Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the French validation and the original study

From: Further validation of the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis

 

Control Group

N = 576

Psychosis Group

N = 31

Depression Group

N = 31

Scale

Current study

Original study

Current study

Original study

Current study

Original study

Total score

40.9 (4.6)

36.5 (2.7)

47.3 (8.9)

47.3 (10.4)

41.3 (7.0)

45.5 (9.4)

Theme

 Threatening Events

21.1 (3.0)

19 (1.7)

25.1 (5.5)

24.6 (6.0)

21.0 (3.7)

24.7 (5.9)

 Anomalous Perceptions

19.8 (2.4)

17.5 (1.6)

22.2 (4.5)

22.7 (5.1)

20.4 (3.8)

20.8 (4.2)

Cognitive biase

 Intentionalising

7.7 (1.1)

7.3 (1.1)

8.7 (2.2)

8.8 (2.4)

7.5 (1.4)

7.7 (2.4)

 Catastrophising

8.5 (1.5)

7.1 (0.9)

9.9 (2.6)

9.5 (2.4)

8.2 (1.6)

9.1 (2.1)

 Dichotomous Thinking

7.8 (1.3)

6.5 (0.7)

9.0 (2.2)

8.8 (2.6)

7.9 (2.0)

9.5 (2.9)

 Jumping to conclusions

9.4 (1.6)

8.5 (1.3)

10.6 (1.8)

10.7 (2.5)

9.3 (1.8)

10.9 (1.9)

 Emotional Reasoning

7.6 (1.41)

7.2 (1.1)

9.1 (2.7)

9.4 (2.5)

8.4 (2.0)

8.3 (2.1)

  1. Comparison between the scores of the current study on the French validation of the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire for psychosis (CBQ(p)) and the scores of the original study (Peters et al., 2014) across the three groups. Data presented as mean (standard deviation)