Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exploring the connection between ego-resiliency and health behaviors: a cross-sectional study of Polish health sciences students

BMC Psychiatry volume 24, Article number: 168 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between ego-resiliency and the intensity of health behaviors among Polish health sciences students.

Methods

The study involved 483 students from health-related faculties in southern Poland, consisting of 314 women (63.7%) and 179 men (36.3%). The average age of the participants was 21.7 ± 2.5 years. To assess resiliency (ER), the Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89-R12) by Block and Kremen was used in its Polish adaptation. The intensity of health behaviors was examined using the Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) developed by Z. Juczyński.

Results

The results revealed a positive correlation between the intensity of health behaviors and ER (r = 0.43, p < 0.001), both for the general factor and its categories (positive mental attitude, proper eating habits, preventive actions, and prohealth activities). Students with a high level of health behaviors exhibited significantly higher ER (M = 38.95, SD = 5.15) compared to those with average (M = 35.93, SD = 5.03) and low (M = 32.97, SD = 5.12) HBI levels. Among the HBI categories, Positive Mental Attitude showed the strongest correlation with both general ER and its factors: optimal regulation (OR) and openness to life experiences (OL). Furthermore, the correlation was found to be stronger with the OR and weaker with OL.

Conclusion

Higher ER in students is correlated with a greater frequency of health behaviors. Nurturing the development of ER may contribute to the maintenance of prohealth practices despite life difficulties and temporary loss of motivation. This, in turn, promotes the regularity of health behaviors, which is crucial for their positive impact on overall health.

Peer Review reports

Background

According to the concept of salutogenesis, health is a continuous process of seeking and maintaining balance amidst the constant burdens and demands of life [1]. The foundation for maintaining homeostasis is the ability to adapt to environmental, mental, and social stimuli in a manner that does not disrupt the structure and functioning of the individual in their biopsychosocial dimension [2]. The conservation of resources theory proposed by Hobfoll [3] states that the effectiveness of this process is influenced, among other factors, by the resources available to individuals, which impact their motivation to protect and enhance their health, limit activities that pose health risks, and facilitate the recovery process in case of health deterioration [3]. These adaptive potentials encompass personal and social factors, as well as attributes of the physical and natural environment that alleviate life stressors [4]. Five psychological resources have been identified as crucial for protecting mental health: a sense of control, self-efficacy, coherence, resiliency, and social support [3].

Resiliency can be understood both as a personality trait that contributes to the consistent prohealth regulation of behavior and as a dynamic adaptive process that arises in response to crises (resilience). As a personality trait, resiliency determines an individual’s capacity to adapt flexibly and effectively to both external and internal stressors [5]. It plays a crucial role in guiding the adaptive regulation process to navigate changing circumstances and difficulties, facilitating healthy functioning even in unfavorable conditions [6]. Due to its strong association with flexible self-regulation, this trait is commonly referred to as ego-resiliency (ER) in the literature [5]. ER is a relatively recent concept in research theory and practice, primarily explored by health and stress psychologists. Investigations into resilience as an adaptive process and ER as a personality trait have shed light on the diverse functioning of individuals facing crises and traumatic situations. Several researchers have recognized the multifaceted nature of ER as a trait [6,7,8,9]. It has been found to correlate with positive emotions such as optimism, self-efficacy, strong social relationships, and positive self-esteem [4, 8]. These factors may account for its ability to rebound from negative experiences in difficult situations (referred to as bounce-back) and maintain normal activities and a general openness to new experiences [10]. On the other hand, Block and Kremen emphasized the link between ER and self-control, describing it as a quality that enables adaptive flexibility in adjusting the level of control based on the situation at hand [6].

Previous research has consistently demonstrated the beneficial effects of ER on various aspects of functioning. ER has been found to facilitate adaptation to the requirements of subsequent stages of life [11, 12], and positively correlates with the quality of life in both healthy and clinical populations [13, 14], influence the speed of recovery and return to normal functioning following traumatic experiences such as armed conflicts, natural disasters, epidemics, and social pathologies [15, 16], and impact emotions [17,18,19,20,21].

Furthermore, a few studies have highlighted a positive relationship between mental resilience and engagement in habitual physical activity [22, 23], a greater tendency to adopt principles of rational nutrition [24], and the avoidance of risky behaviors [21, 25]. With its association with adaptive self-control, optimism, and self-efficacy, ER may facilitate the adoption of health-oriented lifestyle changes. It is particularly useful in maintaining consistent engagement in prohealth practices despite life challenges and temporary loss of motivation. This consistency is crucial for maximizing the positive impact of health behaviors on overall well-being [23, 26].

Simultaneously, adopting a healthy lifestyle plays a crucial role in the primary and secondary prevention of chronic diseases, which can lead to a decrease in quality of life, disability, and premature mortality. Understanding the resources that contribute to individuals’ inclination to engage in regular health behaviors, particularly those that can be modified, is vital for developing effective health promotion programs and interventions. Therefore, exploring the relationship between ER and the intensity of health behaviors among individuals from diverse social groups becomes an intriguing research topic within the field of public health. To date, this relationship has been examined in Korean children [27] and Polish seniors [28].

In view of the above, the aim of our study is to investigate the correlation between ER and the extent of health behaviors in Polish students. Combining the existing knowledge we assume that there may be a positive relation between the intensity of ego-resiliency and the frequency of health behaviors in this group of people. It is the first research exploring this relation it in the group of students.

Methods

The study employed a cross-sectional design and included health sciences students from the Silesian Medical University and Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland. The purposive sampling was used to check the relation in a group of people who tend to be aware of the role of health behaviours and therefore may have the positive cognitive component of attitude towards them and be more likely to execute them. All students from the two faculties offering health-related programs (Medical and Physical Education Faculties, N = 1500 students) were invited to participate in the research by electronic platform used to communicate with students (MS Teams) The information sessions with potential participants (800 students) were organized in direct contact and via electronic platform. They were presented with the study’s objectives, protocol, and research instruments. A power analysis approach was used for the sample size calculation. The inclusion criteria for participation in the study were providing consent to participate and completing the entire study program. Participants who reported receiving treatment for any mental disorders within the previous year and those with missing data were excluded from the final analysis.

Considering the primary aim of our study we set the following parameters for the analysis: an alpha level of 0.05, a power of 0.80 and an anticipated medium effect size based on Cohen’s guidelines.The estimated minimal sample size for the assumed criteria was 400 participants. To account for potential data loss and non-responses, we increased this estimate by approximately 20%, resulting in a target sample size of around 480 participants. Ultimately, data from 483 students with complete information were included in the analysis. The research group comprised 314 women (63.7%) and 179 men (36.3%). The gender distribution reflected the typical representation among students at the surveyed universities (Silesian Medical University: women: 68% men: 32%, Academy of Physical Activity: women: 58%, men: 42%). The average age of the participants was 21.7 ± 2.5 years (21.9 ± 2.8 for students from Silesian Medical University, 21.4 ± 2.0 for students from the Academy of Physical Education). The majority of the respondents, 78.9%, resided in urban areas, while the remaining 21.1% lived in rural areas.

Psychological tests were administered to collect the necessary research data. The level of ER was assessed using the Polish adaptation of Block’s and Kremen’s Ego-Resiliency Scale (ER89-R12) [6], which was developed by Kołodziej-Zaleska and Przybyła-Basista [29]. To measure the intensity of health behaviors, the Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) developed by Z. Juczyński [30] was utilized. The research took place in University laboratories during special meetings under the guidance of a psychologist in the second quarter of 2021.

ER scale

The Polish version of the scale consists of 12 statements that assess two factors of ER: optimal regulation (OR) and openness to new life experiences (OL). The OR factor includes statements 6–9, while the OL factor comprises questions 1–5 and 10–12. Respondents rate their level of agreement with each statement on a four-point scale, with 1 indicating “I do not agree at all” and 4 indicating “I agree very strongly.” The overall ER score is calculated by summing the scores from all the statements, ranging from 12 to 48 points. A higher score reflects greater resilience in the individual being assessed. The OR and OL subscale scores are obtained by summing the scores assigned to the statements corresponding to each factor. The reliability of the scale is reported as 0.80 for the general scale, 0.77 for the OR subscale, and 0.59 for the OL subscale [29]. In the current study, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated as 0.76 for the entire scale, 0.75 for OR, and 0.60 for OL.

Health behaviors inventory

The scale consists of 24 statements that assess health behaviors across four categories: positive mental attitude (coping with stress,emotional self-control, avoiding excess psychological tension) proper eating habits (dietary diversity, fiber intake, vegetable and fruit intake), preventive actions (compliance with medical recommendations, knowledge of emergency numbers, health literacy), and prohealth activities (undertaking physical activity, sleep hygiene, adequate physical regeneration, leisure activities). Respondents rate the frequency of engaging in each action on a five-point scale (1–5), where 1 represents “almost never,” 2 represents “rarely,” 3 represents “occasionally,” 4 represents “often,” and 5 represents “almost always.” The general HBI is obtained by summing the scores from all the questionnaire items. These raw scores are then transformed into Standard Ten Scores (1–10 Sten), where Sten scores of 1–4 represent low intensity, 5–6 signify average intensity, and 7–10 indicate high intensity. The specific intensities of health behaviors within each category are calculated by summing the scores of the relevant statements according to the questionnaire’s key [30]. The reliability of the tool, measured by Cronbach’s α coefficient, is reported as 0.85 for the entire inventory, while for the individual subscales, it ranges from 0.60 to 0.65 [30]. In the current study, Cronbach’s α coefficients are 0.85 for the entire scale and range from 0.68 to 0.80 for the subscales.

The research procedure was approved by ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice (PCN/0022/KB/277/19). Before data collection, all participants were informed about the aim of the study. They voluntarily participated in the research and had the right to withdraw their participation at any time. Written consent was obtained from each participant for the use of the collected examination.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistical parameters such as arithmetic means (M), standard deviations (SD), minimum (Min), and maximum (Max) values were computed. The reliability of the measures used was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s α coefficients in the study sample. Qualitative data were presented using the structure index. The Shapiro-Wilk’s tests were conducted to check the normality of distribution of quantitative variables. Their results confirmed the normal distribution for them. To examine the relationship between ER and health behaviors, Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted. In addition, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent samples was performed, followed by multiple Bonferroni tests, to determine if there were significant differences in ER across different levels of health behavior intensity (low, average, and high).

Results

The participants had an average score of 81.39 points for health behaviors (Table 1). The scores for individual categories of health behaviors were similar, ranging from 20.29 to 20.41 points. Participants scored highest in the preventive behaviors category, while the lowest scores were observed in the domain of health practices. By converting the scores to a sten scale, three levels of health behaviors were identified. Only 28% of the participants were classified as having a high level of health behaviors, while the majority of students (39.1%) were categorized as having an average level of health behaviors (Table 1).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of health behaviors
Full size table

The participants exhibited an average level of ego resiliency at 35.8 points (Table 2). None of the respondents scored below 18 points, and approximately 48.7% of the participants achieved a total score exceeding 36. Regarding the specific aspects of ego resiliency, participants attained an average score of 23.53 points in the OR category and 12.27 points on the scale measuring openness to new life experiences.

Table 2 Basic characteristics of ego-resiliency
Full size table

A moderate positive correlation was identified between ego resiliency and the overall intensity of health behaviors (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) (Table 3). Significant positive correlations were observed between ego resiliency, its components, and all categories of health behaviors. The most robust positive relationship was observed between positive mental attitude and OR (r = 0.51, p < 0.001). The weakest correlation was found between openness to new life experiences and health practices (r = 0.13, p < 0.01).

Table 3 The relationship between mental resilience and health behaviors (Pearson correlation)
Full size table

The results of the one-way ANOVA demonstrate that the overall ego resiliency score and its subscales are influenced by the level of health behaviors (Table 4). In the case of ego resiliency and OR, a strong effect was observed (F = 51.48, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.17; F = 51.21, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.17). Similarly, a significant relationship was found for openness to new life experiences, although the effect size was moderate (F = 15.96, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.06).

Additional analyses indicate significant differences among all compared groups. Individuals with high levels of health behaviors exhibited the highest ego resiliency (M = 38.95, SD = 5.15). The mean score in this group was significantly greater compared to individuals with average levels of health behaviors (M = 35.93, SD = 5.03) and those with low levels of health behaviors (M = 32.97, SD = 5.12).

Table 4 One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Full size table

Discussion

During the conducted research, it was discovered that mental resilience plays a significant role in the healthy psychological functioning of individuals [11,12,13,14,15, 18, 21, 31, 32]. This quality, which involves the ability to adapt self-control to situational demands and is positively correlated with optimism and self-efficacy, has been found to support the implementation of health-promoting lifestyle changes in various studies [21, 23, 25, 26, 33]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between mental resilience and the intensity of health-related behaviors among Polish students.

Based on our research findings, the average level of psychological resilience among the participants was 36 out of a maximum score of 48. This average level is comparable to that of students in health sciences from South Korea, the United Kingdom, and Poland [34,35,36,37]. In terms of overall health behaviors, at least 67.1% of the participants in our study exhibited an average or higher level (≥ 5 Sten score). This result is slightly more favorable compared to findings from similar studies involving student populations [38, 39].

Our study revealed a moderate positive correlation between psychological resilience and the overall measure of health behaviors among the surveyed students. This relationship has previously been investigated among Polish seniors [28]. These publications have indicated that a higher level of ego resilience is associated with a health-promoting lifestyle. It is important to note that these studies employed different research instruments and did not specifically examine the relationship between ego resilience and its components with specific categories of health behaviors.

In relation to behaviors primarily focused on physical health, such as healthy eating habits and prohealth activities, positive correlations were also observed, although their strength was comparatively weaker. Other studies conducted by various authors have similarly confirmed the relationship between the intensity of specific behaviors related to physical health, including physical activity [22, 23], healthy eating habits [27, 40, 41, 42], and avoidance of risky behaviors [25], with the level of psychological resilience. This association can be explained by the enhanced capacity for adaptive self-regulation exhibited by individuals with higher levels of ER [5, 6]. Such resilience facilitates overcoming daily challenges in achieving health-related goals, including those related to a health-promoting lifestyle [22, 23, 43]. Consequently, individuals with high resilience are more likely to maintain consistency in their behaviors, which is a crucial factor in attaining the health benefits associated with health-related behaviors.

The correlation between the intensity of self-regulation and its components with the level of OR (r = 0.42, p < 0.001) was found to be stronger than in the case of openness to experience (r = 0.28, p < 0.001). This can be attributed to the robust association between resiliency and flexible self-regulation, which plays a crucial role in adapting to changing life circumstances and overcoming challenges [6]. In validation studies of the Polish version of the ER-89-R12 questionnaire used in this research, the OR subscale exhibited a stronger correlation with the overall ER score (0.920) compared to the openness to experience scale (0.787).

The findings of our study hold significant implications for public health interventions. Low adherence to health behaviors is a major contributor to chronic diseases and premature mortality. Ego resiliency emerges as a supportive factor in maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and evidence from several studies demonstrates the modifiability of this trait [44, 45]. Therefore, promoting the development of ego resiliency should be incorporated into modern, comprehensive preventive interventions.

Combining the existing knowledge on the impact of ego resiliency on health, its potential for modification and positive relation with health behaviors, health-related lifestyle changes may be supported by the enhancement of ego resiliency. Developing self-regulation in variuos life situations is connected with general cognitive performance and components like mindfulness, acceptance, insight into values, cognitive defusion, engagement and. The use of different techniques aimed at developing the above-mentioned cognitive components and functions, typical for cognitive-behavioral therapeutic strategies, may be useful. It seems to be reasoned to introduce psychoprophylaxis into the study programmes for health sciences students as a subject introducing this knowledge and skills. ER can be practiced in daily activities by changing conditions or introducing disturbing stimuli whilst performing everyday, well-known tasks, e.g. daily rituals, leisure-time habits. Regular tai-chi trainings or active relaxation in the nature are confirmed to be effective in ER improvement [44, 45].

It is important to note that this study serves as a preliminary report on the relationship between the overall intensity of health behaviors and ego resiliency in Polish students. Three limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the obtained results primarily reflect students who are engaged in health education programs, potentially indicating a higher level of health awareness compared to the general young adult population. Therefore, future studies should include students from different universities and disciplines unrelated to health sciences to ensure a more diverse sample. Secondly, in this study, the intensity of health behaviors was subjectively assessed using a questionnaire. Future research would benefit from verifying these behaviors more accurately by incorporating objective measures and reassessing their relationship with ego resiliency. Lastly, investigating the causality of this relationship is crucial. Further investigations should explore the causal nature of the relationship between ego resiliency and the intensity of health behaviors.

Conclusion

There exists a significant and moderately strong positive correlation between the overall intensity of health behaviors and ego resiliency among students. This correlation is evident across all categories of health behaviors as well as in overall psychological resilience and its constituent factors. Notably, behaviors associated with mental health (positive mental attitude subscale) demonstrate the strongest correlation with ego resiliency. Furthermore, it has been observed that the intensity of health behaviors exhibits a stronger correlation with the OR than OL factor of ego resiliency. The level of resilience varies significantly depending on the degree of engagement in health behaviors, with higher levels of resilience observed among students with high levels of health behaviors and lower levels of resilience observed among those with low levels of such behaviors.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ER:

ego resiliency

HBI:

Health Behavior Inventory

OR:

optimal regulation

OL:

openness to new life experiences

M:

arithmetic means

SD:

standard deviations

Min:

minimum

and Max:

maximum

N:

number

References

  1. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aleksandrowicz J. W poszukiwaniu definicji zdrowia. Stud Filoz. 1972;9:79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hobfoll S. Social and Psychological resources and Adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6:307–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heszen-Celińska I, Sęk H. Psychologia Zdrowia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PWN; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Block JH, Block J. The role of Ego-control and Ego-resiliency in the Organization of Behavior. In: Collins WA, editor. Development of Cognition, affect, and Social relations. New York: Psychology; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Block J, Kremen AM. IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alessandri G, Vecchione M, Caprara G, Letzring TD. The Ego resiliency scale revised. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2008;57:1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vecchione M, Alessandri G, Barbaranelli C, Gerbino M. Stability and Change of Ego Resiliency from late adolescence to Young Adulthood: a Multiperspective Study using the ER89–R scale. J Pers Assess. 2010;92:212–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR. What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of Resilience and emotions following the Terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:365–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor ZE, Doane LD, Eisenberg N. Transitioning from High School to College: relations of Social Support, Ego-Resiliency, and Maladjustment during emerging Adulthood. Emerg Adulthood. 2014;2:105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(2):257–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dębski P. Ego-resiliency and life satisfaction in individuals with alcohol dependence. Psychiatr Psychol Klin. 2021;21:110–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson JC, Chew-Graham CA. Resilience and well-being. In: Chew-Graham CA, Ray M, editors. Mental Health and Older people: a guide for primary care practitioners. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masten AS, Motti-Stefanidi F. Multisystem resilience for children and youth in disaster: reflections in the Context of COVID-19. Advers Resil Sci. 2020;1:95–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruanto JM. The buffering effect of ego resiliency on the relationship of combat exposure and severity of post– traumatic stress disorder symptoms. College of Liberal Arts; 2021.

  17. Alessandri G, De Longis E, Eisenberg N, Hobfoll SE. A multilevel moderated mediational model of the daily relationships between hassles, exhaustion, ego-resiliency and resulting emotional inertia. J Res Personal. 2020;85:103913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brailovskaia J, Schönfeld P, Zhang XC, Bieda A, Kochetkov Y, Margraf J. A cross-cultural study in Germany, Russia, and China: are resilient and social supported students protected against Depression, anxiety, and stress? Psychol Rep. 2018;121:265–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schissel B. Coping with adversity: testing the origins of Resiliency in Mental Health. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1993;39:34–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vulpe A, Dafinoiu I. Positive emotions, coping strategies and ego-resiliency: a mediation model. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2012;33:308–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Chen X, Gong J, Yan Y. Relationships between stress, negative emotions, Resilience, and smoking: testing a Moderated Mediation Model. Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51:427–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin JJ, Mccaughtry N, Bo Shen, Fahlman M, Garn A, Ferry M. Resiliency, control, enjoyment and physical activity in African American High School Students. Sport Sci Rev. 2011;20:53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seaton CL, Bottorff JL, Jones-Bricker M, Lamont S. The role of positive emotion and Ego-resilience in determining men’s physical activity following a Workplace Health Intervention. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:1916–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim Y. The influence of self-resilience on Dietary Management in Middle School Students. Korean J Community Nutr. 2015;20:399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ostaszewski K. Zachowania ryzykowne młodzieży w perspektywie mechanizmów resilience. Warszawa: Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pyszkowska A. Personality predictors of self-compassion, ego-resiliency and psychological flexibility in the context of quality of life. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;161:e109932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim EG. Relations of Depression, Ego-resilience and Health Behaviors in High School Students. J Korean Soc Sch Health. 2017;30:174–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ogińska-Bulik N. The role of resiliency in adjustment to cancer in women. Psychoonkologia. 2012;15:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kołodziej-Zaleska A, Przybyła-Basista H. Ego-resiliency jako zasób osobisty–narzędzie pomiaru i jego wykorzystanie w badaniach interdyscyplinarnych. Czas Psychol. 2018;24:159–70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Juczyński Z. Narzędzia Pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kózka A, Przybyła-Basista H. Perceived stress, ego-resiliency, and relational resources as predictors of psychological well-being in parents of children with Down syndrome. Health Psychol Rep. 2017;6:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shegarf Nakhaei MR, Akbari Oryani T, Bayazi MH, Shomoossi N, Hoseini BL. Influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on psychological wellbeing and Ego-resiliency in type 2 diabetes patients in Sabzevar. Iran J Diabetes Obes. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijdo.v13i2.6477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Martin J, McCaughtry N, Shen bo, Fahlman M, Garn A, Ferry M. Resiliency, control, enjoyment and physical activity in African American High School Students. Sport Sci Rev. 2012;20:53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Denovan A, Macaskill A. Stress, resilience and leisure coping among university students: applying the broaden-and-build theory. Leis Stud. 2017;36:852–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jun W-H, Lee G. The role of ego-resiliency in the relationship between social anxiety and problem solving ability among South Korean nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;49:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee S-E, Kim S-G, Kim SH, Park SH, Seo EH, Yoon H-J. Association of Social Anxiety Disorder Symptoms with Self-Esteem, Ego-resiliency and Social Support in Medical Students. Anxiety Mood. 2020;16:98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pyszkowska A, Wrona K. Self-compassion, ego-resiliency, coping with stress and the quality of life of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. PeerJ. 2021;9:e11198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rogowska A. Healthy behavior patterns among physical education students. J Phys Educ Health-Social Perspective. 2020;9:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oskędra I, Wojtas K, Szarek A. Selected health behaviours of nursing students. Nurs Probl / Problemy Pielęgniarstwa. 2023;31:43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? Rev Gen Psychol J Div 1. Am Psychol Assoc. 1998;2:300–19.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Heszen I, Życińska J. Psychologia Zdrowia. W poszukiwaniu pozytywnych inspiracji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SWPS; 2008.

  42. Sińska B, Jaworski M, Panczyk M, Traczyk I, Kucharska A. The role of Resilience and Basic Hope in the adherence to Dietary recommendations in the Polish Population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrients. 2021;13:2108.

  43. Baumeister RF, Gailliot M, DeWall CN, Oaten M. Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. J Pers. 2006;74:1773–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kang J, Kim H-J. Effects of participation in a Forest Therapy Program on the Ego-resiliency and interpersonal relationships of Children requiring Protection. J Environ Sci Int. 2022;31:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Son JT, Lee JJ. The effects of a Tai Chi Training Program on physical fitness, stress response and Ego-resilience in nursing students. J Muscle Jt Health. 2017;24:217–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was financed by the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, agreement number PCN-2-092/N/2/I and Institute of Sport Sciences in Academy of Physical Education in Katowice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Sport Sciences, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Mikołowska 72A, 40-065, Katowice, Poland

    Małgorzata Dębska-Janus, Agnieszka Nawrocka & Jacek Polechoński

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pyskowicka 49, 42-612, Tarnowskie Góry, Poland

    Paweł Dębski, Wojciech Madejczyk & Karina Badura-Brzoza

Authors
  1. Małgorzata Dębska-Janus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paweł Dębski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Agnieszka Nawrocka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacek Polechoński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wojciech Madejczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karina Badura-Brzoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M. D.J., P. D., K. B.B.; methodology, M. D.J., P. D., K. B.B. validation, M. D.J., P. D., W. M., A. N., J., P.; interview training and main investigation, M. D.J., P. D., K. B.B., J. P., A. N., W. M.; resources, M. D.J., P. D., W. M., A. N., J., P., K. B.B.; data curation, M. D.J., P. D., W. M., A. N.; writing—original draft preparation, M. D.J., P. D; writing—review and editing, J. P., K. B.B.; D, A. N., J. P.; supervision, K. B.B.; J. P.; project administration, M. D.J.; All authors have reviewed and agreed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Dębska-Janus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice (PCN/0022/KB/277/19). It complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant for the use of the collected examination.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dębska-Janus, M., Dębski, P., Nawrocka, A. et al. Exploring the connection between ego-resiliency and health behaviors: a cross-sectional study of Polish health sciences students. BMC Psychiatry 24, 168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05617-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05617-2

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us