Skip to main content
Download PDF

Associations of crying, sleeping, and feeding problems in early childhood and perceived social support with emotional disorders in adulthood

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 394 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multiple or persistent crying, sleeping, or feeding problems in early childhood (regulatory problems) are associated with increased internalizing symptoms in adulthood. Unknown is whether early regulatory problems are associated with emotional disorders in adulthood, and what psychosocial factors may provide protection. We tested whether early childhood multiple or persistent regulatory problems are associated with a higher risk of (a) any mood and anxiety disorder in adulthood; (b) perceiving no social support in adulthood; and (c) whether social support provides protection from mood and anxiety disorders among participants who had multiple/persistent regulatory problems and those who never had regulatory problems.

Methods

Data from two prospective longitudinal studies in Germany (n = 297) and Finland (n = 342) was included (N = 639). Regulatory problems were assessed at 5, 20, and 56 months with the same standardized parental interviews and neurological examinations. In adulthood (24–30 years), emotional disorders were assessed with diagnostic interviews and social support with questionnaires.

Results

Children with multiple/persistent regulatory problems (n = 132) had a higher risk of any mood disorder (odds ratio (OR) = 1.81 [95% confidence interval = 1.01–3.23]) and of not having any social support from peers and friends (OR = 1.67 [1.07–2.58]) in adulthood than children who never had regulatory problems. Social support from peers and friends provided protection from mood disorders, but only among adults who never had regulatory problems (OR = 4.03 [2.16–7.94]; p = .039 for regulatory problems x social support interaction).

Conclusions

Children with multiple/persistent regulatory problems are at increased risk of mood disorders in young adulthood. Social support from peers and friends may, however, only provide protection from mood disorders in individuals who never had regulatory problems.

Peer Review reports

Background

The definition of infant regulatory problems (RPs) includes excessive crying beyond 3 months of age, and feeding and sleeping problems beyond 6 months of age [1]. About 20% of infants experience any of these RPs during their first year of life [2, 3], whereas 2–9% have several RPs concurrently (i.e., multiple RPs) and/or persistently across more than one assessment point during infancy and toddlerhood [1, 2, 4, 5]. Most early RPs are transient, however, the more severe combinations of multiple or persistent RPs have been associated with increased risk for long-term behaviour and mental health problems in childhood [2, 3, 6,7,8,9,10], adolescence [5], and adulthood [2, 11,12,13].

There is some evidence from prospective longitudinal studies of associations between early RPs and specific emotional problems, but diagnostic studies of clinical disorders are rare. For instance, it has been found that excessive infant crying is associated with an increased risk for mood problems at age 5–6 years, but not with general anxiety symptoms [14]. Parental report of severe sleeping difficulties at age 5 years has been associated with an increased risk of depression at 34 years [15], and multiple/persistent early RPs have been associated with internalizing problems and depressive symptoms in adulthood [11, 13].

Emotional disorders include both mood and anxiety disorders. While anxiety disorders may often have their age of onset in childhood, mood disorders typically have a later onset with prevalence rising rapidly from early adolescence into young adulthood [16, 17]. In the general population, the lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders between 18 and 29 years has been estimated at 21.4% and 30.2% [18], whereas the point prevalence in young adulthood averages at 10.5% and 12.3%, respectively [19]. However, we do not know whether children with multiple/persistent early RPs compared with children without early RPs are at an increased risk of any mood or any anxiety disorder in adulthood. This knowledge will be helpful for screening and health services planning.

In addition, it is critically important to identify variables that can protect young adults from emotional disorders. One factor which may influence the association between multiple/persistent RPs and the risk for emotional disorders in adulthood is social support. Humans are ultra-social creatures [20] and supportive social relationships are essential for our long-term health and quality of life [21]. For instance, previous studies have documented that social support from romantic partners can provide protection against the development of psychiatric problems [22, 23], and specifically of mood and anxiety disorders [24]. Likewise, social support from peers and friends is of critical importance for individuals struggling with emotional problems, possibly especially those with early RPs in childhood. However, given the documented tendency of individuals with early RPs for an avoidant personality profile [12] as well as possible difficulties with regulating their own emotions and behaviour, we hypothesize that their social relationships with peers, friends, and romantic partners may be negatively affected. According to our knowledge, this has never been investigated. Moreover, it is unknown whether potentially protective effects of social support from peers, friends, and romantic partners on emotional disorders are different among adults who had multiple/persistent RPs in contrast to those without any RPs.

In the current study, we use data from a bi-national cohort of two large prospective longitudinal samples in two countries (Germany and Finland) that assessed early RPs with identical measures and have harmonized clinical diagnosis data on mood and anxiety disorders as well as social support in adulthood. The aim is to test whether (a) multiple RPs at age 5 months and/or persistent RPs over three time points (at least one problem at ages 5, 20, and 56 months) are associated with a higher risk for any mood or any anxiety disorder in young adulthood, (b) multiple/persistent RPs are associated with a higher risk of perceiving no social support from peers, friends, and romantic partners, and (c) whether social support similarly provides protection from mood and anxiety disorders in individuals who had multiple/persistent RPs and those who never had any RPs. We formulated three hypotheses:

  1. 1.

    Children with multiple/persistent RPs compared with children who never had RPs have a higher risk for any mood and any anxiety disorders in adulthood.

  2. 2.

    Children with multiple/persistent RPs compared with children who never had RPs are at increased risk for perceiving no social support from peers, friends, and romantic partners in adulthood.

  3. 3.

    Social support provides protection from mood and anxiety disorders in individuals with early RPs and in individuals who never had RPs.

Methods

Data were collected as part of the prospective Bavarian-Finnish Longitudinal Study (BFLS) [25], a geographically defined birth cohort of neonatal at-risk children born in Southern Bavaria, Germany (Bavarian Longitudinal Study, N = 7,505) and in the county of Uusimaa, Finland (Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study, N = 1,535) in 1985/86. In addition, 916 and 658 healthy infants born at term in the same hospitals were recruited as controls in Germany and Finland, respectively. Parents were approached within 48 h of the infant’s hospital admission and gave written informed consent to participate. Ethical approval for the studies was granted by the ethics committees of the University of Munich Children’s Hospital, the Bavarian Health Council (Landesärztekammer Bayern), the University Hospital Bonn, the Helsinki City Maternity Hospital, the Helsinki University Central Hospital, the Jorvi Hospital, and the Coordinating Ethics Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District. All adult participants gave fully informed written consent.

Bavarian Longitudinal Study (BLS). After the first phase of the study (birth to 56 months) the decision was made to reduce the sample size to N = 1,495 to allow for more intensive psychological and neurological assessments while preserving sufficient statistical power. Sampling criteria and dropout rates are provided elsewhere [26]. For this prospective case-control follow-up study in adulthood, we excluded (a) those participants who at any time between 5 and 56 months of age had a single or non-persistent RP (see Measures section for details), and (b) all cases with any missing data on crying, sleeping, or feeding problems between 5 and 56 months of age (N = 787, see Fig. 1). Of the remaining eligible 708 participants (N = 138 with multiple and/or persistent RPs and N = 570 without any RPs), we stratified and assessed N = 71 with multiple and/or persistent RPs and N = 226 without RPs with clinical psychiatric interviews in adulthood.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sample flow diagram of the Bavarian-Finnish Longitudinal Study (BFLS) participants (total adult N = 639)

Full size image

Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study (AYLS). Of the initial sample (N = 2,193), 2,086 participants were identified as alive and living in Finland in adulthood. For this prospective case-control study, 705 eligible participants were identified with complete data on multiple and/or persistent RPs (N = 167 with multiple and/or persistent RPs and N = 538 without any RPs) (Fig. 1). Of those, N = 61 participants with multiple and/or persistent RPs and N = 281 without RPs had complete clinical psychiatric interview data in adulthood.

As described above, all participants were assessed multiple times in childhood. For the design of the adult follow-up, we adopted a 2:1 sample design, with two control participants who never had any early childhood RPs per one adult participant who had had multiple and/or persistent RPs. The target sample size was determined by a-priori power analyses. In both cohorts, to ensure that the control participants were comparable to the group with multiple/persistent RPs, controls were selected and stratified according to sex, socioeconomic status (SES), and gestational age. Descriptive participant characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the multiple/persistent RPs and never RP control participants (N = 639)
Full size table

Measures

Multiple and/or persistent RPs from 5 to 56 months. At 5 months of age, paediatricians asked parents about their infant’s crying, feeding, and sleeping problems via a standardized interview as part of a neurodevelopmental assessment. At 20 and 56 months, sleeping and eating problems were assessed via standardized parental interviews and neurological examinations of oral motor function. All assessments were conducted by paediatricians trained to achieve an inter-rater reliability > 90% and receiving three-monthly booster workshops. The assessments at 5 and 20 months were corrected for prematurity, the assessment at 56 months was carried out according to chronological age. The definitions for crying, feeding, and sleeping problems at 5 months and sleeping and eating problems at 20 and 56 months have been described previously [9]. Children diagnosed with multiple RPs had two or three RPs at 5 months (BLS: 13%, AYLS: 12%). Persistent RPs were defined as having at least one RP at 5, 20, and at 56 months of age (BLS: 14%, AYLS: 9%). Subsequently, multiple and/or persistent RPs were combined into one binary variable: 0 = never RPs, 1 = multiple/persistent RPs.

Diagnosis of anxiety and mood disorders at 26 years. Clinical Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interviews (M-CIDI [27, 28]) were conducted at 24–30 years. Assessors were qualified experienced psychologists (BLS) and expert-supervised master’s-level psychology students (AYLS), trained in the interview administration and blind to group membership [24, 29]. Anxiety and mood disorder diagnoses during a 12 month period were obtained according to DSM-IV criteria. Definitions of any anxiety or mood disorders included all DSM-IV defined subtype diagnoses. The M-CIDI has good concordance with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) [30].

Social support. Information on non-biological social relationships (i.e., peers, friends, romantic partners) was obtained using questions from a standardized Life Course Interview and the Young Adult Self-Report [31] (administered in the BLS) or Adult Self Report [32] (administered in the AYLS), respectively. We extracted and harmonized critical items from these assessments that covered (a) social support from peers and friends, and (b) social support from romantic partners (Table S1) [24, 33]. These were summed and due to skewed item distribution recoded into two binary index scores for main analyses (0 = at least some support, 1 = no support). The two scores correlated with Spearman’s rho = 0.15, p < .001.

Confounding variables. Gestational age at birth was determined from maternal reports of the last menstrual period and serial ultrasounds during pregnancy. Information on family socioeconomic status (SES) at birth was obtained by standardized parental interviews within the first 10 days of life, including the occupation of the self-identified head of each family together with the highest educational qualification held by either parent. Composite indices were then coded into a binary score (1 = low, 0 = medium/high SES). We also included biological sex, age at assessment in adulthood, and cohort membership (BLS vs. AYLS) as confounding variables.

Statistical analyses. Data were analysed with SPSS 27. RP group comparisons of any anxiety and any mood disorder were carried out with binary logistic regressions. Interaction terms of RPs x social support in logistic regressions of any mood and any anxiety disorder tested if social support provided protection from these disorders similarly or differently in individuals with multiple/persistent and those who never had RPs. Analyses were adjusted for gestational age, biological sex, family SES, age at assessment in adulthood, and cohort membership (BLS vs. AYLS).

Results

Table 1 shows that there were no significant differences between children with multiple/persistent RPs and those who never had RPs with regards to sex, gestational age, and family SES at birth. However, children who had multiple/persistent RPs were older at the time of the adulthood follow-up assessment compared to those who never had RPs (Table 1).

Table 2 Prevalence of DSM-IV emotional disorder diagnoses (%) comparing participants with multiple/persistent RPs and controls (N = 639)
Full size table

Children with multiple/persistent RPs had significantly higher unadjusted rates and adjusted odds ratios of any mood disorder in adulthood than children who never had RPs (Table 2). The association with any anxiety disorders in adulthood was not significant (Table 2). These findings partially confirmed hypothesis 1.

Children with multiple/persistent RPs reported significantly higher unadjusted rates of no perceived social support from peers and friends and from romantic partners in adulthood than those who never had RPs (Table 1). When adjusted for confounders, the association with no perceived social support from peers and friends remained significant (odds ratio (OR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI)=[1.07 to 2.58]) but was rendered non-significant regarding perceived support from romantic partners (OR = 1.56 [0.99 to 2.43]). These findings partially confirmed hypothesis 2.

To answer hypothesis 3, we first ran two logistic regression models with any mood and any anxiety disorder in adulthood as the two outcomes in a combined group of children with multiple/persistent and without any RPs, including both indices of social support from peers and friends and from romantic partners simultaneously. Adults who perceived having no social support from peers and friends compared with those who reported to have such support had higher adjusted ORs of any mood (OR = 2.68 [1.56 to 4.58]) and any anxiety disorder (OR = 2.37 [1.47 to 3.82]). In these models perceived social support from romantic partners was not significantly associated with any mood (OR = 1.51 [0.89 to 2.56]) or any anxiety disorder (OR = 1.16 [0.74 to 1.83]) and was therefore dropped from the subsequent models. We then examined whether the protective association of social support from peers and friends with any mood or any anxiety disorder in adulthood differed among children with multiple/persistent RPs versus those who never had RPs. Table 3 shows that the interaction effect of multiple/persistent RPs with social support was significant on any mood disorder as the outcome (0.27 [0.08–0.94], p = .039). Figure 2 displays this interaction and shows that in children who never had RPs, those who did not perceive having social support from peers and friends in adulthood had higher unadjusted rates and adjusted ORs (4.03 [2.16–7.94]) of any mood disorder than those who perceived having at least some support. In children with multiple/persistent RPs, the unadjusted rates and adjusted ORs of any mood disorder between those who perceived having and those who perceived having no social support were not different (Fig. 2). The interaction between multiple/persistent RPs and social support on any anxiety disorder was not significant (Table 3).

Table 3 Associations between emotional disorder diagnoses, multiple/persistent early RPs and social support from peers and friends (N = 639)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Unadjusted rates (%) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals] of any mood disorder diagnoses according to multiple/persistent regulatory problems (RPs) in early childhood and perceived social support from peers and friends in adulthood (N = 639)

Full size image

Discussion

This prospective study of two parallel cohorts from Finland and Germany found that children with multiple/persistent RPs compared with children who never had RPs were at increased risk of mood disorders but not anxiety disorders in adulthood. In addition, children with multiple/persistent RPs compared with children who never had RPs were at increased risk of having no perceived social support from peers and friends in adulthood. Among children who never had RPs, those who reported to not have any social support from peers and friends were at higher risk for any mood disorder in adulthood than those who perceived to have at least some support. This protective pattern did not apply to individuals with multiple/persistent early RPs.

In accordance with the documented increased risk for life-course trajectories of dysregulation and mental health symptoms among children with early RPs [2, 5, 11], our results add that they are also at an increased risk for clinical diagnoses of mood disorders. In contrast, our nonsignificant finding of risk for anxiety disorders is somewhat reassuring, especially in light of the substantial comorbidity between mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses [34], which highlights a specific association of early multiple or persistent RPs on mood disorders. The current study is the first of this kind and one can only broadly speculate about possible underlying mechanisms and individual differences such as social experiences, personal attribution styles, neurodevelopmental functioning, HPA axis dysregulation, or epigenetic programming. Moreover, there may also be differences in genetic liability with regard to risk for RPs, and we cannot rule out associations with the genetic liability that underpins mood disorders. Future replication studies in other samples of individuals who had RPs in childhood are warranted.

Children with multiple or persistent RPs were more likely to not have social support from peers and friends in adulthood than those who never had RPs. There are several possible explanations for why early RPs may cascade into lack of support from social relationships in adults. Early RPs may disrupt socio-emotional synchrony and quality of parent-infant interaction, which provide the foundation for later social interactions with peers, friends, and romantic partners [35,36,37]. In addition, early RPs have been associated with reduced intrinsic functional connectivity of the brain’s default mode network, which is involved in a wide range of functions and particularly relevant for the interactions of the individual with their social environment [12]. The development of social behaviour is characterized by continuous bidirectional feedback loops over time [38, 39]. For instance, caregivers as the earliest interactive partners may respond in certain ways to episodes of dysregulated behaviour, and children with RPs may incorporate these responses into their own expectations of co-regulation through behavioural exchange as they grow up. There are however important differences between biological (e.g., parents) and non-biological (e.g., friends) social relationships. Peers and friends, for instance, may respond very differently to episodes of dysregulated behaviour than mothers and fathers, possibly by withdrawing from the relationship. One could speculate that repeatedly unmet expectations of behavioural exchanges and co-regulation with interactive partners may cascade into social relationship problems and perceived lack of social support later in life. Indeed, our findings suggest that children with multiple/persistent early RPs do not only perceive that they have less social support than their peers in adulthood, but also that their mood disorder risk is not affected by social support from friends and peers. According to well-established theories of risk and resilience, protective effects among the at-risk group in this study would have been somewhat expected [40]. Nevertheless, our data did not confirm it, and this is exactly why empirical testing of theories and objective interpretation of study results is critically important to our disciplines. Moreover, the finding is in direct contrast to one of the leading theories in developmental psychology, which proposes increased differential susceptibility among individuals with early difficult temperaments [41]. We have documented previously that theory-driven expectations of resilience and differential susceptibility among individuals who had early regulatory problems are not always applicable in adulthood [11]. We can only speculate why social support from friends and peers does not decrease the mood disorder risk among young adults who had multiple/persistent RPs in their early childhood, especially when considering that RPs were associated with more frequent reports of no social support. Perhaps their previous social experiences have not helped them overcome dysregulated moods, which could be in line with neurological models of learned helplessness and social defeat [42]. Perhaps the substantial normative changes adolescent brains undergo, which are associated with psychiatric disorders [43], are qualitatively different among individuals who previously had multiple/persistent RPs, which would be in line with novel pubertal recalibration models [44]. Replication studies are warranted.

Nevertheless, the finding of children who never had RPs being at lower risk for any mood disorders in adulthood if they perceived having social support from friends and peers provides practically important and novel evidence of preventative mechanisms in the general population. While social relationships may provide a resource of wellbeing more effectively for some people than for others, the vast majority of individuals very likely benefits from social support [45]. Therefore, a screening for lack of social support from friends and peers can offer very valuable pointers as to who should be screened and be eligible for interventions that can protect from mood disorders. A previous study from Germany has shown that perceived support from romantic partners may play an important role with regard to a lower risk for any mood disorders in young adulthood [24], but this finding was not replicated in the current sample from Finland and Germany. This could be due to slight cultural differences or small methodological variations, or due to the competitive modelling approach, where support from romantic partners did not independently explain significant variation in outcomes on top of the variation explained by social support from peers and friends. Future observational and intervention studies should consider assessing and evaluating both, social support from peers and friends as well as the support received from romantic partners.

The current study has several strengths. It is the first longitudinal investigation of anxiety and mood disorders in adulthood using clinical diagnoses in a bi-national cohort study including two large prospective samples of individuals who had multiple/persistent RPs in early childhood compared with a matched group of children who never had RPs. This cross-cultural design offers some generalisability of findings beyond just one country, however, it is still limited to Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations [46]. Our data includes repeated prospective assessments of RPs in infancy and toddlerhood, made via both clinical parent interviews and neurological examinations, and clinical diagnostic interviews in adulthood in both countries. We utilized gold-standard diagnostic interviews and our reported prevalence rates are in accordance with what has been reported in general population studies before. Specifically, the prevalence rates for any mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses reported here are in line with expectations based on other normal population samples from studies with similar designs including data from Europe [19]. This is of interest, as meta-analyses show that prevalence rates vary widely by world region [47]. All analyses were adjusted for a range of confounders.

There are also limitations. Maternal anxiety and mood problems have been associated with the development of infant regulatory problems [48]. However, early regulatory problems may also be precursors of maternal depression rather than the result of it [49]. Nevertheless, this question would need to be tested within a gene-environment study design, while genetic information was not included in this study and gene-environment correlations or interactions could not be investigated [50]. Other limitations include the lack of assessing other contributing factors to individuals’ risk for mood disorders in adulthood, such as experiencing bullying and victimisation, substance use, or low sensitive parenting behaviour. These factors were not investigated in conjunction with RPs as part of the current study. Moreover, RPs were not assessed via structured diaries. This was not feasible in these two prospective cohorts due to the often-reported high attrition rates in diary studies. Moreover, the samples of both cohorts included participants who were born preterm (i.e., born before 37 weeks of gestation), however, we controlled for the influence of gestational age in all analyses. Some readers may speculate about the numbers in Table 1 - these are showing distributions according to sample size based on recruitment criteria. Specifically, these do not show a higher risk among BLS children than among AYLS children to be diagnosed with multiple/persistent RPs, but merely a slightly different (non-significant) percentage of the BLS compared with AYLS adult participants who were selected for psychiatric assessment in adulthood who had multiple/persistent RPs. Irrespective of their diagnostic prevalence, mood and anxiety problems occur in the population across a symptomatic continuum rather than a categorical diagnosis. Here, our variables of any mood and anxiety diagnoses did not allow detection of subclinical symptom levels, although these may significantly affect young adults’ wellbeing and daily functioning [51]. Finally, social support was assessed in adulthood, thus causality as a protective factor for mood disorders cannot be inferred.

Conclusions

This prospective longitudinal study shows that children with multiple/persistent RPs are at higher risk of any mood disorder and of not having social support in adulthood than their peers who never had early RPs; there is no heightened risk for any anxiety disorder. Social support from peers and friends is associated with a lower risk of any mood and any anxiety disorder, but the lower risk of mood disorders is seen only among individuals who never had early RPs. Accordingly, for children with multiple/persistent RPs, perceived social support from peers and friends in adulthood does not have a protective effect against mood disorders.

Data Availability

The datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to protection of participant privacy rights but deidentified summary data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Regulatory problems:

RPs

odds ratio:

OR

confidence interval:

CI

Bavarian-Finnish Longitudinal Study:

BFLS

Bavarian Longitudinal Study:

BLS

Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study:

AYLS

socioeconomic status:

SES

Clinical Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview:

M-CIDI

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV:

SCID

References

  1. Cook F, Giallo R, Hiscock H, Mensah F, Sanchez K, Reilly S. Infant regulation and child mental health concerns: a longitudinal study. Pediatrics 2019, 143(3).

  2. Bilgin A, Baumann N, Jaekel J, Breeman L, Bartmann P, Bäuml JG, Avram M, Sorg C, Wolke D. Early crying, sleeping, and feeding problems and trajectories of attention problems from childhood to Adulthood. Child Dev. 2020;91(1):e77–e91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hemmi MH, Wolke D, Schneider S. Associations between problems with crying, sleeping and/or feeding in infancy and long-term behavioural outcomes in childhood: a meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(7):622–9628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen AL, Ammitzbøll J, Olsen EM, Skovgaard AM. Problems of feeding, sleeping and excessive crying in infancy: a general population study. Arch Dis Child 2019:archdischild–2019.

  5. Winsper C, Bilgin A, Wolke D. Associations between infant and toddler regulatory problems, childhood co-developing internalising and externalising trajectories, and adolescent depression, psychotic and borderline personality disorder symptoms. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61(2):182–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jusiene R, Breidokiene R, Pakalniskiene V. Developmental trajectories of mother reported regulatory problems from toddlerhood to preschool age. Infant Behav Dev. 2015;40:84–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Winsper C, Wolke D. Infant and toddler crying, sleeping and feeding problems and trajectories of dysregulated behavior across childhood. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;12:12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baumann N, Jaekel J, Breeman L, Bartmann P, Bäuml JG, Avram M, Sorg C, Wolke D. The association of infant crying, feeding, and sleeping problems and inhibitory control with attention regulation at school age. Infancy. 2019;0(0):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmid G, Schreier A, Meyer R, Wolke D. A prospective study on the persistence of infant crying, sleeping and feeding problems and preschool behaviour. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(2):286–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hyde R, O’Callaghan MJ, Bor W, Williams GM, Najman JM. Long-term outcomes of infant behavioral dysregulation. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):E1243–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaekel J, Sorg C, Breeman L, Baumann N, Bilgin A, Bäuml JG, Wolke D. Early regulatory problems and parenting: life-long risk, vulnerability or susceptibility for attention, internalizing and externalizing outcomes? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(10):1523–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bäuml JG, Baumann N, Avram M, Mulej Bratec S, Breeman L, Berndt M, Bilgin A, Jaekel J, Wolke D, Sorg C. The default Mode Network mediates the impact of Infant Regulatory problems on adult avoidant personality traits. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019;4(4):333–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolke D, Baumann N, Jaekel J, Pyhälä R, Heinonen K, Räikkönen K, Sorg C, Bilgin A. The association of early regulatory problems with behavioral problems and cognitive functioning in adulthood: two cohorts in two countries. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023.

  14. Smarius L, Strieder TGA, Loomans EM, Doreleijers TAH, Vrijkotte TGM, Gemke RJ, van Eijsden M. Excessive infant crying doubles the risk of mood and behavioral problems at age 5: evidence for mediation by maternal characteristics. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(3):293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene G, Gregory AM, Fone D, White J. Childhood sleeping difficulties and depression in adulthood: the 1970 british Cohort Study. J Sleep Res. 2015;24(1):19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA. Annual Research Review: a meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(3):345–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solmi M, Radua J, Olivola M, Croce E, Soardo L, Salazar de Pablo G, Il Shin J, Kirkbride JB, Jones P, Kim JH, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(1):281–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson PJ, de Miranda DM, Albuquerque MR, Indredavik MS, Evensen KAI, Van Lieshout R, Saigal S, Taylor HG, Raikkonen K, Kajantie E, et al. Psychiatric disorders in individuals born very preterm / very low-birth weight: an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;42:101216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomasello M. The ultra-social animal. Eur J social Psychol. 2014;44(3):187–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. House J, Landis K, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241(4865):540–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozbay F, Fitterling H, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress across the life span: a neurobiologic framework. Curr psychiatry Rep. 2008;10(4):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. La Greca AM, Harrison HM. Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: do they predict social anxiety and depression? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005;34(1):49–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaekel J, Baumann N, Bartmann P, Wolke D. Mood and anxiety disorders in very preterm/very low–birth weight individuals from 6 to 26 years. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59(1):88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riegel K, Ohrt B, Wolke D, Österlund K. Die Entwicklung gefährdet geborener Kinder bis zum fünften Lebensjahr: die Arvo Ylppö-Neugeborenen-Nachfolgestudie in Südbayern und Südfinnland [The development of at-risk children until the fifth year of life. The Arvo Ylppö Longitudinal Study in South Bavaria and South Finland]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag; 1995.

  26. Jaekel J, Baumann N, Wolke D. Effects of gestational age at birth on cognitive performance: a function of cognitive workload demands. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e65219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wittchen HU, Beloch E, Garczynski E, Holly A, Lachner G, Perkonigg A, Pfuetze EM, Schuster P, Vodermaier A, Vossen A, et al. Manual zum Münchener Composite Diagnostic interview. München: Max Planck Institut für Psychiatrie – Klinische Psychologie; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wittchen HU, Pfister H. DIA-X – expertensystem zur Diagnostik psychischer Störungen. Frankfurt: Swets Test Services; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heinonen K, Kajantie E, Pesonen AK, Lahti M, Pirkola S, Wolke D, Lano A, Sammallahti S, Lahti J, Andersson S, et al. Common mental disorders in young adults born late-preterm. Psychol Med. 2016;46(10):2227–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haro JM, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S, Brugha TS, De Girolamo G, Guyer ME, Jin R, Lepine JP, Mazzi F, Reneses B, Vilagut G, et al. Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):167–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Young Adult Selt-Report and Young Adult Behavior Checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wolke D, Copeland WE, Angold A, Costello EJ. Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychol Sci 2013.

  34. Saha S, Lim CCW, Cannon DL, Burton L, Bremner M, Cosgrove P, Huo Y, J JM. Co-morbidity between mood and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2021;38(3):286–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ludwig RJ, Welch MG. Wired to connect: the autonomic Socioemotional Reflex Arc. Front Psychol 2022, 13.

  36. Feldman R. The adaptive human parental brain: implications for children’s social development. Trends in Neurosciences 2015.

  37. Samdan G, Kiel N, Petermann F, Rothenfußer S, Zierul C, Reinelt T. The relationship between parental behavior and infant regulation: a systematic review. Dev Rev. 2020;57:100923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Paschall KW, Mastergeorge AM. A review of 25 years of research in bidirectionality in parent–child relationships:an examination of methodological approaches. Int J Behav Dev. 2016;40(5):442–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hunter H, Allen KB, Liu R, Jaekel J, Bell MA. Examining the bidirectional relationships between maternal intrusiveness and child internalizing symptoms in a community sample: a longitudinal study from infancy to middle childhood. Depress Anxiety. 2021;38(12):1245–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Masten AS. Ordinary magic - resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):227–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pluess M, Belsky J. Children’s differential susceptibility to effects of parenting. Family Sci. 2010;1(1):14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hammack SE, Cooper MA, Lezak KR. Overlapping neurobiology of learned helplessness and conditioned defeat: implications for PTSD and mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(2):565–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(12):947–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gunnar MR, DePasquale CE, Reid BM, Donzella B, Miller BS. Pubertal stress recalibration reverses the effects of early life stress in postinstitutionalized children. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(48):23984–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ozbay F, Johnson DC, Dimoulas E, Morgan CA, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Psychiatry. 2007;4(5):35–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nielsen M, Haun D, Kärtner J, Legare CH. The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: a call to action. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017;162:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, Chey T, Jackson JW, Patel V, Silove D. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):476–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Martini J, Petzoldt J, Knappe S, Garthus-Niegel S, Asselmann E, Wittchen HU. Infant, maternal, and familial predictors and correlates of regulatory problems in early infancy: the differential role of infant temperament and maternal anxiety and depression. Early Hum Dev. 2017;115:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Petzoldt J. Systematic review on maternal depression versus anxiety in relation to excessive infant crying: it is all about the timing. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;21(1):15–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Knafo A, Jaffee SR. Gene-environment correlation in developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Copeland WE, Wolke D, Shanahan L, Costello EJ. Adult functional outcomes of common childhood psychiatric problems: a prospective, longitudinal study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(9):892–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all current and former Bavarian Longitudinal Study and Arvo Ylppö Study group members, paediatricians, psychologists, and research nurses. Special thanks are due to the study participants and their families.

Funding

This study was supported by grants PKE24, JUG14, 01EP9504 and 01ER0801 from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF), by grant DFG SCHM 3045/2 − 1 from the German Research Foundation (DFG), and by Academy of Finland programme grants. DW is supported by a UKRI Frontier Research Grant EP/X023206/1 (ERC-AdG reviewed). JJ is supported by the Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation (Application nr. 5618).

Open Access funding support was provided by the Biodiverse Anthropocenes program (University of Oulu, Academy of Finland Profi6 336449), the VISE Research Unit, and University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital.

Open Access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Julia Jaekel

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Julia Jaekel, Nicole Baumann & Dieter Wolke

  3. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Julia Jaekel & Nicole Baumann

  4. Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Kati Heinonen, Riikka Pyhälä & Katri Räikkönen

  5. Psychology/Welfare Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Kati Heinonen

  6. Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

    Ayten Bilgin

  7. Department of Neuroradiology and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Christian Sorg

  8. Department of Psychiatry, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Christian Sorg

  9. TUM-NIC Neuroimaging Center Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Christian Sorg

  10. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Dieter Wolke

  11. Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychology Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Nicole Baumann

Authors
  1. Julia Jaekel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kati Heinonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicole Baumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayten Bilgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Riikka Pyhälä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Sorg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Katri Räikkönen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dieter Wolke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors substantially contributed to the conception of the work and/or the acquisition of the data. JJ analysed the data and drafted the first version of the manuscript including figures and tables. All authors contributed to interpreting the data and to writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Jaekel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the studies was granted by the ethics committees of the University of Munich Children’s Hospital, the Bavarian Health Council (Landesärztekammer Bayern), the University Hospital Bonn, the Helsinki City Maternity Hospital, the Helsinki University Central Hospital, the Jorvi Hospital, and the Coordinating Ethics Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all other relevant guidelines and regulations. Parents were approached within 48 h of their infant’s hospital admission and gave written informed consent to participate. Written informed consent has been taken from the parents/LAR as minors (infants) involved in the study. In adulthood, participants gave fully informed written consent for themselves.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaekel, J., Heinonen, K., Baumann, N. et al. Associations of crying, sleeping, and feeding problems in early childhood and perceived social support with emotional disorders in adulthood. BMC Psychiatry 23, 394 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04854-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04854-1

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us