Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and predictors of nomophobia among the general population in two middle eastern countries

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 520 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nomophobia is a psychological condition caused by a fear of disconnecting from others through mobile phones.

Aim

This study aims to determine the prevalence of and predictors of nomophobia and anxiety symptoms among the general population in Saudi Arabia and Jordan.

Methods

This study was an observational cross-sectional study using a web-based online survey distributed in two middle eastern countries (Saudi Arabia and Jordan) between Jun 24 and Jul 20, 2021. A convenience sample was used to recruit the study participants. Categorical variables were identified as frequencies and percentages. In addition, a binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with nomophobia symptoms. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 27 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), analyzed the data.

Results

A total of 5,191 responded to the online survey. Around (26.5%) reported that they suffer from an anxiety problem or use a treatment for anxiety. The median daily time spent using a mobile phone (IQR) (minutes) was around 210 min per day. About half of the study sample (51.2%) are diagnosed with dependence syndrome. The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that those within the age group of 30–49 years and 50 years and above) are less likely to have mobile phone dependence compared to those less than 30 years old. Females were 16% at lower risk of developing mobile phone dependence compared to males Married participants were less likely to have mobile phone dependence compared to single participants (OR: 0.62 (95% CI 0.56–0.70)), while divorced participants were at a 46% higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence.

Conclusion

Nomophobia prevalence among Saudi Arabia and Jordon's population is 51.2%. Several factors may predict mobile phone dependence including age, gender, marital status, and previous history of anxiety.

Peer Review reports

Background

Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental illnesses worldwide and in the middle east [1]. It is associated with other mental conditions, such as depression, substance abuse, and a higher suicidal rate [2]. It is also associated with elevated cardiovascular risk factors and a higher rate of cardiovascular diseases [3]. Anxiety is a significant burden for many societies. Globally, the estimated cost of scaling up treatment, primarily psychosocial counseling and antidepressant medication, amounted to US$ 147 billion [4]. According to a systematic review and a meta-analysis conducted in 2013, the prevalence of anxiety disorders ranged from 0.9% to 28.3% [5]. In Saudi Arabia, anxiety disorders account for 12.3%, which is the most common disorder [6].

Smartphones have become a standard tool to help people in their regular daily activities [7]. More than 200 virtual social networks have developed and exist today, including Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram [8]. Due to excessive smartphone utilization, people are susceptible to unlimited psychological problems, such as Nomophobia [9]. Nomophobia is a psychological condition caused by a fear of disconnecting from others through mobile phones [10]. It can also be defined as the fear of not being able to utilize the services and applications of the mobile phone, and not being able to communicate to others [11]. Nomophobia is also associated with a lower self-esteem and extrovert personality [10]. Nomophobia may also exacerbate other mental disorders, such as a social phobia or social anxiety [10]. Factors such as increased in the duration of using smartphones, daily usage time, daily frequency of checking smartphones, and daily mobile internet usage time may increase the level of anxiety and fear of disconnecting from mobile phones.

Globally, The prevalence of Nomophobia was 70.76% for moderate to severe cases and 20.81% for severe cases, with university students being the most affected group [12]. In the United Kingdom (UK), the UK post office reported that around 53% of the population suffer from anxiety and fear when disconnected from their smartphone [13]. Similarly, other studies reported a high prevalence rate of nomophobia among students and health care professionals [14,15,16]. However, data on the prevalence and factors associated with Nomophobia in the middle east among the general population are lacking. Accordingly, this research aimed to determine the prevalence of and predictors of nomophobia and anxiety symptoms among the general population in Saudi Arabia and Jordan.

Methods

Study design and study population

This study was an observational cross-sectional study using a web-based online survey distributed in two middle eastern countries (Saudi Arabia and Jordan) between Jun 24 and Jul 20, 2021.

Sampling strategy

A convenience sample of eligible participants was used to recruit the study participants. Participants were invited to participate in this study through social media (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram). The study sample was invited using a survey link. Since all participants volunteered for the study, they were not required to provide written informed consent. Study aims and objectives were clearly explained at the beginning of the invitation letter of the survey.

The inclusion criteria were participants aged 18 years and above and living in Saudi Arabia or Jordan.

The survey link was re-posted weekly to increase response and make the survey more accessible to the general population.

Questionnaire tool

A previously developed questionnaire by Aggarwal et al. was used to achieve the study objectives [17]. The original survey included 20 questions, and its purpose was to gather data on mobile usage patterns and determine whether or not they matched the ICD-10 criteria for substance dependence syndrome. The first three questions asked about the number of years spent using a mobile phone, the average daily usage time, and the reason for use. The remaining 20 questions were in the form of a questionnaire with a binary (yes/no) response option that inquired about respondents' mobile usage habits and whether they fulfilled the ICD-10 criteria for dependent syndrome. Six ICD-10 dependency syndrome criteria were addressed by 14 of the 20 items (one question for intense desire, four questions for impaired control, three questions for withdrawal, one question for tolerance, four questions for decreased pleasure, and one question for harmful use). If a participant responded "yes" to all of the questions in a single-question criteria or "yes" to at least half of the questions in multiple-question criteria, they were considered to have met the criterion. If three or more of the ICD-10 dependent criteria were met by the participants, they were considered to have a mobile phone dependence. The 20 items that addressed mobile dependence were scored by giving one point to each positive (yes) response from participants to determine how dependent they were on their mobile devices. The higher the score the more dependent on their mobile device. The questionnaire was translated into Arabic using the forward–backward method and then used in this study.

Sample size

The target sample size was estimated based on the WHO recommendations for the minimal sample size needed for a prevalence study [18]. This study used a confidence interval of 95%, a standard deviation of 0.5, and a margin of error of 5%. The required sample size was 385 participants.

Ethical statement

The Research Ethics Committee approved this study at Umm Al Qura University, College of Medicine. Participants were informed that completing the questionnaire is considered as written consent to participate.

Statistical analysis

The (SPSS) Statistical Package for Social Science software, version 27 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), was used to analyze the data. Categorical variables were identified as frequencies and percentages. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with nomophobia symptoms. The cut-off point for the logistic regression was fulfilling three or more of the ICD-10 criteria for substance dependence syndrome. A confidence interval of 95% (P 0.05) was used to determine the statistical significance of the results, with a predetermined level of significance of 5%

Results

Demographics characteristics

A total of 5,191 responded to the online survey. Most of the participants were from Saudi Arabia (85%). More than half of the study participants (69%) were females aged below 50 years (87%). Around 66.5% reported holding a bachelor's degree. About half of the study participants (52.9%) were single, while 42.3% were married; however, more single participants (57.4%) were included in the Saudi Arabia sample than in the Jordanian sample (26.7%). Around (26.5%) reported that they suffer from an anxiety problem or use a treatment for anxiety. The median daily time spent using a mobile phone (IQR) (minutes) was around 210 min per day. Table 1 below illustrates the demographic background of the study participants.

Table 1 Participants demographic characteristics
Full size table

Mobile phone use pattern

Most of the study participants reported that they lose track of time after starting to use mobile phones for (SMS, games, or music) (71.9%), and (73.3%) get irritated in the morning if they do not locate their mobile phone. Around half of the sample size (49.3%) reported that mobile phone use has made them spend less time with friends or family. In addition, around (42.2%) reported that they become anxious about missing something when they have to switch off their mobile phone for some reason. However, around (56%) reported that using a mobile phone helps them overcome bad moods (e.g. feeling of inferiority, helplessness, guilt, anxiety, and depression). Details of the pattern of the study participants' responses regarding their mobile use pattern are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Participants response to the questionnaire items
Full size table

Participants' mobile dependence score

The mean mobile phone dependence score for the Jordanian participants was lower than that for the Saudi population with 7.05 (± 4.00) compared to 8.49 (± 4.63). Details of the participants' mean mobile phone dependence scores stratified by their demographic characteristics are listed in Table 3.

Table 3 Participants mean mobile phone dependence score stratified by their demographic characteristics
Full size table

ICD-10 criteria for mobile dependence syndrome

Table 4 presents the study participants who fulfil the ICD-10 criteria for mobile dependence syndrome. About half of the study sample (51.2%) are diagnosed (symptomatically according to ICD-10 criteria for dependence syndrome). The most common dependence criteria across the study sample were withdrawal and impaired control (60.1%) and (55.5%), respectively. The harmful use was the least common (23.7%).

Table 4 ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for mobile dependence syndrome
Full size table

Risk factors of mobile phone dependence

The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that those within the age group of 30–49 years and 50 years and above) are less likely to have mobile phone dependence compared to those less than 30 years old (OR: 0.85 (95% CI 0.76–0.96), p < 0.01), and (OR: 0.44 (95% CI 0.37–0.52), p < 0.001). Females were 16% at lower risk of developing mobile phone dependence compared to males (Odds ratio (OR): 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.95), p ≤ 0.01). Married participants were less likely to have mobile phone dependence compared to single participants (OR: 0.62 (95% CI 0.56–0.70), p < 0.001), while divorced participants were at a 46% higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence (OR: 1.46 (95% CI 1.06–2.00), p < 0.05). Participants who have reported having anxiety problems or using a treatment for anxiety were at higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence by 75% (OR: 2.17 (95% CI 1.91–2.47), p < 0.001), Table 5.

Table 5 Binary logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

The COVID-19 epidemic has impacted the mental health of a wide range of people, including the general public, healthcare professionals, and university students. All studies agree that the epidemic has increased people's stress levels, increasing their risk of developing anxiety, depression, and other mental illnesses [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. This study was a cross-sectional web-based survey in Saudi Arabia and Jordan. It aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with nomophobia in the general population. The result showed similar proportions of people who suffer from anxiety problems or use a treatment for anxiety in Saudi Arabia (26.5%) and Jordan (28.4%).

ICD-10 criteria for mobile phone syndrome demonstrated that around half of the sample (51.2%) are diagnosed with mobile phone dependence. According to the requirements (60.1%) were withdrawn, and (55.5%) had impaired control. Additionally, our study discovered that 73.3% of the participants developed a fear of being without their mobile phones and that approximately 71.9% spent time on their phones for SMS, games, or music, which could be attributed to the exceptional circumstance of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019. All governments tried to identify and use new digital communication because all venues and local businesses were shut down, and national lockdowns were imposed [28].

The median daily time for phone use in Saudi Arabia was (210 min), while in Jordan was (140 min). So, compared to Jordan, people in KSA more frequently use mobile phones, maybe due to the COVID19 pandemic and the 2030 vision that aimed to use electronic communication and information technology [29]. Moreover, the Saudi population's mean mobile phone dependence score was higher than that of the Jordan population with 8.49 (SD: 4.63) compared to 7.05 (SD: 4.00). Thus, it may increase anxiety to be continually connected to their mobile phone [30].

Our results showed that the students also are more likely to have mobile phone dependence. It could be due to the impact of COVID-19 to continue tutoring and assessing via virtual classes [31]. According to our study's findings, the younger age (18–29) year appear to be at higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence than other age groups; these findings are consistent with the previous study conducted in 2019 [32], and these results might be explained by the fact that young people are more familiar with modern technologies and tools than people of other ages [33]. For example, whereas people above 30 are less likely to get mobile phone dependence, it could be that they are preoccupied with other things such as work and raising children [33].

Duration of mobile phone use compared to India in between 18–29 years of age group, in KSA the majority were using mobile phone for more than ten years 55.9%, and 60.6% in Jordan, on the other hand only 13.29% in India [34]. This points out that the use of phones in Saudi Arabia and Jordan was earlier in age compared to India. Another study conducted in Bangalore reported that the mobile phone addiction level in people who used the mobile phone under thirteen years was higher than in the older age group [35]. Therefore, the increased number of years of use of mobile phones is highly associated with mobile dependence. So, it could be one of the risk factors for developing nomophobia among this age group.

Another exciting finding in our sample is that multivariate effects results indicate that gender effect on nomophobia was statistically significant, and the male gender tends to have a higher risk of mobile dependence than females. This is similar to the findings reported by the previous studies [32, 36]. However, this is inconsistent with other studies in the literature where women are more likely to suffer from nomophobia in many countries like Turkey and India [32, 37]. Also, a survey in Bahrain detects more severe Nomophobia in females (21.7%) rather than males (18.8%) [38]. In contrast, some previous studies showed no significant gender differences [31, 34]. Gender differences may be due to men believing that mobile phone technology increases their independence. At the same time, women use mobile phones primarily for communication, social networking, and staying connected with friends and family, which could explain why females are less likely to have mobile dependence [32].

A study in Brazil [39] showed that 68% of total participants reported mobile phone dependency. Participants with panic disorder would have significantly more emotional symptoms and reliance on mobile phones than the control group if access to their mobile phones were restricted. In our study, the binary logistic regression results also showed that participants who have reported having anxiety problems or using a treatment for anxiety were at a higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence by 75%.

Participants with the panic disorder would have significantly more emotional symptoms and dependency on mobile phones than the control group if access to their mobile phones were restricted. In our study, the binary logistic regression results also showed that participants who have reported having anxiety problems or using a treatment for anxiety were at a higher risk of developing mobile phone dependence by 75% [40]. This study discovered intriguing associations between a higher risk of problematic smartphone use and married and divorced respondents than never-married respondents. Being married is associated with a more frequent use of telephone calls, instant messaging, and e-mail for family communication when compared to those who are single, which may contribute to a more reliant use of smartphones [40]. On the contrary, problematic use of smartphone functions unrelated to family communication, such as online video gaming, may exacerbate family relationships and contribute to marital breakdown [40].

The difference between Saudi Arabia's and Jordan's results could be attributed to different samples, economic disparities, personality types, and the impact of other variables such as age and environmental factors. There are also significant economic differences between the nations, influencing smartphone use and the prevalence of smartphone ownership between centuries. As a result, the form of smartphone addiction [41]. Furthermore, it could be because the amount of 4G Wi-Fi coverage in Saudi Arabia has increased [41].

The study is volubility to mental health care results from the correlation between nomophobia and anxiety and stress. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of nomophobia and its associated factors and recommend initiating a therapeutic strategy and preventing it through awareness programs. Further research should be conducted to ascertain the reasons for this population's increased cell phone use, explore the relationship between nomophobia and other risk factors among university students throughout the kingdom, and support individuals diagnosed with severe nomophobia. We should consider this a critical issue in mental health care, given the numerous connections to psychological problems and the varying consequences for the individual's life. Therefore, with the increasing incidence of stress every year in growing and developed countries, it is vital to focus on the awareness of the general population about the consequences long term dependency on mobile phones, which is one of the critical factors associated with developing anxiety in the modern life.

To our knowledge, no research has been done in Saudi Arabia and Jordan to include all age groups; also, our study has a large sample size among the general population, whereas other studies in the region focus on undergraduate students; and it sheds light on the prevalence of nomophobia, which can aid researchers in assessing nomophobic tendencies and recognizing possible risk factors.

Our study has an unavoidable limitation; firstly, our study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted using a web-based online survey (Twitter, Snapchat, and WhatsApp), and therefore, it might have a recall bias. However, owing to the current epidemic and the nature of the objective of this study, we assume that we targeted a well-representative sample. Secondly, due to the nature of the study design, we could not confirm any association between the predictors and nomophobia. Thirdly, because most participants were between 18 and 29, generalizing the study to all age groups is difficult. Additionally, since that the study was a self-reported online survey and our objectives were about smartphones, it might have induced social desirability bias. In addition, a self-administered questionnaire through an online platform could be biased.

Conclusion

Our study concludes that the prevalence of nomophobia among the general population in two middle eastern countries is 51.2%. Moreover, age, gender, marital status, and previous history of anxiety may play an essential role in developing mobile phone dependence.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

SD:

Standard Deviation

ICD:

International Classification of Diseases

WHO:

World Health Organization

USA:

United States of America

COVID:

Corona virus diseases

References

  1. Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(3):327–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boden JM, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Anxiety disorders and suicidal behaviours in adolescence and young adulthood: findings from a longitudinal study. Psychol Med. 2007;37(3):431–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kandola A, et al. Moving to Beat Anxiety: Epidemiology and Therapeutic Issues with Physical Activity for Anxiety. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(8):63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chisholm D, et al. Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(5):415–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baxter AJ, et al. Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression. Psychol Med. 2013;43(5):897–910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altwaijri YA, et al. Twelve-month prevalence and severity of mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2020;29(3):e1831–e1831.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J-H, Seo M, David P. Alleviating depression only to become problematic mobile phone users: Can face-to-face communication be the antidote? Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51:440–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeri-Yabar A, et al. Association between social media use (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook) and depressive symptoms: Are Twitter users at higher risk? Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019;65(1):14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Darvishi M, et al. Investigating Different Dimensions of Nomophobia among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2019;7(4):573–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhattacharya S, et al. NOMOPHOBIA: NO MObile PHone PhoBIA. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(4):1297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonçalves, S., P. Dias, and A.P. Correia, Nomophobia and lifestyle: Smartphone use and its relationship to psychopathologies. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2020. 2.

  12. Humood A, et al. The Prevalence of Nomophobia by Population and by Research Tool: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression. Psych. 2021;3(2):249–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahl, R.R.D., D, Nomophobia. In Substance Abuse and Addiction: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice. 2019: IGI Globa. 12.

  14. Gokani N, et al. Irrational fear of being away from smartphone among health-care workers: An observational study. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;37(3):295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qutishat M, et al. University students’ nomophobia prevalence, sociodemographic factors and relationship with academic performance at a University in Oman. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100206.

  16. Farooq M, Rizvi MA, Wajid WA, Ashraf M, Farooq M, Javed H, Sadiq MA, Jafar HM, Hameed F, Rizvi MA, Tayyba A. Prevalence of Nomophobia and an Analysis of Its Contributing Factors in the Undergraduate Students of Pakistan. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022;25(2):147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aggarwal M, Grover S, Basu D. Mobile phone use by resident doctors: Tendency to addiction-like behaviour. German J Psychiatry. 2012;15:50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naing NN. Determination of sample size. Malays J Med Sci. 2003;10(2):84–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Alqahtani, J.S., et al., Sleep Quality, Insomnia, Anxiety, Fatigue, Stress, Memory and Active Coping during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022. 19(9).

  20. Abuhamdah SMA et al. The Prevalence of Mental Distress and Social Support among University Students in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(21).

  21. Alyami HS, et al. Depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(7).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Varghese A, et al. Decline in the mental health of nurses across the globe during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:05009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alsairafi Z et al. Mental Health Status of Healthcare Professionals and Students of Health Sciences Faculties in Kuwait during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(4).

  24. Naser AY, et al. The effect of the 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak on social relationships: A cross-sectional study in Jordan. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(6):664–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naser AY, et al. Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: A cross-sectional study. Brain Behav. 2020;10(8).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abukhalaf AHI, Cohen S. COVID-19’s Negative Mental Health Impact Goes Well Beyond Standard At-Risk Populations: Action Needs To Be Taken to Combat Long-term Nationwide Emotional Disruption. Academia Letters, 2021.

  27. Abukhalaf AHI, Cohen S. The Growing Mental Health Crisis Among America's Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. Academia Letters, 2022.

  28. Nguyen MH et al. Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research. Social Media + Society, 2020. 6(3): p. 2056305120948255.

  29. Hassounah M, Raheel H, Alhefzi M. Digital Response During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Saudi Arabia. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19338–e19338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Sayed Desouky D, Abu-Zaid H. Mobile phone use pattern and addiction in relation to depression and anxiety. East Mediterr Health J, 2020. 26(6): p. 692–699.

  31. Alkhalaf S, et al. E-Learning system on higher education institutions in KSA: Attitudes and perceptions of faculty members. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;47:1199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Notara V, et al. The Emerging Phenomenon of Nomophobia in Young Adults: A Systematic Review Study. Addict Health. 2021;13(2):120–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Olson KE, et al. Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of Use for Younger and Older Adults. Ageing Int. 2011;36(1):123–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Khilnani AK, Thaddanee R, Khilnani G. Prevalence of nomophobia and factors associated with it: a cross-sectional study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7:468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashe S, Routray D, Giri R. Nomophobia: mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college in Central Odisha, India. Int J Comm Med Public Health. 2019;6:4011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thapa K, et al. Mobile Phone Dependence among Undergraduate Students of a Medical College of Eastern Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(224):234–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. León-Mejía AC, et al. A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jahrami H et al. The Association between Symptoms of Nomophobia, Insomnia and Food Addiction among Young Adults: Findings of an Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021. 18(2).

  39. King ALS, et al. "Nomophobia": impact of cell phone use interfering with symptoms and emotions of individuals with panic disorder compared with a control group. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH. 2014;10:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luk TT, et al. Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in Chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(4):1157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bursan, I., et al., National, Sex and Academic Discipline Difference in Smartphone Addiction: A Study of Students in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Sudan. Commun Mental Health J. 2019. 55.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No fund was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

    Hassan Alwafi & Mohammed Samannodi

  2. Department of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan

    Abdallah Y. Naser

  3. Respiratory Therapy Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

    Abdulelah M. Aldhahir

  4. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

    Alaa Idrees Fatani, Rahaf Awaili Alharbi, Khawlah Ghazi Alharbi & Braah Ali Almutwakkil

  5. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Emad Salawati

  6. School of Public Health and Health Informatics, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia

    Rakan Ekram

  7. Department of Pediatrics, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed A. Almatrafi

  8. Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Wael Rammal

  9. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

    Hamza Assaggaf

  10. College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Jumanah T. Qedair & Abdullah A. Al Qurashi

  11. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Jumanah T. Qedair & Abdullah A. Al Qurashi

  12. Independent researcher, Mecca, Saudi Arabia

    Afnan Alqurashi

Authors
  1. Hassan Alwafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdallah Y. Naser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulelah M. Aldhahir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alaa Idrees Fatani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rahaf Awaili Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Khawlah Ghazi Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Braah Ali Almutwakkil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Emad Salawati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rakan Ekram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mohammed Samannodi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mohammed A. Almatrafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Wael Rammal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hamza Assaggaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jumanah T. Qedair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Abdullah A. Al Qurashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Afnan Alqurashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, HA, AYN; Data curation, HA, AN, AF, RA, KA, BA; Formal analysis, HA, AYN; Investigation, HA, AYN; Methodology, HA, AYN; Project administration; HA, AYN, MS, AA; Supervision, HA, AYN, MS; Validation, HA, AYN; Writing original draft, HA, AYN, AF, RA, KA, BA, HS, AA, ES; Writing – review & editing, All authors. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdallah Y. Naser.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the faculty of Medicine at the University of Umm Alqura, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alwafi, H., Naser, A.Y., Aldhahir, A.M. et al. Prevalence and predictors of nomophobia among the general population in two middle eastern countries. BMC Psychiatry 22, 520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04168-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04168-8

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us