Skip to main content
Download PDF

Validation of the Arabic version of the cyberchondria severity scale 12 items (CSS-12-Ar) among a sample of Lebanese adults

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 618 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To the best of our knowledge, the Cyberchondria Severity Scale-12 (CSS-12) has not been translated into Arabic; therefore, our objective was to assess the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the CSS (CSS-12-Ar) among a sample of Lebanese adults.

Methods

Participants were enrolled in January 2021. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out using the MPlus software v.7.2, reporting several goodness-of-fit indicators: Relative Chi-square (χ2/df), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Tucker Lewis Index (TLI). To evaluate measurement invariance across gender, we conducted higher-order multiple group confirmatory analysis using lavaan software.

Results

449 participants enrolled in this study (mean age: 24.34 ± 8.22 years, 70.6% females). Since the correlations between the four-factor model were very high (r > 0.8), we ran the higher-order CFA in which all first-order latent variables were loading a general factor. The analyzed model was well-fitted to the data χ2(50) = 173.34; p < 0.001; CFI = 0.926; RMSEA = 0.074 [0.062, 0.086]. The Cronbach’s alpha values were good for the total score (0.92), as well as for excessiveness (0.80), distress (0.77), reassurance (0.81) and compulsion (0.76). The results provided evidence of full scalar invariance across gender. The comparison of latent mean scores revealed no significant differences across gender, in either the cyberchondria total score or its facets. The CSS-12 score was positively associated with anxiety (r = 0.10; p = 0.003) (convergent validity), OCD (r = 0.11; p = 0.016) and stress (r = 0.35; p < 0.001) (concurrent validity).

Conclusion

The CSS-12-Ar was deemed a suitable scale to measure the severity of cyberchondria among Lebanese university students. We hope that researchers and clinicians can benefit now from this scale.

Peer Review reports

Background

With the increasing impact of digital technology, subjects using the Internet as a source for health information is steadily increasing. In terms of prevalence, it is estimated that 62% of American adults search for health information online; thus constituting the fifth most common online activity [1]. The numbers in Saudi Arabia were even higher than those in the United States, with 88% of the participants in a study searching for health information [2]. In terms of efficiency, different studies have focused on the benefits of searching online for health information [3, 4], among others the ease of access to information, anonymity, the search process is cost-effective, patient empowerment and support provided in the context of informed decision-making [5, 6]. However, the majority of studies have focused on the misdeeds of this research. For example, a previous study conducted by Lauckner and Hsieh (2013) [7] focused on negative emotional responses related to seeking health information online. Other studies have also highlighted the association between this type of research and the escalation of health anxiety [8], as well as the increased risk of developing anxiety disorders [9]. Recently, researchers coined the term “cyberchondria” to describe this process of heightened anxiety about physical health due to excessive searching for health information online [10]. Cyberchondria is defined as “an excessive or repeated research for health-related information on the Internet, driven by distress or anxiety about health, which amplifies such distress or anxiety” [10]. In this context, cyberchondria combines a behavioral pattern (i.e., over-researching the web) with a subsequent emotional state (i.e., excessive concern about health). Thus, the main feature of cyberchondria is the escalation/excessiveness element, whereby subjects spend excessive and increasing amount of time searching for information [11, 12].

To assess cyberchondria, McElroy and Shevlin developed the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-33 items) on a sample of 190 undergraduates [13]. The CSS was shown to have satisfactory psychometric qualities and high internal reliability (Cronbach alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.95). It has also been demonstrated to have strong concurrent and convergent validity (13). Despite its adequate psychometric properties, recommendations to refine the CSS were suggested by removing the “Mistrust” factor due to its theoretical ambiguity, its weak correlation with the other factors of the scale and its failure to load on the total cyberchondria score [14]. The validation was reproduced in a community sample by Norr and colleagues [15]. Their findings indicated that an orthogonal general factor with four subfactors provides the greatest model fit and that mistrust of medical professionals does not belong to the cyberchondria construct. In terms of contemporaneous validity, the CSS was found to have favorable relationships with health anxiety [15, 16] and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale [13]. Furthermore, the scale has been criticized for its length and the inclusion of several items that may not be relevant or specific to cyberchondria [12, 17]. Barke et al. created a shortened version of the CSS (CSS-15 items) [17], but it showed a lower internal consistency the total and subscales scores than the original scale. In a second attempt, twelve items were chosen to be retained based on the exploratory factor analysis, creating a brief, reliable, and valid measure of cyberchondria (CSS-12), divided into four previously identified factors: Compulsion, Distress, Excessiveness, and Reassurance. Confirmatory bifactor modeling showed that the CSS-12 is best scored as a unidimensional scale, although the subscales may provide useful additional information [18].

The CSS is validated in multiple languages, including but not limited to Italian [19], Turkish [20], German [17], Polish [21], Brazilian Portuguese [22], and Russian [23]. Scales’ translation to a different language might result in non-equivalent measures especially in science/health since the language and culture might influence those outcomes [24]. In 2018, the world economic forum listed online misinformation as one of the top ten threats to humans [25]. Research has emphasized that misinformation can lead to health anxiety [26], poor health outcomes [27], and impairment leading to inability to estimate the severity of ongoing problems [28]. Lebanon, a country suffering not only the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also of a devastating explosion and economic, social, and political crises. Therefore, it is ever more important to seek ways to improve the physical and mental health of a population experiencing great adversity. However, to be able to intervene in a specific and successful way at various levels, it is it is important to validate a tool for health care professionals living in the Arabic speaking countries and specifically in Lebanon to assess cyberchondria. Since the syndrome is motivated by concern about prospective health disorders or symptoms, the perceived severity of a specific circumstance may vary depending on cultural background and the current country situation. Both individual characteristics and contextual circumstances naturally influence assessment and coping strategies. Stressor evaluations are generally associated with higher overall levels of stress and its mental health correlates, such as depression and anxiety, as being more severe or frightening [29]. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the CSS scale has not been translated into Arabic, therefore, our objective was to assess the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the CSS (CSS-12-Ar) in terms of number of factors and internal consistency, as well as its validity among a sample of Lebanese adults. We expect that the scale will show four factors (H1), will have a good internal consistency (H2), and will be positively correlated with mental health issues (obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety and stress) (H3); in fact, positive associations have been stated between cyberchondria and health anxiety [14, 15], depression, anxiety and stress [13].

Methods

Participants

A total of 449 adults agreed to enroll in this study. The mean age of the sample was 24.34 ± 8.22 years, with 70.6% females. The mean cyberchondria severity score was 15.91 ± 9.64. Table 1 includes more details about the sample.

Table 1 Sociodemographic and other characteristics of the participants (N = 449)
Full size table

Study design

This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2021) through an online questionnaire. The total amount of participants was 449 individuals. A snowball sampling method was used to collect participants from all Lebanese governorates (Beirut, Bekaa, Mount Lebanon, South Lebanon and North Lebanon). The survey was completely anonymous and was distributed via the Whatsapp social application. Individuals above the age of 18 and residents of Lebanon were included [30].

Minimal sample size calculation

A minimal sample of 240 participants was deemed necessary to validate the CSS-12 scale, based on 20 participants per 1 scale item [31].

Questionnaire

The language of the questionnaire was Arabic, the official language of Lebanon. The questionnaire consisted of a sociodemographic section and different scales:

Sociodemographic section

Information about age, educational level, marital status, number of children, household crowding index (according to the number of rooms in the house excluding bathroom(s) and kitchen relative to the number of residents [32]) was collected.

Cyberchondria severity scale (CSS)

The CSS in a brief 12-item version assessed compulsion, distress, excessiveness and reassurance, without the mistrust of medical professional dimension [33]. The forward and backward translation method was applied to the CSS-12 scale following international guidelines [34]. It was translated from English to Arabic by a clinical psychologist, which was verified by a professional medical writer. Another clinical psychologist who is fluent in Arabic backward translated the scale from Arabic to English (Appendix 1). The backward-translated questionnaire was matched by the study’s principal investigator in order to detect inconsistencies and solve discrepancies between the two versions. A pilot study was conducted on 30 persons before the start of the official data collection to make sure all questions are well understood; no changes were done consequently.

The CSS-12 items are scored on a Likert-type scale ranging from “1 = never” to “5 = always”. Higher scores reflected higher cyberchondria. Four factors derive from this scale: Excessiveness, distress, reassurance and compulsion. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the four subscales in this study were as follows: 0.80, 0.77, 0.81 and 0.76 respectively. Permission to use the scale was obtained from Dr Eoin McElroy.

We used the Lebanese Anxiety Scale (LAS-10) to assess the CSS-12 convergent validity since spending more time on the internet searching for health information (i.e. cyberchondria) is associated with higher anxiety according to previous findings [25]. The LAS-10 evaluates anxiety among Lebanese adults [35] and adolescents [36]. It consists of 1- items rated differently: items 1 to 7 are scored from “0 = not present” to “4 = very severe” and items 8 to 10 are scored from “1 = never or almost never” to “4 = almost always” [35]. Higher scores reflect higher anxiety The Cronbach’s alpha values in the original study was 0.86 and 0.93 in the current one.

Beirut distress scale

The BDS-10 [37] assesses the level of distress among Lebanese adults. Items are rated from “0 = not at all” to “3 = all of the times”. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. The Cronbach’s alpha values in the original and current study were 0.90 and 0.89 respectively.

Yale brown obsession compulsion scale (YBOCS)

The YBOCS assesses the severity of OCD. It includes 10 items rated from 0 to 4 indicating no symptoms to extreme symptoms. Higher scores reflected more severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms [5]. The Arabic version of this scale has been previously used in a previous project [38]. The Cronbach’s alpha values in the original and current study were 0.89 and 0.86 respectively.

We used the YBOCS and BDS-10 scales to assess divergent validity, since previous research emphasized the manifestation of obsessive-compulsive components in cyberchondria [16, 39] and since higher distress may be one of the features associated with a form of behavioral addiction [40].

Statistical analysis

No missing data was found in the database as all questions were required in the Google form. The Mplus v. 7.2 was used to conduct confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) of the CSS-12. Multiple indices of goodness-of-fit were described: the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) (close fit are considered for values < 0.08) and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) (acceptable values are ≥ 0.90) [41]. We used maximum likelihood estimation with robust means and standard errors. evidence of convergent validity was assessed in this subsample using the average variance extracted (AVE), with values of ≥ 0.50 considered adequate [42]. To evaluate measurement invariance across gender, we conducted higher-order multiple group confirmatory analysis. The analysis was carried out in lavaan [43]. Three models were assessed: configural (i.e., without constraints); metric (i.e., with constraint factor loadings), and scalar (i.e., with constraint item intercepts). The model was considered as invariant at configural level if RMSEA and CFI values were acceptable as outlined above. The model was considered invariant at the metric and scalar levels if the difference in subsequent models did not exceeded 0.015 in RMSEA and 0.010 in CFI [44].

The statistical analysis was conducted on the SPSS software version 25. Reliability was checked using Cronbach’s alpha for all scales and subscales. The sample was normally distributed as verified by the skewness and kurtosis of the CSS score, which varied between − 1 and + 1 [45]. These conditions consolidate the assumptions of normality in samples larger than 300 [46]. Pearson correlation test was used to correlate two continuous variables. The Student t test was used to compare the cyberchondria score between genders. Significance was set at a p < 0.05.

Results

Factor validity- hypothesis 1

Since the correlations between the four-factor model were very high (r > 0.8), we ran the higher-order CFA in which all first-order latent variables were loading a general factor. The analyzed model was well-fitted to the data χ2(50) = 173.34; p < 0.001; CFI = 0.926; RMSEA = 0.074 [0.062, 0.086]. Standardized factor loadings of this model are summarized in Fig. 1. The AVE was adequate = 0.51.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Standardized factor loadings of the four-factor model of the Arabic version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-12-Ar).

Full size image

Internal consistency- hypothesis 2

The Cronbach’s alpha values were good for the total score (0.92), as well as for excessiveness (0.80), distress (0.77), reassurance (0.81) and compulsion (0.76). The total item correlations varied between 0.63 and 0.78 (Table 2).

Table 2 Correlation between the total score and each item of the scale
Full size table

Convergent and concurrent validity- hypothesis 3

The CSS-12 score was positively associated with anxiety (r = 0.10; p = 0.003) (convergent validity), OCD (r = 0.11; p = 0.016) and stress (r = 0.35; p < 0.001) (concurrent validity).

Comparison between gender

The results of the measurement invariance testing are presented in Table 3. The results provided evidence of full scalar invariance across gender. The comparison of latent mean scores revealed no significant differences across gender, in either the cyberchondria total score or its facets. Similarly, we also observed no significant differences when analyzing mean scores of cyberchondria total score between females (M = 16.21, SD = 9.89) and males (M = 15.20, SD = 9.01) in the total sample, t(447) = -1.01, p = 0.315.

Table 3 Measurement Invariance across Gender
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the Arabic version is the first validation of the CSS-12 in a language other than English. In terms of dimension assessment, the higher-order factor model showed acceptable fit indices. Although the original version showed four factors, the latent correlations between those factors turned out to be very high in our study (r > 0.8), suggesting that these factors almost measure the same component, with limited utility in practice in differentiating them from each other. Previous research also encountered such heightened latent correlations and attempted to account for them through the introduction of a bifactor [18]. Such approach, however, seldom solves the problem as the bifactor is most frequently accounting for noise variance representing implausible response patterns [47]. Furthermore, bifactor model frequently provides better fit to the data even if an a priori non-bifactor structure is known [48]. Thus, the proposed higher-order model highlights that all of the four factors have some psychological meaning, therefore, the scale could be interpreted in terms of a general score. Thus, the first hypothesis was verified.

The internal consistency of the CSS-12-Ar was very good for the total scale and each factor alone. The alpha value was higher in the Arabic version for the total scale and factor 4, but lower for Factors 1, 2 and 3 compared to the English version [33]. All values were above the commonly suggested threshold of 0.70 [49, 50]. In addition, the total-item correlations were moderate to large, therefore, we can consider that we verified the second hypothesis as well.

The CSS-12-Ar total score was positively correlated with anxiety, in line with previous findings [33]. Cyberchondria is by definition an anxiety resulting from online search about health information [11, 12]; it was strongly associated with health anxiety in the original paper (r = 0.53) but moderately with anxiety in general (r = 0.3) as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) [33]. Our results showed that it was weakly associated with the LAS score, making our results seem logical and expected. Furthermore, our results showed that higher cyberchondria was significantly associated with more distress and OCD, in line with previous research [51, 52]. We need to note that this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period that is associated with more mental health issues [53]. Consequently, the third hypothesis regarding both convergent and divergent validity was also verified.

Clinical implications

With the increasing use of the internet in Lebanon as in the world, access to health information is gradually increasing; therefore, it has become compelling to be aware of the potential health threats of cyberchondria and its evaluation tools. As a result, the current findings will help researchers develop measures to mitigate the harmful effects of cyberchondria, implement policies, and raise awareness about cyberchondria, particularly among at-risk individuals. As a result, future efforts may concentrate on improving systems for effective monitoring of internal discomfort and increasing ways to assist individuals in gaining a sense of personal control.

Limitations

Symptoms were self-report (not evaluated by a healthcare professional) and thus are subjective. In addition, recall bias might be present, which may have led to an overestimation of the answers given to some questions. Participants may have misunderstood some of the questions, which is a source of information bias. Additionally, a main reason for selection bias is the refusal rate and the fact that the sample was recruited via the snowball technique. In addition, most participants were females, single, with a university level of education, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Confounding bias might be present since some information about participants’ occupation and mental health disorders were not assessed. Content validity of the instrument and test–retest reliability of scale were not conducted. Research on different study groups (e.g., clinical or community-based sample) and taking this study limitations into consideration, are needed.

Conclusion

Our goal in this study was to provide evidence of validity of the CSS-12-Ar, which was done by inspection of its factor, convergent, and divergent validity as well as evaluating its internal consistency. All postulated hypotheses were verified by our database. Consequently, researchers and clinicians can take advantage of the CSS-12-Ar to assess cyberchondria levels in Lebanon.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are not publicly available due the restrictions from the ethics committee (data are owned by a third-party organization). The dataset supporting the conclusions is available upon request to the corresponding author (SH).

References

  1. Poll H. Cyberchondriacs” on the rise? Those who go online for healthcare information continues to increase. 2010.

  2. Abanmy NO, Al-Quait NA, Alami AH, Al-Juhani MH, Al-Aqeel S. The utilization of arabic online drug information among adults in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2012;20(4):317–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2012.07.001. PubMed PMID: 23960806; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3744981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Huberty J, Dinkel D, Beets MW, Coleman J. Describing the use of the internet for health, physical activity, and nutrition information in pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1363–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy. 2008;88(1):130–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leykin Y, Muñoz RF, Contreras O. Are consumers of internet health information cyberchondriacs? Characteristics of 24,965 users of a depression screening site. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(1):71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McManus F, Leung C, Muse K, Williams JMG. Understanding ‘cyberchondria’: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of the purpose, methods and impact of seeking health information online for those with health anxiety. Cogn Behav Therapist. 2014;7.

  7. Lauckner C, Hsieh G, editors. The presentation of health-related search results and its impact on negative emotional outcomes. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 2013.

  8. Muse K, McManus F, Leung C, Meghreblian B, Williams JMG. Cyberchondriasis: fact or fiction? A preliminary examination of the relationship between health anxiety and searching for health information on the internet. J Anxiety Disord. 2012;26(1):189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Norr AM, Capron DW, Schmidt NB. Medical information seeking: impact on risk for anxiety psychopathology. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014;45(3):402–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Starcevic V, Berle D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related internet use. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13(2):205–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White RW, Horvitz E. Cyberchondria: studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search. ACM Trans Inform Syst (TOIS). 2009;27(4):1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Starcevic V. Cyberchondria: challenges of problematic online searches for health-related information. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(3):129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McElroy E, Shevlin M. The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS). J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28(2):259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fergus TA. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): an examination of structure and relations with health anxiety in a community sample. J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28(6):504–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Norr AM, Allan NP, Boffa JW, Raines AM, Schmidt NB. Validation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): replication and extension with bifactor modeling. J Anxiety Disord. 2015;31:58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fergus TA. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): an examination of structure and relations with health anxiety in a community sample. J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28(6):504–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.006. PubMed PMID: 24956357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): german validation and development of a short form. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(5):595–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McElroy E, Kearney M, Touhey J, Evans J, Cooke Y, Shevlin M. The CSS-12: development and validation of a short-form version of the cyberchondria severity scale. Cyberpsychology Behav Social Netw. 2019;22(5):330–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marino C, Fergus TA, Vieno A, Bottesi G, Ghisi M, Spada MM. Testing the italian version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale and a metacognitive model of cyberchondria. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020;27(4):581–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2444. PubMed PMID: 32167214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uzun SU, Zencir M. Reliability and validity study of the turkish version of cyberchondria severity scale. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(1):65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bajcar B, Babiak J, Olchowska-Kotala A. Cyberchondria and its measurement. The polish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale CSS-PL. Pol Psychiatry. 2019;53(1):49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva FGd, Andrade R, Silva I, Cardoso A. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale for brazilian portuguese. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2016;38:90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rostovtseva N. 08-VALIDATION OF THE RUSSIAN VERSION OF THE CYBERCHONDRIA SEVERITY SCALE2017.

  24. Berkanovic E. The effect of inadequate language translation on Hispanics’ responses to health surveys. Am J Public Health. 1980;70(12):1273–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Laato S, Islam AN, Islam MN, Whelan E. What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur J Inform Syst. 2020;29(3):288–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis T. Seeking health information on the internet: Lifestyle choice or bad attack of cyberchondria? Media. Cult Soc. 2006;28(4):521–39.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allcott H, Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Economic Perspect. 2017;31(2):211–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kata A. A postmodern Pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine. 2010;28(7):1709–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Whitehead BR. COVID-19 as a Stressor: pandemic expectations, perceived stress, and negative affect in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(2):e59–e64. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa153. PubMed PMID: 32886773; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7499769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarabay C, Bitar Z, Akel M, Hallit S, Obeid S, Soufia M. Cyberchondria severity and quality of life among Lebanese adults: the moderating effect of emotions. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2023;25(2):22m03252. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.22m03252.

  31. Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test. 2005;5(2):159–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Melki IS, Beydoun HA, Khogali M, Tamim H, Yunis KA. National Collaborative Perinatal neonatal N. Household crowding index: a correlate of socioeconomic status and inter-pregnancy spacing in an urban setting. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(6):476–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.012690. PubMed PMID: 15143115; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1732777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. McElroy E, Kearney M, Touhey J, Evans J, Cooke Y, Shevlin M. The CSS-12: development and validation of a short-form version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(5):330–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0624. PubMed PMID: 31013440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. PubMed PMID: 11124735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hallit S, Obeid S, Haddad C, Hallit R, Akel M, Haddad G, et al. Construction of the lebanese anxiety scale (LAS-10): a new scale to assess anxiety in adult patients. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020;24(3):270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Merhy G, Azzi V, Salameh P, Obeid S, Hallit S. Anxiety among lebanese adolescents: scale validation and correlates. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02763-4. PubMed PMID: 34158020; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8218523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Malaeb D, Farchakh Y, Haddad C, Sacre H, Obeid S, Hallit S et al. Validation of the Beirut Distress Scale (BDS-10), a short version of BDS-22, to assess psychological distress among the Lebanese Population. Perspect Psych Care. 2021.

  38. Wehbe J, Haddad C, Obeid S, Hallit S, Haddad G. Prevalence of obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with schizophrenia and outcome on positive and negative symptoms, cognition, and quality of life. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019;207(4):239–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McElroy E, Shevlin M. The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS). J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28(2):259–65. PubMed PMID: 24508033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kardefelt-Winther D, Heeren A, Schimmenti A, van Rooij A, Maurage P, Carras M, et al. How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? Addiction. 2017;112(10):1709–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13763. PubMed PMID: 28198052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5557689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press; 2013.

  42. Malhotra N, Dash S. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (; Pearson, Ed.). Delhi; 2011.

  43. Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 2007;14(3):464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. saGe publications; 2017.

  46. Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67–72. ACA_157_18. PubMed PMID: 30648682; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6350423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Reise SP, Kim DS, Mansolf M, Widaman KF. Is the Bifactor Model a better model or is it just better at modeling implausible responses? Application of Iteratively reweighted least squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Multivar Behav Res. 2016;51(6):818–38. PubMed PMID: 27834509; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5312782.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Greene AL, Eaton NR, Li K, Forbes MK, Krueger RF, Markon KE, et al. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019;128(7):740–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000434. PubMed PMID: 31318246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Furr RM. Psychometrics: an introduction. SAGE publications; 2021.

  50. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vismara M, Caricasole V, Starcevic V, Cinosi E, Dell’Osso B, Martinotti G, et al. Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence. Compr Psychiatry. 2020;99:152167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152167. PubMed PMID: 32146315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bajcar B, Babiak J, Olchowska-Kotala A. Cyberchondria and its measurement. The polish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale CSS-PL. Psychiatr Pol. 2019;53(1):49–60. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/81799. PubMed PMID: 31008464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. El Othman R, Touma E, El Othman R, Haddad C, Hallit R, Obeid S, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021;25(2):152–63. PubMed PMID: 33587678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants as well as Dr Marwan Akel for his help in the data collection.

Funding

The work of Radosław Rogoza was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, P.O. Box 446, Jounieh, Lebanon

    Souheil Hallit, Carl Abi Semaan & Vanessa Azzi

  2. Research Department, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon

    Souheil Hallit

  3. Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

    Souheil Hallit

  4. University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Radosław Rogoza

  5. Social Innovation Chair, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain

    Radosław Rogoza

  6. Social and Education Sciences Department, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon

    Toni Sawma & Sahar Obeid

Authors
  1. Souheil Hallit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Radosław Rogoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carl Abi Semaan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vanessa Azzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toni Sawma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sahar Obeid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SO and SH designed the study; SH and SO drafted the manuscript; SH and RR carried out the analysis and interpreted the results; CAS and TS revised the paper for intellectual content; all authors reviewed the final manuscript and gave their consent.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souheil Hallit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross Ethics and Research Committee approved this study protocol (HPC-027-2021). A written informed consent was considered obtained from each participant when submitting the online form. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS-12-Ar)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hallit, S., Rogoza, R., Abi Semaan, C. et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the cyberchondria severity scale 12 items (CSS-12-Ar) among a sample of Lebanese adults. BMC Psychiatry 23, 618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05123-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05123-x

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us