Skip to main content

Minority stress, social support and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students in China: a moderated mediation analysis



The existing body of research exploring minority stressors and their impact on the mental health of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) students in China remains limited in scope and often restricted to specific geographic regions..


A combination of snowball and targeted sampling strategies was used to recruit lesbian, gay and bisexual students (N = 1,393) for a cross-sectional, online survey in China. Participants (Mage = 20.00 years; 60.23% assigned male at birth) were tasked with completing a comprehensive questionnaire designed to capture various dimensions, including gender expression, minority stressors (e.g., school bullying, internalized homophobia), social psychological resources (e.g., perceived social support), and mental health-related outcomes (e.g., depression, anxious and stress). Our analytical approach involved hierarchical multiple regression analyses, mediation and moderated mediation modeling to elucidate the intricate interplay among these factors.


Our findings shed light on the pronounced mental health disparities afflicting LGB college students in China, with notable prevalence rates of depression (48.1%), anxiety (57.1%), and stress (37.5%). A significant positive correlation was observed between experiences of school-based victimization and internalized homophobia, which, in turn, exhibited a direct association with affective symptoms.School bullying was positive with internalized homophobia, which was positively associated with affective symptoms.In addition to unveiling the indirect effects of school bullying on affective symptoms, our study identified direct links in this complex relationship. Notably, the availability of social support emerged as a pivotal factor, serving as a moderator within the mediation model by mitigating the path from school-based victimization bullying to internalized homophobia (β = -0.077, P = 0.040).


This study underscores the pervasive and concerning mental health disparities experienced by LGB college students in China. In response, institutions of higher learning should intensify anti-bullying initiatives tailored to LGB students and implement comprehensive gender education programs. Moreover, concerted efforts should be directed at enhancing the accessibility of social support resources for LGB college students, with the aim of cultivating and sustaining favorable psychological well-being.

Peer Review reports


In recent decades, research attention has increasingly turned toward the mental well-being of sexual minorities [1]. Studies have shown that, comparedto heterosexual individuals, lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB) individuals face atwo-fold greater risk of experiencing mood and anxiety disorders [2]. However, much of the research on LGB stress and coping in China, as in other countries, has predominantly focused on adults [3], with limited attention given to student populations.

Minority stress theory

The conceptual framework known as Minority stress theory provides valuable insights into understanding the mental health disparity by sexual minorities. This theory posits that sexual minorities are at an elevated risk of psychological distress due to their encounters with external prejudice events, discrimination and internal stress processes such as internalized homophobia and concealment [4, 5]. A substantial body of evidence consistently supports this theory within the LGB community, underscoring how experiences like discrimination, victimization, bullying, concealment, and internalized homophobia contribute to psychological distress and stress-related conditions, including suicidal ideation [6, 7]. Notably, LGB individuals are particularly susceptible to daily social stress stemming from discrimination based on their sexual orientation [8]. The model also suggests that distal stressors, such as school bullying, can be internalized into the proximal stressors, like internalized homophobia [9]. Furthermore, minority stress model posits that the relationship between stressors related to sexual and gender minority statusand mental health outcomes may be moderated by social support and coping strategies [5]. Numerous studies have found links between social support and the health of LGBT individuals [10]. While social support is often seen as an interpersonal phenomenon, research has revealed both direct and stress-buffering effects on mental health [10].

Current situation of China

However, much of this evidence has been established primarily in Western countries, which raises questions about the universal applicability of this theory in understanding and addressing mental health challenges among LGB individuals globally. In the context of China, there is a relative scarcity of literature on minority stress theory, particularly concerning Chinese LGB students. Moreover, there has been limited investigation into school bullying and its association with mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms [3, 11].

China places significant emphasis on social bonds and interdependent relationships within society [1]. Schools, as environment for socialization, play a critical role in shaping students' psychosocial well-being [12]. The college years, in particular, represent a high-risk period for the development of mental health concerns among all students [13]. Unfortunately, schools can sometimes become hostile environments, especially for students who are more likely to experience passivity. LGB students may face additional pressures compared to their heterosexual counterparts, including the heightened risk of experiencing school bullying, which significantly elevates their susceptibility to poor mental health outcomes [14, 15]. Identifying as a sexual minority can increase a person's chances of suffering from bullying at school [16]. In China, where non-heterosexuality remains stigmatized and less discussed [17], social disapproval of sexual identity often compels many LGB individuals to conceal their sexual orientation [3]. UNESCO (2013) defines homophobia as the underlying attitude that fuels homophobic bullying and encompasses the fear of, rejection of, or aversion to gender and sexual minority [16]. The intersection of sexual prejudice and cultural norms in China may further expose LGB students to minority stress, increasing their vulnerability to mental health challenges.

The current study

This study endeavors to address several gaps in the current body of literature concerning school bullying, internalized homophobia, social support, and mental health within the context of Chinese LGB students. Our research aims to explore affective symptoms among LGB college students in China and examine how minority stress factors influence their mental health. To achieve this, we employ hierarchical multiple regression analyses and structural equation model (SEM).



Data collection for this study was conducted through an Internet-based survey. We employed a combination of snowball and targeted sampling methods to recruit participants. A thematic poster containing questionnaire links was created and disseminated through the “WeChat” and “QQ group of Rainbow Wall” – popular online communities among LGBT students. This recruitment strategy spanned 142 colleges and universities, encompassing 31 provinces in China.

Participants were encouraged to forward the study information to potentially eligible individuals and groups. Recognizing the challenges of recruiting bisexual women and LGB individuals, we specifically targeted advertising efforts towards platforms such as “The L” and “Lesfun” APP, which are known for their relevance to these groups.

Prior to questionnaire completion, participants were directed to a web-based information statement outlining the study's purpose: “to gain a better understanding of the health status of lesbian, gay, and bisexual.” This statement also delineated the participation criteria (college student; self-identified as LGB; residing in China), associated risks and benefits, and a confidentiality agreement. Participants who consented to participate proceeded to completed the questionnaire online using the “wenjuanxing” platform, with each participant receiving a $1 incentive.


A total of 1,678 individuals participated in the survey.After excluding those who did not meet the inclusion criteria (including none of the main study variables (n = 1), non-college students (n = 7), individuals younger than 15 (n = 5), duplicate Internet Protocol addresses (n = 2), those identitying as straight and transgender (n = 28), and respondents providing fraudulent data on the scales (n = 131)), 1,504 participants were retained.

To identify and address multivariate outliers, the Mahalanobis distance was calculated. Outliers were removed for the following variables: school bullying (42 cases), mental health (46 cases), social support (22 cases), and internalized homophobia (1 cases). In total, 111 cases were identified as multivariate outliers and were excluded from subsequent analyses, resulting in a final analytical sample of 1,393 participants.

The age of participants ranged from 15 to 31 years, with a median age of 20.00 years old (interquartile range: 19.00–21.00). Among the participants, 60.23% were assigned male at birth, while 20.4% identified as lesbian, 48.4% as gay, and 31.2% as bisexual. Additionally, 38.4% resided in rural area, and 9.2% held a master's degree or higher. Further demographics details for the entire sample and by gender are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographics of the participants


The survey encompassed questions covering demographics information, school bullying, internalized homophobia, social-psychological resources, and mental health. The selected measures are widely recognized in the field.

Demographics: Demographic data collected included age, sex, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, education, and area of residence.

LGB victimization

Internalized homophobia: Measured using the Internalized Homophobia Scale [18], an empirically validated 11-item self-administered scale (e.g., “If I were a heterosexual, I would be happier”). Participants rated the frequency of experienceing such thoughts and feelings on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The Cronbach’s alpha for this scale in the current study was 0.82.

School bullying: Assessed using the Supporting LGBT lives subscale of the school bullying [19], consists of 8 items (e.g., “Isolate you because you are or think you are a member of LGBT”). Items were scored on a scale from 1 (no) to 5 (very frequent), with higher scores indicating more frequent experiences of school bullying. The Cronbach’s alpha for this scale in the current study was 0.86.

Social–psychological resources

Social support: Assessed using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) [20], which comprises 12-item assessing subjective social support from family, friends, and significant others (e.g., “My friends really try to help me”). Responses were rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree). In the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha for family, friends, and significant others were 0.87, 0.92, 0.91, respectively.

Mental health problems

Depression, Anxiety, and Stress: Measured using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) (simplified Chinese version) [21], a 21-item self-report measure of depression, anxiety, and stress (e.g., “I felt my life had no meaning whatsoever.”). Each subscale consists of 7 items, with responses rated on a 4-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points, 0 = “Did not apply to me at all”, 1 = “Applied to me to some degree, or some of the time”, 2 = “Applied to me to a considerable degree or a good part of the time”, and 3 = “Applied to me very much or most of the time”). Severity ratings for each subscale were defined as follows: Depressive Symptoms (normal 0–4, mild 5–6, moderate 7–10, severe 11–13, extremely severe 14 +), Anxiety Symptoms (normal 0–3, mild 4–5, moderate 6–7, severe 8–9, extremely severe 10 +), and General Stress (normal 0–7, mild 8–9, moderate 10–12, severe 13–16, extremely severe 17 +). Higher scores indicated higher levels of anxiety, depression, or stress. The scale has good face validity and test–retest reliability [22, 23]. The Cronbach’s alphas for depressive, anxiety, and stress subscales in this study were 0.87, 0.82, and 0.84, respectively.

Analytic plan

Descriptive statistics were employed to characterize the demographics and affective symptoms (depression, anxiety, and stress) for the entire sample and by gender. Chi-square tests were used to compare male and female individuals regarding demographics and affective symptoms. Independent-sample t-tests were conducted to explore gender-based differences in minority stress variables (internalized homophobia, school bullying, and social support).

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of minority stress on affective symptoms, controlling for other variables affecting affective symptoms. These included tobacco use, suicide attempts, self-rated esteem, self-rated health, and demographic factors. Prior to running multiple regressions, the assumptions required for regression analysis were assessed and confirmed to be met without necessitating data adjustments.

Structural equation model (SEM) was employed to examine whether perceived social support moderate the mediated relationships between school bullying with affective symptoms via internalized homophobia. SEM enables the simultaneous testing of relationships between all variables and underlying constructs. This approach offers several advantages, including the identification of direct and indirect effects, and the corresponding standard errors and obtain indices of overall model fit. Full-information maximum-likelihood estimation analyses ware used to retain as much data as possible [24].

There are various difficulties in using latent variables in a structural equation analysis of interactions. To find the impacts of interactions, fixed factor coefficients and error variances must first be subjected to nonlinear constraints. Even though every variable that makes up the interaction term has a normal distribution, it can still be challenging to claim that the indicators of the interaction term do as well. In an effort to overcome these limitations, Ping's two-step method (1996), which is less dependent on the use of nonlinear constraints, was used in this study to confirm the impact of interactions [25].

The data in this study were at the ordinal level; therefore, the SEM assumption of multivariate normality was not possible. Additionally, the Mardia’s coefficients for multivariate kurtosis in each model was > 3, indicating significant multivariate non-normality in the data. As a result, the Bollen–Stine bootstrap P procedure was used to adjust model fit and parameter estimates to accommodate the lack of multivariate normality [26, 27].

Model fit to the sample data was evaluated through a two-step procedure [28]. First, a measurement model was tested with all relevant paths left free to vary. Then, the hypothesized structural path model was examined, wherein all hypothesized paths shown in Fig. 1 were estimated freely. Modification indices were inspected for significant areas of model misfit, and the model was adjusted accordingly and rerun. Model fit was assessed using goodness of fit index (GFI), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA). Indicators of acceptable model fit are considered to be a GFI, CFI and TLI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.06 [29, 30]. The analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 22) and Amos (Version 26). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Path model and standardized path coefficients for prediction of health outcomes

*P < 0.05. ** P < 0.01. *** P < 0.001

Patient and public involvement

The design and conduct of this study were informed through discussion with the LGBT members. Five LGBT members were part of the study steering group and advised on a lay summary of our study findings.


Preliminary analyses

Significant differences were observed between male and female individuals in various aspects, including sexual orientation (χ2 = 132.545, P < 0.001), urban or rural residence (χ2 = 58.187, P < 0.001), education (χ2 = 16.654, P = 0.002), major (χ2 = 55.646, P < 0.001), parents' marital status, mother's and father's education level, monthly expenses, tobacco use, alcohol use, and suicide attempts (P < 0.025, see Table 1). Among females, a significantly higher proportion identified as bisexual, resided in urban areas, be freshmen, major in humanities and social sciences, have parents with unstable marital status, and had higher educated mothers and fathers compared to their male counterparts. Additionally, a higher proportion of females reported monthly expenses exceeding RMB 2000, as well as higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use, and no suicide attempts. Independent samples t-tests indicated that females had significantly lower levels of school bullying (t = 8.320, P < 0.001) and internalized homophobia (t = 15.700, P = 0.003), as well as higher levels of family support (t = -1.960, P = 0.009). Table 2 displays the intercorrelations among minority stress and mental health variables.

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and intercorrelations of the variables

Gender disparities in affective symptoms

Around half of the LGB students (48.1%) met the criteria for depression symptoms, with 14.9% classified as mild, 19.1% as moderate, 7.5% as severe, and 6.6% as extremely severe. For anxiety symptoms, the prevalence was 57.1%, with 11.3% mild, 21.6% moderate, 10.6% severe, and 13.6% extremely severe. Regarding stress symptoms, 37.5% met the criteria, with 14.1% mild, 14.7% moderate, 7.4% severe, and 1.3% extremely severe.

Table 1 demonstrates that females were more likely to meet the criteria for depression symptoms than male, as indicated by both in χ2-tests (χ2 = 11.835, P = 0.019) and t-tests (t = -1.970, P < 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between genders in terms of anxiety and stress symptoms.

Associations of sexual minority stress and social support with mental health

Table 3 presents the results of regression models examining the associations between social support, sexual minority stress, and mental health. After adjusting for demographics and health-related behaviors, social support from significant others was negatively related to depressive symptoms (β = -0.106, P = 0.003) and stress symptoms (β = -0.095, P = 0.014). However, it was not significantly associated with anxiety symptoms (β = 0.023, P = 0.537). Social support from family was negatively related to depressive symptoms (β = -0.182, P < 0.001), anxiety symptoms (β = -0.104, P < 0.001), and stress symptoms (β = -0.157, P < 0.001). Social support from friends was negatively related to anxiety symptoms (β = -0.131, P = 0.001), but not significantly associated with depressive symptoms (β = -0.053, P = 0.157) or stress symptoms (β = 0.008, P = 0.840). School bullying was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms (β = 0.103, P < 0.001), anxiety symptoms (β = 0.123, P < 0.001), and stress symptoms (β = 0.104, P < 0.001). Internalized homophobia was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms (β = 0.098, P < 0.001), anxiety symptoms (β = 0.113, P < 0.001), and stress symptoms (β = 0.139, P < 0.001).

Table 3 Effect of demographics, health-related behavior, and minority Stress on depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and stress symptoms

Confirmatory factor analysis

Latent variables were constructed for social support, encompassing subjective social support from family, friends, and significant others, and for mental health, comprising depression, anxiety, and stress. The latent factors were allowed to freely correlate in the measurement model. The model demonstrated an acceptable fit: Bollen-Stine χ2(1262) = 1523.781, P < 0.05, GFI = 0.963, CFI = 0.0993, TLI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.012. Factor loadings for the indicators of each latent variable exceeded 0.627 and were all statistically significant (all Ps < 0.001). Moreover, the correlations among social support, school bullying, internalized homophobia, and mental health within the measurement model were statistically significant (all Ps < 0.001).

A mediation model of internalized homophobia between school bullying and mental health

SEM also demonstrated an acceptable model fit: Bollen-Stine χ2(1068) = 899.05, P < 0.05, GFI = 0.967, CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.013. The final model revealed that school bullying was positively associated with internalized homophobia. Additionally, both school bullying and internalized homophobia were directly associated with mental health problems (Fig. 1).

Using bias-corrected bootstrapping with 5000 samples for tests of direct and indirect effects, school bullying and internalized homophobia were significantly directly (β = 0.225, P < 0.001) and indirectly associated with mental health (β = 0.039, P < 0.001), suggesting partial mediation.

To assess the stability of the structural equation model, a multi-group structural equation model was employed to analyze whether the model differed among various groups, such as gender, sexual orientation, age, urban or rural residence, and tobacco use. The results indicated that the model exhibited a certain degree of stability among different groups (results not presented).

Social support will moderate the strength of the mediated relationships between school bullying with affective symptoms via internalized homophobia

To examine whether social support moderated the strength of the mediated relationships between school bullying and affective symptoms via internalized homophobia, an interaction term was created using Ping’s (1996) two-step approach. A moderated mediation model was constructed, and the model also demonstrated an acceptable fit: Bollen-Stine χ2(1068) = 736.943, P < 0.05, GFI = 0.968, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.014.

As shown in Fig. 2, only the path where the interaction term moves toward internalized homophobia was found significant (β = -0.077, P = 0.040). The path from school bullying toward internalized homophobia was also significant (β = 0.172, P < 0.001). Regarding the path from the mediating variables toward affective symptoms—a dependent variable—the path from internalized homophobia toward affective symptoms was significant (β = 0.065, P = 0.023). Moreover, the direct path taken by school bullying leading to affective symptoms was significant (β = 0.153, P < 0.001). This implies that even after the main effect is controlled in the full measurement model that includes the interaction effect, internalized homophobia has a mediation effect between school bullying and affective symptoms. Table 4 provides the significance of the path coefficients of each variable.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mediated moderation path results for affective symptoms

*P < 0.05. ** P < 0.01. *** P < 0.001

Table 4 Moderated mediation paths' coefficients

Table 5 illustrated the conditional effects at incremental levels of social support, ranging from low levels to high levels of social support. Notably, simple slope tests indicated that the indirect effect of school bullying on affective symptoms through internalized homophobia was significant when social support was at low (β = 0.049, 95% CI 0.012–0.103) and moderate (β = 0.019, 95% CI 0.003–0.042) levels.

Table 5 Conditional indirect effect of school bullying on affective symptoms at special level of social support


LGB individuals face substantial health disparities [31], a reality also mirrored among LGB students [32, 33]. In our study, a diverse group of Chinese LGB undergraduates exhibited notably high levels of depression (48.1%), anxiety (57.1%), and stress (37.5%). However, it's essential to recognize that LGB students’ mental health may be influenced by their country of residence. Different nations have distinct culture orientations along the collectivistic-individualistic spectrum and diverse approaches to LGBTQ rights [34]. In China, psychological well-being is closely tied to the satisfaction of needs within the collective [1]. Consequently, the activation of social resources, like social support, can have a profound impact on mental health. While extensive national studies have documented adverse health outcomes among LGB individuals, there has been limited research among Chinese undergraduates. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to explore minority stressors and mental health (specifically, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms) in a large, national sample of Chinese LGB undergraduates. The research not only delves into the unique roles of school bullying and internalized homophobia but also incorporated a moderator, social support, into the stress-health model. It’s worth noting that previous discussions of minority stress have primarily focused, both theoretically and empirically, on its influence on mental health [31].

Our findings underscore the detrimental effects of school bullying and internalized homophobia on the lives of sexual and gender minority students, particularly in the context of psychological well-being [7, 32]. Those who experience rejection from friends or unfair treatment from family members, or even strangers, are at increased risk of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and stress [10]. These, in turn, can lead to reduced life satisfaction [35]. Importantly, social support from family and significant others was associated with lower levels of depression and stress symptoms [36]. Furthermore, social support from family and friends was linked to lower levels of anxiety symptoms. This is especially significant because LGB individuals face a heightened risk of affective symptoms due to discrimination, health issues, or the loss of a family member or close friend, all of which can generate stress for a student [37]. College students are in a transitional phase, balancing academic and professional pursuits, which is also a high-risk period for the development of mental health issues [13, 38]. This is the study to address the intersection of these identities and the resulting additive effects of unique forms of discrimination on mental health of LGB undergraduates. While this model cannot pinpoint the exact causes of mental health problems, it highlights that bullying and internalized homophobia are predictors of subsequent mental health disorders [7, 39] and are distressing in their own right. School bullying can leave victims feeling isolated and helpless, while internalized homophobia can lead to deep self-denial. Meyer [5] believed that internal sexual minority stress has the greatest and more direct impact on the mental health of sexual minorities. However, this study found that school bullying has a more substantial impact on mental health than internalized homophobia. LGB-based school bullying may have statistically overshadowed internalized homophobia with a larger standardized regression weight because LGB students can experience LGB-based school bullying from their own LGB students, in addition to discrimination based on sexual or gender identity they may experience from individuals inside and outside the LGB community [32]. Consequently, LGB students may feel compelled to conceal their sexual orientation in an effort to fit in, a strategy that, although protective in some instances, carries cognitive and behavioral burdens that result in serious psychological consequences, including depression and anxiety [1, 40].

Experiencing LGB-based school bullying has an additive effect on the social support experienced by undergraduates, which, in turn, impacts the mental health and quality of life of LGB students, and may even be associated with physical health problems in adulthood [15, 41]. Due to the sensitivity of sexual minorities, LGB college students may feel isolated or excluded when they experience sexual minority stress like school bullying and internalized homophobia. This can lead to perceive the availability of social support as lower than it actually is and result in an inaccurate subjective assessment of their level of social support from family, friends, and significant others [42]. This perception can significantly affect their mental health and perceived social support. Social support, both theoretically and empirically, is widely recognized as an essential factor in the well-being of LGB individuals [4, 43], helping them find or maintain meaning in life, especially in the face of oppression.

Consistent with the Psychological Mediation Framework [31], our findings provide supportive evidence for the indirect effect of distal minority stress experiences (school bullying) on affective symptoms (depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms) via internalized homophobia. This finding aligns with a study conducted among young gay men [44]. Moreover, social support was found to moderate the path between school bullying and internalized homophobia. This is to say, social support reduced the effect of school bullying on sexually internalized homophobia. In other words, individuals with both higher school bullying and lower social support were more likely to internalized homophobia [45]. This is significant because internalized homophobia, as a proximal stressor, occurs when individuals have negative feelings and homophobia attitudes towards themselves and others who are part of the sexual minority [5]. In Chinese culture, which is socially conservative and less tolerant of homosexuality [46], many people, including those who routinely provide support to friends, family members, and other in their daily lives, may hold prejudice views toward homosexuality. Perceived social support, seem as “emotional support”, is associated with successful coping in the face of stressors [47]. High social support may facilitate effective coping, such as dealing with school bullying, to maintain low levels of internalized homophobia. Interestingly, our findings did not reveal a moderating effect of social support in the relationship between internalized homophobia and affective symptoms [46, 48]. This could be due to the fact that the majority of respondents were enrolled in school and received “virtually” social support from their family members through long-distance contacts, which may have diminished the perceived strength of social support.

Additionally, research suggests that support from other LGB individuals may have a more substantial impact on mental health than support from heterosexual individuals [49]. As our findings indicate, interventions that encourage LGB individuals to actively utilize social resources may be especially beneficial.


The impact of LGB-based school bullying on internalized homophobia in LGB students, and thereby mental health, moderated by social support, is a potentially important area for intervention based on the findings. Schools must pay close attention to the minority stress experienced by LGB students and incorporate resource mobilization into interventions aimed at preventing and addressing mental health issues. Indeed, results indicate the relevance of psychosocial interventions that address minority stress and the environment, such as LGB-affirmative cognitive behavioral therapy. This therapy offers students the opportunities to learn coping strategies related to the stress of sexual minority status and has been shown to significantly reduces depressive and anxiety symptoms [50]. Additionally, cognitive-behavioral therapy like “Effective Skills to Empower Effective Men” have been successful in improves the mental and sexual health of Chinese young men who have sex with men (YMSM) [51]. Meanwhile, clinicians or school psychologists may choose to focus on helping LGB students reduce their negative self-perceptions and attitudes (i.e., internalized homophobia) and reevaluate their coping mechanisms for school bullying. Given the connection between minority stress, resources, and mental health, treatments that take the social environment into account may provide valuable insight for LGB students.

Furthermore, our study shows that social support plays a decreasingly moderating role in the indirect association between school bullying and internalized homophobia. Future psychological intervention should not only focus on the sexuality minority but also on colleges, family members, and friends. Colleges should promote anti-stigma, anti-discrimination, and anti-bullying messages more vigorously, offer multi-gender education, enhance social support for LGB students, assist them in coming to terms with their sexual orientation, reduce the likelihood of internalizing distal stress, and support their psychological well-being. Parents and friends should remain vigilant regarding college students' lifestyle choices and mental health. When students experience negative emotions, timely psychological counseling should be offered to address affective disorde. Implementing multifaceted interventions like these could ultimately help mitigate the mental health problems faced by students, including depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms.


While this study possesses several strengths, including a substantial sample size and the use of nationwide data from 142 colleges and universities in 31 provinces in China, it also has some notable limitations: 1. Self-Reported Data: The data used in this study relies on self-reported responses, which may be susceptible to participant misunderstanding or biased response. Participants might underreport or overreport certain experiences or emotions. 2. Internet-Based Survey: The survey was conducted online, which has both advantages and disadvantages. While it can enhance accessibility for hard-to-reach populations, such as those who conceal their sexuality, it's challenging to determine how many people viewed the recruitment materials or if there were systematic differences between participants and non-participants. 3. Sample Representativeness: It's important to acknowledge that the sample may not be fully representative of the entire population of LGB college students, primarily because many LGB individuals keep their sexual orientation secret. Thus, the exact number of LGB students in the population remains unknown. 4. Cross-Sectional Design: This study utilized cross-sectional data, which cannot establish causal relationships between minority stress, social support, and mental health. It provides valuable insights into associations but cannot determine the direction of causality.


In conclusion, this study highlights that LGB college students in China, especially those assigned female at birth, are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. We found that the link between school bullying and affective symptoms is partially mediated by internalized homophobia. Moreover, our results demonstrate that low social support exacerbates the impact of school bullying on internalized homophobia, subsequently increasing the risk of affective symptoms among LGB college students.. Effective strategies to improve the mental health status of LGB college students should involve collaborative efforts from society, educational institutions, and families.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated or analysed during the current study are not publicly available to maintain the privacy of the individuals’ identities. The dataset supporting the conclusions is available upon request to the corresponding author.



Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual


The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales


Structural equation modelling


  1. Chan RCH, Operario D, Mak WWS. Bisexual individuals are at greater risk of poor mental health than lesbians and gay men: The mediating role of sexual identity stress at multiple levels. J Affect Disord. 2019;2020(260):292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilman SE, Cochran SD, Mays VM, Hughes M, Ostrow D, Kessler RC. Risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals reporting same-sex sexual partners in the national comorbidity survey. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:933–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng L, Hart TA, Noor SW, Wen G. Stressors Based on Sexual Orientation and Mental Health Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals in China: Minority Stress and Perceived Pressure to Get Married. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49:1769–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun S, Pachankis JE, Li X, Operario D. Addressing Minority Stress and Mental Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in China. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17:35–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer IH. Prejudice, Social Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: Conceptual Issues and Research Evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:674–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutter M, Perrin PB. Discrimination, Mental Health, and Suicidal Ideation Among LGBTQ People of Color. J Couns Psychol. 2016;63:98–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaspal R, Lopes B, Rehman Z. A structural equation model for predicting depressive symptomatology in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic gay, lesbian and bisexual people in the UK. Psychol Sex. 2021;12:217–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fattoracci ESM, Revels-Macalinao M, Huynh Q-L. Greater Than the Sum of Racism and Heterosexism: Intersectional Microaggressions Toward Racial/Ethnic and Sexual Minority Group Members. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2021;27:176–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bostwick WB, Boyd CJ, Hughes TL, West B. Discrimination and Mental Health Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults in the United States. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2014;84:33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehavot K, Simoni JM. The Impact of Minority Stress on Mental Health and Substance Use Among Sexual Minority Women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79:159–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun S, Hoyt WT, Tarantino N, Pachankis JE, Whiteley L, Operario D, et al. Cultural Context Matters: Testing the Minority Stress Model Among Chinese Sexual Minority Men. J Couns Psychol. 2020;68:526–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sigfusdottir ID, Kristjansson AL, Thorlindsson T, Allegrante JP. Stress and adolescent well-being: The need for an interdisciplinary framework. Health Promot Int. 2017;32:1081–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Storrie K, Ahern K, Tuckett A. A systematic review: Students with mental health problems-A growing problem. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16:1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walls NE, Atteberry-Ash B, Kattari SK, Peitzmeier S, Kattari L, Langenderfer-Magruder L. Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Mental Health, and Bullying as Predictors of Partner Violence in a Representative Sample of Youth. J Adolesc Heal. 2019;64:86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zou C, Andersen JP, Blosnich JR. The Association Between Bullying and Physical Health Among Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Individuals. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2013;19:356–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Moyano N, Sánchez-Fuentes Mdel M. Homophobic bullying at schools: A systematic review of research, prevalence, school-related predictors and consequences. Aggress Violent Behav. 2020;53:101441.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suen YT, Chan RCH. A nationwide cross-sectional study of 15,611 lesbian, gay and bisexual people in China: Disclosure of sexual orientation and experiences of negative treatment in health care. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ren Z, Hood RW. Internalized Homophobia Scale for Gay Chinese Men: Conceptualization, Factor Structure, Reliability, and Associations With Hypothesized Correlates. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:1297–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. P, Mayock, A, Bryan, N C. Supporting LGBT lives: A study of the mental health and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Dublin: Gay and Lesbian Equality Network(GLEN) and BeLonGTo Youth Service; 2009.

  20. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cao C, Hu L, Xu TL, Liu QR, Koyanagi A, Yang L, et al. Prevalence, correlates and misperception of depression symptoms in the United States, NHANES 2015–2018. J Affect Disord. 2020;269:51–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang K, Shi HS, Geng FL, Zou LQ, Tan SP, Wang Y, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 in China. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:e88-100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu H, Xue R, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Rao J, Liu M, et al. Assessing anxiety, depression, and stress among inpatients with cancer. Oncol Transl Med. 2020;6:126–30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Enders CK, Mansolf M. Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data. Psychol Methods. 2018;1:76–93.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jr RP. Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychol Bull. 1996;II:166–75.

  26. Enders CK. An SAS macro for implementing the modified bollen-stine bootstrap for missing data: Implementing the bootstrap using existing structural equation modeling software. Struct Equ Model. 2005;12:620–41.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21:205–29.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:411–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iacobucci D. Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J Consum Psychol. 2010;20:90–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shi D, Maydeu-Olivares A. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2020;80:421–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hatzenbuehler ML. How Does Sexual Minority Stigma “Get Under the Skin”? A Psychological Mediation Framework. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:707–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Yu H, Yang Y, Li R, Wilson A, Wang S, et al. The victim-bully cycle of sexual minority school adolescents in China: Prevalence and the association of mood problems and coping strategies. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e179.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bourdon JL, Liadis A, Tingle KM, Saunders TR. Trends in mental health service utilization among LGB+ college students. J Am Coll Heal. 2021;69:750–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ummak E, Toplu-Demirtaş E, Pope AL, Moe J. The influence of internalized heterosexism on life satisfaction: comparing sexual minority women in Belgium and Turkey. Curr Psychol. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu X, Wang Y, Wu CH. Acceptance Concern and Life Satisfaction for Chinese LGBs: The Mediating Role of Self-Concealment. Soc Indic Res. 2013;114:687–701.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wise AE, Smith BC, Armelie AP, Boarts JM, Delahanty DL. Age moderates the relationship between source of social support and mental health in racial minority lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. J Health Psychol. 2019;24:888–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Adams DR, Meyers SA, Beidas RS. The Relationship Between Financial Strain, Perceived Stress, Psychological Symptoms, and Academic and Social Integration in Undergraduate Students. J Am Coll Heal. 2016;64:362–70.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mamun MA, Hossain MS, Griffiths MD. Mental Health Problems and Associated Predictors Among Bangladeshi Students. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20:657–71.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turcotte Benedict F, Vivier PM, Gjelsvik A. Mental Health and Bullying in the United States Among Children Aged 6 to 17 Years. J Interpers Violence. 2015;30:782–95.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ummak E, Türken S, Keles S. Where to Belong: Being a Sexual and Ethnic Minority Group Member in Norway. Sex Roles. 2023;89:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Puckett JA, Horne SG, Herbitter C, Maroney MR, Levitt HM. Differences Across Contexts: Minority Stress and Interpersonal Relationships for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Women. Psychol Women Q. 2017;41:8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Escobar-Viera CG, Whitfield DL, Wessel CB, Shensa A, Sidani JE, Brown AL, et al. For better or for worse? A systematic review of the evidence on social media use and depression among lesbian, gay, and bisexual minorities. JMIR Ment Heal. 2018;5:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Watson RJ, Grossman AH, Russell ST. Sources of Social Support and Mental Health Among LGB Youth. Youth Soc. 2019;51:30–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Liang Z, Te HY. “Strong Together”: Minority Stress, Internalized Homophobia, Relationship Satisfaction, and Depressive Symptoms among Taiwanese Young Gay Men. J Sex Res. 2022;59:621–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. DeLaney EN, Williams CD, Jones SCT, Hood KB, Cage J, Coston BE, et al. Sexual Victimization and Mental Health Among LGBQ + College Students: Examining Social Support and Trauma-Related Drinking as Mediators. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ding C, Chen X, Wang W, Yu B, Yang H, Li X, et al. Sexual Minority Stigma, Sexual Orientation Concealment, Social Support and Depressive Symptoms Among Men Who have Sex with Men in China: A Moderated Mediation Modeling Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2020;24:8–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Summergrad P. Medical psychiatry units and the roles of the inpatient psychiatric service in the general hospital. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994;16:20–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei L, Yu B, Zhai M, Li J, Liu D, Liu X, et al. Adverse childhood experiences, sexual minority stigma, social support and depressive symptoms among Chinese men who have sex with men: A moderated mediation modelling analysis. Curr Psychol. 2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Szymanski DM, Chung BY, Balsam KF. Psychosocial correlates of internalized homophobia in lesbians. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2001;34:27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML, Rendina HJ, Safren SA, Parsons JT. LGB-Affirmative Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Young Adult Gay and Bisexual Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Transdiagnostic Minority Stress Approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;83:875–89.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pan S, Sun S, Li X, Chen J, Xiong Y, He Y, et al. A pilot cultural adaptation of LGB-affirmative CBT for young Chinese sexual minority men’s mental and sexual health. Psychotherapy. 2021;58:12–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank all students included in this research for their participation in the study.


This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2018–15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Huijun Li: conceptualization, data curation, statistical analysis, methodology, drafting and editing the manuscript; Xiaoling Liu: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, editing the manuscript; Qingyong Zheng: data curation, methodology, Writing-review & graphics production; Siyuan Zeng: Writing-review; Xiaofeng Luo: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing and editing the literature review. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofeng Luo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Electronic informed consent form was approved by Ethics/ Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the IRB of the School of Public Health, Lanzhou University (approval dated September 18, 2020, issue: IRB20091801).

Although the study included three 15-year-olds, parental informed consent was not obtained for the following reasons: first of all, our study involves college students, so parental informed consent is not applicable to this study. On the other hand, because we are studying sexual minorities, their sexual identity is more private, and most people are not out to their parents. To protect the privacy of our subjects, we were restricted from obtaining informed parental consent. Finally, our study only involved questionnaires, which did no harm to the respondents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Liu, X., Zheng, Q. et al. Minority stress, social support and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students in China: a moderated mediation analysis. BMC Psychiatry 23, 746 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: