Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of included non-randomised controlled trials

From: Deprescribing psychotropic medicines for behaviours that challenge in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review

Author/Year, Country

Study Design

Participants (n, age, gender, ethnicity, level of intellectual disabilities)

Setting

Intervention (including medication that was targeted, Duration of deprescribing intervention and length of follow up)

Outcome Measures

Summary of Findings

Aman et al. 1985 New Zealand [35]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n: 24 mean age: Not reported gender: 71% male ethnicity: not reported ID = severe / profound 100%

Inpatient

Intervention: Participants received their full antipsychotic dosage during the first week, a half dosage during the second week, and no medication thereafter for 4 weeks. The control group were not taking psychotropic medicines prior to the study

Medication: trifluoperazine, thioridazine, periciazine, haloperidol

Duration: Over one week

Length of follow up: 8 weeks after discontinuation

DISCO

The antipsychotic medication group was rated as having higher total dyskinesia scores.

However, examination of three Group by Time interactions indicated that the symptom scores rose more rapidly for the control group.

Carpenter et al. 1990 USA [36]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n: 10 mean age: 30 (18 to 53) gender: 90% male ethnicity: 70% black

30% white ID = borderline 10% mild 50% moderate 10% severe 30%

Inpatient

Intervention: Reduction of antipsychotic medication by 25–100%,; no medication changes in control group

Medication: chlorpromazine, Thioridazine, haloperidol

Duration: Not reported

Length of follow up: Not reported

Performance on a discrimination task requiring matching of colours presented sequentially on a computer screen

Group that had their medicines deprescribed achieved better scores than control group.

Gerrard et al. 2019

U.K. [37]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n: 54 (may include participants also reported in Gerrard 2020 [38]) mean age: Not reported gender: 50% male ethnicity: not reported ID = mild 16 (30%) moderate 16 (30%) severe 20 (37%) profound 2 (3%)

Community

Intervention:

The experimental group were considered for deprescribing with input from specialist PBS team, while the control group underwent unsupported medication challenge.

Medication: amisulpride 5%, aripiprazole 29%, olanzapine 5%, quetiapine 9%, risperidone 52%

Duration: Variable

Length of follow up: Variable

Number of patients who: agreed to initiation of a reduction schedule agreed to subsequent reductions had medication reviews discontinued medication Number of patients restarted on medication

Number of patients achieving 25, 50% or 75% reduction

Number of patients who had medication increased

There was a significantly higher success rate for medication reduction and discontinuation when PBS assessment and intervention was provided.

At each stage of the process, initiating a reduction schedule, there is a difference between the two groups, pointing to greater success with the support of PBS.

Complete discontinuation: 60% in PBS group 15% in non PBS group

At least 50% reduction: 20% in PBS group, 7% in non PBS group

Represcribing or dose increases: 1 person in PBS group 66% In non PBS group

Swanson et al. 1996 USA [39]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n:80 mean age: 38 gender: 61% male ethnicity: not reported

ID =

Moderate: 1%

Severe: 16%

Profound: 80%

Unknown: 3%

Inpatient

Intervention: antipsychotic dose reduced by 10% every 3 months until discontinued

Medication: risperidone

Duration: Variable

Length of follow up:6 months post

discontinuation

DISCUS

ABC

Transient increase in average DISCUS score in antipsychotic only group after withdrawal with return to baseline 6 months after discontinuation.

In group antipsychotic plus anticonvulsant no change in scores reported.

Transient increase in average ABC during antipsychotic withdrawal in those also prescribed anticonvulsants.

Wigal et al. 1993 USA [40]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n: 56 (may include participants also reported in Wigal et al., 1994 [41]) mean age: 33 gender: 64% male ethnicity: not reported ID = severe/profound 96%

Inpatient

Intervention: Medication review and dose reduction programme Four groups compared increase in antipsychotic dose (IN; n = 5), no change in antipsychotic dose (NC; n = 14), reduction in antipsychotic dose of < 25% (SD; n = 21), and reduction in antipsychotic dose of ≥25% (25D, n = 16)

Medication: antipsychotic

Duration: Variable

Length of follow up:10 months

DISCUS

Proportion of participants with dyskinesia

Number of participants discontinuing and decreasing dosage

No difference in DISCUS score between groups at baseline;

DISCUS score at follow-up was increased in NC, SD, and 25D groups—greatest increase observed in 25D group;

DISCUS score at follow- up decreased in the IN group; significant correlation observed between degree of dose reduction and DISCUS score (r = 0·51; p < 0·001); proportion with dyskinesia increased from 30% at baseline to 60% at follow-up in the 25D group, did not change in the SD or NC groups, and fell from 60 to 20% in the IN group.

Wigal et al. 1994 USA [41]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n:43 (may include participants also reported in Wigal et al., 1993 [40]) mean age: 24 gender:67% male ethnicity: not reported

ID = Severe/

Profound: 86%

Inpatient

Intervention: Medication review and dose reduction programme

Medication: antipsychotics

Duration: Variable

Length of follow up:10 months

Rates of dyskinesia

63% of discontinuation group and 29% of dose reduction group developed dyskinesia.

No dyskinesia reported in participants in no change, increase or unmedicated group.

Zuddas et al. 2000 Italy [42]

Prospective non randomised controlled design

n:10 mean age: 12.3 (7 to 17) gender: 70% male ethnicity: not reported ID = mild 2 Moderate 5

Severe 3

Community

Intervention: Following open label treatment with risperidone, three patients discontinued

Medication: risperidone

Duration: Medication tapered over 3 to 4 weeks

Length of follow up: 5 months

CARS

CPRS

CGI

C-GAS

Kiddie SAD-PL

Intellectual functioning was measured using the Raven progressive matrices.

Physical and neurological examinations, vital signs and measurement of body weight were carried out for all patients at baseline, weekly for the first month and monthly thereafter.

3 participants discontinued risperidone, 6 months after withdrawal, atypical antipsychotic was represcribed. (risperidone ×  2, olanzapine ×  1)

Patients who discontinued risperidone showed progressive behaviour deterioration.

  1. Key: AIMS Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, ABC Aberrant Behavior Checklist, ABS Agitated Behaviour Scale, BARNES Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, BFCRS Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale, BP Blood Pressure, CARS Childhood Autism Rating Scale, CGAS Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), CGI Clinical Global Impressions, CSM Committee on Safety of Medicines, CPRS Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale, DAS Disability Assessment Schedule, DISCUS Dyskinesia Identification System Condensed User Scale, DISCO Dyskinesia Identification System-Coldwater, ECG Electrocardiogram, FBC Full Blood Count, HbA1c Glycated Haemoglobin, Kiddie SAD-PL Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Present and Lifetyime Version LFTs: Liver Function Tests, MOAS Modified Overt Aggression Scale, NOSIE Nurses’ Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation, PAS-ADD Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability, PBS Positive Behaviour Support, PTH Parathyroid Hormone, RAND-36 measure of health related quality of life, U + Es Urea and elelctrolytes, UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, SCOPA-AUT Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease - Autonomic Dysfunction