Skip to main content
Download PDF

Decreased dynamic variability of the cerebellum in the euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

BMC Psychiatry volume 24, Article number: 137 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a complex mental illness characterized by different mood states, including depression, mania/hypomania, and euthymia. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate dynamic changes in intrinsic brain activity by using dynamic fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (dfALFF) and dynamic degree centrality (dDC) in patients with BD euthymia or depression and healthy individuals.

Methods

The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were analyzed from 37 euthymic and 28 depressed patients with BD, as well as 85 healthy individuals. Using the sliding-window method, the dfALFF and dDC were calculated for each participant. These values were compared between the 3 groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Additional analyses were conducted using different window lengths, step width, and window type to ensure the reliability of the results.

Results

The euthymic group showed significantly lower dfALFF and dDC values of the left and right cerebellum posterior lobe compared with the depressed and control groups (cluster level PFWE < 0.05), while the latter two groups were comparable. Brain regions showing significant group differences in the dfALFF analysis overlapped with those with significant differences in the dDC analysis. These results were consistent across different window lengths, step width, and window type.

Conclusions

These findings suggested that patients with euthymic BD exhibit less flexibility of temporal functional activities in the cerebellum posterior lobes compared to either depressed patients or healthy individuals. These results could contribute to the development of neuropathological models of BD, ultimately leading to improved diagnosis and treatment of this complex illness.

Highlights

This study highlights the importance of investigating dynamic intrinsic brain activity in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) during different mood states.

The patients with euthymic BD showed significantly less flexibility of temporal functional activities in the left and right cerebellum posterior lobe compared to patients with depressed BD or healthy individuals.

The use of dynamic fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and dynamic degree centrality allowed for a comprehensive analysis of brain activity, providing reliable and objective results.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a serious mental illness characterized by alternating mood states of depression, mania/hypomania and euthymia. These changes adversely affect emotion, cognition, activity level, social function, and quality of life even when the patient is euthymic [1]. The diversity of mood states, which occur over the entire course of BD, greatly challenges clinical decisions regarding diagnosis and treatment. Before the disease is fully exposed BD may be misdiagnosed as unipolar depression, and in error patients are easily given antidepressant monotherapy [2]. On the other hand, hypomania is often ignored by the patient and those around them, or sometimes the manic state is difficult to distinguish from schizophrenia [3]. Clinical characteristics associated with different mood states may reflect specific pathological alterations [4], including cognitive and functional impairment [5, 6]. Therefore, it is of great importance to differentiate the mood states of BD, including the euthymic.

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a technique that measures the intrinsic, spontaneous activity of the brain during rest, which consumes a significant amount of energy [7]. This makes resting-state fMRI a valuable tool for studying the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of neuropsychiatric diseases, including BD [8]. Resting-state fMRI provides various functional metrics that can supply disease-related information from different perspectives. For example, the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) is a functional metric that reflects the intensity of spontaneous brain activity from a given brain region. fALFF is derived from the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and represents the relative contribution of low frequency fluctuations within the frequency range. The advantages of fALFF as an evaluative functional metric include eliminating the influence of physiological noise and its better sensitivity and specificity for detecting spontaneous brain activity [9]. Degree centrality (DC) is another functional metric provided by resting-state fMRI. It is a derivative indicator based on functional connectivity and graph theory, which can reflect the importance of specific nodes in the brain functional connectome [10]. By measuring the degree of connectivity between different brain regions, DC can provide valuable information about the underlying neural networks that support cognitive and behavioral processes. Overall, the functional metrics provided by resting-state fMRI, such as fALFF and DC, can provide valuable insights into the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of neuropsychiatric diseases and better understand the complex functioning of the brain in health and disease.

Several studies have investigated the fALFF and DC in patients with BD. Compared to healthy individuals, patients with depressed BD have shown lower fALFF values in the left cerebellum posterior lobe (CPL) [11], right middle temporal gyrus [12] and right lingual gyrus [13]. However, they have shown higher fALFF values in the right inferior temporal gyrus [12] and bilateral superior frontal gyrus [13]. Patients with euthymic BD have shown higher fALFF values in the left superior temporal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, bilateral thalamus and right putamen [14]. Regarding DC as an index, a study by Russo et al. [4] reported that patients with depressed bipolar type 1 demonstrated a deficit of the sensorimotor network. The findings suggest that patients with BD in different mood states experience differences in pathological alterations, as revealed by fALFF and DC analyes.

Recent studies have recognized that the intrinsic activity of brain regions and brain networks are temporally variable and dynamic [15]. However, in all the studies described above, both the fALFF and DC values were calculated as static indices across the scanning time. Therefore, the dynamics of spontaneous brain activity during scanning have not been fully elucidated, despite the likelihood that the variability and flexibility of brain activity of specific regions and the entire neuronal network are important [16].

The investigation of dynamic fMRI metrics in BD is at an early stage. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only one study of dynamic fALFF (dfALFF) in patients with BD [17]. In this study, individuals with depressed BD had significantly lower dfALFF variability in the right middle and left inferior temporal gyrus compared to the healthy individuals. No study has investigated the dynamic DC (dDC) values in patients with BD and there are no studies that compare the dynamic spontaneous brain activity in patients with BD in different mood states.

When collecting fMRI data in patients with BD, it is easier to obtain data from patient with euthymic or depressed BD compared with to those who are manic. As a result, in previous studies, most patients have been either euthymic or depressed. According to Judd et al., the percentages of the BD population that are depressed, euthymic, and manic are 53%, 31%, and 16% respectively [18]. Since the majority of the BD population (84%) is non-manic, studies targeted at either euthymic or depressed patients may reveal the brain function alterations during most of the disease course.

The present study aims to investigate dynamic dysfunction during non-manic states of BD. The resting-state fMRI data were collected from our previous study [19], including depressed or euthymic populations as well as a healthy individual group. The sliding-window method was applied to calculate the dfALFF values and dDC values for each subject, and these values were compared among the three subject groups in a voxel-wise way. To validate the results, data analyses were repeated with different window lengths, step width, and window type. This type of analysis of dynamic functional metrics from a whole-brain view ensures that the method is data-driven and objective. The findings of this study will shed light on the dynamic dysfunction of specific brain regions during non-manic states of BD, providing valuable information for understanding BD pathology and developing neurobiological models of BD.

Methods

The Institutional Review Board of the Brain Image Center, Beijing Normal University and Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University approved this study. All participants provided prior signed consent.

Subjects

The initial data included that of 65 patients with BD and 85 healthy individuals, collected during our previous study, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and patients’ medication use [19]. In brief, the patients were all from Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University. Diagnoses of BD were based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorder-Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) [20]. The SCID assessments in this study were conducted by trained psychiatrists who possess extensive experience and expertise in diagnosing and assessing mental health conditions. Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) who had a history of comorbid psychiatric disorders were excluded from the study. Patients’ depressive symptoms were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) [21], and manic symptoms using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) [22]. Patients with YMRS scores ≤ 6 were included. Patients with BD and HAMD scores ≤ 7 were regarded as euthymic. Healthy individuals for the control group were recruited from nearby communities and screened using the non-patient version of the SCID. The handedness was assessed using the Chinese revised version of the Edinburgh handedness inventory [23]. And all the participants were right-handed, Han Chinese, with a primary or higher education. Because of large head motion (see our previous study [19]), 7 patients with euthymic BD, 2 patients with depressed BD, and 14 healthy individuals were excluded.

Finally, the study population comprised 56 patients (30 euthymic and 26 depressed) and a control group of 70 healthy individuals (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical factors of the patients with BD and the healthy controls
Full size table

Imaging data acquisition

A Siemens TIM Trio 3T system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) was used to scan the subjects at the Brain Imaging Center of Beijing Normal University. T1 images (128 volumes) were acquired after resting-state fMRI scanning (240 volumes). During the resting state, the subjects were required to keep their eyes closed, stay awake, and keep their body still. Functional images were collected using the Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) sequence: 33 axially slices, interlaced scanning, repetition time (TR) 2000 ms, echo time (TE) 30 ms, flip angle (FA) 90°, field of view (FOV) 200 × 200 mm2, matrix size 64 × 64, slice thickness 3.5 mm, and voxel size 3.13 × 3.13 × 4.2 mm3. T1 images were collected with the T1-weighted 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence: sagittal collected, TR 2530 ms, TE 3.39 ms, FA 7°, FOV 256 × 192 mm2, matrix size 192 × 192, thickness 1.33 mm, and voxel size 1 × 1 × 1.33 mm3.

Resting-state fMRI data preprocessing

All preprocessed steps were performed in DPABI v5.1 (http://rfmri.org/DPABI) [24]. The preprocessing steps consisted of the following: the first 5 timepoints were discarded; slice timing correction; realign; regression of several covariates (i.e., Friston-24 parameters of head motion, head motion scrubbing regressor, signals of the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid); normalization (T1 images and DARTEL toolbox, voxel size = 3 × 3 × 3 mm3); detrending; and band-pass filtering (0.01–0.1 Hz for DC analysis only). The framewise displacement (FD) and mean FD values were calculated as in our previous study [19].

dfALFF and dDC analyses

dfALFF and dDC were calculated by the sliding-window method [25, 26] in DPABI v5.1. In these calculations, the Temporal Dynamic Analysis toolkits were used. Referring to one recent study [16], 32 TRs window length, 2 TRs step width, and the Hamming sliding window were selected for the dfALFF and dDC analyses. Thus, 102 sliding windows were obtained. For each sliding window, fALFF and DC values were calculated separately via a voxel-wise method. The fALFF was calculated using the signal strength of the low frequency range (i.e., 0.01–0.1 Hz) to divide the detectable entire frequency range [9]. The DC value was the sum of the Pearson’s correlation coefficients of all possible pairs of voxels (correlation threshold of r0 was set at 0.25) [10, 27].

The fALFF and DC maps for each participant were converted into z-score maps using Fisher’s r-to-z transformation. The standard deviation of z-value maps across the 102 sliding-window was used to perform the dynamic maps. dfALFF maps and dDC maps were computed respectively. Finally, z-standardization was applied for the dfALFF maps and dDC maps. These dynamic maps were smoothed using a 4-mm full-width at half-maximum Gaussian kernel. The smoothed dynamic maps were entered into the second-level analyses.

Statistical analysis

Calculations of differences in demographic and clinical factors were conducted with SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, IL, USA) software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analyses were employed to compare differences in demographic factors across the euthymic BD, depressed BD, and control groups. The chi-squared test was used to compare gender ratios and educational levels. Regarding the HAMD scores, the Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the HAMD scores of the three groups did not follow a normal distribution. Therefore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test was employed to compare the HAMD scores across the three groups. In cases where a significant difference in HAMD scores was observed among the groups, post hoc T-test and Bonferroni correction (PBonferroni = Puncorrected× 3 < 0.05) was applied to compare pairs of groups.

The second-level analysis for dfALFF was conducted in SPM12 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK). One-way ANOVA was applied to compare differences across the euthymic BD, depressed BD, and control groups, with age, gender, education level, and mean FD as nuisance covariates. Multiple comparisons correction was performed via the cluster-level Family Wise Error (FWE) correction. Cluster-level threshold was set at PFWE < 0.05 and voxel-level threshold at Puncorrected < 0.001. For the regions surviving the threshold, post-hoc two sample T-test and Bonferroni correction were conducted to compare pairs of groups (PBonferroni = Puncorrected× 3 < 0.05). The same second-level analysis method was used for the dDC analysis. In the first-level and second-level dfALFF and dDC analyses, a gray matter mask was employed to limit the scope of our data analysis. The gray matter mask was made similarly with the method described in our previous study [19].

Within the HC group, EP group, DP group, and the combined group, potential associations were examined between HAMD scores and left dynamic ALFF, right dynamic ALFF, left dynamic DC, and right dynamic DC (brain regions with inter-group differences) using Pearson correlation analyses. A statistically significant threshold was set at PBonferroni = Puncorrected× 4 < 0.05.

Validation analyses

To verify our main results when 32 TRs/2 TRs/hamming was applied, other window lengths (16 TRs, 24 TRs, 48 TRs and 64 TRs), step width (1 TR) and window type (rectwin sliding window) were used to re-calculate the dfALFF and dDC values. The second-level analyses were conducted as described for the statistical analyses (above).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Among the 3 groups, the subjects were comparable regarding all demographic characteristics (P-values > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in HAMD scores among the three groups (F = 207.44, P < 0.001). And the further post-hoc analysis revealed that the patients with depressed BD had significantly higher HAMD scores compared with the other two groups (DP vs. HC: T = 18.30, PBonferroni < 0.001; DP vs. EP: T = 11.09, PBonferroni < 0.001), as indicated in Table 1. The healthy control group showed the lowest HAMD scores.

dfALFF and dDC

Based on the one-way ANOVA, the dfALFF and dDC values of the 3 groups each differed significantly, in the left and right CPL. Table 2 displays the mean, variance, and median of the dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC in the CPL for three groups: the depressed BD patients, the healthy controls, and the euthymic BD patients. The post-hoc analysis showed that the fALFF values of the euthymic BD group were significantly lower than that of either of the other groups (Fig. 1A and B, and Table 3), while the depressed BD and control groups were comparable (PBonferroni > 0.05). Similarly, in the post-hoc analysis, the dDC values of the euthymic BD group were significantly lower than that of either of the other 2 groups (Fig. 1C and D, and Table 3), and the depressed BD and controls groups did not differ significantly (PBonferroni > 0.05).

Table 2 The mean, variance and median of the dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC in the CPL for three groups: the depressed BD patients, the healthy controls, and the euthymic BD patients (32TR/2-step/hamming)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Significant differences were found between the patients with euthymic BD and patients with depressed BD, and between patients with euthymic BD and healthy individuals (32TR/2step/hamming). (A and B) The left (A) and right (B) brain region revealed by the dfALFF analysis. (C and D) The left (C) and right (D) brain region revealed by the dDC analysis. (E and F) The overlapped brain regions found in the (E) dfALFF and (F) dDC analysis

Full size image
Table 3 Results of the dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC analyses of the CPL among the euthymic BD patients, the depressed BD patients, and the healthy controls (32TR/2-step/hamming a), EP cf. DP cf. HC
Full size table

The regions of the left and right CPL showing alterations, indicated by the dfALFF and dDC analyses, overlapped. Specifically, there were 9 and 42 overlapped voxels in the left and right CPL, respectively (Fig. 1E and F).

The correlation analyses indicated that there was a significant positive correlation between HAMD score and right dynamic DC in the DP group (r = 0.571, PBonferroni = 0.008).

Validation analyses

The dfALFF and dDC analyses were repeated with other window lengths (16, 24, 48, or 64 TRs), step width (1 TR), and window type (rectwin sliding window). When window size/window step/window type were set to 16 TRs/2 TRs/hamming, 24 TRs/2 TRs/hamming, or 32 TRs/2 TRs/rectwin, significant differences in dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC values were each observed in the left and right CPLs, and areas of significance in dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC analyses overlapped (Table 4, and supplementary materials). Under the 48 TRs/2 TRs/hamming, and 64 TRs/2 TRs/hamming, significant differences in dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC values were observed only in the right CPL, and areas of significance overlapped (Table 4, and supplementary materials). Applying 32 TRs/1 TRs/hamming, significant differences in dynamic fALFF values were observed in the left and right CPLs; significant differences in dynamic DC values were only located in the right CPL, and areas of significance in dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC analyses overlapped (Table 4, and supplementary materials).

Table 4 Dynamic fALFF and dynamic DC analyses of the CPL among the euthymic BD patients, the depressed BD patients, and the healthy controls, by different window size/window step/window type
Full size table

Discussion

This study investigated the dynamic spontaneous brain activity in non-manic states of BD by using dfALFF and dDC. The resting-state fMRI data of 37 euthymic and 28 depressed patients with BD as well as 85 healthy individuals were analyzed using the sliding-window method. The results showed that both the dfALFF values and the dDC values were lower in the left and right CPL of patients with euthymic BD, compared to patients with depressed BD or the healthy control group. The findings were validated by repeating the analysis with different window lengths, step width, and window type.

These results led us to focus attention on the cerebellum and its subregions. Anatomically, the cerebellum of the normal human is divided into 10 lobules, I to X. These can be further classified as the anterior lobe (lobules I-V), posterior lobe (lobules VI-IX, including Crus I and Crus II and lobule VIIb), and flocculonodular lobe (lobule X) [28, 29]. Several studies have suggested that the CPLs are involved in emotion regulation [30, 31], working memory [32] and executive function [33]. The posterior lobe of the cerebellum is reportedly activated during responses to all 5 primary emotions (sadness, happiness, anger, fear and disgust) [34]. In another study, functional neuroimaging data of the subjects as they viewed a dramatic film indicated dynamic perceptual and affective processes in regions of the posterior and inferior cerebellum, and a dynamic interaction with higher order regions in the cerebral cortex [35]. In patients with cerebellum stroke, lesions in posterior lobe regions led to deficits in language, visual spatial, and executive functions, and affective dysregulation [36]. These findings in healthy individuals and patients with cerebellum lesions consistently indicate that the CPL is involved in higher brain functions, especially dysfunctional emotion, which is a characteristic of BD [37, 38].

Previous structural and functional neuroimaging studies have suggested that the cerebellum is involved in the pathophysiology of BD. Several studies have reported abnormal cerebellar structure in patients with BD, including reduced gray matter volume [39, 40] and abnormal microstructure [41]. In addition, several task-related fMRI studies have revealed brain dysfunction across different mood states of BD. For example, relative to healthy individuals, patients with euthymic BD demonstrated lower sensitivity to pain and significantly lower brain activity in the left cerebellum when experiencing pain [42]. During a task contrasting emotional with neutral distractors, pediatric patients with BD showed higher CPL activity compared with healthy individuals [43]. A meaningful case report showed that the subject developed a manic mood state with the incidence of a cerebellum sub-region lesion that involved the left lobules VI, VIIa (crus I), and IX, and the posterior area of the vermis [44]. Consistent with the above, in the present study, the dynamic functional activities in the left and right CPL of patients with euthymic BD were lower relative to that of either the patients with depressed BD or the control group. Altogether, these findings may provide evidence that the CPL is of crucial importance in the pathophysiology of BD.

In this study, the lower dfALFF values implied that the patients with euthymic BD had lower temporal variability and flexibility of regional brain activity in the left and right CPLs compared with healthy individuals. The dfALFF values of the patients with depressed BD were similar to that of the controls. No previous studies have conducted dfALFF analysis in patients with euthymic BD.

Recently, Sun et al. [17] reported that patients with depressed BD I showed lower dfALFF temporal variability in the right middle temporal gyrus and left inferior temporal gyrus, compared with healthy individuals. This contradicts the negative results of the present study regarding depressed BD patients. The discrepancies may be related to different sample size (65 herein cf. 40) and the heterogeneity of BD subjects: the present study included both BD I and BD II patients, but the population in Sun et al. [17] was entirely BD I.

In another study, Yu et al. [11] demonstrated lower static fALFF values in the left CPL in patients with depressed BD. We speculate that the lower dynamic variability of spontaneous brain activity in the CPLs of patients with euthymic BD may reflect a compensatory effect to maintain a relatively normal mood state. Therefore, lower dfALFF values may be a potential biomarker of euthymic mood state in BD.

Unlike fALFF, which can measure the local brain activity of specific brain regions, DC measures the centrality of specific brain regions from the perspective of the brain connectome. In the present study, regions revealed in the dDC analysis overlapped with those of the dfALFF analysis. The patients with euthymic BD showed lesser dynamic variability and flexibility of centrality of integrating global resting-state activity in the left and right CPLs compared with the depressed BD group or control, while the latter two groups were similar. To our best knowledge, no previous studies have conducted dDC analyses in patients with euthymic BD and depressed BD.

DC is an analysis index based on graph theory. Other indices using the graph theory approach have also found abnormalities in the CPL of patients with BD. For example, the nodal characteristics (nodal efficiency and nodal strength) of the left CPL were lower in unmedicated patients with depressed BD [45]. Whole-brain connectivity analyses suggested that patients with euthymic BD had significantly lower functional connectivity strength in the bilateral CPLs [46]. Within-network analysis revealed lower connectivity in the cerebellum resting-state networks in patients with euthymic BD [47]. Although our study did not include patients with manic BD, such patients have also been found with abnormal static DC in the CPL [48]. As we speculated on the causes of abnormal dfALFF values in the patients with euthymic BD (above), the lower dDC values shown by the patients in this group may be a compensatory effect to keep the mood relatively stable, making it another potential biomarker of euthymic mood state in BD. Additionally, it is evident that the EP group exhibits high variance in both dfALFF and dDC analyses. This suggests that the extent of dfALFF and dDC reduction needed to maintain emotional stability varies greatly among individuals within the EP group. Some EP patients may require a lesser degree of dfALFF and dDC reduction, while others may require a greater degree. The correlation analysis confirms that the higher variability of dynamic DC in the right cerebellum posterior lobe (indicating lower stability) is associated with more severe depressive symptoms.

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, the sample size is relatively small and thus the present results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger sample size are necessary to validate these findings. Secondly, most of the patients in this study had received various psychotropic medications, which may have confounded the analysis of analyzing dynamic brain activity. Recruiting unmedicated individuals in the future may provide more reliable results. Thirdly, BD patients were categorized into depressed and euthymic groups based on their current emotional state, without taking into account the specific subtypes of BD. Further research can be conducted to explore the influence of different subtypes on the results. Fourthly, it is important to acknowledge that certain clinical factors such as illness duration, history of psychosis during previous episodes, age of onset of the disease, etc., may act as confounders in the research findings. We will consider these factors in future studies to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of their impact. Finally, data regarding the number of mood states that the patients had experienced was not collected. Since the number and predominant polarity of mood states can guide clinical medication and predict outcomes [49, 50], and may also affect dynamic brain function. Therefore, future studies should consider collecting this information to better understand the relationship between mood states and dynamic brain activity in patients with BD.

Conclusion

This study found that the dDC and dfALFF values of the left and right CPLs of patients with euthymic BD were lower than that of patients with depressed BD or healthy individuals, while the values of the latter two groups were similar. These findings provide further evidence for the possible role of functional alterations in the cerebellum in the pathology of BD, and could contribute to the development of neuropathological models of this disorder.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Solé B, Jiménez E, Torrent C, Reinares M, Bonnin CDM, Torres I, Varo C, Grande I, Valls E, Salagre E, Sanchez-Moreno J, Martinez-Aran A, Carvalho AF, Vieta E. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: treatment and Prevention strategies [J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20(8):670–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Meter A, Correll CU, Ahmad W, Dulin M, Saito E. Symptoms and characteristics of Youth hospitalized for Depression: Subthreshold Manic symptoms can help Differentiate Bipolar from Unipolar Depression [J]. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021;31(8):545–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2021.0057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunelle J, Milhet V, Consoli A, Cohen D. [Bipolar disorder in adolescence] [J]. Rev Prat. 2014;64(4):491–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russo D, Martino M, Magioncalda P, Inglese M, Amore M, Northoff G. Opposing changes in the Functional Architecture of large-scale networks in bipolar mania and depression [J]. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46(4):971–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Torres IJ, Hidiroglu C, Mackala SA, Ahn S, Yatham LN, Ozerdem E, Michalak EE. Metacognitive knowledge and experience across multiple cognitive domains in euthymic bipolar disorder [J]. Eur Psychiatry. 2021;64(1):e36. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Elias LR, Miskowiak KW, Vale AM, Köhler CA, Kjærstad HL, Stubbs B, Kessing LV, Vieta E, Maes M, Goldstein BI, Carvalho AF. Cognitive impairment in Euthymic Pediatric Bipolar disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(4):286–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raichle ME, Mintun MA. Brain work and brain imaging [J]. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819. 29(449– 76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smitha KA, Akhil Raja K, Arun KM, Rajesh PG, Thomas B, Kapilamoorthy TR, Kesavadas C. Resting state fMRI: a review on methods in resting state connectivity analysis and resting state networks [J]. Neuroradiol J. 2017;30(4):305–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400917697342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zou QH, Zhu CZ, Yang Y, Zuo XN, Long XY, Cao QJ, Wang YF, Zang YF. An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF [J]. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;172(1):137–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuo XN, Ehmke R, Mennes M, Imperati D, Castellanos FX, Sporns O, Milham MP. Network centrality in the human functional connectome [J]. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY: 1991), 2012, 22(8): 1862-75.https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr269.

  11. Yu HL, Liu WB, Wang T, Huang PY, Jie LY, Sun JZ, Wang C, Qian W, Xuan M, Gu QQ, Liu H, Zhang FL, Zhang MM. Difference in resting-state fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation between bipolar depression and unipolar depression patients [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(7):1541–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiu Y, Yang M, Li S, Teng Z, Jin K, Wu C, Xu X, Chen J, Tang H, Huang J, Xiang H, Guo W, Wang B, Wu H. Altered fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder [J]. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12(739210). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.739210.

  13. Wang X, Zhao N, Shi J, Wu Y, Liu J, Xiao Q, Hu J. Discussion on patients with bipolar disorder and depressive episode by ratio low frequency amplitude combined with Grey Matter Volume Analysis [J]. J Med Syst. 2019;43(5):117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1212-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chrobak AA, Bohaterewicz B, Sobczak AM, Marszał-Wiśniewska M, Tereszko A, Krupa A, Ceglarek A, Fafrowicz M, Bryll A, Marek T, Dudek D, Siwek M. Time-frequency characterization of resting brain in bipolar disorder during Euthymia-A Preliminary Study [J]. Brain Sci. 2021;11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050599.

  15. Ji S, Ma H, Yao M, Guo M, Li S, Chen N, Liu X, Shao X, Yao Z, Hu B. Aberrant temporal variability in brain regions during risk decision making in patients with bipolar I disorder: a dynamic effective connectivity study [J]. Neuroscience. 2021;469:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li L, Lu B, Yan CG. Stability of dynamic functional architecture differs between brain networks and states [J]. NeuroImage. 2020;216(116230). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116230.

  17. Sun F, Liu Z, Fan Z, Zuo J, Xi C, Yang J. Dynamical regional activity in putamen distinguishes bipolar type I depression and unipolar depression [J]. J Affect Disord. 2022;297:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Judd LL, Schettler PJ, Akiskal HS, Maser J, Coryell W, Solomon D, Endicott J, Keller M. Long-term symptomatic status of bipolar I vs. bipolar II disorders [J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;6(2):127–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1461145703003341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Z, Bo Q, Li F, Zhao L, Wang Y, Liu R, Chen X, Wang C, Zhou Y. Increased ALFF and functional connectivity of the right striatum in bipolar disorder patients [J]. Prog Neuro-psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020;110140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110140.

  20. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW, Fei LP, Liu XH. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders– Patient Edition (SCID- I/P) [M]. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.: Biometrics Research; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness [J]. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6(4):278–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity [J]. Br J Psychiatry. 1978. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.133.5.429. 133(429– 35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory [J]. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan CG, Wang XD, Zuo XN, Zang YF. Brain Imaging [J] Neuroinformatics. 2016;14(3):339–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4. DPABI: Data Processing & Analysis for (Resting-State)

  25. Zhou F, Zhan J, Gong T, Xu W, Kuang H, Li J, Wang Y, Gong H. Characterizing static and dynamic fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and its prediction of clinical dysfunction in patients with diffuse Axonal Injury [J]. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(3):e63–e70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Jiang Y, Su W, Xu L, Wei Y, Tang Y, Zhang T, Tang X, Hu Y, Cui H, Wang J, Yao D, Luo C, Wang J. Temporal Dynamics in Degree Centrality of Brain Functional Connectome in First-Episode Schizophrenia with Different Short-Term Treatment Responses: A Longitudinal Study [J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2021, 17(1505-16.https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.S305117.

  27. Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, Andrews-Hanna JR, Sperling RA, Johnson KA. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease [J]. J Neurosci. 2009;29(6):1860–73. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5062-08.2009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study [J]. NeuroImage. 2012;59(2):1560–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmahmann JD, Doyon J, Mcdonald D, Holmes C, Lavoie K, Hurwitz AS, Kabani N, Toga A, Evans A, Petrides M. Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space [J]. NeuroImage. 1999;10(3 Pt 1):233–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren Y, Guo L, Guo CC. A connectivity-based parcellation improved functional representation of the human cerebellum [J]. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45670-6.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sathyanesan A, Zhou J, Scafidi J, Heck DH, Sillitoe RV, Gallo V. Emerging connections between cerebellar development, behaviour and complex brain disorders [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(5):298–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0152-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD. An fMRI study of intra-individual functional topography in the human cerebellum [J]. Behav Neurol. 2010;23(1–2):65–79. https://doi.org/10.3233/ben-2010-0268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Blackwood N, Ffytche D, Simmons A, Bentall R, Murray R, Howard R. The cerebellum and decision making under uncertainty [J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;20(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumann O, Mattingley JB. Functional topography of primary emotion processing in the human cerebellum [J]. NeuroImage. 2012;61(4):805–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen VT, Sonkusare S, Stadler J, Hu X, Breakspear M, Guo CC. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(12):5652–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw334. Distinct Cerebellar Contributions to Cognitive-Perceptual Dynamics During Natural Viewing [J].

  36. Stoodley CJ, Macmore JP, Makris N, Sherman JC, Schmahmann JD. Location of lesion determines motor vs. cognitive consequences in patients with cerebellar stroke [J]. Neuroimage Clin. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.10.013. 12(765– 75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tournikioti K, Alevizaki M, Michopoulos I, Mantzou A, Soldatos C, Douzenis A, Dikeos D, Ferentinos P. Cortisol to Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulphate Ratio and executive function in bipolar disorder [J]. Neuropsychobiology. 2021;80(4):342–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coppola F, Courtet P, Olié E. [Neuropsychological Profile and Working Memory in Bipolar Disorder] [J]. Can J Psychiatry. 2018;63(5):314–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717744777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sani G, Chiapponi C, Piras F, Ambrosi E, Simonetti A, Danese E, Janiri D, Brugnoli R, De Filippis S, Caltagirone C, Girardi P, Spalletta G. Gray and white matter trajectories in patients with bipolar disorder [J]. Bipolar Disord. 2016;18(1):52–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lupo M, Olivito G, Gragnani A, Saettoni M, Siciliano L, Pancheri C, Panfili M, Bozzali M, Delle Chiaie R, Leggio M. Comparison of cerebellar Grey Matter alterations in bipolar and cerebellar patients: evidence from Voxel-based analysis [J]. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073511.

  41. Zhao L, Wang Y, Jia Y, Zhong S, Sun Y, Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Huang L. Cerebellar microstructural abnormalities in bipolar depression and unipolar depression: a diffusion kurtosis and perfusion imaging study [J]. J Affect Disord. 2016;195:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Han X, Liu X, Li L, Xie B, Fan B, Qiu Y, Liu T, Li L. Neural activation during Tonic Pain and Interaction between Pain and emotion in bipolar disorder: an fMRI study [J]. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9(555). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00555.

  43. Xiao Q, Wu Z, Jiao Q, Zhong Y, Zhang Y, Lu G. Children with euthymic bipolar disorder during an emotional go/nogo task: insights into the neural circuits of cognitive-emotional regulation [J]. J Affect Disord. 2021;282669–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.157.

  44. Lupo M, Olivito G, Siciliano L, Masciullo M, Molinari M, Cercignani M, Bozzali M, Leggio M. Evidence of cerebellar involvement in the onset of a Manic State [J]. Front Neurol. 2018;9(774). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00774.

  45. Wang Y, Wang J, Jia Y, Zhong S, Zhong M, Sun Y, Niu M, Zhao L, Zhao L, Pan J, Huang L, Huang R. Topologically convergent and divergent functional connectivity patterns in unmedicated unipolar depression and bipolar disorder [J]. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(7):e1165. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Zhong S, Chen G, Liu T, Zhao L, Sun Y, Jia Y, Huang L. Altered cerebellar functional connectivity in remitted bipolar disorder: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study [J]. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018;52(10):962–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867417745996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bellani M, Bontempi P, Zovetti N, Gloria Rossetti M, Perlini C, Dusi N, Squarcina L, Marinelli V, Zoccatelli G, Alessandrini F, Francesca Maria Ciceri E, Sbarbati A, Brambilla P. Resting state networks activity in euthymic bipolar disorder [J]. Bipolar Disord. 2020;22(6):593–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Deng W, Zhang B, Zou W, Zhang X, Cheng X, Guan L, Lin Y, Lao G, Ye B, Li X, Yang C, Ning Y, Cao L. Abnormal degree centrality Associated with cognitive dysfunctions in early bipolar disorder [J]. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10(140). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00140.

  49. Kamali M, Pegg S, Janos JA, Bobo WV, Brody B, Gao K, Ketter TA, Mcelroy SL, Mcinnis MG, Rabideau DJ, Reilly-Harrington NA, Shelton RC, Sylvia LG, Tohen M, Nierenberg A. Illness stage and predominant polarity in bipolar disorder: correlation with burden of illness and moderation of treatment outcome [J]. J Psychiatr Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.082. 140(205– 13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. García-Jiménez J, Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Jiménez-Fernández S, González-Domenech PJ, Carretero MD, Gurpegui M. Features Associated with depressive predominant polarity and early illness onset in patients with bipolar disorder [J]. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11(584501). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.584501.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants who volunteered for this study. We would also like to thank the Brain Image Center of Beijing Normal University for MRI facility support and the clinicians of Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University for recommending participants.

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical medicine Development of special funding support (No. ZLRK202335), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81901355, No. 82001408 and No. 81971250) and the General program of Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7192081).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhenzhu Chen and Zhifang Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100088, Beijing, China

    Zhenzhu Chen, Zhifang Zhang, Feng Li, Lei Zhao, Qijing Bo, Yuan Zhou & Chuanyue Wang

  2. Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100088, Beijing, China

    Zhenzhu Chen, Feng Li, Lei Zhao, Qijing Bo & Chuanyue Wang

  3. Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, 100069, Beijing, China

    Chuanyue Wang

  4. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, 100101, Beijing, China

    Yuan Zhou

  5. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China

    Yuan Zhou

Authors
  1. Zhenzhu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhifang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qijing Bo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chuanyue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhenzhu Chen: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Methodology, Writing– original draft. Zhifang Zhang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing– review & editing. Feng Li: Data curation, Project administration, Resources. Lei Zhao: Data curation, Project administration, Resources. Qijing Bo: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision. Funding acquisition. Yuan Zhou: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision. Chuanyue Wang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qijing Bo or Yuan Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and international committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures including human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Brain Image Center, Beijing Normal University and Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University. All subjects were provided written informed consent before this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, F. et al. Decreased dynamic variability of the cerebellum in the euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry 24, 137 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05596-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05596-4

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us