Skip to main content
Download PDF

Longitudinal associations of loneliness with mental ill-health, physical ill-health, lifestyle factors and mortality in ageing adults in Thailand

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 855 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal association between loneliness, mental and physical ill-health indicators, lifestyle factors and mortality among middle-aged and older adults in Thailand.

Methods

We analyzed prospective cohort data of participants 45 years and older from three consecutive waves in 2015 (n = 5616), 2017 (n = 3600), and in 2020 (n = 2863) of the Health, Aging and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study. Loneliness was assessed with a single item. To assess the longitudinal associations between loneliness and health outcomes between 2015 (baseline), 2017 (first follow-up) and 2020 (second follow-up), we conducted Generalized Estimating Equations analysis (GEE).

Results

The proportion of loneliness was 21.6% in 2015, 23.8% in 2017 and 21.3% in 2020. In the adjusted GEE logistic regression model, loneliness was positively associated with mental ill-health (poor self-rated mental health status, poor quality of life/happiness, depressive symptoms, and insomnia symptoms), physical ill-health (poor self-rated physical health status, hypertension, kidney disease, osteoporosis, and ADL disability), and lifestyle factors (physical inactivity, and having underweight). Furthermore, in adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, loneliness was associated with mortality. In adjusted logistic regression, compared to without loneliness in all three study waves, having loneliness in one wave and/or two to three waves was positively associated with incident mental ill-health (incident poor self-rated mental health status, incident poor quality of life/happiness, incident depressive symptoms, and incident insomnia symptoms), incident physical ill-health (incident poor self-rated physical health status, incident diabetes, incident kidney disease, and incident ADL disability), and incident lifestyle factors (having incident underweight).

Conclusion

We found that loneliness was associated with several mental and physical ill-health indicators, lifestyle factors and mortality. Enhanced screening and treatment of loneliness may reduce mental and physical ill-health indicators in Thailand.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Loneliness is common in the general population and can increase in the ageing population due to a reduction of social relations [1,2,3]. The prevalence of loneliness among older adults in high-income countries was 28.5% [4], and in middle-income countries, for example, 9.9% in South Africa [5], 32.5% in Malaysia [6], 33.8% in India [7], and 21.7% in Thailand [8]. Loneliness can be considered as a social construct and not a mental disorder, such as depression, although reviews have shown that in older adults, loneliness was positively associated with depressive symptoms [9] and the onset of depression [10]. One other study showed that “loneliness is associated with depressive affect, but not with most other symptoms of depression” [11].

Loneliness may contribute to mental and physical ill-health [12, 13]. In terms of mental ill-health, loneliness has been associated with mental ill-health [14], depression [10, 15, 16], sleep disruption [13, 17,18,19,20], low life satisfaction [17, 21], and lower subjective well-being [13, 14]. Regarding physical ill-health, loneliness increased the odds of poor self-rated health [17, 22,23,24], cardiovascular disease [21, 25], hypertension, lung disease [25], diabetes [23], and functional disability [21, 22, 26]. Many investigations showed that loneliness was positively associated with engaging in an unhealthy lifestyle, such as physical inactivity [17, 21, 23, 27], current tobacco use [17, 18, 23, 24, 27], hazardous alcohol use [24], obesity [28], and underweight [21, 29]. Furthermore, in a systematic review loneliness showed an association with mortality [30].

Most research examining loneliness and its adverse health effects in older adults are conducted in high-income countries, but there is a lack of longitudinal information on these relationships in middle-income countries, such as Thailand [31, 32]. Some research seems to show differences between individualistic and collectivistic societies. For example, in a study among middle-aged and older adults in 14 European countries, Beller et al. [33] found that health effects of loneliness were stronger in more collectivistic countries and weaker in more individualistic countries. So, it is possible that in a more collectivistic Thailand health effects of loneliness are strong, which prompted this study.

Based on the cited research, we hypothesize that loneliness is associated with mental and physical ill-health, unhealthy behaviours, and mortality in middle-aged and older adults in Thailand. To improve our understanding on the association between loneliness and health outcomes in Thailand, the study aimed to assess the longitudinal associations between loneliness, and mental and physical ill-health indicators, lifestyle factors and mortality among ageing adults from 2015 to 2020 in Thailand.

Methods

The longitudinal data of three consecutive waves of Thailand’s Health, Aging and Retirement (HART) study (2015, 2017 and 2020) were analyzed. In a national multi-step sampling design, one adult (45 years or older) was selected randomly per household; see details [34]. The trained field workers conducted face-to-face interviews in the home of the participants. In addition, during wave 2 and 3 exit interviews were conducted with proxy respondents (spouse or household members with the best information about the primary interviewee’s death, on the date, cause, and place of death). The “Ethics Committee in Human Research, National Institute of Development Administration – ECNIDA (ECNIDA 2020/00012)” approved the study protocol, and participants provided written informed consent. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations (such as the Declaration of Helsinki).

Measures

Exposure variable

Loneliness was measured from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) item, “In the past week, how often did you experience feeling lonely?” defined as “almost always (5–7 days), often (3–4 days) or sometimes (1–2 days)”=1 and “very rarely (less than one day) or none”=0 [35].

Outcome variables

Mental ill-health outcomes

The self-rated mental health status was assessed with the question, “In general, how would you rate your mental health status?” reported on a 0 (= very poor) to 10 (= excellent) visual analogue scale. Self-rated poor mental health was defined as 0–7.0 (8.0 being the median).

Quality of life or happiness was sourced from the question, “In general, how satisfied are you with your quality of life (or how happy do you feel)?” reported on a 0 (= very poor) to 10 (= excellent) visual analogue scale. Self-rated poor quality of life/happiness was defined as 0–7 (8 being the median).

Depressive symptoms (≥ 10 scores) were evaluated using the CES-D-10 [35], without the loneliness item; Cronbach’s alpha was 0.7, in wave 1, 2, and 3 respectively.

Insomnia symptoms were defined as almost always (5–7 days) or often (3–4 days) (versus sometimes-1-2 days or very rarely or never) having trouble falling asleep/insomnia in the past week.

Brain diseases, including dementia were assessed by reported health care provider diagnosis.

Physical ill-health outcomes

Self-rated physical health status was measured with the item, “In general, how would you rate your physical health status?” reported on a 0 (= very poor) to 10 (= excellent) visual analogue scale. Self-rated (poor) physical health was defined as 0–6.0 (7.0 being the median).

Care-provider diagnosed chronic physical conditions including diabetes, kidney disease, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung disease, osteoporosis, and cancer.

ADL disability was sourced from a 4-item (dressing, washing, eating, and bathing) modified ADL scale [36]. Response options ranged from 0= “able to do it all by myself” to 3 = “need help for all steps”. ADL disability was defined as one of the four elements that cannot be done alone. (Cronbach’s α = 0.93 at wave 1, 0.90 at wave 2 and 0.92 at wave 3).

Life style factor outcomes

Tobacco smoking asked for, “Have you ever smoked cigarettes?” (“1 = yes, and still smoke now, 2 = yes, but quit smoking, and 3 = never”).

Hazardous alcohol use was sourced from questions on the amount and frequency of alcohol use, and defined as ≥ 3–4 and ≥ 5 standard units of alcoholic beverages for women and men, respectively, per week.

Physical activity/exercise (frequency: “How often do you exercise?” (days a week) and duration of any type: “On the day you exercise, how long do you exercise?” (minutes), was grouped into “none = inactivity, 1–149 min/week = low activity, and ≥ 150 min/week = high activity in the past week.” [37].

Body Mass Index (BMI) was sourced from self-reported body weight/height, and classified following Asian cut-offs criteria into “underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–22.9 kg/m2), overweight (23–24.9 kg/m2), obesity class I (25-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity class II (30 + kg/m2)” [38].

Mortality outcome

Mortality is measured by survival and exposure to death. The survival status was measured by the question of whether the respondent interviewed died in the 2015 wave or survived in the 2017 and 2020 waves.

Covariates

Covariates included sex, age, residence status, education, marital status, and subjective economic status (“How satisfied are you with your economic situation?” Rated from 1 to 10).

Data analysis

Pearson Chi-square statistics were applied to compare sample characteristics across study years. Adjusted logistic regression was conducted between participants who dropped out and stayed in the study in relation to sociodemographic factors and health variables. To assess the longitudinal associations between loneliness and mental and physical ill-health and lifestyle factor outcomes between 2015 (baseline), 2017 (first follow-up) and 2020 (second follow-up), we conducted Generalized Estimating Equations analysis (GEE). GEE is a kind of regression analysis that examines the correlations between repeated measures in a person, including subjects regardless of missing values [39]. For the GEE analysis, the working correlation matrix structure was ‘Independent’, and the link function ‘logit’. Two models are presented for the development of each health outcome. The first model regressing loneliness on each health outcome is unadjusted, and in the second model adjustments are made for sociodemographic factors, mental and ill-health factors, and lifestyle factors for each health outcome. Covariates were selected based on previous research [10, 13,14,15, 25, 26, 30,31,32]]. Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to assess the associations of loneliness with 5-year mortality in the total sample and calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI (model 1 unadjusted and model 2 adjusted with GEE model 2 covariates). Furthermore, logistic regression models were fitted between loneliness exposure and incident health outcomes (in wave 2 or 3, and free of condition in wave 1 or baseline). Collinearity was assessed with Variation Inflation Factors (VIFs) statistics but none was found. StataSE 15.0 (College Station, TX, USA) was used for the statistical analyses; p ≤ 0.02 was accepted as significant, missing values were discarded (< 3%), only body mass index had 6.0% missing, and was imputed.

Results

Sample characteristics of the three study assessments in 2015, 2017 and 2020 are shown in Table 1. The proportion of participants 70 years and older increased from 40.6% to 2015 to 50.3% in 2020, and the proportion of male participants decreased from 47.8% to 2015 to 42.8% in 2015. The proportion of loneliness was 21.6% in 2015, 23.8% in 2017 and 21.3% in 2020. There were significant differences in lifestyle measures (hazardous alcohol use, tobacco smoking, and physical inactivity) and mental ill-health factors (probable depression, self-reported poor mental health, poor quality of life/happiness, brain disease/dementia and loneliness). Physical ill-health conditions (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, osteoporosis, kidney disease, ADL disability) all significantly increased from 2015 to 2020. Of 5616 participants at baseline, 361 died, 336 refused and 2056 were not traced from 2015 to 2020 (see Table 1). Logistic regression shows the differences between participants who dropped out and stayed in the study in relation to sociodemographic factors and health variables. In terms of sociodemographic factors, participants who dropped out were older, were men, had higher education, lived in urban areas, were widowed and were Buddhists. From the 19 health indicators examined, only three (poor quality of life/happiness, having brain disease/dementia and those with physical inactivity) were higher in the drop out group than those who stayed in the study (see Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the study variables over time, HART 2015–2020
Full size table

Longitudinal analyses with health outcomes and loneliness as exposure variable

Table 2 shows the Odds Ratios of loneliness from separate regressions for each health outcome. In the GEE logistic regression model, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, lifestyle factors, mental ill-health factors, and physical ill-health factors, loneliness was positively associated with mental ill-health (poor self-rated mental health status, poor quality of life/happiness, depressive symptoms, and insomnia symptoms), physical ill-health (poor self-rated physical health status, hypertension, kidney disease, osteoporosis, and ADL disability), and lifestyle factors (physical inactivity, and having underweight). Furthermore, in adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, loneliness was associated with mortality (see Table 2).

Table 2 Longitudinal associations between loneliness and health indicators
Full size table

Longitudinal associations between loneliness and incident health indicators

In adjusted logistic regression, compared to without loneliness in all three study waves, having loneliness in one wave and/or two to three waves was positively associated with incident mental ill-health (incident poor self-rated mental health status, incident poor quality of life/happiness, incident depressive symptoms, and incident insomnia symptoms), incident physical ill-health (incident poor self-rated physical health status, incident diabetes, incident kidney disease, and incident ADL disability), and incident lifestyle factors (having incident underweight) (see Table 3).

Table 3 Longitudinal associations between loneliness and incident health indicators
Full size table

Discussion

This study is the first to investigate the associations between loneliness and the longitudinal development of health outcomes in Thailand. We found that loneliness was positively associated with the prevalence and incidence of mental ill-health (poor self-rated mental health status, poor quality of life/happiness, depressive symptoms, and insomnia symptoms), the prevalence and/or incidence of physical ill-health (poor self-rated physical health status, hypertension, kidney disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and ADL disability) and the prevalence and/or incidence of lifestyle factors (physical inactivity, and having underweight), and mortality.

Consistent with previous research [10, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], we found that loneliness was positively associated with mental ill-health (poor self-rated mental health status, poor quality of life/happiness, depressive symptoms, and insomnia symptoms). Moreover, we found a positive association between loneliness and incident brain disease/dementia in univariable analysis, which is also in agreement with previous investigations [40, 41]. The study found high associations between loneliness and mental ill-health, which may be explained by its comorbidity with mental ill-health, such as depression, and may possibly be bidirectional with depressive symptoms [23]. Furthermore, loneliness can cause thoughts that cause anxiety and reduce the ability to relax, leading to symptoms of insomnia [42].

In line with previous research [17, 21,22,23,24,25,26] we found that loneliness was positively associated with the prevalence and/or incidence of physical ill-health (poor self-rated physical health status, hypertension, kidney disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and ADL disability). The finding that loneliness was associated with various poor mental and physical ill-health outcomes in this population of middle-aged and older adults in Thailand, may confirm that health effects of loneliness are stronger in more collectivistic countries, such as Thailand, and weaker in more individualistic countries [33]. Mechanisms explaining the impact of loneliness on physical ill-health include neurobiological processes that generate cardiovascular and inflammatory stress responses [18] and persons with loneliness may engage in fewer health-promoting behaviours (e.g., physical inactivity, malnutrition) leading to higher physical ill-health [13].

Regarding lifestyle factors, we found in consistence with former studies [17, 21, 23, 27, 29], positive associations between loneliness and physical inactivity and underweight. The impact of loneliness on physical inactivity can be explained by the process of loneliness reducing affective self-regulation and contributing to reducing the motivation of participants to exercise [42]. However, while some previous research [17, 18, 23, 24, 27, 28] found associations between loneliness and current tobacco use, hazardous alcohol use and obesity, we did not find any significant associations. In unadjusted analysis, loneliness was negatively associated with current smoking. Aging adults in Thailand may not engage in substance use as a way to cope with loneliness [24, 43].

Study limitations.

The limitations of the study include that variables were evaluated by self-reporting, and that loneliness was only assessed with a single item, however high correlations with multiple item loneliness measures have been established [44], and the CES-D loneliness item “performs similarly to other loneliness measures” [45]. A further limitation includes the high loss at follow-up. However, from the 19 health indicators examined, only three (poor quality of life/happiness, having brain disease/dementia and those with physical inactivity) were higher in the drop out group than those who stayed in the study. Moreover, there is the potential of reverse causality and variables not assessed in this study may have influenced health outcomes. The study design used a national random sample of middle-aged and older adults in Thailand, however, age-standardized weighting to the national population was not conducted.

Conclusion

We found that loneliness and/or degree of loneliness exposure was positively associated with the prevalence and incidence of mental ill-health (poor self-rated mental health status, poor quality of life/happiness, depressive symptoms, and insomnia symptoms), the prevalence and/or incidence of physical ill-health (poor self-rated physical health status, hypertension, kidney disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and ADL disability) and the prevalence and/or incidence of lifestyle factors (physical inactivity, and having underweight), and mortality. This may confirm that in a collectivistic society in Thailand loneliness was associated with various adverse health outcomes. Enhanced screening and treatment of loneliness may reduce various negative health outcomes in Thailand.

Data Availability

Data is publicly available at Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART): https://hart.nida.ac.th/download-center/.

References

  1. Qualter P, Vanhalst J, Harris R, Van Roekel E, Lodder G, Bangee M, Maes M, Verhagen M. Loneliness across the life span. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):250–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615568999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luanaigh CO, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2008;23(12):1213–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chawla K, Kunonga TP, Stow D, Barker R, Craig D, Hanratty B. Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0255088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen-Mansfield J, Hazan H, Lerman Y, Shalom V. Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(4):557–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215001532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phaswana-Mafuya N, Peltzer K. Loneliness and health among older adults in South Africa. Glob J Health Sci. 2017;9(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v9n12p1.

  6. Teh JK, Tey NP, Ng ST. Family support and loneliness among older persons in multiethnic Malaysia. Sci World J. 2014;2014:654382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/654382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Prevalence and correlates of loneliness among a nationally representative population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults in India. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2022;21(2):151–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness among middle-aged and older adults in Thailand. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01115-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearce E, Birken M, Pais S, Tamworth M, Ng Y, Wang J, Chipp B, Crane E, Schlief M, Yang J, Stamos A, Cheng LK, Condon M, Lloyd-Evans B, Kirkbride JB, Osborn D, Pitman A, Johnson S. Associations between constructs related to social relationships and mental health conditions and symptoms: an umbrella review. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):652. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05069-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann F, Wang J, Pearce E, Ma R, Schlief M, Lloyd-Evans B, Ikhtabi S, Johnson S. Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022;57(11):2161–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02261-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. von Känel R, Weilenmann S, Spiller TR. Loneliness is Associated with Depressive Affect, but not with Most other symptoms of Depression in Community-Dwelling individuals: A Network Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(3):799–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a Mini-review and Synthesis. Gerontology. 2016;62(4):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park C, Majeed A, Gill H, Tamura J, Ho RC, Mansur RB, Nasri F, Lee Y, Rosenblat JD, Wong E, McIntyre RS. The effect of loneliness on distinct Health outcomes: a Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2020;294:113514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giacco D. Loneliness and mood disorders: consequence, cause and/or unholy alliance? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2023;36(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SL, Pearce E, Ajnakina O, et al. The association between loneliness and depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years and older: a 12-year population-based cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Loneliness correlates and associations with health variables in the general population in Indonesia. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-019-0281-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cacioppo S, Capitanio JP, Cacioppo JT. Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1464–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawkley LC, Preacher KJ, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness impairs daytime functioning but not sleep duration. Health Psychol. 2010;29(2):124–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018646.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs JM, Cohen A, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Stessman J. Global sleep satisfaction of older people: the Jerusalem Cohort Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(2):325–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00579.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Associations of loneliness with poor physical health, poor mental health and health risk behaviours among a nationally representative community-dwelling sample of middle-aged and older adults in India. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(11):1722–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jessen MAB, Pallesen AVJ, Kriegbaum M, Kristiansen M. The association between loneliness and health - a survey-based study among middle-aged and older adults in Denmark. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(10):1338–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1348480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richard A, Rohrmann S, Vandeleur CL, Schmid M, Barth J, Eichholzer M. Loneliness is adversely associated with physical and mental health and lifestyle factors: results from a Swiss national survey. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Leinsalu M, Ferlander S, Sabawoon W, McKee M. Loneliness and health in Eastern Europe: findings from Moscow. Russia Public Health. 2015;129(4):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. puhe.2014.12.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petitte T, Mallow J, Barnes E, Petrone A, Barr T, Theeke L. A systematic review of loneliness and common chronic physical conditions in adults. Open Psychol J. 2015;8(Suppl 2):113–32. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101508010113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo L, An L, Luo F, Yu B. Social isolation, loneliness and functional disability in Chinese older women and men: a longitudinal study. Age Ageing. 2021;50(4):1222–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang J, Yockey RA, Chu Y, Lee JGL. The influence of loneliness on the Smoking and physical activity of Community-Dwelling older adults: results from the Health and Retirement Study. Am J Health Promot. 2022;36(6):959–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171221081136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lauder W, Mummery K, Jones M, Caperchione C. A comparison of health behaviours in lonely and non-lonely populations. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(2):233–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500500266607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramic E, Pranjic N, Batic-Mujanovic O, Karic E, Alibasic E, Alic A. The effect of loneliness on Malnutrition in elderly population. Med Arh. 2011;65(2):92–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang F, Gao Y, Han Z, Yu Y, Long Z, Jiang X, Wu Y, Pei B, Cao Y, Ye J, Wang M, Zhao Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7(8):1307–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01617-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wei K, Liu Y, Yang J, Gu N, Cao X, Zhao X, Jiang L, Li C. Living arrangement modifies the associations of loneliness with adverse health outcomes in older adults: evidence from the CLHLS. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02742-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kammar-García A, Ramírez-Aldana R, Roa-Rojas P, Lozano-Juárez LR, Sánchez-García S, Tella-Vega P, García-Peña C. Association of loneliness and social isolation with all-cause mortality among older Mexican adults in the Mexican health and aging study: a retrospective observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03750-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Beller J, Wagner A. Loneliness and health: the moderating effect of cross-cultural Individualism/Collectivism. J Aging Health. 2020;32(10):1516–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264320943336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anantanasuwong D, Theerawanviwat D, Siripanich P. Panel survey and study on health and aging, and retirement in Thailand. In: Gu D, Dupre M, editors. Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katz S, Ford AB, Heiple KG, Newill VA. Studies of Illness in the aged: recovery after fracture of the hip. J Gerontol. 1964;19:285–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/19.3.285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huffman MD, Capewell S, Ning H, Shay CM, Ford ES, Lloyd-Jones DM. Cardiovascular health behavior and health factor changes (1988–2008) and projections to 2020: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2595–602. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wen CP, David Cheng TY, Tsai SP, Chan HT, Hsu HL, Hsu CC, et al. Are asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than caucasians? Redefining obesity for asians. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(4):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980008002802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14(1):43–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Akhter-Khan SC, Tao Q, Ang TFA, Itchapurapu IS, Alosco ML, Mez J, Piers RJ, Steffens DC, Au R, Qiu WQ. Associations of loneliness with risk of Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(10):1619–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sundström A, Adolfsson AN, Nordin M, Adolfsson R. Loneliness increases the risk of all-cause Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020;75(5):919–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness and pathways to Disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2003;17(Suppl 1):98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-1591(02)00073-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. deWall CN, Pond RS. Loneliness and Smoking: the costs of the desire to reconnect. Self Identity. 2011;10:375–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mund M, Maes M, Drewke PM, Gutzeit A, Jaki I, Qualter P. Would the real loneliness please stand up? The validity of loneliness scores and the reliability of single-item scores. Assessment. 2022;10731911221077227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227.

  45. Newmyer L, Verdery AM, Margolis R, Pessin L. Measuring older adult loneliness across Countries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(7):1408–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study is sponsored by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).

Funding

The Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study is sponsored by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Supa Pengpid & Karl Peltzer

  2. Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa

    Supa Pengpid

  3. Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Supa Pengpid

  4. Department of Psychology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Karl Peltzer

  5. Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Karl Peltzer

  6. Center for Aging Society Research (CASR), National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Bangkapi Bangkok, Thailand

    Dararatt Anantanasuwong

Authors
  1. Supa Pengpid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl Peltzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dararatt Anantanasuwong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SP, KP and DA contributed to the design and implementation of the research. KP analyzed the results. SP, KP and DA wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Supa Pengpid.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The “Ethics Committee in Human Research, National Institute of Development Administration – ECNIDA (ECNIDA 2020/00012)” granted approval, and participants gave written informed consent. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations (such as the Declaration of Helsinki).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K. & Anantanasuwong, D. Longitudinal associations of loneliness with mental ill-health, physical ill-health, lifestyle factors and mortality in ageing adults in Thailand. BMC Psychiatry 23, 855 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05263-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05263-0

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us