Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pain, mood, and suicidal behavior among injured working adults in Chile

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 766 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic pain is comorbid with psychiatric disorders, but information on the association of chronic pain with depressive symptoms, generalized anxiety, and suicidal behavior among occupational cohorts is inadequate. We investigated these associations among employed Chilean adults.

Methods

A total of 1946 working adults were interviewed during their outpatient visit. Pain was assessed using the Short Form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPG) while depression and generalized anxiety were examined using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale was used to assess suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the association of chronic pain with mood disorders, as well as suicidal behavior.

Results

High chronic pain (SF-MPG > 11) was reported by 46% of participants. Approximately two-fifths of the study participants (38.2%) had depression, 23.8% generalized anxiety, 13.4% suicidal ideation, and 2.4% suicidal behavior. Compared to those with low pain (SF-MPG ≤11), participants with high chronic pain (SF-MPG > 11) had increased odds of experiencing depression only (aOR = 2.87; 95% CI: 2.21–3.73), generalized anxiety only (aOR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.42–3.99), and comorbid depression and generalized anxiety (aOR = 6.91; 95% CI: 5.20–9.19). The corresponding aOR (95%CI) for suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior were (aOR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.58–3.07) and (aOR = 2.18 = 95% CI: 0.99–4.79), respectively.

Conclusions

Chronic pain is associated with increased odds of depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal behavior. Mental health support and appropriate management of patients experiencing chronic pain are critical.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Chronic pain is a debilitating health condition estimated to affect 1 in 5 adults worldwide [1] with profound emotional and cognitive effects [2] and economic impacts, including loss of productivity, absenteeism due to illness, presenteeism, and loss of employment [3]. In the United States alone, 100 million adults — more than the number affected by heart disease, diabetes, and cancer combined — suffer from common chronic pain conditions, with an estimated loss in productivity due to chronic pain being $61 billion per year [4]. Several epidemiologic studies have shown associations between chronic pain and mood disorders, including generalized anxiety and depression [5,6,7,8]. More than half of people treated for depression also report problems with pain [9]. A growing body of evidence shows patients suffering from chronic physical pain are more likely to report suicidal behavior, ideation, plans, and/or attempts [10,11,12,13,14]. Of note, patients with chronic pain are at an increased risk of dying from suicide compared to those without chronic pain [13, 14]. Few previous studies have examined the association between chronic pain and depression and generalized anxiety in South America, including in Colombia [8, 15], Brazil [7, 16, 17], Paraguay [7] and Ecuador [7]. Only two of these previous studies have examined the association between pain and suicidal behaviors [18, 19], with one study reporting null findings [19].

Given that (1) few studies have examined pain with depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal behaviors in South American populations; (2) one previous study found no association between pain and suicide risk in Colombia [19], and (3) no study has been conducted in Chile, the most stable and prosperous country in South America, we conducted a larger-scale cross-sectional epidemiological study to investigate the association of chronic pain with symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal behavior among injured working adults in Chile.

Materials and methods

Study population

The sample for this study included participants of the Stress, Pain, Sleep, and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (SPLENDID) study in a workers’ compensation hospital system in Chile. The SPLENDID study was designed to examine pain, work-related stress, and neuropsychiatric outcomes in the context of injured working adults in Chile with the intention of developing workplace intervention programs. The study was conducted between September 2015 and February 2018 among patients attending the Hospital del Trabajador in Santiago, Chile. The Hospital del Trabajador is the largest workers’ compensation hospital and the referral center for trauma and professional diseases of Asociación Chilena de Seguridad, the biggest workers’ compensation system in Chile, with almost 2.5 million affiliated workers. Working adults were eligible for the study if they attended the workers’ compensation hospital for the following injuries: spinal cord, mild brain injury, bone fractures, burns, and soft tissue injuries of various etiologies. Eligible participants also must be able to read and write Spanish. All participants provided written informed consent. The institutional review boards of the Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile, and the Office of Human Research Administration, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, approved all procedures used in this study.

Analytic population

A total of 2000 participants were interviewed. Of these, 21 participants were excluded due to missing information on the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, 4 were excluded for missing information on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, 8 were excluded for missing information on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, 9 were excluded for missing data on CSSRS suicidal ideation, 22 were excluded for missing data on CSSRS suicidal behavior, and 1 participant was excluded for being outside the age range (> 85). A total of 1946 participants were included in the final analysis.

Study procedures

Pain assessment

The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPG) was used to measure current perceived pain among adults with chronic pain [20]. The SF-MPG comprises two subscales: a sensory subscale with 11 words or items and an affective subscale with 4 words or items. The sensory subscale includes items that describe the properties of the pain experienced (i.e., continuous, intermittent or neuropathic pain), whereas the affective subscale includes items that describe the emotional perception of pain (i.e., tiring-exhausting, sickening, fearful, and punishing-cruel) [21]. The items are rated on a Likert Scale for pain intensity with 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score is obtained by summing the item scores. The sensory subscale total score ranges from 0 to 33, and affective subscale total score ranges from 0 to 12. The SF-MPG total overall score ranges from 0 to 45. We used the median score of the two subscales to define high and low pain scores (SF-MPG median: 11.0, SF-MPG sensory subscale median: 9.0, SF-MPG affective subscale median: 2.0). This approach is consistent with prior studies that summarized pain scores based on their distribution in the absence of a clinical diagnostic cutoff [22, 23]. In addition, the median split is a common method used to dichotomize variables in psychological research [24, 25], and in other fields [26], and oftentimes it is viewed as a more parsimonious way to split continuous data [24]. In addition, the cut-off we used to group between low and high pain in our study was consistent with mean scores [27, 28] and median scores [29] reported in the literature for the SF-MPG.

Depressive symptoms assessment

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was used to screen participants for depression. The PHQ-9 contains 9 questions about a participants’ depression symptoms over the 14 days prior to assessment. The items were scored from 0 to 3 according to the response categories: never, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day. The total PHQ-9 score ranged from 0 to 27, and presence of depressive symptoms was defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 based on the accepted diagnostic properties for depression at this cut-off [30]. The PHQ-9 was previously validated in Spanish-speaking populations [31, 32] and specifically in the Chilean population [33].

Generalized anxiety symptoms assessment

Generalized anxiety symptoms was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 contains seven questions about generalized anxiety symptoms over the 14 days prior to assessment. Items were scored from 0 to 3 according to response categories: never, several days, more than half the days, or nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. The presence of anxiety symptoms was defined as a GAD-7 score ≥ 10, being this a reasonable cut-point to identify moderate to severe cases of GAD [34]. The GAD-7 has previously been used in Spanish-speaking populations [35, 36].

Suicidal assessment

Suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors during the past month were assessed using the Columbia Suicidal Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Screen version [37, 38]. The C-SSRS Screen is a structured interview based on the more comprehensive full-length version. The scale measures suicidal ideation severity and suicidal behavior using two subsets of items. The first subset captures suicidal ideation severity during the past month. The questions ask: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, suicidal thoughts with methods, suicidal intent, and suicidal intent with plan. The second subset measures suicidal behavior during the past three months. The questions asked about the presence of actual and aborted suicide attempts. For the purposes of the present study, suicidal ideation was defined by a “yes” answer to any one of the five suicidal ideation severity items. Suicidal behavior was defined as a “yes” answer to the suicidal behavior question. The C-SSRS has previously been validated in Spanish-speaking populations [39, 40].

Covariates

Structured questionnaires were used to determine participants’ sociodemographic and occupational characteristics. Participants age was categorized as 18–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and 75–84 years. Other sociodemographic characteristics examined were sex (male vs. female), country of birth (Chile vs. others), belonging to indigenous or native groups (no vs. yes), highest degree of education attained (elementary school, high school, college or technical training), marital status (married/living with a partner, single, previously married), body mass index (BMI; < 18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, > 30 kg/m2), lifetime smoking (no vs. yes), and lifetime alcohol consumption (no vs. yes). Participants’ occupational characteristics included work sector (construction, finance, commercial, manufacturing, public services, transportation, others), type of occupation (administrative, manual worker, professional, salesperson, technician, teacher, others), time since the accident in days (1–42 days: Acute; 43–84 days: Subacute; > 84 days: Chronic) [41, 42], type of accident (commute or work injury), and type of injury (burn, fall, cut, attrition, firearm, blunt trauma, repetitive use, others) [43].

Statistical analysis

Frequency distributions of sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were examined using mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and numbers and percentages (%) for categorical variables. Associations between pain status and sociodemographic and occupational characteristics were examined using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. The median value [25th and 75th percentiles] was calculated for time since the accident, as the distribution of these values was right-skewed. Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney test was used to evaluate differences in medians. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores were used to create categorical variables: depression or anxiety symptoms (no vs. yes); and mood disorder status (no depression or anxiety, depression only, anxiety only, or both depression and anxiety). Multivariable logistic regression procedures were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association of chronic pain with depressive symptoms, generalized anxiety symptoms, and suicidal behaviors. We fit separate models with symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety and suicidal behaviors as outcome and chronic pain as exposure. Assessment of confounders was performed by entering a priori selected putative confounders (e.g., age, sex, marital status, type of workplace and type of injury) [44,45,46] into a logistic regression model one at a time and by comparing the adjusted OR (aOR) and unadjusted ORs. Final logistic regression models included covariates that altered unadjusted ORs by at least 10%. Additionally, the suicidal ideation and behavior models included further adjustment for depression status as measured by the first eight questions of the PHQ-9 [46, 47]. Question 9 was not included since it asks about suicidal ideation (‘Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself in some way’). The PHQ-8 depression questionnaire has been demonstrated to minimally influence scale performance, mean scores, or diagnostic cut points compared with the PHQ-9 [48, 49]. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics, Version 23.0 (IBM SPSS v23.0, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 45.9 ± 13.7 years old. Participants were more likely to be men (72.9%) and born in Chile (94.1%). Only 3.2% of participants self-identified as belonging to an indigenous or native group. Most participants had at least a high school or some college education (83.9%), were married or living with a partner (62.1%) and had a lifetime history of smoking (58.4%) and alcohol consumption (61.8%). Approximately 46% of participants were classified as having high perceived chronic pain as measured by the SF-MPG. Participants with high pain were more likely to be older, men, and be more highly educated (p < 0.001; Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of a population of injured working adults in Santiago, Chile according to pain status as measured by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire a (N = 1946)
Full size table

Participants worked in the sectors of manufacturing (26.6%) or public services (21.4%). The majority of participants were most likely to classify their occupation as manual workers (58.1%). The median time since their accident was 188 days. The majority of accidents occurred during work (65.6%) and were attributed to falling (35.5%) or blunt trauma (32.6%). Participants with high pain were less likely to be manual workers, reported a longer time since the accident occurred, and were also more likely to have falling or blunt trauma injuries (p < 0.001; Table 2).

Table 2 Occupation and injury characteristics of a working adult population in Santiago, Chile according to pain status as measured by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire a (N = 1946)
Full size table

Psychiatric characteristics of the population are presented in Table 3. Overall, 38.2% of the population had depression symptoms, and 23.8% had generalized anxiety symptoms. 13.4% of the study population had suicidal ideation, and 2.4% had suicidal behavior. Participants with high pain were significantly more likely to have depression or generalized anxiety symptoms, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior (Table 3).

Table 3 Psychiatric characteristics of a population of injured working adults in Santiago, Chile according to pain status as measured by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnairea (N = 1946)
Full size table

Participants with high pain had 4.05-fold increased odds of experiencing symptoms of depression or generalized anxiety compared to those who reported low pain after adjusting for sociodemographic and occupational confounders (aOR = 4.05; 95%CI: 3.32–4.94). Compared to participants with low pain, those who reported high pain had higher odds of depression (aOR = 2.74; 95% CI: 2.13–3.52) and generalized anxiety symptoms alone (aOR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.32–3.53), and co-occurring symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety (aOR = 7.19 95% CI: 5.45–9.51). After adjusting for putative confounders, participants with high pain had 3.48-fold increased odds of reporting suicidal ideation than those with low pain (aOR = 3.70; 95%CI: 2.72–5.04). Further adjustment for depressive symptoms attenuated this association but remained strong (aOR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.68–3.27). Participants with high pain had 4.05-fold increased odds of reporting suicidal behavior compared to those with low pain (OR = 4.05; 95%CI: 1.92–8.54). After adjusting for symptoms of depression, the magnitude of the association between high pain and suicidal behavior was attenuated (OR = 2.35; 95%CI: 1.08–5.07; Table 4). We further conducted an additional analysis using the SF-MPG continuous score, and the interpretation remained the same, but the associations were largely attenuated (Supplementary Table 1). The associations between pain and symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal behaviors were similar when analyzed separately using the SF-MPG sensory pain and affective pain subscales (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

Table 4 Association of pain with depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior among a population of injured working adults in Santiago, Chile (N = 1946)
Full size table

Discussion

Pain is highly prevalent and contributes greatly to morbidity and mortality. In a review of 18 adult population surveys from 10 high-income countries (HICs) and seven low- or middle-income countries LMICs (N = 42,249), the prevalence of chronic pain was 37.3% in HICs and 41.1% in LMICs [8]. In our study of injured Chilean working adults, 46% of participants were classified as having chronic pain, and they were more likely to be older, men, current smokers, and had higher levels of education compared to participants with low pain. Our study findings and available data collectively show that chronic pain is generalized. The positive association that we observed between chronic pain and age was largely consistent with findings reported from other epidemiologic studies [50, 51]; however, the prevalence of pain across demographic characteristics such as gender and education level in our study differed from previous evidence [51], including that from a study conducted in Chile and another in Colombia [52, 53]. These differences in the prevalence of chronic pain might be attributable to differences in populations included, measurement scales used, and study designs employed.

Chronic pain was associated with depression and anxiety spectrum disorders in both LMICs and HICs [8]. In a recent review of 47 LMICs (N = 273,952), depression was significantly associated with severe pain in 44 of the 47 countries included (OR = 3.93; 95% CI 3.54–4.37) [7]. Neither of these prior reviews includes associations between pain and mood disorder symptoms in a Chilean population. This is important as chronic pain has been reported to be highly prevalent in 32% of the general population [52]. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to examine this association in a Chilean population. Taken together, our study and previous work demonstrate a robust association between chronic pain and mood disorders, including depression and anxiety.

Previous studies have examined the association between chronic pain and suicidal behaviors. Several studies conducted in the United States [54, 55], Australia [56], Canada [57], Japan [58], and India [59] have shown associations between chronic pain and suicidal ideation or behaviors. For example, among U.S. adults (N = 5692), the presence of a pain condition was significantly associated with lifetime suicidal ideation (OR = 1.4; 95%CI: 1.1–1.8) and plans (OR = 1.5; 95%CI: 1.1–2.1) [55]. Among Canadian adults over 66 years old, completed suicide was associated with moderate (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.66–2.20) and severe pain (OR = 7.52; 95% CI: 4.93–11.46). Among patients admitted for attempted suicide and controls at a teaching hospital in India (N = 137 patients and N = 137 controls), those with idiopathic pain (OR = 6.78; 95% CI: 2.39–20.76) and physical illnesses (OR = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.37–7.24) had an increased odds of suicide attempts compared to controls [59]. To our knowledge, only one study has examined the association between pain and suicide risk in South America. In an underpowered study conducted at a hospital pain clinic in Colombia (N = 49), the authors found no association between the risk of suicide and perceived levels of pain [19]. In our study, participants with high pain were more likely to report suicidal ideation; however, the association was not statistically significant.

Chronic pain is highly prevalent and is associated with increased odds of depression, generalized anxiety, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior among working Chilean adults. The findings of this study and those from other populations [54, 55], reinforce the knowledge that chronic pain and associated psychiatric symptoms may not be independent entities but rather comorbid symptoms interacting synergistically [60, 61]. This is consistent with the five most prevalent co-occurring symptom clusters labeled as the “SPADE pentad,” which include chronic pain, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and low energy/fatigue [60]. The co-occurrence of SPADE symptoms negatively affects treatment response and undermines patients’ general health, quality of life, and physical functioning [60]. The recent Institute of Medicine report indicates chronic pain is debilitating and requires immediate, appropriate treatment rather than being sidelined [2]. Given its comorbidity with psychiatric disorders, an interdisciplinary approach that addresses the burdensome co-occurring SPADE symptoms will be most promising for patients with chronic pain and optimize their quality of life and other health outcomes [60].

The results of our study are compatible with the current understanding of the biological mechanism of chronic pain and psychiatric outcomes [50, 62, 63]. Functional imaging studies suggest that this bidirectional relationship is partly attributed to shared neural mechanisms. For instance, participants experiencing lower back pain, fibromyalgia, or other types of chronic pain, show functional imaging alterations in regions responsible for the response to emotional stimuli, like the anterior cingulate cortex and the prefrontal cortex regions [64]. In comparison, participants reporting depressive symptoms showed a shift in the insula region responsible for processing emotional stimuli to a region associated with processing pain in pain-free individuals [64]. Similar evidence has been reported for anxiety and other mood disorders [64].

Some important limitations must be considered when interpreting the results of our study results. First, our study’s cross-sectional data collection design does not allow for determining the temporal relationship between chronic pain and psychiatric outcomes. Second, measures of chronic pain were mainly related to the type of work injury reported by participants at the time of enrollment in the study; thus, we were unable to account for the influence of chronic pain predating the work injury. Furthermore, our use of self-reported data in the exposure, outcome, and other covariates, may have introduced some degree of measurement error. Although we used multivariable logistic regression procedures to adjust for putative confounders, we cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding. Finally, the participants in this study were injured working adults in Santiago, Chile; thus, the results may not be generalizable to other populations.

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting this study will be provided by the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IOM: Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patel A, Farquharson R, Carroll D, Moore A, Phillips C, Taylor R, et al. The impact and burden of chronic pain in the workplace: a qualitative systematic review. Pain Pract. 2012;12(7):578–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart W, Ricci J, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. Jama. 2003;290(18):2443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Means-Christensen AJ, Roy-Byrne PP, Sherbourne CD, Craske MG, Stein MB. Relationships among pain, anxiety, and depression in primary care. Depression and Anxiety. 2008;25(7):593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen X, Cheng HG, Huang Y, Liu Z, Luo X. Depression symptoms and chronic pain in the community population in Beijing, China. Psych Res. 2012;200(2–3):313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Veronese N, Thompson T, Fornaro M, Schofield P, et al. Depression and pain: primary data and meta-analysis among 237 952 people across 47 low- and middle-income countries. Psychol Med. 2017;47(16):2906–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008;9(10):883–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Narasimhan M, Campbell N. A tale of two comorbidities: understanding the neurobiology of depression and pain. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52(2):127–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hooley JM, Franklin JC, Nock MK. Chronic pain and suicide: understanding the association. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(8):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stubbs B. The prevalence and odds of suicidal thoughts, behaviours and deaths among people with painful comorbidities: an updated meta-analysis accounting for publication bias. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;72:72–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilgen MA, Zivin K, McCammon RJ, Valenstein M. Pain and suicidal thoughts, plans and attempts in the United States. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(6):521–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calati R, Courtet P. Is psychotherapy effective for reducing suicide attempt and non-suicidal self-injury rates? Meta-analysis and meta-regression of literature data. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;79:8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy R, Sommer JL, Bolton JM, El-Gabalawy R. Understanding correlates of suicidality among those with usual pain and discomfort: a Canadian nationally representative study. J Psychosom Res. 2021;151:110651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Lee S, Posada-Villa J, Kovess V, Angermeyer MC, et al. Mental disorders among persons with chronic back or neck pain: results from the world mental health surveys. Pain. 2007;129(3):332–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira FG, Franca MH, Paiva MCA, Andrade LH, Viana MC. Prevalence and clinical profile of chronic pain and its association with mental disorders. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Depintor JD, Bracher ES, Cabral DM, Eluf-Neto J. Prevalence of chronic spinal pain and identification of associated factors in a sample of the population of Sao Paulo, Brazil: cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2016;134(5):375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fanger P, Azevedo R, Mauro M, Lima D, Gaspar K, Silva V, et al. Depression and suicidal behavior of cancer inpatients: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1992;56(2):17308.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amaya Arias AC, Bruce A, Herrán D, Martín Arango A, Muñoz K, Abella P. Variables associated with the risk of suicide in patients with chronic pain seen in a hospital outpatient clinic in Bogotá. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2013;41(4):267–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jumbo SU, MacDermid JC, Packham TL, Athwal GS, Faber KJ. Reproducibility: reliability and agreement parameters of the revised short McGill pain questionnaire Version-2 for use in patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair AS, Diwan S. Pain scores and statistical analysis—the conundrum. Ain-Sham Journ of Anesth. 2020;12(1):35.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim TK. Practical statistics in pain research. Korean J Pain. 2017;30(4):243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeCoster J, Gallucci M. Iselin A-MR: best practices for using median splits, artificial categorization, and their continuous alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2011;2(2):197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia D, MacDonald S, Archer T. Two different approaches to the affective profiles model: median splits (variable-oriented) and cluster analysis (person-oriented). PeerJ. 2015;3:e1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iacobucci D, Posavac SS, Kardes FR, Schneider MJ, Popovich DL. Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. J Consum Psychol. 2015;25(4):652–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keilani M, Crevenna R, Dorner TE. Sleep quality in subjects suffering from chronic pain. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018;130(1):31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitisomprayoonkul W, Klaphajone J, Kovindha A. Thai short-form McGill pain questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thail. 2006;89(6):846–53.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alharbi HA, Albabtain MA, Alobiad N, Aba Alhasan J, Alruhaimi M, Alnefisah M, et al. Pain perception assessment using the short-form McGill pain questionnaire after cardiac surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(3):343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. Cmaj. 2012;184(3):E191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wulsin L, Somoza E, Heck J. The feasibility of using the Spanish PHQ-9 to screen for depression in primary care in Honduras. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002;4(5):191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhong Q, Gelaye B, Fann JR, Sanchez SE, Williams MA. Cross-cultural validity of the Spanish version of PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women: a Rasch item response theory analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014;158:148–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baader M. JL M, Venezian S, Rojas C, Farías R, Fierro-Freixenet C, Backenstrass M, C M: Validación y utilidad de la encuesta PHQ-9 (patient health questionnaire) en el diagnóstico de depresión en pacientes usuarios de atención primaria en Chile. Revista chilena de neuro-psiquiatría. 2012;50(1):10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. García-Campayo J, Zamorano E, Ruiz M, Pardo A, Pérez-Páramo M, López-Gómez V, et al. Cultural adaptation into Spanish of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale as a screening tool. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(8):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhong QY, Gelaye B, Zaslavsky AM, Fann JR, Rondon MB, Sanchez SE, et al. Diagnostic validity of the generalized anxiety disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among pregnant women. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Posner K, Brown G, Stanley B, Brent D, Yershova K, Oquendo M, et al. The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Conway PM, Erlangsen A, Teasdale TW, Jakobsen IS, Larsen KJ. Predictive validity of the Columbia-suicide severity rating scale for short-term suicidal behavior: a Danish study of adolescents at a high risk of suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 2017;21(3):455–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Halabí S, Sáiz P, Burón P, Garrido M, Benabarre A, Jiménez E, et al. Validation of a Spanish version of the Columbia-suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS). Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016;9(3):134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Serrani Azcurra D. Psychometric validation of the Columbia-suicide severity rating scale in Spanish-speaking adolescents. Colombia médica. 2017;48(4):174–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Frank J, Brooker A, DeMaio S, Kerr M, Maetzel A, Shannon H, et al. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: what do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine. 1996;15(21):2918–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, Oranye N, Passmore S, Van Eerd D, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with sub acute and chronic low Back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):369–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Velez JC, Friedman LE, Barbosa C, Castillo J, Juvinao-Quintero DL, Williams MA, et al. Evaluating the performance of the pain interference index and the short form McGill pain questionnaire among Chilean injured working adults. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ratcliffe GE, Enns MW, Belik SL, Sareen J. Chronic pain conditions and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: an epidemiologic perspective. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(3):204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Milner A, Spittal MJ, Pirkis J, LaMontagne AD. Suicide by occupation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(6):409–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rossom RC, Coleman KJ, Ahmedani BK, Beck A, Johnson E, Oliver M, et al. Suicidal ideation reported on the PHQ9 and risk of suicidal behavior across age groups. J Affect Disord. 2017;215:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ribeiro JD, Huang X, Fox KR, Franklin JC. Depression and hopelessness as risk factors for suicide ideation, attempts and death: meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212(5):279–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J, Lowe B. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):345–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kroenke K, Strine T, Spitzer R, Williams J, Berry J, Mokdad A. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009;114(1–3):163–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):e273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Portenoy RK, Ugarte C, Fuller I, Haas G. Population-based survey of pain in the United States: differences among white, african american, and hispanic subjects. J Pain. 2004;5(6):317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bilbeny N, Miranda JP, Eberhard ME, Ahumada M, Méndez L, Orellana ME, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Chile – prevalence and treatment, impact on mood, daily activities and quality of life. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(3):449–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Díaz Cabezas R, Marulanda Mejía F, Sáenz X. Estudio epidemiológico del dolor crónico en Caldas, Colombia (Estudio Dolca). Acta Medica Colombiana. 2009;34:96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sansone RA, Watts DA, Wiederman MW. Pain, pain catastrophizing, and history of intentional overdoses and attempted suicide. Pain Pract. 2014;14(2):E29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Braden JB, Sullivan MD. Suicidal thoughts and behavior among adults with self-reported pain conditions in the national comorbidity survey replication. J Pain. 2008;9(12):1106–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Almeida OP, Draper B, Snowdon J, Lautenschlager NT, Pirkis J, Byrne G, et al. Factors associated with suicidal thoughts in a large community study of older adults. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(6):466–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Juurlink D, Herrmann N, Szalai J, Kopp A, Redelmeier D. Medical illness and the risk of suicide in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(11):1179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kikuchi N, Ohmori-Matsuda K, Shimazu T, Sone T, Kakizaki M, Nakaya N, et al. Pain and risk of completed suicide in Japanese men: a population-based cohort study in Japan (Ohsaki cohort study). J Pain Symptom Manag. 2009;37(3):316–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Srivastava MK, Sahoo RN, Ghotekar LH. SrihariDutta, Danabalan M, Dutta TK, das AK: risk factors associated with attempted suicide: a case control study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2004;46(1):33–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Davis LL, Kroenke K, Monahan P, Kean J, Stump TE. The SPADE symptom cluster in primary care patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(5):388–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Aktas A. Cancer symptom clusters: current concepts and controversies. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7(1):38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. van der Windt D, Croft P, Penninx B. Neck and upper limb pain: more pain is associated with psychological distress and consultation rate in primary care. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(3):564–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hooten WM. Chronic pain and mental health disorders: shared neural mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):955–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the dedicated staff members of the Hospital del Trabajador for their expert technical assistance with this research.

Funding

This research was supported by awards from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (T37-MD-001449).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Rehabilitación, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile

    Juan Carlos Vélez

  2. Multidisciplinary International Research Training (MIRT) Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Michael Kovasala & Michele Demi Collado

  3. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave Room 505F, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Lauren E. Friedman, Diana L. Juvinao-Quintero, Michelle A. Williams & Bizu Gelaye

  4. Servicio de Psiquiatría y Psicología, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile

    Lisette Araya & Jessica Castillo

  5. The Chester M. Pierce, MD Division of Global Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Bizu Gelaye

  6. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Bizu Gelaye

Authors
  1. Juan Carlos Vélez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Kovasala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michele Demi Collado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lauren E. Friedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Diana L. Juvinao-Quintero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisette Araya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jessica Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michelle A. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bizu Gelaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BG and JCV conceived and designed the study. LEF, MK, MDC and BG analyzed the data. JCV, MK, MDC, LEF, LA, JC, MAW, DJQ, and BG drafted the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data, critically revised the draft for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bizu Gelaye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The methods implemented in this study were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All analyses presented were conducted at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. All participants provided written informed consent. The institutional review boards of the Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile and the Office of Human Research Administration, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA approved all procedures used in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Additional information supporting this article can be found in the file: Appendices_SPLENDID_BMC Psychiatry.docx

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vélez, J.C., Kovasala, M., Collado, M.D. et al. Pain, mood, and suicidal behavior among injured working adults in Chile. BMC Psychiatry 22, 766 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04391-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04391-3

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us