Table 4 Dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC analyses of the CPL among the euthymic BD patients, the depressed BD patients, and the healthy controls, by different window size/window step/window type

16TR/2-step/hamming

Dynamic fALFF

Left

–3, − 75, − 45

13.80

38

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

14.01

57

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Left

–6, − 75, − 45

14.18

46

0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

14.08

81

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

24TR/2-step/hamming

Dynamic fALFF

Left

–3, − 75, − 45

14.98

31

0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

14.23

62

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Left

–6, − 75, − 45

13.06

34

0.008*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

14.20

81

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

48TR/2-step/hamming

Dynamic fALFF

Right

18, − 78, − 42

11.98

47

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Right

15, − 78, − 42

15.08

66

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

64TR/2-step/hamming

Dynamic fALFF

Right

21, − 78, − 42

11.34

35

0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Right

24, − 72, − 42

12.93

55

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

32TR/2-step/rectwin

Dynamic fALFF

Left

–3, − 75, − 45

13.83

20

0.025*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

18, − 78, − 42

12.11

57

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Right

21, − 75, − 45

11.69

62

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

32TR/1-step/hamming

Dynamic fALFF

Left

–3, − 75, − 45

14.71

23

0.010*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

13.59

54

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Dynamic DC

Left

–6, − 72, − 45

12.10

26

0.040*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*

Right

15, − 78, − 42

15.29

81

< 0.001*

EP < DP

< 0.001*

EP < HC

< 0.001*