Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Study on the daily dose and serum concentration of clozapine in psychiatric patients and possible influencing factors of serum concentration

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 596 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Clozapine is the most effective drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and the dosage and concentration of clozapine in the treatment of mental illness vary greatly in different populations and are affected by many factors.

Methods

The serum clozapine concentration of 3734 psychiatric patients was detected, and data on daily dose, sex, age and other medical records were collected for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean daily dose, mean serum concentration and mean C/D (concentration/dose) ratio of clozapine were 191.02 ± 113.47 mg/day, 326.15 ± 235.66 ng/mL and 1.94 ± 1.25 ng/mL per mg/day, respectively. There was difference in daily dose between sexes, and females had higher daily dose (p <0.01), higher serum clozapine concentrations (p < 0.01) and higher C/D ratios (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in daily dose (p < 0.001), serum drug concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001) among different age groups. The daily dose decreased with age (p for trend < 0.001), and the C/D ratio increased with age (p for trend < 0.001). Inpatients and outpatients had no difference in daily dose, but inpatients had higher serum concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001). There was no difference in daily dose among different occupations, but there were significant differences in serum concentration (p < 0.001) and C/D ratio (p < 0.001), and unemployed patients may have higher serum concentration and C/D ratio. Duration of disease, comorbidity, marital status, and psychotic type may influence the daily dose and serum concentration.

Conclusions

The effective daily dose and serum concentration of clozapine in the study area may be lower than recommended levels, and women have higher serum concentrations and slower metabolic rates. With increasing age, the daily dose decreases, and the metabolic rate slows. Inpatient status and occupation of patients may influence the serum concentration and metabolic rate of clozapine.

Peer Review reports

Background

Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic that mainly blocks serotonin (5-HT2A) and dopamine (DA1) receptors in the brain to treat psychosis. In addition, clozapine can directly inhibit the upwards activation system of the brain stem reticular structure and has a relatively powerful sedative and hypnotic effect. Clinically, clozapine is mainly used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia or treatment-resistant bipolar disorder; it can improve the positive symptoms of psychosis to a certain extent and have an effect on the negative symptoms [1]. Clozapine can be used for acute and chronic schizophrenia and has a certain therapeutic effect on fantasies, delusions and hallucinations. It is also useful for treating emotional symptoms such as depression, guilt, and anxiety, as well as mania and other psychiatric disorders [2]. Furthermore, clozapine is the only FDA-approved drug to prevent suicidal behaviour [3].

Major side effects of clozapine include strong sedative effects, more anticholinergic effects, common dizziness, fatigue, drowsiness, sweating, salivation, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, tachycardia, constipation and postural hypotension. Second, the more common symptoms are increased appetite and weight gain. Third, it can also cause elevated blood sugar and lipids [4]. Fourth, the serious adverse effects are agranulocytosis and secondary infection. Clozapine is currently recognized as a fairly effective drug in the treatment of schizophrenia and represents the most effective pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant psychosis [5]. In addition, clozapine was associated with a reduction in overall mortality compared with other second-generation antipsychotics [6]. Clozapine has these unique effects that are not matched by other antipsychotic drugs, such as risperidone and olanzapine [7,8,9]. Because clozapine reduces granulocytes, a serious side effect, it is not considered the first choice of antipsychotic drug at present.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) quantifies and interprets the concentration of the drug in plasma or serum and examines the correlation between the dose of the drug and the concentration of the drug in the blood for each patient to yield the highest therapeutic effect and the lowest risk of adverse drug reactions/toxicity [10]. Based on empirical evidence, clozapine is a strongly recommended drug for TDM (Level 1) [11]. To ensure the efficacy of clozapine and reduce its side effects, blood clozapine concentrations should be monitored during clozapine therapy [12]. In this study, the relationship between clozapine dosage and serum drug concentration and the factors that may affect serum drug concentration were studied from the perspective of a population in eastern China to provide a basis and reference for the clinical application of clozapine.

Methods

Samples

All samples in this study were collected from patients in Shandong Daizhuang Hospital. The included subjects were diagnosed with schizophrenia (paranoid schizophrenia, undifferentiated schizophrenia and residual schizophrenia), affective (mood) disorder (bipolar disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, manic and major depressive episode) and others (organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders, dissociation [conversion] disorder, behavioural and emotional disorders that usually begin in childhood and adolescence, mental retardation, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, specific personality disorder) by at least 2 psychiatrists according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with mental disorders diagnosed in our hospital, (2) patients with available medical records, and (3) patients taking clozapine. None of the subjects had obvious signs of clozapine poisoning or significant adverse drug reactions. The patients were instructed to take clozapine orally starting with a small dose; the initial dose was 25 mg/time, 2–3 times a day, and gradually increased to the conventional therapeutic dose according to the instructions.

In a steady state, drug intake equals drug elimination over a period of time, and the steady state valley concentration (Cmin) is usually quantitative. The Cmin of most drugs in the steady state (fixed dose treatment with at least 4–6 half-lives) has been used as a standard procedure and is recommended in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The elimination half-life of clozapine is approximately 12–16 h on average [11], and serum drug concentrations were measured after 4 to 6 metabolic half-lives of fixed doses of clozapine. Patients took the drug at approximately 9–11 pm, and blood was drawn from the patient at approximately 6–8 am the next day. According to the clinical treatment requirements, the psychiatrist gave the patient a medical order for clozapine blood concentration monitoring, and the nurse drew 5 ml of fasting venous blood with a vacuum vessel without other components and immediately sent it for examination.

Detection of serum clozapine concentration

The clozapine serum concentration was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at the Clinical Drug Concentration Monitoring Laboratory, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Daizhuang Hospital. The received blood samples were placed in a temperature box at 37 °C for several minutes to accelerate solidification and centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 min after solidification.

One millilitre of the supernatant was added to a 10-ml glass tube, and 20 µl of the internal standard solution and 100 µL NaOH (concentration of 0.1 mol/L) were added and then shaken for several seconds. Then, 5 ml n-pentane was added and shaken for 1 min. The supernatant was transferred to another 10-ml glass tube, dried in a water bath at 70 °C, removed, cooled to room temperature and re-dissolved in 100 µl of mobile phase. After shaking for a few seconds, the supernatant was centrifuged at 2000 r/min for 5 min, and 30 µl of the supernatant was taken in the intubation and sent to the machine for analysis.

HPLC chromatographic conditions were as follows: mobile phase (methanol: water: tetramethylethylenediamine: acetic acid = 677:330:2.2:1.76), flow rate: 0.8 mL/min, column: SB-C18, detection wavelength: 254 nm, column temperature: 40℃, injection volume: 20 µl, injection time: 12 min. Internal standard solution: 2-amino-5-chloro-2-fluorophenone (5 µg/mL).

C/D ratio and medical record information

The results of clozapine serum concentration were looked up in the Laboratory Information System (LIS). The daily dose of clozapine for psychiatric patients was obtained by consulting the doctor’s orders in the medical records. The serum concentration/daily dose ratio (C/D ratio) was obtained by calculating the ratio of serum clozapine concentration (ng/mL) to daily dose (mg/day), which represented the metabolism and clearance rate of clozapine in vivo [13]. C/D ratios are inversely related to total clearance; the lower the C/D ratio is, the faster the clearance rate of clozapine in vivo; in contrast, the higher the C/D ratio is, the smaller the clearance rate of clozapine in vivo [14].

No names were collected in the case inquiry or medical advice in order to protect patient privacy, and the medical record number was used as the inquiry identifier. The medical records of each subject were collected and analysed, including gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, mental illness type, residence, medication amount, etc.

Statistical analysis

Data with a normal distribution will be described by the mean ± SD, and data with a non-normal distribution will be described by the median (interquartile range). Spearman correlation was used for correlation analysis; the Mann‒Whitney test and Kruskal‒Wallis test were used to compare the data between groups. In addition, univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses and trend tests were also used to analyse the data. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analysis was computed using SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 3734 subjects were included in this study. All medical records were available and ranged in age from 10 to 75 years old, with an average age of 38.18 ± 11.75 years old. A total of 2424 male patients and 1310 female patients were included. The duration of the diseases ranged from 1 to 600 months, with an average of 195.63 ± 118.56 months. In this study, the psychiatric disorders treated with clozapine were mainly schizophrenia (75.92%) and mood disorder (22.25%). Other psychiatric disorders treated with clozapine, including “organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders” and “behavioural and emotional disorders that usually begin in childhood and adolescence”, accounted for 1.83% of the included subjects. Paranoid schizophrenia, undifferentiated schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder were the most commonly treated disorders with clozapine (Table 1).

Table 1 Types of psychiatric disorders treated with clozapine (n = 3734)
Full size table

Results of daily dose, serum concentration and C/D ratio

Clozapine was prescribed once daily to three times daily by the psychiatrist, depending on the patient’s condition. The daily doses ranged from 12.5 mg/day to 825 mg/day, and the average daily dose was 191.02 ± 113.47 mg/day. The serum concentrations of clozapine ranged from 27.44 ng/mL to 1884.23 ng/mL, with an average of 326.15 ± 235.66 ng/mL. The C/D ratio ranged from 0.18 to 12.84, with an average of 1.94 ± 1.25. The Spearman correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between daily dose and serum concentration (r = 0.594, p < 0.01) (Table 2).

Table 2 Clozapine dose, serum concentration and the C/D ratio
Full size table

Taking the clozapine daily dose as the independent variable and the serum drug concentration as the dependent variable, regression analysis showed that the regression coefficient was b = 1.067 (R = 0.513, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relationship between the daily dose of clozapine and serum concentration. The linear regression equation of clozapine daily dose and concentration was Y = 122.793 + 1.065*x, R = 0.513, p < 0.001

Full size image

The subjects were divided into four groups according to the daily dose: <100 mg/day group, 100–200 mg/day group, 201–400 mg/day group and > 400 mg/day group. The daily dose of clozapine in psychiatric patients between 100 and 400 mg/day accounted for 77.93% of the subjects, and the daily doses of 50–350 mg/d accounted for 87.50%. Through trend test analysis, the clozapine serum concentration showed an increasing trend with increasing drug dose (p < 0.001), and the C/D ratio showed a decreasing trend with increasing daily drug dose (p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Trend test of different dose groups and different serum concentration groups
Full size table

The subjects were divided into three groups according to the serum concentration: <350 ng/mL, 350–600 ng/mL and > 600 ng/mL. The serum clozapine concentration in most patients was < 350 ng/mL, accounting for 62.77%. Only 28.07% of the patients had clozapine concentrations between 350 and 600 ng/mL. A total of 9.16% of patients had clozapine concentrations > 600 ng/mL, among which 62 patients (1.66%) had clozapine concentrations > 1000 ng/mL and 1 patient had clozapine concentrations > 1800 ng/mL. The concentration range of 50–600 ng/mL accounted for 86.20% of the population in this study. Through trend test analysis, the C/D ratio showed an increasing trend with increasing serum drug concentration (p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Comparison of clozapine daily dose, serum concentration and C/D ratios among different groups

Subjects were grouped according to different attributes. According to age, the psychiatric patients were divided into four groups: the 10-17-year-old group, 18-44-year-old group, 45-59-year-old group and 60-75-year-old group. More than half of the subjects were in the 18–44 age range. According to the duration of the disease, the patients were divided into two groups: the < 180 months group and the ≥ 180 months group. According to marital status, the patients were divided into three groups: single, married and divorced. According to occupation, the patients were divided into four groups: unemployed, farmers, workers and others. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the diseases were associated with somatic diseases: the psychiatric disorder group and the psychiatric disorder combined with somatic disease (comorbidities) group. Additional background information is presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Baseline characteristics of the included patients (N = 3734)
Full size table

Through statistical analysis, there was significant difference in the daily dose of clozapine between males and females (p < 0.01), there was a significant difference in the serum concentration of clozapine between males and females, and the serum concentration in females was higher (p < 0.01). There was also a statistically significant difference in the C/D ratio between males and females, and the C/D ratio in females was higher (p < 0.01).

There were significant differences in the daily dose of clozapine in different age groups, and the daily dose in the 10–17 age group was the highest (p < 0.01). Correspondingly, there were significant differences in serum concentrations among different age groups. There were significant differences in the C/D ratio among different age groups, and the C/D ratio in the 10–17 age group was the lowest (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in the daily dose, serum concentration and C/D ratio between the two groups with different disease durations. Compared with the > 180-month duration group, the daily dose in the ≤ 180-month duration group was higher (p < 0.01), and the serum concentration and C/D ratio in the < 180-month duration group were lower (p < 0.01).

Psychiatric disorders treated with clozapine were mainly schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with few other diseases. There were significant differences in daily dose, serum concentration and C/D ratio among schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other types of mental diseases. The schizophrenia group had the highest daily dose (p < 0.01) and serum concentration (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in daily dose between outpatients and inpatients, but there was a significant difference in serum concentration (p < 0.01) and C/D ratio (p < 0.01). The serum concentration and C/D ratio in inpatients were higher.

There were significant differences in the daily dose serum concentration and C/D ratio between the psychiatric disorder group and the comorbidity group. The daily dose in the psychiatric disorder group was higher than that in the comorbidities group (p < 0.01), and the serum concentration and C/D ratio in the psychiatric disorder group were lower than those in the comorbidities group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). There were significant differences among different occupations in serum concentration (p < 0.01) and C/D ratio (p < 0.01), and the C/D ratio in the unemployed group was the highest (Table 5).

Table 5 Comparison of clozapine dose, serum concentration and C/D ratio among different variable groups
Full size table

Trend tests of dose, concentration, and C/D ratio between age groups

The statistical results of this study showed that there were significant differences in the daily dose, serum concentration and C/D ratio among different age groups of psychiatric patients. According to trend analysis results, the daily dose of clozapine in psychiatric patients decreased with age (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a). Serum concentration in the four age groups did not show an increasing trend with age (Fig. 2b1), but when the subjects were divided into 10–44 and 45–75 age groups according to their ages, there was a significant difference in serum drug concentration between the 10–44 and 45–75 age groups (p < 0.01), and the serum concentration in the 10–44 age group was lower (Fig. 2b2). The C/D ratio increased with age (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Relationship between daily dose of clozapine and age groups. With increasing age, the daily dose of clozapine tended to decrease. b1 Relationship between clozapine serum concentrations and age groups. Although there were significant differences in the serum concentrations of clozapine among age groups, there was no significant trend in the daily dose of clozapine with age. b2 Relationship between clozapine serum concentration and age groups.When the subjects were divided into two age groups, 10-44 years old and 45-75 years old, the serum concentration of clozapine was significantly different between the two groups (P <0.01), and the serum concentration of clozapine in the 45-75 years old group was higher than that in the 10-44 years old group. c Relationship between the C/D ratio and age group. With increasing age, the C/D ratio tended to increase.

With increasing age, the daily dose of clozapine tended to decrease

Full size image

Regression model and identifying factors

We used a regression model to further examine the factors that influenced serum clozapine concentration. After univariate and multivariate regression analyses revealed that daily dose, sex, age, inpatients/outpatients, and occupation (worker) were significant factors (p = 0.000). The duration of the disease and the type of mental illness were significant factors in the univariate regression model (p < 0.05) but were not significant in the multivariate regression model (p > 0.05). Thus, daily dose, sex, age and occupation are factors that predict serum clozapine concentration (Table 6).

Table 6 Predictors associated with clozapine serum concentration in the linear regression model
Full size table

Discussion

Application prospects and therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine

With the increasing awareness of the need for personalized treatment, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which combines quantitative blood drug concentrations, pharmacological interpretation, and therapeutic guidance, has been introduced into drug therapy as a precision medicine tool [15]. TDM allows for individualized pharmacokinetic therapy by taking into account individual differences in pharmacokinetics [11]. It has become routine practice to quantify the plasma concentration of a large number of neuro psychotropic drugs, especially first-generation and second-generation antipsychotics and mood stabilizers [16]. At the same daily dose, as patients differ in their ability to absorb, distribute, metabolize and excrete drugs due to concurrent disease, age, concomitant medication or genetic abnormalities, the homeostasis concentration of a drug in vivo can vary more than 20-fold between individuals [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. This study found a correlation of 0.594 between the daily dose and serum concentration of clozapine, which was a moderate correlation level (0.5≤|r|<0.8), and this result is similar to the published study [24], in which r = 0.49 (p < 0.001). This reflects that the metabolism of clozapine varies greatly among individuals. Therefore, in the clinical application of clozapine, individualized medication and drug concentration monitoring become necessary and more meaningful.

Discussion of clozapine dose, concentration, and C/D values

Clozapine is mainly used for the treatment of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder [25]; in addition, clozapine has also been used in the off-label treatment of bipolar disorder [3, 26], major depressive disorder (MDD) [27], and Parkinson’s disease (PD)[25, 28, 29]. The indications for clozapine in the drug label approved by China include that it may be effective for some patients who have failed or are not effective with traditional antipsychotics. It is also used for the treatment of agitation and hallucinatory delusions of mania or other psychotic disorders. The unique pharmacological properties and curative effects of clozapine make it gradually applied by psychiatrists beyond the drug label. In the study, clozapine was used by 75.92% of patients with schizophrenia, 22.25% of patients with affective (mood) disorders, and 1.83% of patients with other mental disorders. This indicates that clozapine is used in off-label treatment in the study area and suggests that clozapine has greater potential application value. Due to the side effects of clozapine, clozapine remains an underprescribed medication [28], and caution should be taken when using clozapine for off-label treatment.

Following the instructions for clozapine (Shandong Renhetang Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd), the treatment dose of clozapine was 201–400 mg/day, and the maintenance dose was 100–200 mg/day. The average dose of clozapine in the study population was 191.02 ± 113.47 mg/day, and doses of 50–350 mg/d accounted for 87.50% of the population, which means that 50–350 mg/day may be the effective therapeutic dose for the population in the study region. This result is different from the recommended dose of 300–600 mg/day but is similar to the study conclusion of Jose et al. Jose’s study showed that the average clozapine dose in Asian countries was less than 300 mg/day [30]. More research is needed to determine whether there are regional or ethnic differences in the therapeutic dose of clozapine.

The average serum concentration of clozapine in this study was 326.15 ± 235.66 ng/mL, lower than the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) recommended effective and safe concentration of 350–600 ng/mL [31, 32]. The population within the concentration range of 350–600 ng/mL only accounted for 28.07% of the population in this study, while the population with < 350 ng/mL concentration accounted for 62.77%. The serum concentration range of 50–600 ng/mL accounted for 86.20% of the subjects in this study; therefore, the treatment concentration of clozapine recommended in this study area may be more appropriate at 50–600 ng/mL. The therapeutic reference scope of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is still controversial [33], and some existing studies suggest keeping clozapine levels above 350 ng/mL before considering dosing [34], which may not be appropriate for all populations.

There were significant individual differences in the C/D ratio, which are affected by genetic, personal, and environmental factors [35, 36]. The C/D ratio indicates the clearance rate of drugs [37]; the smaller the C/D ratio is, the faster the drug clearance/metabolism is. In this study, the psychiatric patients were grouped according to the daily dose, the serum drug concentration increased and the C/D ratio decreased as the daily dose increased. The larger the daily dose was, the smaller the C/D ratio, indicating that the larger the dose was, the faster the clearance. Therefore, it is more important to carry out drug concentration monitoring in people taking large doses than in people taking small doses to ensure effective doses. In this study, the average C/D ratio was 1.94 ± 1.25, which was higher than the 1.57 in the Asian population and 1.07 in Caucasians in the study results of Jose et al. [30]. The results indicate that the metabolic rate of clozapine in the population of the study area might be slower and that a lower daily dose may be required to achieve an effective serum concentration. In this study, both the serum concentration and C/D ratio of females were higher than those of males, which was similar to the results of scholars such as Castberg [38], Michaelaet [39] and Jönsson [40] and consistent with the drug instructions. Similarly, the metabolic rate of clozapine was higher in males than in females.

Discussion of influencing factors

In this study, the results showed that the older the age, the lower the required clozapine dose and the slower the metabolism, which suggests that serum drug concentration needs to be monitored among older individuals to prevent drug-related side effects caused by high serum concentration. The 10–17 year age group had the highest clozapine dose, the smallest C/D value and the smallest serum concentration. This may be because the metabolic rate of clozapine was faster in the 10–17 year age group, so a slightly higher dose was required to reach the serum effective therapeutic concentration. Our follow-up study focused on the association between different ages and the concentration of effective psychiatric medications.

Compared to outpatients, inpatients have similar daily doses, higher serum concentrations and slower metabolism rates. This may mean that there should be different standards for serum concentrations in inpatients and outpatients.

The daily dose of clozapine did not differ among patients with different occupations, but unemployed patients had higher serum concentrations and slower metabolic rates. This may be because unemployed patients have less physical labor than employed patients, and physical activity increases blood circulation and drug metabolism, so unemployed people have the highest C/D ratio or lower metabolic rate. This suggests that occupation may be one of the factors that predict serum clozapine concentration, and psychiatrists should consider occupation factors when prescribing dosage of clozapine. Further studies are needed to explain the association between occupation and clozapine metabolism.

Therefore, the monitoring of serum concentration should be strengthened in unemployed patients. Compared with psychiatric patients, patients with comorbidities have a smaller dose and slower metabolism; therefore, concentration monitoring in patients with comorbidities should be strengthened.

Limitations of this study

The major enzymes and efflux transporters involved in the metabolism and distribution of clozapine include CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and P-gp (ABCB1) [21, 41,42,43]. Some drugs, such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and rifampicin, can induce CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, P-gp (ABCB1) and other enzymes or ABC transporters [44,45,46]. The combination of these drugs with clozapine may accelerate the metabolism and distribution of clozapine. Such drugs were not included in this study and should be included in subsequent studies. Some drugs, such as fluvoxamine, enoxacin and phenylpropanolamine, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, omeprazole, macrolobemide, and voriconazol, can inhibit the activity of the CYP1A2 enzyme and CYP2C19 enzyme [47,48,49,50,51]. These drugs can inhibit the metabolism of clozapine and increase the blood concentration of clozapine. These drugs were not included in this study, and the interaction between these drugs and clozapine could not be analyzed, and subsequent studies should be optimized. Future studies should include drug interactions and clozapine-related metabolic genes.

The results of a previous study suggest that smoking is inversely associated with clozapine blood levels or decreases clozapine blood levels [39]. One mechanism that has been reported is that smoking can induce the CYP1A2 enzyme and accelerate the metabolism of clozapine [52]. Therefore, smoking patients should increase the dose of clozapine appropriately according to clinical needs and conduct blood concentration monitoring. Future clozapine-related studies should assess smoking.

Conclusions

In summary, the metabolism of clozapine in psychiatric patients is affected by a variety of factors and varies greatly among individuals. It is important to monitor the drug concentration when taking clozapine to determine the optimal therapeutic concentration range to guide treatment and achieve accurate treatment [17].

Availability of data and materials

Data and material are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

C/D:

concentration/ dose

TDM:

Therapeutic drug monitoring

Cmin:

steady state valley concentration

HPLC:

high-performance liquid chromatography

MDD:

major depressive disorder

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

References

  1. Fitton A, Heel RC. Clozapine. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic use in schizophrenia. Drugs. 1990;40(5):722–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khokhar JY, Henricks AM, Sullivan EDK, Green AI. Unique Effects of Clozapine: a pharmacological perspective. Adv Pharmacol (San Diego Calif). 2018;82:137–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapczinski F, Pfaffenseller B, Dursun SM, de Azevedo Cardoso T. Clozapine for bipolar disorder: what do we know thus far and what next? Bipolar Disord. 2021;23(2):115–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan MSA, Honarparvar F, Falconer JR, Parekh HS, Pandey P, Siskind DJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between clozapine and norclozapine serum levels and peripheral adverse drug reactions. Psychopharmacology. 2021;238(3):615–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuen JWY, Kim DD, Procyshyn RM, Panenka WJ, Honer WG, Barr AM. A focused review of the metabolic side-effects of clozapine. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:609240.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vermeulen JM, van Rooijen G, van de Kerkhof MPJ, Sutterland AL, Correll CU, de Haan L. Clozapine and long-term mortality risk in patients with Schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies lasting 1.1–12.5 years. Schizophr Bull. 2019;45(2):315–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nucifora FC Jr, Mihaljevic M, Lee BJ, Sawa A. Clozapine as a model for Antipsychotic Development. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(3):750–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang X, Simpson GM. Clozapine: more side effects but still the best antipsychotic. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(8):982–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Honer WG, Jones AA, Thornton AE, Barr AM, Procyshyn RM, Vila-Rodriguez F. Response trajectories to clozapine in a secondary analysis of pivotal trials support using treatment response to subtype schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(3 Suppl 2):19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akerblad AC, Bengtsson F, Ekselius L, von Knorring L. Effects of an educational compliance enhancement programme and therapeutic drug monitoring on treatment adherence in depressed patients managed by general practitioners. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;18(6):347–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiemke C, Bergemann N, Clement HW, Conca A, Deckert J, Domschke K, Eckermann G, Egberts K, Gerlach M, Greiner C, et al. Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2018;51(1–02):e1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Remington G, Lee J, Agid O, Takeuchi H, Foussias G, Hahn M, Fervaha G, Burton L, Powell V. Clozapine’s critical role in treatment resistant schizophrenia: ensuring both safety and use. Exp Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(9):1193–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Leon J, Spina E, Diaz FJ. Clobazam therapeutic drug monitoring: a comprehensive review of the literature with proposals to improve future studies. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35(1):30–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz FJ, Santoro V, Spina E, Cogollo M, Rivera TE, Botts S, de Leon J. Estimating the size of the effects of comedications on plasma clozapine concentrations using a model that controls for clozapine doses and confounding variables. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008;41(3):81–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoretsanitis G, Paulzen M, Unterecker S, Schwarz M, Conca A, Zernig G, Gründer G, Haen E, Baumann P, Bergemann N, et al. TDM in psychiatry and neurology: a comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology, update 2017; a tool for clinicians. World J Biol psychiatry. 2018;19(3):162–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Preskorn SH. Practical application of therapeutic drug monitoring: a tale of two patients. J Psychiatr Pract. 2008;14(5):301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bengtsson F. Therapeutic drug monitoring of psychotropic drugs. TDM “nouveau. Ther Drug Monit. 2004;26(2):145–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Egberts KM, Mehler-Wex C, Gerlach M. Therapeutic drug monitoring in child and adolescent psychiatry. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2011;44(6):249–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiemke C. Clinical utility of drug measurement and pharmacokinetics: therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64(2):159–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiemke C. Therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology: does it hold its promises? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2008;258(Suppl 1):21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaquenoud Sirot E, Knezevic B, Morena GP, Harenberg S, Oneda B, Crettol S, Ansermot N, Baumann P, Eap CB. ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 polymorphisms: clinical pharmacogenetics of clozapine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29(4):319–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaquenoud Sirot E, van der Velden JW, Rentsch K, Eap CB, Baumann P. Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic tests as tools in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2006;29(9):735–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in elderly individuals. Drug Metab Rev. 2009;41(2):67–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yada Y, Kitagawa K, Sakamoto S, Ozawa A, Nakada A, Kashiwagi H, Okahisa Y, Takao S, Takaki M, Kishi Y, et al. The relationship between plasma clozapine concentration and clinical outcome: a cross-sectional study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2021;143(3):227–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rey Souto D, Pinzón Espinosa J, Vieta E, Benabarre Hernández A. Clozapine in patients with schizoaffective disorder: a systematic review. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2021;14(3):148–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li XB, Tang YL, Wang CY, de Leon J. Clozapine for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Bipolar Disord. 2015;17(3):235–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakajima S, Takeuchi H, Fervaha G, Plitman E, Chung JK, Caravaggio F, Iwata Y, Mihashi Y, Gerretsen P, Remington G, et al. Comparative efficacy between clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics on depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: analysis of the CATIE phase 2E data. Schizophr Res. 2015;161(2–3):429–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gammon D, Cheng C, Volkovinskaia A, Baker GB, Dursun SM. Clozapine: why is it so uniquely effective in the treatment of a range of neuropsychiatric disorders? Biomolecules. 2021;11(7):1030.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas AA, Friedman JH. Current use of clozapine in Parkinson disease and related disorders. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2010;33(1):14–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Leon J, Rajkumar AP, Kaithi AR, Schoretsanitis G, Kane JM, Wang CY, Tang YL, Lin SK, Hong KS, Farooq S, et al. Do asian patients require only half of the Clozapine Dose prescribed for Caucasians? A critical overview. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020;42(1):4–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Couchman L, Morgan PE, Spencer EP, Johnston A, Flanagan RJ. Plasma clozapine and norclozapine in patients prescribed different brands of clozapine (Clozaril, Denzapine, and Zaponex). Ther Drug Monit. 2010;32(5):624–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Diaz FJ, de Leon J, Josiassen RC, Cooper TB, Simpson GM. Plasma clozapine concentration coefficients of variation in a long-term study. Schizophr Res. 2005;72(2–3):131–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mauri MC, Paletta S, Di Pace C, Reggiori A, Cirnigliaro G, Valli I, Altamura AC. Clinical pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics: an update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57(12):1493–528.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siskind D, Sharma M, Pawar M, Pearson E, Wagner E, Warren N, Kisely S. Clozapine levels as a predictor for therapeutic response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2021;144(5):422–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spina E, de Leon J. Clinical applications of CYP genotyping in psychiatry. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015;122(1):5–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruan CJ, Wang CY, Tang YL, Lin SK, Lee ST, Hong KS, Rajkumar AP, Jacob KS, de Leon J. Exploring the prevalence of Clozapine phenotypic poor metabolizers in 4 asian samples: they ranged between 2% and 13. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019;39(6):644–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dragoi AM, Radulescu I, Năsui BA, Pop AL, Varlas VN, Trifu S. Clozapine: an updated overview of pharmacogenetic biomarkers, risks, and Safety-Particularities in the Context of COVID-19. Brain Sci. 2020;10(11):840.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Castberg I, Westin AA, Skogvoll E, Spigset O. Effects of age and gender on the serum levels of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2017;136(5):455–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mayerova M, Ustohal L, Jarkovsky J, Pivnicka J, Kasparek T, Ceskova E. Influence of dose, gender, and cigarette smoking on clozapine plasma concentrations. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:1535–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jönsson AK, Spigset O, Reis M. A compilation of serum concentrations of 12 antipsychotic drugs in a therapeutic drug monitoring setting. Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41(3):348–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olesen OV, Linnet K. Contributions of five human cytochrome P450 isoforms to the N-demethylation of clozapine in vitro at low and high concentrations. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41(8):823–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van der Weide J, Steijns LS, van Weelden MJ. The effect of smoking and cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 genetic polymorphism on clozapine clearance and dose requirement. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;13(3):169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang JS, Zhu HJ, Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, Yuan HJ, Devane CL. Antipsychotic drugs inhibit the function of breast cancer resistance protein. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;103(4):336–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. de Leon J. The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: a summary of the current state for clinicians. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2015;8(2):97–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Madan A, Graham RA, Carroll KM, Mudra DR, Burton LA, Krueger LA, Downey AD, Czerwinski M, Forster J, Ribadeneira MD, et al. Effects of prototypical microsomal enzyme inducers on cytochrome P450 expression in cultured human hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(4):421–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Inui N, Akamatsu T, Uchida S, Tanaka S, Namiki N, Karayama M, Chida K, Watanabe H. Chronological effects of rifampicin discontinuation on cytochrome P450 activity in healthy japanese volunteers, using the cocktail method. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(6):702–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jeppesen U, Gram LF, Vistisen K, Loft S, Poulsen HE, Brøsen K. Dose-dependent inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 by citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;51(1):73–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sörgel F, Mahr G, Granneman GR, Stephan U, Nickel P, Muth P. Effects of 2 quinolone antibacterials, temafloxacin and enoxacin, on theophylline pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992;22(Suppl 1):65–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Carrillo JA, Benitez J. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between dietary caffeine and medications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39(2):127–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Y, Zhang H, Meng L, Wang M, Yuan H, Ou N, Zhang H, Li Z, Shi R. Influence of CYP2C19 on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH of omeprazole administered by successive intravenous infusions in chinese healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(6):563–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Capone D, Tarantino G, Gentile A, Sabbatini M, Polichetti G, Santangelo M, Nappi R, Ciotola A, D’Alessandro V, Renda A, et al. Effects of voriconazole on tacrolimus metabolism in a kidney transplant recipient. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010;35(1):121–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Faber MS, Fuhr U. Time response of cytochrome P450 1A2 activity on cessation of heavy smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76(2):178–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the researchers who participated in this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Daizhuang Hospital, Jining, 272051, China

    Taixiu Liu, Peng Gao, Chuange Xie, Heng Zhang, Zheng Shi & Ruirui Chen

Authors
  1. Taixiu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chuange Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zheng Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruirui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PG and CX initiated the study and designed the protocol. HZ, ZS and RC conducted the serum concentration test. TL collected the information and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shandong Daizhuang Hospital. In this study, participants’ names were discarded, and existing data were analysed. The need for consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Daizhuang Hospital. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Gao, P., Xie, C. et al. Study on the daily dose and serum concentration of clozapine in psychiatric patients and possible influencing factors of serum concentration. BMC Psychiatry 23, 596 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05078-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05078-z

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us