therapy.

Availability of data and materials

Although anonymised, the qualitative datasets generated for the current study are potentially identifiable and therefore not suitable to be deposited in a public database. The data are however available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Auditory verbal hallucinations


Audio Visual Assisted Therapy Aid for Refractory auditory hallucinations


Cognitive Behavioural Therapy


Information technology


National Health Service


Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale Auditory Hallucinations


Patient and public involvement


Randomized controlled trial


  1. Hayward M, Berry K, McCarthy-Jones S, Strauss C, Thomas N. Beyond the omnipotence of voices: further developing a relational approach to auditory hallucinations. Psychosis. 2014;6(3):242–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corstens D, Longden E, May R. Talking with voices: exploring what is expressed by the voices people hear. Psychosis. 2012;4(2):95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steel C, Schnackenberg J, Perry H, Longden E, Greenfield E, Corstens D. Making Sense of Voices: a case series. Psychosis. 2019;11(1):3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Craig TK, Ward T, Rus-Calafell M. AVATAR therapy for refractory hallucinations. In: Pradhan B, Pinninti N, Rathod S, editors. Brief Interventions for Psychosis : A Clinical Compendium. London: Springer; 2016. p. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward T, Rus-Calafell M, Ramadhan Z, Soumelidou O, Fornells-Ambrojo M, Garety P, et al. AVATAR therapy for distressing voices: a comprehensive account of therapeutic targets. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46:1038–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leff J, Williams G, Huckvale MA, Arbuthnot M, Leff AP. Computer-assisted therapy for medication-resistant auditory hallucinations: proof-of-concept study. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. du Sert OP, Potvin S, Lipp O, Dellazizzo L, Laurelli M, Breton R, et al. Virtual reality therapy for refractory auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: a pilot clinical trial. Schizophr Res. 2018;197:176–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig TK, Rus-Calafell M, Ward T, Leff JP, Huckvale M, Howarth E, et al. AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haddock G, Tarrier N, Morrison AP, Hopkins R, Drake R, Lewis S. A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of individual inpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy in early psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34(5):254–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garety P, Edwards CJ, Ward T, Emsley R, Huckvale M, McCrone P, et al. Optimising AVATAR therapy for people who hear distressing voices: study protocol for the AVATAR2 multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rus-Calafell M, Ward T, Zhang XC, Edwards CJ, Garety P, Craig T. The role of sense of voice presence and anxiety reduction in AVATAR therapy. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Henson P, Wisniewski H, Hollis C, Keshavan M, Torous J. Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: initial review. BJPsych Open. 2019;5(1):e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tremain H, McEnery C, Fletcher K, Murray G. The therapeutic alliance in digital mental health interventions for serious mental illnesses: narrative review. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(8):e17204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien C, Rus-Calafell M, Craig TK, Garety P, Ward T, Lister R, et al. Relating behaviours and therapeutic actions during AVATAR therapy dialogue: an observational study. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021;60(4):443–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. London: Sage; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Feary N, Brand R, Williams A, Thomas N. “Like jumping off a ledge into the water”: a qualitative study of trauma-focussed imaginal exposure for hearing voices. Psychol Psychother. 2022;95:277–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandgreen H, Frederiksen LH, Bilenberg N. Digital interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;51(9):3138–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayward M, Jones AM, Bogen-Johnston L, Thomas N, Strauss C. Relating therapy for distressing auditory hallucinations: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2017;183:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayward M, Bogen-Johnston I, Deamer F. Relating therapy for distressing voices: who, or what is changing. Psychosis. 2018;10:132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haque SN. Telehealth beyond COVID-19. Psychiatr Serv. 2021;72(1):100–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the members of the Public and Patient Involvement group representatives for their support with this study. We would also like to thank research workers Lorraine Omari-Asor and Kathryn Hubbard for their help with the transcription of the interviews.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum. The present study was part of the AVATAR randomised controlled trial funded by the Wellcome Trust (FWBC-AVATAR 098272/z/12/z).

MRC acknowledges individual funding from the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award (Alexander von Humbold Foundation and Ministry of Education and Research, Germany). PG acknowledges financial support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MRC, TW, PG and TC designed the study. MRC and JW conducted interviews. MRC and NE created the initial coding frame. Identification and description of themes, subthemes and codes were discussed among NE, TW, CE, PG, TC and MRC. MRC wrote the draft of the manuscript. NE, TW, CE, MH, JW, PG and TC helped critically revise the article and approved the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mar Rus-Calafell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (reference 13/Lo/0482) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Consent for publication

Informed consent from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s) for publication of identifying information/images in an online open-access publication was obtained. All potentially identifiable information has been removed from published material included in the present study.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rus-Calafell, M., Ehrbar, N., Ward, T. et al. Participants’ experiences of AVATAR therapy for distressing voices: a thematic qualitative evaluation. BMC Psychiatry 22, 356 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: