Skip to main content
Download PDF

The influence of media use degree on public depressive symptoms: mediating role of big five personality

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 616 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mixed results have been found regarding the relationship between media use degree and depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between media use degree, big five personality and depressive symptoms with a mediation model.

Method

This was a cross-sectional study. With 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) and self-designed media usage scale, 11,031 participants aged 12 and above in 120 cities in China were collected. Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis were performed on the data. The Process plug-in was used to construct the mediation model and explore the relationship among media use degree, big five personality and depressive symptoms. The nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method was used to test the mediating effect of personality traits.

Results

The degree of media use was positively correlated with depressive symptoms (r = 0.20, P < 0.001), and big five personality played a mediating role between the degree of media use and depressive symptoms. Among five traits, extroversion (r=-0.12, P < 0.001), conscientiousness (r=-0.23, P < 0.001), openness (r=-0.03, P < 0.01) and agreeableness (r=-0.22, P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms, and neuroticism (r = 0.25, P < 0.001) were positively correlated with depressive symptoms. In addition, extraversion (-0.004, -0.001), conscientiousness (-0.015, -0.008), agreeableness (-0.008, -0.001) and neuroticism (-0.015, -0.007) in big five personality played a mediating role between media use and depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

The degree of media use positively predicted depressive symptoms, and excessive media use may bring risks to mental health. People with high neuroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousness and low extroversion are more likely to suffer from depressive symptoms.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Depression is one of the most common mental disorders. Depression is a kind of emotion, which refers to the psychological state that individuals feel constrained and depressed. It is a typical negative emotional experience and can develop into depression in severe cases [1]. Depression has become one of the main causes of people’s disability and premature death [2]. Depression accounts for more disability-adjusted life years than all other mental disorders [3]. More than 300 million people worldwide suffer from depression [4]. By 2030, depression will become the largest disease burden in the world [5]. In many countries, the prevalence of depression is increasing significantly [6,7,8], especially during the COVID-19 epidemic [9]. Such as in China, Zhong found that the government’s blockade and control of Wuhan in the early stage of the epidemic led to many people’s depression [10]., and frontline healthcare workers showed the greatest severity of distress symptoms [11]. The incidence of depression in isolated people was higher during the epidemic period [12]. The confirmed and suspected infected people and frontline workers are more prone to depression, and the incidence of suicidal ideation is higher [13]. At the same time, the COVID-19 epidemic has also caused people to spend more time in the media, seeking mental health problems [14]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the mechanism of public depression, so as to provide theoretical support for its prevention and corresponding intervention strategies.

Many scholars have studied the risk factors of depression, such as low social support [15] and high life pressure [16]. As the rapid increase of media use, people are increasingly worried that the interaction with media may lead to the impairment of psychological and social functions [17]. Many studies have shown that media use, such as social media, video games, TV and movies was related to the development of public depression [18,19,20,21,22].

Media refers to the tools or carriers that people use to transmit and obtain information, including traditional media (traditional mass communication mode, media that regularly release information to the public or provide educational and entertainment platforms through a certain platform, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, etc.) and new media (using digital technology to provide users with information and services through computer networks, wireless communication networks, satellites and other channels, such as computers and mobile phones, etc.). The increase of media use function will lead to the decreased top-down attentional control associated with media multitasking [23] could disrupt active coping mechanisms that promote the rapid shift of attention away from negative stimuli [24], thereby resulting in heightened depression [25]. A group study showed that more use of the Internet would lead to less communication between participants and family members, smaller social circle and more depression and loneliness [26]. The higher the degree of internet use, the more clinical symptoms of severe depression appear with the increase of online time [27]. A study of Finns aged 12–18 found that depressed teenagers use mobile phones more than non-depressed teenagers [28]. In conclusion, the degree of media use may affect public depression. Accordingly, we propose hypothesis H1: The degree of media use can positively predict public depression.

Personality psychology points out that personality traits can distinguish stable differences among different individuals and predict behavior tendency. Personality can be characterized by a series of five dimensions, namely Big Five Personality Model [29]. According to the Big Five Personality Model, the constitution of personality has five dimensions: Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness and Neuroticism. By summarizing the research of scholars such as Brown [30] and Kendler [31], Steunenberg and others put forward that there is an established relationship between personality characteristics and depression, and the most complete etiological model of depression symptoms may need to include all three types of influencing factors: personality, health-related and social situational factors [32]. Individuals with different personality traits will show different personality tendencies. Studies have shown that extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness of Big Five personality were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms, while neuroticism was positively correlated with depressive symptoms [33]. There was also some evidence that depression was related to lower levels of extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism, and to a lesser extent, it was related to conscientiousness and openness [34]. In depression, neuroticism is the most common and the most serious [35]. Neuroticism is a personality structure characterized by emotional response, anxiety and negative emotions [36], which is widely considered to be related to the high risk of depression [37, 38].

According to the cognitive affective personality system (CAPS) theory, the personality state changes [39]. Personality state is the activation mode of cognition and emotion in personality system at a certain moment, which has variability [40]. With its powerful function, the media changes the public’s cognition and plays the role of activator at some important moments. The utility and function of mass media is an important part of people’s personality formation [41]. The use of media can exert a subtle influence on personality [42].

The degree of media use has different effects on depression due to personality factors [43]. Some scholars found that there was a positive correlation between media use and mental health [44]. Some scholars even thought that media use had both positive and negative effects on depression [45]. Besides, some scholars have found that there was no relationship between media use and depression [46]. The results of whether the degree of media use leads to depression are mixed, and no clear conclusion can be drawn, so further research is needed [47,48,49]. Shakya and Christakis found that the use of Facebook was related to the low level of subjective well-being, but unfortunately the role of personality traits in it was not verified [50]. Therefore, it is particularly important to clarify what role Big Five personality plays between the degree of media use and public depression.

To sum up, it is necessary to explore the mediating role of the five personality types of Big Five personality in the degree of media use and depression. This study puts forward the hypothesis H2: Big Five personality plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression. H2a: Extroversion plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression. H2b: Conscientiousness plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression. H2c: Agreeableness plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression. H2d: Openness plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression. H2e: Neuroticism plays an intermediary role between the degree of media use and depression.

Some studies have found that individuals of different genders have different possibilities of depression. In essence, women are more likely to suffer from depression, and they are also more susceptible to some significant social factors that induce or activate depression [51]. Women have more incidence of depression than men in the whole life cycle or at the beginning of puberty, which is related to the fact that women experience or produce more stressors at the beginning of puberty [52]. Scarinci found that young women were more likely to show depressive symptoms than older women [53]. The higher the education level of women, the less likely they were to show depressive symptoms. The influence of education level on depression is not limited to women. Bjelland found that, for both men and women, higher education level plays a protective role in lifelong depression, but men have stronger correlation in the relationship between education level and depression [54]. The level of education and income represent the level of people’s social and economic status. Higher social and economic status, that is, good educational background, higher income and family property, is conducive to reducing the degree of depression [55]. Therefore, we also made an exploratory analysis to test the controlling effect of age, education level and family economic status.

Individuals are in the era of media, and ubiquitous media information contact plays an important role in influencing public depression. Depression is a process of complex interaction between individuals and many social factors, which is intertwined with media information ecology and personality traits. Therefore, this study takes 11,031 people in China as the research object, combines the hypothesis theory of media information ecology and personality traits, takes age, education level and family economic status as the control variables, explores the mechanism path that the degree of media use affects depression. By constructing an intermediary model (Fig. 1), the mediating role of five personality types between the degree of media use and depressive symptoms was investigated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The theoretical model hypothesis diagram

Full size image

Methods

Data collection

This survey was conducted by multistage sampling from July 10th, 2021 to September 15th, 2021. A total of 23 provinces, 5 autonomous regions and 4 municipalities (Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing) in China were included. Using the random number table method, 2–6 cities are selected from the non-provincial administrative regions of each province and autonomous region, totaling 120 cities. Next, openly recruit investigators or investigation teams (consisting of ≤ 10 people) in these cities. Based on the data of the “Results of the Seventh National Census in 2021”, 120 urban residents were sampled by quota (the quota attributes are gender, age and urban-rural distribution), so that the gender, age and urban-rural distribution of the samples obtained basically conform to the demographic characteristics. Finally, with the help of the Internet Questionnaires Platform (https://www.wjx.cn/), the investigators distributed online questionnaires to the public face to face and one to one in their respective regions, and the respondents answered them by clicking on the link. The informed consent of the subjects was obtained during the investigation, and the questionnaire number was input by the investigator. If the respondent has thinking ability but not enough action ability to answer the questionnaire, the investigator will conduct one-on-one inquiry and answer it instead.

Outcome measures

In this study, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to evaluate depressive symptoms [56]. The PHQ-9 was previously translated into Chinese and validated by researchers in China [57, 58]. There were 9 items in the scale, including four options: Not at all, Several days, More than half the days, and Nearly every day. The scale was assigned 0–3 in turn (Not at all = 0, Nearly every day = 3), and the score was between 0 and 27. The scale conforms to DSM-V standard and is used to identify depression. The higher the score of the respondents, the more serious the depressive symptoms were. The Cronbach’s alpha of the PHQ-9 was 0.94. Through KMO and spherical Bartlett test, KMO statistic was 0.88, and spherical test P < 0.01, which indicated that factor analysis was appropriate. Two factors were extracted from nine variables (items), and the total variance of the two factors was 52.38%[59].

A 7-item self-made scale was used to measure the frequency of media use. In order to know how the participants use the media, the members of the research team consulted books and literature scientifically and comprehensively, and then designed a questionnaire to ensure that the questionnaire was suitable for measuring the media use of all people [60]. There were 7 items in the scale, which respectively know the contact frequency of respondents to seven kinds of media: newspapers, magazines, radio, television, books (non-textbooks), personal computers (including tablets) and smart phones. The scale has five options: Never use, Occasionally use (≤ 1 day/week), Sometimes use (2 ~ 3 days/week), Frequently use (4 ~ 5 days/week) and Almost every day (6 ~ 7 days/week), which were assigned to 1–5 in turn (Never use = 1, Almost every day = 5). The number of days that the measured person used various media in one week was used as the scoring basis, and the total score of each option was added as the scoring result, with a total score of 35 points. The higher the score, the more frequently the measured person uses the media. The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.70. Through KMO and spherical Bartlett test, KMO statistic was 0.74, and spherical test P < 0.01, which indicated that factor analysis was appropriate. Two factors were extracted from seven variables (items), and the total variance of the two factors was 61.80%. Confirmatory factor analysis of the convergence validity of the media use scale showed that CMIN/DF = 2.44 and RMSEA (root mean square error) was within the range of < 0.05. The test results of GFI, TLI, IFI and CFI all reached the excellent level of above 0.9. The convergence validity (AVE) and combination reliability (CR) of each dimension of the scale were tested. The results showed that the standard load range of the scale items was higher than 0.5 from 0.57 to 0.87, the value of AVE is 0.52 higher than 0.5, and the value of CR is 0.88 higher than 0.7. Therefore, the scale used in this study has good convergence validity and combination reliability.

The 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) was used to assess personality [61]. The scale consists of 10 items, which measure five factors of personality, namely extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness and neuroticism. Ten items include five options: Strongly disagree, a little disagree, neither agree nor disagree, a little agree and very agree. The scores of these five options are 0–4 from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Among them, 5 items were scored positively and 5 items are scored reversely. The higher the score of each dimension, the more obvious the personality trait is. Through KMO and spherical Bartlett test, KMO statistic was 0.68, and spherical test P < 0.01, which indicated that factor analysis was appropriate. The factor load was 0.41 ~ 0.97, discriminant correlations for the BFI-10 were all < 0.4, the validity of the scale was acceptable [62].

Statistical analyses

SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. The data that do not obey the normal distribution were represented by M (QL, QU), and chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis were carried out, and nonparametric percentile Bootstrap method was used for model construction and intermediary effect test. Using Process plug-in V2.16.3 to verify the mediation model, the 95% confidence interval of the mediation effect was estimated by extracting 5000 samples from the original samples. If the confidence interval did not contain 0, it indicates that the intermediary effect exists. otherwise, the intermediary effect did not exist, α = 0.05.

Results

Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA

A total of 11,031 valid questionnaires were collected in this study. Among them, 5998 were women and 5033 were men. 1065 people aged ≤ 18 years, 5332 people aged 19–40 years, 3795 people aged 41–65 years and 875 people aged ≥ 66 years (According to the age of minors [63], young people [64], middle-aged and old people [65]). There were 1,127 people with primary school education or below, 1,439 people with junior high school education, 1,978 people with secondary school education or high school education, 5,750 people with college education or above, and 737 people with master’s and doctoral degrees. There were 3,246 families with a monthly income of ≤ 3,000, 5,325 families with a monthly income of 3,001–7,500, and 2,460 families with a monthly income of ≥ 7,501 (Table 1).

The differences of depressive symptoms were statistically significant (P < 0.001) in gender, age, education level and family economic status, indicating that these factors have a significant impact on residents’ depressive symptoms.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics (N = 11,031)
Full size table

Common method bias

As for statistical control, this study adopted Harman single factor test, and made exploratory factor analysis on all items of research variables. The results showed that the eigenvalues of six factors were greater than 1, and the variance explained by the first factor is 25.71%, which was less than the critical standard of 40%. Therefore, it can be concluded that there was no serious common methodological deviation in this study.

Scores on media use, big five personality, depressive symptoms among participants

The scores of all scales of the included people were shown in Table 2. The total score of the media use scale was 19(16,22), newspapers, magazines and broadcast had similar scores, and smartphones scored the highest, with 5(4,5). It showed that Chinese citizens were more inclined to smart phones in media use. The subjects’ scores of big five personality Scale were similar, with the highest score of 7(6,8) for agreeableness and the lowest score of6(5,6) for neuroticism. The subjects’ total score of depressed symptoms scale was 5(1,9).

Table 2 Scores of several scales among subjects (N = 11,031)
Full size table

Relationship between media use, big five personality and depressive symptoms

Table 3 showed the correlation among media use degree, big five personality and depressive symptoms. The results showed that media use degree (r = 0.20, P < 0.001) was positively correlated with depressive symptoms. Media use degree was positively correlated with extraversion (r = 0.03, P < 0.01), conscientiousness (r = 0.04, P < 0.001), openness (r = 0.15, P < 0.001), agreeableness (r = 0.04, P < 0.001) of the big five personality Scale,and negatively correlated with neuroticism (r=-0.05, P < 0.001). Among the big five personality, extraversion (r=-0.12, P < 0.001), conscientiousness (r=-0.23, P < 0.001), openness (r=-0.03, P < 0.01), agreeableness (r=-0.22, P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms, and positively correlated with neuroticism (r = 0.25, P < 0.001). In addition, age (r=-0.07, P < 0.001) and family economic status (r=-0.05, P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with depressive symptoms, while education degree (r = 0.05, P < 0.001) was positively correlated with depressive symptoms.

Table 3 Correlation analysis of related factors of depressive symptoms (r)
Full size table

Hierarchical regression analysis of predictive variables on depressive symptoms

In order to further explore the influence of each predictor on personal depressive symptoms, this study conducted hierarchical regression analysis (Table 4). Firstly, the age, education level and family economic status were put into the equation. Age (b=-0.06, P < 0.001), education degree (b = 0.05, P < 0.001) and average household monthly income (b=-0.07, P < 0.001) had significant influence on depressive symptoms. R2 was 0.01. Secondly, media use was the second factor in the equation. Media use degree (b = 0.21, P < 0.001) had become a significant influencing factor of personal depressive symptoms, which showed that the deeper personal media use, the more likely it was to be depressed. At this time, R2 increased from 0.01 to 0.05. Finally, the five dimensions of big five personality, an intermediary variable, were introduced into the model. At this time, the influence of media use degree on depressive symptoms was still statistically significant, and the partial regression coefficient increased from 0.21 to 0.24. The extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness and neuroticism in the big five personalities had statistical significance on depressive symptoms. R2 increased from 0.05 to 0.16. Among them, extraversion (b=-0.23, P < 0.001), conscientiousness (b=-0.53, P < 0.001), agreeableness (b=-0.52, P < 0.001) and depressive symptoms were negative predictors, neuroticism (b = 0.66, P < 0.001) had a positive predictive effect on depressive symptoms, openness (b=-0.01, P > 0.05) had nothing to do with depressive symptoms. The results showed that big five personality and media use degree were the influencing factors of depressive symptoms.

Table 4 Hierarchical regression analysis of depressive symptoms (b)
Full size table

Mediation analysis of big five personality

According to the regression results and research hypothesis, this study conducted an intermediary effect test, in order to clarify the mechanism that the degree of media use affects personal depressive symptoms. The Fig. 2 showed that media use was significantly related to the five dimensions of big five personality. Consistent with the results of hierarchical regression, neuroticism (b = 0.66, P < 0.001) in big five personality had a significant positive impact on personal depressive symptoms, extroversion (b=-0.23, P < 0.001), conscientiousness (b=-0.53, P < 0.001) and agreeableness (b=-0.52, P < 0.001) had a significant negative impact on personal depressive symptoms.

After in-depth analysis of the results of intermediary effect test, it is found that after controlling the three variables of age, education level and family economic status, the direct effect of media use degree on depressive symptoms was [Effect = 0.27, 95%CI (0.25,0.29)], which indicates that the deeper the use of media, the easier it was to have depressive symptoms (Table 5). And the indirect effect of media use degree on depressive symptoms was [Effect=-0.03, 95%CI (-0.04, -0.03)], it shows that Big Five personality has a mediating effect in the relationship between the degree of media use and depressive symptoms. Among them, the confidence interval of extroversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness and neuroticism of Big Five personality did not contain 0, which played an intermediary effect between the degree of media use and depressive symptoms.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The intermediary verification model of big five personality. ***P＜0.001,**P＜0.01,*P＜0.05

Full size image
Table 5 Path coefficient of mediating effect model
Full size table

Discussion

This study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the degree of media use and depressive symptoms, and the deeper the degree of media use, the easier it was to be depressed. Assume H1 holds, which was consistent with the existing research results [22]. The use of media may promote the development of depression by strengthening the cognition of depression [66]. Public exposure to different media content may lead to depression [67]. In particular, the frequent occurrence of some negative contents such as bullying and harassment has a negative impact on people’s psychology. In the process of communication, members of online community with depression may be exposed to other members’ negative emotions, thus causing a significant increase in anxiety, anger and other negative emotions, and even the risk of suicide [68]. Although some studies have shown that online interaction between depressed patients and other users can help to relieve depressive symptoms [69], but this is only the interaction of positive emotions [70].

Through literature review, Chen found that most studies in western countries support that media use leads to an increase in individual depression, but the study with China as the subjects confirms that media use has a significant negative predictive effect on depression [71]. On the contrary, the conclusion of this paper supports the positive prediction of depressive symptoms by media use. It may be due to the different intermediary variables used [71]. For example, Yan takes online capital as an mediating variable, and draws the conclusion that the intensity of media use significantly negatively predicts depression [72], while the mediating variable in this study is personality traits.

Although previous studies have shown that media use has an impact on depressed state, the effects of personality traits on media use and depressed state have not been fully studied [73]. We studied whether personality traits play a role between media use and depressive symptoms. This study found that extroversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness and neuroticism in Big Five personality all played a mediating role between the degree of media use and depression. People with high neuroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousness and low extroversion are more likely to suffer from depression. Assume H2a, H2b, H2c and H2e hold, which was consistent with the research results of Giota and Kleftaras [74]. People with high neuroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousness and low extroversion use media more deeply. Individuals with low extroversion (i.e. introversion) are more likely to use SNS and other technologies to meet their communication needs [75]. Because people with low extroversion and low agreeableness are difficult to establish friendship offline [76]. Butt and Phillips describe that those who were highly neurotic might use the Internet to avoid loneliness [77]. Highly neuroticism individuals prefer to present their ideal and false self on Facebook [78, 79]. Frequent contact with these idealized media images may have a negative impact on the happiness of neuroticism, because they will have more negative emotions after comparing with the unfavorable social reality [80]. Compared with non-neuroticism women, highly neuroticism women show greater dissatisfaction with their bodies after being exposed to the idealized images presented by the media [81]. The media environment full of perfect life pictures may be more threatening to the mental health of highly neurotic people than the offline social world [82, 83].

Research showed that openness had no mediating effect, assuming that H2d was not established. In the past studies, it was often found that there was no significant correlation between openness and depression [84]. Openness is divided into six narrow levels: fantasy, aesthetics, feelings, actions, thoughts and values [85]. However, the relationship between these six dimensions and depression is not the same, only the aesthetic aspect is positively correlated with depression, and the other five aspects are not significant [86]. This may lead to no significant openness and depression. But some scholars believe that there is a positive correlation between openness and depressive symptoms [87]. People with fantasy may suffer from depression, because their ideal state is quite different from their actual state, which is more likely to lead to disappointment and sadness [88]. In future research, researchers need to further explore the relationship between openness and depressive symptoms.

The analysis also showed that people’s age and family economic status were significantly related to media use and depression. The younger the age, the worse the family economic situation, the higher the degree of media use and depression. Chen surveyed 886 junior high school students in three full-time middle schools in Wuhan, and found that excessive use of social networking sites has a significant positive predictive effect on depression [89]. Some studies have shown that three quarters of lifelong mental illness begins before the age of 24[90], and compared with the children of non-floating parents, the risk of depression among left-behind children and adolescents is significantly higher [91]. People with poor economic conditions are more likely to remain in a depressive symptoms, which was consistent with the research results of Chang [92].

Strengths

Through the analysis of data collected nationwide, this study verified another factor that affects depression-the degree of media use, which has outstanding theoretical value and practical significance. It was found that the degree of media use has a positive effect on depression, and the more frequently media use, the greater the possibility of depression. At the same time, the degree of media use also has the mediating effect of Big Five personalities, and different personalities have different manifestations in the degree of media use and the possibility of depression.

Limitations

There are some limitations in this research. First of all, people’s media usage only measures the usage days of different media, but can’t fully present the content type and purpose of people’s specific media usage. Secondly, this is a cross-sectional study. Although it is suitable for our research hypothesis, it does not allow us to draw causal conclusions. In the future research, in terms of causal explanation, we can compare people with depression and people without depression through experimental control design, and explore the influence of media on depression. At the same time, this research uses self-report and this is a limit because it increases the risk for social desirability in the responses. Qualitative research methods such as in-depth interviews can be added to further explore the relationship among media, personality and depression, and enhance the persuasiveness of the results.

Conclusions

This study investigated the relationship between the degree of media use, Big Five personality and depression. The results showed that the degree of media use aggravated people’s depression, and people with high neuroticism, low agreeableness, low conscientiousness and low extroversion were more likely to suffer from depression. The conscious use of media to protect mental health is an important topic in our society. Time spent in the media may pose a risk to a person’s mental health. In order to protect ourselves from the negative effects of media use, it is important to know our personality and how media use affects our mental health. Especially for people with neurotic personality characteristics, they are more likely to suffer from depression.

Data Availability

Data are available, upon reasonable request, by emailing: wuyibo@bjmu.edu.cn.

References

  1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale:A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. 1977, 1(3):385–401.

  2. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. The Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vos TP, Flaxman ADP, Abdalla SM, AlMazroa MAMD, Alvarado MBA, Andrews KGMPH, Barrero LHS, Bhalla KP, Blencowe HM, Bolliger IAB, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet (British edition). 2012;380(9859):2197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Organization WH. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland;; 2017.

  5. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany EC, Abera SF, Abraham JP, Adofo K, Alsharif U et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. 2016, 22(1):3–18.

  6. Fleming TM, Clark T, Denny S, Bullen P, Crengle S, Peiris-John R, Robinson E, Rossen FV, Sheridan J, Lucassen M. Stability and change in the mental health of New Zealand secondary school students 2007–2012: results from the national adolescent health surveys. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48(5):472–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hölling H, Schlack R, Petermann F, Ravens-Sieberer U, Mauz E, Group KS. Psychopathological problems and psychosocial impairment in children and adolescents aged 3–17 years in the german population: prevalence and time trends at two measurement points (2003–2006 and 2009–2012): results of the KiGGS study: first follow-up (KiGGS Wave 1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57(7):807–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Soest T, Wichstrøm L. Secular Trends in depressive symptoms among norwegian adolescents from 1992 to 2010. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42(3):403–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez-Hidalgo AJ, Pantaleón Y, Dios I, Falla D. Fear of COVID-19, stress, and anxiety in University undergraduate students: a predictive model for Depression. Front Psychol. 2020;11:591797.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhong B, Huang Y, Liu Q. Mental health toll from the coronavirus: social media usage reveals Wuhan residents’ depression and secondary trauma in the COVID-19 outbreak. Comput Hum Behav. 2021;114:106524.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, Wu J, Du H, Chen T, Li R, et al. Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes among Health Care Workers exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen X, Chen Y, Chen B, Ao H, Yang Y, Yang Y, Liu F, Wang Z, Ke W, Luo X. Statusand factors of Anxiety/depression during centralized quarantineunder the epidemic of COVIID-19. China J Health Psychol. 2020;28(9):1350–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi L, Que J-Y, Lu Z-A, Gong Y-M, Liu L, Wang Y-H, Ran M-S, Ravindran N, Ravindran AV, Fazel S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among the general population in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64(1):e18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey E, Boland A, Bell I, Nicholas J, La Sala L, Robinson J. The Mental Health and Social Media Use of Young Australians during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2022, 19(3):1077.

  15. Galambos NL, Leadbeater BJ, Barker ET. Gender differences in and risk factors for depression in adolescence: a 4-year longitudinal study. Int J Behav Dev. 2004;28(1):16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sigurvinsdottir R, Asgeirsdottir BB, Ullman SE, Sigfusdottir ID. The impact of sexual abuse, family Violence/Conflict, spirituality, and Religion on anger and depressed Mood among Adolescents. J interpers Violence. 2017;36(1–2):NP577–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shapira NA, Lessig MC, Goldsmith TD, Szabo ST, Lazoritz M, Gold MS, Stein DJ. Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety. 2003;17(4):207–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bickham DS, Hswen Y, Rich M. Media use and depression: exposure, household rules, and symptoms among young adolescents in the USA. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(2):147–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalvez MT, Espada JP, Tejeiro R. Problem video game playing is related to emotional distress in adolescents/El uso problemdtico de videojuegos estd relacionado con problemas emocionales en adolescentes. Adicciones. 2017;29:180–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holfeld B, Sukhawathanakul P. Associations between Internet attachment, Cyber victimization, and internalizing symptoms among adolescents. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2017;20(2):91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kross E, Verduyn P, Demiralp E, Park J, Lee DS, Lin N, Shablack H, Jonides J, Ybarra O. Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e69841.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu M, Wu L, Yao S. Dose–response association of screen time-based sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents and depression: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(20):1252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(37):15583–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mogg K, Bradley B, Miles F, Dixon R. BRIEF REPORT Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cogn Emot. 2004;18(5):689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker MW, Alzahabi R, Hopwood CJ. Media Multitasking is Associated with symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2013;16(2):132–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukopadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol. 1998;53(9):1017–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Strickland A. Exploring the Effects of Social Media Use on the Mental Health of Young Adults. HIM 1990–2015 2014:1684.

  28. Koivusilta LK, Lintonen TP, Rimpelä AH. Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: a digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(1):95–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Toward a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In: Wiggins JS, editor. The five-factor model of personality: theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford; 1996. pp. 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brown GW, Harris T. Social origins of depression: a reply. Psychol Med. 1978;8(4):577–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kendler K, Kessler R, Neale M, Heath AC, Eaves L. The prediction of major depression in women: toward an integrated etiological model. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:1139–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steunenberg B, Beekman ATF, Deeg DJH, Kerkhof AJFM. Personality and the onset of depression in late life. J Affect Disord. 2006;92(2):243–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nikčević AV, Marino C, Kolubinski DC, Leach D, Spada MM. Modelling the contribution of the big five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2021;279:578–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van der Aa N, Overbeek G, Engels RCME, Scholte RHJ, Meerkerk G-J, Van den Eijnden RJJM. Daily and compulsive internet use and well-being in adolescence: a diathesis-stress model based on big five personality traits. J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38(6):765–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bienvenu OJ, Samuels JF, Costa PT, Reti IM, Eaton WW, Nestadt G. Anxiety and depressive disorders and the five-factor model of personality: a higher- and lower-order personality trait investigation in a community sample. Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(2):92–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lahey BB. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am Psychol. 2009;64(4):241–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bunevicius A, Katkute A, Bunevicius R. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical students and in Humanities students: Relationship with Big-Five personality dimensions and vulnerability to stress. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008;54(6):494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klein DN, Kotov R, Bufferd SJ. Personality and depression: explanatory models and review of the evidence. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7(1):269–95.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu M, Xu Y, Ye H, Zhang Y, Zhao H, Gao H. Personality variability: the study of personality change from the perspective of individuals. Chin J Special Educ 2020(02):83–90.

  40. Mischel W. Toward an integrative science of the person. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:1–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Malik DD. The role of Mass Communication in shaping changes in culture and people’s behavior in Indonesia. Budapest Int Res Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). 2022;5(2):17775–85.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Andrews NP, Yogeeswaran K, Wang M-J, Nash K, Hawi DR, Sibley CG. Is Social Media Use changing who we are? Examining the bidirectional relationship between personality and Social Media Use. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2020;23(11):752–60.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dalbudak E, Evren C, Aldemir S, Coskun KS, Ugurlu H, Yildirim FG. Relationship of internet addiction severity with Depression, anxiety, and Alexithymia, temperament and character in University students. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2013;16(4):272–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gerson J, Plagnol AC, Corr PJ. Subjective well-being and social media use: do personality traits moderate the impact of social comparison on Facebook? Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:813–22.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Frost RL, Rickwood DJ. A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;76:576–600.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pantic I. Social networking and depression: an emerging issue in behavioral physiology and psychiatric research. J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(6):745–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Baker DA, Algorta GP. The relationship between online social networking and Depression: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2016;19(11):638–48.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blease CR. Too many ‘Friends,’ too few ‘Likes’? Evolutionary psychology and ‘Facebook Depression’. Rev Gen Psychol. 2015;19(1):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seabrook EM, Kern ML, Rickard NS. Social networking Sites, Depression, and anxiety: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(4):e50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Shakya HB, Christakis NA. Association of Facebook Use with compromised Well-Being: a longitudinal study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(3):203–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Parker G, Brotchie H. Gender differences in depression. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):429–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Girgus JS, Yang K. Gender and depression. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;4:53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Scarinci IC, Beech BM, Naumann W, Kovach KW, Pugh L, Fapohunda B. Depression, Socioeconomic Status, Age, and Marital Status in Black Women: a National Study. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(3):421–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bjelland I, Krokstad S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Tell GS, Tambs K. Does a higher educational level protect against anxiety and depression? The HUNT study. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(6):1334–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhao X, Ruan H. Socioeconomic gradients in depressive symptoms among chinese Adults———Evidence from the 2014-2016 China Family Panel Studies Data. Social Sci Beijing 2019(08):34–47.

  56. Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81(1):61–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lai BPY, Tang AKL, Lee DTS, Yip ASK, Chung TKH. Detecting postnatal depression in chinese men: a comparison of three instruments. Psychiatry Res. 2010;180(2):80–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang Y-L, Liang W, Chen Z-M, Zhang H-M, Zhang J-H, Weng X-Q, Yang S-C, Zhang L, Shen L-J, Zhang Y-L. Validity and reliability of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 to screen for depression among college students in China. 2013, 5(4):268–75.

  59. Jin T, Chen S, Shen Y, Fu G. The reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) in the Elderly Populationin Community. Prev Med. 2011;23(06):27–9.

    Google Scholar 

  60. den Hamer AH, Konijn EA, Plaisier XS, Keijer MG, Krabbendam LC, Bushman BJ. The content-based media exposure scale (C-ME): development and validation. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;72:549–57.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003;37(6):504–28.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Carciofo R, Yang J, Song N, Du F, Zhang K. Psychometric evaluation of Chinese-Language 44-Item and 10-Item big five personality inventories, including correlations with chronotype, mindfulness and mind wandering. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0149963.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China: Minors protection law of People’s Republic of China (PRC). 2005. https://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-05/26/content_982.htm.((accessed August 7, 2023).

  64. Li G. On the age division standard of “youth”. Youth Stud 1994(05):7–8.

  65. Zhao Y, Smith JP, Strauss JJL. Can China age healthily? Lancet 2014, 384(9945):723.

  66. Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR. Major depressive disorder in older adolescents: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18(7):765–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Primack BA, Swanier B, Georgiopoulos AM, Land SR, Fine MJ. Association between Media Use in Adolescence and Depression in Young Adulthood: a longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(2):181–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lu Y, Pan T, Liu J, Wu J. Does usage of online social media help users with depressed symptoms improve their Mental Health? Empirical evidence from an Online Depression Community. Front Public Health. 2021;8:581088.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Chasombat P, Karuchit W. Digitally depressed: the Effects of Digital Media usage in regard to Depression and Approaches for Alleviation for individuals and the Society. Communication and Media in Asia Pacific (CMAP). 2020;3(1):13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wooten P. Humor: an antidote for stress. Holist Nurs Pract 1996, 10(2).

  71. Chen G, Zhang W. Relationship between Social Network Sites Use and Depression. J Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences). 2018;63(1):100–9.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yan J, Wu L, Sun M, Cui J, Liang Q. The Effect of Social Network Sites Use on Adolescent Depression: the Mediating Role of Online Social Capital. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2016;24(2):317–20.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Chow TS, Wan HY. Is there any ‘Facebook Depression’? Exploring the moderating roles of neuroticism, Facebook social comparison and envy. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;119:277–82.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Giota K, Kleftaras G. The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in Greece. Cyberpsychology 2013, 7.

  75. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Wainapel G, Fox S. On the internet no one knows I’m an Introvert”: Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2002;5(2):125–8.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Landers RN, Lounsbury JW. An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Comput Hum Behav. 2006;22(2):283–93.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Butt S, Phillips JG. Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24(2):346–60.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Michikyan M, Subrahmanyam K, Dennis J. Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online self-presentation among young adults. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;33:179–83.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Seidman G. Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: how personality influences social media use and motivations. Pers Indiv Differ. 2013;54(3):402–7.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Buunk BP, Van Der Zee K, VanYperen NW. Neuroticism and Social Comparison Orientation as moderators of affective responses to Social Comparison at Work. J Pers. 2001;69(5):745–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Roberts A, Good E. Media images and female body dissatisfaction: the moderating effects of the five-factor traits. Eat Behav. 2010;11(4):211–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mehdizadeh S. Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2010;13(4):357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Nadkarni A, Hofmann SG. Why do people use Facebook? Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;52(3):243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Hayward RD, Taylor WD, Smoski MJ, Steffens DC, Payne ME. Association of five-factor Model Personality Domains and Facets with Presence, Onset, and treatment outcomes of Major Depression in older adults. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2013;21(1):88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Khoo S, Simms LJ. Links between depression and openness and its facets. Personality and Mental Health. 2018;12(3):203–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wolfestein M, Trull TJ. Depression and openness to experience. J Pers Assess. 1997;69(3):614–32.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Wang T, Li QS, Liu HR, Jian WY. Urban-rural differentials in the relationship between personality traits and changes in depressive symptoms. J Peking Univ (Health sciences). 2023;55(3):385–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Khoo S, Simms LJ. Links between depression and openness and its facets. 2018, 12(3):203–15.

  89. Chen C, Lian S, Sun X, Chai H, Zhou Z. The Effect of Social Network Sites Addiction on Adolescents’Depression: Mediating ï¼²ole of cognitive overload and core self-evaluation. Psychol Dev Educ. 2018;34(02):210–8.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Fellmeth G, Rose-Clarke K, Zhao C, Busert LK, Zheng Y, Massazza A, Sonmez H, Eder B, Blewitt A, Lertgrai W, et al. Health impacts of parental migration on left-behind children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2018;392(10164):2567–82.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Chang Y, Zheng X, Li M, Xue Y, Hou L, Zheng J, Zhang C. Depressive symptoms prevalence and influencing factors among Urban and Rural Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases. Chin Gen Pract. 2021;24(10):1254–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific research project of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department in 2021-the key research base project of philosophy and social sciences (Grand: 21JZ017).

Funding

It was funded by the National Ethnic Affairs Commission’s National Culture Research Center along the Southwest Silk Road (Jishou University).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Literature and Journalism Communication, Jishou University, Jishou, China

    Fangmin Gong & Yuhan Jia

  2. School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Xinying Sun, Hewei Min & Yibo Wu

  3. School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Xiaocen Jia

  4. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Fei Wang

  5. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, China

    Xincheng Huang

  6. Department of Stomatology, North Sichuan Medical College, Sichaun, China

    Xin Lin

  7. School of basic medicine, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

    Zheming Li

  8. Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, 120 Renmin South Road, Jishou City, Hunan Province, China

    Yuhan Jia

  9. 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Yibo Wu

Authors
  1. Fangmin Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuhan Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinying Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hewei Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaocen Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xincheng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zheming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yibo Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FG, YW and YJ designed the research questions. YW, XS, HM, XJ and FW designed the questionnaire. YJ, FG and YW made data analysis and interpretation of the survey results. FG and YJ wrote the first draft of the paper. HM, XJ, FW, XH, XL and ZL revised the manuscript and gave scientific opinions. FG and YJ finished the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuhan Jia or Yibo Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study scheme was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Ji’nan University, Guangzhou, China (JNUKY-2021-018). All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Respondents were informed that their participation was voluntary. All participants provided informed consent to participate in the study (Minor participants have obtained the informed consent of their parents and/or legal guardians).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, F., Jia, Y., Sun, X. et al. The influence of media use degree on public depressive symptoms: mediating role of big five personality. BMC Psychiatry 23, 616 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05097-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05097-w

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us