Skip to main content

Development and validation of a maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice scale in China

Abstract

Background

Maternal anxiety induced by neonatal jaundice has adverse effects on maternal and infant health, but there was no specific tool to identify the anxiety level of mothers. This study aims to develop a Maternal Anxiety for Neonatal Jaundice Scale (MANJS) and to validate it in the target population.

Methods

An initial 11-items MANJS was developed through literature review, expert panel consultation, and a pilot-test. Subsequently, mothers of neonates with jaundice were recruited from the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province, China, from June to December 2018, for a formal questionnaire survey. Based on the data collected, the scale was validated for construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, content validity, and internal consistency reliability after the items screening.

Results

The reliability and validity of MANJS were validated in 1127 mothers of jaundiced neonates. After the item with cross-loadings was removed using exploratory factor analysis, MANJS consisted of two dimensions and 10 items, with a cumulative variance contribution of 74.36% and factor loadings above 0.6 for all items. The confirmatory factor analysis identified three items with cross-factor loading or error correlation and then they were removed orderly. The further confirmatory factor analysis showed a good construct validity for the 7-item MANJS, with standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.029, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.068, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.961, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.937, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.961, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.954, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.998, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.996, respectively. The average variance extracted values (AVE) of the two factors were 0.80 and 0.72, and the combined reliability (CR) were 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 for the MANJS, and split-half reliability was 0.72.

Conclusions

MANJS was demonstrated to have satisfactory reliability and validity in evaluating maternal anxiety caused by neonatal jaundice among Chinese postpartum women.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neonatal jaundice is a common and frequent neonatal disease, most of which appears in the first week after birth. It can be seen in about 60% of full-term infants and over 80% of premature infants in the world [1]. Most cases of neonatal jaundice are physiological and do not require special treatment commonly as it can subside on its own [2]. However, in some children, jaundice may develop into acute bilirubin encephalopathy or nuclear jaundice, which is the primary cause of newborn re-hospitalization [3]. Although this condition is rare, it still needs to be monitored. Otherwise, the life and health of infants will be seriously endangered, and the surviving infant may have long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae [1, 3].

Newborn jaundice can also adversely affect mothers, especially on psychological health. The mental problem in postpartum women has received international attention for a long time, but compared to postnatal depression, there is still a need for more comprehensive research on postnatal anxiety as a separate event. A Meta analysis conducted in 2016 estimated that about 8.5% postpartum women overall were affected by one or more anxiety disorders, with a maximum of 39% [4], and more women were in a subclinical state of anxiety [5]. Anxiety is a complex psychological state. In 1966, Spielberger proposed the division of anxiety into trait anxiety and state anxiety [6]. Trait anxiety is a relatively stable personality trait with individual differences. Individuals with high levels of trait anxiety are more likely to perceive the threat posed by situational stress and therefore more inclined to experience higher levels of state anxiety [6, 7]. State anxiety is a temporary psychological or physical symptom that occurs in the face of a specific situation or stressful event [7, 8]. The degree and duration of maternal state anxiety is not only related to personal trait anxiety, but also depends on the role of some stressful events to some extent [9]. Neonatal health is usually an important event that causes maternal postpartum state anxiety [10], such as preterm birth, the infant admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and the appearance of neonatal jaundice in this study. Phillips et al. also find that 65% content of maternal worry was related to infant health, safety and wellbeing [11]. Due to the short mean length of hospital stay after delivery in most countries [12], a large number of neonatal jaundice symptoms appear or aggravate after discharge from hospital. However, many postpartum women have insufficient cognition of jaundice [13] and lack confidence in the knowledge and ability of nursing care after discharge [14], so they may become more worried about the condition of infants and be prone to common anxiety on neonatal jaundice [5].

The negative emotions of mothers may prevent them from adopting a correct attitude towards the problem of neonatal jaundice. It will also hinder the establishment of the mother-infant relationship, which will have a long-term impact on infants’ cognition, emotion, and physical development [15, 16]. The huge psychological pressure and burden of mothers is not conducive to postpartum recovery, may increase the risk of postpartum depression, and is also related to family harmony [17]. Meanwhile, temporary state anxiety in the early postpartum period is a key predictor of higher levels of maternal anxiety in long term [18]. In view of the above, the emotional impact of neonatal jaundice, which is highly prevalent in the early postnatal period, on mothers deserves attention. The scientific measurement of anxiety is undoubtedly an essential prerequisite to timely screen for the associated maternal state anxiety associated with neonatal jaundice, so as to provide targeted psychological interventions accordingly. Previous studies mainly focused on the mental intervention measures for the mothers of jaundiced neonates, and the measurement tools were mostly general scales, such as State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HARS), and Baker Anxiety Scale (BAI), etc [19,20,21,22,23]. There was no specific scale to measure maternal anxiety associated with neonatal jaundice. Therefore, this study aims to develop a Maternal Anxiety for Neonatal Jaundice (MANJS) to realize the targeted evaluation of the psychological status of postpartum mothers, so as to improve the scientificalness and effectiveness of psychological interventions.

Methods

Scale development

The development of MANJS was divided into three steps. In step 1, forming an item pool. The keywords “neonate”, “neonatal”, “health”, “jaundice”, “mother”, “maternal”, “parents”, “worry”, “anxiety”, “psychology” were used to search for Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data. And we conducted comprehensive reviews of the literature about parent’s emotions and behaviors caused by neonatal health. The existing mature anxiety scales, such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [23,24,25], were also referred to. In step 2, we organized a six-member panel of experts with relevant professional backgrounds, including two chief physicians of maternal and child health departments and one chief pediatrician with more than 10 years of clinical experience, one professor of psychology with expertise in maternal mental health, one professor of epidemiology and one professor of social medicine with extensive academic experience in designing similar measurement instruments. The experts discussed the importance, comprehensiveness, feasibility of these items according to their professional knowledge and practical experience, and finally extracted two factors conceptually associated with maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice: (1) Physical and mental reaction; (2) Behavioral manifestation. Based on these two dimensions, 11 items were selected to form the preliminary MANJS. Third, the questionnaire was pilot-tested in 30 mothers of jaundiced neonates to ensure that the questions were clear and understandable to all participants, and the acceptability of the survey and the time required to complete it were also reviewed. These 30 mothers were recruited from the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province using the convenience sampling method.

Scale validation

The validation study for the 11-item MANJS was conducted from June to December 2018, in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province and the mothers of jaundiced neonates during postpartum hospitalization were recruited. The inclusion criteria of subjects were as follows: (1) the newborn was diagnosed by clinicians to have jaundice symptoms, (2) self-reported no history of psychiatric illness or substance use, (3) owned basic cognitive ability and understanding as judged by a trained nurse, (4) informed consent and willingly participated in this research. After the onset of neonatal jaundice, trained nurses explained the purpose and significance of this study to the mothers and obtained their cooperation. And questionnaires were filled in by the respondents themselves or explained to them by nurses and filled in on their behalf. The content of the questionnaire was divided into two parts: (1) basic demographic information, including the maternal age, educational level, residence, family economic status, parity, feeding pattern, and newborn gender, age, gestational age, type of delivery, etc. (2) the preliminary MANJS. Items of the MANJS were evaluated using the responses “never happened”, “occasionally”, “often” and “almost always” which were coded with values from 1 to 4. The total scale score was the sum of each item’s score. The higher the score, the more anxious the mother was about neonatal jaundice.

Screening of scale items

Correlation analysis

The Pearson correlation coefficients between each item score and total MANJS score was calculated. And the higher the correlation, the higher the homogeneity between the item and the scale. If no statistical correlation was found between item score and total scale score (P > 0.05), the item was considered for screening out.

Discrimination coefficient

The scores of all the respondents to the 11-item MANJS in this study were sorted in order of high and low, with the top 25% respondents representing the high group and the bottom 25% representing the low group. An item’s discrimination coefficient was determined by the difference between the average scores of the item in these two groups. The greater the difference, the higher the discrimination power of the item. The item whose discrimination coefficient < 0.5 was removed from the scale.

Exploratory factor analysis

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to investigate the factor structure of the scale. Prior to EFA, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) > 0.5 or Bartlett’s spherical test P < 0.05 were used to determine the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Factor extraction was performed by principal component analysis and Varimax factor rotation. According to Kaiser criterion and Catell’s Scree plot, factors with eigenvalue greater than 1 were retained. Item removal criteria were: (1) the factor loading was less than 0.4 on each of factors, (2) items with substantial cross-loadings on two or more factors.

Validity

Construct validity

Based on the factor structure extracted from the exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to explore the fitting between the factor structure of MANJS and actual data. The following assumptions were made about the CFA model: (1) no cross-factors loading, (2) errors were independent of each other. Due to the ordered categorical responses of the scale, weighted least square means and variance adjusted estimation (WLSMV) [26, 27] was chosen as the parameter estimation method to confirm the factor structure. We reported several goodness-of-fit indicators to assess overall model fit: χ2, df, χ2/df, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), incremental fit index (IFI), normed fit index (NFI), and comparative fit index (CFI). According to the recommended cut-off value [28,29,30,31], χ2/df < 3, SRMR < 0.05, RMSEA < 0.08, GFI, AGFI, TLI, IFI, NFI, CFI > 0.95, were considered good fit values. And χ2/df < 5, SRMR < 0.8, RMSEA < 0.10, GFI, AGFI, TLI, IFI, NFI, CFI > 0.90 were considered acceptable fit indices. In addition, we examined the modification index and factor loadings, on the basis of the assumptions of CFA model, items with large error correlations and cross-factor loadings were removed, and items with factor loadings < 0.7 were also deleted. Removed one item at a time and performed CFA again until the fit indices reached expected levels.

Convergent validity and discriminant validity

The average variance extracted values (AVE), combined reliability (CR), and correlation coefficients among factor scores were calculated to test the convergent validity and discriminant validity. AVE ≥ 0.5, CR > 0.7 and CR > AVE were demonstrative of an acceptable convergent validity [32, 33]. Discriminant validity was considered satisfactory if the correlation between factor scores was significant and the correlation coefficient was less than the square root of the corresponding AVE [33].

Content validity

It was assessed by Pearson correlation between the MANJS score and the sum scores for items within each factor.

Reliability

Cronbach’s Alpha

This statistic was calculated to measure the internal consistency of the MANJS. Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7 represented an acceptable reliability.

Split-half reliability

It was estimated by Pearson correlation between the scores of the odd and even items of the MANJS.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the package Lavaan, semTool in R system (version 4.0.3) and IBM SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). For the descriptive analysis of general data, the enumeration data were expressed as frequency and constituent ratio (%), while the quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (‾X ± S) or median and interquartile range. All the differences were tested using two-tailed tests and the significance level was set as 0.05.

Results

During the study, a total of 1406 questionnaires were distributed and 1161 mothers of jaundiced neonates participated in the survey, with a response rate of 82.57%. 34 questionnaires were deleted due to the lack of data. Finally, we analyzed 1127 qualified questionnaires.

Demographic characteristics

1127 mothers had an average age of 29.31 ± 4.64 years, and 45.52% of them were primiparous women, 74.53% were breastfed (Table 1). The proportion of male and female newborns was balanced, with an average age of 3.31 ± 2.39 days, and 64.06% of newborn were born in natural delivery (Table S1 in Additional file 1).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 1127)

Screening of scale items

The correlation coefficients between the scores of 11 items and the MANJS score ranged from 0.65 to 0.83, all of which were significantly correlated (P < 0.001). And the discrimination coefficient of each item was greater than 0.5, indicating strong discrimination power. Therefore, all items were retained.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value (0.89) and Bartlett’s spherical test (\({x}^{2}\)= 9859.405, P < 0.001) indicated that EFA could be performed on the scale data. Then principal component analysis and scree plot determined two factors, which explained 71.56% of the variance. After Varimax factor rotation, it was found that the factor loadings of item c2 (“Even if the doctor thought the child’s jaundice symptom was not serious, I could hardly relax”) were greater than 0.4 on the two factors, showing substantial cross-loading. As a consequence, this item was removed from the initial MANJS. The rotated factor loading matrix of 11 items is shown in Table S2 in Additional file 1.

The KMO value for the remaining 10 items was 0.87 and the Bartlett’s spherical test reported P < 0.001, so we performed EFA again. Table 2 presents the rotated factor loading matrix of 10-item scale. Factor 1 (Physical and mental reaction) contained 6 items of c3, c7, c8, c9, c10, and c11. Factor 2 (Behavioral manifestation) contained 4 items of c1, c4, c5 and c6. The variances of each factor explained were 54.87% and 19.53% respectively, and the cumulative percentage was 74.39%. These 10 items showed salient loadings on specific factors without substantial cross-loadings on the other factors.

Table 2 The rotated factor loading matrix of 10-item MANJS

Validity

Construct validity

A CFA model was constructed based on the factor structure generated by EFA. Stepwise adjustments were made to the model according to the factor loadings and the modification index (Table 3). Firstly, the model fit of 10-item CFA was not yet satisfactory. c1 (“I am afraid that jaundice will threaten my child’s health”) had cross-factor loadings that violated the basic assumptions of CFA, and given that it was conceptually inconsistent with Factor 2 (Behavioral manifestation) which it belonged to, so c1 was removed. CFA was performed again using remaining items and fit indices still did not all meet the specified criteria. c3 (“I loss sleep at night or have nightmares because I am worried about my child’s jaundice”) was deleted due to a factor loading below 0.7. Furthermore, the modification index indicated a strong error correlation between c11 (“I can’t concentrate on things because I am worried about my jaundiced child”) and c10 (“I have no appetite until my child’s jaundice subsides”), and then c11, which had a low factor loading, was removed. Ultimately, the 7-item CFA model fitted best, with all fit indices achieving a desirable or acceptable level except for χ2/df (6.272), with factor loadings above or close to 0.8 for all items. The path diagram of 7-item CFA model is shown in Fig. 1. We also analyzed the correlations between items and the correlation matrix is available in Table S3 in Additional file 1.

Table 3 Fit indices for different CFA models
Fig. 1
figure 1

7-item confirmatory factor analysis path diagram

Convergent validity and discriminant validity

The AVE of the two factors were 0.80 and 0.72, and the CR were 0.94 and 0.88 respectively, the CR values in all factors were greater than AVE (Table 4). In addition, there was a significant correlation between the scores of two factors (P < 0.01), and the correlation coefficient was 0.43, which was less than the square root of the corresponding AVE (Table 5).

Table 4 Content validity and convergent validity of MANJS
Table 5 Discriminant validity of MANJS

Content validity

The correlation coefficients between the factor scores and the MANJS score were 0.89 and 0.79, respectively, indicating statistically significant correlations (P < 0.01) (Table 4).

Reliability

Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 for MANJS, and 0.94 and 0.86 for the two factors, respectively. Split-half reliability was 0.72.

The MANJS score

The formal MANJS consists of 7 items with total scores ranging from 7 to 28 points. And the average score was 14.26 ± 4.77 among 1127 mothers, with a median score of 14.00 (10.00–17.00).

Discussion

To compensate for the lack of relevant research, this study developed the first MANJS, focusing on a specific population of mothers of jaundiced neonates. The MANJS contains 7 items and a simple two-factor structure of “Physical and mental reaction” and “Behavioral manifestation”. Multi-step items screening, reliability and validity test verified that MANJS is a reliable and accurate measurement tool.

The preliminary MANJS consisted 11 items, and the discrimination coefficients were all greater than 0.5, demonstrating that it has sufficient discrimination power to distinguish different maternal anxiety levels for neonatal jaundice. EFA revealed the cross-loadings of c2 and deleted it. Finally, EFA extracted a factor structure of 2 factors and 10 items, with a cumulative variance contribution of 74.39%, which means that 2 factors can represent most of the information in the original scale.

The initial 10-item CFA model-to-data fit was inadequate. After sequentially removing item c1, c3 and c11 that had cross-factor loadings or correlated errors, most of the fit indices in 7-item CFA model met acceptable criteria except for χ2/df. As χ2/df tends to become larger with the increase of sample size [28], the large of this indicator may be due to the large sample size in this study. Meanwhile, considering that each item has a high factor loading on the factor to which it belongs. Overall, it can be concluded that the factor structure model of the 7-item scale fitted the actual data well and the scale has a good structural validity. CR values of two factors were about 0.9, indicating that the scale has good stability in reflecting the measurement results. And the AVE value of each factor was more than 0.5, which also supports the ideal convergence validity. Meanwhile, the correlation coefficient of the two dimensions was less than 0.5 and lower than the corresponding square root of AVE, hence there was a certain correlation and a certain degree of differentiation between the two dimensions, indicating that the MANJS has satisfactory discriminant validity [34, 35]. Furthermore, there were strong correlations between 2 factor scores and the total scale score, indicating that the two dimensions and MANJS reflected essentially the same content, which validates the content validity of the scale to some extent.

Reliability is used to reflect the stability and consistency of the scale’s measurement results. Relevant studies point out that if the length of the scale is too short, the value of Cronbach’s alpha will be reduced [36]. Although there are only 7 items in MANJS, Cronbach’s Alpha of the entire scale was far beyond the acceptable value, as were the Alpha values for the two factors, and the split-half reliability was above 0.7, reflecting the good internal consistency of MANJS.

The 2 factors of 7-item scale reflect the psychophysiological reactions and externalized behaviors of mothers for neonatal jaundice, respectively, which is largely consistent with the theoretical dimensions initially set out. The emotional anxiety and somatic anxiety are both part of the former dimension. Due to traditional cultural and social attitudes, Chinese express their emotions in a more euphemistic manner, while public stigma and self-stigma of mental illness are prevalent [37], thus individual emotions are often expressed through somatic forms. The latter dimension reflects mother’s behavior in seeking security and dependence in the face of neonatal jaundice.

As a specific tool for the assessment of maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice, MANJS has prominent advantages. On the one hand, all the validation indicators showed that MANJS has good reliability and validity, which means that it can accurately evaluate the anxiety level of the mothers. On the other hand, during the scale preparation period, we took full account of the physical condition of the postpartum women. The final scale is relatively short, so it is highly practical. Accordingly, the MANJS is qualified to be a routine screening tool for the psychological condition of postpartum mothers in clinical care practice. Besides, we emphasize the measurement of maternal anxiety under specific circumstances (neonatal jaundice), which is not only conducive to identify the source of anxiety, but also conducive to the provision of personalized postpartum care, and it is of great significance for the maintenance of postpartum mental health.

Several limitations in this study should be noted. Firstly, we were unable to examine the criterion-related validity of the MANJS due to the lack of a “gold standard” to assess maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice. Meanwhile, the interval of repeated measurement is generally 2 weeks for test-retest reliability. Considering the short duration of jaundice in most neonates, we did not obtain test-retest reliability of the scale. Secondly, in the process of CFA, 3 items were removed, mainly due to the existence of correlated errors and cross-factor loadings, which result in certain discrepancies between the final 7-item MANJS and the original scale. In the future, further refinement of MANJS within the conceptual and theoretical framework of anxiety may be required. Thirdly, the χ2/df of CFA model failed to meet statistical requirement. To verify the issue that χ2/df is susceptible to sample size, we randomly selected 500 and 300 samples from the total sample of 1127 for CFA, and found that the χ2/df of 7-item model dropped to 3.467 and 2.915 respectively, while other indices remained relatively stable (Table S4 in Additional file 1). Therefore, it can be demonstrated that sample size is the main possible reason for the high χ2/df in this study. Fourthly, pre-survey and formal questionnaire survey were only carried out in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan province, so the samples may lack adequate representativeness, which limited the generalizability of the MANJS. Therefore, it is necessary to validate the scale in a larger population before it was widely used in care practice.

Conclusions

The MANJS developed in this study has good psychometric properties in Chinese postpartum women who had a jaundiced neonate. The scale contains two dimensions of “physical and mental reaction” and “behavioral manifestation”, and it can be used for timely screening for the maternal anxiety caused by neonatal jaundice, thus helping to provide personalized and targeted intervention measures to them. This study fills the gap of scale research in this field, but it still needs to be validated in a larger, especially cross-cultural target populations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to limitations of ethical approval involving the patient data and anonymity but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MANJS:

Maternal Anxiety for Neonatal Jaundice Scale

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

STAI:

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

SAS:

Self-Rating Anxiety Scale

EFA:

Exploratory factor analysis

CFA:

Confirmatory factor analysis

GFI:

Goodness of fit index

AGFI:

Adjusted goodness of fit index

SRMR:

Standardized root mean square residual

RMSEA:

Root mean square error of approximation

NFI:

Normed fit index

CFI:

Comparative fit index

TLI:

Tucker-Lewis index

IFI:

Incremental fit index

AVE:

Average variance extracted values

CR:

Combined reliability

KMO:

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin

References

  1. Olusanya BO, Osibanjo FB, Slusher TM. Risk factors for severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117229.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Moreno MA. Common questions about neonatal jaundice. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):296.doi. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang L, Liu W, Hou K, Lin J, Song C, Zhou C, Huang B, Tong X, Wang J, Rhine W, et al. Air pollution exposure associates with increased risk of neonatal jaundice. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3741. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2015167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman JH, Watson GR, Stubbs B: Anxiety disorders in postpartum women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016:292–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.033.

  5. Pawluski JL, Lonstein JS, Fleming AS. The Neurobiology of Postpartum Anxiety and Depression. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(2):106–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spielberger CD: The Effects of Anxiety on Complex Learning and Academic Achievement. Elsevier Inc. 1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3131-0.50019-6.

  7. Endler NS, Kocovski NL. State and trait anxiety revisited. J Anxiety Disord. 2001;15(3):231–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00060-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Endler NS, Parker JD, Bagby RM, Cox BJ. Multidimensionality of state and trait anxiety: factor structure of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1991;60(6):919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.919.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Forrest SJ, Siegert RJ, Krgeloh CU, Landon J, Medvedev ON. Generalizability theory distinguishes between state and trait anxiety. Psychol Assess. 2021;33(11):1080–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R, Dennis CL. Prevalence and risk factors for comorbid postpartum depressive symptomatology and anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2016;198(2):142-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips J, Sharpe L, Matthey S, Charles M. Maternally focused worry. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009;12(6):409–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0091-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell OM, Cegolon L, Macleod D, Benova L. Length of Stay After Childbirth in 92 Countries and Associated Factors in 30 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Compilation of Reported Data and a Cross-sectional Analysis from Nationally Representative Surveys. PLoS Med. 2016;13(3):e1001972. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001972.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutcuoglu S, Dursun S, Halicioglu O, Ozturk C, Akman S, Yaprak I, Ozer E. Evaluation of maternal knowledge level about neonatal jaundice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1387–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.636095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polizzi C, Perricone G, Morales MR, Burgio S. A Study of Maternal Competence in Preterm Birth Condition, during the Transition from Hospital to Home: An Early Intervention Program’s Proposal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Motegi T, Watanabe Y, Fukui N, Ogawa M, Hashijiri K, Tsuboya R, Sugai T, Egawa J, Araki R, Haino K, et al. Depression, Anxiety and Primiparity are Negatively Associated with Mother-Infant Bonding in Japanese Mothers. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:3117-3122. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S287036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Daglar G, Nur N. Level of mother-baby bonding and influencing factors during pregnancy and postpartum period. Psychiatr Danub. 2018;30(4):433–40. https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2018.433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fairbrother N, Young AH, Janssen P, Antony MM, Tucker E. Depression and anxiety during the perinatal period. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0526-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakić Radoš S, Tadinac M, Herman R. Anxiety During Pregnancy and Postpartum: Course, Predictors and Comorbidity with Postpartum Depression. Acta Clin Croat. 2018;57(1):39–51. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2017.56.04.05.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Self Evaluation Questionnaire. 1970.

  20. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3182(71)71479-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck TA, Epstein, Brown AR, Steer. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;47:343–52. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.56.6.893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zung William WK. The Differentiation of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: A Biometric Approach. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71480-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y1 – Y2). Consulting Psychogyists Press. 1983.

  26. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(4):466–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936–49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):141–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Steiger JH. Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bentler P, Bonett M, Douglas G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88(3):588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 2012;40(1):8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J Market Res. 1981;24(2):337–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hou G, Fang Z, Cao W, Shi Y, Xu X, Han M, Dong J. Development and validation of a diabetes mellitus treatment adherence scale. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;172:108629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Milani D, Alexandre NMC, Campos J, Hogg-Johnson S. Psychometric Properties of the Obstacles to Return-to-Work Questionnaire in a Brazilian context. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(4):530–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9684-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–5. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry. 2002;1(1):16–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the medical staff in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan province for their great support to this study. And we also appreciate the active cooperation of all respondents in the investigation.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 71663016]. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. XY, LF and NS conceived and designed the study. LF and QL conducted the survey. QY and DL managed the literature searches, participated in the investigation, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. YG provided methodological guidance. XY, YG, NJ, XP revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lichun Fan or Yanhong Gong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province (reference number: HNWCMC201605). All the respondents participated voluntarily and informed consent was obtained before the investigation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Q., Li, D., Yin, X. et al. Development and validation of a maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice scale in China. BMC Psychiatry 22, 526 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04161-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04161-1

Keywords

  • Neonatal jaundice
  • Maternal anxiety
  • Scale validation
  • Delivery of health care